DASH Diet thread

Options
1679111223

Replies

  • emmamcgarity
    emmamcgarity Posts: 1,593 Member
    Options
    Yes my annoyance was from some tomato bisque soup from the deli and a package of frozen vegetables that I know both contained potassium. They just didn’t report it. Sunday afternoon is my grocery shopping day. I will be reading lots of labels.
  • zeejane03
    zeejane03 Posts: 993 Member
    Options
    So, thinking more about the importance on micro-nutrients with DASH, I dusted off my cronometer account and started playing around with numbers. Is the DASH's potassium, magnesium and calcium targets the same as the RDAs recommendations for these, or are they higher? I did a bit of googling but can't find an answer.
  • emmamcgarity
    emmamcgarity Posts: 1,593 Member
    Options
    I’m curious. I stumbled across this tidbit on Mayo in reference to treating low potassium due to illness or treatment. I’m not sure when the new labeling guidelines take effect. But lack of info certainly makes the DASH numbers challenging.

    “Because lack of potassium is rare, there is no RDA or RNI for this mineral. However, it is thought that 1600 to 2000 mg (40 to 50 milliequivalents [mEq]) per day for adults is adequate.”
  • lemurcat2
    lemurcat2 Posts: 7,885 Member
    edited February 2019
    Options
    zeejane03 wrote: »
    So, thinking more about the importance on micro-nutrients with DASH, I dusted off my cronometer account and started playing around with numbers. Is the DASH's potassium, magnesium and calcium targets the same as the RDAs recommendations for these, or are they higher? I did a bit of googling but can't find an answer.

    It was 4700 mg for potassium, which is close to the minimum at Cron, although I modified mine to the 4700. I didn't find a number for calcium to stuck with the default one at Cron (same with everything else).
  • emmamcgarity
    emmamcgarity Posts: 1,593 Member
    Options
    I am assuming these numbers are based on a 2000 calorie diet. My stats put maintenance calories for me closer to 1600. So I might just need to plan on scaling numbers.
  • zeejane03
    zeejane03 Posts: 993 Member
    Options
    I am assuming these numbers are based on a 2000 calorie diet. My stats put maintenance calories for me closer to 1600. So I might just need to plan on scaling numbers.

    My current stats, with the weight loss phase I'm currently in, is under 1,400 calories and my maintenance calorie intake is around 1,600. Katherine in the second podcast touched on that and said she thought it would be very hard to meet all the DASH requirements on anything less than 1,800 calories (if I'm remembering correctly). It's definitely more challenging to have less calories to work with!

    If you click on the NIH link, in the very first post in this thread, there's a section where the NIH adjusts the DASH servings sizes down, to fit different calorie intakes (1,200, 1,400, 1,600 etc). That's been very helpful for me and I've been following the recommendations for the 1,400 option. I'm going to track micro-nutrients on cronometer this week and it will be interesting to see where I come in, with having the lower amount of calories.
  • zeejane03
    zeejane03 Posts: 993 Member
    Options
    lemurcat2 wrote: »
    zeejane03 wrote: »
    I am assuming these numbers are based on a 2000 calorie diet. My stats put maintenance calories for me closer to 1600. So I might just need to plan on scaling numbers.

    My current stats, with the weight loss phase I'm currently in, is under 1,400 calories and my maintenance calorie intake is around 1,600. Katherine in the second podcast touched on that and said she thought it would be very hard to meet all the DASH requirements on anything less than 1,800 calories (if I'm remembering correctly). It's definitely more challenging to have less calories to work with!

    If you click on the NIH link, in the very first post in this thread, there's a section where the NIH adjusts the DASH servings sizes down, to fit different calorie intakes (1,200, 1,400, 1,600 etc). That's been very helpful for me and I've been following the recommendations for the 1,400 option. I'm going to track micro-nutrients on cronometer this week and it will be interesting to see where I come in, with having the lower amount of calories.

    My best results are when I'm around 1800 (at least 1600, which is my goal unless I'm more active than I've been), or when I go way over my veg goal and also have beans -- my 15 veg serving day with also some beans and fruit and whole grains was my best day so far.

    (I've not been tracking the past few days since I managed to let my pipes get frozen and burst and you can't get an emergency plumber due to extreme weather overall so I'm without water 'til Tuesday which just really sucks.)

    Oh no, that sucks about your pipes! Our guest bathroom froze up-the toilet just thawed last night :p No damage that we're aware of, however one of our in-door/outdoor cats refused to go outside all of last week, during the polar vortex, and also refused to use his inside litter box :s I've been cleaning up cat urine from rugs and then kids clothes (that never get hung up ugh!!), all week and I'm about ready to scream! Thankfully vinegar gets the smell out, I've gone through two of those big bottles already sigh.... had to spray my entire living room area rug today :(
  • lemurcat2
    lemurcat2 Posts: 7,885 Member
    edited February 2019
    Options
    zeejane03 wrote: »
    lemurcat2 wrote: »
    zeejane03 wrote: »
    I am assuming these numbers are based on a 2000 calorie diet. My stats put maintenance calories for me closer to 1600. So I might just need to plan on scaling numbers.

    My current stats, with the weight loss phase I'm currently in, is under 1,400 calories and my maintenance calorie intake is around 1,600. Katherine in the second podcast touched on that and said she thought it would be very hard to meet all the DASH requirements on anything less than 1,800 calories (if I'm remembering correctly). It's definitely more challenging to have less calories to work with!

    If you click on the NIH link, in the very first post in this thread, there's a section where the NIH adjusts the DASH servings sizes down, to fit different calorie intakes (1,200, 1,400, 1,600 etc). That's been very helpful for me and I've been following the recommendations for the 1,400 option. I'm going to track micro-nutrients on cronometer this week and it will be interesting to see where I come in, with having the lower amount of calories.

    My best results are when I'm around 1800 (at least 1600, which is my goal unless I'm more active than I've been), or when I go way over my veg goal and also have beans -- my 15 veg serving day with also some beans and fruit and whole grains was my best day so far.

    (I've not been tracking the past few days since I managed to let my pipes get frozen and burst and you can't get an emergency plumber due to extreme weather overall so I'm without water 'til Tuesday which just really sucks.)

    Oh no, that sucks about your pipes! Our guest bathroom froze up-the toilet just thawed last night :p No damage that we're aware of, however one of our in-door/outdoor cats refused to go outside all of last week, during the polar vortex, and also refused to use his inside litter box :s I've been cleaning up cat urine from rugs and then kids clothes (that never get hung up ugh!!), all week and I'm about ready to scream! Thankfully vinegar gets the smell out, I've gone through two of those big bottles already sigh.... had to spray my entire living room area rug today :(

    Ugh, that sucks too.

    I carefully left on faucets, but just spaced about the big sink next to my washing machine and pretty sure that's the culprit. It was totally fine so far as I know through Thursday evening (we got temp increasing all day Thursday) and then was disaster Friday morning -- I think the pipes developed a crack and then burst.

    Hope no major damage from the water before I turned it off.
  • emmamcgarity
    emmamcgarity Posts: 1,593 Member
    Options
    Sorry to hear about your frozen pipes and other cold weather woes. I live closer to the gulf and only occasionally have to deal with those issues
  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    Options
    Sorry to hear about your pipes, lemur!
  • zeejane03
    zeejane03 Posts: 993 Member
    Options
    Another question for everyone-

    under the grains section the NIH labels it 'Grains' and then there's a side-note that says to focus on mostly whole grains. Up to now I've been including all grains for servings, both whole and non-whole grains. What is everyone else doing? I have definitely focused more on whole grains since starting this experiment but I still eat white rice 2-3 times a week, brown rice 1 times or so a week. I just prefer white rice in certain dishes.
  • emmamcgarity
    emmamcgarity Posts: 1,593 Member
    Options
    I don’t often eat rice and haven’t had it since we have been tracking here. I’ve mostly been counting whole wheat bread slices for my whole grains. Occasionally a granola bar if it’s labeled as whole grain (but it is added sugar), and I also count lower sodium wheat thins as a whole grain. I will sometimes measure a cup of Cheerios as a whole grains serving for a snack in my lunch box at work. Oatmeal is another when I take the time to make it. Some of this feels like “creative counting”. My diary is public for anyone wanting to peek. Note that I personally don’t use a food scale. I recognize that it’s more accurate. However I’ve always focused on serving sizes of fruits and vegetables as a part of the WW healthy guidelines to meet nutrition goals, and my rate of loss has been as expected. I may at some point choose to start weighing food, but I’m just not there.
  • zeejane03
    zeejane03 Posts: 993 Member
    edited February 2019
    Options
    I don’t often eat rice and haven’t had it since we have been tracking here. I’ve mostly been counting whole wheat bread slices for my whole grains. Occasionally a granola bar if it’s labeled as whole grain (but it is added sugar), and I also count lower sodium wheat thins as a whole grain. I will sometimes measure a cup of Cheerios as a whole grains serving for a snack in my lunch box at work. Oatmeal is another when I take the time to make it. Some of this feels like “creative counting”. My diary is public for anyone wanting to peek. Note that I personally don’t use a food scale. I recognize that it’s more accurate. However I’ve always focused on serving sizes of fruits and vegetables as a part of the WW healthy guidelines to meet nutrition goals, and my rate of loss has been as expected. I may at some point choose to start weighing food, but I’m just not there.

    Ha, me too :# I 'have' to have a chip type thing with my lunches, and since starting DASH I've switched from chips/Fritos to Wheat Thins. I still get the crunchy/salty 'fix', but I don't have an urge to overeat on them like I do with other options. I feel a bit silly eating crackers with my lunch but it's been working well for me, and I totally count them as a whole grain lol!

    eta: I only use my food scale to spot-check at this point, right now I'm just going by DASH's serving size measurements-using cups, teaspoons etc. It hasn't been an issue so far so I'll keep doing this until it doesn't work anymore :)
  • emmamcgarity
    emmamcgarity Posts: 1,593 Member
    Options
    I just realized I didn’t actually answer your question. I have not been including non-whole grain foods in my DASH whole grain serving numbers. (I did not count my pizza crust as a whole grain serving)
  • emmamcgarity
    emmamcgarity Posts: 1,593 Member
    Options
    Yes! Join us! I like that DASH let’s you use it as a frame and adjust based on your goals.
  • emmamcgarity
    emmamcgarity Posts: 1,593 Member
    Options
    My most “creative” whole grain was a 100 calorie pack of whole grain goldfish crackers....
  • zeejane03
    zeejane03 Posts: 993 Member
    edited February 2019
    Options
    NovusDies wrote: »
    I live in total fear of water flowing through pipes in my home. I have dealt with a flooded house or portion of a house 4 times and that is at least 400 times too many. Hopefully your repairs will be quick and inexpensive.

    I have been following this thread pretty closely because my current diet has Med influences and I am always looking for improvements. It would be unwise for me to jump into DASH. I have a good system that is pretty effective for weight loss and satiation. I am implementing a tweak this week though that this thread/DASH inspired. I made a big batch of vegetarian chili to boost fiber and reduce my meat portion a little. I will also be relying on lentils a little more this week so I am not eating chili everyday. I am weak on fruit portions too so I am going to try adding in one additional serving a day this week.

    Is it okay if I join in the discussion?

    Please do! It would be great if we could get a bigger group going on this-and it doesn't matter if someone is doing DASH hard core or just changing one or two things to be more DASH-ish :) It's all in good fun and the little changes we make all 'count', (I know upping fiber has already helped with my digestion etc).

    That's why I'm enjoying this experiment so much-it's not an 'all or nothing' kind of deal, but more a set of guidelines that we can implement however works best for our eating preferences, schedules etc.
  • emmamcgarity
    emmamcgarity Posts: 1,593 Member
    Options
    Fruit -- 6
    Veg -- 2
    Dairy -- 1.5
    Whole grains - 2
    Meat -- 5 oz
    Added fat -- 1
    Nuts and seeds -- 1
    Added sugar - yes

    My fiber was low today. I may have one more glass of milk or juice today before bed but I haven’t decided just yet. Part of me just wants wine... My schedule was jam packed today which didn’t leave a lot of room for snacking. Maybe that’s good. I did pick up several DASH friendly items while grocery shopping. So, I am hoping for a good week