Why is this even remotely controversial?
Replies
-
http://www.mariakang.com/category/fitness/
It's sad that I've seen similar stories in the success threads and her story is being ripped apart and her success torn down because she chose to try to do a fitspo type photo.
Why do people on MFP choose to belittle this story but will scold anyone who does what they do to those who post fitspo pictures on the MFP Fitspiration thread or/and post their success stories in the Success area?
Because she didn't make it a before and after. There's no story, just an image. The woman was in the fitness industry and pageantry I believe before she even was pregnant. There's no "I learned how to eat better and get healthy" message in this. Just "I'm super fit and look hot. What's your excuse?". Success stories are just that...stories. Not judgement. They are easy to relate to for many people. That's why they're so popular. And it also helps if they're your friends.0 -
I was more disturbed about the Time Magazine photo of the woman being suckled by a 5 year old on a stool.
BINGO! You hit the nail on the head!!
It gives some people some of the same feelings that the "milk mom" did.
Not exactly the same, but I'm willing to bet that most of her detractors are female and mothers. Not all of them fat, even.
I'm putting in my 2 cents as to the original poster's question... Basically, "what's icky about this picture?"
Uh. Er....some women in impoverished countries breast feed their children at that age. Do you think that's icky? Breast milk is free for mothers and high in nutrients and protective immunity. Breast feeding is natural and boys aren't able to even have an erection until they go through puberty and aren't sexual at the age of six. It's looked down on in our society but we also cut off parts of our male children's genitalia for funsies (it really has little health benefit).
Judgmental much, lady? Maybe you should inform that judgement.
I made no comment on breast feeding or even my personal opinion of the breast feeding issue.
I made no comment on my personal opinion of the photo in question, besides the fact that trying to look sexy with children around your feet creeps me out.
I simply tried to explain why some people may find the image along with the text, "creepy".0 -
I was more disturbed about the Time Magazine photo of the woman being suckled by a 5 year old on a stool.
BINGO! You hit the nail on the head!!
It gives some people some of the same feelings that the "milk mom" did.
Not exactly the same, but I'm willing to bet that most of her detractors are female and mothers. Not all of them fat, even.
I'm putting in my 2 cents as to the original poster's question... Basically, "what's icky about this picture?"
Uh. Er....some women in impoverished countries breast feed their children at that age. Do you think that's icky? Breast milk is free for mothers and high in nutrients and protective immunity. Breast feeding is natural and boys aren't able to even have an erection until they go through puberty and aren't sexual at the age of six. It's looked down on in our society but we also cut off parts of our male children's genitalia for funsies (it really has little health benefit).
Judgmental much, lady? Maybe you should inform that judgement.
So there is such a thing as a free lunch....hmm....
HA!!!0 -
I was more disturbed about the Time Magazine photo of the woman being suckled by a 5 year old on a stool.
BINGO! You hit the nail on the head!!
It gives some people some of the same feelings that the "milk mom" did.
Not exactly the same, but I'm willing to bet that most of her detractors are female and mothers. Not all of them fat, even.
I'm putting in my 2 cents as to the original poster's question... Basically, "what's icky about this picture?"
Uh. Er....some women in impoverished countries breast feed their children at that age. Do you think that's icky? Breast milk is free for mothers and high in nutrients and protective immunity. Breast feeding is natural and boys aren't able to even have an erection until they go through puberty and aren't sexual at the age of six. It's looked down on in our society but we also cut off parts of our male children's genitalia for funsies (it really has little health benefit).
Judgmental much, lady? Maybe you should inform that judgement.
I made no comment on breast feeding or even my personal opinion of the breast feeding issue.
I made no comment on my personal opinion of the photo in question, besides the fact that trying to look sexy with children around your feet creeps me out.
I simply tried to explain why some people may find the image along with the text, "creepy".
She doesn't even look provocative. She's just kneeling because her children are tiny. :huh:0 -
Did you actually TRY to understand the point I was trying to make, or were you just looking for something to comment on?Publicity stunt, indeed!!!
Someone knows how to push the right buttons to get people talking.
1. Mixing sexy and babies just creeps some people out (me for one). I'm not saying that she looks skanky, but she ain't exactly dressed like someone loading up the minivan to schlep her kids to the grocery store. The photo makes the kids look like props.
2. Someone else mentioned the text. I agree - Yeah, "if I can do it, so can you!" sounds much less b¡tchy than her hands on her hips, saying "What's your excuse?" It's confrontational - on purpose.
Slick marketing product there. I imagine she paid a pretty penny for it.
DRESS CODE VIOLATION!!!
CALL CPS!!!
I did understand the point you were trying to make, it's just that it was a silly argument. Of course her kids were being used as part of the picture...that was kind of the point of the whole thing. She had a goal, and met it...with kids. People take pictures of kids all the time...and even *gasp* use them in advertisements! Are you complaining about those?
As for the tone of the argument...I don't even...seriously? She's being too confrontational? Do you want participation medals or something for trying your best and not hitting your goals?0 -
http://www.mariakang.com/category/fitness/
It's sad that I've seen similar stories in the success threads and her story is being ripped apart and her success torn down because she chose to try to do a fitspo type photo.
Why do people on MFP choose to belittle this story but will scold anyone who does what they do to those who post fitspo pictures on the MFP Fitspiration thread or/and post their success stories in the Success area?
Because she didn't make it a before and after. There's no story, just an image. The woman was in the fitness industry and pageantry I believe before she even was pregnant. There's no "I learned how to eat better and get healthy" message in this. Just "I'm super fit and look hot. What's your excuse?". Success stories are just that...stories. Not judgement. They are easy to relate to for many people. That's why they're so popular. And it also helps if they're your friends.
Did you actually look at the link? I'm guessing not.
And not all the Fitspo posts in the MFP Fitspiration thread have before and afters either.0 -
I was more disturbed about the Time Magazine photo of the woman being suckled by a 5 year old on a stool.
BINGO! You hit the nail on the head!!
It gives some people some of the same feelings that the "milk mom" did.
Not exactly the same, but I'm willing to bet that most of her detractors are female and mothers. Not all of them fat, even.
I'm putting in my 2 cents as to the original poster's question... Basically, "what's icky about this picture?"
Uh. Er....some women in impoverished countries breast feed their children at that age. Do you think that's icky? Breast milk is free for mothers and high in nutrients and protective immunity. Breast feeding is natural and boys aren't able to even have an erection until they go through puberty and aren't sexual at the age of six. It's looked down on in our society but we also cut off parts of our male children's genitalia for funsies (it really has little health benefit).
Judgmental much, lady? Maybe you should inform that judgement.
I made no comment on breast feeding or even my personal opinion of the breast feeding issue.
I made no comment on my personal opinion of the photo in question, besides the fact that trying to look sexy with children around your feet creeps me out.
I simply tried to explain why some people may find the image along with the text, "creepy".
She doesn't even look provocative. She's just kneeling because her children are tiny. :huh:
I didn't say 'provocative', I said 'sexy'.0 -
I was more disturbed about the Time Magazine photo of the woman being suckled by a 5 year old on a stool.
BINGO! You hit the nail on the head!!
It gives some people some of the same feelings that the "milk mom" did.
Not exactly the same, but I'm willing to bet that most of her detractors are female and mothers. Not all of them fat, even.
I'm putting in my 2 cents as to the original poster's question... Basically, "what's icky about this picture?"
Uh. Er....some women in impoverished countries breast feed their children at that age. Do you think that's icky? Breast milk is free for mothers and high in nutrients and protective immunity. Breast feeding is natural and boys aren't able to even have an erection until they go through puberty and aren't sexual at the age of six. It's looked down on in our society but we also cut off parts of our male children's genitalia for funsies (it really has little health benefit).
Judgmental much, lady? Maybe you should inform that judgement.
I made no comment on breast feeding or even my personal opinion of the breast feeding issue.
I made no comment on my personal opinion of the photo in question, besides the fact that trying to look sexy with children around your feet creeps me out.
I simply tried to explain why some people may find the image along with the text, "creepy".
She doesn't even look provocative. She's just kneeling because her children are tiny. :huh:
Ooops. Sorry lady. I kind of thought you were saying "yeah, it's so creepy just like breastfeeding older children!" but then I reread and realized you prefaced it with "some people think".
But I'm weirdly enough with Wheird on this one. It's not sexual. She may be making an emphasis on appearance with her teeny tiny outfit but it doesn't appear to be that sexual to me. Hence why I don't see the whole critique of the picture as being about how allowed she is to show her sexuality. It's wholesome and adorable without the text.0 -
I was more disturbed about the Time Magazine photo of the woman being suckled by a 5 year old on a stool.
BINGO! You hit the nail on the head!!
It gives some people some of the same feelings that the "milk mom" did.
Not exactly the same, but I'm willing to bet that most of her detractors are female and mothers. Not all of them fat, even.
I'm putting in my 2 cents as to the original poster's question... Basically, "what's icky about this picture?"
Uh. Er....some women in impoverished countries breast feed their children at that age. Do you think that's icky? Breast milk is free for mothers and high in nutrients and protective immunity. Breast feeding is natural and boys aren't able to even have an erection until they go through puberty and aren't sexual at the age of six. It's looked down on in our society but we also cut off parts of our male children's genitalia for funsies (it really has little health benefit).
Judgmental much, lady? Maybe you should inform that judgement.
I made no comment on breast feeding or even my personal opinion of the breast feeding issue.
I made no comment on my personal opinion of the photo in question, besides the fact that trying to look sexy with children around your feet creeps me out.
I simply tried to explain why some people may find the image along with the text, "creepy".
She doesn't even look provocative. She's just kneeling because her children are tiny. :huh:
I didn't say 'provocative', I said 'sexy'.
Well she can't exactly help looking sexy if she is sexy, now can she? If she wasn't in an intentionally provocative pose or outfit, then it is just her natural sexiness that you're basing that on.
Why do you hate women?0 -
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1102508-mfp-fitspiration
I guess someone needs to tell everyone in there that they are being too braggy, are wrong for having pictures of themselves with their kids and they are putting "unrealistic expectations" out to the public. :indifferent:0 -
I think people get upset because the comment looks a little catty and their knee-jerk reaction to it is to get defensive. I wouldn't pretend to know why as it's probably a mixture of different reasons for each person, but I can see why they get angry. That doesn't excuse rudeness and cruelty, though, and reading about some of the hate this woman has received makes me feel really gross inside. I've read her story and she hasn't had a perfect pixie life of being thin and carefree. In fact, I bet her story isn't unlike most of the stories of the people who are angry at her and attacking her. Personally, I see no real issue with the image. It's just another run of the mill fitspo thing, and it's actually pretty motivational in my opinion. The fact that a woman could have three children and still find time to stay on her fitness game is awesome! I hope she keeps it up and continues to love herself.0
-
Did you actually TRY to understand the point I was trying to make, or were you just looking for something to comment on?Publicity stunt, indeed!!!
Someone knows how to push the right buttons to get people talking.
1. Mixing sexy and babies just creeps some people out (me for one). I'm not saying that she looks skanky, but she ain't exactly dressed like someone loading up the minivan to schlep her kids to the grocery store. The photo makes the kids look like props.
2. Someone else mentioned the text. I agree - Yeah, "if I can do it, so can you!" sounds much less b¡tchy than her hands on her hips, saying "What's your excuse?" It's confrontational - on purpose.
Slick marketing product there. I imagine she paid a pretty penny for it.
DRESS CODE VIOLATION!!!
CALL CPS!!!
I did understand the point you were trying to make, it's just that it was a silly argument. Of course her kids were being used as part of the picture...that was kind of the point of the whole thing. She had a goal, and met it...with kids. People take pictures of kids all the time...and even *gasp* use them in advertisements! Are you complaining about those?
As for the tone of the argument...I don't even...seriously? She's being too confrontational? Do you want participation medals or something for trying your best and not hitting your goals?
Most mothers who take pictures with their children are actually looking at or making physical contact with their children.
I'm not saying she's a bad person, a bad mother, a bad anything. I'm saying that this image is an example of good, slick marketing.0 -
I didn't say 'provocative', I said 'sexy'.
0 -
I really don't like some of the faux-feminists take on this: 'she's letting the side down projecting this image'.
Women can wear whatever the hell they want. If they want to project their their sexuality they can. If they want to wrap their body in a burkha and hide it from the world they can. Clothes are morally neutral. This feminism-lite approach to appearance is just internalised hate dressed up as gender politics.
Feminism is about freedom and equality and the movement has more pressing issues in the world than someone's outfit - for example child marriage, and the unacceptably high rates of sexual assault and domestic violence.
I think you missed the "feminist point" on this. Have you been reading too many Miley Cyrus articles?
How many Miley Cyrus articles is too many? So what do you mean, what do you see as the "feminist point"? I just don't like women criticising other women's clothing choices and saying that's feminism. That's not MY feminism anyway.0 -
http://www.mariakang.com/category/fitness/
It's sad that I've seen similar stories in the success threads and her story is being ripped apart and her success torn down because she chose to try to do a fitspo type photo.
Why do people on MFP choose to belittle this story but will scold anyone who does what they do to those who post fitspo pictures on the MFP Fitspiration thread or/and post their success stories in the Success area?
Because she didn't make it a before and after. There's no story, just an image. The woman was in the fitness industry and pageantry I believe before she even was pregnant. There's no "I learned how to eat better and get healthy" message in this. Just "I'm super fit and look hot. What's your excuse?". Success stories are just that...stories. Not judgement. They are easy to relate to for many people. That's why they're so popular. And it also helps if they're your friends.
Did you actually look at the link? I'm guessing not.
And not all the Fitspo posts in the MFP Fitspiration thread have before and afters either.
Yeah. Sorry. I didn't. But to be honest, she put the picture on facebook. You have a point. Yeah, you can say that if everyone read her blog they could relate more to her. But really what was put into the media by her was just that picture.
And I still see it as radically different from the MFP success stories I've seen. But I'm not really trolling the success stories boards and just look when it's someone I know or a friend of a friend. The ones I've seen aren't braggy at all. Or else they'd look smug and rude. Also, we're on MFP not facebook. We're all here for fitness/health/appearance reasons.0 -
I was more disturbed about the Time Magazine photo of the woman being suckled by a 5 year old on a stool.
BINGO! You hit the nail on the head!!
It gives some people some of the same feelings that the "milk mom" did.
Not exactly the same, but I'm willing to bet that most of her detractors are female and mothers. Not all of them fat, even.
I'm putting in my 2 cents as to the original poster's question... Basically, "what's icky about this picture?"
Uh. Er....some women in impoverished countries breast feed their children at that age. Do you think that's icky? Breast milk is free for mothers and high in nutrients and protective immunity. Breast feeding is natural and boys aren't able to even have an erection until they go through puberty and aren't sexual at the age of six. It's looked down on in our society but we also cut off parts of our male children's genitalia for funsies (it really has little health benefit).
Judgmental much, lady? Maybe you should inform that judgement.
I made no comment on breast feeding or even my personal opinion of the breast feeding issue.
I made no comment on my personal opinion of the photo in question, besides the fact that trying to look sexy with children around your feet creeps me out.
I simply tried to explain why some people may find the image along with the text, "creepy".
She doesn't even look provocative. She's just kneeling because her children are tiny. :huh:
I didn't say 'provocative', I said 'sexy'.
Well she can't exactly help looking sexy if she is sexy, now can she? If she wasn't in an intentionally provocative pose or outfit, then it is just her natural sexiness that you're basing that on.
Why do you hate women?
What?!?!
Dude, that comment is so beneath you. You seem smarter than that.0 -
Did you actually TRY to understand the point I was trying to make, or were you just looking for something to comment on?Publicity stunt, indeed!!!
Someone knows how to push the right buttons to get people talking.
1. Mixing sexy and babies just creeps some people out (me for one). I'm not saying that she looks skanky, but she ain't exactly dressed like someone loading up the minivan to schlep her kids to the grocery store. The photo makes the kids look like props.
2. Someone else mentioned the text. I agree - Yeah, "if I can do it, so can you!" sounds much less b¡tchy than her hands on her hips, saying "What's your excuse?" It's confrontational - on purpose.
Slick marketing product there. I imagine she paid a pretty penny for it.
DRESS CODE VIOLATION!!!
CALL CPS!!!
I did understand the point you were trying to make, it's just that it was a silly argument. Of course her kids were being used as part of the picture...that was kind of the point of the whole thing. She had a goal, and met it...with kids. People take pictures of kids all the time...and even *gasp* use them in advertisements! Are you complaining about those?
As for the tone of the argument...I don't even...seriously? She's being too confrontational? Do you want participation medals or something for trying your best and not hitting your goals?
Most mothers who take pictures with their children are actually looking at or making physical contact with their children.
I'm not saying she's a bad person, a bad mother, a bad anything. I'm saying that this image is an example of good, slick marketing.
But she can't touch her kids because that would be 'creepy'0 -
I really don't like some of the faux-feminists take on this: 'she's letting the side down projecting this image'.
Women can wear whatever the hell they want. If they want to project their their sexuality they can. If they want to wrap their body in a burkha and hide it from the world they can. Clothes are morally neutral. This feminism-lite approach to appearance is just internalised hate dressed up as gender politics.
Feminism is about freedom and equality and the movement has more pressing issues in the world than someone's outfit - for example child marriage, and the unacceptably high rates of sexual assault and domestic violence.
I think you missed the "feminist point" on this. Have you been reading too many Miley Cyrus articles?
How many Miley Cyrus articles is too many? So what do you mean, what do you see as the "feminist point"? I just don't like women criticising other women's clothing choices and saying that's feminism. That's not MY feminism anyway.
I've read too many. I can't stand to look at another picture of that girl. But the reason I said that is because that's what's being argued in that whole controversy. None of the articles I've read about this or posts I've seen about this have at all talked about her sexuality. It's mostly been about fat shaming or unrealistic expectations or telling women that they need to focus on looking like she does. Sorry if I missed the few random posts talking about her clothes, but you're really focusing on a very small part of the commentary surrounding this and saying that's the "Feminist point of view" being portrayed. My feminist commentary on this topic has nothing at all to do with her sexuality or what clothes she chooses to wear. That's why I see your comment as pretty silly and irrelevant.0 -
What?!?!
Dude, that comment is so beneath you. You seem smarter than that.
I was being facetious.
0 -
What?!?!
Dude, that comment is so beneath you. You seem smarter than that.
I was being facetious.
Oh thank God!!!!0 -
Also, being self-satisfied never looked good on anyone. Y'know how pride is considered a sin and all, not that I'm even vaguely religious. No one likes a person who's being condescending and smug. Just an FYI for your future knowledge.
0 -
Also, being self-satisfied never looked good on anyone. Y'know how pride is considered a sin and all, not that I'm even vaguely religious. No one likes a person who's being condescending and smug. Just an FYI for your future knowledge.
You are evil for getting that song stuck in my head...0 -
Did you actually TRY to understand the point I was trying to make, or were you just looking for something to comment on?Publicity stunt, indeed!!!
Someone knows how to push the right buttons to get people talking.
1. Mixing sexy and babies just creeps some people out (me for one). I'm not saying that she looks skanky, but she ain't exactly dressed like someone loading up the minivan to schlep her kids to the grocery store. The photo makes the kids look like props.
2. Someone else mentioned the text. I agree - Yeah, "if I can do it, so can you!" sounds much less b¡tchy than her hands on her hips, saying "What's your excuse?" It's confrontational - on purpose.
Slick marketing product there. I imagine she paid a pretty penny for it.
DRESS CODE VIOLATION!!!
CALL CPS!!!
I did understand the point you were trying to make, it's just that it was a silly argument. Of course her kids were being used as part of the picture...that was kind of the point of the whole thing. She had a goal, and met it...with kids. People take pictures of kids all the time...and even *gasp* use them in advertisements! Are you complaining about those?
As for the tone of the argument...I don't even...seriously? She's being too confrontational? Do you want participation medals or something for trying your best and not hitting your goals?
Most mothers who take pictures with their children are actually looking at or making physical contact with their children.
I'm not saying she's a bad person, a bad mother, a bad anything. I'm saying that this image is an example of good, slick marketing.
But she can't touch her kids because that would be 'creepy'
Yeah, you got me there.
BTW, "being stronger" is your 'aspiration', not your 'inspiration'. There's a difference.0 -
Did you actually TRY to understand the point I was trying to make, or were you just looking for something to comment on?Publicity stunt, indeed!!!
Someone knows how to push the right buttons to get people talking.
1. Mixing sexy and babies just creeps some people out (me for one). I'm not saying that she looks skanky, but she ain't exactly dressed like someone loading up the minivan to schlep her kids to the grocery store. The photo makes the kids look like props.
2. Someone else mentioned the text. I agree - Yeah, "if I can do it, so can you!" sounds much less b¡tchy than her hands on her hips, saying "What's your excuse?" It's confrontational - on purpose.
Slick marketing product there. I imagine she paid a pretty penny for it.
DRESS CODE VIOLATION!!!
CALL CPS!!!
I did understand the point you were trying to make, it's just that it was a silly argument. Of course her kids were being used as part of the picture...that was kind of the point of the whole thing. She had a goal, and met it...with kids. People take pictures of kids all the time...and even *gasp* use them in advertisements! Are you complaining about those?
As for the tone of the argument...I don't even...seriously? She's being too confrontational? Do you want participation medals or something for trying your best and not hitting your goals?
Most mothers who take pictures with their children are actually looking at or making physical contact with their children.
I'm not saying she's a bad person, a bad mother, a bad anything. I'm saying that this image is an example of good, slick marketing.
But she can't touch her kids because that would be 'creepy'
Yeah, you got me there.
BTW, "being stronger" is your 'aspiration', not your 'inspiration'. There's a difference.
Who said it wasn't?0 -
Did you actually TRY to understand the point I was trying to make, or were you just looking for something to comment on?Publicity stunt, indeed!!!
Someone knows how to push the right buttons to get people talking.
1. Mixing sexy and babies just creeps some people out (me for one). I'm not saying that she looks skanky, but she ain't exactly dressed like someone loading up the minivan to schlep her kids to the grocery store. The photo makes the kids look like props.
2. Someone else mentioned the text. I agree - Yeah, "if I can do it, so can you!" sounds much less b¡tchy than her hands on her hips, saying "What's your excuse?" It's confrontational - on purpose.
Slick marketing product there. I imagine she paid a pretty penny for it.
DRESS CODE VIOLATION!!!
CALL CPS!!!
I did understand the point you were trying to make, it's just that it was a silly argument. Of course her kids were being used as part of the picture...that was kind of the point of the whole thing. She had a goal, and met it...with kids. People take pictures of kids all the time...and even *gasp* use them in advertisements! Are you complaining about those?
As for the tone of the argument...I don't even...seriously? She's being too confrontational? Do you want participation medals or something for trying your best and not hitting your goals?
Most mothers who take pictures with their children are actually looking at or making physical contact with their children.
I'm not saying she's a bad person, a bad mother, a bad anything. I'm saying that this image is an example of good, slick marketing.
But she can't touch her kids because that would be 'creepy'
Yeah, you got me there.
BTW, "being stronger" is your 'aspiration', not your 'inspiration'. There's a difference.
Unless I know what it feels like to be stronger...0 -
Did you actually TRY to understand the point I was trying to make, or were you just looking for something to comment on?Publicity stunt, indeed!!!
Someone knows how to push the right buttons to get people talking.
1. Mixing sexy and babies just creeps some people out (me for one). I'm not saying that she looks skanky, but she ain't exactly dressed like someone loading up the minivan to schlep her kids to the grocery store. The photo makes the kids look like props.
2. Someone else mentioned the text. I agree - Yeah, "if I can do it, so can you!" sounds much less b¡tchy than her hands on her hips, saying "What's your excuse?" It's confrontational - on purpose.
Slick marketing product there. I imagine she paid a pretty penny for it.
DRESS CODE VIOLATION!!!
CALL CPS!!!
I did understand the point you were trying to make, it's just that it was a silly argument. Of course her kids were being used as part of the picture...that was kind of the point of the whole thing. She had a goal, and met it...with kids. People take pictures of kids all the time...and even *gasp* use them in advertisements! Are you complaining about those?
As for the tone of the argument...I don't even...seriously? She's being too confrontational? Do you want participation medals or something for trying your best and not hitting your goals?
Most mothers who take pictures with their children are actually looking at or making physical contact with their children.
I'm not saying she's a bad person, a bad mother, a bad anything. I'm saying that this image is an example of good, slick marketing.
But she can't touch her kids because that would be 'creepy'
Yeah, you got me there.
BTW, "being stronger" is your 'aspiration', not your 'inspiration'. There's a difference.
Unless I know what it feels like to be stronger...
It's both for me. I want to be stronger than I was...and when I complete one of my fitness goals or up the weights...that inspires and motivates me to continue to fulfill my aspiration to continue being stronger.0 -
It's both for me. I want to be stronger than I was...and when I complete one of my fitness goals or up the weights...that inspires and motivates me to continue to fulfill my aspiration to continue being stronger.
Oh it can most certainly be both.
The difference between aspiration and inspiration when it comes to a wall that has predefined sections for input is a pretty asinine angle to critique.0 -
0 -
It depends on priorities. Does someone want a PhD or a banging body? Or are they satisfied with less than that? And I'd still be happy for the person with the PhD.
But that's the point. What's my excuse? My excuse is caring more about my work/family/mental acuity to want to look like a fitness model. (Note: I'm saying this as someone who lifts and who has a similar body to hers as a goal. I'm just speaking for other women). I don't think that makes me a woman an "jealous fatty" because she doesn't see that as a priority.
Sssshhhhhh. It is hard for me to objectify you when you keep posting.
Dude. I know, right? And they more I post, the more I risk having my "objectify me please" photos reported. Sigh. The hard life of an exhibitionist feminist.
Yeah, I hate CG #12 too.0 -
B!tches be trippin. 27 pages over this?0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions