Men, what kind of ladies do you like?

13468913

Replies

  • This content has been removed.
  • dirty_dirty_eater
    dirty_dirty_eater Posts: 574 Member
    LMAO at this post...NOW I see why I can't get a date! ;)

    And I'm 5'11 Double Whammy!!!!

    Honey, the only thing that should stop you from getting a date is a lack of men with a pulse.

    Hubba-hubba!
  • ThePlight
    ThePlight Posts: 3,593 Member
    smart, funny, caring, understanding...able to laugh at self and me without being self conscious and active...not a sit at home type. I use to ask the question...will you run...through the woods with me. If the answer is yes then I want to know more of the person. Odd question but it works.
    I'm into challenges. I went into the woods wearing my roller blades, went through mud in those things, got stuck twice, kept going until I got out. BEST DAY EVER.
    ETA: Okay, maybe not "best" but one OF the best days ever. Fixed.
  • FrenchMob
    FrenchMob Posts: 1,167 Member
    Sense of humor first and foremost.
    Intelligence that can carry a conversation.
    Not afraid of anything, or to try new things even risky things.
    Tall. I'm only 5'10" but love tall women in the 5'7" to 6" range.

    Example of physical appearances - Whitney Thompson. I guess she won america's top model at one point. She's considered a plus size model. 5'10", size 10.
    whitney-thompson-g.jpg
  • gabbygirl78
    gabbygirl78 Posts: 936 Member
    :huh: Ummm.... Idk but dudes that like women like this make me think maybe they are a little on the fence about their sexual orientation. You obviously like more masculine features than feminine features. Js.....

    This post is pretty rude. A person's preference in body type has very little to do with their sexual orientation. A man liking a women with big muscles in no way means he might be gay. A woman liking men with long hair also does not mean that she might be gay. There's no correlation there.

    ...on the other hand.

    strong-is-the-new-skinny.jpg?w=500

    This is not what I am talking about... This muscle definition is sexy ... not manly at all.
  • highervibes
    highervibes Posts: 2,219 Member
    This thread was a great read LOL
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    Not really. You're still calling her disgusting. That's not okay. "Buff women aren't my type," or "I'm not into large muscles," are much more appropriate because you acknowledge it as your preference, not any shortcomings on her part.

    Agree to disagree.
  • Sense of humor first and foremost.
    Intelligence that can carry a conversation.
    Not afraid of anything, or to try new things even risky things.
    Tall. I'm only 5'10" but love tall women in the 5'7" to 6" range.

    Example of physical appearances - Whitney Thompson. I guess she won america's top model at one point. She's considered a plus size model. 5'10", size 10.
    whitney-thompson-g.jpg

    I agree... I find these types of women attractive too.
  • Confident, curvy, out going, athletic, and not moody :)
  • rml_16
    rml_16 Posts: 16,414 Member
    the ones who saw the title and went on with their day without a second look.
    Some of us just like the entertainment value.

    I'm well ensconced in a very long-term relationship, so I'm pretty sure whatever men like, I already possess it.
  • Slacker16
    Slacker16 Posts: 1,184 Member
    True story:

    A little while ago, I went out on a date with a girl that I wasn't all that attracted to physically. She told me a story about accidentally getting her mom arrested for possession. She stole my heart with that :love:

    Take it any way you want.
    Only 5' 7 :cry:
    Other true story:

    I recently went out with a friend of mine and we started comparing each other's height on the metro home (our BAC may have been non-zero). From my perspective, the difference between us is pretty big (I'm ~1.75, he must be ~1.80-1.85). A (short) girl that was next to us started laughing and said "You know guys, from down here you look pretty much the same."

    Again, take it any way you want.
  • eventerchick80
    eventerchick80 Posts: 98 Member
    ...on the other hand.

    strong-is-the-new-skinny.jpg?w=500

    Can I have her?
  • rml_16
    rml_16 Posts: 16,414 Member
    Superficial things, like height requirements, are why most relationships fail
    So, do people not know how tall their SOs are until they're already in a relationship and then it fails because someone is too tall or too short?

    I can't say I've ever had that experience.

    I have..... they think they can adjust but then they just bail... mostly with weight instead of height... in the weight case they think you can lose it overnight and when you don't become what they want in the time frame they want they move on to the next "fixer upper" ...... If they were worth being with they would take you for your heart and your mind and they type person you are and not just how you look.
    Right, but he didn't name something that fluctuates and one can somewhat control. He specifically said height and used it in the context of relationships failing, which means not that a guy dismissed a potential relationship, but actually ended a current one.

    Because of height.

    As though that was not apparent from the get-go.

    Are people wearing lifts in their shoes?
  • TylerB1982
    TylerB1982 Posts: 9 Member
    My idea of the perfect woman is the one I lie next to every night :-)
    And yes, I wrote this because if I write anything different, she will find it and I will have hell to pay!! lol :laugh:
  • eric_sg61
    eric_sg61 Posts: 2,925 Member
    Superficial things, like height requirements, are why most relationships fail
    So, do people not know how tall their SOs are until they're already in a relationship and then it fails because someone is too tall or too short?

    I can't say I've ever had that experience.

    I have..... they think they can adjust but then they just bail... mostly with weight instead of height... in the weight case they think you can lose it overnight and when you don't become what they want in the time frame they want they move on to the next "fixer upper" ...... If they were worth being with they would take you for your heart and your mind and they type person you are and not just how you look.
    Right, but he didn't name something that fluctuates and one can somewhat control. He specifically said height and used it in the context of relationships failing, which means not that a guy dismissed a potential relationship, but actually ended a current one.

    Because of height.

    As though that was not apparent from the get-go.

    Are people wearing lifts in their shoes?
    Did you happen to miss the word "like", meaning I was giving an example of a superficial requirement that some people have. I could have said "Superficial things, like less than 7/10 facial aesthetics.
  • IPAkiller
    IPAkiller Posts: 711 Member
    the ones who saw the title and went on with their day without a second look.
    Some of us just like the entertainment value.

    I'm well ensconced in a very long-term relationship, so I'm pretty sure whatever men like, I already possess it.
    Oooh, Sassy!
    sassy.gif
  • ThinLizzie0802
    ThinLizzie0802 Posts: 863 Member
    Pale boobs?

    2lub9yv.jpg
  • This content has been removed.
  • rml_16
    rml_16 Posts: 16,414 Member
    Did you happen to miss the word "like", meaning I was giving an example of a superficial requirement that some people have. I could have said "Superficial things, like less than 7/10 facial aesthetics.

    I did not miss the word. In the context of the post, it was a very, very strange example.

    No one I know has ever gotten into a relationship and had it fall apart over height.

    Now, some people will not date people over or below a certain height, but in that case, there is no relationship to have fall apart. Please give me an example of an actual relationsip falling apart over someone's height.
  • runs4zen
    runs4zen Posts: 769 Member
    a woman who will let me satisfy her in bed before I get my turn. She's got needs and she's got to let me take care of them. :)

    BAM! How ya doin?

    No. The real question is how YOU doin'? We can talk about me later.

    :bigsmile:

    IN!
  • ruffnstuff
    ruffnstuff Posts: 400 Member
    a woman who will let me satisfy her in bed before I get my turn. She's got needs and she's got to let me take care of them. :)

    Check, please!!
  • tiggerhammon
    tiggerhammon Posts: 2,211 Member
    Not really. You're still calling her disgusting. That's not okay. "Buff women aren't my type," or "I'm not into large muscles," are much more appropriate because you acknowledge it as your preference, not any shortcomings on her part.

    Agree to disagree.

    I am sorry but I actually agree with this guy.
    Disgusting is not a nice word, at all. But in this particular example, it is not exactly the wrong word. There is absolutely nothing attractive about that kind of muscle on a woman to me. I look in the body building magazines and every time I come across a woman that looks like that I think "ew" and turn the page quickly.
  • ThePlight
    ThePlight Posts: 3,593 Member
    a woman who will let me satisfy her in bed before I get my turn. She's got needs and she's got to let me take care of them. :)
    So, tell me. How many friend requests did you get? ;) lol.
  • BrainyBurro
    BrainyBurro Posts: 6,129 Member
    Not really. You're still calling her disgusting. That's not okay. "Buff women aren't my type," or "I'm not into large muscles," are much more appropriate because you acknowledge it as your preference, not any shortcomings on her part.

    Agree to disagree.

    I am sorry but I actually agree with this guy.
    Disgusting is not a nice word, at all. But in this particular example, it is not exactly the wrong word. There is absolutely nothing attractive about that kind of muscle on a woman to me. I look in the body building magazines and every time I come across a woman that looks like that I think "ew" and turn the page quickly.

    ...except for the little problem of the usage of that word in that context being a violation of the TOS.
  • jboccio90
    jboccio90 Posts: 644 Member
    Did you happen to miss the word "like", meaning I was giving an example of a superficial requirement that some people have. I could have said "Superficial things, like less than 7/10 facial aesthetics.

    I did not miss the word. In the context of the post, it was a very, very strange example.

    No one I know has ever gotten into a relationship and had it fall apart over height.

    Now, some people will not date people over or below a certain height, but in that case, there is no relationship to have fall apart. Please give me an example of an actual relationsip falling apart over someone's height.

    I am 6'1 and I am not particularly superficial. I've dated men who are as short as 5'9- 5'10 and I would like to think dating someone who is 5'7 wouldn't bother me and maybe I'd begin a relationship with a guy of that stature but it could possibly be an issue later on.
    And perhaps I am a poor example since I am not average height, but what he is saying could actually happen.
  • Salty_Sauce
    Salty_Sauce Posts: 1,329 Member
    One with a great sense of humor, girl next door looks, FIT, not too much makeup, educated, playful, loves the outdoors..........

    and can rock a sundress !!
  • rml_16
    rml_16 Posts: 16,414 Member
    Did you happen to miss the word "like", meaning I was giving an example of a superficial requirement that some people have. I could have said "Superficial things, like less than 7/10 facial aesthetics.

    I did not miss the word. In the context of the post, it was a very, very strange example.

    No one I know has ever gotten into a relationship and had it fall apart over height.

    Now, some people will not date people over or below a certain height, but in that case, there is no relationship to have fall apart. Please give me an example of an actual relationsip falling apart over someone's height.

    I am 6'1 and I am not particularly superficial. I've dated men who are as short as 5'9- 5'10 and I would like to think dating someone who is 5'7 wouldn't bother me and maybe I'd begin a relationship with a guy of that stature but it could possibly be an issue later on.
    And perhaps I am a poor example since I am not average height, but what he is saying could actually happen.
    I'm going out on a limb to say that if you meet someone, fall for that person enough to actually begin a relationship (not a couple dates, but an actual relationship) and it fails, there's something much bigger going on than someone's height.
  • baldzach
    baldzach Posts: 1,841 Member
    Other than the obligatory "my wife" answer....

    I had a dream the other night about falling in love with the perfect girl -- and she was, too.

    So, if I remember right, she was about 5'5" with semi-long straight brown hair, very fit but not rail-thin (looked great in a swimsuit -- or without one), she was fun loving, could have a great time, but knew what's important and was able to prioritize. Unconditionally loving and completely accepting of who I am with all my faults. Never got riled or upset or overwhelmed, but was generally happy and positive. She loved doing things and didn't like being stuck in a house all day. She was spontaneous yet grounded, free-spirited yet religious. Adventurous yet practical. And always full of energy and remarkably healthy. She loved a good salad but also the occasional donut.

    Wow -- that was a good dream. Just sayin.
  • You just described me to a T :)
  • ironanimal
    ironanimal Posts: 5,922 Member
    Not really. You're still calling her disgusting. That's not okay. "Buff women aren't my type," or "I'm not into large muscles," are much more appropriate because you acknowledge it as your preference, not any shortcomings on her part.

    Agree to disagree.

    I am sorry but I actually agree with this guy.
    Disgusting is not a nice word, at all. But in this particular example, it is not exactly the wrong word. There is absolutely nothing attractive about that kind of muscle on a woman to me. I look in the body building magazines and every time I come across a woman that looks like that I think "ew" and turn the page quickly.
    That doesn't make it disgusting.

    That makes you a bigot attempting to invalidate the person's hard work because you don't find it visually appealing.
This discussion has been closed.