Just Clearing Something Up
Replies
-
This is what's going to happen to that owl:
I'm still trying to figure out what happens to the owl!0 -
0
-
Oh... That guy. Again. Is it time for kitteh gifs yet?
ETA: I see I'm late to the party. Nice boob, 10/10, w/mb.0 -
Just wanted to clear something up guys.
The moon is made of cheese. If you swim to the moon you will weigh less but you will gain fat because of your proximity to all that cheese.
That is all.
But what are all those lactose intolerant astronauts supposed to do?
Lack toast intolerant :laugh: :laugh:0 -
0
-
Pics of 5.4% BF not loading?
HTH
0 -
5 % body fat and NO vascularity? I call BS. And the reality is that this will end up being a guise and sooner or later Herbalife will be promoted as the "way" to attain this.
If you're a PT, then you shouldn't have passed if you don't believe that quantity of calories doesn't matter in weight loss.
A.C.E. Certified Personal/Group FitnessTrainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition0 -
I think o.p is saying for those who go over by a bit it's ok as long as it's not from 4 gallons of ice cream. But by a Apple or some chicken. And not to worry
Going over is going over, regardless of source.
No it's not - if you are talking about calories eaten! Which maybe the OP is talking about? but in a rather preachy kinda way!0 -
I think o.p is saying for those who go over by a bit it's ok as long as it's not from 4 gallons of ice cream. But by a Apple or some chicken. And not to worry
Going over is going over, regardless of source.
No it's not - if you are talking about calories eaten! Which maybe the OP is talking about? but in a rather preachy kinda way!
wut?0 -
I think o.p is saying for those who go over by a bit it's ok as long as it's not from 4 gallons of ice cream. But by a Apple or some chicken. And not to worry
Going over is going over, regardless of source.
No it's not - if you are talking about calories eaten! Which maybe the OP is talking about? but in a rather preachy kinda way!
wut?
Well you can eat 2000 calories, but depending on what you eat not all of those calories are going to be burnt as fuel or stored as fat for use as fuel later.
Therefore technically you can eat more calories and still lose weight (I shouldn't think you can eat massive amounts over) but probably going over by a hundred or so calories shouldn't stop weight loss.0 -
op is an idiot, brb eating a 500 cal surplus composed of "clean" foods and still losing weight, you're claiming the first rule of thermodynamics is false?
gtfo0 -
In for the gifs
Me too.0 -
0
-
Ah...I see. Per your profile you sell Herbalife.0
-
This gif is worthless without Brendan Fraser in a loin cloth.
There we go, muuuuuch better.0 -
This is what's going to happen to that owl:
I'm still trying to figure out what happens to the owl!
Guh, stupid broken gif :explode: , it's supposed to show a shark eating a seabird.0 -
This has been very entertaining.0
-
Nope. Eating too much healthy food is how I gain weight.0
-
Tennisdude's favorite new theory is that you can go over maintenance on calories all the time and not gain weight.
The reasoning in the past has been this is because of resistance starches, where all of the calories eaten don't actually get digested and absorbed.
It's kind of amusing. He seems to enjoy learning some new "theory" every now and then and touting it for a couple of weeks on the forum like it's some incredible revelation before forgetting about it and moving on.0 -
I must be different from everyone else then, because when I used to eat all those healthy foods in excess, I was overweight.
As soon as I ate my TDEE or less I lost weight.
I must be special:)0 -
Wait, so you are saying that if I ate home cooked, high quality, nutritious foods, but always ate too much of them, I would never have gotten fat?
Damn, I guess someone needs to tell reality that it got it wrong.0 -
For you calorie counters, please be advised that if you do go over on your calories, it's not the number of calories you should be concerned about. It's what's in those calories you should pay attention to. As long as you are eating right, and according to your health goal, you will be fine even if you go over on calories. Lean meats, protein snacks, fruits, vegetables, and whole grains go a very long way. If you are eating these things daily, eliminating the sugars, laying off on the fried foods, leaving the alcohol alone, and staying away from the bad fats, you are going to be fine. It's not all about the calories, ladies and gents. It's what's in those calories that matters.
Nope. You will still gain weight if you are in a calorie surplus, and it doesn't matter WHAT you eat. Our bodies are not stupid. :ohwell:0 -
How can I not subscribe after such a dumb OP?0
-
I ended a two-month cut a couple of weeks ago and quickly ramped back up to my calculated-based-on-years-of-data before exercise TDEE (of 2700) which was 600-800 more than my cut calorie limits. Since then, I have dropped another three pounds. Where's your science now?!?
Maybe I should make a forum post declaring that science is dead and that Chipotle and McDonald's are special calories that result in weight loss even when not in a calorie deficit.
Actually, forget the forum post...I'm going to write a book instead...because: 4. Profit!
I mean, obviously it isn't just scale fluctuation from a dozen of likely confounding variables that will inevitably sort themselves out over time such that my weight falls back to the calculated line like it has every other time it has ventured on either side of the expected for a relatively short period. Nope, certainly can't be that.0 -
I think o.p is saying for those who go over by a bit it's ok as long as it's not from 4 gallons of ice cream. But by a Apple or some chicken. And not to worry
Going over is going over, regardless of source.
No it's not - if you are talking about calories eaten! Which maybe the OP is talking about? but in a rather preachy kinda way!
If you go over your TDEE in anything at all, you will gain weight. I know I'm repeating myself, but type of food eaten has nothing to do with weight loss.0 -
Can't. Stop. Watching.
I like how he looks so proud of his derpiness-- like he was imitating someone and then looks up to make sure you got the joke0 -
I think o.p is saying for those who go over by a bit it's ok as long as it's not from 4 gallons of ice cream. But by a Apple or some chicken. And not to worry
Going over is going over, regardless of source.
No it's not - if you are talking about calories eaten! Which maybe the OP is talking about? but in a rather preachy kinda way!
If you go over your TDEE in anything at all, you will gain weight. I know I'm repeating myself, but type of food eaten has nothing to do with weight loss.
Yeah I'm not following either.0 -
Just saw the pictures of the OP as well. There is no way that is 5.3% body fat.0
-
I think o.p is saying for those who go over by a bit it's ok as long as it's not from 4 gallons of ice cream. But by a Apple or some chicken. And not to worry
Going over is going over, regardless of source.
No it's not - if you are talking about calories eaten! Which maybe the OP is talking about? but in a rather preachy kinda way!
wut?
Well you can eat 2000 calories, but depending on what you eat not all of those calories are going to be burnt as fuel or stored as fat for use as fuel later.
Therefore technically you can eat more calories and still lose weight (I shouldn't think you can eat massive amounts over) but probably going over by a hundred or so calories shouldn't stop weight loss.
Unless you are going over your TDEE for a specific reason, such as bulking in preparation for a cut, it seems silly to me to have the attitude that you can go over your calorie goal by about 100 and if you eat certain types of food you will not gain weight. In fact, it's plain old misinformation.0 -
Tennisdude's favorite new theory is that you can go over maintenance on calories all the time and not gain weight.
The reasoning in the past has been this is because of resistance starches, where all of the calories eaten don't actually get digested and absorbed.
It's kind of amusing. He seems to enjoy learning some new "theory" every now and then and touting it for a couple of weeks on the forum like it's some incredible revelation before forgetting about it and moving on.
I'm not advocating eating more calories to loss weight. I am merely pointing out the OP may be talking about calories EATEN as opposed to calories DIGESTED, as the statement of Eat less calories is technically incorrect - although it is something that is best observed.
And yes I was talking about resistant starches, although I do not believe - like you do - that a hot boiled potatoes will magically halve in calorific value when it cools down - only special snowflakes believe that one!0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions