A Personal View on Exercise Cals and Underfeeding

Options
178101213

Replies

  • carmenstop1
    carmenstop1 Posts: 210 Member
    Options
    Your story and mine are so alike~ I made every mistake that can be made in the weight loss world!

    Bump!!!
  • brenott
    brenott Posts: 117 Member
    Options
    Bump
  • SHBoss1673
    SHBoss1673 Posts: 7,161 Member
    Options
    I haven't read all the posts on here yet (but plan to as soon as I have time!) But I really wanted to ask; what's your take on intermittent fasting, Ladyhawk? Because what you were doing sounds a lot like IF, but if that's what damaged your metabolism then I am slightly concerned... Do you think it was the long period of time without food, or too little food, or a combination of both? I've been researching IF and ESE and have been trying it out for the last week or so with no ill effects, but your story does worry me... Did you gain weight WHILE eating 800-1200cals and only at night, or did something change? Sorry if you've already been asked, I will read through the thread when I get time. Thanks :flowerforyou:

    ETA: So now I have read about half the posts, and it seems to me like maybe you were gaining because of the binges? Like you were keeping you body in fat storing mode because you weren't eating enough, but the reason you were gaining weight was because it was holding into the binge cals (and the day to day cals, but they wouldn't be enough to make you gain, would they?) I see a lot of people say they are gaining while eating very low calories which has never made sense to me, but now I'm think it's the times that they are eating more than their 'usual' cals which are making them gain, rather than the 800 or so calories they eat every day. Does that make sense? I mean even if you are in fat storing mode (I think the term starvation mode is greatly overused and exaggerated on this site, so I am making it clear what I am referring to) your body needs calories to survive, so it would take those 800cals to keep your body functioning. So if you stayed at a steady 800, you would either lose or maintain, not gain. There wouldn't be any spare calories for a gain. Sure your BMR would slow down and non essential functions would be shut down, but I still don't think you would gain unless you went over that 800 (or however many) and if you did, it would be minimal simply because there would be no calories to spare. I don't know, this is just what makes sense to me :s Any help would be appreciated :)

    What she was doing was more along the lines of Long Term Fasting or to be specific, Long Term Underfeeding as she wasn't actually fasting. Short term (intermittent fasting) is usually classified as less than 72 hours but usually less than 24 hours of no calorie intake. Which can be determined acceptable because of the glycogen repletion going on during the feeding periods.
  • marmitegirly2
    marmitegirly2 Posts: 35 Member
    Options
    I have not been on MFP for long but found in week 3 when I ate my exercise calories I didn't even lose a pound but when I ignore them or eat half, I lose weight. I would much prefer to eat them!

    Also, what's your take on Saturdays off? If I was at 1200 all week then did not 'diet' on Saturdays, would this stop my metabolism from slowing as one day in 7 would not be 'dieting'? I'm not talking binging, just letting go a little and enjoying a few treats.

    Many thanks for your interesting post and for other people's replies - thought provoking.
  • brit49
    brit49 Posts: 461 Member
    Options
    Was really worth the read. This is one of the best post I have read since joining this site. Well wrote and put fourth that even I can understand it.
  • ladyhawk00
    ladyhawk00 Posts: 2,457 Member
    Options
    I haven't read all the posts on here yet (but plan to as soon as I have time!) But I really wanted to ask; what's your take on intermittent fasting, Ladyhawk? Because what you were doing sounds a lot like IF, but if that's what damaged your metabolism then I am slightly concerned... Do you think it was the long period of time without food, or too little food, or a combination of both? I've been researching IF and ESE and have been trying it out for the last week or so with no ill effects, but your story does worry me... Did you gain weight WHILE eating 800-1200cals and only at night, or did something change? Sorry if you've already been asked, I will read through the thread when I get time. Thanks :flowerforyou:

    ETA: So now I have read about half the posts, and it seems to me like maybe you were gaining because of the binges? Like you were keeping you body in fat storing mode because you weren't eating enough, but the reason you were gaining weight was because it was holding into the binge cals (and the day to day cals, but they wouldn't be enough to make you gain, would they?) I see a lot of people say they are gaining while eating very low calories which has never made sense to me, but now I'm think it's the times that they are eating more than their 'usual' cals which are making them gain, rather than the 800 or so calories they eat every day. Does that make sense? I mean even if you are in fat storing mode (I think the term starvation mode is greatly overused and exaggerated on this site, so I am making it clear what I am referring to) your body needs calories to survive, so it would take those 800cals to keep your body functioning. So if you stayed at a steady 800, you would either lose or maintain, not gain. There wouldn't be any spare calories for a gain. Sure your BMR would slow down and non essential functions would be shut down, but I still don't think you would gain unless you went over that 800 (or however many) and if you did, it would be minimal simply because there would be no calories to spare. I don't know, this is just what makes sense to me :s Any help would be appreciated :)

    What she was doing was more along the lines of Long Term Fasting or to be specific, Long Term Underfeeding as she wasn't actually fasting. Short term (intermittent fasting) is usually classified as less than 72 hours but usually less than 24 hours of no calorie intake. Which can be determined acceptable because of the glycogen repletion going on during the feeding periods.

    Ah... Thank you for clearing that up :) I've been intermittent fasting for no more than 24hrs at a time so I'm glad it isn't the same thing :) Thanks for the response!

    Yes, as Banks said it was LTUF, not IF.

    And yes, the reason for the gain is

    1) Decreased metabolism - (Just using generic numbers for example here) If maintenance cals when healthy are 2000, and through underfeeding they get lowered to 1400, then I now HAVE to eat only 1400 to maintain. Also, it's not just RMR that may decrease - cals burned through activity level will be decreased as well, because typically when you are at that much of a deficit and burning muscle, you have less energy on a daily basis, so you tend to be much less active overall and therefore burn even fewer cals on a daily basis.
    2) Binges/carb loading - If metabolism is decreased, and maintenance cals are much lower, but there are occasional binges (and especially if they are mostly simple carbs), the body has been trained to store fat easier, and will immediately shuttle that large intake to fat storage.

    However, I want to point out here that there are a LOT of other issues with this other than just the weight gain. Psychological, hormonal, bone density...the list goes on and on, and I experienced (and am still going through) a lot of them. It's not enjoyable. And avoiding the binges doesn't remove all of the risks/drawbacks.
  • ladyhawk00
    ladyhawk00 Posts: 2,457 Member
    Options
    I have not been on MFP for long but found in week 3 when I ate my exercise calories I didn't even lose a pound but when I ignore them or eat half, I lose weight. I would much prefer to eat them!

    Also, what's your take on Saturdays off? If I was at 1200 all week then did not 'diet' on Saturdays, would this stop my metabolism from slowing as one day in 7 would not be 'dieting'? I'm not talking binging, just letting go a little and enjoying a few treats.

    Many thanks for your interesting post and for other people's replies - thought provoking.

    If you've been at too large of a deficit (either from dieting or simple underfeeding) for a significant period, it is common and expected to see no loss or even a gain when you begin eating sufficient calories again. However, this is usually temporary and within a few weeks the loss will usually start again.

    Having a "free" or "spike" day is fine, IMO, and usually helpful (if it's not taken too far). However, I couldn't tell you how it would affect you without a lot more specific info about your situation:

    Height, weight, age, activity level (for work and home)
    Current weight, goal weight
    Access to diary
    Your exercise program (ie type, frequency, length, intensity)

    The reason being that if your deficit is too large, then one day of refeeding won't necessarily undo all the damage - or, conversely, if your deficit is too conservative, then a day of refeeding can conceivably cause no loss/gain. So we'd need to figure out if 1200 is the appropriate deficit for you to begin with.
  • ladyhawk00
    ladyhawk00 Posts: 2,457 Member
    Options
    Was really worth the read. This is one of the best post I have read since joining this site. Well wrote and put fourth that even I can understand it.

    Thank you! Glad you liked it. :smile:
  • SHBoss1673
    SHBoss1673 Posts: 7,161 Member
    Options
    I have not been on MFP for long but found in week 3 when I ate my exercise calories I didn't even lose a pound but when I ignore them or eat half, I lose weight. I would much prefer to eat them!

    Also, what's your take on Saturdays off? If I was at 1200 all week then did not 'diet' on Saturdays, would this stop my metabolism from slowing as one day in 7 would not be 'dieting'? I'm not talking binging, just letting go a little and enjoying a few treats.

    Many thanks for your interesting post and for other people's replies - thought provoking.

    this usually means you have your calorie deficit wrong, or there is something else going on (medical or other) but usually it's just either an incorrect calorie deficit, or one of the numbers is incorrect (or you aren't calculating your calories right). MFP's a great tool, but it's not intuitive, by that I mean, you have to put in the right numbers to receive the right results.
  • kettlenic
    kettlenic Posts: 148 Member
    Options
    bump for later
  • 2youngatheart
    2youngatheart Posts: 338 Member
    Options
    Great info! Thank you!
  • ladyhawk00
    ladyhawk00 Posts: 2,457 Member
    Options
    I haven't read all the posts on here yet (but plan to as soon as I have time!) But I really wanted to ask; what's your take on intermittent fasting, Ladyhawk? Because what you were doing sounds a lot like IF, but if that's what damaged your metabolism then I am slightly concerned... Do you think it was the long period of time without food, or too little food, or a combination of both? I've been researching IF and ESE and have been trying it out for the last week or so with no ill effects, but your story does worry me... Did you gain weight WHILE eating 800-1200cals and only at night, or did something change? Sorry if you've already been asked, I will read through the thread when I get time. Thanks :flowerforyou:

    ETA: So now I have read about half the posts, and it seems to me like maybe you were gaining because of the binges? Like you were keeping you body in fat storing mode because you weren't eating enough, but the reason you were gaining weight was because it was holding into the binge cals (and the day to day cals, but they wouldn't be enough to make you gain, would they?) I see a lot of people say they are gaining while eating very low calories which has never made sense to me, but now I'm think it's the times that they are eating more than their 'usual' cals which are making them gain, rather than the 800 or so calories they eat every day. Does that make sense? I mean even if you are in fat storing mode (I think the term starvation mode is greatly overused and exaggerated on this site, so I am making it clear what I am referring to) your body needs calories to survive, so it would take those 800cals to keep your body functioning. So if you stayed at a steady 800, you would either lose or maintain, not gain. There wouldn't be any spare calories for a gain. Sure your BMR would slow down and non essential functions would be shut down, but I still don't think you would gain unless you went over that 800 (or however many) and if you did, it would be minimal simply because there would be no calories to spare. I don't know, this is just what makes sense to me :s Any help would be appreciated :)

    What she was doing was more along the lines of Long Term Fasting or to be specific, Long Term Underfeeding as she wasn't actually fasting. Short term (intermittent fasting) is usually classified as less than 72 hours but usually less than 24 hours of no calorie intake. Which can be determined acceptable because of the glycogen repletion going on during the feeding periods.

    Ah... Thank you for clearing that up :) I've been intermittent fasting for no more than 24hrs at a time so I'm glad it isn't the same thing :) Thanks for the response!

    Yes, as Banks said it was LTUF, not IF.

    And yes, the reason for the gain is

    1) Decreased metabolism - (Just using generic numbers for example here) If maintenance cals when healthy are 2000, and through underfeeding they get lowered to 1400, then I now HAVE to eat only 1400 to maintain. Also, it's not just RMR that may decrease - cals burned through activity level will be decreased as well, because typically when you are at that much of a deficit and burning muscle, you have less energy on a daily basis, so you tend to be much less active overall and therefore burn even fewer cals on a daily basis.
    2) Binges/carb loading - If metabolism is decreased, and maintenance cals are much lower, but there are occasional binges (and especially if they are mostly simple carbs), the body has been trained to store fat easier, and will immediately shuttle that large intake to fat storage.

    However, I want to point out here that there are a LOT of other issues with this other than just the weight gain. Psychological, hormonal, bone density...the list goes on and on, and I experienced (and am still going through) a lot of them. It's not enjoyable. And avoiding the binges doesn't remove all of the risks/drawbacks.

    How many carbs would be considered carb loading? What were you eating to be carb loading?

    I wouldn't say there's a specific number (but likely a significant amount more than normal), but probably more about the source of the carbs. And again, we're not talking about intentional carb loading (as an athlete does before a big competition/race.) The majority of my binges (which were not all that frequent, or massive binges) would be with something like homemade cookies, cereal, or crackers.
  • NewVonnie
    NewVonnie Posts: 683 Member
    Options
    Thanks so much, lovely read!! It taught me a lot. ( by the way..love your username..My fave movie!!)
  • Hearts_2015
    Hearts_2015 Posts: 12,031 Member
    Options
    Thanks!:flowerforyou:

    Bumpin to read later:wink:
  • runningneo122
    runningneo122 Posts: 6,962 Member
    Options
    Big Bump-a-roo
  • ladyhawk00
    ladyhawk00 Posts: 2,457 Member
    Options
    Big Bump-a-roo

    Bumpalicious :tongue: