Why I won't eat fish (seafood)

1246

Replies

  • kristy_estes21
    kristy_estes21 Posts: 434 Member
    This sounds like something that would be reported on Fox News. haha!!
  • phinners
    phinners Posts: 524 Member
    There are a lot of SAFE fish one can eat. I wouldn't stop eating all fish, heck I even eat Tuna once a week. If you go that route you might as well ban beef, because of cholesterol and mad cow. I'm not seriously suggesting this btw, just making a point that there are endless studies out there that point to one food being harmful in one way or another. Research the risks and make your own decisions.

    But here is the thing. Would you rather have brain damage or heart disease? You can fix cardiovascular disease, you can't fix your brain.

    Here is another new york times article on mercury, it is a bit more recent.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/14/health/research/14hazards.html?ref=mercuryintuna
    Dude it's a newspaper, haven't you any links to peer reviewed articles that are far more credible than a newspaper?
  • phinners
    phinners Posts: 524 Member
    What about farm-raised fish? Lower in mercury, better for the environment due to overfishing...I like it.

    I agree that fish without mercury is great. No argument from me.
    Whereas Queen without Mercury is just wrong :(
  • thkelly
    thkelly Posts: 466 Member
    it's good for you
    it will kill you
    it's good for you
    it will kill you

    it seems like you can have this discussion about almost everything we put in our bodies these days.

    maybe i should just stop breathing too because the air quality is getting worse all the time and that's probably affecting my health.
  • phinners
    phinners Posts: 524 Member
    it's good for you
    it will kill you
    it's good for you
    it will kill you

    it seems like you can have this discussion about almost everything we put in our bodies these days.

    maybe i should just stop breathing too because the air quality is getting worse all the time and that's probably affecting my health.
    Breathing gives you cancer, everybody knows that ;P





    BIG WINK just in case anyone thinks I'm being serious here!! (you know what this bloody place can be like)
  • ninpiggy
    ninpiggy Posts: 228 Member
    What about farm-raised fish? Lower in mercury, better for the environment due to overfishing...I like it.

    I agree that fish without mercury is great. No argument from me.

    Whereas Queen without Mercury is just wrong :(

    Bahaha! Love it.
  • phinners
    phinners Posts: 524 Member
    :D
  • taem
    taem Posts: 495 Member
    I get so incredibly tired of people overblowing the Mercury thing way out of proportion.

    You have to eat an insane amount of fish including tunafish over a long period of time (YEARS) to be affected by the mercury.

    It's getting really ridiculous. It's like people not wanting to use smartphones anymore because of the cancer thing.
    It's kinda like the fear of drinking too much water. For most people, it would be near impossible to do so.

    Here is another article about the reluctance of labeling mercury warnings on can tuna and the (biased organization) Oceana with regards to mercury in tuna.

    http://dinersjournal.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/24/national-study-finds-high-levels-of-mercury-in-tuna/?scp=28&sq=boy mercury poisoning&st=cse

    Here is a youtube video on a local news group testing mercury in their area.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2BHzpHlNeQ&feature=related

    This ABC's report and it includes a story about a boy whose mercury levels affected him. So, yes you can get sick more quickly than you thought, but the good news is, there is a way to know how much poison you are eating.

    Still, that defies some logic of health, but oh well.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JbvwuHi_K4&NR=1

    Here is a 2009 report on mercury in the USA.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=an3xRjL_Q5U&feature=related
    "While fish gets most of the bad press regarding mercury, other food products also contain mercury. In early 2009, Environmental Health Journal reported on a study conducted by a team led by Renee Dufault that found high fructose corn syrup had high levels of mercury. Many mass-marketed food products contain high fructose corn syrup due the prevalence of corn production in America and the government's corn subsidy. Popular products sweetened with high fructose corn syrup include most sodas, ketchup and even bread."


    Read more: Foods Containing Mercury | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/about_5376461_foods-containing-mercury.html#ixzz1U4qDrmGd


    So do you not eat any ketchup or bread????

    Once I learned that aspartame contains a toxic substance that is not binded with other chemicals and is not inert naturally?, I stopped eating aspartame.

    High fructose corn syrup, on the other hand is not a toxic substance, it can be eaten in moderation. However, I am on a diet to lose weight and HFCS is not good for me because of my diet.

    My point about me not eating seafood or any food that has a poison is pretty logical. I won't eat poison, no matter the level.

    Jamie Oliver's food revolution has an episode where he demonstrates how to make chicken nuggets: we use the empty shell of a chicken (skin and bones after the wings, breasts and so forth are taken out), then that carcase is then finely blended, then breaded (don't forget the ammonia and other colorings) and then cooked. He asked the children in LA if they would eat it and they all said they would because they were hungry.

    Now, people here say that even though they know that they are eating food with mercury poisoning, they would still eat it, even though they don't know the mercury levels. Now, I did post a video url of an ABC and CBS news television show showing that there are unacceptable levels of mercury found in our fish and that the fish are not labeled so that consumers don't know how much mercury is in the fish they are eating. There is one company that checks each fish's mercury levels but not many retailers are using this system.

    Again, I am going to say this. I will not eat a food that contains poison. The news show tells us that we do not know the specific amounts of mercury per fish and that the charts given is not reliable, as mercury levels in fish are not the same. I am not taking any chances.

    If those that don't know how much mercury they are eating say a chart is telling them it's okay, fine. I am not stopping them.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    I've always wondered why we never hear warnings that seaweed contains mercury, yet it grows in the same seawater as the fishes.
  • taem
    taem Posts: 495 Member
    it's good for you
    it will kill you
    it's good for you
    it will kill you

    it seems like you can have this discussion about almost everything we put in our bodies these days.

    maybe i should just stop breathing too because the air quality is getting worse all the time and that's probably affecting my health.
    Breathing gives you cancer, everybody knows that ;P





    BIG WINK just in case anyone thinks I'm being serious here!! (you know what this bloody place can be like)

    It is funny, but you know, if your children comes home from school with breathing problems because of a chemical plant spewing out harmful chemicals in the air, that won't be funny.
  • taem
    taem Posts: 495 Member
    I dare anyone here to go into google, and type "why is...insert food here...bad for you"

    See? We'd all be dead if we followed this reasoning. You know the saying "you pick your poison?"

    Here is a bottle of poison, would you eat it? What if I included a bottle of fat and protein and told you it's good for you? Would you eat it still? Now let me charge you money for it and say you can eat 1 can of it a day, would you eat it? give it to your children or grandchildren?

    Poison + Fat + Protein + moderation = something I don't eat. That's my decision, I hope it is yours as well.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    I dare anyone here to go into google, and type "why is...insert food here...bad for you"

    See? We'd all be dead if we followed this reasoning. You know the saying "you pick your poison?"

    Here is a bottle of poison, would you eat it? What if I included a bottle of fat and protein and told you it's good for you? Would you eat it still? Now let me charge you money for it and say you can eat 1 can of it a day, would you eat it? give it to your children or grandchildren?

    Poison + Fat + Protein + moderation = something I don't eat. That's my decision, I hope it is yours as well.

    Personally, I don't care if you eat fish or not. But seriously, there is not the equivalent of even a small "bottle" of poison if you ate fish every day for year. If it bothers you then don't eat it, but why exaggerate? I like fish.
  • taem
    taem Posts: 495 Member
    If we are going that route, tilapia and catfish may not be healthy for us according to some recent research. The cons may outweigh the pros nutritionally.

    If one is worried about parasites, chicken probably isn't all that safe compared to fish, though I would want to look for some research in this area.

    For the record, I eat lots of types of animals. I also read research papers, opinion pieces, and other articles with a grain of salt, so to speak. Everyone has an agenda. It's pretty difficult to find "unbiased" reports. People are funny like that.

    You are right. Even the US agencies are at odds with each other, the FDA and the EPA.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/23/opinion/23tue3.html?ref=mercuryintuna

    No offense taem, but posting links to "nytimes.com" isn't exactly reputable. Their opinions and bloggers. Let's post some expert advice and/or facts.

    I'd like to hear what Alan Aragon, Lyle McDonald, and Martin Berkhan have to say about Mercury and Fish. Also the NIH studies.

    +10 respect for listing all my favourite fitness/nutrition experts in one go



    http://www.epa.gov/mercury/advisories.htm

    They have toned down their message but say this and I quote.

    "The degree of exposure to mercury is derived from both the amount and the type of fish eaten. The key factor to an individual's health is related to the amount and type of fish the individual consumes."

    Both amount and type of fish eaten, there was a poster here that said he could eat 1 can of tuna a day and it would be okay. It is to each individual to decided, but I know what I would do, and that's not eat any amount of any level of mercury.

    The youtube video of the news television special report on the SF Bay Area states that those living in California consume more fish (seafood) then the rest of the US. I won't summarize it here since the video isn't that long.
  • phinners
    phinners Posts: 524 Member
    it's good for you
    it will kill you
    it's good for you
    it will kill you

    it seems like you can have this discussion about almost everything we put in our bodies these days.

    maybe i should just stop breathing too because the air quality is getting worse all the time and that's probably affecting my health.
    Breathing gives you cancer, everybody knows that ;P





    BIG WINK just in case anyone thinks I'm being serious here!! (you know what this bloody place can be like)

    It is funny, but you know, if your children comes home from school with breathing problems because of a chemical plant spewing out harmful chemicals in the air, that won't be funny.
    No it wont be, so its a good job that their mother is a Masters qualified scientist with 12 years experience in science and medicine and so can read peer reviewed articles instead of relying on newspapers, TV shows and generalised scare mongering for my MIS-information.
  • taem
    taem Posts: 495 Member
    I dare anyone here to go into google, and type "why is...insert food here...bad for you"

    See? We'd all be dead if we followed this reasoning. You know the saying "you pick your poison?"

    Here is a bottle of poison, would you eat it? What if I included a bottle of fat and protein and told you it's good for you? Would you eat it still? Now let me charge you money for it and say you can eat 1 can of it a day, would you eat it? give it to your children or grandchildren?

    Poison + Fat + Protein + moderation = something I don't eat. That's my decision, I hope it is yours as well.

    Personally, I don't care if you eat fish or not. But seriously, there is not the equivalent of even a small "bottle" of poison if you ate fish every day for year. If it bothers you then don't eat it, but why exaggerate? I like fish.

    How am I exaggerating? We all know there is poison in the seafood. Go ahead and eat it if you like.
  • taem
    taem Posts: 495 Member
    it's good for you
    it will kill you
    it's good for you
    it will kill you

    it seems like you can have this discussion about almost everything we put in our bodies these days.

    maybe i should just stop breathing too because the air quality is getting worse all the time and that's probably affecting my health.
    Breathing gives you cancer, everybody knows that ;P





    BIG WINK just in case anyone thinks I'm being serious here!! (you know what this bloody place can be like)

    It is funny, but you know, if your children comes home from school with breathing problems because of a chemical plant spewing out harmful chemicals in the air, that won't be funny.
    No it wont be, so its a good job that their mother is a Masters qualified scientist with 12 years experience in science and medicine and so can read peer reviewed articles instead of relying on newspapers, TV shows and generalised scare mongering for my MIS-information.

    So I guess you would eat the poisonous food and give it to your children? Good for you. Thanks for your opinion.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    I dare anyone here to go into google, and type "why is...insert food here...bad for you"

    See? We'd all be dead if we followed this reasoning. You know the saying "you pick your poison?"

    Here is a bottle of poison, would you eat it? What if I included a bottle of fat and protein and told you it's good for you? Would you eat it still? Now let me charge you money for it and say you can eat 1 can of it a day, would you eat it? give it to your children or grandchildren?

    Poison + Fat + Protein + moderation = something I don't eat. That's my decision, I hope it is yours as well.

    Personally, I don't care if you eat fish or not. But seriously, there is not the equivalent of even a small "bottle" of poison if you ate fish every day for year. If it bothers you then don't eat it, but why exaggerate? I like fish.

    How am I exaggerating? We all know there is poison in the seafood. Go ahead and eat it if you like.

    Consuming "a bottle of poison with added fat and protein" = eating fish. That is an exaggeration. A pretty big one.
  • fteale
    fteale Posts: 5,310 Member
    I won't eat fish, because I detest the fishing industry, and if I could ban one thing in the world it would be trawler fishing.
  • phinners
    phinners Posts: 524 Member
    it's good for you
    it will kill you
    it's good for you
    it will kill you

    it seems like you can have this discussion about almost everything we put in our bodies these days.

    maybe i should just stop breathing too because the air quality is getting worse all the time and that's probably affecting my health.
    Breathing gives you cancer, everybody knows that ;P





    BIG WINK just in case anyone thinks I'm being serious here!! (you know what this bloody place can be like)

    It is funny, but you know, if your children comes home from school with breathing problems because of a chemical plant spewing out harmful chemicals in the air, that won't be funny.
    No it wont be, so its a good job that their mother is a Masters qualified scientist with 12 years experience in science and medicine and so can read peer reviewed articles instead of relying on newspapers, TV shows and generalised scare mongering for my MIS-information.

    So I guess you would eat the poisonous food and give it to your children? Good for you. Thanks for your opinion.
    Amazing how you have turned into an ar5ehole suddenly. Good for you.
  • taem
    taem Posts: 495 Member
    I dare anyone here to go into google, and type "why is...insert food here...bad for you"

    See? We'd all be dead if we followed this reasoning. You know the saying "you pick your poison?"

    Here is a bottle of poison, would you eat it? What if I included a bottle of fat and protein and told you it's good for you? Would you eat it still? Now let me charge you money for it and say you can eat 1 can of it a day, would you eat it? give it to your children or grandchildren?

    Poison + Fat + Protein + moderation = something I don't eat. That's my decision, I hope it is yours as well.

    Personally, I don't care if you eat fish or not. But seriously, there is not the equivalent of even a small "bottle" of poison if you ate fish every day for year. If it bothers you then don't eat it, but why exaggerate? I like fish.

    How am I exaggerating? We all know there is poison in the seafood. Go ahead and eat it if you like.

    Consuming "a bottle of poison with added fat and protein" = eating fish. That is an exaggeration. A pretty big one.

    You are not quoting me correctly. But maybe the meaning of that isn't clear so I apologize if it isn't, let me clarify.

    I won't eat any poison at any level, at any type of frequency, even if it comes from a natural source. It is after all, poison. Now, you can eat it, I am stating why I won't.
  • End6ame
    End6ame Posts: 903
    Here is a bottle of poison, would you eat it? What if I included a bottle of fat and protein and told you it's good for you? Would you eat it still? Now let me charge you money for it and say you can eat 1 can of it a day, would you eat it? give it to your children or grandchildren?

    Poison + Fat + Protein + moderation = something I don't eat. That's my decision, I hope it is yours as well.

    Do you use compact florescent light bulbs? Guess what there is mercury in those and if they are broken can expose everyone in the room to mercury. That being said, the mercury contained in them is very small so the benefits outweigh the risks. You drive to work because the benefits of a job outweigh the risks of a car accident. We use air travel because the speed and convenience outweigh the risks of crashing. It is all about risk management, and the mercury in fish debate is the same. The health benefits of fish outweigh the risks of mercury poisoning, so much so that people have been doing it for centuries with very little over exposure to mercury.
  • taem
    taem Posts: 495 Member
    it's good for you
    it will kill you
    it's good for you
    it will kill you

    it seems like you can have this discussion about almost everything we put in our bodies these days.

    maybe i should just stop breathing too because the air quality is getting worse all the time and that's probably affecting my health.
    Breathing gives you cancer, everybody knows that ;P





    BIG WINK just in case anyone thinks I'm being serious here!! (you know what this bloody place can be like)

    It is funny, but you know, if your children comes home from school with breathing problems because of a chemical plant spewing out harmful chemicals in the air, that won't be funny.
    No it wont be, so its a good job that their mother is a Masters qualified scientist with 12 years experience in science and medicine and so can read peer reviewed articles instead of relying on newspapers, TV shows and generalised scare mongering for my MIS-information.

    So I guess you would eat the poisonous food and give it to your children? Good for you. Thanks for your opinion.
    Amazing how you have turned into an ar5ehole suddenly. Good for you.

    Look, I am sorry you think I am what you think I am, but I gave urls from government agencies that show mercury levels, that are updated. I also showed a university's video on mercury's affect on brain neurons. And then I showed a video where a device measuring mercury levels on individual fish that the consumer typically eats. You then said that you are qualified and that what I presented is not accurate. So what can I conclude but that you won't look at the reports I have given or you are creating an air of superiority. Either way, you are stating that it's okay to eat fish with trace mercury. I can only reply by saying to go ahead with your actions. How am I being negative?
  • armaretta
    armaretta Posts: 851 Member
    Dude, if you didn't want to stir the $*&t pot, then this kind of information could have been written in your own PERSONAL BLOG. This is a public forum. If you don't want to start an argument, then stop arguing. Tossing up articles and options about a controversial topic in a a place where you expect others to read/hear/or reply to it, is the very definition of looking for an argument. If you don't want to cause arguments, then you don't bring up controversial topics in a public forum. You can't sugar-coat your intentions either. Stop trying to pass off a turd as a chocolate bar. You are entitled to your opinion just like everyone else, but when someone disagrees with you, you can't turn an opposing opinion into a completely wrong fact. That is why it's called an opinion and not a fact.

    That being said, you seem like the type that considers an argument a " heated discussion." If you guys ignore him, he'll stop or lose interest.

    Also, EVERYTHING is bad for you in excess. I think that's why a lot of us are here. We were excessively eating, being lazy, or a combination of the two. No offense to the people who have genuine health problems attributing to their reasons for being here. Again, EVERYTHING is bad in excess. Sun, water, food, alcohol, oxygen. Everything is a potential poison. Now, excuse me while I finish my mercury sandwich.
  • taem
    taem Posts: 495 Member
    Here is a bottle of poison, would you eat it? What if I included a bottle of fat and protein and told you it's good for you? Would you eat it still? Now let me charge you money for it and say you can eat 1 can of it a day, would you eat it? give it to your children or grandchildren?

    Poison + Fat + Protein + moderation = something I don't eat. That's my decision, I hope it is yours as well.

    Do you use compact florescent light bulbs? Guess what there is mercury in those and if they are broken can expose everyone in the room to mercury. That being said, the mercury contained in them is very small so the benefits outweigh the risks. You drive to work because the benefits of a job outweigh the risks of a car accident. We use air travel because the speed and convenience outweigh the risks of crashing. It is all about risk management, and the mercury in fish debate is the same. The health benefits of fish outweigh the risks of mercury poisoning, so much so that people have been doing it for centuries with very little over exposure to mercury.

    To use mercury for light bulbs, I can say we do it all the time. However, when a light bulb breaks, we are very cautious and weary about its disposal. I believe mercury can be used for products when used safely.

    I certainly won't eat it.
  • taem
    taem Posts: 495 Member
    Dude, if you didn't want to stir the $*&t pot, then this kind of information could have been written in your own PERSONAL BLOG. This is a public forum. If you don't want to start an argument, then stop arguing. Tossing up articles and options about a controversial topic in a a place where you expect others to read/hear/or reply to it, is the very definition of looking for an argument. If you don't want to cause arguments, then you don't bring up controversial topics in a public forum. You can't sugar-coat your intentions either. Stop trying to pass off a turd as a chocolate bar. You are entitled to your opinion just like everyone else, but when someone disagrees with you, you can't turn an opposing opinion into a completely wrong fact. That is why it's called an opinion and not a fact.

    That being said, you seem like the type that considers an argument a " heated discussion." If you guys ignore him, he'll stop or lose interest.

    Also, EVERYTHING is bad for you in excess. I think that's why a lot of us are here. We were excessively eating, being lazy, or a combination of the two. No offense to the people who have genuine health problems attributing to their reasons for being here. Again, EVERYTHING is bad in excess. Sun, water, food, alcohol, oxygen. Everything is a potential poison. Now, excuse me while I finish my mercury sandwich.

    But mercury isn't a potential poison, it is a poison.

    As for your other comments, you are probably right but this forum is also about nutrition and I believe we should discuss the ramifications of poison in our food. Why do we eat poison? Why do we drink bottled or filtered water?

    Someone mentioned about breathing air, I'm pretty sure there will be air products for us to breath soon enough. I mean there are air filtering products for our homes.

    When it comes to fish though, it is like everyone says it's okay to eat it. I simply stated and tried to prove that there is poison in the seafood and I won't eat it.

    I am glad you are eating the mercury sandwich.
  • End6ame
    End6ame Posts: 903
    At this point….
    Care-Map.jpg
  • Scoobies87
    Scoobies87 Posts: 379
    Everything these days causes cancer/some type of illness/is bad for you in some way.

    I want to live the life I have rather then worrying about everything.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    I am glad you are eating the mercury sandwich.

    Mercury sandwich. heehee. This is all making hungry for some mercury tacos! Just curious, do you think Green Giant frozen niblets corn don't have poisons sprayed on them?
  • taem
    taem Posts: 495 Member
    I love fish:) I think the Japanese totally have it right with sushi. PERFECT. HEALTHY. AWESOME. A little bit of rice (low fat) with a big old chunk of raw fish (lean protein) wrapped in Nori (seaweed....yum-o) and dipped in some wasabi. There is no food on he planet better IMO.

    You are right, the Japanese (pre disaster) were not afraid of mercury in their (tuna) shushi.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/health/27iht-japan.1.9522347.html?scp=1&sq=mercury in fish in japan&st=cse

    However and I quote:

    "I wouldn't worry about it," Ukiuchi said, strolling through Tokyo's main fish market Friday. "We're not talking about eating 10 tuna sushi every day - in which case I might be a little bit worried."
  • taem
    taem Posts: 495 Member
    I read on the boards that fish is great for us because of the nutrition and fats they can offer.

    Here is a video on mercury effects on neurons (not human I don't think)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6E-OUMVMNI&NR=1

    Here is the FDA response on mercury for pregnant women.
    http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/product-specificinformation/seafood/foodbornepathogenscontaminants/methylmercury/ucm115662.htm

    I can't believe the FDA wants pregnant women to feel safe eating fish!
    Aren't you also a vegetarian? If you are then aren't you just spewing anti meat propoganda?

    I quit eating meat in July, but I am not against beef like I am for seafood. If i decided to give up being a vegan, I still wouldn't eat seafood. With beef, cook it thoroughly and no bacteria--simple. With seafood, you have to fight against unknown levels of poison and you have to try and get rid of it from your body--not so simple.
This discussion has been closed.