What do you burn with your chest strap HRM?

Options
12346»

Replies

  • bek416
    bek416 Posts: 9 Member
    Options
    I don't trust what my new ft7 said I burned in step class this morning. I know I push, and I still have about 30 pounds to lose... but it seemed as though my heart rate seemed high... often high 180s and even 190. I found myself dropping my risers to bring it down... which it did... but only by about 10 bps. This is a class I have been doing for 4 years and is very intense... but not THAT intense... Even with my extra weight.

    I read another forum that said to tighten your strap if your rate seems high so I am going to try that next time. My high was 193 with an average of 174 and that was because I was deliberately trying to bring it down which was a little boring for me... I like to get into it! I want to trust my HRM... bot I don't think I burned over 600 calories in 50 minutes of step... no matter how intense.... I am 42 and have all my stats entered correctly... and I even raised my max heart rate in the settings as advised on another MFP thread to get more accurate stats.... I know it will take awhile, but I really want to figure this thing out!

    Have you ever used a HRM before though? The reason I ask is because out perceived rate of exertion is often much higher than what our heart rate says. In other words, we don't have to work as hard as we thought to stay in that fat burning zone. When we go above that percentage, my understanding was always that we were getting into protein stores to get the energy needed to sustain this higher heart rates. I only have interest in burning fat, and not working too hard. When we work too hard, we run the risk of overtraining, injury or just plain hating the exercise we are doing. This is exactly why I bought one, because as I suspected, I was working harder than I needed to be and since I am genuinely trying to make this a way of life, I want don't want to burn out.
  • PoochPottery
    Options
    Ah yes, welcome to the more accurate (and often disappointing) world of chest strap HRMs :)

    These are correct. Machines and MFP inflate caloric burn because they're simply not as accurate.

    Is it disappointing? Yes.
    Is it more truthful? Yes.
    Would you rather know what you're *really* burning (and can then eat or not eat, accordingly)? YES.

    This is a good thing, even if it sort of sucks (okay, it sucks a lot).

    YEP!! It sucks but it keeps you accountable! You can't cheat your body into thinking you burned more than you actually did.
  • Rahul_ahuja
    Options
    BTW does anyone know how to transfer workouts to computer for an ft7? I can't figure it out.. is there another part I need? lol probably sounds stupid!

    Yes u need polar flowlink in order to transfer your data to polar website
  • mrsjennifermaffei
    Options
    I have the polar ft4 also and I typically burn 10 calories per minute no matter what I do.
  • lawmama_
    lawmama_ Posts: 103 Member
    Options
    i'm getting the same numbers you are for the same types of exercises, done for the same amount of time. we just have to get used to the fact that MFP and treadmills/ellipitcals/etc. were all overlogging how many calories were really burned during the workout. after i got the heart rate monitor, it became very obvious to me that i really wasn't burning all those calories MFP said i was. sometimes it's wrong by 200%!
  • sandy729
    sandy729 Posts: 232 Member
    Options
    Bump
  • georgia98_98
    georgia98_98 Posts: 123 Member
    Options
    I have the ft7 & mine is a little higher then mfp...Make sure u wet the ele. bands well... I do Bob's boot Camp from the biggest loser & burn around 350 for 30 mins. I am 5 7 237lbs.. 30 yrs. old!
  • MyaPapaya75
    MyaPapaya75 Posts: 3,143 Member
    Options
    trust the hrm ....its way more accurate than mfp...especially if you have chest strap...mfp told me 590 was burned for my kickbox....polar says 190..i would rather be under than over
  • missym357
    missym357 Posts: 210 Member
    Options
    I have the Polar FT7 and tend to burn between 400 and 450 cals per hour depending on the intensity- for cardio I mostly do zumba classes, tabata-style interval classes, and stairmill. I am very petite though at 5'2" and 100-103 lbs. My heart rate averages 150 and maxes around 175. I always knew I was not burning what mfp says simply because I am smaller than average.
  • GTOgirl1969
    GTOgirl1969 Posts: 2,527 Member
    Options
    I have the polar ft4 also and I typically burn 10 calories per minute no matter what I do.

    That's pretty close to true for me. I also have the FT4, and I have all the Turbo Jam DVDs, a few Jillian Michaels workouts, EA Sports Active and UFC Trainer. There's also a walking trail near my house. For Turbo Jam and JM, I burn about 8-10 calories no matter which workout I choose, the same goes for EA Sports Active. The only time I've ever burned more than ten calories a minute is doing the UFC Trainer (game for Wii).
  • doublezizzle
    doublezizzle Posts: 42 Member
    Options
    If you follow the Jillian Michael's school of thinking...there is no such thing as a "fat burning zone". in order to get the best results, you need to push yourself as hard as you can go. you will burn more calories and lose more weight overall if you push to your max, rather than try to stay in your fat burning "zone".

    I am in the low 200s and my heart rate gets pretty high. For an hour of Zumba, and I go all out...it tells me I burn anywhere from 800-1000 calories.
  • Butterfly3730
    Options
    I have a Polar FT4 and it is way under the machines at the gym and MFP. However, when I am at the higher end of my heart training zone (120 - 144), then I burn more calories so I work on staying up there but I do go over if I'm doing interval training or a more intense workout. I burn from 200 - 250 calories for 30 minutes now (I had to work my way up to that). And the 2nd 30 minutes I burn 300 - 350 calories. I'm 5'9 / 229 lbs / age: 51
  • lynne_p
    lynne_p Posts: 173 Member
    Options
    I also have the Polar FT4 which I received this week. Today was the second time I have used it. It kept saying to check the signal while I was working out. Maybe I didn't have it positioned properly?

    Anyway, the first time I used it, I was surprised at the calorie burn. It was way lower than what MFP has set and also way lower than what my treadmill said. I guess I have been over-estimating my calorie burn all this time.
  • mwestonp
    mwestonp Posts: 77 Member
    Options
    I haven't done Turbo Jam, but if you're looking for averages for comparison sake, I use a Suunto M4 with a chest strap. I burn about 800 calories per hour (depending on intensity) on the elliptical machine with a heart rate range of 140-160 bpm. I burn around 400 calories per hour lifting weights (again, depending on intensity) with a wide heart rate range of 90-135 bpm.

    Hope it helps.
  • akjmart2002
    akjmart2002 Posts: 263 Member
    Options
    See and I've been wondering the same thing because mine says I burn way more than I thought I did. I jogged for 20 minutes and it said I burned 350 calories... I usually take whatever the machines at the gym tell me and cut it in half, but my HRM says they were right on all along. I'm 193 and 5'8" I have always had a really high heart rate though, even resting, so IDK how accurate it really is or if I am just a freak of nature haha. As my doctor always tells me, my body does things that aren't supposed to be physically possible, but usually when I'm jogging even if I'm not super winded my HR is around 195...

    The HRM will estimate your calories burned as a function of what percentage of your maximum HR your average measured HR was. If you naturally have a high heart rate, then you may need to up your estimated max HR in the HRM to avoid skewing your results.
  • chell53
    chell53 Posts: 356 Member
    Options
    I have FT4 and love it..............I am 56 weigh 185 and I burn anywhere from 150 to 260..............I guess it depends on how much energy you put forward I don't know..........I know when I am at the point I can't speak then I am at my highest and I keep the HR at the max............
  • AnaVerasGettingFit
    AnaVerasGettingFit Posts: 109 Member
    Options
    I have a Suunto T1 that I've had for years. The heart rate is accurate- it always matches up to the machines at the gym. I use the activity class 5 on it. The Activity Class describes overall physical activity. It varies from 0 to 10 and is needed to calculate the most accurate kcal and training effect. My average burn is 100 calories every 10 minutes. Yesterday I only had 30 minutes to work out before my second job so I pushed it and did 510 calories in that half hour. I don't think you should compare yourself to other people too much, since everyone is at such different levels. If we all work hard, we will see results eventually. Looking at others who might be getting to where they want to be to what looks to us as quicker or easier would only be discouraging.
  • suzzann666
    suzzann666 Posts: 334 Member
    Options
    Used mine today for the first time, and I am having the opposite problem. During my workout at the gym I did 15 minutes of intervals on the treadmill (7mph/3.5mph), 5 minutes at 4.0 mph on a steep incline, 10 minutes on the eliptical machine, then around 45 minutes of upper body strength training (supersets with minimal rest in between) and my HRM claims that I burned 1050 calories. Yes, I worked my *kitten* off, but this seems high to me.
  • AnaVerasGettingFit
    AnaVerasGettingFit Posts: 109 Member
    Options
    I don't know what your size is or what fitness level you're at, but both of those things seem to play a role (the bodies of people who are larger or have more muscle burn more calories, even at rest) - so I believe your HRM!