Meat eating vs. Vegan debate
Replies
-
I have never stated fast food is cheaper (thats to another poster who had posted about that), if anything fast food is expensive and people who do think its cheaper are probably people who are just thinking on how much they get (portion size) which really isn't good and unhealthy.
in the event that you meant me as other poster, I didn't think you said that I understood you were saying the same thing I was saying, I forget what I was responding to exactly.
and you're right: growing your own lowers costs considerably. and it's FUN!
But still, no, I don't miss meat and no, I'm not trying to convince anyone to switch to a vegetarian diet, though I do think it is a better way to go in general.0 -
Yeah, but when people go veg, they tend to eat a whole lot of beans. All that fiber... Do you know what they mean when they say there's a log in the fire? Just sayin...
>>this girl<< gets it!
and beans ain't got nothin' on broccoli, yo! whooooo!0 -
Yeah, but when people go veg, they tend to eat a whole lot of beans. All that fiber... Do you know what they mean when they say there's a log in the fire? Just sayin...
>>this girl<< gets it!
and beans ain't got nothin' on broccoli, yo! whooooo!0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.0
-
food prices vary by region but also do costs of living / wages and other factors. In the end it comes out about the same... I have been researching this for over a decade: a vegetarian diet based on whole foods is (without question) less expensive than a "typical" American diet.
It is a perpetuated myth that it is cheaper to buy fast food. Not only is it a myth in actual cash expenditure, it is a myth in other factors including health costs, driving costs, environmental costs and landfill costs.
I will make the exclusion one more time, for those that missed it: there are very real existences where fresh food is not readily available. In those cases, my argument is invalid. I don't want anyone to think that I don't recognize that food deserts exist, but that is a completely different set of values to discuss.
Yes, if you're just comparing it to fast food and depends what you consider a typical American diet. Many poor people can't afford fast food.
On the contrary, the crap that MacDonnalds sells is specifically targeted at poor people. $1 burger, $1 fries, $1 soda. What the poor can't afford are health clubs, vegetarian restaurants, and fresh fruit. The reason they can't afford fresh fruit is because they generally have only mom and pop neighborhood stores, not large supermarkets. Mom and Pop stores sell crap because that is what sells.
The poor in the United States are in pathetic shape. They are more overweight, diabetic and chronically ill than any other class. That is because the morons who run our country and who we keep electing have brought about institutionalized bread and circuses : meat and dairy subsidies. They dump all the crap they can't sell into public school cafeterias, they subsidize meat so MacDonnalds can make a fortune, and they don't bother to teach the poor about nutrition. Of course the government is at fault, but the poor themselves are to blame. With the Internet they should be able to find out what is good and wha tis bad, and help themselves.
But I suppose, from what I've seen here, from a relatively health conscious group, even interested and educated people are capable of coming to foolish conclusions.0 -
Of course.
For instance, in the USA right now, many fast foods are actually cheaper than fresh fruits and vegetables PER CALORIE. But, IN GENERAL, dried beans, homemade bread, rice and other whole foods can allow you to eat frugally. Convenience faux 'meats' and the like, tend to be much more expensive than their animal flesh counterparts.
per calorie, yes; per pound, no. you know?
so yeah, you can get a $1 burger (gross) and $1 french fry, but in an hour from that point, you'll be hungry again and bloated from salt. add $1 coke to the mix and you're reaching dehydration levels compared to a 1.5lbs of broccoli or cauliflower, which could last you several meals, keep you satiated and provide many nutrients, no salt & plenty of fiber.
I totally agree. But poor people who are desperate to make their money stretch may not be thinking things through. Many cultures rely on beans, rice and vegetables to feed themselves economically. Many cuisines reflect that deliciously: Asian, Indian, Mexican, Ethiopian, to name a few,
And those are foods that are in their region which reflect price.
@Rhea30: You seem determined to make this point that food prices vary on the region. For the second time, I am agreeing with you--it's true that food prices vary by region. It's obvious you think this is an important point, but I have a question for you: do you think plant-food staples like beans, rice, flour, etc. are very expensive in relationship to animal products in some areas of the world? I'm not talking fragile, highly perishable produce. I'm talking shelf-stable whole foods that can be found in bulk bins at natural food stores or in the middle sections of the grocery stores.
Just as bread is heavily subsidized in France to make it affordable by all, the meat and dairy industries are heavily subsidized here in the USA to make those products artificially inexpensive (relative to the true production cost). So, in essence, US citizens are all paying a tax to keep certain prices deflated.
I am not hoping to make one-on-one comparisons on the cost of soybeans in the UK vs the northeastern US. Rather, I am hoping to give a glimpse into what we do here, since I think many people have no idea what goes on in a vegan household. Even here, I am sure I could go to an exclusive specialty food shop and pay a LOT for a small sack of soybeans wrapped with a colorful ribbon on top, but all I can do is make reasonable descriptions of how a budget-conscious vegan family behaves.
Its a point when one is claiming veggies are less expensive, it depends on the item itself and where, that's all I'm saying. And then it depends if you feel its healthy or not to just live off those types of food which we would clash.
Veggies ARE less expensive. The only reason it does not appear so is that our Sheetheaded politicians subsidize meat and dairy, so we all pay a tax to keep that industry profitable. If we had a free market in food, you sure would see the difference. Everywhere. And the country would be a lot healthier.0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.
Yup. Your free to eat meat, do drugs and smoke. But please, just don't come to me for health care.0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.
Yup. Your free to eat meat, do drugs and smoke. But please, just don't come to me for health care.
As I've stated with myself, I eat more meat now and I'm in better shape when it comes to my health. Maybe you should of paid for my healthcare when I was hardly touching meat then and my health was going downhill. Also to your fast food, what you mentioned would of been a 3 dollar meal for one person, that's still a lot of money when you have a family, you got to find staple foods when you're poor that last and stretch, fast food doesn't do it.0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.
Yup. Your free to eat meat, do drugs and smoke. But please, just don't come to me for health care.
As I've stated with myself, I eat more meat now and I'm in better shape when it comes to my health. Maybe you should of paid for my healthcare when I was hardly touching meat then and my health was going downhill. Also to your fast food, what you mentioned would of been a 3 dollar meal for one person, that's still a lot of money when you have a family, you got to find staple foods when you're poor that last and stretch, fast food doesn't do it.
And just what healthcare did you need from a vegetarian diet? This I have got to hear. Did you get cancer from carrots? Diabetes from date pumbs? Heart disase from Harvard Beets? I've met many people who claimed that they got weaker because they ate vegetarian. Maybe they did. Or maybe it was just in their mind. As a vegetarian, I have run marathons, skiied the Alps, the West (Taos) and every major resort in New England, and Mont Tremblant. I got my black belt in Shaolin Kempo Karate. I bike dozens of miles a week. I work out. Gee, I guess my body is just radically different from everyone elses. Oh, yeah, and I am 69 years old. a vegetarian since 1979, and I have never felt better. How long exactly were you vegetarian?
Oh, and if you think $3 per person for a meal is expensive, then I would seriously like to know how you feed your family for less.0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.
Yup. Your free to eat meat, do drugs and smoke. But please, just don't come to me for health care.
As I've stated with myself, I eat more meat now and I'm in better shape when it comes to my health. Maybe you should of paid for my healthcare when I was hardly touching meat then and my health was going downhill. Also to your fast food, what you mentioned would of been a 3 dollar meal for one person, that's still a lot of money when you have a family, you got to find staple foods when you're poor that last and stretch, fast food doesn't do it.
And just what healthcare did you need from a vegetarian diet? This I have got to hear. Did you get cancer from carrots? Diabetes from date pumbs? Heart disase from Harvard Beets? I've met many people who claimed that they got weaker because they ate vegetarian. Maybe they did. Or maybe it was just in their mind. As a vegetarian, I have run marathons, skiied the Alps, the West (Taos) and every major resort in New England, and Mont Tremblant. I got my black belt in Shaolin Kempo Karate. I bike dozens of miles a week. I work out. Gee, I guess my body is just radically different from everyone elses. Oh, yeah, and I am 69 years old. a vegetarian since 1979, and I have never felt better. How long exactly were you vegetarian?
Oh, and if you think $3 per person for a meal is expensive, then I would seriously like to know how you feed your family for less.
By the by, not to get off topic, but I studied a little martial arts, myself. I prefer the more 'traditional' approach of learning with an actual teacher over a mail order black belt with every purchase of an instructional DVD method that SKK uses. Anyway, back to soy beans and cancer.0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.
Yup. Your free to eat meat, do drugs and smoke. But please, just don't come to me for health care.
As I've stated with myself, I eat more meat now and I'm in better shape when it comes to my health. Maybe you should of paid for my healthcare when I was hardly touching meat then and my health was going downhill. Also to your fast food, what you mentioned would of been a 3 dollar meal for one person, that's still a lot of money when you have a family, you got to find staple foods when you're poor that last and stretch, fast food doesn't do it.
And just what healthcare did you need from a vegetarian diet? This I have got to hear. Did you get cancer from carrots? Diabetes from date pumbs? Heart disase from Harvard Beets? I've met many people who claimed that they got weaker because they ate vegetarian. Maybe they did. Or maybe it was just in their mind. As a vegetarian, I have run marathons, skiied the Alps, the West (Taos) and every major resort in New England, and Mont Tremblant. I got my black belt in Shaolin Kempo Karate. I bike dozens of miles a week. I work out. Gee, I guess my body is just radically different from everyone elses. Oh, yeah, and I am 69 years old. a vegetarian since 1979, and I have never felt better. How long exactly were you vegetarian?
Oh, and if you think $3 per person for a meal is expensive, then I would seriously like to know how you feed your family for less.
Yeah, he died. In all likelihood Jobs likely had Pancreatic Cancer since his 20s and when he became a vegan, that probably prolonged his life. The Vegan diet is not a cure for cancer, it is a preventative, and Jobs was handling toxic chemicals since he built his first computer in his garage in his 20's. I know of lots of cases of people who are diagnosed with cancer and THEN become vegans. The time to get religion is before you get a disease like cancer. And in any case everybody dies. In Jobs case it was probably his exposure to heavy metals from hand building the first Apples that caused the cancer. This was long before he became a vegan.
I feel sorry for Jobs because he believed strongly that the vegan diet would save him, and others have made the same mistake. The Vegan diet may extent your life after you get cancer, but it is no cure for cancer.
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters. Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.
Yup. Your free to eat meat, do drugs and smoke. But please, just don't come to me for health care.
As I've stated with myself, I eat more meat now and I'm in better shape when it comes to my health. Maybe you should of paid for my healthcare when I was hardly touching meat then and my health was going downhill. Also to your fast food, what you mentioned would of been a 3 dollar meal for one person, that's still a lot of money when you have a family, you got to find staple foods when you're poor that last and stretch, fast food doesn't do it.
And just what healthcare did you need from a vegetarian diet? This I have got to hear. Did you get cancer from carrots? Diabetes from date pumbs? Heart disase from Harvard Beets? I've met many people who claimed that they got weaker because they ate vegetarian. Maybe they did. Or maybe it was just in their mind. As a vegetarian, I have run marathons, skiied the Alps, the West (Taos) and every major resort in New England, and Mont Tremblant. I got my black belt in Shaolin Kempo Karate. I bike dozens of miles a week. I work out. Gee, I guess my body is just radically different from everyone elses. Oh, yeah, and I am 69 years old. a vegetarian since 1979, and I have never felt better. How long exactly were you vegetarian?
Oh, and if you think $3 per person for a meal is expensive, then I would seriously like to know how you feed your family for less.
Yeah, he died. In all likelihood Jobs likely had Pancreatic Cancer since his 20s and when he became a vegan, that probably prolonged his life. The Vegan diet is not a cure for cancer, it is a preventative, and Jobs was handling toxic chemicals since he built his first computer in his garage in his 20's. I know of lots of cases of people who are diagnosed with cancer and THEN become vegans. The time to get religion is before you get a disease like cancer. And in any case everybody dies. In Jobs case it was probably his exposure to heavy metals from hand building the first Apples that caused the cancer. This was long before he became a vegan.
I feel sorry for Jobs because he believed strongly that the vegan diet would save him, and others have made the same mistake. The Vegan diet may extent your life after you get cancer, but it is no cure for cancer.
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters. Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.
You had previously claimed it makes you immune to cancer.0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.
Yup. Your free to eat meat, do drugs and smoke. But please, just don't come to me for health care.
As I've stated with myself, I eat more meat now and I'm in better shape when it comes to my health. Maybe you should of paid for my healthcare when I was hardly touching meat then and my health was going downhill. Also to your fast food, what you mentioned would of been a 3 dollar meal for one person, that's still a lot of money when you have a family, you got to find staple foods when you're poor that last and stretch, fast food doesn't do it.
And just what healthcare did you need from a vegetarian diet? This I have got to hear. Did you get cancer from carrots? Diabetes from date pumbs? Heart disase from Harvard Beets? I've met many people who claimed that they got weaker because they ate vegetarian. Maybe they did. Or maybe it was just in their mind. As a vegetarian, I have run marathons, skiied the Alps, the West (Taos) and every major resort in New England, and Mont Tremblant. I got my black belt in Shaolin Kempo Karate. I bike dozens of miles a week. I work out. Gee, I guess my body is just radically different from everyone elses. Oh, yeah, and I am 69 years old. a vegetarian since 1979, and I have never felt better. How long exactly were you vegetarian?
Oh, and if you think $3 per person for a meal is expensive, then I would seriously like to know how you feed your family for less.
Yeah, he died. In all likelihood Jobs likely had Pancreatic Cancer since his 20s and when he became a vegan, that probably prolonged his life. The Vegan diet is not a cure for cancer, it is a preventative, and Jobs was handling toxic chemicals since he built his first computer in his garage in his 20's. I know of lots of cases of people who are diagnosed with cancer and THEN become vegans. The time to get religion is before you get a disease like cancer. And in any case everybody dies. In Jobs case it was probably his exposure to heavy metals from hand building the first Apples that caused the cancer. This was long before he became a vegan.
I feel sorry for Jobs because he believed strongly that the vegan diet would save him, and others have made the same mistake. The Vegan diet may extent your life after you get cancer, but it is no cure for cancer.
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters. Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.
You had previously claimed it makes you immune to cancer.
I doubt that. It certainly cannot make you immune to something you already have. Statistically, vegetarianism gives you less suseptibility to cancer than a lifestyle that involves eating meat. That is certain and statiscially shown. Immune may be too strong a word, but less susceptible is certainly true.
But let's get back to what you said. I asked you some questions, for example what health problems did you have as a vegetarian, how long were you a vegetarian, and how do you feed a family for less than $3 per person per meal, particularly with meat.
I am particularly interested in how long you were a vegetarian : months? weeks? days? minutes? What diseases did you catch from the vegetables? If you were just feeling weak, how do you know it wasn't all in your head? Again, inquiring minds want to know.0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.
Yup. Your free to eat meat, do drugs and smoke. But please, just don't come to me for health care.
As I've stated with myself, I eat more meat now and I'm in better shape when it comes to my health. Maybe you should of paid for my healthcare when I was hardly touching meat then and my health was going downhill. Also to your fast food, what you mentioned would of been a 3 dollar meal for one person, that's still a lot of money when you have a family, you got to find staple foods when you're poor that last and stretch, fast food doesn't do it.
And just what healthcare did you need from a vegetarian diet? This I have got to hear. Did you get cancer from carrots? Diabetes from date pumbs? Heart disase from Harvard Beets? I've met many people who claimed that they got weaker because they ate vegetarian. Maybe they did. Or maybe it was just in their mind. As a vegetarian, I have run marathons, skiied the Alps, the West (Taos) and every major resort in New England, and Mont Tremblant. I got my black belt in Shaolin Kempo Karate. I bike dozens of miles a week. I work out. Gee, I guess my body is just radically different from everyone elses. Oh, yeah, and I am 69 years old. a vegetarian since 1979, and I have never felt better. How long exactly were you vegetarian?
Oh, and if you think $3 per person for a meal is expensive, then I would seriously like to know how you feed your family for less.
Yeah, he died. In all likelihood Jobs likely had Pancreatic Cancer since his 20s and when he became a vegan, that probably prolonged his life. The Vegan diet is not a cure for cancer, it is a preventative, and Jobs was handling toxic chemicals since he built his first computer in his garage in his 20's. I know of lots of cases of people who are diagnosed with cancer and THEN become vegans. The time to get religion is before you get a disease like cancer. And in any case everybody dies. In Jobs case it was probably his exposure to heavy metals from hand building the first Apples that caused the cancer. This was long before he became a vegan.
I feel sorry for Jobs because he believed strongly that the vegan diet would save him, and others have made the same mistake. The Vegan diet may extent your life after you get cancer, but it is no cure for cancer.
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters. Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.
Yup. Your free to eat meat, do drugs and smoke. But please, just don't come to me for health care.
As I've stated with myself, I eat more meat now and I'm in better shape when it comes to my health. Maybe you should of paid for my healthcare when I was hardly touching meat then and my health was going downhill. Also to your fast food, what you mentioned would of been a 3 dollar meal for one person, that's still a lot of money when you have a family, you got to find staple foods when you're poor that last and stretch, fast food doesn't do it.
And just what healthcare did you need from a vegetarian diet? This I have got to hear. Did you get cancer from carrots? Diabetes from date pumbs? Heart disase from Harvard Beets? I've met many people who claimed that they got weaker because they ate vegetarian. Maybe they did. Or maybe it was just in their mind. As a vegetarian, I have run marathons, skiied the Alps, the West (Taos) and every major resort in New England, and Mont Tremblant. I got my black belt in Shaolin Kempo Karate. I bike dozens of miles a week. I work out. Gee, I guess my body is just radically different from everyone elses. Oh, yeah, and I am 69 years old. a vegetarian since 1979, and I have never felt better. How long exactly were you vegetarian?
Oh, and if you think $3 per person for a meal is expensive, then I would seriously like to know how you feed your family for less.
Yeah, he died. In all likelihood Jobs likely had Pancreatic Cancer since his 20s and when he became a vegan, that probably prolonged his life. The Vegan diet is not a cure for cancer, it is a preventative, and Jobs was handling toxic chemicals since he built his first computer in his garage in his 20's. I know of lots of cases of people who are diagnosed with cancer and THEN become vegans. The time to get religion is before you get a disease like cancer. And in any case everybody dies. In Jobs case it was probably his exposure to heavy metals from hand building the first Apples that caused the cancer. This was long before he became a vegan.
I feel sorry for Jobs because he believed strongly that the vegan diet would save him, and others have made the same mistake. The Vegan diet may extent your life after you get cancer, but it is no cure for cancer.
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters. Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.
You seem obsessed with the fact that Steve Jobs died of pancreatic cancer. Did you know he had neuroendocrine cancer before that. And yes, 30 to 40 years of survival is possible.
http://eliminatecancer.hubpages.com/hub/If-Steve-Jobs-was-Vegan-Why-Did-He-Die-of-Cancer0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.
Yup. Your free to eat meat, do drugs and smoke. But please, just don't come to me for health care.
As I've stated with myself, I eat more meat now and I'm in better shape when it comes to my health. Maybe you should of paid for my healthcare when I was hardly touching meat then and my health was going downhill. Also to your fast food, what you mentioned would of been a 3 dollar meal for one person, that's still a lot of money when you have a family, you got to find staple foods when you're poor that last and stretch, fast food doesn't do it.
And just what healthcare did you need from a vegetarian diet? This I have got to hear. Did you get cancer from carrots? Diabetes from date pumbs? Heart disase from Harvard Beets? I've met many people who claimed that they got weaker because they ate vegetarian. Maybe they did. Or maybe it was just in their mind. As a vegetarian, I have run marathons, skiied the Alps, the West (Taos) and every major resort in New England, and Mont Tremblant. I got my black belt in Shaolin Kempo Karate. I bike dozens of miles a week. I work out. Gee, I guess my body is just radically different from everyone elses. Oh, yeah, and I am 69 years old. a vegetarian since 1979, and I have never felt better. How long exactly were you vegetarian?
Oh, and if you think $3 per person for a meal is expensive, then I would seriously like to know how you feed your family for less.
Yeah, he died. In all likelihood Jobs likely had Pancreatic Cancer since his 20s and when he became a vegan, that probably prolonged his life. The Vegan diet is not a cure for cancer, it is a preventative, and Jobs was handling toxic chemicals since he built his first computer in his garage in his 20's. I know of lots of cases of people who are diagnosed with cancer and THEN become vegans. The time to get religion is before you get a disease like cancer. And in any case everybody dies. In Jobs case it was probably his exposure to heavy metals from hand building the first Apples that caused the cancer. This was long before he became a vegan.
I feel sorry for Jobs because he believed strongly that the vegan diet would save him, and others have made the same mistake. The Vegan diet may extent your life after you get cancer, but it is no cure for cancer.
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters. Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.
You seem obsessed with the fact that Steve Jobs died of pancreatic cancer. Did you know he had neuroendocrine cancer before that. And yes, 30 to 40 years of survival is possible.
http://eliminatecancer.hubpages.com/hub/If-Steve-Jobs-was-Vegan-Why-Did-He-Die-of-Cancer0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.
Yup. Your free to eat meat, do drugs and smoke. But please, just don't come to me for health care.
As I've stated with myself, I eat more meat now and I'm in better shape when it comes to my health. Maybe you should of paid for my healthcare when I was hardly touching meat then and my health was going downhill. Also to your fast food, what you mentioned would of been a 3 dollar meal for one person, that's still a lot of money when you have a family, you got to find staple foods when you're poor that last and stretch, fast food doesn't do it.
And just what healthcare did you need from a vegetarian diet? This I have got to hear. Did you get cancer from carrots? Diabetes from date pumbs? Heart disase from Harvard Beets? I've met many people who claimed that they got weaker because they ate vegetarian. Maybe they did. Or maybe it was just in their mind. As a vegetarian, I have run marathons, skiied the Alps, the West (Taos) and every major resort in New England, and Mont Tremblant. I got my black belt in Shaolin Kempo Karate. I bike dozens of miles a week. I work out. Gee, I guess my body is just radically different from everyone elses. Oh, yeah, and I am 69 years old. a vegetarian since 1979, and I have never felt better. How long exactly were you vegetarian?
Oh, and if you think $3 per person for a meal is expensive, then I would seriously like to know how you feed your family for less.
Yeah, he died. In all likelihood Jobs likely had Pancreatic Cancer since his 20s and when he became a vegan, that probably prolonged his life. The Vegan diet is not a cure for cancer, it is a preventative, and Jobs was handling toxic chemicals since he built his first computer in his garage in his 20's. I know of lots of cases of people who are diagnosed with cancer and THEN become vegans. The time to get religion is before you get a disease like cancer. And in any case everybody dies. In Jobs case it was probably his exposure to heavy metals from hand building the first Apples that caused the cancer. This was long before he became a vegan.
I feel sorry for Jobs because he believed strongly that the vegan diet would save him, and others have made the same mistake. The Vegan diet may extent your life after you get cancer, but it is no cure for cancer.
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters. Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.
You seem obsessed with the fact that Steve Jobs died of pancreatic cancer. Did you know he had neuroendocrine cancer before that. And yes, 30 to 40 years of survival is possible.
http://eliminatecancer.hubpages.com/hub/If-Steve-Jobs-was-Vegan-Why-Did-He-Die-of-Cancer
Okay, sorry. I thought you were saying that since Steve Jobs died, and he was a vegan, that being a vegan has nothing to do with preventing cancer. Jobs, unfortunately, was either cursed with genes that made him susceptible to cancer, or, likely his contact with toxic chemicals before it was realized how carcenogenic they were doomed him. I personally liked Jobs very much, and feel very bad that he died.
The article cited gives a pretty good idea of what likely happened, although there is no way to prove anything one way or the other.0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.
Yup. Your free to eat meat, do drugs and smoke. But please, just don't come to me for health care.
As I've stated with myself, I eat more meat now and I'm in better shape when it comes to my health. Maybe you should of paid for my healthcare when I was hardly touching meat then and my health was going downhill. Also to your fast food, what you mentioned would of been a 3 dollar meal for one person, that's still a lot of money when you have a family, you got to find staple foods when you're poor that last and stretch, fast food doesn't do it.
And just what healthcare did you need from a vegetarian diet? This I have got to hear. Did you get cancer from carrots? Diabetes from date pumbs? Heart disase from Harvard Beets? I've met many people who claimed that they got weaker because they ate vegetarian. Maybe they did. Or maybe it was just in their mind. As a vegetarian, I have run marathons, skiied the Alps, the West (Taos) and every major resort in New England, and Mont Tremblant. I got my black belt in Shaolin Kempo Karate. I bike dozens of miles a week. I work out. Gee, I guess my body is just radically different from everyone elses. Oh, yeah, and I am 69 years old. a vegetarian since 1979, and I have never felt better. How long exactly were you vegetarian?
Oh, and if you think $3 per person for a meal is expensive, then I would seriously like to know how you feed your family for less.
Yeah, he died. In all likelihood Jobs likely had Pancreatic Cancer since his 20s and when he became a vegan, that probably prolonged his life. The Vegan diet is not a cure for cancer, it is a preventative, and Jobs was handling toxic chemicals since he built his first computer in his garage in his 20's. I know of lots of cases of people who are diagnosed with cancer and THEN become vegans. The time to get religion is before you get a disease like cancer. And in any case everybody dies. In Jobs case it was probably his exposure to heavy metals from hand building the first Apples that caused the cancer. This was long before he became a vegan.
I feel sorry for Jobs because he believed strongly that the vegan diet would save him, and others have made the same mistake. The Vegan diet may extent your life after you get cancer, but it is no cure for cancer.
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters. Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.
You had previously claimed it makes you immune to cancer.
I doubt that. It certainly cannot make you immune to something you already have. Statistically, vegetarianism gives you less suseptibility to cancer than a lifestyle that involves eating meat. That is certain and statiscially shown. Immune may be too strong a word, but less susceptible is certainly true.
But let's get back to what you said. I asked you some questions, for example what health problems did you have as a vegetarian, how long were you a vegetarian, and how do you feed a family for less than $3 per person per meal, particularly with meat.
I am particularly interested in how long you were a vegetarian : months? weeks? days? minutes? What diseases did you catch from the vegetables? If you were just feeling weak, how do you know it wasn't all in your head? Again, inquiring minds want to know.
I've talked a bit about it in a post above and I gave an example above as well about feeding a person for under 3 dollars per meal with meat. Right now I've made a batch of turkey zucchini burgers (got the idea from Skinnytaste.com btw!). I use 2lbs ground turkey, it cost me close to 6 dollars (it was 5 something), the two zucchinis cost me .77 cents (for both, not each) and I use one onion but I dont know the cost of one onion since I have a bag of them which cost me close to 1.50 (for the bag) so I'll just add in .30 cents for the onion (I'm estimating high).
I'm able to yield 10-14 patties from this, so if I use 10 patties that's about .70 cents for the one patty and I'm lucky I'm close to a store where a loaf of bread cost me .98 cents which the loaf has 22 slices so using two slices cost around .44 cents. That feeds me at 1.14, and I can add on the side either broccoli which I got, a can of green beans which was only around .70 cents and I wouldn't eat the whole can or a breaburn apple I had bought for .40 cents. Either way it comes out to under 3 dollars and its a balanced meal that included meat and I'm sure I could find even cheaper ground meat if I wanted too since turkey is normally a higher price then beef.
Even with something like pork chops, I don't recall what kind I use to get but I use to be able to get a pretty large pack for 5 dollars and it was enough to feed 5 people and once again just add some side veggies or potatoes and it comes out to under 3 dollars per person. There's all sorts of things you can do to feed people a meal under 3 dollars that includes meat. Chicken legs is another one you can get as well.0 -
I've been from vegan to meat hound and back again. We used to raise rabbits and chickens to eat. Nothing like watching your dad go pop your bunny with a .22 for dinner when you're 4. We used to have 3 acres of vegetables to help support the family.
Now i've a balanced diet in the middle
1) I feed a family of 5 on local farm raised foods (meat, dairy, poultry). I get 50 pounds of food for about 3.00 a pound. That's a lot of food. Lasts a few weeks
2) I get local (when possible) fruits and vegetables from farmers markets. I grow some myself as well. I like it, it's fun. Makes me feel all special when it happens.
I say all that to say this:
Each person has to chose the life that works for him or her. It's the self rightous on both sides of the fence that come across just like the ultra-religious right and ultra-athiest eat the babies people. You're not going to change anyones mind. Live your life as you see fit, and change the world one person at a time - not through a message board.0 -
Each time I see a topic like this, I want to reply, and then I think should I? I'm going to do it and hope I don't get dogpiled.
I have been a vegetarian or pescatarian for 20 years. That is half my life.
I have been overweight for most of the last 10 years. ::GASP!:: I know, right? Fat vegetarian.
People assume that if you're a vegetarian, you can't be overweight and you must be healthy. Not true. If you're sedentary, you can get fat. If you consume too much food, you can get fat. If you drink alcohol, you can get fat. If you eat a ton of processed crap - even if it doesn't have meat in it - you can get fat.
AND, you can spend your entire life living cleanly, and still end up with cancer.
It's kind of silly to go about making assumptions or generalizations on either end of the spectrum.
I look at the practice of putting something into my body as being as personal as my religion. I would never, ever presume to tell someone else how to eat.
I choose to not eat animals or birds. I prepare them for my husband because he chooses to eat meat. (And he is quite lovely about eating vegetarian most of the time, too, I might add.) And when I do, I purchase high quality, independently produced, "friendly" meats whenever possible.
Do I wish he were a vegetarian? Do I wish it for you? How could I? It's personal, right?0 -
......
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters.]Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.
Can you cite at least one peer reviewed study supporting this assertion?0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.
Yup. Your free to eat meat, do drugs and smoke. But please, just don't come to me for health care.
As I've stated with myself, I eat more meat now and I'm in better shape when it comes to my health. Maybe you should of paid for my healthcare when I was hardly touching meat then and my health was going downhill. Also to your fast food, what you mentioned would of been a 3 dollar meal for one person, that's still a lot of money when you have a family, you got to find staple foods when you're poor that last and stretch, fast food doesn't do it.
And just what healthcare did you need from a vegetarian diet? This I have got to hear. Did you get cancer from carrots? Diabetes from date pumbs? Heart disase from Harvard Beets? I've met many people who claimed that they got weaker because they ate vegetarian. Maybe they did. Or maybe it was just in their mind. As a vegetarian, I have run marathons, skiied the Alps, the West (Taos) and every major resort in New England, and Mont Tremblant. I got my black belt in Shaolin Kempo Karate. I bike dozens of miles a week. I work out. Gee, I guess my body is just radically different from everyone elses. Oh, yeah, and I am 69 years old. a vegetarian since 1979, and I have never felt better. How long exactly were you vegetarian?
Oh, and if you think $3 per person for a meal is expensive, then I would seriously like to know how you feed your family for less.
Yeah, he died. In all likelihood Jobs likely had Pancreatic Cancer since his 20s and when he became a vegan, that probably prolonged his life. The Vegan diet is not a cure for cancer, it is a preventative, and Jobs was handling toxic chemicals since he built his first computer in his garage in his 20's. I know of lots of cases of people who are diagnosed with cancer and THEN become vegans. The time to get religion is before you get a disease like cancer. And in any case everybody dies. In Jobs case it was probably his exposure to heavy metals from hand building the first Apples that caused the cancer. This was long before he became a vegan.
I feel sorry for Jobs because he believed strongly that the vegan diet would save him, and others have made the same mistake. The Vegan diet may extent your life after you get cancer, but it is no cure for cancer.
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters. Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.
You seem obsessed with the fact that Steve Jobs died of pancreatic cancer. Did you know he had neuroendocrine cancer before that. And yes, 30 to 40 years of survival is possible.
http://eliminatecancer.hubpages.com/hub/If-Steve-Jobs-was-Vegan-Why-Did-He-Die-of-Cancer
Dr. John McDougall did an interesting analysis of the likely origins/progression of Steve Jobs' cancer. I will add that Dr. McDougall is biased in favor of a plant-based diet, but it is nonetheless a fascinating read:
http://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2011nl/nov/jobs.htm0 -
Torture means to inflict severe phsyical or mental pain upon. That is the dictionary defintion. Shooting an animal, particularly if the shot does not immediately kill the animal fits the definition. I never saw a hunter who was sober enough to kill on the first shot.
Problem with absolutes is that it just takes one black swan......
Agreed.
To the antagonist - if you truly don't know hunters who are sober when they hunt, then you only know trophy and tourist hunters. Real hunters that hunt for food know better than to be an idiot and handle high powered firearms while under the influence. Additionally, most food hunters will at least try to hit an area where the animal will die swiftly, and if they encounter one that is wounded to the point the hunter can approach it, but hasn't died, they will kill it with a shot to head to end its suffering.
Not only that, but many (if not most) food hunters aren't barbarians. In fact, they often have a very deep respect for animals, because they know that the animals are sacrificing their lives so that the hunters may live (yes, there are still some areas and situations, even in America, where people do, in fact, have to hunt in order to keep from starving).
That said, everything that is living dies eventually. Some slowly, some swiftly. Death is a part of life, there are worse things than it (such as torture; and yes, I do believe that torture and death are two totally different things). Nearly every living thing on this planet has to deprive another of food or life in order to live (yes, even plants, as they steal the nutrients from other plants; and yes, even herbivores and those that only eat seeds, because they maim and/or kill that which they eat or deprive the seed from becoming a new plant.
So true, I could not have explained it better.
Not only that, but many (if not most) serial killers aren't barbarians. In fact, they often have a very deep respect for humans, because they know that the humans are sacrificing their lives so that the serial killers may get pleasure (yes, there are still some areas and situations, even in America, where people do, in fact, have to kill in order to keep from going crazy).
I guess it depends on how you say it. There are plenty of edible wild plants that can be harvested. killing animals is always a choice, not a necessity.
...Except for the fact that serial killers are very often clinically psychopathic and therefore, by definition, have no respect for anyone (because they are incapable of feeling empathy).
Additionally, I'd like to see you live with the Inuit as a vegan and see just how feasible that actually is. Or feed a family of five in a Pennsylvania winter, when all the edible plants are hibernating and the ground is frozen under a foot of snow and you don't make enough money to put food on the table AND keep the heat on.0 -
I eat whatever I enjoy. I don't care whatever other people prefer. I live in a free country.
Yup. Your free to eat meat, do drugs and smoke. But please, just don't come to me for health care.
As I've stated with myself, I eat more meat now and I'm in better shape when it comes to my health. Maybe you should of paid for my healthcare when I was hardly touching meat then and my health was going downhill. Also to your fast food, what you mentioned would of been a 3 dollar meal for one person, that's still a lot of money when you have a family, you got to find staple foods when you're poor that last and stretch, fast food doesn't do it.
And just what healthcare did you need from a vegetarian diet? This I have got to hear. Did you get cancer from carrots? Diabetes from date pumbs? Heart disase from Harvard Beets? I've met many people who claimed that they got weaker because they ate vegetarian. Maybe they did. Or maybe it was just in their mind. As a vegetarian, I have run marathons, skiied the Alps, the West (Taos) and every major resort in New England, and Mont Tremblant. I got my black belt in Shaolin Kempo Karate. I bike dozens of miles a week. I work out. Gee, I guess my body is just radically different from everyone elses. Oh, yeah, and I am 69 years old. a vegetarian since 1979, and I have never felt better. How long exactly were you vegetarian?
Oh, and if you think $3 per person for a meal is expensive, then I would seriously like to know how you feed your family for less.
Yeah, he died. In all likelihood Jobs likely had Pancreatic Cancer since his 20s and when he became a vegan, that probably prolonged his life. The Vegan diet is not a cure for cancer, it is a preventative, and Jobs was handling toxic chemicals since he built his first computer in his garage in his 20's. I know of lots of cases of people who are diagnosed with cancer and THEN become vegans. The time to get religion is before you get a disease like cancer. And in any case everybody dies. In Jobs case it was probably his exposure to heavy metals from hand building the first Apples that caused the cancer. This was long before he became a vegan.
I feel sorry for Jobs because he believed strongly that the vegan diet would save him, and others have made the same mistake. The Vegan diet may extent your life after you get cancer, but it is no cure for cancer.
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters. Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.
You had previously claimed it makes you immune to cancer.
I doubt that. It certainly cannot make you immune to something you already have. Statistically, vegetarianism gives you less suseptibility to cancer than a lifestyle that involves eating meat. That is certain and statiscially shown. Immune may be too strong a word, but less susceptible is certainly true.
But let's get back to what you said. I asked you some questions, for example what health problems did you have as a vegetarian, how long were you a vegetarian, and how do you feed a family for less than $3 per person per meal, particularly with meat.
I am particularly interested in how long you were a vegetarian : months? weeks? days? minutes? What diseases did you catch from the vegetables? If you were just feeling weak, how do you know it wasn't all in your head? Again, inquiring minds want to know.
I've talked a bit about it in a post above and I gave an example above as well about feeding a person for under 3 dollars per meal with meat. Right now I've made a batch of turkey zucchini burgers (got the idea from Skinnytaste.com btw!). I use 2lbs ground turkey, it cost me close to 6 dollars (it was 5 something), the two zucchinis cost me .77 cents (for both, not each) and I use one onion but I dont know the cost of one onion since I have a bag of them which cost me close to 1.50 (for the bag) so I'll just add in .30 cents for the onion (I'm estimating high).
I'm able to yield 10-14 patties from this, so if I use 10 patties that's about .70 cents for the one patty and I'm lucky I'm close to a store where a loaf of bread cost me .98 cents which the loaf has 22 slices so using two slices cost around .44 cents. That feeds me at 1.14, and I can add on the side either broccoli which I got, a can of green beans which was only around .70 cents and I wouldn't eat the whole can or a breaburn apple I had bought for .40 cents. Either way it comes out to under 3 dollars and its a balanced meal that included meat and I'm sure I could find even cheaper ground meat if I wanted too since turkey is normally a higher price then beef.
Even with something like pork chops, I don't recall what kind I use to get but I use to be able to get a pretty large pack for 5 dollars and it was enough to feed 5 people and once again just add some side veggies or potatoes and it comes out to under 3 dollars per person. There's all sorts of things you can do to feed people a meal under 3 dollars that includes meat. Chicken legs is another one you can get as well.
I have to agree that that is certainly better than the $3 MacDonnald's meal of burger, fries and soda. My wife makes a similar kind of patty (vegan of course) substituting stuff she has left after making soy milk for the meat. They are FABULOUS, but I usually have about 5 or six at a sitting, along with veggies. We don't get canned veggies, but either fresh or frozen. I will have to ask her how much that meal costs, but it is probably more expensive than your $1.14 (I eat a lot more than you do). We also use either homemade bread (which is cheap) or Quinoa Flax bread (which is expensive). She also makes a soy yougurt which tastes like creme fraiche which she puts over strawberries, adding honey. God, is that good! Overall that is more expensive than yours but it is a different quantity, unless we use the homemade bread, more expensive bread, and an expensive dessert.0 -
I heard something about 'some bodybuilders consciously switching to a vegan diet' because the proteins found in plant and grown foods are much more beneficial for building. What are your thoughts?
Judging from what I've seen in the bodybuilding/lifting circles I frequent, I doubt that. There are only a couple of non-meat sources of complete proteins (namely, soy and quinoa), and the lifting community is basically soy-phobic due to the levels of phytoestrogens in soy, since estrogen keeps the body from building muscle. Most of these guys (and women) practically live off of eggs and chicken.
Do/may some switch for various reasons? Probably. I'm not seeing a wholesale "vegan is the way to go" change, though, if for no other reason than the cultural aspect (regardless of whether it's founded).0 -
......
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters.]Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.
Can you cite at least one peer reviewed study supporting this assertion?
Here is a position paper that cites dozens of studies:
http://www.vrg.org/nutrition/adapaper.htm
Here are others:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/jul/01/vegetarians-blood-cancer-diet-risk
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/5698784/Being-a-vegetarian-can-cut-your-risk-of-cancer-by-a-half-claim-scientists.html
http://vegsource.com/harris/cancer_vegdiet.htm
The major studies, the German study the China study, the Framingham study are not cited here. You can google those.0 -
......
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters.]Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.
Can you cite at least one peer reviewed study supporting this assertion?
Here is a position paper that cites dozens of studies:
http://www.vrg.org/nutrition/adapaper.htm
Here are others:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/jul/01/vegetarians-blood-cancer-diet-risk
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/5698784/Being-a-vegetarian-can-cut-your-risk-of-cancer-by-a-half-claim-scientists.html
http://vegsource.com/harris/cancer_vegdiet.htm
The major studies, the German study the China study, the Framingham study are not cited here. You can google those.
Had a look at several of the citations and saw the word correlation used frequently and we all know that correlation does not prove causation.
Interestingly :
"However, Allen urged caution over the interpretation of the findings. "It is a significant difference, but we should be a bit cautious since it is the first study showing that the risk of cancer of the blood is lower in vegetarians. We need to know what aspect of a fish and vegetarian diet is protecting against cancer. Is it the higher fibre intake, higher intake of fruit and vegetables, is it just meat per se?"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/jul/01/vegetarians-blood-cancer-diet-risk
I'd also be curious to see more information on the socio-economic status of the participants in the British as that has been determined to be a leading indicator or risk of premature death from all causes. We may be witnessing skewed results as the result of selection bias (ie are vegans more likely to avoid other behaviours that have been linked to cancer and heart disease risk?).
I also suspect that this:
"Cancer is not caused by bacteria, faulty diet, inadequate exercise, environmental contaminants, ionizing radiation, tobacco, viruses, nor heredity. "
http://vegsource.com/harris/cancer_vegdiet.htm
could be considered a minority opinion. (I wonder if the good doctor smokes? ) and even his conclusions stated "There is a modest negative correlation with these cancers and plant source food consumption."
So, back to my original question, perhaps phrased more precisely. Have there been any peer reviewed papers that prove causality between plant based diets and lower risk of cancer, heart disease etc?0 -
......
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters.]Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.
Can you cite at least one peer reviewed study supporting this assertion?
Here is a position paper that cites dozens of studies:
http://www.vrg.org/nutrition/adapaper.htm
Here are others:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/jul/01/vegetarians-blood-cancer-diet-risk
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/5698784/Being-a-vegetarian-can-cut-your-risk-of-cancer-by-a-half-claim-scientists.html
http://vegsource.com/harris/cancer_vegdiet.htm
The major studies, the German study the China study, the Framingham study are not cited here. You can google those.
Had a look at several of the citations and saw the word correlation used frequently and we all know that correlation does not prove causation.
Interestingly :
"However, Allen urged caution over the interpretation of the findings. "It is a significant difference, but we should be a bit cautious since it is the first study showing that the risk of cancer of the blood is lower in vegetarians. We need to know what aspect of a fish and vegetarian diet is protecting against cancer. Is it the higher fibre intake, higher intake of fruit and vegetables, is it just meat per se?"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/jul/01/vegetarians-blood-cancer-diet-risk
I'd also be curious to see more information on the socio-economic status of the participants in the British as that has been determined to be a leading indicator or risk of premature death from all causes. We may be witnessing skewed results as the result of selection bias (ie are vegans more likely to avoid other behaviours that have been linked to cancer and heart disease risk?).
I also suspect that this:
"Cancer is not caused by bacteria, faulty diet, inadequate exercise, environmental contaminants, ionizing radiation, tobacco, viruses, nor heredity. "
http://vegsource.com/harris/cancer_vegdiet.htm
could be considered a minority opinion. (I wonder if the good doctor smokes? ) and even his conclusions stated "There is a modest negative correlation with these cancers and plant source food consumption."
So, back to my original question, perhaps phrased more precisely. Have there been any peer reviewed papers that prove causality between plant based diets and lower risk of cancer, heart disease etc?
Since you obviously took stats 101 at some point in your life, perhaps you know that research is set up to prove the null hypothesis (in essence, there is NO DIFFERENCE between control and test groups). Science is the best chance we have to understand complex truths, but you are naive to think any research can 'prove causality.'0 -
......
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters.]Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.
Can you cite at least one peer reviewed study supporting this assertion?
Here is a position paper that cites dozens of studies:
http://www.vrg.org/nutrition/adapaper.htm
Here are others:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/jul/01/vegetarians-blood-cancer-diet-risk
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/5698784/Being-a-vegetarian-can-cut-your-risk-of-cancer-by-a-half-claim-scientists.html
http://vegsource.com/harris/cancer_vegdiet.htm
The major studies, the German study the China study, the Framingham study are not cited here. You can google those.
Had a look at several of the citations and saw the word correlation used frequently and we all know that correlation does not prove causation.
Interestingly :
"However, Allen urged caution over the interpretation of the findings. "It is a significant difference, but we should be a bit cautious since it is the first study showing that the risk of cancer of the blood is lower in vegetarians. We need to know what aspect of a fish and vegetarian diet is protecting against cancer. Is it the higher fibre intake, higher intake of fruit and vegetables, is it just meat per se?"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/jul/01/vegetarians-blood-cancer-diet-risk
I'd also be curious to see more information on the socio-economic status of the participants in the British as that has been determined to be a leading indicator or risk of premature death from all causes. We may be witnessing skewed results as the result of selection bias (ie are vegans more likely to avoid other behaviours that have been linked to cancer and heart disease risk?).
I also suspect that this:
"Cancer is not caused by bacteria, faulty diet, inadequate exercise, environmental contaminants, ionizing radiation, tobacco, viruses, nor heredity. "
http://vegsource.com/harris/cancer_vegdiet.htm
could be considered a minority opinion. (I wonder if the good doctor smokes? ) and even his conclusions stated "There is a modest negative correlation with these cancers and plant source food consumption."
So, back to my original question, perhaps phrased more precisely. Have there been any peer reviewed papers that prove causality between plant based diets and lower risk of cancer, heart disease etc?
Since you obviously took stats 101 at some point in your life, perhaps you know that research is set up to prove the null hypothesis (in essence, there is NO DIFFERENCE between control and test groups). Science is the best chance we have to understand complex truths, but you are naive to think any research can 'prove causality.'
Which means you then agree that his statement "practically every study proves..." to be inaccurate. That's what I'm questioning, he used the word "proves".
I would disagree with the naive bit because I already knew that it's an impossible burden - there are far too many variables involved which leads back to nullifying the assertion that a vegan diet is in any way superior to an omnivorous one. Humans evolved as omnivores, we also developed the intellectual capacity to make choices based on personal values . I have no problem with anyone who chooses not to eat meat, I do have a problem with the faulty assertions that a vegan diet is superior to an omnivorous one.0 -
......
Bytheway, in case you're interested, nobody has claimed that a vegan diet will allow you to live forever. Why don't you come back when you are 69 and we'll talk about how many mountains you have climbed in the last year or so.
Statistics is the science of large numbers, not of predicting any single individual's longevity. Statistically we vegetarians live longer, have a lower incidence of cancer and heart disease, and are healthier and more active than similarly aged meat eaters.]Practically every study proves that. Some would-be genius might pick out the name of some vegetarian who died young, but that proves nothing, except that he has knows nothing about statistics.
Can you cite at least one peer reviewed study supporting this assertion?
Here is a position paper that cites dozens of studies:
http://www.vrg.org/nutrition/adapaper.htm
Here are others:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/jul/01/vegetarians-blood-cancer-diet-risk
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/5698784/Being-a-vegetarian-can-cut-your-risk-of-cancer-by-a-half-claim-scientists.html
http://vegsource.com/harris/cancer_vegdiet.htm
The major studies, the German study the China study, the Framingham study are not cited here. You can google those.
Had a look at several of the citations and saw the word correlation used frequently and we all know that correlation does not prove causation.
Interestingly :
"However, Allen urged caution over the interpretation of the findings. "It is a significant difference, but we should be a bit cautious since it is the first study showing that the risk of cancer of the blood is lower in vegetarians. We need to know what aspect of a fish and vegetarian diet is protecting against cancer. Is it the higher fibre intake, higher intake of fruit and vegetables, is it just meat per se?"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/jul/01/vegetarians-blood-cancer-diet-risk
I'd also be curious to see more information on the socio-economic status of the participants in the British as that has been determined to be a leading indicator or risk of premature death from all causes. We may be witnessing skewed results as the result of selection bias (ie are vegans more likely to avoid other behaviours that have been linked to cancer and heart disease risk?).
I also suspect that this:
"Cancer is not caused by bacteria, faulty diet, inadequate exercise, environmental contaminants, ionizing radiation, tobacco, viruses, nor heredity. "
http://vegsource.com/harris/cancer_vegdiet.htm
could be considered a minority opinion. (I wonder if the good doctor smokes? ) and even his conclusions stated "There is a modest negative correlation with these cancers and plant source food consumption."
So, back to my original question, perhaps phrased more precisely. Have there been any peer reviewed papers that prove causality between plant based diets and lower risk of cancer, heart disease etc?
Since you obviously took stats 101 at some point in your life, perhaps you know that research is set up to prove the null hypothesis (in essence, there is NO DIFFERENCE between control and test groups). Science is the best chance we have to understand complex truths, but you are naive to think any research can 'prove causality.'
Which means you then agree that his statement "practically every study proves..." to be inaccurate. That's what I'm questioning, he used the word "proves".
I would disagree with the naive bit because I already knew that it's an impossible burden - there are far too many variables involved which leads back to nullifying the assertion that a vegan diet is in any way superior to an omnivorous one. Humans evolved as omnivores, we also developed the intellectual capacity to make choices based on personal values . I have no problem with anyone who chooses not to eat meat, I do have a problem with the faulty assertions that a vegan diet is superior to an omnivorous one.
I think the vegan diet is the kindest one around with respect to the treatment of animals. That's enough for me. But, even though research--by its very design--will never *prove* anything, I pay attention to epidemiological/ecological research because sometimes correlation and causation are one and the same, even if it can't be scientifically stated in this way.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions