Are "Trolls" Really Bad? ..... (An Open Discussion)
Anyone that posts on any forums, anywhere, has likely heard the term "forum troll." Anyone that posts on any forms with any regularity has likely been called a "troll" by someone who didn't like what they had to say.
Disambiguation of the word "Troll"
First, let's educate everyone on the term "troll." The word "forum troll" does not reference big, green monsters from mythology, despite all the inane pictures people like to post in forum strings.
The term was originally coined to describe an individual that posts proactive topics in a form to evoke responses from other forum members.
The term references a verb, not "green monsters." Specifically, the act of "trolling." Trolling is an angling (fishing) term. It is the act of slowly dragging bait behind a boat to attract fish.
"Trolling" in a forum works the same way. The individual attempting to evoke a response from forum members by posting a topic or statement that will evoke an emotional response from others.
Accusations of being a "Troll"
Calling someone a "troll" has become the go to, automated response for many forum participants when they either don't like what another poster said, and/or don't have an effective response.
There are two different ways of viewing this particular issue.
Theory A: Everyone is a "troll." -- Everyone is posting information in a forum to evoke a response. Otherwise, why would you post in the first place?
Theory B: Trolls are those that deliberately and exclusively post "off-topic" subjects that are SPECIFICALLY designed to hurt other people emotionally.
Examples:
- "I hope all grandmas die from rabies" = Troll... because grandmas are not a standard topic, and their demise is sad.
- "All Michigan girls smell like ham" = Troll... because MI girls are not a standard topic, and most do not smell like ham.
I personally subscribe to Theory B.
Someone posting an opinion you don't like, does not establish them as a "troll."
Someone hiding behind the safety of a computer and anonymous screen name trying to hurt other people in an effort to fill the massive void in their self-esteem... is a "troll."
All that said, are "trolls" by either definition, inherently bad?
Trolls get people talking.
Trolls rally opinions and form bonds between other posters.
Trolls put other topics into clear perspective.
Thoughts?
Disambiguation of the word "Troll"
First, let's educate everyone on the term "troll." The word "forum troll" does not reference big, green monsters from mythology, despite all the inane pictures people like to post in forum strings.
The term was originally coined to describe an individual that posts proactive topics in a form to evoke responses from other forum members.
The term references a verb, not "green monsters." Specifically, the act of "trolling." Trolling is an angling (fishing) term. It is the act of slowly dragging bait behind a boat to attract fish.
"Trolling" in a forum works the same way. The individual attempting to evoke a response from forum members by posting a topic or statement that will evoke an emotional response from others.
Accusations of being a "Troll"
Calling someone a "troll" has become the go to, automated response for many forum participants when they either don't like what another poster said, and/or don't have an effective response.
There are two different ways of viewing this particular issue.
Theory A: Everyone is a "troll." -- Everyone is posting information in a forum to evoke a response. Otherwise, why would you post in the first place?
Theory B: Trolls are those that deliberately and exclusively post "off-topic" subjects that are SPECIFICALLY designed to hurt other people emotionally.
Examples:
- "I hope all grandmas die from rabies" = Troll... because grandmas are not a standard topic, and their demise is sad.
- "All Michigan girls smell like ham" = Troll... because MI girls are not a standard topic, and most do not smell like ham.
I personally subscribe to Theory B.
Someone posting an opinion you don't like, does not establish them as a "troll."
Someone hiding behind the safety of a computer and anonymous screen name trying to hurt other people in an effort to fill the massive void in their self-esteem... is a "troll."
All that said, are "trolls" by either definition, inherently bad?
Trolls get people talking.
Trolls rally opinions and form bonds between other posters.
Trolls put other topics into clear perspective.
Thoughts?
0
Replies
-
While some are pretty horrible, there are some that openly say what we are all thinking anyway, and people don't want to hear/see that.0
-
I always thought trolls were the guys that show up to bars during last call in the hopes of "picking up" some random drunk chick and taking her home without having to shell out for beer or liquor?0
-
While some are pretty horrible, there are some that openly say what we are all thinking anyway, and people don't want to hear/see that.
The Simon Cowell from American Idol Effect. Everyone "hated" him, yet most people completely agreed with his statements.0 -
Funny post!! LOVE IT ;-)0
-
I hate trolls. They are....just stupid, IMO. When I post, I don't expect to get a response from someone, usually when I do, it's from someone who thinks they can make me look stupid by putting down my response.
Trolls are really bad. Usually, some come to the point of stalking a specific person, and trolling them. One girl, Amber ( who remembers her? ) made almost 10 accounts with Sophie because she hated her that much. And then she'd make off-topic topics hating Sophie..
A troll.
Or a girl, most should know if you were friends with her, aloneinsidek ( deactivated ).
She was probably trolling us. I say probably, because she might've been serious.
She had a fake ED, calling it EBNOS. She didn't know the real thing - EDNOS.
And she was a train wreck. I honestly don't know if she was trying to make us mad on purpose and if you had seen her wall, we were b*tches to her. But, who knows. Maybe she was just that messed up in the head.
Trolls have no lifes IMO. The real trolls who post to make people mad on purpose. Or they are in a quite PMS-ing mood.0 -
Funny post!! LOVE IT ;-)
I try.0 -
I hate trolls. They are....just stupid, IMO. When I post, I don't expect to get a response from someone, usually when I do, it's from someone who thinks they can make me look stupid by putting down my response.
Trolls are really bad. Usually, some come to the point of stalking a specific person, and trolling them. One girl, Amber ( who remembers her? ) made almost 10 accounts with Sophie because she hated her that much. And then she'd make off-topic topics hating Sophie..
A troll.
Or a girl, most should know if you were friends with her, aloneinsidek ( deactivated ).
She was probably trolling us. I say probably, because she might've been serious.
She had a fake ED, calling it EBNOS. She didn't know the real thing - EDNOS.
And she was a train wreck. I honestly don't know if she was trying to make us mad on purpose and if you had seen her wall, we were b*tches to her. But, who knows. Maybe she was just that messed up in the head.
Trolls have no lifes IMO. The real trolls who post to make people mad on purpose. Or they are in a quite PMS-ing mood.
Yes... but... by that standard, everyone should simply sit around saying nice things, about nice people, all the nice-nice time.
I find that scenario... absolutely terrifying.0 -
I don't mind trolls. I mind the people who get so worked up over the troll posts. Not everyone on the internet is going to agree with you and it is pointless to spend 20 posts fighting with anyone (let alone someone who possibly only posts to pi$$ off people).0
-
I don't like how the definition of "troll" has shifted over the years into the current understanding, which is generally someone who starts **** just to get a response.
Wikipedia desribes it pretty well:
"The most likely derivation of the word troll can be found in the phrase "trolling for newbies", popularized in the early 1990s in the Usenet group, alt.folklore.urban (AFU).[12][13] Commonly, what is meant is a relatively gentle inside joke by veteran users, presenting questions or topics that had been so overdone that only a new user would respond to them earnestly. For example, a veteran of the group might make a post on the common misconception that glass flows over time. Long-time readers would both recognize the poster's name and know that the topic had been discussed a lot, but new subscribers to the group would not realize, and would thus respond. These types of trolls served as a practice to identify group insiders. This definition of trolling, considerably narrower than the modern understanding of the term, was considered a positive contribution."
"Trolling" in its true sense requires cleverness and wit. It shouldn't be obvious to everyone when someone is trolling.0 -
Trolls provide laughs. I don't have a problem with them.0
-
I don't mind trolls. I mind the people who get so worked up over the troll posts. Not everyone on the internet is going to agree with you and it is pointless to spend 20 posts fighting with anyone (let alone someone who possibly only posts to pi$$ off people).
I love trolls. They amuse the hell out of me.0 -
In my fathers words "they can't argue with themselves"
... in some instances some people will give it a really good try though
0 -
I don't like how the definition of "troll" has shifted over the years into the current understanding, which is generally someone who starts **** just to get a response.
Wikipedia desribes it pretty well:
"The most likely derivation of the word troll can be found in the phrase "trolling for newbies", popularized in the early 1990s in the Usenet group, alt.folklore.urban (AFU).[12][13] Commonly, what is meant is a relatively gentle inside joke by veteran users, presenting questions or topics that had been so overdone that only a new user would respond to them earnestly. For example, a veteran of the group might make a post on the common misconception that glass flows over time. Long-time readers would both recognize the poster's name and know that the topic had been discussed a lot, but new subscribers to the group would not realize, and would thus respond. These types of trolls served as a practice to identify group insiders. This definition of trolling, considerably narrower than the modern understanding of the term, was considered a positive contribution."
"Trolling" in its true sense requires cleverness and wit. It shouldn't be obvious to everyone when someone is trolling.
Amen.0 -
So by in facts you stated you are trolling....great post thanks for the education.....0
-
I hate trolls. They are....just stupid, IMO. When I post, I don't expect to get a response from someone, usually when I do, it's from someone who thinks they can make me look stupid by putting down my response.
Trolls are really bad. Usually, some come to the point of stalking a specific person, and trolling them. One girl, Amber ( who remembers her? ) made almost 10 accounts with Sophie because she hated her that much. And then she'd make off-topic topics hating Sophie..
A troll.
Or a girl, most should know if you were friends with her, aloneinsidek ( deactivated ).
She was probably trolling us. I say probably, because she might've been serious.
She had a fake ED, calling it EBNOS. She didn't know the real thing - EDNOS.
And she was a train wreck. I honestly don't know if she was trying to make us mad on purpose and if you had seen her wall, we were b*tches to her. But, who knows. Maybe she was just that messed up in the head.
Trolls have no lifes IMO. The real trolls who post to make people mad on purpose. Or they are in a quite PMS-ing mood.
Yes... but... by that standard, everyone should simply sit around saying nice things, about nice people, all the nice-nice time.
I find that scenario... absolutely terrifying.
I don't think nice is in my vocabulary....LOL that was quite scary.0 -
So by in facts you stated you are trolling....great post thanks for the education.....
I do enjoy gettin' my toll on, at times.0 -
Anyone that posts on any forums, anywhere, has likely heard the term "forum troll." Anyone that posts on any forms with any regularity has likely been called a "troll" by someone who didn't like what they had to say.
Disambiguation of the word "Troll"
First, let's educate everyone on the term "troll." The word "forum troll" does not reference big, green monsters from mythology, despite all the inane pictures people like to post in forum strings.
The term was originally coined to describe an individual that posts proactive topics in a form to evoke responses from other forum members.
The term references a verb, not "green monsters." Specifically, the act of "trolling." Trolling is an angling (fishing) term. It is the act of slowly dragging bait behind a boat to attract fish.
"Trolling" in a forum works the same way. The individual attempting to evoke a response from forum members by posting a topic or statement that will evoke an emotional response from others.
Accusations of being a "Troll"
Calling someone a "troll" has become the go to, automated response for many forum participants when they either don't like what another poster said, and/or don't have an effective response.
There are two different ways of viewing this particular issue.
Theory A: Everyone is a "troll." -- Everyone is posting information in a forum to evoke a response. Otherwise, why would you post in the first place?
Theory B: Trolls are those that deliberately and exclusively post "off-topic" subjects that are SPECIFICALLY designed to hurt other people emotionally.
Examples:
- "I hope all grandmas die from rabies" = Troll... because grandmas are not a standard topic, and their demise is sad.
- "All Michigan girls smell like ham" = Troll... because MI girls are not a standard topic, and most do not smell like ham.
I personally subscribe to Theory B.
Someone posting an opinion you don't like, does not establish them as a "troll."
Someone hiding behind the safety of a computer and anonymous screen name trying to hurt other people in an effort to fill the massive void in their self-esteem... is a "troll."
All that said, are "trolls" by either definition, inherently bad?
Trolls get people talking.
Trolls rally opinions and form bonds between other posters.
Trolls put other topics into clear perspective.
Thoughts?
Ever listen to Styx? " I've got too much time on my hands"................0 -
Trolls make the best Bacon....0
-
Well in reference to what I said before, trolls SOMETIMES say things we are already thinking, they just openly say it. Yeah to piss people off etc..but....there was an evil thread going around earlier that while I wouldn't put it in those words, the OP had a point.0
-
Anything to justify your behavior on this forum as of late, eh?
How about explaining the definition of an asshat?0 -
no we here from the lower part of Michigan are not bad at all. Yes we know what you youpers call us and hey that's fine as we do live under the bridge. Come on down and see the sights, enjoy our great outdoors and you will see we really are pretty great:)-0
-
Well in reference to what I said before, trolls SOMETIMES say things we are already thinking, they just openly say it. Yeah to piss people off etc..but....there was an evil thread going around earlier that while I wouldn't put it in those words, the OP had a point.
Yeah, the "Fat Girls" thread. That thread was the catalyst for this one.0 -
trolls are skinnyfat and they don't eat back their exercise calories0
-
But what if most MI girls DO smell like ham? I think that's a very subjective description of MI girls.0
-
Anything to justify your behavior on this forum as of late, eh?
How about explaining the definition of an asshat?
A colloquial cliche' overtly utilized by individuals with devastatingly low self-esteem that constantly, and continuously vie for attention by "calling-out" those they consider superior and a subsequent threat, from the safety of a computer, a fake picture and an anonymous screen name.
Yeah. Ouch.
Next.0 -
i ♥ friendly trolls0
-
Anything to justify your behavior on this forum as of late, eh?
How about explaining the definition of an asshat?
A colloquial cliche' overtly utilized by individuals with devastatingly low self-esteem that constantly, and continuously vie for attention by "calling-out" those they consider superior and a subsequent threat, from the safety of a computer, a fake picture and an anonymous screen name.
Yeah. Ouch.
Next.
Oh, I love how you think you've turned my argument back around on me. However, I pointed out your low self-esteem several days ago when you decided to make some random statement belittling men who take pictures of themselves in the bathroom mirror with their shirts off on what would have otherwise been an excellent post!
Now, I shall be "calling you out" as a hypocrite. And while some "brutal honesty" doesn't make you a troll, your attempt to evoke a response whether it be positive or negative IS what makes you a troll.0 -
trolls are skinnyfat and they don't eat back their exercise calories
hey... then i must be one!0 -
Anything to justify your behavior on this forum as of late, eh?
How about explaining the definition of an asshat?
A colloquial cliche' overtly utilized by individuals with devastatingly low self-esteem that constantly, and continuously vie for attention by "calling-out" those they consider superior and a subsequent threat, from the safety of a computer, a fake picture and an anonymous screen name.
Yeah. Ouch.
Next.
funny :smokin:0 -
your attempt to evoke a response whether it be positive or negative IS what makes you a troll.
So is that a good thing or a bad thing?0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.8K Introduce Yourself
- 44K Getting Started
- 260.6K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.2K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.7K Fitness and Exercise
- 444 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.2K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 4.1K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 1.3K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.8K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions