Viewing the message boards in:

No Homo?

11213141517

Replies

  • Posts: 402 Member

    Then let me clarify, if I don't say anything to be offensive on purpose and I don't want to hurt your feelings then I don't care at all that you are hurt by it. The bottom line is grow up put your big boy or girl panties on and quit dwelling on words that are not directed at you...life is full of wrongs, bullsh#t, and hardship, either deal with it or get emotionally crushed under it.

    When you use a term that is intended to hurt, demean or dehumanize a whole group of people, it is directed at THE ENTIRE GROUP. For example, the reason "that's so gay" is considered offensive is because it makes "gay" a synonym for "stupid", and thus implies that everyone who is gay is stupid. That is offensive to a whole group of people. Same thing with any derrogatory group; it's demeaning and offensive everyone who makes up that group, REGARDLESS of the individual you were TRYING TO OFFEND when you called them that name.

    Life IS full of wrongs, bull, and hardship - why contribute to that?
  • Posts: 4,676 Member
    So today to see how sensative people are when you post something on someones thread if they are overweight type "No-Fatties" and for those that are at their goal type "No Anorexia" and lets see how people explode on that.

    Any time you classify people it can appear to be offensive and devisive. I am straight but will shop until my last day on earth, I will be asked contually if I am gay or not because I wear loud colors and Jerry Garcia ties with my bright french cuff shirts. I am not gay but take it as a compliment when a man hits on me just as I enjoy women complimenting me in my clothes. Just because I would not sleep with or date SeaRunner does not mean I cannot hang out, shop or party with him as I do anyone else.

    No Prejudice!
  • Posts: 402 Member

    I had no idea I wasn't a man anymore because I don't chase females Last time I checked, I had all the right parts to qualify as male. So just for future reference, when I'm filling out a form that asks for gender and the choices are male or female, which do I pick? Your sage advice is desperately needed.

    :laugh: Fantastic post, SeaRunner! I'm going to point this out the next time someone says what this person said.
  • Posts: 484

    It's enough for me to know what I know, once I've determined something for myself. When I question my thinking and not give words power over me then I'm happy and at peace. I find it much more enjoyable to live life in a way where I don't automatically assume what someone means. And even if they mean it in a derogatory way, to not let their opinion matter to me MORE than my own peace of mind.

    Don't let me disturb your inner peace. But language does not rise out of the individual and grace the universe with its singularity. Language is a social contract, unbreakable insofar as humans are social beings. The sound of words forms arbitrarily, but then the meaning rises from social interaction, and the value is eventually determined by common usage.
  • Posts: 1,914 Member

    Don't let me disturb your inner peace. But language does not rise out of the individual and grace the universe with its singularity. Language is a social contract, unbreakable insofar as humans are social beings. The sound of words forms arbitrarily, but then the meaning rises from social interaction, and the value determined by common usage.

    Exactly...value determined by common usage. So if the collective majority is in the habit of giving words and definitions too much power, to the point where they war with one another, then perhaps such "value" should be questioned. Throughout history, what was once common knowledge or common behavior, has changed and evolved. I don't place much stock in "common" value, but prefer to think for myself.
  • Posts: 518 Member
    Don't let me disturb your inner peace. But language does not rise out of the individual and grace the universe with its singularity. Language is a social contract, unbreakable insofar as humans are social beings. The sound of words forms arbitrarily, but then the meaning rises from social interaction, and the value is eventually determined by common usage.
    Pardon me, and I'm sorry to interrupt, but I would just like to say that the way you language is really hot.
  • Posts: 4,676 Member
    OMG, are we all gonna roll together? :noway:

    Everyone get your no homo in now......:grumble:
  • Posts: 484

    Exactly...value determined by common usage. So if the collective majority is in the habit of giving words and definitions too much power, to the point where they war with one another, then perhaps such "value" should be questioned. Throughout history, what was once common knowledge or common behavior, has changed and evolved. I don't place much stock in "common" value, but prefer to think for myself.

    Again, I'm not attempting to discount the importance of "thinking for yourself" but it's important to realize that the "habit of giving words and definitions too much power" isn't optional . . . insofar as humans are social beings. In fact, the "habit" is more or less the definition of language, and you use that same language to "think for yourself." There is no way to give definitions too much power: given or not, these definitions define how humans exist as social beings.
  • Haha, not that funny i guess but Right on man. And yes that seems offensive. No insecuro.
  • Posts: 1,914 Member

    Again, I'm not attempting to discount the importance of "thinking for yourself" but it's important to realize that the "habit of giving words and definitions too much power" isn't optional . . . insofar as humans are social beings. In fact, the "habit" is more or less the definition of language, and you use that same language to "think for yourself." There is no way to give definitions too much power: given or not, these definitions define how humans exists as social beings.

    But you see, I have discovered in my own life experience that the habit of giving words and definitions too much power IS optional. Here is where freedom lies. All habits can be broken, no matter how ingrained they may seem. Who we are is more powerful than the thinking mind. At least this is what I've come to realize.

    I've enjoyed our chat. Must run to the gym now.

    Cheers. :)
  • Posts: 222 Member
    my wife loves to say queer but has been told she can't use that word anymore cause it will offend people...since when are we told we can't use words even when they have a different meaning(strange, odd) I just don't get this country!!
  • Posts: 13,274 Member

    I find slang to be neither dishonest nor immature. To each their own.

    Cheers.

    In general, no, but in the case of the term "breeder," yes, it's quite dishonest. in the case of the phrase "That's so gay," yes, very immature. There just comes a point in life when the young people are making up new slang faster than an older gal can handle. So I gave up. :smokin:
  • Posts: 13,274 Member
    :flowerforyou:
    Pardon me, and I'm sorry to interrupt, but I would just like to say that the way you language is really hot.

    ^^ Agreed!
  • Posts: 67 Member
    Okay...if my man wanted to be called gay or a girl...I'd dump him so fast...I don't know what glee is and....gay me are NOT manly...part of being a man in ALL lifeforms involves chasing the FEMALES..I'm only being honest...
    Excuse me?

    This has to count as one of the most ridiculous posts that I've read here at MFP. Being a man is having male sex organs. It has nothing to do with gender roles or sexual attraction. According to the simple definition in your post, a rapist would be considered pretty darn manly.

    You are perpetuating a stereotype about gay men that is simply not true. Many gay men can fit into the societal definition of manly - sporty, strong, muscular, debonair, hairy...whatever society may consider manly. I don't think that the fact that they don't want to have sex with women makes them any less of a man. For those gay men who don't fit into the manly category...they are still as much of a man as anyone else.
  • Posts: 67 Member
    God hates homo so "no homo" is actually a good thing.
    Milk? I know that homo milk has a high milk fat percentage so maybe God does hate it. God hates Homo Milk!
  • Posts: 2,544 Member
    :flowerforyou:
    ^^ Agreed!

    I miss Wittgenstein . . .
  • Posts: 1,299 Member
    For me, personally, if I'm not inspiring straight men to lust, then I'm not working hard enough.

    You body is looking totally great. Amazing transformation --Yes Hetero

    There we go, problem solved.
  • Posts: 3,653 Member

    You body is looking totally great. Amazing transformation --Yes Hetero

    There we go, problem solved.

    Thank you, that makes me feel good about myself.
  • Posts: 3,653 Member
    ROLL!
  • Posts: 3,863 Member
    Rollin', rollin', rollin' RAWHIDE.
  • Posts: 3,863 Member
    I win.
  • Posts: 2,186 Member
    WheneverITryToPlayItSmooth-63745.gif
  • Posts: 8,646 Member
    I was just about to say, wow this thread rolled but of course it's my loser friends that rolled it themselves. :laugh:
  • Posts: 2,926 Member
    Is there something wrong with me that I assumed this thread was about milk before I opened it? :laugh:
  • Posts: 2,186 Member
    I was just about to say, wow this thread rolled but of course it's my loser friends that rolled it themselves. :laugh:

    h98h.gif
  • Posts: 8,646 Member

    h98h.gif

    r1bDatq.gif
  • Posts: 3,306 Member
    so now this thread is just an estrogen fest?
  • Posts: 24,208 Member
    so now this thread is just an estrogen fest?

    Until you put your tip in.
  • Posts: 1,590 Member

    r1bDatq.gif
    Ahhh, but can he roll his tongue at the same time like me?
  • Posts: 844 Member
    Yahoo!


    y3Yxr.gif[img][/img]
This discussion has been closed.