We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Clean Eating Bashing?

1246725

Replies

  • Posts: 2,019 Member

    LOL. So you want specific scientific studies that prove to you that it makes ME feel good? LMFAO. I think you are reading more into it than is actually there. If I want to make a homemade Grassfed burger Wth do you care.


    I do believe you need to read the OP again. I eat this way. I like it. Eat what you want. Who gas?
    If the sentence I bolded is what you got out of my responses, then we have a serious communication issue, perhaps even a language barrier.
  • Posts: 436 Member

    LOL. So you want specific scientific studies that prove to you that it makes ME feel good? LMFAO. I think you are reading more into it than is actually there. If I want to make a homemade Grassfed burger Wth do you care.


    I do believe you need to read the OP again. I eat this way. I like it. Eat what you want. Who gas?

    As far as a clear cut definition of clean eating.....I don't think there is one. If there is it will probably change tomorrow. For me....it is what I said.
  • Posts: 15,267 Member

    Why nearly impossible today?

    I eat Organic meat, fruits, vegetables and include as many other organic foods as possible. It's pretty easy if you know where to find it... science nonsense? well I don't have to be a scientist to know that hormones, pesticides and whatever chemically induced engineered digit code number pumped into food is bad for you.

    This is not to say that I did not have a magnum ego on the weekend and enjoy every finger licken part of it.

    But i try to eat clean as much as possible, but not all the time - Cus life is for living.

    SO YOU CAN EAT YOUR FRIKEN FILTHY *kitten* JELLY BEAN!! HAHA :D

    Why because unless they are using seeds from a century ago to grow these veggies the seeds are GMO....

    "Evidence on substantial differences between organic food and conventional food is insufficient to make claims that organic food is safer or healthier than conventional food With respect to taste, the evidence is also insufficient to make scientific claims that organic food tastes better."

    There is a group here that is certified organic and I know for a fact that they have chemists working on bug killers, fertilizers etc all the time...they call it compost tea...even organic you have no idea what is really going in it.
  • Posts: 199 Member
    Who dropped the "pal" from the "myfitnesspal"? :smile:
  • Posts: 12,545 Member
    I think people bash it because they can't hack it. It's too 'hard'.
  • Posts: 55 Member

    Why because unless they are using seeds from a century ago to grow these veggies the seeds are GMO....

    "Evidence on substantial differences between organic food and conventional food is insufficient to make claims that organic food is safer or healthier than conventional food With respect to taste, the evidence is also insufficient to make scientific claims that organic food tastes better."

    There is a group here that is certified organic and I know for a fact that they have chemists working on bug killers, fertilizers etc all the time...they call it compost tea...even organic you have no idea what is really going in it.

    Seeds - So your saying that because the seeds and soil are already tainted, we may as well spray pesticide because we are screwed anyway. It's like your saying have a s*** sandwhich and another scoop of s*** on top beacuse your eating it anyway.

    "Evidence on substantial differences between organic food and conventional food is insufficient to make claims that organic food is safer or healthier than conventional food With respect to taste, the evidence is also insufficient to make scientific claims that organic food tastes better."

    ^ This is in reference to taste - we all know fatty processed foods taste good, my *kitten* knows this better than anyone.
    But there is substantial evidence which "States" organically farmed food is better for you than processed.

    And your right, we have no idea what is really in our food and there sure are companies out there who will just slap an organic sticker on their product even when its not. But this isn't going to stop me from doing my best to try and eat cleaner.
  • Posts: 199 Member
    If you've seen the Bull****! episode by Penn Gillette on organics, it seems that anecdotally the GMO-food is better tasting than organic food.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5amLAMRQk5I
  • Posts: 436 Member
    Eating "cleaner" makes me feel better. It's not for everyone.

    Do I think it's necessary for weight loss. No.


    How do you NOT get that this is opinion?
  • Posts: 55 Member
    If you've seen the Bull****! episode by Penn Gillette on organics, it seems that anecdotally the GMO-food is better tasting than organic food.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5amLAMRQk5I

    Of course it is, it's not natural!!

    We all know that things that are bad for you taste good, otherwise half of us wouldn't be here ha-ha
  • Posts: 15,267 Member

    Seeds - So your saying that because the seeds and soil are already tainted, we may as well spray pesticide because we are screwed anyway. It's like your saying have a s*** sandwhich and another scoop of s*** on top beacuse your eating it anyway.

    "Evidence on substantial differences between organic food and conventional food is insufficient to make claims that organic food is safer or healthier than conventional food With respect to taste, the evidence is also insufficient to make scientific claims that organic food tastes better."

    ^ This is in reference to taste - we all know fatty processed foods taste good, my *kitten* knows this better than anyone.
    But there is substantial evidence which "States" organically farmed food is better for you than processed.

    And your right, we have no idea what is really in our food and there sure are companies out there who will just slap an organic sticker on their product even when its not. But this isn't going to stop me from doing my best to try and eat cleaner.
    [/quote]

    No what I am saying is that even organic food has lots of processed items in it so that argument is null for it being "clean" per the loose definition given. If you do the research on the organic industry (and I could as my husband worked there) you find out that they tweak stuff all the time and refuse to give out the recipe. Yes their cows were grass fed but they still altered the milk and cheese etc. And the cows did require vet visits to prevent illness etc.

    As for the other reference reread please it actually says that there is no evidence that organic is "healthier|
    " or "safer" or " tastes better"
  • Posts: 1,206 Member
    I'm not really a fan of Twinkies. I've found that washing them doesn't help.
  • Posts: 15,267 Member
    Basically what it comes down to is this...

    Why deprive yourself of something you really want? it's not going to hurt you in moderation. Stay at a reasonable calorie deficit is what is required to lose weight, exercise for fitness...

    All the other stuff, clean eating, detoxes, cleanses, juice fasts etc are not necessary for weight loss....or fitness

    If you choose that great go ahead but there are lots here who know that in the end of it all those who deprive themselves of the items they want ie "bad" food like pizza, or cookies or cake or nuggets will eventually fail..it is the psychology of weight loss.

    ETA and those that choose "clean" have at but those who know you don't have to will always let that fact be known and if it looks like bashing you too sensitive.
  • Posts: 9,151 Member
    I see some people on here that survive exclusively on fast food and I really don't want to pay for your Obamacare for you.
    tumblr_mtv3gsTJ531sj3oxho1_500.gif
    You make me glad I'm an ex-pat and now live in Canada.

    Also, that attitude is why people who eat like me get "bashy" about people who eat like you. The way you eat works for you. The way I eat works for me. We can always compare test results.
    tumblr_mtpm52pn7e1sj3oxho1_400.gif

    Edit: spelling derp
  • Posts: 8,059 Member

    It was not implied. You inferred it.

    3 Reasons: Meeting your nutritional needs before you eat exclusively snacks is on its face better for you or nutritional guidelines would not exist at all. Twinkies take a great deal of processing and transporting of ingredients to accomplish, which contributes to water and air pollution, neither or which are good for you. Twinkies contain a lot of corn-based ingredients which contribute to the mono-cropping of American and threaten the sustainability of the food system.

    Do your own freaking research on Twinkies. You are lazy for making me do it for you.

    I see some people on here that survive exclusively on fast food and I really don't want to pay for your Obamacare for you.
    Wait, so eating clean just means hitting your nutritional needs? So you mean IF IT FITS YOUR MACROS, it's ok?
  • Posts: 70 Member
    Personally, clean eating for me is eating as much unprocessed food as possible. Avoiding sugary foods because it negatively affects my performance when running. Eating a balanced meal that includes complex carbohydrates, fat and protein. And ensuring that I get all of my vitamins and minerals from food before the end of the day. This has worked great for me and I call this clean eating for me. By definition, If I start consuming sweets and junk food I am eating dirty because it goes against my definition. Now what people fail to understand is that what works for them may not work for someone else. Who am I to tell them how to eat. Everyone's body is different and will respond differently to certain diets. From the top of my head I can think of a few definitions of clean eating. 1. Eating within their calorie limit. 2. Eating lots of plants, fresh meats, whole grains, reading ingredient lists, eating fewer ingredients, eating smaller frequent meals, etc. 3. Eating three meals a day. 4. Avoiding foods you know you are allergic and sensitive to. The list can go on. I understand why people bash the term because it is an ambiguous term.
  • Posts: 12,589 Member
    Man! Work kept me away from this gem. In, late :grumble:
  • Posts: 1,710 Member
    I'm not really a fan of Twinkies. I've found that washing them doesn't help.

    *snort*
  • Posts: 833 Member
    I eat a "clean" diet whether I'm trying to lose weight or not.

    If I'm trying to run a calorie deficit, so-called "clean" foods make it easier because they're so much more filling, ounce for ounce, than processed foods.

    If I'm eating a slight calorie surplus to get stronger, it's about the only way I can get enough protein into my diet at my calorie goal.

    But that's just me. If ice cream and cake fit into your diet plan and don't get in your way, more power to you.
  • Posts: 27,732 Member
    this place definitely ain't named "MyScienceBasedFactsPal" either

    QFT
  • Posts: 62 Member
    hr
    YOU HAVE TO EAT ALL ORGANIC FOOD AND FREE RANGE MEAT OR YOU WILL DIE!!!!!!
    We are going to die in the long run anyway...organic food or not lol
  • Posts: 28,072 Member
    Have not read the thread as I am sure it will play out the way that the thousands of other 'clean eating' posts do.

    The issue that I have with it is:

    1) the pompousness of 'clean eaters' that you often see (just as annoying as the other extreme)
    2) the basic misinformation that is given, like "you can only have abs if you eat clean"
    3) the fact that many 'clean' eaters' are incredibly disparaging of those that do not eat clean, calling their food 'garbage' and the like
    4) the fact that many of these 'clean eaters' do not actually eat clean for much of the time when you actually look at their diaries

    I get that people posting gifs of pop-tarts, ice cream and cheesecake can be annoying, but so is the above.


    So, until the above stops, I doubt that the other will.
  • Posts: 27,732 Member

    It was not implied. You inferred it.

    3 Reasons: Meeting your nutritional needs before you eat exclusively snacks is on its face better for you or nutritional guidelines would not exist at all. Twinkies take a great deal of processing and transporting of ingredients to accomplish, which contributes to water and air pollution, neither or which are good for you. Twinkies contain a lot of corn-based ingredients which contribute to the mono-cropping of American and threaten the sustainability of the food system.

    Do your own freaking research on Twinkies. You are lazy for making me do it for you.

    I see some people on here that survive exclusively on fast food and I really don't want to pay for your Obamacare for you.

    So you can bash the way they eat but they shouldn't bash the way you eat?
  • Posts: 10,161 Member
    I'm sure it's been said, but no one bashes clean eaters' diets.

    What people bash are the totally unscientific BS claims that many clean eaters make about food. They bash the idea that clean eating provides benefits for body composition or health despite the lack of evidence for those claims.
  • Posts: 28,072 Member
    Don't take the "clean eating bashing" personally.

    It's primarily the ones who've had difficulties with their weight in the past. They've decided (or are unable) to not give up foods high in fat and sugar (i.e. "junk food"), and due to whatever limited success they've had, believe there is something wrong with those who desire to cut such things out of their diet.

    They'll tell you how healthy they are, and talk about their great "blood work."

    They'll also ask you to provide "peer reviewed studies" to support your claims that the food you eat can affect your long-term health, while attributing their views to universal truths.

    Umm...excuse me?
  • Posts: 28,072 Member

    It was not implied. You inferred it.

    3 Reasons: Meeting your nutritional needs before you eat exclusively snacks is on its face better for you or nutritional guidelines would not exist at all. Twinkies take a great deal of processing and transporting of ingredients to accomplish, which contributes to water and air pollution, neither or which are good for you. Twinkies contain a lot of corn-based ingredients which contribute to the mono-cropping of American and threaten the sustainability of the food system.

    Do your own freaking research on Twinkies. You are lazy for making me do it for you.

    I see some people on here that survive exclusively on fast food and I really don't want to pay for your Obamacare for you.

    Reading through the thread, and OP, ironically, you just did exactly what pisses most people off.
  • Posts: 16,947 Member
    I don't bash clean eating. If that's your thing - more power to you.



    I do, however, bash the self-righteous, pompous *kitten* who try to tell me it's the ONLY WAY to be healthy.
  • Posts: 9,532 Member
    Great. Yet another *****-fest about "clean" eating wherein nobody provides a coherent definition of "clean eating".
  • Posts: 3,536 Member
    In late...... brought some popcorn and a gazelle....... :happy:

    2irukv5jpg.gif
  • Posts: 436 Member

    where do you draw the line at "processed"...how exactly are the black beans in a can so much filthier than if I spent all day making my own black beans? When it comes down to it, everything has some, at least, minimal processing just to get it to your store.


    For me...personally....the line is drawn at what I can afford and what I can't live without.

    Boxed dinners (hamburger helper etc) I will not buy. I do buy organic cereal but rarely eat it (cereal doesn't agree with me).
    I buy my veggies, fruits, and eggs from my local farmers as much as I can. I get organic if I can afford it.
    Protein....Can't afford the high dollar stuff.

    Ben and Jerry's....will not live without
  • Posts: 15,267 Member

    Umm...excuse me?

    That's what I said then went and got chester cheese popcorn
This discussion has been closed.