lol thought this pic parodied feminism well(Women only pls)
Replies
-
... removed a bunch of drivel...
You just destroyed our marriage with your self centered chauvinistic behavior, therefore making divorce statistics skyrocket in the last decade. AKA detrimental/destructive to society.
Checkmate.
FIFY0 -
I think you're pointing right at the issue without realizing it.
That hamburger is an object. It is one dimensional.
Women are subjects. When you compare the images in the media with images of real women, you're treating them as objects or one-dimensional things. The thing that makes the "real woman" beautiful isn't that she's more aesthetically pleasing, it's that she's not an object. The "real woman" is a subject with a multi-dimesional personality and life. Her looks reflect the life she's lived and her experiences.
The hamburger exists for your pleasure and enjoyment. The woman belongs to herself and her appearance is not for you.
Which brings me back to this ace in the whole I have been waiting to trap you all with since page one ^
You belong to you, you don't belong to me. Since the essence of love is giving yourself to someone, the essence of the romance, you make yourself unlikable, unlovable, due to your insecurity. Giving yourself like that to a man is the only reason for him to sacrifice his life. And if you are too stubborn, proud, empowered to do that, you destroy the potential for love to thrive therefore destroying the family unit.
This comes back full circle to how the burger is self destructive. You just destroyed our marriage with your self centered feminist behavior, therefore making divorce statistics skyrocket in the last decade. AKA detrimental/destructive to society.
Checkmate.
No. The essence of romance is NOT giving yourself to the other person. Have you ever been in a successful long term relationship? In a relationship you still belong to yourself, you just share your life with someone else, your life, not your self. I love my husband. We share our lives, our home, our money, our children, most of our free time, our future, our families, etc. But my life does not belong to him. I consult him on major decisions but they are still mine to make. He has his own life, hobbies, friends. He makes his decisions. He doesn't control me, I don't control him. If all we had was each other, we'd probably murder each other.
Thats not love. Feminism is a cancer to true love.
You don't know what true love is.
I know what its like and its way more passionate than anything you could imagine. You're not even in love you're in a partnership.0 -
Ok, so to those who outed the OPs bb.com thread, which is drizzled in its own douche nougat;
And the guy who paraphrased Vinz Clortho:
Thank you.0 -
Noooooooo!!!! Whyyyyyyyyy??!?!!!First things first: It's "ace in the hole".
Now, onto more important issues: A woman can both belong to herself and still give herself to another. You should never lose yourself in someone else, or what is left? A shadow of self? A sad image of what you think your partner wants? That's not right. That's not a healthy relationship. It's just sad.
Should mention OP is also a big fan of Twilight as a model for ideal relationships.....
Whole troll thread about it's literary superiority.
0 -
I think you're pointing right at the issue without realizing it.
That hamburger is an object. It is one dimensional.
Women are subjects. When you compare the images in the media with images of real women, you're treating them as objects or one-dimensional things. The thing that makes the "real woman" beautiful isn't that she's more aesthetically pleasing, it's that she's not an object. The "real woman" is a subject with a multi-dimesional personality and life. Her looks reflect the life she's lived and her experiences.
The hamburger exists for your pleasure and enjoyment. The woman belongs to herself and her appearance is not for you.
Which brings me back to this ace in the whole I have been waiting to trap you all with since page one ^
You belong to you, you don't belong to me. Since the essence of love is giving yourself to someone, the essence of the romance, you make yourself unlikable, unlovable, due to your insecurity. Giving yourself like that to a man is the only reason for him to sacrifice his life. And if you are too stubborn, proud, empowered to do that, you destroy the potential for love to thrive therefore destroying the family unit.
This comes back full circle to how the burger is self destructive. You just destroyed our marriage with your self centered feminist behavior, therefore making divorce statistics skyrocket in the last decade. AKA detrimental/destructive to society.
Checkmate.
No. The essence of romance is NOT giving yourself to the other person. Have you ever been in a successful long term relationship? In a relationship you still belong to yourself, you just share your life with someone else, your life, not your self. I love my husband. We share our lives, our home, our money, our children, most of our free time, our future, our families, etc. But my life does not belong to him. I consult him on major decisions but they are still mine to make. He has his own life, hobbies, friends. He makes his decisions. He doesn't control me, I don't control him. If all we had was each other, we'd probably murder each other.
Thats not love. Feminism is a cancer to true love.
You don't know what true love is.
I know what its like and its way more passionate than anything you could imagine. You're not even in love you're in a partnership.
you cannot be in love with your hand, no matter how giving it is.
just saying.0 -
Noooooooo!!!! Whyyyyyyyyy??!?!!!First things first: It's "ace in the hole".
Now, onto more important issues: A woman can both belong to herself and still give herself to another. You should never lose yourself in someone else, or what is left? A shadow of self? A sad image of what you think your partner wants? That's not right. That's not a healthy relationship. It's just sad.
Should mention OP is also a big fan of Twilight as a model for ideal relationships.....
Whole troll thread about it's literary superiority.
That's pretty much what I've had to do. I just show up for the giggles now. I'll admit I ALMOST got sucked in to engaging in this one though. It's a very effective topic.0 -
I think you're pointing right at the issue without realizing it.
That hamburger is an object. It is one dimensional.
Women are subjects. When you compare the images in the media with images of real women, you're treating them as objects or one-dimensional things. The thing that makes the "real woman" beautiful isn't that she's more aesthetically pleasing, it's that she's not an object. The "real woman" is a subject with a multi-dimesional personality and life. Her looks reflect the life she's lived and her experiences.
The hamburger exists for your pleasure and enjoyment. The woman belongs to herself and her appearance is not for you.
Which brings me back to this ace in the whole I have been waiting to trap you all with since page one ^
You belong to you, you don't belong to me. Since the essence of love is giving yourself to someone, the essence of the romance, you make yourself unlikable, unlovable, due to your insecurity. Giving yourself like that to a man is the only reason for him to sacrifice his life. And if you are too stubborn, proud, empowered to do that, you destroy the potential for love to thrive therefore destroying the family unit.
This comes back full circle to how the burger is self destructive. You just destroyed our marriage with your self centered feminist behavior, therefore making divorce statistics skyrocket in the last decade. AKA detrimental/destructive to society.
Checkmate.
No. The essence of romance is NOT giving yourself to the other person. Have you ever been in a successful long term relationship? In a relationship you still belong to yourself, you just share your life with someone else, your life, not your self. I love my husband. We share our lives, our home, our money, our children, most of our free time, our future, our families, etc. But my life does not belong to him. I consult him on major decisions but they are still mine to make. He has his own life, hobbies, friends. He makes his decisions. He doesn't control me, I don't control him. If all we had was each other, we'd probably murder each other.
Thats not love. Feminism is a cancer to true love.
You don't know what true love is.
I know what its like and its way more passionate than anything you could imagine. You're not even in love you're in a partnership.
you cannot be in love with your hand, no matter how giving it is.
just saying.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:0 -
Oh, crap. I'm not sure how I'm going to break this to my husband after 21 years of happy marriage when I see him tonight. :indifferent:No. The essence of romance is NOT giving yourself to the other person. Have you ever been in a successful long term relationship? In a relationship you still belong to yourself, you just share your life with someone else, your life, not your self. I love my husband. We share our lives, our home, our money, our children, most of our free time, our future, our families, etc. But my life does not belong to him. I consult him on major decisions but they are still mine to make. He has his own life, hobbies, friends. He makes his decisions. He doesn't control me, I don't control him. If all we had was each other, we'd probably murder each other.
Thats not love. Feminism is a cancer to true love.
You don't know what true love is.
I know what its like and its way more passionate than anything you could imagine. You're not even in love you're in a partnership.0 -
Its a bit disturbing to feel out how many people seem to not even acknowledge the idea that feminism is detrimental to society.
Its like the idea that its possible is not even on your radar which is quite appalling to consider the chaotic irresponsibility of it all.
yes... yes indeed.
us weak females need you big strong manly men to protect us and save us and kill our spiders. but only if you are ripped and have sexy bodies. Because that is the only way we can know that you are happy and fulfilled.
no really... I DO need someone to kill my spiders.
All funning aside... I like being strong, powerful, self-sufficient.. because then I can pick the man I want to be with for the man he is, and not for what he can provide for me. I am with who I am with because I WANT to be. Not because I HAVE to be.
Maybe that is what scares the OP.
Which is why you are more likely to be divorced, men want to be needed. If you makes us feel insecure you will divorce my *kitten*.
Fify
Anybody noticed that OP wrote in another post he dated only girls that were 8 to 12 years younger than him (between 15 and 19)? I guess he desperately needs a girl that makes him feel accepted. He seems really insecure. I guess this is why feminism scares him that much. And why he reduces himself in some posts to the mere appearance: He doesn't consider himself of any value other than what his male genitals and his six-packs give to him. And now those bad feminists tell him that male genitals and testosterone don't make him superior and needed and that a nice body isn't all counts. That's gotta be frustrating.0 -
It's all he has to protect his weak internalized self from intense feelings of shame.Its a bit disturbing to feel out how many people seem to not even acknowledge the idea that feminism is detrimental to society.
Its like the idea that its possible is not even on your radar which is quite appalling to consider the chaotic irresponsibility of it all.
yes... yes indeed.
us weak females need you big strong manly men to protect us and save us and kill our spiders. but only if you are ripped and have sexy bodies. Because that is the only way we can know that you are happy and fulfilled.
no really... I DO need someone to kill my spiders.
All funning aside... I like being strong, powerful, self-sufficient.. because then I can pick the man I want to be with for the man he is, and not for what he can provide for me. I am with who I am with because I WANT to be. Not because I HAVE to be.
Maybe that is what scares the OP.
Which is why you are more likely to be divorced, men want to be needed. If you makes us feel insecure you will divorce my *kitten*.
Fify
Anybody noticed that OP wrote in another post he dated only girls that were 8 to 12 years younger than him (between 15 and 19)? I guess he desperately needs a girl that makes him feel accepted. He seems really insecure. I guess this is why feminism scares him that much. And why he reduces himself in some posts to the mere appearance: He doesn't consider himself of any value other than what his male genitals and his six-packs give to him. And now those bad feminists tell him that male genitals and testosterone don't make him superior and needed and that a nice body isn't all counts. That's gotta be frustrating.0 -
Its a bit disturbing to feel out how many people seem to not even acknowledge the idea that feminism is detrimental to society.
Its like the idea that its possible is not even on your radar which is quite appalling to consider the chaotic irresponsibility of it all.
yes... yes indeed.
us weak females need you big strong manly men to protect us and save us and kill our spiders. but only if you are ripped and have sexy bodies. Because that is the only way we can know that you are happy and fulfilled.
no really... I DO need someone to kill my spiders.
All funning aside... I like being strong, powerful, self-sufficient.. because then I can pick the man I want to be with for the man he is, and not for what he can provide for me. I am with who I am with because I WANT to be. Not because I HAVE to be.
Maybe that is what scares the OP.
Which is why you are more likely to be divorced, men want to be needed. If you makes us feel insecure you will divorce my *kitten*.
Fify
Anybody noticed that OP wrote in another post he dated only girls that were 8 to 12 years younger than him (between 15 and 19)? I guess he desperately needs a girl that makes him feel accepted. He seems really insecure. I guess this is why feminism scares him that much. And why he reduces himself in some posts to the mere appearance: He doesn't consider himself of any value other than what his male genitals and his six-packs give to him. And now those bad feminists tell him that male genitals and testosterone don't make him superior and needed and that a nice body isn't all counts. That's gotta be frustrating.
He admitted to being a pedophile? Seriously?0 -
Its a bit disturbing to feel out how many people seem to not even acknowledge the idea that feminism is detrimental to society.
Its like the idea that its possible is not even on your radar which is quite appalling to consider the chaotic irresponsibility of it all.
yes... yes indeed.
us weak females need you big strong manly men to protect us and save us and kill our spiders. but only if you are ripped and have sexy bodies. Because that is the only way we can know that you are happy and fulfilled.
no really... I DO need someone to kill my spiders.
All funning aside... I like being strong, powerful, self-sufficient.. because then I can pick the man I want to be with for the man he is, and not for what he can provide for me. I am with who I am with because I WANT to be. Not because I HAVE to be.
Maybe that is what scares the OP.
Which is why you are more likely to be divorced, men want to be needed. If you makes us feel insecure you will divorce my *kitten*.
Fify
Anybody noticed that OP wrote in another post he dated only girls that were 8 to 12 years younger than him (between 15 and 19)? I guess he desperately needs a girl that makes him feel accepted. He seems really insecure. I guess this is why feminism scares him that much. And why he reduces himself in some posts to the mere appearance: He doesn't consider himself of any value other than what his male genitals and his six-packs give to him. And now those bad feminists tell him that male genitals and testosterone don't make him superior and needed and that a nice body isn't all counts. That's gotta be frustrating.
Yeah girls that still have a lust for life and like me and need me for who I am, because I complete them. Before they become "damaged" and insecure.0 -
I think you're pointing right at the issue without realizing it.
That hamburger is an object. It is one dimensional.
Women are subjects. When you compare the images in the media with images of real women, you're treating them as objects or one-dimensional things. The thing that makes the "real woman" beautiful isn't that she's more aesthetically pleasing, it's that she's not an object. The "real woman" is a subject with a multi-dimesional personality and life. Her looks reflect the life she's lived and her experiences.
The hamburger exists for your pleasure and enjoyment. The woman belongs to herself and her appearance is not for you.
Which brings me back to this ace in the whole I have been waiting to trap you all with since page one ^
You belong to you, you don't belong to me. Since the essence of love is giving yourself to someone, the essence of the romance, you make yourself unlikable, unlovable, due to your insecurity. Giving yourself like that to a man is the only reason for him to sacrifice his life. And if you are too stubborn, proud, empowered to do that, you destroy the potential for love to thrive therefore destroying the family unit.
This comes back full circle to how the burger is self destructive. You just destroyed our marriage with your self centered feminist behavior, therefore making divorce statistics skyrocket in the last decade. AKA detrimental/destructive to society.
Checkmate.
No. The essence of romance is NOT giving yourself to the other person. Have you ever been in a successful long term relationship? In a relationship you still belong to yourself, you just share your life with someone else, your life, not your self. I love my husband. We share our lives, our home, our money, our children, most of our free time, our future, our families, etc. But my life does not belong to him. I consult him on major decisions but they are still mine to make. He has his own life, hobbies, friends. He makes his decisions. He doesn't control me, I don't control him. If all we had was each other, we'd probably murder each other.
Thats not love. Feminism is a cancer to true love.
You don't know what true love is.
I know what its like and its way more passionate than anything you could imagine. You're not even in love you're in a partnership.
you cannot be in love with your hand, no matter how giving it is.
just saying.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
0 -
Its a bit disturbing to feel out how many people seem to not even acknowledge the idea that feminism is detrimental to society.
Its like the idea that its possible is not even on your radar which is quite appalling to consider the chaotic irresponsibility of it all.
yes... yes indeed.
us weak females need you big strong manly men to protect us and save us and kill our spiders. but only if you are ripped and have sexy bodies. Because that is the only way we can know that you are happy and fulfilled.
no really... I DO need someone to kill my spiders.
All funning aside... I like being strong, powerful, self-sufficient.. because then I can pick the man I want to be with for the man he is, and not for what he can provide for me. I am with who I am with because I WANT to be. Not because I HAVE to be.
Maybe that is what scares the OP.
Which is why you are more likely to be divorced, men want to be needed. If you makes us feel insecure you will divorce my *kitten*.
Fify
Anybody noticed that OP wrote in another post he dated only girls that were 8 to 12 years younger than him (between 15 and 19)? I guess he desperately needs a girl that makes him feel accepted. He seems really insecure. I guess this is why feminism scares him that much. And why he reduces himself in some posts to the mere appearance: He doesn't consider himself of any value other than what his male genitals and his six-packs give to him. And now those bad feminists tell him that male genitals and testosterone don't make him superior and needed and that a nice body isn't all counts. That's gotta be frustrating.
Yeah girls that still have a lust for life and like me and need me for who I am, because I complete them. Before they become "damaged" and insecure.
that comes AFTER they've been with you.
sick0 -
I think you're pointing right at the issue without realizing it.
That hamburger is an object. It is one dimensional.
Women are subjects. When you compare the images in the media with images of real women, you're treating them as objects or one-dimensional things. The thing that makes the "real woman" beautiful isn't that she's more aesthetically pleasing, it's that she's not an object. The "real woman" is a subject with a multi-dimesional personality and life. Her looks reflect the life she's lived and her experiences.
The hamburger exists for your pleasure and enjoyment. The woman belongs to herself and her appearance is not for you.
Which brings me back to this ace in the whole I have been waiting to trap you all with since page one ^
You belong to you, you don't belong to me. Since the essence of love is giving yourself to someone, the essence of the romance, you make yourself unlikable, unlovable, due to your insecurity. Giving yourself like that to a man is the only reason for him to sacrifice his life. And if you are too stubborn, proud, empowered to do that, you destroy the potential for love to thrive therefore destroying the family unit.
This comes back full circle to how the burger is self destructive. You just destroyed our marriage with your self centered feminist behavior, therefore making divorce statistics skyrocket in the last decade. AKA detrimental/destructive to society.
Checkmate.
No. The essence of romance is NOT giving yourself to the other person. Have you ever been in a successful long term relationship? In a relationship you still belong to yourself, you just share your life with someone else, your life, not your self. I love my husband. We share our lives, our home, our money, our children, most of our free time, our future, our families, etc. But my life does not belong to him. I consult him on major decisions but they are still mine to make. He has his own life, hobbies, friends. He makes his decisions. He doesn't control me, I don't control him. If all we had was each other, we'd probably murder each other.
Thats not love. Feminism is a cancer to true love.
You don't know what true love is.
I know what its like and its way more passionate than anything you could imagine. You're not even in love you're in a partnership.
And how'd that work out for you? Did it last?
"True love" is passionate AND a partnership. I've been in love twice, once in highschool, and once with my husband. The high-school love was like you describe, "give yourself to him". It didn't feel good. It was crazy, chaotic, unstable, totally in love one moment, hating each other the next moment. Current love is happy, balanced. I know he loves me as much as I love him. I know we'll be together for a long time and that we have the skills to make it work when times are rough. I know that if I need him he'll be there for me. I know that he supports me in my dreams and my goals as I support him. I know that he finds me attractive and wants sex as often, if not more than I do. I can't imagine my life without him. I don't want to be without him. But ya know what? If I had to live without him, I could. It would suck for a long time but it would definitely be possible. As romantic as it seems in books and movies, it's just not healthy to really think you "can't live wihout" someone.0 -
I think you're pointing right at the issue without realizing it.
That hamburger is an object. It is one dimensional.
Women are subjects. When you compare the images in the media with images of real women, you're treating them as objects or one-dimensional things. The thing that makes the "real woman" beautiful isn't that she's more aesthetically pleasing, it's that she's not an object. The "real woman" is a subject with a multi-dimesional personality and life. Her looks reflect the life she's lived and her experiences.
The hamburger exists for your pleasure and enjoyment. The woman belongs to herself and her appearance is not for you.
Which brings me back to this ace in the whole I have been waiting to trap you all with since page one ^
You belong to you, you don't belong to me. Since the essence of love is giving yourself to someone, the essence of the romance, you make yourself unlikable, unlovable, due to your insecurity. Giving yourself like that to a man is the only reason for him to sacrifice his life. And if you are too stubborn, proud, empowered to do that, you destroy the potential for love to thrive therefore destroying the family unit.
This comes back full circle to how the burger is self destructive. You just destroyed our marriage with your self centered feminist behavior, therefore making divorce statistics skyrocket in the last decade. AKA detrimental/destructive to society.
Checkmate.
No. The essence of romance is NOT giving yourself to the other person. Have you ever been in a successful long term relationship? In a relationship you still belong to yourself, you just share your life with someone else, your life, not your self. I love my husband. We share our lives, our home, our money, our children, most of our free time, our future, our families, etc. But my life does not belong to him. I consult him on major decisions but they are still mine to make. He has his own life, hobbies, friends. He makes his decisions. He doesn't control me, I don't control him. If all we had was each other, we'd probably murder each other.
Thats not love. Feminism is a cancer to true love.
You don't know what true love is.
I know what its like and its way more passionate than anything you could imagine. You're not even in love you're in a partnership.
You can't love someone you don't respect as an equal.
You can't love someone and want them to give themselves to you completely if that means losing themselves in the process.
You can't love a woman and be against feminsm.
Your head is so full of misc crap that your view of women is completely skewed.
Telling someone who is in a successful marriage that what they are feeling is not love is beyond ridiculous, especially coming from someone who apparently is all about marriage and "the family unit".
Please start thinking for yourself, and stop embodying a stereotype just to please your alpha brahs.0 -
Its a bit disturbing to feel out how many people seem to not even acknowledge the idea that feminism is detrimental to society.
Its like the idea that its possible is not even on your radar which is quite appalling to consider the chaotic irresponsibility of it all.
yes... yes indeed.
us weak females need you big strong manly men to protect us and save us and kill our spiders. but only if you are ripped and have sexy bodies. Because that is the only way we can know that you are happy and fulfilled.
no really... I DO need someone to kill my spiders.
All funning aside... I like being strong, powerful, self-sufficient.. because then I can pick the man I want to be with for the man he is, and not for what he can provide for me. I am with who I am with because I WANT to be. Not because I HAVE to be.
Maybe that is what scares the OP.
Which is why you are more likely to be divorced, men want to be needed. If you makes us feel insecure you will divorce my *kitten*.
Fify
Anybody noticed that OP wrote in another post he dated only girls that were 8 to 12 years younger than him (between 15 and 19)? I guess he desperately needs a girl that makes him feel accepted. He seems really insecure. I guess this is why feminism scares him that much. And why he reduces himself in some posts to the mere appearance: He doesn't consider himself of any value other than what his male genitals and his six-packs give to him. And now those bad feminists tell him that male genitals and testosterone don't make him superior and needed and that a nice body isn't all counts. That's gotta be frustrating.
He admitted to being a pedophile? Seriously?
Technically an ephebophile, not a pedophile.0 -
You mean before they've had time to become developmentally mature, independent, and complete persons?Its a bit disturbing to feel out how many people seem to not even acknowledge the idea that feminism is detrimental to society.
Its like the idea that its possible is not even on your radar which is quite appalling to consider the chaotic irresponsibility of it all.
yes... yes indeed.
us weak females need you big strong manly men to protect us and save us and kill our spiders. but only if you are ripped and have sexy bodies. Because that is the only way we can know that you are happy and fulfilled.
no really... I DO need someone to kill my spiders.
All funning aside... I like being strong, powerful, self-sufficient.. because then I can pick the man I want to be with for the man he is, and not for what he can provide for me. I am with who I am with because I WANT to be. Not because I HAVE to be.
Maybe that is what scares the OP.
Which is why you are more likely to be divorced, men want to be needed. If you makes us feel insecure you will divorce my *kitten*.
Fify
Anybody noticed that OP wrote in another post he dated only girls that were 8 to 12 years younger than him (between 15 and 19)? I guess he desperately needs a girl that makes him feel accepted. He seems really insecure. I guess this is why feminism scares him that much. And why he reduces himself in some posts to the mere appearance: He doesn't consider himself of any value other than what his male genitals and his six-packs give to him. And now those bad feminists tell him that male genitals and testosterone don't make him superior and needed and that a nice body isn't all counts. That's gotta be frustrating.
Yeah girls that still have a lust for life and like me and need me for who I am, because I complete them. Before they become "damaged" and insecure.0 -
Its a bit disturbing to feel out how many people seem to not even acknowledge the idea that feminism is detrimental to society.
Its like the idea that its possible is not even on your radar which is quite appalling to consider the chaotic irresponsibility of it all.
yes... yes indeed.
us weak females need you big strong manly men to protect us and save us and kill our spiders. but only if you are ripped and have sexy bodies. Because that is the only way we can know that you are happy and fulfilled.
no really... I DO need someone to kill my spiders.
All funning aside... I like being strong, powerful, self-sufficient.. because then I can pick the man I want to be with for the man he is, and not for what he can provide for me. I am with who I am with because I WANT to be. Not because I HAVE to be.
Maybe that is what scares the OP.
Which is why you are more likely to be divorced, men want to be needed. If you makes us feel insecure you will divorce my *kitten*.
Fify
Anybody noticed that OP wrote in another post he dated only girls that were 8 to 12 years younger than him (between 15 and 19)? I guess he desperately needs a girl that makes him feel accepted. He seems really insecure. I guess this is why feminism scares him that much. And why he reduces himself in some posts to the mere appearance: He doesn't consider himself of any value other than what his male genitals and his six-packs give to him. And now those bad feminists tell him that male genitals and testosterone don't make him superior and needed and that a nice body isn't all counts. That's gotta be frustrating.
Yeah girls that still have a lust for life and like me and need me for who I am, because I complete them. Before they become "damaged" and insecure.
Interestingly enough I was waaaaay more damaged as a teenager than I am now. Just sayin'.0 -
Its a bit disturbing to feel out how many people seem to not even acknowledge the idea that feminism is detrimental to society.
Its like the idea that its possible is not even on your radar which is quite appalling to consider the chaotic irresponsibility of it all.
yes... yes indeed.
us weak females need you big strong manly men to protect us and save us and kill our spiders. but only if you are ripped and have sexy bodies. Because that is the only way we can know that you are happy and fulfilled.
no really... I DO need someone to kill my spiders.
All funning aside... I like being strong, powerful, self-sufficient.. because then I can pick the man I want to be with for the man he is, and not for what he can provide for me. I am with who I am with because I WANT to be. Not because I HAVE to be.
Maybe that is what scares the OP.
Which is why you are more likely to be divorced, men want to be needed. If you makes us feel insecure you will divorce my *kitten*.
Fify
Anybody noticed that OP wrote in another post he dated only girls that were 8 to 12 years younger than him (between 15 and 19)? I guess he desperately needs a girl that makes him feel accepted. He seems really insecure. I guess this is why feminism scares him that much. And why he reduces himself in some posts to the mere appearance: He doesn't consider himself of any value other than what his male genitals and his six-packs give to him. And now those bad feminists tell him that male genitals and testosterone don't make him superior and needed and that a nice body isn't all counts. That's gotta be frustrating.
Yeah girls that still have a lust for life and like me and need me for who I am, because I complete them. Before they become "damaged" and insecure.
Perhaps if you stayed away from them they wouldn't become damaged and insecure. It's sad that you have no idea what a woman is. You base everything you "know" about a woman on what you see in little girls. Yet another reason why I fear for my daughter.....0 -
Its a bit disturbing to feel out how many people seem to not even acknowledge the idea that feminism is detrimental to society.
Its like the idea that its possible is not even on your radar which is quite appalling to consider the chaotic irresponsibility of it all.
yes... yes indeed.
us weak females need you big strong manly men to protect us and save us and kill our spiders. but only if you are ripped and have sexy bodies. Because that is the only way we can know that you are happy and fulfilled.
no really... I DO need someone to kill my spiders.
All funning aside... I like being strong, powerful, self-sufficient.. because then I can pick the man I want to be with for the man he is, and not for what he can provide for me. I am with who I am with because I WANT to be. Not because I HAVE to be.
Maybe that is what scares the OP.
Which is why you are more likely to be divorced, men want to be needed. If you makes us feel insecure you will divorce my *kitten*.
Fify
Anybody noticed that OP wrote in another post he dated only girls that were 8 to 12 years younger than him (between 15 and 19)? I guess he desperately needs a girl that makes him feel accepted. He seems really insecure. I guess this is why feminism scares him that much. And why he reduces himself in some posts to the mere appearance: He doesn't consider himself of any value other than what his male genitals and his six-packs give to him. And now those bad feminists tell him that male genitals and testosterone don't make him superior and needed and that a nice body isn't all counts. That's gotta be frustrating.
Yeah girls that still have a lust for life and like me and need me for who I am, because I complete them. Before they become "damaged" and insecure.
They might like you because they don't know better and I guess what you mean by "damaged" is that they contradict you. Also: The younger many girls are the more they care about beauty. In every girl's life there comes the point where they start caring about personality and maybe this when they stop liking you for who you are. Just sayin'...0 -
"What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."0
-
Noooooooo!!!! Whyyyyyyyyy??!?!!!First things first: It's "ace in the hole".
Now, onto more important issues: A woman can both belong to herself and still give herself to another. You should never lose yourself in someone else, or what is left? A shadow of self? A sad image of what you think your partner wants? That's not right. That's not a healthy relationship. It's just sad.
Should mention OP is also a big fan of Twilight as a model for ideal relationships.....
Whole troll thread about it's literary superiority.
Please tell me you're joking....I don't want to look0 -
Its a bit disturbing to feel out how many people seem to not even acknowledge the idea that feminism is detrimental to society.
Its like the idea that its possible is not even on your radar which is quite appalling to consider the chaotic irresponsibility of it all.
yes... yes indeed.
us weak females need you big strong manly men to protect us and save us and kill our spiders. but only if you are ripped and have sexy bodies. Because that is the only way we can know that you are happy and fulfilled.
no really... I DO need someone to kill my spiders.
All funning aside... I like being strong, powerful, self-sufficient.. because then I can pick the man I want to be with for the man he is, and not for what he can provide for me. I am with who I am with because I WANT to be. Not because I HAVE to be.
Maybe that is what scares the OP.
Which is why you are more likely to be divorced, men want to be needed. If you makes us feel insecure you will divorce my *kitten*.
Fify
Anybody noticed that OP wrote in another post he dated only girls that were 8 to 12 years younger than him (between 15 and 19)? I guess he desperately needs a girl that makes him feel accepted. He seems really insecure. I guess this is why feminism scares him that much. And why he reduces himself in some posts to the mere appearance: He doesn't consider himself of any value other than what his male genitals and his six-packs give to him. And now those bad feminists tell him that male genitals and testosterone don't make him superior and needed and that a nice body isn't all counts. That's gotta be frustrating.
Yeah girls that still have a lust for life and like me and need me for who I am, because I complete them. Before they become "damaged" and insecure.
So we can add pedo bear to your growing list. Ok.0 -
Yeah girls that still have a lust for life and like me and need me for who I am, because I complete them. Before they become "damaged" and insecure.
Sweetheart, I hate to be the one to break it to you, but the ONLY females who would be interested in you (or at least the troll persona you put forth around here) would have to already be damaged and insecure.
No intelligent, life-loving, secure woman would give you the time of day.0 -
I think you're pointing right at the issue without realizing it.
That hamburger is an object. It is one dimensional.
Women are subjects. When you compare the images in the media with images of real women, you're treating them as objects or one-dimensional things. The thing that makes the "real woman" beautiful isn't that she's more aesthetically pleasing, it's that she's not an object. The "real woman" is a subject with a multi-dimesional personality and life. Her looks reflect the life she's lived and her experiences.
The hamburger exists for your pleasure and enjoyment. The woman belongs to herself and her appearance is not for you.
Which brings me back to this ace in the whole I have been waiting to trap you all with since page one ^
You belong to you, you don't belong to me. Since the essence of love is giving yourself to someone, the essence of the romance, you make yourself unlikable, unlovable, due to your insecurity. Giving yourself like that to a man is the only reason for him to sacrifice his life. And if you are too stubborn, proud, empowered to do that, you destroy the potential for love to thrive therefore destroying the family unit.
This comes back full circle to how the burger is self destructive. You just destroyed our marriage with your self centered feminist behavior, therefore making divorce statistics skyrocket in the last decade. AKA detrimental/destructive to society.
Checkmate.
No. The essence of romance is NOT giving yourself to the other person. Have you ever been in a successful long term relationship? In a relationship you still belong to yourself, you just share your life with someone else, your life, not your self. I love my husband. We share our lives, our home, our money, our children, most of our free time, our future, our families, etc. But my life does not belong to him. I consult him on major decisions but they are still mine to make. He has his own life, hobbies, friends. He makes his decisions. He doesn't control me, I don't control him. If all we had was each other, we'd probably murder each other.
Thats not love. Feminism is a cancer to true love.
You don't know what true love is.
I know what its like and its way more passionate than anything you could imagine. You're not even in love you're in a partnership.
And how'd that work out for you? Did it last?
"True love" is passionate AND a partnership. I've been in love twice, once in highschool, and once with my husband. The high-school love was like you describe, "give yourself to him". It didn't feel good. It was crazy, chaotic, unstable, totally in love one moment, hating each other the next moment. Current love is happy, balanced. I know he loves me as much as I love him. I know we'll be together for a long time and that we have the skills to make it work when times are rough. I know that if I need him he'll be there for me. I know that he supports me in my dreams and my goals as I support him. I know that he finds me attractive and wants sex as often, if not more than I do. I can't imagine my life without him. I don't want to be without him. But ya know what? If I had to live without him, I could. It would suck for a long time but it would definitely be possible. As romantic as it seems in books and movies, it's just not healthy to really think you "can't live wihout" someone.
Like I said, you're in a partnership.
Nothing compared to the passion and love I experience.
I think a lot of you get me wrong, I am not against feminism at all. Im the benefactor. The bad boy type, the top 20% who is getting the most benefit from the polygamous trends in society where the feminism is raising a young generation of sluts who just want me to put them on game. Guess what, us bad boys are benefiting from you guys wanting to be cool like us. I no longer have to coerce your daughter into being FWB. She's already down.0 -
:sick:0
-
Noooooooo!!!! Whyyyyyyyyy??!?!!!First things first: It's "ace in the hole".
Now, onto more important issues: A woman can both belong to herself and still give herself to another. You should never lose yourself in someone else, or what is left? A shadow of self? A sad image of what you think your partner wants? That's not right. That's not a healthy relationship. It's just sad.
Should mention OP is also a big fan of Twilight as a model for ideal relationships.....
Whole troll thread about it's literary superiority.
Please tell me you're joking....I don't want to look
Just for you.....
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1174196-i-think-i-m-in-love?hl=I+think+I'm+in+love
*note* pretty sure scumbag was an alt account that has been removed because of MFP crack down, but said troll appears quickly in alternate guise.0 -
:sick:
This.0 -
I no longer have to coerce your daughter into being FWB. She's already down.
Heh. My daughter falls into your preferred age range and I can guarantee she wouldn't even look your way.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions