Paleo vs. Clean eating?
Replies
-
The list involves all foods high in carbs; utilise to meet your other macros while you're at it.So if I've got this correct today I should eat 800g of carbs .... mmmmmmm carbs?
Please can you send me a list of what foods I need to include in those 800g.
Actually, may be best to avoid too many of the 'whole grains' and vegetables high in fibre, consider 'white alternatives'*.
And yes, if you are planning to do an ultra-marathon on the day after and weigh about the same as me, eating 800g of carbs is a pretty decent idea, I'd say!
*Having a lot of fibre the day before a long run may not be ideal for your guts!
And sadly, yes, I probably COULD document my weight loss and so on, claim that it's purely the food *I* like to eat that did it, get some decent marketing and sell loads of copies.
But when the reality is I haven't seen any decent evidence that food choices make a big difference (apart from intolerances/allergies/etc), I'd feel a bit bad getting people to cough up as it could be condensed to...
"Calorie deficit. Get enough protein and micronutrients. Do exercise if you want to be generally fit too."
So, there you go - my book, for you, for free!
Could you explain what nutrients are missing from a McDonalds burger that you would get in the same weight of meat you eat?
For the calories you consume I think there are plenty of MICRO nutrients missing - compared to more nutrient efficient alternatives.
But hey Guru Gee if you say I have to chug a McDondald's then that's what I'll do - If it fits my Macros - right!!!
Do you assume there is no macro or micronutrient benefit from a mcdonalds egg mcmuffin sandwhich? Because it's just egg, cheese, canadian bacon and an english muffin.
Also, carb loading is very conducive towards his exercise needs.
I think you may have misread my post!
'compared to more nutrient efficient alternatives'.
In regards to carb loading when doing heavy exercising - totally agree - feed the muscles.0 -
It's just a fad, it seems most people would rather brag about themselves being Paleo or "clean eaters" than anything. I guess they think it's a status symbol to uneducated unfit people but the rest of us just think they are pretentious and wasting their time.
Calorie deficit and get all of your nutrients and you will be healthy and lose weight! You could even eat McDonald's!!!!! O.o
I.C.E. Cream Official Tester
IKEA Professional Put Together-er
Kickboxing Class Attender
Been in fitness for about 2 years and have studied kinesiology, nutrition and Dinosaurs0 -
Which ones?For the calories you consume I think there are plenty of MICRO nutrients missing - compared to more nutrient efficient alternatives.
What are you basing this on, that there are more micronutrients in the meat you consume?
If you have ACTUAL evidence, I would be GENUINELY interested to hear it!
Also, do you think it matters, if your diet already contains enough of these micronutrients?
Oh and I haven't said you HAVE to do either. Infact, quite the opposite you'll note the very basis of the way I choose what to eat goes around "foods I like to eat"! I am about choice, not restrictions, unless there's good evidence to back up why you should restrict.
(For instance, there is some evidence that if you're obese and unfit, that you should avoid too many simple carbs - however, while I am literally *just* below the 'overweight' BMI, in reality I think I'm probably certainly a little lower than average leaness and also fitter than average - not suggesting I'm in amazing shape, but certainly "better than average"
). 0 -
I haven't read the entire thread, because I'm tired and I need to get ready for work. But here's my two cents:
There are varying definitions of "eating clean" and even "paleo." It's going to be impossible to find a consensus on either of those terms. And it's going to be impossible to find a consensus on whether or not either is healthier or necessary.
So take a look at your current diet. Are you feeling good eating the way you are? Are you having success and reaching your goals? If so, great! You may not need to change anything. But if you're not having success, or if you want to make a change to make your eating habits even better than they are right now, take a look at what you're eating now and think about one way you could improve it. Something that's achievable and sustainable for you in the long term. Then make that change, and monitor how your body reacts. If you feel even better, then it's a good change, and you should stick with it. If it makes you feel bad, or if you're struggling with sticking to it, then perhaps now is not the time to make that particular change.
The way you eat and the way you exercise are very personal choices. Yes, there are some things that are healthier for everybody, but even at that, your own personality comes into play, and some things are just not sustainable for some people. So as long as you're continually looking to make improvements that are reasonable and sustainable for you and your lifestyle, you're doing well.0 -
How about a moderate calorie deficit, with some attention paid to macro and micro nutrient content?
pfffff who needs that when you can put on a loin cloth, grab a spear, and go hunt down a wooly mammoth….?
just in the interests of scientific accuracy..... palaeolithic humans would not have bothered with the loin cloth. Modesty is a modern concept and any depiction of palaeolithic people in loincloths is purely so as not to offend the sensibilities of modern people, and is also totally unrealistic. Loincloths are utterly useless as clothes as they don't keep you warm. They're only for people who for whatever cultural reasons prefer to keep their genitals covered, which seems to be a modern phenomenon.
agreed…..I was just putting that in there for idiotic emphasis..:)
that's cool I wanted to emphasise some of the wider implications of being hardcore about going paleo........ don't just eat paleo,... wear paleo.... i mean modern people tend to be lacking in vitamin D due to not getting enough sunlight on their skin... :happy: 
:drinker: :bigsmile: 0 -
Which ones?For the calories you consume I think there are plenty of MICRO nutrients missing - compared to more nutrient efficient alternatives.
What are you basing this on, that there are more micronutrients in the meat you consume?
If you have ACTUAL evidence, I would be GENUINELY interested to hear it!
Oh and I haven't said you HAVE to do either. Infact, quite the opposite you'll note the very basis of the way I choose what to eat goes around "foods I like to eat"! I am about choice, not restrictions, unless there's good evidence to back up why you should restrict.
(For instance, there is some evidence that if you're obese and unfit, that you should avoid too many simple carbs - however, while I am literally *just* below the 'overweight' BMI, in reality I think I'm probably certainly a little lower than average leaness and also fitter than average - not suggesting I'm in amazing shape, but certainly "better than average").
So you actually believe for the calorie intake you get from your McDonalds meal - and you could not eat a single alternative meal that would not give you a higher and broader level of Micro Nutrients?
Please I would love to read your chapter on that one.
If you CHOOSE not to eat grains - how is that a RESTRICTION?0 -
I also eat Paleo/Primal, which actually came out of my 2 year old's diagnosis of a dairy protein allergy (different from lactose intolerance), and gluten sensitivity, suspected celiacs but she is too tiny to be fully tested.
My hubby and I both started this with her, almost 2 years ago now. She was so little that we didn't want to be giving her one thing for dinner and telling her she couldn't eat what we were having. It grew into our diet now, which has introduced organic goats milk cheese on occasion, but a primary focus on high quality meats, vegetables, fruits, healthy fats and no grains. We do have legumes on occasion, but we have learned that my husband's lifetime of bowel issues (IBS, constant gut rot and heartburn) was very much associated to our diet, and has completely disappeared within 30 days of eating pale/primal.
Did we give up ice cream and pizza forever, heck no! On occasion we have these things, but are prepared to feel crappy the next day if we do! Our energy has increased significantly, our mental focus has become incredible, and we feel incredible all around.
It's not for everyone though! I started looking into nutrition of different foods, wanting to make sure that my significantly underweight 2 year old was getting appropriate nutrients from the foods we were eating, and started to make choices based on nutrient density… naturally this led to the pale diet (with her restrictions). I do believe it is worth trying, there are so many recipes and ideas online, but the key part of Paleo is not just the foods you are eating, but making sure you are eating the appropriate amounts of healthy fats and nutritious foods! For me, I end up eating a lot more food than others do, because the lower calorie of the foods I do consume.0 -
It's just a fad, it seems most people would rather brag about themselves being Paleo or "clean eaters" than anything. I guess they think it's a status symbol to uneducated unfit people but the rest of us just think they are pretentious and wasting their time.
Calorie deficit and get all of your nutrients and you will be healthy and lose weight! You could even eat McDonald's!!!!! O.o
I can has GMOs?0 -
It's just a fad, it seems most people would rather brag about themselves being Paleo or "clean eaters" than anything. I guess they think it's a status symbol to uneducated unfit people but the rest of us just think they are pretentious and wasting their time.
Calorie deficit and get all of your nutrients and you will be healthy and lose weight! You could even eat McDonald's!!!!! O.o
I can has GMOs?
GMO's are fine!!! People don't even know what it actually means and they freak out!
I.C.E. Cream Official Tester
IKEA Professional Put Together-er
Kickboxing Class Attender
Been in fitness for about 2 years and have studied kinesiology, nutrition and Dinosaurs0 -
I do not believe that and have not said that. That you've tried to infer that from my question, where I'm trying to gain more knowledge is the sort of thing that will get people labelling you as a "troll".So you actually believe for the calorie intake you get from your McDonalds meal - and you could not eat a single alternative meal that would not give you a higher and broader level of Micro Nutrients?
So, lets try again.
Do you believe the meat in a McDonalds burger has less micronutrients than the meat you eat?
A simple 'yes', or 'no' will be fine here!
If you do, could you provide some backup to explain why you believe that.
Next, if you have already had enough micronutrients of that kind, do you think that having more will be beneficial?0 -
I do not believe that and have not said that. That you've tried to infer that from my question, where I'm trying to gain more knowledge is the sort of thing that will get people labelling you as a "troll".So you actually believe for the calorie intake you get from your McDonalds meal - and you could not eat a single alternative meal that would not give you a higher and broader level of Micro Nutrients?
So, lets try again.
Do you believe the meat in a McDonalds burger has less micronutrients than the meat you eat?
A simple 'yes', or 'no' will be fine here!
If you do, could you provide some backup to explain why you believe that.
Next, if you have already had enough micronutrients of that kind, do you think that having more will be beneficial?
I'm sorry - not trolling - a natural assumption.
I stated that For the calories you consume I think there are plenty of MICRO nutrients missing - compared to more nutrient efficient alternatives.
That's a pretty straight forward statement - but I'll break it down.
What I am stating is that for the calories there are in a McDonalds meal - I BELIEVE that eating the same number of calories from another meal (made from different foods - for argument sake's organic grass feed beef - fresh steamed vegetables) you would be getting more mirco nutrients than eating the Mcdonald's meal.
You seem to disagree with that so I was trying to clarify if you though otherwise. Because if you did and could explain why I had got it wrong - I could have learned something - and gained more knowledge.
So a simple answer is No I do not believe I will get as many micro nutrients from a comparable calorie intake comparing my food and McDonalds - DO YOU?0 -
Also are you able to answer the question - how is CHOOSING not to eat something a RESTRICTION?0
-
wow do not want to start an argument lol...
I pretty much been doing what you have been doing so far and had great success.. I just wanted to make an attempt to eat healthier..
If you've had success, I personally wouldn't change anything... but if you think no processed foods might help feel better or have more success, why not try it?
Some people swear by no processed foods, others don't really care. Both groups have had success, so I think it's just a personal preference.
I don't think you'll get a consistent definition about what paleo or clean eating actually is though. Maybe start by trying what you think it is?
I like this answer and would add: as it would work for you over the long haul.
Also, I'd avoid using "clean" or "paleo/primal" to describe your dietary choices, as that (in my not-so-humble opinion) makes people appear to be pretentious and douchy.
If I had health restrictions, I'd go with something like "lactose issue minimizing" to describe the way I eat.
For me, I have a focus on eating more fresh fruits and veges because they really taste good and are full of nice micros.0 -
Therefore by that reasoning everybody is on a restrictive diet.
This morning I was going to have some eggs - but I chose not to (I was late for work and didn't have time to cook them).
So today I am on an Egg restricted diet.
Okay that makes sense - thanks for clearing that up.0 -
Also are you able to answer the question - how is CHOOSING not to eat something a RESTRICTION?
Um...I'll hazard a guess.. it's because you've CHOSEN to RESTRICT something from your diet.
:laugh:0 -
What he's saying is, if he's already met his daily micro's why would a McD's burger be a wrong choice especially if it helps a person's adherence. Also not everyone can arbitrarily remove complete food groups successfully and if a person can then it's like you say a choice and not a restriction. You guys......:happy:Also are you able to answer the question - how is CHOOSING not to eat something a RESTRICTION?0 -
If you are interested in adding a wider variety of nutritious food into your diet, I really like the recipes in the "Abs Diet Cookbook" even though I don't agree with the "Abs Diet"0
-
So can I get this clear in my head - if I chose not to each grains then it's still a restriction because I have chosen not have them?
Probably what is a clearer explanation of how I eat is:
In the course of the day I do not even think about eating grains - the idea of a bowl of cereal doesn't enter the equation - at lunch I do not think mmmm a nice sandwich would be good.
Therefore if I do not want to eat a particular food group - because it does not appeal to me - is that a restriction?0 -
I think when we talk about restricting food what we are really talking about is feeling limited/deprived.
Some people will give up processed junk and feel so sad because ALL THEY WANT IS TEH JUNK. If they can lose fat and feel healthy even by eating the junk because it fits in the macros or a big calorie deficit or whatever, then good for them!
Some people will give up processed junk and feel GREAT. Even though they are restricting/limiting things from their diet, they felt sick from those things and getting rid of them actually gives them energy and happiness in addition to fat loss. In which case, good for them!
If paleo/clean eating isn't appealing to you, no one is making you do so! But since the OP asked for people with this perspective...people with this experience are presenting their experiences.0 -
Therefore by that reasoning everybody is on a restrictive diet.
This morning I was going to have some eggs - but I chose not to (I was late for work and didn't have time to cook them).
So today I am on an Egg restricted diet.
Okay that makes sense - thanks for clearing that up.
Do you understand the difference between "I didn't have eggs this morning" and "I do not eat eggs"?
Seriously just stop being obtuse.
I'm sorry but I do not think I am the one who is slow to understand.
People calling certain diets restrictive (for everyone) are basing there assumptions on their own limitations.
Most people happily enjoying the benefits of paleo/primal/clean eating - you name it, have moved beyond craving food they choose not to eat and no longer want to eat those types of food - therefore there not restricting anything from their diets.0 -
How about a moderate calorie deficit, with some attention paid to macro and micro nutrient content?
pfffff who needs that when you can put on a loin cloth, grab a spear, and go hunt down a wooly mammoth….?
just in the interests of scientific accuracy..... palaeolithic humans would not have bothered with the loin cloth. Modesty is a modern concept and any depiction of palaeolithic people in loincloths is purely so as not to offend the sensibilities of modern people, and is also totally unrealistic. Loincloths are utterly useless as clothes as they don't keep you warm. They're only for people who for whatever cultural reasons prefer to keep their genitals covered, which seems to be a modern phenomenon.
agreed…..I was just putting that in there for idiotic emphasis..:)
that's cool I wanted to emphasize some of the wider implications of being hardcore about going paleo........ don't just eat paleo,... wear paleo.... i mean modern people tend to be lacking in vitamin D due to not getting enough sunlight on their skin... :happy: :drinker: :bigsmile:
I love you so hard!0 -
Honestly, if you are hungry, you should eat even if that means going over. One day won't hurt. There are weeks I do not lose weight because it's more important to me to enjoy foods. For me, this is a long term goal, not a short term thing. For example, in two weeks we are having a going away party for a colleague of mine. It is going to be an all you can eat Korean buffet. I would be heart broken if I don't hit 10,000 calories. I am getting my moneys worth. It may be my only meal that day, but its soooo worth it.IIFYM
I have a gif for that but sadly I think it will be deleted - all gifs 'in moderation' right.
I think I have posted - a number of times - I am not anti calorie counting (it just is not for me) I understand it works for a lot of people and that's great.
IIFYM is certainly one way of achieving your goal. If you are unable to cut back on your carbs and your happy and healthy with that then that's another way. If you want to eat low carb, high fat that again is another way.
All and yes I will use the words ALL diets have restrictions - some cannot live with the restriction of cutting out certain foods and that's fine.
I personally cannot live with the restriction of having to stop eating when I am still hungry, because have reached my calorie target for the day!!! Different horses for different courses.
All diets require a sacrifice - you just chose the one that's easier to bear.
Well I think I'm face palmed out for the evening.
Night all.
If you don't have a medical issue, you should be able to eat to satiety and not be hungry until right before your next meal. It might take some experiment to figure out what foods work for you to get you there.
While I like the *idea* of not doing anything you can't do for the duration (especially in relationship to juice fasts), in practice, I've tried a whole bunch of strategies at different times and continued using the individual tactics that work best for me when the strategy became untenable.0 -
Isn't most of this debate silly? Eat Paleo or don't eat Paleo. There are some that apparently think doing so is a status symbol or makes you douchy. I have no idea where these people live that such a diet is a status symbol, but so be it. Others think that such an assertion is ridiculous.
Do what works for you and don't worry about the peanut gallery.0 -
Isn't most of this debate silly? Eat Paleo or don't eat Paleo. There are some that apparently think doing so is a status symbol or makes you douchy. I have no idea where these people live that such a diet is a status symbol, but so be it. Others think that such an assertion is ridiculous.
Do what works for you and don't worry about the peanut gallery.
It is silly.
OP, I wouldn't do it if what you're doing is working. If later on you're stalling and you try something new and it works for you, more power to you. My personal advice on adhering to a certain "diet" is to not do anything you don't see yourself continuing for the rest of your life. That applies to exercise too. Do something you enjoy and benefit from.0 -
If you CHOOSE... to not eat a certain food... as a part of your diet... you've RESTRICTED IT...from your diet.Therefore by that reasoning everybody is on a restrictive diet.
This morning I was going to have some eggs - but I chose not to (I was late for work and didn't have time to cook them).
So today I am on an Egg restricted diet.
Okay that makes sense - thanks for clearing that up.
Do you understand the difference between "I didn't have eggs this morning" and "I do not eat eggs"?
Seriously just stop being obtuse.
I'm sorry but I do not think I am the one who is slow to understand.
People calling certain diets restrictive (for everyone) are basing there assumptions on their own limitations.
Most people happily enjoying the benefits of paleo/primal/clean eating - you name it, have moved beyond craving food they choose not to eat and no longer want to eat those types of food - therefore there not restricting anything from their diets.
That's it. That's how language works. Now you may not like the word "restrict" so you want to use something else, but that's too bad. Because you don't get to decide what words mean based on your little feelings.
Now I will take the good advice above and put you on ignore. Because everything I've read in your postings leads me to believe you're not very bright or effective at getting ideas across. Whatever your motive is behind debating on a calorie counting website the ineffectiveness of calorie counting...trust me.. you won't find many takers here. You're free to continue to waste your time. But I can do the smart thing and not read anymore of it.
Also even your memes have terrible spelling.
Check my posts - I have not every stated the inefficiency of calorie counting - I think it works very well for a lot of people.
In fact I advocate different diets for different people.
Whilst MFP is primarily a calorie counting website - it does welcome all styles of diets (I just don't think that message has filtered down to the masses).
• Flexibility
- our system can support any diet like Atkins, the South Beach Diet, the Zone, and more. No matter what diet you're on, we can help.
As you have put me on ignore I'm sure I am typing this for my own piece of mind.
Incidentally I do agree with your interpretation of restrict - I was being obtuse!! sorry.
I personally believe that all diets to a degree require a sacrifice - be it a food group or stopping eating when your still hungry. The one someone will be best suited to is the one that feels like the least payment to make.
It does baffle me that some people don't get it?0 -
Isn't most of this debate silly? Eat Paleo or don't eat Paleo. There are some that apparently think doing so is a status symbol or makes you douchy. I have no idea where these people live that such a diet is a status symbol, but so be it. Others think that such an assertion is ridiculous.
Do what works for you and don't worry about the peanut gallery.
It is silly.
OP, I wouldn't do it if what you're doing is working. If later on you're stalling and you try something new and it works for you, more power to you. My personal advice on adhering to a certain "diet" is to not do anything you don't see yourself continuing for the rest of your life. That applies to exercise too. Do something you enjoy and benefit from.
I agree with this. If you don't like a food, don't eat it. If you do like a food, then eat it. If you don't like an exercise, don't do it. If you do like an exercise, do it.
You are an adult and understand that some things take a few tries to really know whether you like it or not...and also know that not everything is going to be super-stimulating but need to be done anyway - like flossing.
However, adding things you don't enjoy or limiting things that you do because of over-blown health promises...that's where you need to consider your goals and whether the change will get you there if the health promises don't pan out.0 -
If you're goal is just to eat food that you feel is healthier, I would suggest that you just do that and not worry about definitions or what food belongs to which diet plan. Just gradually start cutting back on the things that you feel aren't so healthy and start introducing more of the ones you think are. No need to dump out your pantry if what is in there has been working for you. Just gradually shift your eating habits a little away from the boxed and processed to the fresh and lean. And I really do believe that a gradual shift is best. Making a sudden leap to a whole new way of eating can derail people sometimes.0
-
Thanks for the reply.
Well yes, if you're eating anything but a vitamin pill, that statement can be true for ANY food!I stated that For the calories you consume I think there are plenty of MICRO nutrients missing - compared to more nutrient efficient alternatives.
The rest of your answer goes on about a McDonalds meal. I was specifically talking about the meat.
Interesting that you don't know the difference, yet are a big proponent of it.
Me, I like to UNDERSTAND before I decide on my choices. So I've done a little research.
As it goes, it turns out grass-fed beef likely does offer some advantages. (Organic won't make any difference that I know.
The biggest advertised is Omega-3. Unfortunately most of the information comes from places trying to push this product/lifestyle and so on and it's taken me a while to wade through. They go on about ratios, but crucially don't mention AMOUNTS.
This author is obviously very much 'pro' the product, but takes a much more balanced view:
http://grassbasedhealth.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/is-grass-fed-beef-really-rich-in-omega.html
It MAY/probably offer higher levels of few other micronutrients, but from what I can tell not to a significant amount. Unfortunately my example does make it a little harder to compare as details for McDonalds burgers include the bun and so on, while I can separate out pure grass-fed-beef - so the percentages for nutrients in the fast food meat will naturally be lower as it's not all meat as it's listed per 100g of product.But promoting grass fed beef because of its n-6:n-3 ratio is, at best, misleading. Beef, regardless of how it is fed, in not a “rich” source of n-3 or n-6 fatty acids
So, from what I can see, in reality it's pretty similar in anything that actually matters when considering total amounts per 100g.
So, lets get back on to the MEAT. Not comparing a pile of varied steamed veg with some bread. I had copied and pasted my question yet again, but this time I've made the words 'meat' bold, so you can more easily see these meaty word.
Do you believe the meat in a McDonalds burger has less micronutrients than the meat you eat? Now that I've done my research - I'll add the caveat - to a degree that matters.
If you do, could you provide some backup to explain why you believe that.
Next, if you have already had enough micronutrients of that kind, do you think that having more will be beneficial?0 -
Therefore by that reasoning everybody is on a restrictive diet.
This morning I was going to have some eggs - but I chose not to (I was late for work and didn't have time to cook them).
So today I am on an Egg restricted diet.
Okay that makes sense - thanks for clearing that up.
Do you understand the difference between "I didn't have eggs this morning" and "I do not eat eggs"?
Seriously just stop being obtuse.
I'm sorry but I do not think I am the one who is slow to understand.
People calling certain diets restrictive (for everyone) are basing there assumptions on their own limitations.
Most people happily enjoying the benefits of paleo/primal/clean eating - you name it, have moved beyond craving food they choose not to eat and no longer want to eat those types of food - therefore there not restricting anything from their diets.
I'll say this once. Slowly, simply. I know it won't sink in. But the idiot in me has to try.
If you CHOOSE... to not eat a certain food... as a part of your diet... you've RESTRICTED IT...from your diet.
That's it. That's how language works. Now you may not like the word "restrict" so you want to use something else, but that's too bad. Because you don't get to decide what words mean based on your little feelings.
Now I will take the good advice above and put you on ignore. Because everything I've read in your postings leads me to believe you're not very bright or effective at getting ideas across. Whatever your motive is behind debating on a calorie counting website the ineffectiveness of calorie counting...trust me.. you won't find many takers here. You're free to continue to waste your time. But I can do the smart thing and not read anymore of it.
Also even your memes have terrible spelling.
+1
If I DID choose to eat Paleo/Primal, I would tell NO ONE on MFP for fear of avoid being associated with certain posters.0 -
Therefore by that reasoning everybody is on a restrictive diet.
This morning I was going to have some eggs - but I chose not to (I was late for work and didn't have time to cook them).
So today I am on an Egg restricted diet.
Okay that makes sense - thanks for clearing that up.
Do you understand the difference between "I didn't have eggs this morning" and "I do not eat eggs"?
Seriously just stop being obtuse.
I'm sorry but I do not think I am the one who is slow to understand.
People calling certain diets restrictive (for everyone) are basing there assumptions on their own limitations.
Most people happily enjoying the benefits of paleo/primal/clean eating - you name it, have moved beyond craving food they choose not to eat and no longer want to eat those types of food - therefore there not restricting anything from their diets.
If you CHOOSE... to not eat a certain food... as a part of your diet... you've RESTRICTED IT...from your diet.
That's it. That's how language works. Now you may not like the word "restrict" so you want to use something else, but that's too bad. Because you don't get to decide what words mean based on your little feelings.
Now I will take the good advice above and put you on ignore. Because everything I've read in your postings leads me to believe you're not very bright or effective at getting ideas across. Whatever your motive is behind debating on a calorie counting website the ineffectiveness of calorie counting...trust me.. you won't find many takers here. You're free to continue to waste your time. But I can do the smart thing and not read anymore of it.
Also even your memes have terrible spelling.
+1
If I DID choose to eat Paleo/Primal, I would tell NO ONE on MFP for fear of avoid being associated with certain posters.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.1K Introduce Yourself
- 43.7K Getting Started
- 260.1K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 419 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.9K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.5K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions