Viewing the message boards in:

Sugar is the CULPRIT!

Options
13567…13

Replies

  • Posts: 214 Member
    The Perricone Prescription is only one source if you take the time to look up articles on the dangers of sugar there are many to back up the fact that sugar has no nutritional value. Also, I did not say that fat was bad, I said SUGAR! And most people on here are overweight from eating too much sugar so it may not be as far out as some are assuming.
    key words here are Too Much. people get fat by eating too many calories, not by eating too much sugar. otherwise i would have been obese when i was surviving on nothing but coffee and pixy stix.

    eat-it.gif
  • Posts: 1,373 Member
    LOL! I am a troll, sugar free, thin troll thanks for noticing :)
    I am truly sad for you, OP.
  • Posts: 9,377 Member
    show previous quotes

    It's ok. As you can see other people have posted some pretty thorough reviews on his "work."

    Listen, I know this thread didn't go the way you want. I know right now you can't believe how mean people are and it stings. I'd feel the same way. I get it.

    But it's ok. You posted some bad information from a poor source. Happens to people ALL THE TIME. Because everyone is out there to make a buck of weight loss. And they know that "you should count calories and exercise" isn't going to make books fly off the shelves. So they demonize sugar. Or bread. Or fat, carbs, etc... the list doesn't end.

    If you're mad, you should be. But it should be at Dr. Perricone, not at anyone here. Hopefully you learned something today. Which isn't always easy, but it is important.

    Best wishes.

    I really like this answer, and not just the bolded part.
  • Posts: 7,166 Member
    LOL! I am a troll, sugar free, thin troll thanks for noticing :)

    So all thin people get to make stuff up and pretend it's facts? Awesome.
  • Posts: 7,010 Member
    featured_desserts.jpg
  • Posts: 51 Member
    I didn't open my mouth. I typed the message with my hands. Thanks for advice.

    My intentions were only to point out that sugar has NO not little, NO nutritional value. Foods high in glycemic index are not good for you. Didn't mean to offend anyone to the point of name calling. PLEASE, YOU EAT SUGAR! I encourage it!
  • Posts: 4,899 Member
    LOL! I am a troll, sugar free, thin troll thanks for noticing :)

    And, according to your profile, you "used to be in shape." Maybe some sugar to help your energy levels would help with that.
  • Posts: 10,321 Member
    I didn't open my mouth. I typed the message with my hands. Thanks for advice.

    My intentions were only to point out that sugar has NO not little, NO nutritional value. Foods high in glycemic index are not good for you. Didn't mean to offend anyone to the point of name calling. PLEASE, YOU EAT SUGAR! I encourage it!

    It provides fast acting energy which people who workout need. Maybe you should eat some and get in the gym and lift some weights?
  • Posts: 2,033 Member
    Sugar is dangerous....if someone drops a 200lb sack of it on your head.
  • Posts: 51 Member
    IT IS FACT! PEOPLE DO RESEARCH ABOUT SUGAR, IF YOU THEN CHOSE TO INDULGE THEN AT LEAST I GAVE YOU SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT.

    DO NOT THINK IT IS NECESSARY TO GET ANGRY AT A LINK YOU CHOOSE TO CLICK ON!
  • Posts: 28,072 Member
    I didn't open my mouth. I typed the message with my hands. Thanks for advice.

    My intentions were only to point out that sugar has NO not little, NO nutritional value. Foods high in glycemic index are not good for you. Didn't mean to offend anyone to the point of name calling. PLEASE, YOU EAT SUGAR! I encourage it!

    You are still incorrect.
  • Posts: 14,776 Member
    I didn't open my mouth. I typed the message with my hands. Thanks for advice.

    My intentions were only to point out that sugar has NO not little, NO nutritional value. Foods high in glycemic index are not good for you. Didn't mean to offend anyone to the point of name calling. PLEASE, YOU EAT SUGAR! I encourage it!

    You also added words like "addicted" and "cancer." There's a huge difference between saying something has no nutritional value (which is still arguable) and saying something causes cancer.
  • Posts: 3,472 Member
    LOL! I am a troll, sugar free, thin troll thanks for noticing :)

    Well, you're thin...why didn't just say that in the beginning??? This would have been a much more believable statement if you had just told us you were thin from the start!!!
  • Posts: 1,490 Member
    Intellectual disability is actually the culprit. Choosing not to learn and forming opinions based on non-factual "evidence" of anything. But I understand, scapegoating is easier than comprehension.
  • Posts: 3,556 Member
    IT IS FACT! PEOPLE DO RESEARCH ABOUT SUGAR, IF YOU THEN CHOSE TO INDULGE THEN AT LEAST I GAVE YOU SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT.

    DO NOT THINK IT IS NECESSARY TO GET ANGRY AT A LINK YOU CHOOSE TO CLICK ON!

    Only one that looks like they are getting angry is you. Have a snickers it will help
  • Posts: 4,899 Member
    IT IS FACT! PEOPLE DO RESEARCH ABOUT SUGAR, IF YOU THEN CHOSE TO INDULGE THEN AT LEAST I GAVE YOU SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT.

    DO NOT THINK IT IS NECESSARY TO GET ANGRY AT A LINK YOU CHOOSE TO CLICK ON!

    If you can't back it up yell loudly, or post in all caps. I love MFP! This thread needs a hug
  • Posts: 5,214 Member
    LOL! I am a troll, sugar free, thin troll thanks for noticing :)


    Guys OP is thin, she can't possibly be wrong.
  • Posts: 2,925 Member
    Obvious troll is becoming more obvious.
  • Posts: 219 Member
    Unless there's an M.D. after your name, you quote reliable, peer reviewed material or post legitimate scientific material from a non-shill...

    This is all useless conjecture.

    Also, you bragging about being "skinny" is lame.

    If you need to prop up your self esteem by trolling internet forums, you might want to consider reaching out to a licensed therapist.
  • Posts: 6,212 Member
    show previous quotes

    You are still incorrect.


    Yep

    Even though you've been given link after link proving your original premise/book is debunked quackery...

    Even though there are plenty of thin people on this thread who have disagreed with you...

    Even though you still think that your opinion makes something fact...
  • Posts: 10,321 Member
    Obvious troll is becoming more obvious.

    Agreed. Either that or a kid is playing on their parents computer again.
  • Posts: 14,776 Member
    show previous quotes

    If you can't back it up yell loudly, or post in all caps. I love MFP! This thread needs a hug

    tumblr_mggbjsDz7W1qzdmkwo2_500.gif
  • Posts: 5,214 Member
    IT IS FACT! PEOPLE DO RESEARCH ABOUT SUGAR, IF YOU THEN CHOSE TO INDULGE THEN AT LEAST I GAVE YOU SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT.

    DO NOT THINK IT IS NECESSARY TO GET ANGRY AT A LINK YOU CHOOSE TO CLICK ON!

    One person here is angry and it's you.
  • Posts: 214 Member
    the hanger has arrived.
  • Posts: 51 Member
    That is what I am going to do. Go buy a snickers, then go to the gym for 2 hours and lift weights to burn it off. Thanks, glad I posted today.
  • Posts: 28,072 Member
    show previous quotes

    It's ok. As you can see other people have posted some pretty thorough reviews on his "work."

    Listen, I know this thread didn't go the way you want. I know right now you can't believe how mean people are and it stings. I'd feel the same way. I get it.

    But it's ok. You posted some bad information from a poor source. Happens to people ALL THE TIME. Because everyone is out there to make a buck of weight loss. And they know that "you should count calories and exercise" isn't going to make books fly off the shelves. So they demonize sugar. Or bread. Or fat, carbs, etc... the list doesn't end.

    If you're mad, you should be. But it should be at Dr. Perricone, not at anyone here. Hopefully you learned something today. Which isn't always easy, but it is important.

    Best wishes.

    Does not seem so.
  • Posts: 6,212 Member
    show previous quotes

    If you can't back it up yell loudly, or post in all caps. I love MFP! This thread needs a hug

    loudnoises_zps340c1976.jpg
  • Posts: 5,214 Member
    I have big boobs and thick thighs and booty -- what does that make me if "skinny" makes one right, OP?
  • Posts: 506 Member
    show previous quotes

    You're never gonna get Bingo if you don't keep them straight!

    Hold up. Is there some sort of forum BINGO that I could be playing but don't know about?
  • Posts: 16,414 Member
    I didn't open my mouth. I typed the message with my hands. Thanks for advice.

    My intentions were only to point out that sugar has NO not little, NO nutritional value. Foods high in glycemic index are not good for you. Didn't mean to offend anyone to the point of name calling. PLEASE, YOU EAT SUGAR! I encourage it!
    Having calories is having nutritional value. Sugar gives a quick source of energy, which is necessary in many cases.

    When I was younger, I practically lived on sugary junk food and I wore size 3 (back when size 3 actually meant something before they started messing with vanity sizing). Now I eat a very healthy diet with far less sugar and I'm having health issues that are causing weight loss to be pretty much impossible.

    But I guess I should blame the 6 grams of sugar in my little bit of dark chocolate I eat every day.
This discussion has been closed.

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
Sign In
Register

Quick Links

Categories