If eating trash makes us sick, why do we keep eating it?

1111214161734

Replies

  • JeffseekingV
    JeffseekingV Posts: 3,165 Member
    Hornsby wrote: »
    J72FIT wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    roz112 wrote: »
    Firstly, i think the more junk food you eat the more your body will crave it. Granted everyone has days where they just want something super sweet, salty or just any kind of comfort food. I think with junk food its best to just cut it out cold turkey, first few weeks will be the hardest because your brain is just telling you what to crave. After a while you'll see its a lot easier to just eat generally healthier, at this point reintroduce junk food in moderation.
    I generally eat pretty healthy but i have days where i just want to eat everything in sight and then feel extremely disgusted. Ive gotten a lot better at actually enjoying the junk food i eat without feeling guilty because then i stop when im satisfied, if i dont and i just eat junk food i dont really even want i wont get satisfied so i want to eat everything.

    Please don't equate your situation and then generalize it to everyone else. I had one cookie today cause someone brought them in. Didn't crave any more. I haven't started holding up convenient stores to get my next cookie fix. Some of us are perfectly fine with moderation. Just because you don't have the willpower, don't generalize it onto everyone else.

    Wow! I did not read her post that way. Sounded like she was just sharing her experience. Take it easy pal...

    The very first line of her post..."Firstly, i think the more junk food you eat the more your body will crave it.". That is a generalization that does not apply to everyone. I wasn't being rude to the girl. Just letting her know. Not sure why you think I'm not taking it easy.

    She said "I think". I took that as a personal belief. If she said "the more junk food you eat....." then I'd agree.
  • J72FIT
    J72FIT Posts: 6,002 Member
    Actually.. a lot of junk food, especially that which includes excess sugar, accesses neural pathways in our brain akin to those that are accessed by cocaine. Sugar is so highly addictive that we keep craving more.

    I've seen coke addicts sniff the stuff off the floor... I have NEVER seen anyone so addicted to sugar that they would lick it off the floor...
  • GenesiaElizabeth
    GenesiaElizabeth Posts: 227 Member
    LAWoman72 wrote: »
    There's a cute story that still goes around my family. When my sister was ready to enter kindergarten, she was right at the cutoff point for her birth date (her birthday is in November). So it was between having her start school at four-going-on-five, or having her wait the year and have her be approaching six when she entered school.

    My sister was (and is) very bright, so my mother thought she should begin school at not quite five. So my sister was tested to see if she was "ready" to start kindergarten.

    One of the questions she was given was, "Name one food that's healthy for you." And my sister chanted like a little automaton, "Wonder Bread. It builds a strong body eight ways!"

    For reference, this was in 1969...when we kids were allowed exactly one hour of TV per day. One hour, that was it. The TV went back on at 5:00 for the news for my father to watch, was off again at 5:30, and would sometimes go back on at 8:00 or so for a "grown-up show" that we kids wouldn't watch because it was boring; we would wander off to our rooms to play.

    Yes, food marketing DOES have an impact, and it's highly competitive. Obviously, both factors come into play: 1. the fact that marketing teams spend bocou bucks to find out exactly how to wiggle their way into our heads psychologically and 2. the fact that we see the results of our eating (we can't help but see them) and ultimately have to make our own decisions. And yes, more bocou dollars are spent making foods more hyperpalatable, again, because food is such a competitive industry. But obviously, in the long run, it's up to us to do without those mental, physical and emotional factors if we want to be healthy. If people weren't continuing to buy, marketers wouldn't be continuing to advise R&D and food development teams what to focus on ingredients-wise.

    It IS hard to resist foods that were specifically designed, from the ground up, to hit as many possible pleasure and reward centers as possible in an immediate-impact way. It's harder still with the absolutely obscene wealth of food, especially fast food, on every corner. But I also agree that (this is anecdotal) for me, I have much better resistance when I eat more natural than factory-concoted foods. This would seem to say, to me (remember this is just me!), that there definitely is a physical component...even if I would not personally term it addictive.

    I don't know why people go so militantly on either side of the fence with this when it's obvious both factors - outside influences, and our own personal choice - come into play. I really doubt most people get up in the morning thinking, "I'm going to be a total glutton today and get REALLY REALLY fat, hurrah!" We're pretty much all in the same boat, as I see things...and if just one answer were the easy answer, well, then nobody would be struggling.

    We just have to take each day and each food choice as it comes...IMO. The temptation IS always going to be there. Brilliant food marketing is always going to be there. These are not non-profit organizations. And our choice will, for most of us, always be there too. But in real, actual, practical life, I see far less "Hey...I'm a complete moron who has no clue about nutrition and have decided I'll just go ahead and eat myself into a coma because, hey, that's fun and who cares if I weigh 500 pounds" and far more "hey, this is a struggle and I know I'm an intelligent person, so what's the problem?" I think people see one another in a TERRIBLE light in regards to this issue. People are no less intrinsically stupid and gluttonous today than they were 100, 500, 1000 years ago collectively. Give each other a break - it is obvious science and psychology DO factor in here at least to an extent. Those are (just from what I personally have seen) what most people are fighting against...not an overall stupid "duh" head-in-the-clouds attitude and willfully ignorant bent. Just my $.02.

    Nicely said, thank you. I do tend to have a militant personality so that makes sense. Working on toning it down or redirecting where it works. Appreciate your words.
  • RGv2
    RGv2 Posts: 5,789 Member
    edited November 2014
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    You're trying to pass it as fact though. No one has said that eating healthy is bad and that it doesn't work, it's that you're trying to pass falsities that fast food is "toxic" as a fact and letting us all know how educated you are on the subject....which I guess all came from the "school of hard knocks" now.
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    J72FIT wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    J72FIT wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    roz112 wrote: »
    Firstly, i think the more junk food you eat the more your body will crave it. Granted everyone has days where they just want something super sweet, salty or just any kind of comfort food. I think with junk food its best to just cut it out cold turkey, first few weeks will be the hardest because your brain is just telling you what to crave. After a while you'll see its a lot easier to just eat generally healthier, at this point reintroduce junk food in moderation.
    I generally eat pretty healthy but i have days where i just want to eat everything in sight and then feel extremely disgusted. Ive gotten a lot better at actually enjoying the junk food i eat without feeling guilty because then i stop when im satisfied, if i dont and i just eat junk food i dont really even want i wont get satisfied so i want to eat everything.

    Please don't equate your situation and then generalize it to everyone else. I had one cookie today cause someone brought them in. Didn't crave any more. I haven't started holding up convenient stores to get my next cookie fix. Some of us are perfectly fine with moderation. Just because you don't have the willpower, don't generalize it onto everyone else.

    Wow! I did not read her post that way. Sounded like she was just sharing her experience. Take it easy pal...

    The very first line of her post..."Firstly, i think the more junk food you eat the more your body will crave it.". That is a generalization that does not apply to everyone. I wasn't being rude to the girl. Just letting her know. Not sure why you think I'm not taking it easy.

    Whatever dude...
    Bye.gif
  • J72FIT
    J72FIT Posts: 6,002 Member
    Hornsby wrote: »
    J72FIT wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    J72FIT wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    roz112 wrote: »
    Firstly, i think the more junk food you eat the more your body will crave it. Granted everyone has days where they just want something super sweet, salty or just any kind of comfort food. I think with junk food its best to just cut it out cold turkey, first few weeks will be the hardest because your brain is just telling you what to crave. After a while you'll see its a lot easier to just eat generally healthier, at this point reintroduce junk food in moderation.
    I generally eat pretty healthy but i have days where i just want to eat everything in sight and then feel extremely disgusted. Ive gotten a lot better at actually enjoying the junk food i eat without feeling guilty because then i stop when im satisfied, if i dont and i just eat junk food i dont really even want i wont get satisfied so i want to eat everything.

    Please don't equate your situation and then generalize it to everyone else. I had one cookie today cause someone brought them in. Didn't crave any more. I haven't started holding up convenient stores to get my next cookie fix. Some of us are perfectly fine with moderation. Just because you don't have the willpower, don't generalize it onto everyone else.

    Wow! I did not read her post that way. Sounded like she was just sharing her experience. Take it easy pal...

    The very first line of her post..."Firstly, i think the more junk food you eat the more your body will crave it.". That is a generalization that does not apply to everyone. I wasn't being rude to the girl. Just letting her know. Not sure why you think I'm not taking it easy.

    Whatever dude...
    Bye.gif

    Lol!
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    Hornsby wrote: »
    J72FIT wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    roz112 wrote: »
    Firstly, i think the more junk food you eat the more your body will crave it. Granted everyone has days where they just want something super sweet, salty or just any kind of comfort food. I think with junk food its best to just cut it out cold turkey, first few weeks will be the hardest because your brain is just telling you what to crave. After a while you'll see its a lot easier to just eat generally healthier, at this point reintroduce junk food in moderation.
    I generally eat pretty healthy but i have days where i just want to eat everything in sight and then feel extremely disgusted. Ive gotten a lot better at actually enjoying the junk food i eat without feeling guilty because then i stop when im satisfied, if i dont and i just eat junk food i dont really even want i wont get satisfied so i want to eat everything.

    Please don't equate your situation and then generalize it to everyone else. I had one cookie today cause someone brought them in. Didn't crave any more. I haven't started holding up convenient stores to get my next cookie fix. Some of us are perfectly fine with moderation. Just because you don't have the willpower, don't generalize it onto everyone else.

    Wow! I did not read her post that way. Sounded like she was just sharing her experience. Take it easy pal...

    The very first line of her post..."Firstly, i think the more junk food you eat the more your body will crave it.". That is a generalization that does not apply to everyone. I wasn't being rude to the girl. Just letting her know. Not sure why you think I'm not taking it easy.

    She said "I think". I took that as a personal belief. If she said "the more junk food you eat....." then I'd agree.

    A lot of what is talked about on forums is personal beliefs/opinions. There wouldn't be anything to debate if that wasn't the case.

  • JeffseekingV
    JeffseekingV Posts: 3,165 Member
    RGv2 wrote: »
    mccindy72 wrote: »
    RGv2 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    If it's all "Big Food's" fault (smh at even needing to type that), then why do some individuals who eat "clean" and exercise every day die early of cancer while others can live to triple didgets eating whatever they want, smoke, and drink?

    If you have pudding, please share, but there is no proof in it.

    I'm not agreeing with her but not all cancers are food related. Genetics and other outside variables can cause cancer regardless of how well one eats.

    Exactly this - My cancer is no way, shape or form caused by anything I did in lifestyle. Doctors have no idea what caused it. As it is one of the most underfunded forms of cancer, it's also one of the kinds that has the least known about it - and that includes causes. I'm all about eating in moderation, and I've always been a fairly "clean" eater- whatever that means. I ate a lot of fresh vegetables and fruit, high fiber, whole grains, not too much red meat, low fat, all that la-la. I exercised a lot for years, didn't smoke, drank lots of water. And I still got cancer. So yeah. Enjoy life, damnit, because you never know what's around the corner.

    That's not what I meant, I will now edit the quote.
    If it's all "Big Food's" fault (smh at even needing to type that), then why do some individuals who eat "clean" and exercise every day die early while others can live to triple didgets eating whatever they want, smoke, and drink?

    If you have pudding, please share, but there is no proof in it.

    Because some can. I don't think you can cite anomalies and then extrapolate them out to include everyone. ie.. a generalization. It's like saying if that guy at 5'9", 150lbs trains and benches 225lbs for 5 reps, why can't I if I'm the same height / weight and training programs
  • J72FIT
    J72FIT Posts: 6,002 Member
    RGv2 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    You're trying to pass it as fact though. No one has said that eating healthy is bad and that it doesn't work, it's that you're trying to pass falsities that fast food is "toxic" as a fact and letting us all know how educated you are on the subject....which I guess all came from the "school of hard knocks" now.

    Right... it's just bad logic.

    Statement 1: Eating cake can lead to obesity. Statement 2: Obesity can lead to diabetes. False Assumption: Eating cake leads to diabetes...
  • LAWoman72
    LAWoman72 Posts: 2,846 Member
    edited November 2014
    mccindy72 wrote: »


    She was five. That's what parents are for. If adults can't overcome a marketing campaign when buying food..... time for the kool-aid for the masses.

    And they did. In our household, we ate "three square meals" a day, NO snacks after age five (we had "snack time" in kindergarten), those snacks were generally a piece of fruit - never Twinkies or chips (those items weren't even kept in our house), and we were refused dessert - which was small; say, two cookies, or a small pudding - if we had not eaten a dinner plate that contained a protein, a veggie and "a starch," then called a "square meal."

    Sure my parents fought against it.

    But the marketing was there - and even way back then, was bright enough to manage to 'get in there" with just seconds of exposure per day (based on my family's TV habits, anyway). That was my point. Today? We're bombarded.

    If a little child, who was brighter than any of her peers, and who was protected FROM advertising to very strict levels, "caught" the marketing bug in that way, then obviously, marketing from my own ANECDOTAL experience tells me (remember this is just me) that sure, we can all fall victims to marketing getting "in there" (though not to HAVING to make those choices, obviously...that IS up to us) - it is very, very, very psychological...and very, very, very carefully crafted, and continuously updated, in highly specific and researched ways. This only makes sense - we're talking about business here.

    Please note that I said before, and continue to say, that this does not mean we're all just a bunch of victims or mindless automatons...the bottom line is that *we do have to make our own choices*...that is it. There is no way around that.

    I was more sharing a story that points, *in my view*, to how marketing can affect even those who are protected from it to a huge extent...actually that was the whole point of my big-sister-as-a-child anecdote. ;) It was more of a call for understanding rather than automatic indictment of "the next person" (how is it that on the internet, everyone is the "smart person" with "the masses" ALL being dummies - let's think about that logically, it's just not possible ;) )? I am by no means saying, "poor us...and there's nothing we can do about it." Obviously, there is. Again obviously, it's up to us - individually - to decide with each and every meal, what to put into our bodies.

  • GenesiaElizabeth
    GenesiaElizabeth Posts: 227 Member
    edited November 2014
    RGv2 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    You're trying to pass it as fact though. No one has said that eating healthy is bad and that it doesn't work, it's that you're trying to pass falsities that fast food is "toxic" as a fact.

    If it's not toxic, then what do you say it is? Because to me, I've watched people (myself and husband included) get very sick and unproductive to society when they eat this food on a regular basis. I've also watched how mostly abstaining from it can heal you in many ways.

    The OP asked how to combat the cravings for junk food and asked why it makes him feel the way he does. I simply answered his question. He can take the idea of giving up junk food and watch how his health immaculately improves or he can not. Same to all of you. I'm not overreacting, name calling or bashing on anyone else because they are defending mc Donalds and kfc and stating that they cured heart disease by eating junk, while I believe, being serious.
  • JeffseekingV
    JeffseekingV Posts: 3,165 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    I think that you are living proof of exercising, changing your diet to more healthy foods and watching your calorie counts works. Obviously!

    But I wouldn't take that as proof that what that lady's blog is stating is true.
  • GenesiaElizabeth
    GenesiaElizabeth Posts: 227 Member
    edited November 2014
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    I think that you are living proof of exercising, changing your diet to more healthy foods and watching your calorie counts works. Obviously!

    But I wouldn't take that as proof that what that lady's blog is stating is true.

    I'm not, don't worry. :wink: Again, I really don't care about her controversies. Someone else brought her up, not I. There's more that meets the eye with me here. My improvements have not just been physical or simply "feeling better". I may be in the wrong place for welcome but nonetheless, I wanted to respond to the OP.
  • JeffseekingV
    JeffseekingV Posts: 3,165 Member
    edited November 2014
    Ah.... I see. but the "food is toxic" thing I honestly have a problem with. Again, your success doesn't mean most foods in the store are toxic. It's your switch to a more healthy diet that led to your success.
  • mccindy72
    mccindy72 Posts: 7,001 Member
    RGv2 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    You're trying to pass it as fact though. No one has said that eating healthy is bad and that it doesn't work, it's that you're trying to pass falsities that fast food is "toxic" as a fact.

    If it's not toxic, then what do you say it is? Because to me, I've watched people (myself and husband included) get very sick and unproductive to society when they eat this food on a regular basis. I've also watched how mostly abstaining from it can heal you in many ways.

    The OP asked how to combat the cravings for junk food and asked why it makes him feel the way he does. I simply answered his question. He can take the idea of giving up junk food and watch how his health immaculately improves or he can not. Same to all of you. I'm not overreacting, name calling or bashing on anyone else because they are defending mc Donalds and kfc and stating that they cured heart disease by eating junk, while I believe, being serious.

    Why does it have to be black and white? You speak in absolutes and that's not necessary. He doesn't have to give it up. He could learn to eat some, now and then, instead. Having it once in a while is fine, and he'll find he's not unhealthy that way. Many people are plenty healthy eating fast food once in a while, and eating a regular diet at home.
  • I_Will_End_You
    I_Will_End_You Posts: 4,397 Member
    RGv2 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    You're trying to pass it as fact though. No one has said that eating healthy is bad and that it doesn't work, it's that you're trying to pass falsities that fast food is "toxic" as a fact.

    If it's not toxic, then what do you say it is? Because to me, I've watched people (myself and husband included) get very sick and unproductive to society when they eat this food on a regular basis. I've also watched how mostly abstaining from it can heal you in many ways.

    .

    It's food, that's what it is. How to apply your opinion on "toxic" fast food to all of the people who eat it and don't get sick or unproductive to society? I have two brothers (late 20s and early 30s) who eat fast food every day and are both fit, healthy and more active than anyone I know. Why don't the toxins affect them?
  • GenesiaElizabeth
    GenesiaElizabeth Posts: 227 Member
    edited November 2014
    mccindy72 wrote: »
    RGv2 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    You're trying to pass it as fact though. No one has said that eating healthy is bad and that it doesn't work, it's that you're trying to pass falsities that fast food is "toxic" as a fact.

    If it's not toxic, then what do you say it is? Because to me, I've watched people (myself and husband included) get very sick and unproductive to society when they eat this food on a regular basis. I've also watched how mostly abstaining from it can heal you in many ways.

    The OP asked how to combat the cravings for junk food and asked why it makes him feel the way he does. I simply answered his question. He can take the idea of giving up junk food and watch how his health immaculately improves or he can not. Same to all of you. I'm not overreacting, name calling or bashing on anyone else because they are defending mc Donalds and kfc and stating that they cured heart disease by eating junk, while I believe, being serious.

    Why does it have to be black and white? You speak in absolutes and that's not necessary. He doesn't have to give it up. He could learn to eat some, now and then, instead. Having it once in a while is fine, and he'll find he's not unhealthy that way. Many people are plenty healthy eating fast food once in a while, and eating a regular diet at home.

    Thank you. I can accept this and try to better communicate my thoughts and experiences. We also, but very rarely, indulge reasonally.
  • adamitri
    adamitri Posts: 614 Member
    RGv2 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    You're trying to pass it as fact though. No one has said that eating healthy is bad and that it doesn't work, it's that you're trying to pass falsities that fast food is "toxic" as a fact.

    If it's not toxic, then what do you say it is? Because to me, I've watched people (myself and husband included) get very sick and unproductive to society when they eat this food on a regular basis. I've also watched how mostly abstaining from it can heal you in many ways.

    .

    It's food, that's what it is. How to apply your opinion on "toxic" fast food to all of the people who eat it and don't get sick or unproductive to society? I have two brothers (late 20s and early 30s) who eat fast food every day and are both fit, healthy and more active than anyone I know. Why don't the toxins affect them?

    Obviously they're still too young to see the results. We must wait years upon years before those sneaky toxins kill us.

    /s
  • This content has been removed.
  • WinoGelato
    WinoGelato Posts: 13,454 Member
    I'm interested in how you became unproductive to society by eating fast food? I mean, you were paying for the food, right? So you were at least contributing to the economy.... that's not completely unproductive to society.
  • GenesiaElizabeth
    GenesiaElizabeth Posts: 227 Member
    RGv2 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    You're trying to pass it as fact though. No one has said that eating healthy is bad and that it doesn't work, it's that you're trying to pass falsities that fast food is "toxic" as a fact.

    If it's not toxic, then what do you say it is? Because to me, I've watched people (myself and husband included) get very sick and unproductive to society when they eat this food on a regular basis. I've also watched how mostly abstaining from it can heal you in many ways.

    .

    It's food, that's what it is. How to apply your opinion on "toxic" fast food to all of the people who eat it and don't get sick or unproductive to society? I have two brothers (late 20s and early 30s) who eat fast food every day and are both fit, healthy and more active than anyone I know. Why don't the toxins affect them?

    Exactly, they are in 20s and 30s. Give it 10 years, maybe sooner. :disappointed:
  • LAWoman72
    LAWoman72 Posts: 2,846 Member
    edited November 2014


    It's food, that's what it is. How to apply your opinion on "toxic" fast food to all of the people who eat it and don't get sick or unproductive to society? I have two brothers (late 20s and early 30s) who eat fast food every day and are both fit, healthy and more active than anyone I know. Why don't the toxins affect them?

    Hmmm....

    I personally don't apply "toxic" to an intake item unless it actually is toxic...but I don't think there's much doubt that people's bodies process items very individually.

    Why don't "the toxins" (again, I personally do not personally apply that label, but you were responding to someone else who did) affect your brothers? Maybe because their bodies are their own and process things in unique ways?

    I don't know, why can other people eat loads of carbs at a sitting and not fly into a binge tailspin, but I do? I guess because I drew that short straw. It is what it is.

    I don't believe "if X were true, then it would be true for EVERYBODY" can apply to...well, anything. I mean that's like saying "If cigarettes caused cancer, everybody who smoked would get cancer." (And no, before anyone goes leaping for that, ;) I am NOT saying sugar is as harmful as cigarettes.)

    We're individuals. And we have to work within the framework of what we've been given and do what works for us...IMO.

  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,988 Member
    RGv2 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    You're trying to pass it as fact though. No one has said that eating healthy is bad and that it doesn't work, it's that you're trying to pass falsities that fast food is "toxic" as a fact.

    If it's not toxic, then what do you say it is? Because to me, I've watched people (myself and husband included) get very sick and unproductive to society when they eat this food on a regular basis. I've also watched how mostly abstaining from it can heal you in many ways.

    The OP asked how to combat the cravings for junk food and asked why it makes him feel the way he does. I simply answered his question. He can take the idea of giving up junk food and watch how his health immaculately improves or he can not. Same to all of you. I'm not overreacting, name calling or bashing on anyone else because they are defending mc Donalds and kfc and stating that they cured heart disease by eating junk, while I believe, being serious.
    Eating drinking TOO MUCH of anything can lead to "toxicity" in the body. It's not that the chemicals in food themselves are "toxic". That's why detoxing and cleansing aren't real science because it's just not how the body work.
    Drinking too much water in a short period of time can lead to toxicity. Same with consuming too much vitamin A. Or high dosing on NSAIDS. These chemicals aren't "toxic" but can become toxic in the body if dosage is high enough.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png
  • J72FIT
    J72FIT Posts: 6,002 Member
    RGv2 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    You're trying to pass it as fact though. No one has said that eating healthy is bad and that it doesn't work, it's that you're trying to pass falsities that fast food is "toxic" as a fact.

    If it's not toxic, then what do you say it is? Because to me, I've watched people (myself and husband included) get very sick and unproductive to society when they eat this food on a regular basis. I've also watched how mostly abstaining from it can heal you in many ways.

    The OP asked how to combat the cravings for junk food and asked why it makes him feel the way he does. I simply answered his question. He can take the idea of giving up junk food and watch how his health immaculately improves or he can not. Same to all of you. I'm not overreacting, name calling or bashing on anyone else because they are defending mc Donalds and kfc and stating that they cured heart disease by eating junk, while I believe, being serious.

    You seem to be ignoring something you said earlier and I will quote it again...

    "Sure you can do it in moderation, if you are healthy all around - Good self control, discipline and no current, serious health conditions."

    So I say again, it really is not about the food then...
  • GenesiaElizabeth
    GenesiaElizabeth Posts: 227 Member
    RGv2 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    You're trying to pass it as fact though. No one has said that eating healthy is bad and that it doesn't work, it's that you're trying to pass falsities that fast food is "toxic" as a fact.

    If it's not toxic, then what do you say it is? Because to me, I've watched people (myself and husband included) get very sick and unproductive to society when they eat this food on a regular basis. I've also watched how mostly abstaining from it can heal you in many ways.

    .

    It's food, that's what it is. How to apply your opinion on "toxic" fast food to all of the people who eat it and don't get sick or unproductive to society? I have two brothers (late 20s and early 30s) who eat fast food every day and are both fit, healthy and more active than anyone I know. Why don't the toxins affect them?

    Exactly, they are in 20s and 30s. Give it 10 years, maybe sooner. :disappointed:

    Why risk it? As much as I need to read, you need to also. About what it does in fact do to people on the inside of their body, which will show up on the outside eventually. How soon depends on many factors.
  • I_Will_End_You
    I_Will_End_You Posts: 4,397 Member
    RGv2 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    You're trying to pass it as fact though. No one has said that eating healthy is bad and that it doesn't work, it's that you're trying to pass falsities that fast food is "toxic" as a fact.

    If it's not toxic, then what do you say it is? Because to me, I've watched people (myself and husband included) get very sick and unproductive to society when they eat this food on a regular basis. I've also watched how mostly abstaining from it can heal you in many ways.

    .

    It's food, that's what it is. How to apply your opinion on "toxic" fast food to all of the people who eat it and don't get sick or unproductive to society? I have two brothers (late 20s and early 30s) who eat fast food every day and are both fit, healthy and more active than anyone I know. Why don't the toxins affect them?

    Exactly, they are in 20s and 30s. Give it 10 years, maybe sooner. :disappointed:

    Which toxins in fast food, specifically, will hurt them and how? And why do they only affect people of certain ages?
  • J72FIT
    J72FIT Posts: 6,002 Member
    RGv2 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    adowe wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    parkscs wrote: »
    Sometimes, it's not all about what you can see. Being buff, skinny, fit, obese, chubby doesn't matter. It's about what's happening on the inside of your body that you can't see. Hubby was 140lbs and 5'7" when he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 10 years ago. Who knew! Kids are going into emergency rooms getting diagnosed with type 2 but look otherwise perfectly healthy!

    Good luck in your ventures, guys! I wish you all the best and I hope the OP will have a chance to read what has been said and try it for himself, if he is truly seeking understanding and health improvement. :):heart:

    That's called *kitten* happens. One of the healthiest guys I've known in my life was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer. He was an avid cyclist, big into local produce and health before it became "cool" to buy organic, never smoked, never drank, and yet he died around the age of 50. No matter what you eat or don't eat, there are no guarantees in life. The best you can do is enjoy yourself and try to minimize your risk of illness.

    But you're delusional if you think you'll be immune from cancer, diabetes and the like just because you avoid processed foods and gluten. Then again though, some people need to delude themselves because the reality is a bit too harsh, so maybe that's not a bad thing.

    People judge but don't want to be judged..

    I did not say I think this will make us immune from cancer and disease but what I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases, if you refrain from junk food and feed your body what it should have.

    If you knew me personally, you would know that I have had my fair share and then some of loss and reality. Those who can see my heart (thank you for the messages) are what keeps me going. It's not discouraging at all to receive such backlash, it empowers me to go out and learn more in hopes that one day, the world might be a healthier and happier place for us.

    For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    Ok, now I'm really done, lol. Have a good day!!


    While wikipedia is not the best source to cite, no-one has said that macronutrients are all that matter.

    Going to post one of my favorite quotes - from an actual

    "Once our nutrient needs are met, we don’t get extra credit for eating more nutritious food! - Eric Helms"


    There are very few foods that actively are bad for you, medical conditions aside, and in reasonable doses.

    Also, please do go out and learn more.

    From what I get from her post is that macronutrients isn't everything. There is a very good case to be made from micronutrient dense food intake. Not from a weight/calorie count standpoint but from a health standpoint. If your statement above includes both macro and micro, you two are agreeing more than disagreeing.


    My point was, no-one said it was. I am not agreeing with her at all however on most of her points. She seems to think that non-nutrient foods are toxic or something. They are not. She also seems to think that fast food has no nutrients at all - which is ludicrous.

    I only read her last quote that seems to summarize her point.

    1) I did say is that it can and likely will improve your overall quality of life and even reverse certain diseases

    You agree or disagree?

    2) For those who think macronutrients (fat, carbs, protein) are all that matters, have a read about what a nutrient actually is and how it's more than that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient

    You agree or disagree?

    I didn't read the wiki but I tend to agree with both of her statements. In a general sense.

    I'm not sure if she is saying junk foods are toxic or not vs them being very micronutrient lacking. And there is probably a bunch of ingredients in various junk foods that aren't particularly great for you but that is merely my opinion. And I'll quantify that by stating that the amount of junk food intake would have to be pretty high and often to make a difference.


    Try reading the rest of her posts, then get back to us!

    OK, offer me some grace please, lol... I'm working on how to best articulate my thoughts and views. But I will say that I do believe that most of what is available to us to eat is harmful to our bodies because a) the presence of chemicals and ingredients they contain, we were not made to consume and b) the absence of nutrients that heal and protect (immune system) us leave our guards down. It will do the best job it can with what it's given but sooner or later, it does catch up with you and the results are usually not good.

    Maybe my approach was wrong at first but all I'm ultimately after is to offer hope to those who are struggling with these types of foods. There is another way and it's so worth it.. To have been able to say that you lived a life to it's fullest potential and in the process of doing so, you taught your children how to have the same.

    I really do mean well. I promise.

    Well whatever you did appeared to have worked for you. Looking at your profile it appears to be reasonable. But maybe you need to further educate yourself on your sources. Some of them come across pretty controversial. Stating that food is "bad" doesn't go over well here. IMHO, there's never been a time where we had such nutrient dense foods available to us and at the same time had so much nutrient deficient foods available to us. There's never been a time where us as individuals have required to be educated about what we eat. It's up us and not anyone else to know what we eat. Or if we choose to eat, know the "why".

    Then why are so many people sick, obese, dying, not knowing where to turn? If we are free indeed to make our own choices, perhaps it does have something to do with manipulation and addiction from the manufacturers to consumers because why aren't we choosing better quality and fresher foods then? Based on statistics, we are more unhealthy as a culture than we are healthy and thriving.

    Not to you specifically but I think we really need to be open to people trying to make a better world by offering ideas, information and personal experience that has worked for them in many ways. Sometimes, we need to look beyond the scientic reasoning and explaining and just embrace the fact that fresh fruits and veggies are far more helpful to us vs harmful, like 90% of what's in a typical grocery store. The proof is in the pudding.

    And thank you the compliment on my weight loss, as that's how I'm taking it. :smile:

    It is so clear that you have watched a great deal of fear mongering documentaries. The issue with that is if you believe them then try to push it on to others, you can't back up what you hear in the show with regurgitated information from the show. You actually have to provide the facts. Research what they say for yourself. They throw out random numbers which is exactly what you are doing.

    I am living proof that this works. I don't need a degree or a list of facts to be confident in sharing what has worked for me and what has also been tragic in my life regarding what you eat, including many people that I know. Next time I will start with my story rather than try to skip it. My apologies for coming off too strong at first, without including my personal details.

    Ever hear of hard knocks? That's where I got my degree and facts but I certainly will not get into that here.

    You're trying to pass it as fact though. No one has said that eating healthy is bad and that it doesn't work, it's that you're trying to pass falsities that fast food is "toxic" as a fact.

    If it's not toxic, then what do you say it is? Because to me, I've watched people (myself and husband included) get very sick and unproductive to society when they eat this food on a regular basis. I've also watched how mostly abstaining from it can heal you in many ways.

    .

    It's food, that's what it is. How to apply your opinion on "toxic" fast food to all of the people who eat it and don't get sick or unproductive to society? I have two brothers (late 20s and early 30s) who eat fast food every day and are both fit, healthy and more active than anyone I know. Why don't the toxins affect them?

    Exactly, they are in 20s and 30s. Give it 10 years, maybe sooner. :disappointed:

    Why risk it? As much as I need to read, you need to also. About what it does in fact do to people on the inside of their body, which will show up on the outside eventually. How soon depends on many factors.

    So go to the doctor once a year and have a check-up... problem solved. See... there is no boogeyman...

  • ithrowconfetti
    ithrowconfetti Posts: 451 Member
    I thought this was a thread for the Prader-Willi Syndrome. Guess it's my own fault for taking the terms "eating trash" in the title literally and being misled. Oh, folly! Carry on with the intellectual debate!
  • J72FIT
    J72FIT Posts: 6,002 Member
    If it's not toxic, then what do you say it is?

    I say it's just food...
  • sweetpea03b
    sweetpea03b Posts: 1,123 Member
    Because it tastes SOOO good going down! I find the best thing that works for me is to not have it around. If its not in the house, I can't eat it. I get the snack sized candy bars so I can have a small helping without the temptation of the full sized candy bar that I know I will eat in 1 sitting. I get 100 calorie popsicles instead of tubs of ice cream. I get the snack sized bags of chips (if any) so I don't go through a whole bag. Getting the pre-measured portions is more expensive... but it helps me fight my demons. Let yourself have it... or you'll binge later... but you have to know what your triggers are and make changes to your lifestyle that works for you. For me, this works. Good luck!
This discussion has been closed.