i'm eating more but still losing weight

178101213

Replies

  • This content has been removed.
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member
    I'm betting Sara posts in here again. For science.
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Still waiting for the answer as to how food has zero nutritional value.

    As well as seeing support for the statement "Soda is linked to prostate, processed meats to heart disease, diet soda to obesity and a whole slew of problems"

    And that bb'ers all eat clean

    And that "fast food' is going to leave you riddled with cancer and disease

    And that broccoli is more beneficial than a "damn brownie" in every situation

    And what is toxic 'food' - and how is it toxic

    Also would love to know why its better to consume pesticides than eat junk all the time.

    As well as the repeated question as who is suggesting to eat 'junk food' all the time.



    Still waiting for answers to these, but I am expected to support an assertion I did not even make...


    Wow....
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    I'm betting Sara posts in here again. For science.

    AHAHAHA
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    Didn't you call me a troll?
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Crap...

    You stated that these foods I speak of aren't toxic, fear mongering to call them bad for your health, presented you with articles which I'm sure aren't just pulled out of the air, stating the health risks involved with consuming those foods, call me names, and yet you can't provide one shred of evidence to defend your claim that nothing is wrong with consuming these foods. That even makes me wonder if that is actually you in that photo or someone from another website based on peer evaluation?

    I asked you to explain what is toxic about them.

    You made the assertion - you back it up. Nice try to deflect your asbolute failure to support any of your claims but its pretty transparent.

    I already addressed those articles.

    Where did I call you names?

    LMFAO at the photo comment....especially considering...


    ahahahahahha

    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Crap...

    You stated that these foods I speak of aren't toxic, fear mongering to call them bad for your health, presented you with articles which I'm sure aren't just pulled out of the air, stating the health risks involved with consuming those foods, call me names, and yet you can't provide one shred of evidence to defend your claim that nothing is wrong with consuming these foods. That even makes me wonder if that is actually you in that photo or someone from another website based on peer evaluation?

    I asked you to explain what is toxic about them.

    You made the assertion - you back it up. Nice try to deflect your asbolute failure to support any of your claims but its pretty transparent.

    I already addressed those articles.

    Where did I call you names?

    LMFAO at the photo comment....especially considering...


    ahahahahahha


    Didn't you call me a troll? I'm sure that's not a compliment?

    Still waiting for your source?

    For what?
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member
    My in box is ready.
  • Liftng4Lis
    Liftng4Lis Posts: 15,151 Member
    I'm betting Sara posts in here again. For science.

    I'm just hanging out waiting for SS.
  • deviboy1592
    deviboy1592 Posts: 989 Member
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Still waiting for the answer as to how food has zero nutritional value.

    As well as seeing support for the statement "Soda is linked to prostate, processed meats to heart disease, diet soda to obesity and a whole slew of problems"

    And that bb'ers all eat clean

    And that "fast food' is going to leave you riddled with cancer and disease

    And that broccoli is more beneficial than a "damn brownie" in every situation

    And what is toxic 'food' - and how is it toxic

    Also would love to know why its better to consume pesticides than eat junk all the time.

    As well as the repeated question as who is suggesting to eat 'junk food' all the time.



    Still waiting for answers to these, but I am expected to support an assertion I did not even make...


    Wow....

    Really? How is a brownie more beneficial than broccoli? Explain that to me?
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member
    Liftng4Lis wrote: »
    I'm betting Sara posts in here again. For science.

    I'm just hanging out waiting for SS.

    You think he's gonna share?
  • deviboy1592
    deviboy1592 Posts: 989 Member
    When bbers are in competition, what foods do they? Just wondering? Do they eat junk food whenever they want?
  • Liftng4Lis
    Liftng4Lis Posts: 15,151 Member
    Liftng4Lis wrote: »
    I'm betting Sara posts in here again. For science.

    I'm just hanging out waiting for SS.

    You think he's gonna share?

    I was kinda hoping!
  • LolBroScience
    LolBroScience Posts: 4,537 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    ok...I am out, this is ridiculous. I now owe SideSteel noodz as he won the bet!!

    Brb....texting SideSteel

    Can you pass them my way too bro?
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Still waiting for the answer as to how food has zero nutritional value.

    As well as seeing support for the statement "Soda is linked to prostate, processed meats to heart disease, diet soda to obesity and a whole slew of problems"

    And that bb'ers all eat clean

    And that "fast food' is going to leave you riddled with cancer and disease

    And that broccoli is more beneficial than a "damn brownie" in every situation

    And what is toxic 'food' - and how is it toxic

    Also would love to know why its better to consume pesticides than eat junk all the time.

    As well as the repeated question as who is suggesting to eat 'junk food' all the time.



    Still waiting for answers to these, but I am expected to support an assertion I did not even make...


    Wow....

    Really? How is a brownie more beneficial than broccoli? Explain that to me?

    When I have had a lot of fiber already in the day, and full, am about to lift and have hit my micros, need a bit more fats to hit my macros is only one of many many situations when it would be.

    Also....sill waiting.
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Still waiting for the answer as to how food has zero nutritional value.

    As well as seeing support for the statement "Soda is linked to prostate, processed meats to heart disease, diet soda to obesity and a whole slew of problems"

    And that bb'ers all eat clean

    And that "fast food' is going to leave you riddled with cancer and disease

    And that broccoli is more beneficial than a "damn brownie" in every situation

    And what is toxic 'food' - and how is it toxic

    Also would love to know why its better to consume pesticides than eat junk all the time.

    As well as the repeated question as who is suggesting to eat 'junk food' all the time.



    Still waiting for answers to these, but I am expected to support an assertion I did not even make...


    Wow....

    Really? How is a brownie more beneficial than broccoli? Explain that to me?

    If you are looking for fats, pleasure, or bulking. A brownie beats broccoli. Or even quick energy as a cyclist.
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    Liftng4Lis wrote: »
    I'm betting Sara posts in here again. For science.

    I'm just hanging out waiting for SS.

    He has been in but is too sensible to come back to this ridiculousness I think
  • LolBroScience
    LolBroScience Posts: 4,537 Member
    When bbers are in competition, what foods do they? Just wondering? Do they eat junk food whenever they want?

    Do you know any?
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    ok...I am out, this is ridiculous. I now owe SideSteel noodz as he won the bet!!

    Brb....texting SideSteel

    Can you pass them my way too bro?

    Haven't you heard though....my profile pic apparently isn't even me.
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Still waiting for the answer as to how food has zero nutritional value.

    As well as seeing support for the statement "Soda is linked to prostate, processed meats to heart disease, diet soda to obesity and a whole slew of problems"

    And that bb'ers all eat clean

    And that "fast food' is going to leave you riddled with cancer and disease

    And that broccoli is more beneficial than a "damn brownie" in every situation

    And what is toxic 'food' - and how is it toxic

    Also would love to know why its better to consume pesticides than eat junk all the time.

    As well as the repeated question as who is suggesting to eat 'junk food' all the time.



    Still waiting for answers to these, but I am expected to support an assertion I did not even make...


    Wow....

    Really? How is a brownie more beneficial than broccoli? Explain that to me?

    If you are looking for fats, pleasure, or bulking. A brownie beats broccoli. Or even quick energy as a cyclist.

    Context...apparently its a hard concept.
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    ok...I am out, this is ridiculous. I now owe SideSteel noodz as he won the bet!!

    Brb....texting SideSteel

    Can you pass them my way too bro?

    Haven't you heard though....my profile pic apparently isn't even me.

    Well, can you share the pictures of not you. It should be an easier mental process.
  • This content has been removed.
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member
    edited January 2015
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    Still waiting for the answer as to how food has zero nutritional value.

    As well as seeing support for the statement "Soda is linked to prostate, processed meats to heart disease, diet soda to obesity and a whole slew of problems"

    And that bb'ers all eat clean

    And that "fast food' is going to leave you riddled with cancer and disease

    And that broccoli is more beneficial than a "damn brownie" in every situation

    And what is toxic 'food' - and how is it toxic

    Also would love to know why its better to consume pesticides than eat junk all the time.

    As well as the repeated question as who is suggesting to eat 'junk food' all the time.



    Still waiting for answers to these, but I am expected to support an assertion I did not even make...


    Wow....

    Really? How is a brownie more beneficial than broccoli? Explain that to me?

    If you are looking for fats, pleasure, or bulking. A brownie beats broccoli. Or even quick energy as a cyclist.

    Context...apparently its a hard concept.

    Clearly.
    I'm ordering in a restaurant. Looking for a nice dessert. Oh, look some broccoli would go so well with this nice demi-sec white.
  • deviboy1592
    deviboy1592 Posts: 989 Member
    edited January 2015
    Yes, most of them everyday eat chicken and potatoes everyday which I don't think is all that great for a good diet. One guy is all natural, 210 pounds but he eats very well, mostly fruits veggies and lean meats, he tries his best to stay away from sugars, sodium and gluten, ( hence where i started getting this thought process) he won first place in all natural but he placed 20 th in the open circuit.
  • ForecasterJason
    ForecasterJason Posts: 2,577 Member
    edited January 2015
    Nvm…
  • NickDuffy
    NickDuffy Posts: 4 Member
    The amount of "bro science" here is actually unbelievable, no wonder half of you dont achieve near your optimal progression.
  • ForecasterJason
    ForecasterJason Posts: 2,577 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    Here's another thing with how you guys say I view food in relation to my attempt at bulking. I admitted in the "sweets when bulking" thread that I could stand to increase my intake of vegetables. Meanwhile, there's only but so much more room I have in my appetite to add a lot more food. I can't add a lot more non starchy vegetables (already eat plenty of potatoes) and food I consider to be "unhealthy" to my diet without feeling very full. Most liquid calorie options are out (milk - digestive issues, juice - already enough fruit in my diet, protein shakes -- would have to be lactose free and even then I think I'm getting enough protein). See the problem?

    This thread is not about you. Go make your own thread.
    Will do, and will rant away there.

  • disneygallagirl
    disneygallagirl Posts: 515 Member
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    Sarauk2sf wrote: »
    ok...I am out, this is ridiculous. I now owe SideSteel noodz as he won the bet!!

    Brb....texting SideSteel

    Can you pass them my way too bro?

    Haven't you heard though....my profile pic apparently isn't even me.

    Well, can you share the pictures of not you. It should be an easier mental process.

    Lolz

  • ElizabethMaryam
    ElizabethMaryam Posts: 159 Member
    edited January 2015
    OP, if you're still following the replies, if you continue to lose weight, even while upping your calories, please mention it to your dr. That was one of the signs that led my drs to test me for hyperthyroidism. It can be serious, so please let your dr know if your weight loss continues, as it could be an indicator of a health issues which needs to be addressed. Hope you start gaining :)
  • ElizabethMaryam
    ElizabethMaryam Posts: 159 Member
    edited January 2015
    *edited original comment
  • J72FIT
    J72FIT Posts: 6,002 Member
    but that doesn't mean you need to eat all just junk food to get your calories.

    Not sure anyone actually believes this anyway...
  • J72FIT
    J72FIT Posts: 6,002 Member
    It's funny to see how people get defensive, I'm just merely saying eat food that's good for you, broccoli is better than a damn brownie, energy vs trams fat, macro, micro who cares, I look at sodium, sugar, gluten and gmos, that's all I ate for 35 years, never seen any gains, so why bother, why eat toxic food just to gain a pound of fat then try to burn it off, it sounds like every diet fad out there.

    Clearly you have no understanding of human physiology...
This discussion has been closed.