Is there such thing as good and bad calories?

Options
1356789

Replies

  • Ang108
    Ang108 Posts: 1,711 Member
    Options
    rsm193 wrote: »
    Is there a difference between good and bad calories or are calories just calories...like is it ok to eat fried food from home made in the deep fryer? Are those considered bad calories?


    It depends what your goal is. If it is weight loss than it makes no difference, because you mostly watch how much you eat. If it is health then you need to watch what you eat and the mode of preparation plays a big role.
    I eat for weight loss and health and go for a balance of the two. While I never eat anything deep fried, I have other foods I enjoy that I eat in moderation considering the amount of calories for weight loss as well as the food itself and it's preparation for health.
    For example: I like to eat a decent size piece of fish. I have started to bake it instead of breading and frying it and use the calories I save from the breading and oil to get a bigger piece of fish.
    There are no good or bad calories, because they are nothing but a measure of energy. But what you do with those calories often makes a difference.
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    Options
    laurielima wrote: »
    Wow did you ever ask a loaded question for this site..no good or bad references on this site...so jump in and eat that deep fried twinkee wrapped in bacon. good luck to you.

    straw-man.jpg


  • urloved33
    urloved33 Posts: 3,325 Member
    Options
    rsm193 wrote: »
    Is there a difference between good and bad calories or are calories just calories...like is it ok to eat fried food from home made in the deep fryer? Are those considered bad calories?

    I did not mean to be so abrupt but asking if cals are good or bad starts a big rukus on this site. in my opinion...there are bad cals in the food world. I do eat them but I know they are bad and I adjust ALL of my eating to support the fact that I am eating bad calories.

    other people want to call it healthy cals v unhealthy cals or empty cals v nutritious cals.

    Its just splitting hairs. IMO

  • Amanda4change
    Amanda4change Posts: 620 Member
    Options
    In my humble opinion:
    A calorie is a unit of measurement therefore it's neither bad nor good. However if you are wanting to lose weight any calorie in excess of your calorie limit is bad for your goal of weight loss. And calories below your calorie goal are good for your overall goal of weight loss.

    For food type specifically there are no bad or good foods overall. However there are many foods that have higher calories that will not meet all of your nutritional needs, and can take up room in your daily calorie budget that makes meeting all of your nutritional needs difficult if not impossible. Therefore I don't think there are good or bad foods per say, but foods that can be bad in meeting your overall nutritional needs
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,576 Member
    Options
    MrM27 wrote: »
    laurielima wrote: »
    rsm193 wrote: »
    Is there a difference between good and bad calories or are calories just calories...like is it ok to eat fried food from home made in the deep fryer? Are those considered bad calories?

    I did not mean to be so abrupt but asking if cals are good or bad starts a big rukus on this site. in my opinion...there are bad cals in the food world. I do eat them but I know they are bad and I adjust ALL of my eating to support the fact that I am eating bad calories.

    other people want to call it healthy cals v unhealthy cals or empty cals v nutritious cals.

    Its just splitting hairs. IMO

    What makes specific calorie bad?

    When it's more than you need.
  • EvanKeel
    EvanKeel Posts: 1,904 Member
    Options
    MrM27 wrote: »
    laurielima wrote: »
    rsm193 wrote: »
    Is there a difference between good and bad calories or are calories just calories...like is it ok to eat fried food from home made in the deep fryer? Are those considered bad calories?

    I did not mean to be so abrupt but asking if cals are good or bad starts a big rukus on this site. in my opinion...there are bad cals in the food world. I do eat them but I know they are bad and I adjust ALL of my eating to support the fact that I am eating bad calories.

    other people want to call it healthy cals v unhealthy cals or empty cals v nutritious cals.

    Its just splitting hairs. IMO

    What makes specific calorie bad?

    When it's more than you need.

    If the calorie is more than you need, it's no better or worse because of the eating. It just is what it is either way. The act of eating the excess calorie may lead to a undesired effect. To me it's an important distinction.
  • sgthaggard
    sgthaggard Posts: 581 Member
    Options
    MrM27 wrote: »
    laurielima wrote: »
    rsm193 wrote: »
    Is there a difference between good and bad calories or are calories just calories...like is it ok to eat fried food from home made in the deep fryer? Are those considered bad calories?

    I did not mean to be so abrupt but asking if cals are good or bad starts a big rukus on this site. in my opinion...there are bad cals in the food world. I do eat them but I know they are bad and I adjust ALL of my eating to support the fact that I am eating bad calories.

    other people want to call it healthy cals v unhealthy cals or empty cals v nutritious cals.

    Its just splitting hairs. IMO

    What makes specific calorie bad?
    I'd like to hear an answer to this. A calorie is a way of measuring energy. Saying that there are good and bad calories is like saying there are good and bad inches.

  • urloved33
    urloved33 Posts: 3,325 Member
    Options
    EvanKeel wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    laurielima wrote: »
    rsm193 wrote: »
    Is there a difference between good and bad calories or are calories just calories...like is it ok to eat fried food from home made in the deep fryer? Are those considered bad calories?

    I did not mean to be so abrupt but asking if cals are good or bad starts a big rukus on this site. in my opinion...there are bad cals in the food world. I do eat them but I know they are bad and I adjust ALL of my eating to support the fact that I am eating bad calories.

    other people want to call it healthy cals v unhealthy cals or empty cals v nutritious cals.

    Its just splitting hairs. IMO

    What makes specific calorie bad?

    When it's more than you need.

    If the calorie is more than you need, it's no better or worse because of the eating. It just is what it is either way. The act of eating the excess calorie may lead to a undesired effect. To me it's an important distinction.

    Are you honestly telling me that the calories from a ...tomato and from a fried dough..are somehow similar calories in your eyes. One calorie count is packed with nutrition and one calorie count is not. wow. i can't believe you have to be told that but...ok.

  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,576 Member
    Options
    EvanKeel wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    laurielima wrote: »
    rsm193 wrote: »
    Is there a difference between good and bad calories or are calories just calories...like is it ok to eat fried food from home made in the deep fryer? Are those considered bad calories?

    I did not mean to be so abrupt but asking if cals are good or bad starts a big rukus on this site. in my opinion...there are bad cals in the food world. I do eat them but I know they are bad and I adjust ALL of my eating to support the fact that I am eating bad calories.

    other people want to call it healthy cals v unhealthy cals or empty cals v nutritious cals.

    Its just splitting hairs. IMO

    What makes specific calorie bad?

    When it's more than you need.

    If the calorie is more than you need, it's no better or worse because of the eating. It just is what it is either way. The act of eating the excess calorie may lead to a undesired effect. To me it's an important distinction.

    I disagree. Calories that are more than I need are bad. But bad is just an opinion so it's okay if we don't agree.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,139 Member
    Options
    Op NO ...

    100 calories of donuts = 100 calories of vegetables.

    This does not mean that they are nutritional twins.

    what matters is that you hit your macro/micro/calories targets for the day, which means that you should be eating nutrient dense foods like chicken, vegetables, fish, rice, etc, and then filling in with things that you like, like ice cream, cookies, pasta, bagels etc.

    there is no good or bad food.
  • asdowe13
    asdowe13 Posts: 1,951 Member
    Options
    laurielima wrote: »
    EvanKeel wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    laurielima wrote: »
    rsm193 wrote: »
    Is there a difference between good and bad calories or are calories just calories...like is it ok to eat fried food from home made in the deep fryer? Are those considered bad calories?

    I did not mean to be so abrupt but asking if cals are good or bad starts a big rukus on this site. in my opinion...there are bad cals in the food world. I do eat them but I know they are bad and I adjust ALL of my eating to support the fact that I am eating bad calories.

    other people want to call it healthy cals v unhealthy cals or empty cals v nutritious cals.

    Its just splitting hairs. IMO

    What makes specific calorie bad?

    When it's more than you need.

    If the calorie is more than you need, it's no better or worse because of the eating. It just is what it is either way. The act of eating the excess calorie may lead to a undesired effect. To me it's an important distinction.

    Are you honestly telling me that the calories from a ...tomato and from a fried dough..are somehow similar calories in your eyes. One calorie count is packed with nutrition and one calorie count is not. wow. i can't believe you have to be told that but...ok.

    A calorie is a calorie!

    However, the makeup of that calorie will differ nutritionally.

    This does not make one any worse than the other.

    You can't look at individual foods as healthy or not, you have to take the overall diet into play.

    Both tomatoes and fried dough can be part of a healthy diet.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,139 Member
    Options
    laurielima wrote: »
    EvanKeel wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    laurielima wrote: »
    rsm193 wrote: »
    Is there a difference between good and bad calories or are calories just calories...like is it ok to eat fried food from home made in the deep fryer? Are those considered bad calories?

    I did not mean to be so abrupt but asking if cals are good or bad starts a big rukus on this site. in my opinion...there are bad cals in the food world. I do eat them but I know they are bad and I adjust ALL of my eating to support the fact that I am eating bad calories.

    other people want to call it healthy cals v unhealthy cals or empty cals v nutritious cals.

    Its just splitting hairs. IMO

    What makes specific calorie bad?

    When it's more than you need.

    If the calorie is more than you need, it's no better or worse because of the eating. It just is what it is either way. The act of eating the excess calorie may lead to a undesired effect. To me it's an important distinction.

    Are you honestly telling me that the calories from a ...tomato and from a fried dough..are somehow similar calories in your eyes. One calorie count is packed with nutrition and one calorie count is not. wow. i can't believe you have to be told that but...ok.

    yes, they are units of energy; however, they are not nutritional twins.

    you are conflating calories with nutrition, not the same thing.

  • yopeeps025
    yopeeps025 Posts: 8,680 Member
    Options
    sgthaggard wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    laurielima wrote: »
    rsm193 wrote: »
    Is there a difference between good and bad calories or are calories just calories...like is it ok to eat fried food from home made in the deep fryer? Are those considered bad calories?

    I did not mean to be so abrupt but asking if cals are good or bad starts a big rukus on this site. in my opinion...there are bad cals in the food world. I do eat them but I know they are bad and I adjust ALL of my eating to support the fact that I am eating bad calories.

    other people want to call it healthy cals v unhealthy cals or empty cals v nutritious cals.

    Its just splitting hairs. IMO

    What makes specific calorie bad?
    I'd like to hear an answer to this. A calorie is a way of measuring energy. Saying that there are good and bad calories is like saying there are good and bad inches.

    Well yeah because 4 inches is bad and 5 inches is good. So they claim.
  • auddii
    auddii Posts: 15,357 Member
    Options
    laurielima wrote: »
    Wow did you ever ask a loaded question for this site..no good or bad references on this site...so jump in and eat that deep fried twinkee wrapped in bacon. good luck to you.

    I'm headed to the Houston rodeo soon where we're known for our friend food. Definitely have had deep fried twinkies and deep fried bacon, but I've not seen those combined. I need to suggest it to someone because it sounds awesome...
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,139 Member
    Options
    MrM27 wrote: »
    laurielima wrote: »
    rsm193 wrote: »
    Is there a difference between good and bad calories or are calories just calories...like is it ok to eat fried food from home made in the deep fryer? Are those considered bad calories?

    I did not mean to be so abrupt but asking if cals are good or bad starts a big rukus on this site. in my opinion...there are bad cals in the food world. I do eat them but I know they are bad and I adjust ALL of my eating to support the fact that I am eating bad calories.

    other people want to call it healthy cals v unhealthy cals or empty cals v nutritious cals.

    Its just splitting hairs. IMO

    What makes specific calorie bad?

    When it's more than you need.

    that is a ridiculous definition ..

    so if you go 100 calories over your day is "bad"....
  • Metruis
    Metruis Posts: 60 Member
    Options
    There is no scientific proof to back up "3500 calories = 1 pound of weight".

    None. There was this guy who contained a bunch of health organizations and asked where it came from and none of them knew.

    It's arbitrary, and there are many studies that have demonstrated that people who are put on say, a diet of 2000 calories, but with different macros, even though they should THEORETICALLY all lose the same amount of weight... don't. There are people who have gorged themselves senseless for a month on fat and protein and gained nothing, even though by the calorie count, they should have put on 20 pounds.

    There are not bad calories. A calorie is a measurement. There are bad foods. You will probably lose weight if you ate at a deficit but only ate chocolate. Weight loss is not a linear and mathematical thing. It's influenced by exercise, insulin resistance, macro nutrients, so on and so forth... putting healthier foods in will see more energy, more energy will make you more active, more activity will make you burn more... putting in sugary foods might make you miserable and fatigued and thus do less...

    Calories are a measurement. Like a cup. A cup of sugar and a cup of chopped carrots have different nutrients, it doesn't mean that it's bad. A cup of sugar might be exactly what you need in your cake. 100 calories of chocolate is different than 100 calories of carrots. Neither is bad. They're just different, because of their nutritional profile. Sure, if you eat 1000 calories of chocolate in a day you will lose weight, probably, as demonstrated by "monodiets" but you'll feel like crap. So... hence weight loss not just being a numbers game. I'm in camp 'macros', though, and 'eat based on what your body tells you (not your mind)'. Intuitive eating works well for me. So... take my judgement with a grain of salt.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,139 Member
    Options
    Metruis wrote: »
    There is no scientific proof to back up "3500 calories = 1 pound of weight".

    None. There was this guy who contained a bunch of health organizations and asked where it came from and none of them knew.

    It's arbitrary, and there are many studies that have demonstrated that people who are put on say, a diet of 2000 calories, but with different macros, even though they should THEORETICALLY all lose the same amount of weight... don't. There are people who have gorged themselves senseless for a month on fat and protein and gained nothing, even though by the calorie count, they should have put on 20 pounds.

    There are not bad calories. A calorie is a measurement. There are bad foods. You will probably lose weight if you ate at a deficit but only ate chocolate. Weight loss is not a linear and mathematical thing. It's influenced by exercise, insulin resistance, macro nutrients, so on and so forth... putting healthier foods in will see more energy, more energy will make you more active, more activity will make you burn more... putting in sugary foods might make you miserable and fatigued and thus do less...

    Calories are a measurement. Like a cup. A cup of sugar and a cup of chopped carrots have different nutrients, it doesn't mean that it's bad. A cup of sugar might be exactly what you need in your cake. 100 calories of chocolate is different than 100 calories of carrots. Neither is bad. They're just different, because of their nutritional profile. Sure, if you eat 1000 calories of chocolate in a day you will lose weight, probably, as demonstrated by "monodiets" but you'll feel like crap. So... hence weight loss not just being a numbers game. I'm in camp 'macros', though, and 'eat based on what your body tells you (not your mind)'. Intuitive eating works well for me. So... take my judgement with a grain of salt.

    why don't you do an experiment then

    Figure out your maintenance calories.
    Eat 500 calories a day over your maintenance level for three months.
    track your weight three times a week.
    do t his for four months
    report back with results and see if you gain/lose/maintain.

    I think I know what will happen ...but hey, this CICO, 3500 calorie stuff is just pie in the sky ...

    and please post full studies that you are referencing.

    who is advocating a diet of 1000 calories of chocolate? Why is that even a valid argument??
  • deksgrl
    deksgrl Posts: 7,237 Member
    Options
    laurielima wrote: »
    EvanKeel wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    laurielima wrote: »
    rsm193 wrote: »
    Is there a difference between good and bad calories or are calories just calories...like is it ok to eat fried food from home made in the deep fryer? Are those considered bad calories?

    I did not mean to be so abrupt but asking if cals are good or bad starts a big rukus on this site. in my opinion...there are bad cals in the food world. I do eat them but I know they are bad and I adjust ALL of my eating to support the fact that I am eating bad calories.

    other people want to call it healthy cals v unhealthy cals or empty cals v nutritious cals.

    Its just splitting hairs. IMO

    What makes specific calorie bad?

    When it's more than you need.

    If the calorie is more than you need, it's no better or worse because of the eating. It just is what it is either way. The act of eating the excess calorie may lead to a undesired effect. To me it's an important distinction.

    Are you honestly telling me that the calories from a ...tomato and from a fried dough..are somehow similar calories in your eyes. One calorie count is packed with nutrition and one calorie count is not. wow. i can't believe you have to be told that but...ok.

    You're confusing "good for you" with the definition of a calorie as a unit of measure.

    Are calories good or bad? No, they are equal, as a unit of measure of energy.

    Are some foods more good for you than others? Yes. Are some foods more nutritious? Yes. Are some foods more satisfying? Yes.

    Why is this a difficult concept to understand?