1200 calories? Macros?
Replies
-
Caloriesquiksylver296 wrote: »hassankarimi82 wrote: »Calories don't count. The constitution of the food does! You could eat salad and veg all day everyday and not hit that calorie target. Just eat good food sources. Keep protein high with some good quality fats. If you want to lose body fat, reduce your carbohydrate intake. Track carbs, not calories!
Just a note, @Ashleyfxo. When you get conflicting information from different posters, look and see how many posts they have made. @hassankarimi82 has made 42 posts. @teabea has made 9,085 posts and @SezxyStef has made 12,323 posts. You probably want to listen to the people who have been around awhile (and know what they are talking about).
I have only posted maybe 2x, because I have a job and a life, but I do have something to say on this topic: I have found that it really is math--calories in and calories out. I also do not agree with the low carb craze. I am a vegan body builder (my profile pic is NOT me however) and have had a great year of getting into shape. There are a ton of opinions out there so I experimented with different ways of doing this. I counted macros for a while; I increased and decreased calories on a schedule; I intermittent fasted. I figured out what works for me. You will too. Trust yourself and educate yourself.
I always weigh and measure and log my food (though I am now using cronometer). My food journey is ongoing and I appreciate other's opinions. However, I trust myself and my experience above all others.5 -
hassankarimi82 wrote: »Calories don't count. The constitution of the food does! You could eat salad and veg all day everyday and not hit that calorie target. Just eat good food sources. Keep protein high with some good quality fats. If you want to lose body fat, reduce your carbohydrate intake. Track carbs, not calories!
Calories do count... but I have a question.
Are you talking about the "If it fits your macros" way of eating? Assuming 1) you're in a macro deficit and 2) you're counting protein, fat, and carbs and meeting but not exceeding your daily allotment, when you calculate the calories consumed based on these variables, you would still be in a deficit calorically. Many people do use this method and have success since it helps to ensure satiety.
But in the end... the calories still count, whether you are actually counting them or not.
I hate IIFYM. That is the worst approach a person can take to dieting. I am all for eating food, and having that variety. But People abuse this more then they should, and then blame others for their short comings. Hey, I love cake, but I know I can't eat it every day, or even once a week. Be mindful of what your consuming.
Then you clearly do not understand IIFYM...
Give me a break! I do understand it. I have been around long enough to see people go, oh I can eat this cookie, or this donut because it fits into my calories, and fat and carbs for the day. Hell I even used it for a period of time. If you give people an inch they will take a mile, and I'm not saying that everyone abusing it, so don't think that I am saying that. What I am saying is, I don't care for it because people use it as a poor excuse to cheat on their diets. If people focused on eating a balanced diet, instead of trying to squeeze food into they shouldn't been eating in the first place they would have better results in the long run. If someone planned every Friday they were going to eat a donut and built that into their plan, good for them. But IIFYM comes from people, adding food throughout the day to meet whatever their goals are, not taking time to plan their meals out out in advance.
I follow IIFYM and have for almost 3 years...for 2 of those years I hit my protein and fat religiously...ate a chocolate bar every night of life...and no not the "good" dark chocolate...that nasty cadbury milk chocolate and those dreadful mini eggs...
I plan my meals in advance, eat well but have my treats.
Lately it's nibs and pringles...
Mmmm, Cadbury mini eggs. I
those. 2 -
hassankarimi82 wrote: »quiksylver296 wrote: »hassankarimi82 wrote: »I have....a friend. Why is he not obese when eating 2000 calories over maintenance?! According to MFP he should be 15 stone?! Really clean diet. High protein, high fat, low carb. Last year he weighed the same but this year dropped 5% body fat. How's that explained?! He's eating more, but making better choices. No further deficits created, such as implementing cardio.
Because he is not over maintenance. Either his maintenance is higher than originally thought, or he is eating less calories than he thinks, because he is not logging/tracking them.
Nope. Logging & tracking everything.
By weighing on a food scale, in grams?1 -
Who does this? Extreme examples prove nothing...alyssa_rest wrote: »You could stay under your calorie goal eating cake all day and lose weight, but it's an unhealthy way to look at weight loss.
I wasn't saying anyone did this. I was just using an example of a type of food that one could enter, but serves little to no nutritional value. I agreed with everyone with calorie counting, I just also thinks it matters what the calories consist of. I would think your body would react better to 100 calories of grilled chicken vs 100 calories of cake. Not weight loss, just overall health.1 -
hassankarimi82 wrote: »quiksylver296 wrote: »hassankarimi82 wrote: »I have....a friend. Why is he not obese when eating 2000 calories over maintenance?! According to MFP he should be 15 stone?! Really clean diet. High protein, high fat, low carb. Last year he weighed the same but this year dropped 5% body fat. How's that explained?! He's eating more, but making better choices. No further deficits created, such as implementing cardio.
Because he is not over maintenance. Either his maintenance is higher than originally thought, or he is eating less calories than he thinks, because he is not logging/tracking them.
Nope. Logging & tracking everything.
Why is he logging and tracking everything if calories don't matter?4 -
Sassie_Lassie wrote: »alyssa_rest wrote: »I think what @hassankarimi82 is TRYING to say (albeit lost in all these posts) is that the content of your calories matters as well. Your body craves and needs certain nutrients. You could stay under your calorie goal eating cake all day and lose weight, but it's an unhealthy way to look at weight loss. It does matter what you put into your body. So I see where he's coming from but also what everyone else is saying.
@alyssa_rest - go back and re-read what he has been posting. He is definitely NOT saying that. He consistently says that "calories don't count".
I was giving him the benefit of the doubt, haha! I try to be optimistic!
1 -
Sassie_Lassie wrote: »hassankarimi82 wrote: »quiksylver296 wrote: »hassankarimi82 wrote: »I have....a friend. Why is he not obese when eating 2000 calories over maintenance?! According to MFP he should be 15 stone?! Really clean diet. High protein, high fat, low carb. Last year he weighed the same but this year dropped 5% body fat. How's that explained?! He's eating more, but making better choices. No further deficits created, such as implementing cardio.
Because he is not over maintenance. Either his maintenance is higher than originally thought, or he is eating less calories than he thinks, because he is not logging/tracking them.
Nope. Logging & tracking everything.
Why is he logging and tracking everything if calories don't matter?
That's the whole point!!!0 -
hassankarimi82 wrote: »Um, this is what we are all saying...
You could say - macro and calorie track and eat junk food and reach your goals, but making good choices wouldn't require you to be strict and calories count. Are you saying a surplus of lettuce should be logged and tracked?! Do you weigh out....peas? Crazy if you ask me.
Example -
CAKE, track it yes.
VEGETABLES, don't bother. Fill your boots!
Understand? It depends on what the foods consist of.
I'm a volume eater, and I love vegetables. Look at my lunch today (and my dinner will have even more vegetables). Imagine if I didn't count vegetables. I would go on thinking that I consumed half the calories I actually consumed today and allow myself a higher calorie dinner or snack. I have always eaten good quality very nutrient rich foods, yet I managed to reach 139 kg on a diet people wouldn't usually associate with a typical diet of an obese person. Calories matter, and counting them is just a few extra seconds of my time in exchange for peace of mind, control, and ability to eat whatever I want without fearing it would break my calorie bank because every single calorie is accounted for.
3 -
alyssa_rest wrote: »I think what @hassankarimi82 is TRYING to say (albeit lost in all these posts) is that the content of your calories matters as well. Your body craves and needs certain nutrients. You could stay under your calorie goal eating cake all day and lose weight, but it's an unhealthy way to look at weight loss. It does matter what you put into your body. So I see where he's coming from but also what everyone else is saying.
Back to OP's question, I think looking at macros can be a great tool, but starting out, I would start just tracking your calories, getting an understanding of portion control, and letting yourself adjust to that. Try to eat cleaner and exercise and the weight will start working its way off. However, if you really want to count macros, it's a great way to ensure that you're eating a well-rounded diet. I count them and it seems to be working for me! It's not for everyone though. Good luck!
but this isn't about health, nutrition or body comp...it's about weight loss...
clean eating is not required even to be healthy and neither is exercise...
Macro counting is not required for weight loss...period.
Maybe I just look at the health of my body differently. I like to track food for weight (why I'm here) but also for content. I'm not saying I eat clean and count macros 100% of the time and I also know that not everyone likes to do it that way. Exactly why I said it's not for everyone. There is nothing wrong with only looking at the calorie deficit at all, I was just throwing in my two sense about macros since OP asked.1 -
hassankarimi82 wrote: »quiksylver296 wrote: »hassankarimi82 wrote: »I have....a friend. Why is he not obese when eating 2000 calories over maintenance?! According to MFP he should be 15 stone?! Really clean diet. High protein, high fat, low carb. Last year he weighed the same but this year dropped 5% body fat. How's that explained?! He's eating more, but making better choices. No further deficits created, such as implementing cardio.
Because he is not over maintenance. Either his maintenance is higher than originally thought, or he is eating less calories than he thinks, because he is not logging/tracking them.
Nope. Logging & tracking everything.
You can shout "HEALTHY FOODS" ..."MACROS!" from the rooftops.
Unfortunately, its math you're arguing with.1 -
alyssa_rest wrote: »alyssa_rest wrote: »I think what @hassankarimi82 is TRYING to say (albeit lost in all these posts) is that the content of your calories matters as well. Your body craves and needs certain nutrients. You could stay under your calorie goal eating cake all day and lose weight, but it's an unhealthy way to look at weight loss. It does matter what you put into your body. So I see where he's coming from but also what everyone else is saying.
Back to OP's question, I think looking at macros can be a great tool, but starting out, I would start just tracking your calories, getting an understanding of portion control, and letting yourself adjust to that. Try to eat cleaner and exercise and the weight will start working its way off. However, if you really want to count macros, it's a great way to ensure that you're eating a well-rounded diet. I count them and it seems to be working for me! It's not for everyone though. Good luck!
but this isn't about health, nutrition or body comp...it's about weight loss...
clean eating is not required even to be healthy and neither is exercise...
Macro counting is not required for weight loss...period.
Maybe I just look at the health of my body differently. I like to track food for weight (why I'm here) but also for content. I'm not saying I eat clean and count macros 100% of the time and I also know that not everyone likes to do it that way. Exactly why I said it's not for everyone. There is nothing wrong with only looking at the calorie deficit at all, I was just throwing in my two sense about macros since OP asked.
don't get me wrong I count macros to ensure I am getting in my nutrients...
I want to be healthy as well but when I first got here all I cared about was "weight loss"...had no clue about maintaining muscles etc...I wanted it gone and I wanted it gone fast...
Until I started reading and I got confused because of terms like clean eating, macros etc...I had been down the road of "diets"...
I feel if people get to the point I was then they strive to learn about health and nutrition but I see lots here and IRL that the bottom line is the scale and that's all that matters so I try not to throw out info that will either confuse them or cause "issues" with them...
I expect that this is a situation where the OP really cares about weight loss....
didn't mean to appear to "jump" on you. Esp since I agree with most of it.0 -
alyssa_rest wrote: »alyssa_rest wrote: »I think what @hassankarimi82 is TRYING to say (albeit lost in all these posts) is that the content of your calories matters as well. Your body craves and needs certain nutrients. You could stay under your calorie goal eating cake all day and lose weight, but it's an unhealthy way to look at weight loss. It does matter what you put into your body. So I see where he's coming from but also what everyone else is saying.
Back to OP's question, I think looking at macros can be a great tool, but starting out, I would start just tracking your calories, getting an understanding of portion control, and letting yourself adjust to that. Try to eat cleaner and exercise and the weight will start working its way off. However, if you really want to count macros, it's a great way to ensure that you're eating a well-rounded diet. I count them and it seems to be working for me! It's not for everyone though. Good luck!
but this isn't about health, nutrition or body comp...it's about weight loss...
clean eating is not required even to be healthy and neither is exercise...
Macro counting is not required for weight loss...period.
Maybe I just look at the health of my body differently. I like to track food for weight (why I'm here) but also for content. I'm not saying I eat clean and count macros 100% of the time and I also know that not everyone likes to do it that way. Exactly why I said it's not for everyone. There is nothing wrong with only looking at the calorie deficit at all, I was just throwing in my two sense about macros since OP asked.
don't get me wrong I count macros to ensure I am getting in my nutrients...
I want to be healthy as well but when I first got here all I cared about was "weight loss"...had no clue about maintaining muscles etc...I wanted it gone and I wanted it gone fast...
Until I started reading and I got confused because of terms like clean eating, macros etc...I had been down the road of "diets"...
I feel if people get to the point I was then they strive to learn about health and nutrition but I see lots here and IRL that the bottom line is the scale and that's all that matters so I try not to throw out info that will either confuse them or cause "issues" with them...
I expect that this is a situation where the OP really cares about weight loss....
didn't mean to appear to "jump" on you. Esp since I agree with most of it.
No problem, I get what you're saying as well! It is a lot to handle while first starting out. I also tell anyone I help with MFP to concentrate on calories and getting in the habit of logging first. I just wanted to give OP a little information since everyone seemed to be arguing amongst themselves, haha.0 -
alyssa_rest wrote: »alyssa_rest wrote: »I think what @hassankarimi82 is TRYING to say (albeit lost in all these posts) is that the content of your calories matters as well. Your body craves and needs certain nutrients. You could stay under your calorie goal eating cake all day and lose weight, but it's an unhealthy way to look at weight loss. It does matter what you put into your body. So I see where he's coming from but also what everyone else is saying.
Back to OP's question, I think looking at macros can be a great tool, but starting out, I would start just tracking your calories, getting an understanding of portion control, and letting yourself adjust to that. Try to eat cleaner and exercise and the weight will start working its way off. However, if you really want to count macros, it's a great way to ensure that you're eating a well-rounded diet. I count them and it seems to be working for me! It's not for everyone though. Good luck!
but this isn't about health, nutrition or body comp...it's about weight loss...
clean eating is not required even to be healthy and neither is exercise...
Macro counting is not required for weight loss...period.
Maybe I just look at the health of my body differently. I like to track food for weight (why I'm here) but also for content. I'm not saying I eat clean and count macros 100% of the time and I also know that not everyone likes to do it that way. Exactly why I said it's not for everyone. There is nothing wrong with only looking at the calorie deficit at all, I was just throwing in my two sense about macros since OP asked.
don't get me wrong I count macros to ensure I am getting in my nutrients...
I want to be healthy as well but when I first got here all I cared about was "weight loss"...had no clue about maintaining muscles etc...I wanted it gone and I wanted it gone fast...
Until I started reading and I got confused because of terms like clean eating, macros etc...I had been down the road of "diets"...
I feel if people get to the point I was then they strive to learn about health and nutrition but I see lots here and IRL that the bottom line is the scale and that's all that matters so I try not to throw out info that will either confuse them or cause "issues" with them...
I expect that this is a situation where the OP really cares about weight loss....
didn't mean to appear to "jump" on you. Esp since I agree with most of it.
Agreed! People with no knowledge of nutrition cannot do this at the same level as people who have educated themselves. Throwing ideas at them that are too complicated may to lead to failure. We have to remember where we started from, and give advice at that level. (No offense to anyone at any level
) 2 -
hassankarimi82 wrote: »Calories don't count. The constitution of the food does! You could eat salad and veg all day everyday and not hit that calorie target. Just eat good food sources. Keep protein high with some good quality fats. If you want to lose body fat, reduce your carbohydrate intake. Track carbs, not calories!
Oy vey! *headsmack*1 -
alyssa_rest wrote: »
Who does this? Extreme examples prove nothing...alyssa_rest wrote: »You could stay under your calorie goal eating cake all day and lose weight, but it's an unhealthy way to look at weight loss.
I wasn't saying anyone did this. I was just using an example of a type of food that one could enter, but serves little to no nutritional value. I agreed with everyone with calorie counting, I just also thinks it matters what the calories consist of. I would think your body would react better to 100 calories of grilled chicken vs 100 calories of cake. Not weight loss, just overall health.
Depends on what time of the month it is.
4 -
alyssa_rest wrote: »
Who does this? Extreme examples prove nothing...alyssa_rest wrote: »You could stay under your calorie goal eating cake all day and lose weight, but it's an unhealthy way to look at weight loss.
I wasn't saying anyone did this. I was just using an example of a type of food that one could enter, but serves little to no nutritional value. I agreed with everyone with calorie counting, I just also thinks it matters what the calories consist of. I would think your body would react better to 100 calories of grilled chicken vs 100 calories of cake. Not weight loss, just overall health.
Depends on what time of the month it is.
Well, last night, I enjoyed some caramel filled chocolate squares so I can definitely agree with this!
2 -
@ashleyfxo - regarding your original question about macros: it really depends what your goals are. I think to start of with you can you the defautls. However....
IF you want to build muscle and are following a strength building program then I would increase the protein. There is a lot of variability in what people think this should be. For me I find that aiming for roughtly 1 g of protein per pound of body weight works.
Satiety - some people feel fuller with more fat and some with more carbs. It will depend on you. No one wants to be starving and your goal is an especially aggressive one. I would vary your fat/carb intake and record how that makes you feel. Personally I feel more satisfied with carbs.
And for the rest of the discussion yes Calories absolutely count but I think you already knew that since you joined MFP. Make sure that whatever you do it is sustainable, following a draconian regime for 2 weeks won't do you as much good as making small changes that will last a lifetime.
Good luck to you!1 -
hassankarimi82 wrote: »I have....a friend. Why is he not obese when eating 2000 calories over maintenance?! According to MFP he should be 15 stone?! Really clean diet. High protein, high fat, low carb. Last year he weighed the same but this year dropped 5% body fat. How's that explained?! He's eating more, but making better choices. No further deficits created, such as implementing cardio.
Clearly his calorie burn is taking care of any excess. Kind of a no-brainer.1 -
I've changed my settings to lose 2lbs per week, and it's at 1200 calories which I'm fine with. Do I really need to follow the macros aswell? Or just 1200 calories?
It wants me to have like 70g of protein and 150g carbs.. I'm trying to lose 45lbs by October
No it's calories for weight loss...
However 2lbs a week with 45lbs is a bit aggressive...Ideally you would be losing 1lb a week...
If there is a timeline on the weight loss starting earlier would have been better because as you lose weight at an aggressive pace you will lose muscle not just fat.
You need to hit your macros! Hit your Marco goal and keep it in the calories goal. Go for a 40/40/20 diet0 -
I've changed my settings to lose 2lbs per week, and it's at 1200 calories which I'm fine with. Do I really need to follow the macros aswell? Or just 1200 calories?
It wants me to have like 70g of protein and 150g carbs.. I'm trying to lose 45lbs by October
No it's calories for weight loss...
However 2lbs a week with 45lbs is a bit aggressive...Ideally you would be losing 1lb a week...
If there is a timeline on the weight loss starting earlier would have been better because as you lose weight at an aggressive pace you will lose muscle not just fat.
You need to hit your macros! Hit your Marco goal and keep it in the calories goal. Go for a 40/40/20 diet
Polo!5 -
I've changed my settings to lose 2lbs per week, and it's at 1200 calories which I'm fine with. Do I really need to follow the macros aswell? Or just 1200 calories?
It wants me to have like 70g of protein and 150g carbs.. I'm trying to lose 45lbs by October
No it's calories for weight loss...
However 2lbs a week with 45lbs is a bit aggressive...Ideally you would be losing 1lb a week...
If there is a timeline on the weight loss starting earlier would have been better because as you lose weight at an aggressive pace you will lose muscle not just fat.
You need to hit your macros! Hit your Marco goal and keep it in the calories goal. Go for a 40/40/20 diet
no you don't need to hit your macros...as for the 40/40/20 that might not fit their lifestyle...doesn't fit mine.
0.8 grams of protein for each lb of weight (since I lift)
0.35 grams of fat for each lb of weight
rest carbs.4 -
I've changed my settings to lose 2lbs per week, and it's at 1200 calories which I'm fine with. Do I really need to follow the macros aswell? Or just 1200 calories?
It wants me to have like 70g of protein and 150g carbs.. I'm trying to lose 45lbs by October
No it's calories for weight loss...
However 2lbs a week with 45lbs is a bit aggressive...Ideally you would be losing 1lb a week...
If there is a timeline on the weight loss starting earlier would have been better because as you lose weight at an aggressive pace you will lose muscle not just fat.
You need to hit your macros! Hit your Marco goal and keep it in the calories goal. Go for a 40/40/20 diet
no you don't need to hit your macros...as for the 40/40/20 that might not fit their lifestyle...doesn't fit mine.
0.8 grams of protein for each lb of weight (since I lift)
0.35 grams of fat for each lb of weight
rest carbs.
Try to get 15 grams of fiber per 1000 calories as well...0 -
hassankarimi82 wrote: »I have....a friend. Why is he not obese when eating 2000 calories over maintenance?! According to MFP he should be 15 stone?! Really clean diet. High protein, high fat, low carb. Last year he weighed the same but this year dropped 5% body fat. How's that explained?! He's eating more, but making better choices. No further deficits created, such as implementing cardio.
Well there are two scenarios that I can think of.
1) He put on muscle and burned a little fat or...
2) He in fact did not drop 5% body fat in a 2000 calorie surplus because that would be absurd...0 -
hassankarimi82 wrote: »quiksylver296 wrote: »hassankarimi82 wrote: »I have....a friend. Why is he not obese when eating 2000 calories over maintenance?! According to MFP he should be 15 stone?! Really clean diet. High protein, high fat, low carb. Last year he weighed the same but this year dropped 5% body fat. How's that explained?! He's eating more, but making better choices. No further deficits created, such as implementing cardio.
Because he is not over maintenance. Either his maintenance is higher than originally thought, or he is eating less calories than he thinks, because he is not logging/tracking them.
Nope. Logging & tracking everything.
Then his maintenance is higher then he thought...0 -
alyssa_rest wrote: »
Who does this? Extreme examples prove nothing...alyssa_rest wrote: »You could stay under your calorie goal eating cake all day and lose weight, but it's an unhealthy way to look at weight loss.
I wasn't saying anyone did this. I was just using an example of a type of food that one could enter, but serves little to no nutritional value.
So you used an example for something you admit no one would do? Weird...
Calories are units of energy, nothing more nothing less...alyssa_rest wrote: »I agreed with everyone with calorie counting, I just also thinks it matters what the calories consist of. I would think your body would react better to 100 calories of grilled chicken vs 100 calories of cake. Not weight loss, just overall health.
1 -
If your new to losing weight, YES! Please track everything. Get yourself into the habit of what your food needs to look like. Know what 1800 looks like versus 1300, or 3500! Understand what a piece of cake will do to your body versus a serving of green beans. The problem people run into is they do not want to put in the work, so they don't bother, and they continue their unhealthy lifestyle. For those who want to make the change, and want to dedicate themselves, I will always recommend knowing what servings size they need to consume and after a while, it'll become second nature and they won't have to track any more.
Eating a piece of cake can make me happy. So can the green beans. Just depends on my mood. Both feed my body.2 -
indiaalexis wrote: »Caloriesquiksylver296 wrote: »hassankarimi82 wrote: »Calories don't count. The constitution of the food does! You could eat salad and veg all day everyday and not hit that calorie target. Just eat good food sources. Keep protein high with some good quality fats. If you want to lose body fat, reduce your carbohydrate intake. Track carbs, not calories!
Just a note, @Ashleyfxo. When you get conflicting information from different posters, look and see how many posts they have made. @hassankarimi82 has made 42 posts. @teabea has made 9,085 posts and @SezxyStef has made 12,323 posts. You probably want to listen to the people who have been around awhile (and know what they are talking about).
I have only posted maybe 2x, because I have a job and a life, but I do have something to say on this topic: I have found that it really is math--calories in and calories out. I also do not agree with the low carb craze. I am a vegan body builder (my profile pic is NOT me however) and have had a great year of getting into shape. There are a ton of opinions out there so I experimented with different ways of doing this. I counted macros for a while; I increased and decreased calories on a schedule; I intermittent fasted. I figured out what works for me. You will too. Trust yourself and educate yourself.
I always weigh and measure and log my food (though I am now using cronometer). My food journey is ongoing and I appreciate other's opinions. However, I trust myself and my experience above all others.
Hi there! New vegan here. I been debating if cronometer is different or the same as myfitnesspal. ..could you please share more?
How you use it, how it differs, pros, cons, etc.
Thank you.0 -
quiksylver296 wrote: »hassankarimi82 wrote: »Calories don't count. The constitution of the food does! You could eat salad and veg all day everyday and not hit that calorie target. Just eat good food sources. Keep protein high with some good quality fats. If you want to lose body fat, reduce your carbohydrate intake. Track carbs, not calories!
Just a note, @Ashleyfxo. When you get conflicting information from different posters, look and see how many posts they have made. @hassankarimi82 has made 42 posts. @teabea has made 9,085 posts and @SezxyStef has made 12,323 posts. You probably want to listen to the people who have been around awhile (and know what they are talking about).
How does the fact that someone has a lot of posts on this site mean they know more than anyone else? I can easily rack up 1,000 posts in a week if I want to stay on here all throughout each day posting. That's the same on any discussion board on the internet, lol. 0 -
perkymommy wrote: »quiksylver296 wrote: »hassankarimi82 wrote: »Calories don't count. The constitution of the food does! You could eat salad and veg all day everyday and not hit that calorie target. Just eat good food sources. Keep protein high with some good quality fats. If you want to lose body fat, reduce your carbohydrate intake. Track carbs, not calories!
Just a note, @Ashleyfxo. When you get conflicting information from different posters, look and see how many posts they have made. @hassankarimi82 has made 42 posts. @teabea has made 9,085 posts and @SezxyStef has made 12,323 posts. You probably want to listen to the people who have been around awhile (and know what they are talking about).
How does the fact that someone has a lot of posts on this site mean they know more than anyone else? I can easily rack up 1,000 posts in a week if I want to stay on here all throughout each day posting. That's the same on any discussion board on the internet, lol.
Number of posts doesn't really mean anything IMO. There's folks with thousands of posts who hang out mainly in the chit chat board, then there's the post "collectors".0 -
perkymommy wrote: »quiksylver296 wrote: »hassankarimi82 wrote: »Calories don't count. The constitution of the food does! You could eat salad and veg all day everyday and not hit that calorie target. Just eat good food sources. Keep protein high with some good quality fats. If you want to lose body fat, reduce your carbohydrate intake. Track carbs, not calories!
Just a note, @Ashleyfxo. When you get conflicting information from different posters, look and see how many posts they have made. @hassankarimi82 has made 42 posts. @teabea has made 9,085 posts and @SezxyStef has made 12,323 posts. You probably want to listen to the people who have been around awhile (and know what they are talking about).
How does the fact that someone has a lot of posts on this site mean they know more than anyone else? I can easily rack up 1,000 posts in a week if I want to stay on here all throughout each day posting. That's the same on any discussion board on the internet, lol.
It's more about the content of the posts and chances are that if you don't post much you either have nothing to add or have posted previous and gotten served for giving out bad information.
As well it's more about who has been here for a while and shown they are learning more and more and giving good solid advice that helps people.
Even if there are some people who could think a poster is an idiot that doesn't make it true. There are a lot of smart educated individuals here (sometime you never know when you are talking to a doctor or a RD or Physiotherapist) who read studies as part of their job and pass along information to people who want it.
For example look at the user voted "most valuable posts" that have been put in a pinned post..that's a good sign too.3
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions