We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

This is why people gain weight, and why losing it is so hard.

1567810

Replies

  • Posts: 538 Member

    I'm not saying that I can't eat 1900 calories every day, I'm just saying that, and no offense and its nothing personal, nothing on that list looks very good to me at all. I mean I am willing to eat all of those things, I'm not a picky eater, but its not what I want. I find happiness in food that taste good, things that are fried, things that have a lot of cheese and/or creamy sauces, I like soda. That's where its so hard. I'm not saying I can't do it, I'm upset because I know I'm not going to be happy doing it.

    @jdb3388 Hey! Have you thought about attending healthy eating cookery classes?

    Also, if you like fried stuff, what about buying one of those low fat fryers? They only require one spoonful of oil and can be used for many different dishes... you could use rapessed oil... Try buying light cheeses, Leerdammer and many other brands have lighter versions... as well of low calories sauces.

    But to be honest, you could get used to anything. I used to take my coffee with two or three teaspoons of sugar + full fat milk instead of water. I started cutting down and now I can drink black coffee without milk or sugar and it tastes nice to me...
  • Posts: 15,357 Member

    I tried something very similar to that once, but it didn't work out because I was still in a deficit. There were days where I would eat less than 500 calories some days in order to eat what I wanted other days. It came out to about 7K surplus for the week overall. So it is worth repeating this point: something that works for you might not work for those of us who have bigger appetites. For some of us, this plan doesn't help eliminate both hunger and weight, which is really the problem OP expects to encounter (and a problem I'm already encountering as I get closer and closer to goal).

    Here is how that works for someone like me: I'm hungry all the time anyway, whether eating 500 or 1,500 or 2,500 calories... so no difference on most days. On some days, though, I can eat as much as I want and am not hungry. So then it is a matter of figuring out how often to have a day where I can eat as much as I want and still lose weight, and how much I can eat on other days. So figure 10K calories is what it takes to satisfy me in a day. If I do that once every 10 days, I can still keep an average deficit of 250 calories per day (1/2 lb. per week loss on average) as long as I eat 500 calories the other 9 days. For 9 days, I'm hungry no matter what, but at least once every 10 days, I am not hungry because I can finally eat. Of course this is a terrible idea and I'm not suggesting it. I just want to illustrate why those last few lbs. are so hard to lose for those of us with big appetites and a decreased RMR. Your weekly average idea is a daunting suggestion that is probably great for those with mediocre appetites, but not so great for others.

    Well, it doesn't work for you because you didn't maintain a deficit. I guess I'm lost on the point here?

    Aiming for a weekly deficit works if you remain in a deficit. You can have an equal distribution of that deficit across every day or you can vary your deficit each day (a surplus of 800 calories above goal can be balanced by 4 other days being 200 calories under your goal). But just because you say you're going to eat low on two days and then don't bother sticking to a weekly deficit, of course that's not going to work.

    There are lots of different strategies to help people stay in a deficit. All of them are valid, but not all will work for every person.

    Which is why it is repeated over and over again on these boards to find what works and helps you hit your calorie goal.
  • Posts: 4,855 Member
    edited September 2016

    Your choice.

    Continue to eat like you have been ~~>> remain the over weight man you have been.
    Eat better 80% of the time ~~>> lose weight - finally. After years of struggle.


    It is so worth it to make these changes. Is it a perfect world (according to jdb) ~~>>No.

    No one here really has any say in this. It's your life. Stay big. Your choice. ::shrug::

    I disagree. Continue like he has been and he will be an overweight corpse long before his time.

    For the OP, you're in your 20's. Have you ever seen anyone age 60 that eats like you? Most likely not since they've been dead 10+ years. Clean up your habits food and exercise wise while you're young.

    Best of luck.
  • Posts: 1,520 Member
    jdb3388 wrote: »
    So before I get into what I'm about to say, I'd like to thank everyone who was constructive towards me while I was having a low moment.

    A lot of you gave some great advice, even though I am pretty well versed in weight loss and knew a lot of it already. But here's the thing, I didn't ask for advice. There was no question in my original post. I was just making conversation about how difficult it is going to be to eat a reasonable amount of food once I get to my goal weight. Obviously, I have a problem when it comes to food. For a lot of you its just a thing you do 3ish times a day so you will continue to have energy and live. For me, its almost ceremonious. Eating is not just something I do to survive, its something I thoroughly enjoy. Meal time is something I look forward to for reasons other than hunger. Telling me to just eat healthier/lower calorie/more nutritious/whatever foods is like telling a cocaine addict that he should just smoke pot instead and everything will be alright. It's not a matter of knowing what to do, because God knows I know exactly what to do, its a matter of being able to do it. I'm only on day 12 and I've been doing well so far. There is no reason for me to believe I cant continue what I'm doing for many months. It's after that that concerns me, and once again, its not that I can't, its that I'm having to chose between something I enjoy, and something I need to be healthy. There's no answer, no way to fix it. I didn't ask anyone to help me solve the problem. I was just making conversation about how it sucks.

    Also, to the guy who couldn't figure out how I ate 4500 (a rounded number) calories in a day, book this out:

    Breakfast - A.M. Sausage Crunchwrap from Taco Bell
    Lunch - 5 Krystals and a Chili Chese Fry from Krystal
    Afternoon Snack - King Size Kit-Kat and 16oz Red Bull
    Dinner - Cajun Chicken Pasta from Chili's

    Throughout the day (including at meals)- About 80oz of Coke

    If you are thinking about saying "well surely you don't eat the same thing ever day", no, but similar. And I did drink about the same amount of coke every day and eat a candy bar (sometimes a Mounds or a Twix) and a Red Bull every day.

    Again, I'm not asking you for help, I'm just making conversation about how much it F#*$&%@ sucks.
    It doesn't suck. YOU have an attachment to food that you clearly don't want to give up. I get it. I do. That is why Keto works for me. Sugar in all it's forms just makes me want more, and so I binge. Going very low carb I get to enjoy cheese, meat, cream, oils, and not feel like I'm missing out.

    If anyone beforehand hasn't suggested you see someone for help with this obsession and adulation of food, then I highly recommend it.

    It took me severely injuring myself from simply picking my son up from his crib to wake up and see how big I'd gotten. Ovarian cysts, everything in my body was begging me to change.

    This is NOT just a few months. This is YOUR LIFE. ENTIRELY.

  • Posts: 11,502 Member
    auddii wrote: »

    Well, it doesn't work for you because you didn't maintain a deficit. I guess I'm lost on the point here?

    Aiming for a weekly deficit works if you remain in a deficit. You can have an equal distribution of that deficit across every day or you can vary your deficit each day (a surplus of 800 calories above goal can be balanced by 4 other days being 200 calories under your goal). But just because you say you're going to eat low on two days and then don't bother sticking to a weekly deficit, of course that's not going to work.

    There are lots of different strategies to help people stay in a deficit. All of them are valid, but not all will work for every person.

    Which is why it is repeated over and over again on these boards to find what works and helps you hit your calorie goal.

    The point was that there is no mathematical way for some of us to have both a deficit (daily, weekly, etc.) and to not be hungry. For people who can be satisfied with 800 calories over, that might work. For some of us, though, the number of calories it takes to really be satisfied is too many to balance out over a week's time.
  • Posts: 1,804 Member
    edited September 2016
    2 and 3) Healthy BMI is a range for a reason. A really broad range. 30 to 55 pounds wide from short to tall people. You think he actually looks skinny as hell 45 pounds before someone who is exactly the same height as him would be considererd too skinny by BMI?

    To your second question, yes. Picture competitive shot putter/discus thrower. Imagine them shedding weight to get to 190 pounds at 6'1. Suffice it to say, muscle is coming off. They'll look wrong and unhealthy. Maybe you don't like "skinny" as a descriptor for it. I don't know of a better word.

    To your first point, BMI damn well better be a broad range. It compares a 2-dimensional property with a 3-dimensional property. In other words, it pretends taller people aren't also broader in order to maintain proportion (in terms of frame not in terms of fat).

    And since we're way off topic and neither of us is convincing the other, I'm done.
  • Posts: 11 Member
    I have had exactly the same thoughts over the years as I was trying to lose weight. I'm older and dealing with joint pain that keeps me from doing things I used to really enjoy. My overeating is deeply rooted from childhood -- associated with friends and family and socializing. Also food has been my buddy when I am stressed or bored. Over the years I have eliminated most of my "go to" foods because I just don't desire them anymore. My tastes have changed because my eating habits have slowly morphed to healthy choices. Soda used to be a mainstay, now I can't drink it. Don't underestimate the benefits of changing your eating habits now while you're young.
  • Posts: 224 Member
    I'm somewhat in the same boat OP. I sincerely miss eating a sleeve of chips ahoy and a giant glass of milk...every night. Sometimes thinking of never doing that again makes me sad, angry and resentful. Walking by the damn things at work 8x a day pisses me off...a lot.

    For *me, I've not settled on a final goal weight at all. For now I'm just losing until it sucks too much. Then I'll maintain there for a while and decide again. I think that point will be around 180-ish. Still fat. But not as fat as 248. Shrug. I'm not chasing perfection.
  • Posts: 16,049 Member
    edited September 2016
    I find having a IDGAF day once or twice a month is enough to satisfy me these days, and will hold me over til the next month. It's all down to what you get yourself used too.

    @jdb3388 I bet you'll come back to this thread when you're down to goal weight and laugh at your panic, because by that time you'll be a whole different person, both in body AND mind.
  • Posts: 784 Member
    edited September 2016
    This gal can SO relate.
  • Posts: 16,049 Member

    The idea that you would be miserable if you couldn't eat all the things you want to eat boggles my mind. I mean, that's kind of just the way life is: you don't get to do every thing you ever want to do. I would like to be at Disney World right now. Am I at Disney World right now? No. No, I am not. Does that mean I'm miserable because I don't have what I want? No, because there are other lovely things in my life right now, and I choose to appreciate and enjoy them.

    Additionally, how do you know what you will feel like when you're at your goal weight and in maintenance? You're not there yet. I'd understand a lot better if you said "I'm at my goal weight and trying to maintain, but I'm hungry all the time." As it is, it seems like you're just borrowing hypothetical future trouble. And I don't understand why you would choose to do that.

    Valid points.

    Being in control of our emotions/hunger/whims/desires/cravings etc etc is all part of being an Adult. Sometimes we just don't get to do everything we want, when we want. Such is life...
  • Posts: 132 Member
    leajas1 wrote: »

    I love this, because it IS a major loss, isn't it? Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, then Acceptance. OP, sounds like you might be in the anger or depression stage. Don't give up. Take to heart all the other suggestions and advice of the people who have posted - they've been where you are. It's hard to believe that you won't always feel the way you do today, but your feelings will change, your cravings will change, your goals will change, your body will change. You've heard it from many on here and it happened to me too. Follow the plan and refocus on your goal for TODAY. Then worry about tomorrow. Wishing you the best.

    Edit to add: P.S. I only had ONE bite of that donut in my profile pic. That NEVER would have happened two years ago. I would have eaten the whole thing and then some. I still have days those 4k calorie days, but it happens so few and far between now. It's a lifelong thing, not something that is a quick fix. Once I realized that (and grieved) my whole attitude changed.

    I was really hoping you had eaten that doughnut because it looks soooo delish!! =)
  • Posts: 132 Member
    jdb3388 wrote: »
    For me, its almost ceremonious. Eating is not just something I do to survive, its something I thoroughly enjoy. Meal time is something I look forward to for reasons other than hunger. Telling me to just eat healthier/lower calorie/more nutritious/whatever foods is like telling a cocaine addict that he should just smoke pot instead and everything will be alright. It's not a matter of knowing what to do, because God knows I know exactly what to do, its a matter of being able to do it.

    Again, I'm not asking you for help, I'm just making conversation about how much it F#*$&%@ sucks.

    You know what? I 100% agree with you. It totally sucks. But the good thing is that after you've done it for awhile (subjective), you won't miss food as much. It won't end up being as euphoric and delish as it feels right now. It takes a long while, but eventually, you're not gonna feel like it sucks because you'll be used to eating differently.

    But until you no longer miss it, we can totally feel the suckiness of it together. I'm with you: it does suck!
    Don't you wish we could just eat whatever we wanted with no repercussions? That would be amazing! :smiley:

  • Posts: 19,251 Member
    edited September 2016

    You started out alright and then turned to the assumption that everyone wants to have a kid to illustrate your point that everyone turns out the same. I'm not like OP because I hadn't thought about how little I would have to eat after losing weight. But had I considered it, I would have felt like he does now. As a childfree man who knew as a teenager (because I thought about that) he didn't ever want to have kids; I haven't ever changed my mind. Your logic that everyone will do a 180 on what they want out of life makes me feel insulted.

    Agree 100%. Her post started fine, but then, yeah, turned into something else.
  • Posts: 11,502 Member
    _piaffe wrote: »
    I had considered doing an Edit to add the starting premise - which I thought was obvious - ie that we were talking generally about a person who wanted a particular outcome, but is DEEPLY conflicted on the impact that outcome would have on current lifestyle.

    In my analogy, that outcome was a child. Of course, not everybody wants a child - that is a completely valid choice. OP is deeply conflicted because he WANTS to lose weight. Yet does not want to give up his lifestyle.

    I should have done the edit or not bothered posting. Sigh. And sorry for unintended offence!

    That makes a little bit more sense, but your first post mentions someone is childfree and then ends up being happy with a kid later in life. Childfree is a term used for people like me who neither have nor want to have kids ever. It is often misunderstood and confused with those who are childless, which would properly describe a person who has no kids, but wants to have kids (even if they are not sure it would fit into their expected lifestyle). For someone like me who is childfree, the idea that I would be happy caring for a kid must assume that I haven't known what I really want out of life for the last 2 decades since I made that decision, but that you do know exactly what I want out of life even better than I know. I hope that helps you understand why this is so upsetting.
  • Posts: 19,251 Member
    _piaffe wrote: »
    I had considered doing an Edit to add the starting premise - which I thought was obvious - ie that we were talking generally about a person who wanted a particular outcome, but is DEEPLY conflicted on the impact that outcome would have on current lifestyle.

    In my analogy, that outcome was a child. Of course, not everybody wants a child - that is a completely valid choice. OP is deeply conflicted because he WANTS to lose weight. Yet does not want to give up his lifestyle.

    I should have done the edit or not bothered posting. Sigh. And sorry for unintended offence!

    I got what you were going for, just didn't think it lined up to the OP's situation. I wasn't offended.
This discussion has been closed.