Of refeeds and diet breaks
Options
Replies
-
rickinnercirclebet wrote: »I'm looking forward to reaching goal weight so I can use all this knowledge to manipulate body comp. I'm lucky I burn fat and gain muscle easily so when I get switched on I can make great gains.
Just got about 100 more pounds of fat to burn first...
If you do have that much to lose, you actually are at a metabolic advantage over a natural lean athlete to manipulate body composition. Lift heavy things properly, eat enough protein, and be at a deficit *just low enough to lose weight*, but not so low that you hate life. I'll use the Physiqonomics heurisic: for fat loss, training supports your diet; for muscle gain, diet supports your training.
Right, I'm eating 40/30/30 on 2000 calories
training 2 x weekly heavy weights - deadlifting etc, real improvement in strength in 12 weeks, dropped 35lbs in weight, 140 total to lose.
As I get stronger and therefore can train harder still I'll try the body recomp. Have a PT who is a competitive, natural bodybuilder and he is on the case
But I'd really welcome advice and explanations if you were inclined to help. Doing a few HIIT cardio sessions a week too.2 -
(☞゚ヮ゚)☞ ☜(゚ヮ゚☜)
I tend to generalize a lot of my responses, but you're welcome @Nony_Mouse
I have the tendency to get up my own hole regarding being neurotic about the nuances of stuff like fluctuations, macros, micros, labs, etc., so it becomes a reminder if I express to everyone else that being on my level of insanity isn't recommended haha. Cheers!
Genralised is good imho @anubis609. Even if the person you're responding to already knows it, others can learn. That was really my primary objective in starting this thread, trying to get concepts like diet breaks etc out to the general MFP populace. I know a lot of people are quite happy just trucking along, they don't feel the need to understand all the physiology behind weight loss, nor do they need to (I'm a bit of a geek, so I want to understand it), but when something as simple as taking a couple of weeks out at maintenance can actually help their weight loss, then that's good stuff to know. And I think it helps to see other people say 'hey, yeah, I've done that, didn't gain 10 lbs, felt awesome, and the process seems easier/more effective again after'.9 -
rickinnercirclebet wrote: »rickinnercirclebet wrote: »I'm looking forward to reaching goal weight so I can use all this knowledge to manipulate body comp. I'm lucky I burn fat and gain muscle easily so when I get switched on I can make great gains.
Just got about 100 more pounds of fat to burn first...
If you do have that much to lose, you actually are at a metabolic advantage over a natural lean athlete to manipulate body composition. Lift heavy things properly, eat enough protein, and be at a deficit *just low enough to lose weight*, but not so low that you hate life. I'll use the Physiqonomics heurisic: for fat loss, training supports your diet; for muscle gain, diet supports your training.
Right, I'm eating 40/30/30 on 2000 calories
training 2 x weekly heavy weights - deadlifting etc, real improvement in strength in 12 weeks, dropped 35lbs in weight, 140 total to lose.
As I get stronger and therefore can train harder still I'll try the body recomp. Have a PT who is a competitive, natural bodybuilder and he is on the case
But I'd really welcome advice and explanations if you were inclined to help. Doing a few HIIT cardio sessions a week too.
If you trust in your trainer and are seeing objectively measurable real world results with strength increases, weight loss, and a diet composition that you're happy with, then I actually wouldn't impose any extra information. The only thing I can say, if your PT hasn't already told you, is that patience is going to be your best friend. The goal you've set for yourself is going to take longer than you expect to achieve. And this is absolutely normal because as you get leaner, your body is not going to like losing more energy (fat) than it feels that it needs to. Maintaining sub 10% bodyfat is doable, but by that time it's an absolute lifestyle change.
For now, you're 12 weeks in with a long road ahead of you. Keep doing what you're doing, enjoy the training, enjoy your diet, enjoy the periods of suck, enjoy the PRs.. you'll learn more as you go along, but if you can keep it as simple as possible, that will be your foundation for everything else.7 -
rickinnercirclebet wrote: »rickinnercirclebet wrote: »I'm looking forward to reaching goal weight so I can use all this knowledge to manipulate body comp. I'm lucky I burn fat and gain muscle easily so when I get switched on I can make great gains.
Just got about 100 more pounds of fat to burn first...
If you do have that much to lose, you actually are at a metabolic advantage over a natural lean athlete to manipulate body composition. Lift heavy things properly, eat enough protein, and be at a deficit *just low enough to lose weight*, but not so low that you hate life. I'll use the Physiqonomics heurisic: for fat loss, training supports your diet; for muscle gain, diet supports your training.
Right, I'm eating 40/30/30 on 2000 calories
training 2 x weekly heavy weights - deadlifting etc, real improvement in strength in 12 weeks, dropped 35lbs in weight, 140 total to lose.
As I get stronger and therefore can train harder still I'll try the body recomp. Have a PT who is a competitive, natural bodybuilder and he is on the case
But I'd really welcome advice and explanations if you were inclined to help. Doing a few HIIT cardio sessions a week too.
If you trust in your trainer and are seeing objectively measurable real world results with strength increases, weight loss, and a diet composition that you're happy with, then I actually wouldn't impose any extra information. The only thing I can say, if your PT hasn't already told you, is that patience is going to be your best friend. The goal you've set for yourself is going to take longer than you expect to achieve. And this is absolutely normal because as you get leaner, your body is not going to like losing more energy (fat) than it feels that it needs to. Maintaining sub 10% bodyfat is doable, but by that time it's an absolute lifestyle change.
For now, you're 12 weeks in with a long road ahead of you. Keep doing what you're doing, enjoy the training, enjoy your diet, enjoy the periods of suck, enjoy the PRs.. you'll learn more as you go along, but if you can keep it as simple as possible, that will be your foundation for everything else.
I've been super buff and superfat multiple times over the last 30 years so I know what to expect. Never had to recover from being this fat before though0 -
Nony_Mouse wrote: »(☞゚ヮ゚)☞ ☜(゚ヮ゚☜)
I tend to generalize a lot of my responses, but you're welcome @Nony_Mouse
I have the tendency to get up my own hole regarding being neurotic about the nuances of stuff like fluctuations, macros, micros, labs, etc., so it becomes a reminder if I express to everyone else that being on my level of insanity isn't recommended haha. Cheers!
Genralised is good imho @anubis609. Even if the person you're responding to already knows it, others can learn. That was really my primary objective in starting this thread, trying to get concepts like diet breaks etc out to the general MFP populace. I know a lot of people are quite happy just trucking along, they don't feel the need to understand all the physiology behind weight loss, nor do they need to (I'm a bit of a geek, so I want to understand it), but when something as simple as taking a couple of weeks out at maintenance can actually help their weight loss, then that's good stuff to know. And I think it helps to see other people say 'hey, yeah, I've done that, didn't gain 10 lbs, felt awesome, and the process seems easier/more effective again after'.
This speaks to me deeply lol. My dropbox is full of meta-analyses, RCTs, studies, etc. so much so to the point I can barely keep up.rickinnercirclebet wrote: »rickinnercirclebet wrote: »rickinnercirclebet wrote: »I'm looking forward to reaching goal weight so I can use all this knowledge to manipulate body comp. I'm lucky I burn fat and gain muscle easily so when I get switched on I can make great gains.
Just got about 100 more pounds of fat to burn first...
If you do have that much to lose, you actually are at a metabolic advantage over a natural lean athlete to manipulate body composition. Lift heavy things properly, eat enough protein, and be at a deficit *just low enough to lose weight*, but not so low that you hate life. I'll use the Physiqonomics heurisic: for fat loss, training supports your diet; for muscle gain, diet supports your training.
Right, I'm eating 40/30/30 on 2000 calories
training 2 x weekly heavy weights - deadlifting etc, real improvement in strength in 12 weeks, dropped 35lbs in weight, 140 total to lose.
As I get stronger and therefore can train harder still I'll try the body recomp. Have a PT who is a competitive, natural bodybuilder and he is on the case
But I'd really welcome advice and explanations if you were inclined to help. Doing a few HIIT cardio sessions a week too.
If you trust in your trainer and are seeing objectively measurable real world results with strength increases, weight loss, and a diet composition that you're happy with, then I actually wouldn't impose any extra information. The only thing I can say, if your PT hasn't already told you, is that patience is going to be your best friend. The goal you've set for yourself is going to take longer than you expect to achieve. And this is absolutely normal because as you get leaner, your body is not going to like losing more energy (fat) than it feels that it needs to. Maintaining sub 10% bodyfat is doable, but by that time it's an absolute lifestyle change.
For now, you're 12 weeks in with a long road ahead of you. Keep doing what you're doing, enjoy the training, enjoy your diet, enjoy the periods of suck, enjoy the PRs.. you'll learn more as you go along, but if you can keep it as simple as possible, that will be your foundation for everything else.
I've been super buff and superfat multiple times over the last 30 years so I know what to expect. Never had to recover from being this fat before though
Dude, you're practically a veteran at this point. You've basically optimized your recomp potential being formerly trained and coming back after a layoff. Nothing else really changes when leaning out/making gains unless you've developed some kind of metabolic disturbance; i.e. insulin resistance/fatty liver/T2D from the weight gain.. even then it's a minor hindrance in the grand scheme of things since insulin resistance is reversible with proper diet and training. Just don't rebound back to excessive fat gain.2 -
For anyone who wants to listen to the podcast as an mp3 rather than watching the video, it's available on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/macros-bodybuilding-powerlifting/id1145138636?mt=23
-
Nony_Mouse wrote: »(☞゚ヮ゚)☞ ☜(゚ヮ゚☜)
I tend to generalize a lot of my responses, but you're welcome @Nony_Mouse
I have the tendency to get up my own hole regarding being neurotic about the nuances of stuff like fluctuations, macros, micros, labs, etc., so it becomes a reminder if I express to everyone else that being on my level of insanity isn't recommended haha. Cheers!
Genralised is good imho @anubis609. Even if the person you're responding to already knows it, others can learn. That was really my primary objective in starting this thread, trying to get concepts like diet breaks etc out to the general MFP populace. I know a lot of people are quite happy just trucking along, they don't feel the need to understand all the physiology behind weight loss, nor do they need to (I'm a bit of a geek, so I want to understand it), but when something as simple as taking a couple of weeks out at maintenance can actually help their weight loss, then that's good stuff to know. And I think it helps to see other people say 'hey, yeah, I've done that, didn't gain 10 lbs, felt awesome, and the process seems easier/more effective again after'.
I'm taking an official break next week for two weeks because of this thread and others like it.
I took one that ended up being three months long and wasn't really a break, but going back to "eat whatever" and I got lucky that I ate at basically maintanence. Maybe it wasn't really luck though, because I knew it was a break, but there was no real plan for it. I just stopped tracking. This time I'm tracking, just eating a little more.
I find that after about three months I stop sticking to my plan as well as I do at the beginning of it. I may have to take scheduled breaks for the rest of my life, even at maintanence, where I allow myself to go over maintainance a bit for two weeks.
I thank you for this thread, and whoever else posted that article about diet breaks over the forums over the past couple weeks, it's just what I needed.11 -
Nony_Mouse wrote: »(☞゚ヮ゚)☞ ☜(゚ヮ゚☜)
I tend to generalize a lot of my responses, but you're welcome @Nony_Mouse
I have the tendency to get up my own hole regarding being neurotic about the nuances of stuff like fluctuations, macros, micros, labs, etc., so it becomes a reminder if I express to everyone else that being on my level of insanity isn't recommended haha. Cheers!
Genralised is good imho @anubis609. Even if the person you're responding to already knows it, others can learn. That was really my primary objective in starting this thread, trying to get concepts like diet breaks etc out to the general MFP populace. I know a lot of people are quite happy just trucking along, they don't feel the need to understand all the physiology behind weight loss, nor do they need to (I'm a bit of a geek, so I want to understand it), but when something as simple as taking a couple of weeks out at maintenance can actually help their weight loss, then that's good stuff to know. And I think it helps to see other people say 'hey, yeah, I've done that, didn't gain 10 lbs, felt awesome, and the process seems easier/more effective again after'.
I'm taking an official break next week for two weeks because of this thread and others like it.
I took one that ended up being three months long and wasn't really a break, but going back to "eat whatever" and I got lucky that I ate at basically maintanence. Maybe it wasn't really luck though, because I knew it was a break, but there was no real plan for it. I just stopped tracking. This time I'm tracking, just eating a little more.
I find that after about three months I stop sticking to my plan as well as I do at the beginning of it. I may have to take scheduled breaks for the rest of my life, even at maintanence, where I allow myself to go over maintainance a bit for two weeks.
I thank you for this thread, and whoever else posted that article about diet breaks over the forums over the past couple weeks, it's just what I needed.
I have those scheduled "*kitten* it" breaks entirely separately from official diet breaks. Although I have actually used them together on two week vacations. I think there's merit to that psychologically as long as it doesn't turn into oh *kitten* I gained 10/20/30lbs.9 -
After hearing about and reading the Matador study, and discussing the ins and outs with you, Nony_Mouse, I decided to go on a controlled diet break. I began last Monday, and have been finding it really hard to reach 150 grams carbs every day, but I get close. One thing I didn't consider is "net carbs" which I've never paid attention to. My fiber intake is very high, 40 - 45 grams on average. Do I need to worry about fiber negating the positive impact of increasing carbs?
(Looking forward to watching the video soon!)4 -
CynthiasChoice wrote: »After hearing about and reading the Matador study, and discussing the ins and outs with you, Nony_Mouse, I decided to go on a controlled diet break. I began last Monday, and have been finding it really hard to reach 150 grams carbs every day, but I get close. One thing I didn't consider is "net carbs" which I've never paid attention to. My fiber intake is very high, 40 - 45 grams on average. Do I need to worry about fiber negating the positive impact of increasing carbs?
(Looking forward to watching the video soon!)
Nup, don't worry about net carbs @CynthiasChoice. And if you think 150 is hard (btw as long as you're above 100 it's fine), I'm attempting to fit in 300g, and keep fat down. My dinner (currently in the oven) is insane. Like, not sure I can eat it all insane!5 -
To summarize, here's what I heard: "Little women (technical technical technical)",
"Competitive (technical technical technical)", "Dudes, of course you can eat more."
Since most of you are little women, listen carefully to the (technical technical technical). Sorry.5 -
VintageFeline wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »(☞゚ヮ゚)☞ ☜(゚ヮ゚☜)
I tend to generalize a lot of my responses, but you're welcome @Nony_Mouse
I have the tendency to get up my own hole regarding being neurotic about the nuances of stuff like fluctuations, macros, micros, labs, etc., so it becomes a reminder if I express to everyone else that being on my level of insanity isn't recommended haha. Cheers!
Genralised is good imho @anubis609. Even if the person you're responding to already knows it, others can learn. That was really my primary objective in starting this thread, trying to get concepts like diet breaks etc out to the general MFP populace. I know a lot of people are quite happy just trucking along, they don't feel the need to understand all the physiology behind weight loss, nor do they need to (I'm a bit of a geek, so I want to understand it), but when something as simple as taking a couple of weeks out at maintenance can actually help their weight loss, then that's good stuff to know. And I think it helps to see other people say 'hey, yeah, I've done that, didn't gain 10 lbs, felt awesome, and the process seems easier/more effective again after'.
I'm taking an official break next week for two weeks because of this thread and others like it.
I took one that ended up being three months long and wasn't really a break, but going back to "eat whatever" and I got lucky that I ate at basically maintanence. Maybe it wasn't really luck though, because I knew it was a break, but there was no real plan for it. I just stopped tracking. This time I'm tracking, just eating a little more.
I find that after about three months I stop sticking to my plan as well as I do at the beginning of it. I may have to take scheduled breaks for the rest of my life, even at maintanence, where I allow myself to go over maintainance a bit for two weeks.
I thank you for this thread, and whoever else posted that article about diet breaks over the forums over the past couple weeks, it's just what I needed.
I have those scheduled "*kitten* it" breaks entirely separately from official diet breaks. Although I have actually used them together on two week vacations. I think there's merit to that psychologically as long as it doesn't turn into oh *kitten* I gained 10/20/30lbs.
I never want to do this again (lose a large account of weight). I hope this time of massive NOT FUN deficit eating has given me enough motivation to make sure I've learned how to never let that happen again!
My plan is to allow a couple weeks of, once I get to maintainance, being allowed to eat over my limit by like 250 calories a day, then go back to a deficit to lose the extra.
This plan may change in a couple years when I get to maintainance, because I still have 100 pounds to go. I may say losing weight at that size is too hard to say *kitten* it, but I suspect I'll appreciate a bit of flexibility planned into my plan.
I also plan on having a range of weight to stay in, so I can prevent massive gains. Probably ten pounds of my goal, just to cover potential water weight. We'll see when I get closer. A lot can change in 100 pounds!
3 -
I just don't get this term "refeed". You only need to "refeed" if you've been starving yourself, it seems to me.13
-
I just don't get this term "refeed". You only need to "refeed" if you've been starving yourself, it seems to me.
Good job that's not what is meant when used in the correct context, as is being done within this thread. Even when the application of the term is erroneously used due to incorrect application (too short a refeed) it's still not a synonym for "starving myself at all other times outside of the refeeds".
Watching the video might help. Given that that's why it was posted.19 -
I have actually today decided I am likely going to sort of apply some of this to my last stretch. Just to line up what my body seems to naturally want from me while cutting. I'll do 3 weeks deficit, one week maintenance going forward. I only have maybe 16lbs to go before I switch to recomp and I do seem to struggle with full compliance after a few weeks (and always can return to full deficit after a few days with more food). Just making this method official will help psychologically no doubt!7
-
VintageFeline wrote: »I just don't get this term "refeed". You only need to "refeed" if you've been starving yourself, it seems to me.
Good job that's not what is meant when used in the correct context, as is being done within this thread. Even when the application of the term is erroneously used due to incorrect application (too short a refeed) it's still not a synonym for "starving myself at all other times outside of the refeeds".
Watching the video might help. Given that that's why it was posted.
Ya think??6 -
I'm too full to get into maintenance because today was long run day plus a load of walking... re-feed fail...2
-
TavistockToad wrote: »I'm too full to get into maintenance because today was long run day plus a load of walking... re-feed fail...
Had to give you a very sarcastic 'inspiring' on that sorry Toad!!
I am just up for the day, certainly not going 'where's the food', but then I never have breakfast until a couple of hours after I get up anyway.
Those on my friends' list saw the insanity that was my dinner last night - ~1000 cals of Potato Au Gratin, had to eat it in two gos! So, better planning needed. Hitting 2400 cals is nowhere near as easy when you're trying to keep fats down. Today I will be picking at some of that potatoy goodness throughout the day so there's not such a massive amount to eat at dinner.9 -
-
I hate watching videos, so I'll step in and offer some crib notes having listened to some of Lyle's podcasts.
Refeeds aren't because people are "starving" themselves.
When you diet, even if the deficit is a reasonable amount, certain hormones are downregulated and they affect satiation and your energy levels. The purpose of a higher carb maintenance refeed is to get those hormone levels back to baseline so that you are compliant with your diet, your energy levels when you exercise are where they should be, and your diet just overall works better.
@lorrpb, you might not "get this", but Lyle has studied this extensively and really does know what he's talking about. He's in the process of writing a book now geared specifically towards women and fat loss based on his findings.19
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 390 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 922 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions