Is Keto Worth it?
Replies
-
GaleHawkins wrote: »I do not think you understand when I comes to improving my health markers the averages of the human population results do not trump my n=1 results. If they sync up with general population statistics so be it and if not so be it.
Statistics is the best tool out there to twist the facts in the desired direction of the one paying the bill for the research. In undergrad school I did have a senior level Statistics Analysis class taught by the department head. He went over the BS associated with the field of statistics in general and how it can be a suckers game.
No. Actually the best tool to twist the facts in a desired direction is n=1. It is too easy to make faulty assumptions because there is no controlled process to determine if the results came from the source you think it did or multiple sources.
Health is impacted positively and negatively on many different fronts. Emotional wellbeing, genetics, weight, work or life stress, the food we eat, the air we breath, exercise, sleep, environmental factors, and so forth.
My health has improved since I moved last year. Did my old home make me unhealthy? Should I start telling everyone that wants to improve their health to move because of my n=1?
9 -
if it isnt something you can do for the rest of your life, i wouldnt do it.2
-
I have no means of measuring except I feel and see the difference, when I flex, my shape and overall bulk after a 15 pound loss, and I have done this many times before. But It may be I have only put 1 pound on because I havent been doing any heavy leg work. If so, that pound has gone a long way.
Its not just CNS strength gain. I cant quantify how much I think is strength gain, but its no where near as much as the muscle size gain. Perhaps too, because I know what exercises give me personally, the fastest gains, and the reps/sets/ etc to maximise that for me, that helps gain fast.
But the CNS is a really good topic, because it has a huge bearing on how effectively we recuperate from training. Cheers
I am sorry, but "feels" =/= actual results. You are making an assumption rather than making a statement based on actual data. Is there potential that you did gain some muscle? Maybe. But you don't have data to support your actual position. You have no clue if it was muscle gains, increase in blood flow (make you look pump), fat loss, muscle loss, etc...
I am glad you like what you see and have accomplished, but that in no way means you have data to support your position.
Thats the problem here on this forum. You have to have data, proof, verification. Experience means nothing! What you see in the mirror, its subjective, weights in the gym going up, oh just nervous energy, bigger biceps, oh thats easy...pump. I cant believe this. Ive been training for 45 years, 4 years as a competitive bodybuilder and you learn alot doing that. I have way more than just a "clue". You can have your science and data, I'll keep my results!
Is it a problem with the forum?
The root problem is that you are attempting to persuade, but the audience wants evidence. You can either blame the want or adapt and overcome by providing evidence.5 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »I have no means of measuring except I feel and see the difference, when I flex, my shape and overall bulk after a 15 pound loss, and I have done this many times before. But It may be I have only put 1 pound on because I havent been doing any heavy leg work. If so, that pound has gone a long way.
Its not just CNS strength gain. I cant quantify how much I think is strength gain, but its no where near as much as the muscle size gain. Perhaps too, because I know what exercises give me personally, the fastest gains, and the reps/sets/ etc to maximise that for me, that helps gain fast.
But the CNS is a really good topic, because it has a huge bearing on how effectively we recuperate from training. Cheers
I am sorry, but "feels" =/= actual results. You are making an assumption rather than making a statement based on actual data. Is there potential that you did gain some muscle? Maybe. But you don't have data to support your actual position. You have no clue if it was muscle gains, increase in blood flow (make you look pump), fat loss, muscle loss, etc...
I am glad you like what you see and have accomplished, but that in no way means you have data to support your position.
Thats the problem here on this forum. You have to have data, proof, verification. Experience means nothing! What you see in the mirror, its subjective, weights in the gym going up, oh just nervous energy, bigger biceps, oh thats easy...pump. I cant believe this. Ive been training for 45 years, 4 years as a competitive bodybuilder and you learn alot doing that. I have way more than just a "clue". You can have your science and data, I'll keep my results!
@Grambo54 you make valid points. I love science and data but in my life ONLY my n=1 has any personal medical validity. When old with failing health waiting 50 years for science and data to evolve is a death sentence.
I changed it from personal to medical to be more scientifically correct.
Which shows you've entirely missed the point. Finding something personally valid does not automatically make it medically/scientifically valid.
Finding something personally valid Does automatically make it medically and scientifically valid in n=1 trials.
I guess that depends entirely on what your definition of valid is. My n=1 that the earth is flat does not make it so.
Valid = improved health markers in my life.
And many people experience similar improvements in health markers simply from losing weight. This is why the n=1 doesn’t trump direct scientific evidence.
My n=1 results that reduces my risks of a premature death TRUMPS general population scientific evidence if the general population results are not the same as my n=1 results that continues to improve my health markers over time.
This result confirms your personal bias. Evidence trumps bias. Your health markers improved as you implemented a caloric deficit and returned to a healthy weight.
This does not impact the results. It only shows flaws in your root cause analysis.8 -
@galehawkins : are you even doing washout trials on yourself to serve as your own control? (Not that it matters statistically)...just probing you for your "logical" reasoning skills.
I'm just extremely questionable of your ability to analyze cause & effect & statistics since you seem to carelessly & frequently post (spam really) google search studies trying to back up whatever claims you attempt to make.5 -
I have no means of measuring except I feel and see the difference, when I flex, my shape and overall bulk after a 15 pound loss, and I have done this many times before. But It may be I have only put 1 pound on because I havent been doing any heavy leg work. If so, that pound has gone a long way.
Its not just CNS strength gain. I cant quantify how much I think is strength gain, but its no where near as much as the muscle size gain. Perhaps too, because I know what exercises give me personally, the fastest gains, and the reps/sets/ etc to maximise that for me, that helps gain fast.
But the CNS is a really good topic, because it has a huge bearing on how effectively we recuperate from training. Cheers
I am sorry, but "feels" =/= actual results. You are making an assumption rather than making a statement based on actual data. Is there potential that you did gain some muscle? Maybe. But you don't have data to support your actual position. You have no clue if it was muscle gains, increase in blood flow (make you look pump), fat loss, muscle loss, etc...
I am glad you like what you see and have accomplished, but that in no way means you have data to support your position.
Thats the problem here on this forum. You have to have data, proof, verification. Experience means nothing! What you see in the mirror, its subjective, weights in the gym going up, oh just nervous energy, bigger biceps, oh thats easy...pump. I cant believe this. Ive been training for 45 years, 4 years as a competitive bodybuilder and you learn alot doing that. I have way more than just a "clue". You can have your science and data, I'll keep my results!
Is it a problem with the forum?
The root problem is that you are attempting to persuade, but the audience wants evidence. You can either blame the want or adapt and overcome by providing evidence.
Not the whole forum but in general a toeing of the line that science, data, analysis, is only what counts, and if you cant prove what youre saying that way, your results are deemed invalid or at least unbelievable and bad advice. Science does not have all the answers.
The human body is so complex I dont believe science will ever know it all. Scientists often cant even all agree on even which methodology produces the most accurate results. its not that I believe science is wrong on everything, I just dont believe it knows enough to be right on everything. So therefore I am sceptical of scientific theories that are not fully proven nor fully endorsed by the whole scientific community. Im offering a different viewpoint to what is pushed here. One that recognises real life cases, personal experience, years competing, owning gyms and training and observing people wanting to improve. Call it broscience if you like but the bros just keep coming out of the gym looking great.
Heres something to throw out there for comment and comparison, no right or wrongs, but interesting to hear what people think. Diet quality is about 10% of results in the gym. Supplements (like protein shakes, vitamins) not worth listing. Program about 20%. Psychology (motivation,dedication,determination etc) 20%, lifting and intensity 30%, rest and recuperation 20%. And if diet is only 10 or 15% of the equation why do we spend 90% of the time on this forum talking about it14 -
I have no means of measuring except I feel and see the difference, when I flex, my shape and overall bulk after a 15 pound loss, and I have done this many times before. But It may be I have only put 1 pound on because I havent been doing any heavy leg work. If so, that pound has gone a long way.
Its not just CNS strength gain. I cant quantify how much I think is strength gain, but its no where near as much as the muscle size gain. Perhaps too, because I know what exercises give me personally, the fastest gains, and the reps/sets/ etc to maximise that for me, that helps gain fast.
But the CNS is a really good topic, because it has a huge bearing on how effectively we recuperate from training. Cheers
I am sorry, but "feels" =/= actual results. You are making an assumption rather than making a statement based on actual data. Is there potential that you did gain some muscle? Maybe. But you don't have data to support your actual position. You have no clue if it was muscle gains, increase in blood flow (make you look pump), fat loss, muscle loss, etc...
I am glad you like what you see and have accomplished, but that in no way means you have data to support your position.
Thats the problem here on this forum. You have to have data, proof, verification. Experience means nothing! What you see in the mirror, its subjective, weights in the gym going up, oh just nervous energy, bigger biceps, oh thats easy...pump. I cant believe this. Ive been training for 45 years, 4 years as a competitive bodybuilder and you learn alot doing that. I have way more than just a "clue". You can have your science and data, I'll keep my results!
Is it a problem with the forum?
The root problem is that you are attempting to persuade, but the audience wants evidence. You can either blame the want or adapt and overcome by providing evidence.
Not the whole forum but in general a toeing of the line that science, data, analysis, is only what counts, and if you cant prove what youre saying that way, your results are deemed invalid or at least unbelievable and bad advice. Science does not have all the answers.
The human body is so complex I dont believe science will ever know it all. Scientists often cant even all agree on even which methodology produces the most accurate results. its not that I believe science is wrong on everything, I just dont believe it knows enough to be right on everything. So therefore I am sceptical of scientific theories that are not fully proven nor fully endorsed by the whole scientific community. Im offering a different viewpoint to what is pushed here. One that recognises real life cases, personal experience, years competing, owning gyms and training and observing people wanting to improve. Call it broscience if you like but the bros just keep coming out of the gym looking great.
Heres something to throw out there for comment and comparison, no right or wrongs, but interesting to hear what people think. Diet quality is about 10% of results in the gym. Supplements (like protein shakes, vitamins) not worth listing. Program about 20%. Psychology (motivation,dedication,determination etc) 20%, lifting and intensity 30%, rest and recuperation 20%. And if diet is only 10 or 15% of the equation why do we spend 90% of the time on this forum talking about it
Because it is 90% diet.10 -
Heres something to throw out there for comment and comparison, no right or wrongs, but interesting to hear what people think. Diet quality is about 10% of results in the gym. Supplements (like protein shakes, vitamins) not worth listing. Program about 20%. Psychology (motivation,dedication,determination etc) 20%, lifting and intensity 30%, rest and recuperation 20%. And if diet is only 10 or 15% of the equation why do we spend 90% of the time on this forum talking about it
Quote a reference source for those numbers - or are they just based on your feelings too? These come from a book written by a published researcher with a PhD in Exercise Science, who is also a competitive bodybuilder and powerlifter:
5 -
I have no means of measuring except I feel and see the difference, when I flex, my shape and overall bulk after a 15 pound loss, and I have done this many times before. But It may be I have only put 1 pound on because I havent been doing any heavy leg work. If so, that pound has gone a long way.
Its not just CNS strength gain. I cant quantify how much I think is strength gain, but its no where near as much as the muscle size gain. Perhaps too, because I know what exercises give me personally, the fastest gains, and the reps/sets/ etc to maximise that for me, that helps gain fast.
But the CNS is a really good topic, because it has a huge bearing on how effectively we recuperate from training. Cheers
I am sorry, but "feels" =/= actual results. You are making an assumption rather than making a statement based on actual data. Is there potential that you did gain some muscle? Maybe. But you don't have data to support your actual position. You have no clue if it was muscle gains, increase in blood flow (make you look pump), fat loss, muscle loss, etc...
I am glad you like what you see and have accomplished, but that in no way means you have data to support your position.
Thats the problem here on this forum. You have to have data, proof, verification. Experience means nothing! What you see in the mirror, its subjective, weights in the gym going up, oh just nervous energy, bigger biceps, oh thats easy...pump. I cant believe this. Ive been training for 45 years, 4 years as a competitive bodybuilder and you learn alot doing that. I have way more than just a "clue". You can have your science and data, I'll keep my results!
Is it a problem with the forum?
The root problem is that you are attempting to persuade, but the audience wants evidence. You can either blame the want or adapt and overcome by providing evidence.
Not the whole forum but in general a toeing of the line that science, data, analysis, is only what counts, and if you cant prove what youre saying that way, your results are deemed invalid or at least unbelievable and bad advice. Science does not have all the answers.
The human body is so complex I dont believe science will ever know it all. Scientists often cant even all agree on even which methodology produces the most accurate results. its not that I believe science is wrong on everything, I just dont believe it knows enough to be right on everything. So therefore I am sceptical of scientific theories that are not fully proven nor fully endorsed by the whole scientific community. Im offering a different viewpoint to what is pushed here. One that recognises real life cases, personal experience, years competing, owning gyms and training and observing people wanting to improve. Call it broscience if you like but the bros just keep coming out of the gym looking great.
Heres something to throw out there for comment and comparison, no right or wrongs, but interesting to hear what people think. Diet quality is about 10% of results in the gym. Supplements (like protein shakes, vitamins) not worth listing. Program about 20%. Psychology (motivation,dedication,determination etc) 20%, lifting and intensity 30%, rest and recuperation 20%. And if diet is only 10 or 15% of the equation why do we spend 90% of the time on this forum talking about it
Let's pretend for just a second that your numbers here are accurate (which I doubt). At the end of the day, I suspect the number of MFP users who are interested in reaching maximum gains in the gym are less than half. Which would make this kind of advice irrelevant for a considerable number of MFP users.10 -
I have no means of measuring except I feel and see the difference, when I flex, my shape and overall bulk after a 15 pound loss, and I have done this many times before. But It may be I have only put 1 pound on because I havent been doing any heavy leg work. If so, that pound has gone a long way.
Its not just CNS strength gain. I cant quantify how much I think is strength gain, but its no where near as much as the muscle size gain. Perhaps too, because I know what exercises give me personally, the fastest gains, and the reps/sets/ etc to maximise that for me, that helps gain fast.
But the CNS is a really good topic, because it has a huge bearing on how effectively we recuperate from training. Cheers
I am sorry, but "feels" =/= actual results. You are making an assumption rather than making a statement based on actual data. Is there potential that you did gain some muscle? Maybe. But you don't have data to support your actual position. You have no clue if it was muscle gains, increase in blood flow (make you look pump), fat loss, muscle loss, etc...
I am glad you like what you see and have accomplished, but that in no way means you have data to support your position.
Thats the problem here on this forum. You have to have data, proof, verification. Experience means nothing! What you see in the mirror, its subjective, weights in the gym going up, oh just nervous energy, bigger biceps, oh thats easy...pump. I cant believe this. Ive been training for 45 years, 4 years as a competitive bodybuilder and you learn alot doing that. I have way more than just a "clue". You can have your science and data, I'll keep my results!
Is it a problem with the forum?
The root problem is that you are attempting to persuade, but the audience wants evidence. You can either blame the want or adapt and overcome by providing evidence.
Not the whole forum but in general a toeing of the line that science, data, analysis, is only what counts, and if you cant prove what youre saying that way, your results are deemed invalid or at least unbelievable and bad advice. Science does not have all the answers.
The human body is so complex I dont believe science will ever know it all. Scientists often cant even all agree on even which methodology produces the most accurate results. its not that I believe science is wrong on everything, I just dont believe it knows enough to be right on everything. So therefore I am sceptical of scientific theories that are not fully proven nor fully endorsed by the whole scientific community. Im offering a different viewpoint to what is pushed here. One that recognises real life cases, personal experience, years competing, owning gyms and training and observing people wanting to improve. Call it broscience if you like but the bros just keep coming out of the gym looking great.
Heres something to throw out there for comment and comparison, no right or wrongs, but interesting to hear what people think. Diet quality is about 10% of results in the gym. Supplements (like protein shakes, vitamins) not worth listing. Program about 20%. Psychology (motivation,dedication,determination etc) 20%, lifting and intensity 30%, rest and recuperation 20%. And if diet is only 10 or 15% of the equation why do we spend 90% of the time on this forum talking about it
Without data, you are just making crap up. You are equivalently telling people to just trust what you are saying. That is the same line as those who tout MLM supplements, AVC, etc...
You may be fine with trusting anybody who tells you something, but i am not. I like data and science where possible. When its not I look at trusted leaders in the field to provide guidance based on experience.
Also, when people make dataless claims, it can give false hope to many noobs. I like to set realistic expectations to those who are new to dieting and training.15 -
-
I have no means of measuring except I feel and see the difference, when I flex, my shape and overall bulk after a 15 pound loss, and I have done this many times before. But It may be I have only put 1 pound on because I havent been doing any heavy leg work. If so, that pound has gone a long way.
Its not just CNS strength gain. I cant quantify how much I think is strength gain, but its no where near as much as the muscle size gain. Perhaps too, because I know what exercises give me personally, the fastest gains, and the reps/sets/ etc to maximise that for me, that helps gain fast.
But the CNS is a really good topic, because it has a huge bearing on how effectively we recuperate from training. Cheers
I am sorry, but "feels" =/= actual results. You are making an assumption rather than making a statement based on actual data. Is there potential that you did gain some muscle? Maybe. But you don't have data to support your actual position. You have no clue if it was muscle gains, increase in blood flow (make you look pump), fat loss, muscle loss, etc...
I am glad you like what you see and have accomplished, but that in no way means you have data to support your position.
Thats the problem here on this forum. You have to have data, proof, verification. Experience means nothing! What you see in the mirror, its subjective, weights in the gym going up, oh just nervous energy, bigger biceps, oh thats easy...pump. I cant believe this. Ive been training for 45 years, 4 years as a competitive bodybuilder and you learn alot doing that. I have way more than just a "clue". You can have your science and data, I'll keep my results!
Is it a problem with the forum?
The root problem is that you are attempting to persuade, but the audience wants evidence. You can either blame the want or adapt and overcome by providing evidence.
Not the whole forum but in general a toeing of the line that science, data, analysis, is only what counts, and if you cant prove what youre saying that way, your results are deemed invalid or at least unbelievable and bad advice. Science does not have all the answers.
The human body is so complex I dont believe science will ever know it all. Scientists often cant even all agree on even which methodology produces the most accurate results. its not that I believe science is wrong on everything, I just dont believe it knows enough to be right on everything. So therefore I am sceptical of scientific theories that are not fully proven nor fully endorsed by the whole scientific community. Im offering a different viewpoint to what is pushed here. One that recognises real life cases, personal experience, years competing, owning gyms and training and observing people wanting to improve. Call it broscience if you like but the bros just keep coming out of the gym looking great.
Heres something to throw out there for comment and comparison, no right or wrongs, but interesting to hear what people think. Diet quality is about 10% of results in the gym. Supplements (like protein shakes, vitamins) not worth listing. Program about 20%. Psychology (motivation,dedication,determination etc) 20%, lifting and intensity 30%, rest and recuperation 20%. And if diet is only 10 or 15% of the equation why do we spend 90% of the time on this forum talking about it
You're speaking past the evidence in an attempt to be right. Is it effective? Adopting fact based evidence to support facts, challenge and evolving beyond personal bias is extremely effective. There's a primal resonance when truth is spoken.
No one is claiming that science has all the answers. This is a strawman. Science is simply a process for testing, reprocibility and fact finding.
The body may be complex, but not for the topic at hand. Rather simple actually. Your viewpoint may be correct, but why not back it with evidence and serve both yourself and your audience?
You're also discussing a very different goal in this than the average person simply seeking to go from 30% bodyfat to 17%. For this diet quality is almost meaningless. From personal studies and a few other people on the forums I'm starting to question that quality is ever a meaningful variable. Diet quality only becomes a concern when other risks are minimized, so these arbitrary percentages are going to be varying wildly based upon the present status of the individual and their health goals.
6 -
I see there are some differences of opinions on the value of mega data studies and n=1 studies.
Metlife sales life insurance let us say and they research the factors that go into determining our longevity. They can be quite sure of when on average we will expire within one standard deviation. What they do not know is when any one of their clients will die.
We can look at studies showing how Keto can work very well for many people on average.
In the end the insurance types are no happy just knowing our average life expectancy but want to know our n=1 life expectancy. As a matter of fact they price life insurance based on detailed health examples or our n=1 exam.
If one need control values in benchmarking their n=1 one can just grab it from the mega data studies.
Broad based research can give us a hint of the WOE's that may work well for us. n=1 results are were we get the specific knowledge as to the best way for us to eat.
12 -
L1zardQueen wrote: »I have no means of measuring except I feel and see the difference, when I flex, my shape and overall bulk after a 15 pound loss, and I have done this many times before. But It may be I have only put 1 pound on because I havent been doing any heavy leg work. If so, that pound has gone a long way.
Its not just CNS strength gain. I cant quantify how much I think is strength gain, but its no where near as much as the muscle size gain. Perhaps too, because I know what exercises give me personally, the fastest gains, and the reps/sets/ etc to maximise that for me, that helps gain fast.
But the CNS is a really good topic, because it has a huge bearing on how effectively we recuperate from training. Cheers
I am sorry, but "feels" =/= actual results. You are making an assumption rather than making a statement based on actual data. Is there potential that you did gain some muscle? Maybe. But you don't have data to support your actual position. You have no clue if it was muscle gains, increase in blood flow (make you look pump), fat loss, muscle loss, etc...
I am glad you like what you see and have accomplished, but that in no way means you have data to support your position.
Thats the problem here on this forum. You have to have data, proof, verification. Experience means nothing! What you see in the mirror, its subjective, weights in the gym going up, oh just nervous energy, bigger biceps, oh thats easy...pump. I cant believe this. Ive been training for 45 years, 4 years as a competitive bodybuilder and you learn alot doing that. I have way more than just a "clue". You can have your science and data, I'll keep my results!
Is it a problem with the forum?
The root problem is that you are attempting to persuade, but the audience wants evidence. You can either blame the want or adapt and overcome by providing evidence.
Not the whole forum but in general a toeing of the line that science, data, analysis, is only what counts, and if you cant prove what youre saying that way, your results are deemed invalid or at least unbelievable and bad advice. Science does not have all the answers.
The human body is so complex I dont believe science will ever know it all. Scientists often cant even all agree on even which methodology produces the most accurate results. its not that I believe science is wrong on everything, I just dont believe it knows enough to be right on everything. So therefore I am sceptical of scientific theories that are not fully proven nor fully endorsed by the whole scientific community. Im offering a different viewpoint to what is pushed here. One that recognises real life cases, personal experience, years competing, owning gyms and training and observing people wanting to improve. Call it broscience if you like but the bros just keep coming out of the gym looking great.
Heres something to throw out there for comment and comparison, no right or wrongs, but interesting to hear what people think. Diet quality is about 10% of results in the gym. Supplements (like protein shakes, vitamins) not worth listing. Program about 20%. Psychology (motivation,dedication,determination etc) 20%, lifting and intensity 30%, rest and recuperation 20%. And if diet is only 10 or 15% of the equation why do we spend 90% of the time on this forum talking about it
Because it is 90% diet.
Good answer. It depends on what you want to achieve however. Eventually, when you you lose the weight, gain the weight, fat probably for both, you want shape, and thats where weight training wins. Muscle gives shape, fat gives bulk, unshapely bulk.2 -
Oh boy, theres too many questions. Just show me your before and after pics, I mean, just to back up a little of what your knowledge and experience has produced!
By the way, I like Eric Helms, I just dont get those diagrams. And tell me what you think the mix of results is, instead of saying " Let's pretend for just a second that your numbers here are accurate (which I doubt)".
Has anyone really trained here or is this just a (mostly) diet and exercise forum. Im honestly wondering.
7 -
Okay, first you need to know how the keto diet originated. In the olden days (1920's and such), there were no drugs to treat epilepsy. So the physicians used to prescribe Keto diet (yes, the exact same one you are talking about) as a treatment. The ketone bodies that are generated actually cause changes in the brain chemistry to slow it down. Because many of the subjects also lost weight while on this diet, the diet became a fad.
Now, while for people with epilepsy, that is a good thing (because their brain impulses are hyperactive and keto brings them in a normal range) but for normal people, it will slow down the normal functioning of the brain. Consider what would happen if people who don't have diabetes started taking insulin. (Though keto doesn't cause as immediate and as life-threatening changes as insulin overload).That is also a big part of why people feel lethargic. And the effects of keto diet on the brain chemistry of normal people has not been well studied. It is also not known if there are any permanent effects.
There is another state in which ketosis is produced - diabetes. Because of the lack of insulin, people with diabetes are unable to process carbs. This is why the body switches to fat metabolism and produces ketones. But the high amount of ketones produces severe stomach cramps, vomiting, delirium and even coma. Now, in a keto diet that would not be possible because you are eating some carbs and you will have natural cravings and desire to eat and not eat certain foods. The same 100% no carb only fat environment is hard to replicate. However, you can have milder versions of side effects like stomach pains, confusion, lethargy, nausea, diarrhoea etc. But this will give you an idea that a body running only on fat isn't such a good thing.
I am not trying to scare you but I believe you should have all the info.
Moreover, Keto claims that its main benefit is to make your body burn fat instead of carbs. It also cites some study that found that ketones are more efficiently used by the body than carbs for producing energy. However, our bodies are ingenious machines. If our bodies have been made to run on carbs, it is for a reason. Mere efficiency is not the criteria. The side effects (as mentioned above) also need to be taken into account.
Sometimes people say that we are born into ketosis so, I don't know, it is automatically better? When we are born we have fetal form of blood and muscle tissue. But the same kind in adults causes diseases and slows down movement.
Moreover, there are some systems in our body that run on carbs - like the anaerobic system which cannot work on ketones.
Another thing, theoretically you could eat only gummy bears, maintain calories and lose weight. However, you wouldn't do that right? Then why go overboard with fat and protein-laden foods. Many of the keto foods are extremely unhealthy because of the way they are made and because they are very high in fat (especially unhealthy fats).
Also, if you don't count calories on the keto diet, you can easily go overboard as keto foods are very very very high in calories. But if you count calories, that would mean that you would be starving all day long, especially since dense calorie-packed foods will have very small portions for that calorie allowance. This mostly why keto followers struggle.
Moreover, you have to see what is your priority. Do you just want to lose weight or do you want to be healthy? These are different things. Because being healthy means having a good cardio-resp strength, a good heart, no fatty liver, no cholesterol in your arteries, strong bones and muscles, strong ligaments (need protein and calcium) , a good mental health (exercise and healthy foods help a lot with that), proper vitamins for healthy blood, functioning of the body, proper vitamins for skin regeneration so that the flaps of skin are absorbed once you lose weight and much much more. Keto will not give you that. In fact, keto works in the opposite direction of many of these things.
Also, it becomes very very hard for some people to exercise while on keto. Some can manage, many can't. And exercise But it is up to you to decide.
Moreover, diets never work. Whenever you stop them, the weight comes back. If you want to lose weight and keep it off you should never follow a diet. Instead, you should make permanent changes to your eating habits and menu that will stay with you for the rest of your life. These habits have to be sustainable in the long term and compatible with your routine. If you think that keto is something you can follow until the day you die, go for it. But many people are not able to do that.
Keto will also deprive you of many essential vitamins and minerals found in different kinds of foods. While you can take supplements for some vitamins, there are so many micronutrients and antioxidants that man has not yet been able to extract and formulate into capsules. Which is why it is always better to take them from a natural source, instead of from supplements. But then again, it depends on your priorities.
While many people swear by keto because they could maintain it and they got results, there are also many people who swear by the fact that a moderate, mindful, permanent food habit modification by including all kinds of food in moderation produces the same results. The basic formula is calorie in < calorie out. For a difference of every 3500 cals, you lose a pound. You could do that on a gummy bear diet, a purple diet, a keto diet or a well-rounded diet. The key is to follow the diet that you can stick with for the rest of your life. Eg. I have a sweet tooth. If I deprive myself sweets for very long, I end up bingeing. The forbidden fruit is so much sweeter. Therefore, even though I would like protein to be in a little higher percentage, I still add something sweet every day to my menu while maintaining the calories because I cannot deprive myself of sweets till the day I die.
And as for the fat burning benefit of keto goes, let me break it down. Any kind of food habit where you are eating less than you are burning is taking energy from fat, period. While it is true that the body can burn muscle, it tends to burn fat. Moreover, you can add weight training and HIIT and good protein to maintain muscle tissue.
There are also many ways you can drive up the fat burn - eg HIIT training without energy drinks and in a calorie deficit, fasting cardio etc. These are much easier to follow than a keto diet and have less damaging effects o your body.
Ultimately, I would say that consistency is key. If you cannot stick with a food and exercise routine forever, don't start it. Every time you start it and fail, it reinforces a negative attitude towards fitness and weight management. You feel like a failure and that feeling, in turn, causes you to fail and the loop continues. So do it once, do right and do it forever. Pick the thing that you can follow forever and stick with it. Don't care if everyone around you is snuffing honey or lemons or whatever to lose weight. If keto works, go with that, if you think you can stick with paleo, go with that, if you think well rounded moderate diet is it, go with that. And start making the changes slowly. You wouldn't run 10 miles, do 100 pushups, 500 squats and lift weight for hours on the first day you decide to exercise. You would start slow - maybe 30 mins of light to moderate cardio, 10 pushups and 10 squats and maybe 10 mins of weightlifting and then adjust it as you go. So should be your food modification.
I hope this long ramble helped.
7 -
Are our bodies "made to run on carbs". I think protein. Maybe a long time ago we ate berries, and hunted for meat, probably quite fatty, which constituted a large part of the diet back then. Im assuming though. Im on low carb. Protein in the form of eggs and meat is high on my list every day.8
-
Sorry, the body is made to run on either carbs or fats, the brain runs on fats!6
-
Sorry, the body is made to run on either carbs or fats, the brain runs on fats!
Incorrect. The brain's preferred fuel source is glucose (carbs) - to the point that if there isn't glucose present, fats will be converted to carbs (gluconeogenesis) to power the brain, or ketones will be produced in the liver and used as fuel in the absence of glucose.9 -
Sorry, the body is made to run on either carbs or fats, the brain runs on fats!
Incorrect. The brain's preferred fuel source is glucose (carbs) - to the point that if there isn't glucose present, fats will be converted to carbs (gluconeogenesis) to power the brain, or ketones will be produced in the liver and used as fuel in the absence of glucose.
Exactly. It's a last resort sort of fuel, a survival mechanism so we survive as long as possible in the event of a famine. When both carbs and fats are available, the brain will preferentially use glucose.7 -
Oh boy, theres too many questions. Just show me your before and after pics, I mean, just to back up a little of what your knowledge and experience has produced!
By the way, I like Eric Helms, I just dont get those diagrams. And tell me what you think the mix of results is, instead of saying " Let's pretend for just a second that your numbers here are accurate (which I doubt)".
Has anyone really trained here or is this just a (mostly) diet and exercise forum. Im honestly wondering.
The pyramids discuss the prioritization of importance... energy balance > macros > micros > timing > supplementation. Lower parts of the pyramid are the "foundation" of diet or training.
And yes, many of us have trained and/or continue to train. If you want to see that, go in the bodybuilding section and you will see several threads. Some compete, others don't.9 -
Are our bodies "made to run on carbs". I think protein. Maybe a long time ago we ate berries, and hunted for meat, probably quite fatty, which constituted a large part of the diet back then. Im assuming though. Im on low carb. Protein in the form of eggs and meat is high on my list every day.
It's pretty well established that protein is not a good source of energy. Fat and carbs are preferred sources.6 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »I see there are some differences of opinions on the value of mega data studies and n=1 studies.
Metlife sales life insurance let us say and they research the factors that go into determining our longevity. They can be quite sure of when on average we will expire within one standard deviation. What they do not know is when any one of their clients will die.
We can look at studies showing how Keto can work very well for many people on average.
In the end the insurance types are no happy just knowing our average life expectancy but want to know our n=1 life expectancy. As a matter of fact they price life insurance based on detailed health examples or our n=1 exam.
If one need control values in benchmarking their n=1 one can just grab it from the mega data studies.
Broad based research can give us a hint of the WOE's that may work well for us. n=1 results are were we get the specific knowledge as to the best way for us to eat.
Posts like this convince me that we need a diary entry for word salad.
13 -
OMG, so much misinformation going around.
1. As someone rightly pointed out, our brains primarily run on glucose exclusively. The only other thing they can run on is ketones. But like I said, that is unnatural and a fail-safe mechanism to protect the brain during starvation. Ketones, unlike glucose, end up producing confusion and lethargy in the brain.
2. If we ate berries in the past, we also ate the meat of hunted animals. In fact, today we have more carb loaded and highly processed food floating in the market than before the industrial era. So if someone up in the comments was trying to make a point that somehow our bodies have evolved to run on more protein, it makes no sense. There is more carb-rich food in many diets than ever before. Next, your thinking does not determine what the body functions on. Protein is used for muscle building, immunity and for hormones etc. That is building up of the body. However, for fuelling or running the body, that is products that are broken down to provide energy, the order is carbs > fat > other sources > protein as per the preference of the body. Though it is true that all 4 kinds can be burnt at any point but the amount is more often in the same ratio as mentioned above in a person with zero calorie deficit. When in a calorie deficit, fat takes over as the primary fuel source as carbs are not always available in the blood from food in that situation. Just because bodybuilders have been drilled to chug protein does not mean that our bodies have started running on protein somehow.
3. And when we say fat is used or protein is used for energy, it doesn't mean fat is burnt directly. All 3 components are interconvertible in our body. Fat is first converted to carbs with ketones and water as by-products. The carbs and ketones are then used for various processes. Same happens with proteins. So yes, our bodies and minds (irrespective of your unfounded beliefs) still primarily run on carbs unless there is something drastically changed like a keto diet, diabetic ketosis etc. Even then, they are using fat to make carbs and ketones as by-products are also used because the body is wise enough to prevent wastage in a calorie deficit.5 -
Thanks for posting this!! I am new to keto and found this information helpful. I am also looking for keto friends.. Please add me if your following a keto diet.. 😀1
-
Thanks for posting this!! I am new to keto and found this information helpful. I am also looking for keto friends.. Please add me if your following a keto diet.. 😀
Welcome to the Keto Way Of Eating.
4 years ago at the the age of 63 with serious health issues I cut out food with added sugar and or any forms of any grains on a hunch for pain management. It worked in the first 30 days and over the past 4 years the MD is no longer treating me for any issues. She said I will see you next year in the meantime keep doing what you have been doing for the past several years. Last year she was concerned about my high Vitamin D3 because I am taking 50,000 units daily. She said since all of my labs we OK she was okay with my 155+ ng levels since science has not determined what level is too high. I don't promote mega dosing of Any thing. Having an earned OD degree most MD's simle at my n=1 experiments since they know they have no accountable due to my healtcare training.
My body runs better on ketones than glucose for some reason.
Best of continued success.15 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »[Having an earned OD degree
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority#Appeal_to_non-authorities
An OD degree does not make you an authority on anything except optometry. When that degree was earned over 30 years ago and you never practiced or even completed residency, even less so.
11 -
Demander2015 wrote: »Okay, first you need to know how the keto diet originated. In the olden days (1920's and such), there were no drugs to treat epilepsy. So the physicians used to prescribe Keto diet (yes, the exact same one you are talking about) as a treatment. The ketone bodies that are generated actually cause changes in the brain chemistry to slow it down. Because many of the subjects also lost weight while on this diet, the diet became a fad.
Now, while for people with epilepsy, that is a good thing (because their brain impulses are hyperactive and keto brings them in a normal range) but for normal people, it will slow down the normal functioning of the brain. Consider what would happen if people who don't have diabetes started taking insulin. (Though keto doesn't cause as immediate and as life-threatening changes as insulin overload).That is also a big part of why people feel lethargic. And the effects of keto diet on the brain chemistry of normal people has not been well studied. It is also not known if there are any permanent effects.
There is another state in which ketosis is produced - diabetes. Because of the lack of insulin, people with diabetes are unable to process carbs. This is why the body switches to fat metabolism and produces ketones. But the high amount of ketones produces severe stomach cramps, vomiting, delirium and even coma. Now, in a keto diet that would not be possible because you are eating some carbs and you will have natural cravings and desire to eat and not eat certain foods. The same 100% no carb only fat environment is hard to replicate. However, you can have milder versions of side effects like stomach pains, confusion, lethargy, nausea, diarrhoea etc. But this will give you an idea that a body running only on fat isn't such a good thing.
I am not trying to scare you but I believe you should have all the info.
Moreover, Keto claims that its main benefit is to make your body burn fat instead of carbs. It also cites some study that found that ketones are more efficiently used by the body than carbs for producing energy. However, our bodies are ingenious machines. If our bodies have been made to run on carbs, it is for a reason. Mere efficiency is not the criteria. The side effects (as mentioned above) also need to be taken into account.
Sometimes people say that we are born into ketosis so, I don't know, it is automatically better? When we are born we have fetal form of blood and muscle tissue. But the same kind in adults causes diseases and slows down movement.
Moreover, there are some systems in our body that run on carbs - like the anaerobic system which cannot work on ketones.
Another thing, theoretically you could eat only gummy bears, maintain calories and lose weight. However, you wouldn't do that right? Then why go overboard with fat and protein-laden foods. Many of the keto foods are extremely unhealthy because of the way they are made and because they are very high in fat (especially unhealthy fats).
Also, if you don't count calories on the keto diet, you can easily go overboard as keto foods are very very very high in calories. But if you count calories, that would mean that you would be starving all day long, especially since dense calorie-packed foods will have very small portions for that calorie allowance. This mostly why keto followers struggle.
Moreover, you have to see what is your priority. Do you just want to lose weight or do you want to be healthy? These are different things. Because being healthy means having a good cardio-resp strength, a good heart, no fatty liver, no cholesterol in your arteries, strong bones and muscles, strong ligaments (need protein and calcium) , a good mental health (exercise and healthy foods help a lot with that), proper vitamins for healthy blood, functioning of the body, proper vitamins for skin regeneration so that the flaps of skin are absorbed once you lose weight and much much more. Keto will not give you that. In fact, keto works in the opposite direction of many of these things.
Also, it becomes very very hard for some people to exercise while on keto. Some can manage, many can't. And exercise But it is up to you to decide.
Moreover, diets never work. Whenever you stop them, the weight comes back. If you want to lose weight and keep it off you should never follow a diet. Instead, you should make permanent changes to your eating habits and menu that will stay with you for the rest of your life. These habits have to be sustainable in the long term and compatible with your routine. If you think that keto is something you can follow until the day you die, go for it. But many people are not able to do that.
Keto will also deprive you of many essential vitamins and minerals found in different kinds of foods. While you can take supplements for some vitamins, there are so many micronutrients and antioxidants that man has not yet been able to extract and formulate into capsules. Which is why it is always better to take them from a natural source, instead of from supplements. But then again, it depends on your priorities.
While many people swear by keto because they could maintain it and they got results, there are also many people who swear by the fact that a moderate, mindful, permanent food habit modification by including all kinds of food in moderation produces the same results. The basic formula is calorie in < calorie out. For a difference of every 3500 cals, you lose a pound. You could do that on a gummy bear diet, a purple diet, a keto diet or a well-rounded diet. The key is to follow the diet that you can stick with for the rest of your life. Eg. I have a sweet tooth. If I deprive myself sweets for very long, I end up bingeing. The forbidden fruit is so much sweeter. Therefore, even though I would like protein to be in a little higher percentage, I still add something sweet every day to my menu while maintaining the calories because I cannot deprive myself of sweets till the day I die.
And as for the fat burning benefit of keto goes, let me break it down. Any kind of food habit where you are eating less than you are burning is taking energy from fat, period. While it is true that the body can burn muscle, it tends to burn fat. Moreover, you can add weight training and HIIT and good protein to maintain muscle tissue.
There are also many ways you can drive up the fat burn - eg HIIT training without energy drinks and in a calorie deficit, fasting cardio etc. These are much easier to follow than a keto diet and have less damaging effects o your body.
Ultimately, I would say that consistency is key. If you cannot stick with a food and exercise routine forever, don't start it. Every time you start it and fail, it reinforces a negative attitude towards fitness and weight management. You feel like a failure and that feeling, in turn, causes you to fail and the loop continues. So do it once, do right and do it forever. Pick the thing that you can follow forever and stick with it. Don't care if everyone around you is snuffing honey or lemons or whatever to lose weight. If keto works, go with that, if you think you can stick with paleo, go with that, if you think well rounded moderate diet is it, go with that. And start making the changes slowly. You wouldn't run 10 miles, do 100 pushups, 500 squats and lift weight for hours on the first day you decide to exercise. You would start slow - maybe 30 mins of light to moderate cardio, 10 pushups and 10 squats and maybe 10 mins of weightlifting and then adjust it as you go. So should be your food modification.
I hope this long ramble helped.
people with diabetes CAN process carbs so that is bunk, how much carbs they can eat vary person to person. many here have had diabetes or have diabetes and eat carbs and are managing their insulin just fine eating carbs. I think you are confusing keto with ketoacidosis which are two different things. the lethargy and other symptoms that come from keto happen because you deplete your body of water,glycogen and electrolytes as well which is why you get the keto flu. which is why its suggested to up the sodium,magnesium and potassium when doing keto to prevent that. and for most it works.
as for people who arent diabetic and inject insulin there are people like that and not sure if they still do it but many body builders use to inject insulin to build muscle.
as for counting calories on keto you are not going to starve and deprive yourself. how is eating say 1500 or more calories(depending on person yet again) starving? and eating too many by not counting means youre eating too many calories and will gain which is said of any way of eating.exercise is also NOT needed for weight loss, but it helps how your body looks and it is good for your heart,muscles,etc.
as for fat burning your body burns fat in a deficit whether keto or not and your body will also burn carbs(glycogen) for energy. it will burn muscle if it doesnt have enough calories,fasting cardio or any other exercise fasting hasnt proven to burn any more fat than fasted exertcise. keto was done for epileptics but but it has been proven useful for those with type 2,pcos,insulin resistance and some other health issues are now being studied to see how keto works for that health issue.
Im not diabetic and will say keto nearly did me in due to another health issue I have. But thats my experience.2 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »Thanks for posting this!! I am new to keto and found this information helpful. I am also looking for keto friends.. Please add me if your following a keto diet.. 😀
Welcome to the Keto Way Of Eating.
4 years ago at the the age of 63 with serious health issues I cut out food with added sugar and or any forms of any grains on a hunch for pain management. It worked in the first 30 days and over the past 4 years the MD is no longer treating me for any issues. She said I will see you next year in the meantime keep doing what you have been doing for the past several years. Last year she was concerned about my high Vitamin D3 because I am taking 50,000 units daily. She said since all of my labs we OK she was okay with my 155+ ng levels since science has not determined what level is too high. I don't promote mega dosing of Any thing. Having an earned OD degree most MD's simle at my n=1 experiments since they know they have no accountable due to my healtcare training.
My body runs better on ketones than glucose for some reason.
Best of continued success.
Yes, there is a clear upper limit of normal for VitD levels; most labs have >-100ng/mL as the upper limit of normal. Here are some potential complications you & your MD seem to be ignoring:
"Serious Reactions
hypervitaminosis D
hypercalcemia
hypercalciuria
nephrotoxicity
hyperphosphatemia
Common Reactions
hypercalcemia
Cr elevated
hypercalciuria
nausea
vomiting
anorexia
polyuria
anemia
weakness
renal impairment"
(Epocrates). Not the wisest decision in combination with ketosis (kidney stones)
Given your level of "expertise", I nominate you King of Woos. Vit D dose you are taking is pretty insane (hint: I'm not joking about this..: l ). Just bolded some of your wording to emphasize your ignorance of science15 -
I dont understand why there is such negativity towards this WOE3
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions