Everywhere shrinks but lower belly

Kales97
Kales97 Posts: 10 Member
edited May 2019 in Health and Weight Loss
I’m down 22 lbs since March 1st. (I’m 5’8 & 175 lbs). I’ve gone down from size 12 to size 10 in jeans but my lower belly stays the same! 😭 Is there something specific I should be doing to lose the fat there? Or is this all genetic? It drives me crazy that the pouch still stays. (I’ve included a photo).
«1

Replies

  • This content has been removed.
  • mmapags
    mmapags Posts: 8,934 Member
    You've done great and come a long way. Keep it up as you still have some body fat to lose.
  • mmapags
    mmapags Posts: 8,934 Member
    pilia13 wrote: »
    If you are not working out at the gym, it will be hard to lose that. I’d suggest trying that if you haven’t already. Congratulations on the weight loss, 23 lbs is awesome!

    While exercise is great for health, fat loss is all about calorie deficit.
  • CharlieCharlie007
    CharlieCharlie007 Posts: 246 Member
    Lower belly is the real *kitten*. It truly is the last to go. I am at 9.2% bf, I still have 6 centimeters to go. because of my body type. MY dietitian calculated with her formulas that for me to see abszzzz, I need to go to 5.7%. Now, that sounds ridiculously low, but, I am putting on 1.2 pounds of muscle for every pound on fat I drop. So, My weight is actually the same or a bit higher. But, losing everywhere. So, do not lose faith. Stay consistent, stay in the game, and you will achieve the desired results. Just have a realistic timeline.
  • mmapags
    mmapags Posts: 8,934 Member
    Lower belly is the real *kitten*. It truly is the last to go. I am at 9.2% bf, I still have 6 centimeters to go. because of my body type. MY dietitian calculated with her formulas that for me to see abszzzz, I need to go to 5.7%. Now, that sounds ridiculously low, but, I am putting on 1.2 pounds of muscle for every pound on fat I drop. So, My weight is actually the same or a bit higher. But, losing everywhere. So, do not lose faith. Stay consistent, stay in the game, and you will achieve the desired results. Just have a realistic timeline.

    For many people that is true. I carry the last reserve of fat over my hips toward the back above my glutes. I can have a flat belly and extra fat there and it is the hardest to make disappear.
  • try2again
    try2again Posts: 3,562 Member
    edited May 2019
    pilia13 wrote: »
    If you are not working out at the gym, it will be hard to lose that. I’d suggest trying that if you haven’t already. Congratulations on the weight loss, 23 lbs is awesome!

    I guess I don't know what kind of workout you have in mind here- be it weight lifting or some kind of cardio- but weight lifting doesn't get rid of fat, it just makes things nice and toned underneath (which is great :) ). No workout specifically targets fat, except in the sense that it may help achieve the calorie deficit necessary to burn fat overall. In fact, a person wouldn't have to work out at all to do that, but the aesthetics will be much better.
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    try2again wrote: »
    pilia13 wrote: »
    If you are not working out at the gym, it will be hard to lose that. I’d suggest trying that if you haven’t already. Congratulations on the weight loss, 23 lbs is awesome!

    I guess I don't know what kind of workout you have in mind here- be it weight lifting or some kind of cardio- but weight lifting doesn't get rid of fat, it just makes things nice and toned underneath (which is great :) ). No workout specifically targets fat, except in the sense that it may help achieve the calorie deficit necessary to burn fat overall. In fact, a person wouldn't have to work out at all to do that, but the aesthetics will be much better.

    No, but lifting helps you retain muscle as you lose, otherwise, you lose fat and muscle, making it harder to look how you want.

    If your goal was to lose 10 lbs but didn't lift, you may lose 4 lbs of lbm and 6 fat, which would look different than if your lost 10, 8 of which is fat. That extra 2 lbs of fat loss makes a difference from a bf% standpoint
  • try2again
    try2again Posts: 3,562 Member
    edited May 2019
    erickirb wrote: »
    try2again wrote: »
    pilia13 wrote: »
    If you are not working out at the gym, it will be hard to lose that. I’d suggest trying that if you haven’t already. Congratulations on the weight loss, 23 lbs is awesome!

    I guess I don't know what kind of workout you have in mind here- be it weight lifting or some kind of cardio- but weight lifting doesn't get rid of fat, it just makes things nice and toned underneath (which is great :) ). No workout specifically targets fat, except in the sense that it may help achieve the calorie deficit necessary to burn fat overall. In fact, a person wouldn't have to work out at all to do that, but the aesthetics will be much better.

    No, but lifting helps you retain muscle as you lose, otherwise, you lose fat and muscle, making it harder to look how you want.

    If your goal was to lose 10 lbs but didn't lift, you may lose 4 lbs of lbm and 6 fat, which would look different than if your lost 10, 8 of which is fat. That extra 2 lbs of fat loss makes a difference from a bf% standpoint

    Uh-huh... that's why I said it improves aesthetics. ;) I was just replying to the implication of the previous poster that lifting (or cardio) is necessary to lose fat. I'm all for weight lifting :)
  • try2again
    try2again Posts: 3,562 Member
    try2again wrote: »
    pilia13 wrote: »
    If you are not working out at the gym, it will be hard to lose that. I’d suggest trying that if you haven’t already. Congratulations on the weight loss, 23 lbs is awesome!

    I guess I don't know what kind of workout you have in mind here- be it weight lifting or some kind of cardio- but weight lifting doesn't get rid of fat, it just makes things nice and toned underneath (which is great :) ). No workout specifically targets fat, except in the sense that it may help achieve the calorie deficit necessary to burn fat overall. In fact, a person wouldn't have to work out at all to do that, but the aesthetics will be much better.

    Um... why was my comment flagged?
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    try2again wrote: »
    try2again wrote: »
    pilia13 wrote: »
    If you are not working out at the gym, it will be hard to lose that. I’d suggest trying that if you haven’t already. Congratulations on the weight loss, 23 lbs is awesome!

    I guess I don't know what kind of workout you have in mind here- be it weight lifting or some kind of cardio- but weight lifting doesn't get rid of fat, it just makes things nice and toned underneath (which is great :) ). No workout specifically targets fat, except in the sense that it may help achieve the calorie deficit necessary to burn fat overall. In fact, a person wouldn't have to work out at all to do that, but the aesthetics will be much better.

    Um... why was my comment flagged?

    Good question... maybe someone isn't sure what a flag is for??
  • Kales97
    Kales97 Posts: 10 Member
    pilia13 wrote: »
    If you are not working out at the gym, it will be hard to lose that. I’d suggest trying that if you haven’t already. Congratulations on the weight loss, 23 lbs is awesome!

    Thank you; but I already workout 4-5x a week :)

  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    Kales97 wrote: »
    I’m down 22 lbs since March 1st. (I’m 5’8 & 175 lbs). I’ve gone down from size 12 to size 10 in jeans but my lower belly stays the same! 😭 Is there something specific I should be doing to lose the fat there? Or is this all genetic? It drives me crazy that the pouch still stays. (I’ve included a photo).

    Your lower belly is definitely not the same.

    For many, belly fat is primary fat stores...especially the lower belly. Primary fat stores are a first on, last off kind of thing.
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    edited May 2019
    Kales97 wrote: »
    pilia13 wrote: »
    If you are not working out at the gym, it will be hard to lose that. I’d suggest trying that if you haven’t already. Congratulations on the weight loss, 23 lbs is awesome!

    Thank you; but I already workout 4-5x a week :)

    Are you following a structured lifting program though?

    If not, take a look at some good options here:
    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10332083/which-lifting-program-is-the-best-for-you/p1
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    NovusDies wrote: »
    22 pounds in 88 days is a loss of 1.75 pounds a week. Part of your impatience may stem from not eating enough food to keep yourself satisfied.

    Nice catch, I didn't "run the numbers".

    OP losing this fast will also lead to a loss of lean muscle, not just fat. Meaning at your current weight you are a higher BF% than you would have been had you lost slower, while lifting and getting enough protein.
  • Kales97
    Kales97 Posts: 10 Member
    NovusDies wrote: »
    22 pounds in 88 days is a loss of 1.75 pounds a week. Part of your impatience may stem from not eating enough food to keep yourself satisfied.
    I lose the first 5 lbs in 3 days. I’m sure this was just the release of toxins or whatever. I eat 1400 give or take every day and I do not feel starving :)

  • Kales97
    Kales97 Posts: 10 Member
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    Mostly, I agree with others. You've made wonderful progress. You're within the range of normal appearance, but might want to continue losing a bit more weight given your goals.

    In addition, though I hesitate to say this, and it may just be a side effect of how you're standing to get the side selfie, but in the photo you seem to have some (very common) posture issues that exaggerate the feature that's concerning you. I think you may have some anterior pelvic tilt/exaggerated lumbar curve, i.e. upper part of pelvic bones tilted slightly forward of neutral. Your upper body isn't visible, but a bit of shoulder slump can also emphasize the belly area further (and it's super common among those of us who use computers and cell phones a lot), and is often seen in combination with the pelvic tilt.

    I don't mean to be picking on you, I'm truly trying to help you achieve your appearance goals. (Think of me as a sort of concerned old internet auntie who picks on you a little out of caring and concern, as I'm for sure old enough to be one.) :flowerforyou:

    Thank you for commenting this. It’s not the first time I’ve been told this in comments! Both my maternal grandmother and my mother have this exaggerated curve in the back. I’ve also been to a chiropractor and I don’t any hip / back issues. But I agree, that posture could change how a belly sticks out. However I’m not sure if there is anything I could do about this? I don’t think it comes down to my posture, just the way my body is built (I assume)? Haha.
  • TravisJHunt
    TravisJHunt Posts: 533 Member
    I can see the difference and I'd say if you did a measurement before and after there'd be a pretty significant difference.
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    erickirb wrote: »
    Lower belly is the real *kitten*. It truly is the last to go. I am at 9.2% bf, I still have 6 centimeters to go. because of my body type. MY dietitian calculated with her formulas that for me to see abszzzz, I need to go to 5.7%. Now, that sounds ridiculously low, but, I am putting on 1.2 pounds of muscle for every pound on fat I drop. So, My weight is actually the same or a bit higher. But, losing everywhere. So, do not lose faith. Stay consistent, stay in the game, and you will achieve the desired results. Just have a realistic timeline.

    at 9.2% you wuld be ripped already, my profile pic is me at 11ish. and no way you are putting on 1.2 lbs of muscle for every lb you lose. you would need to be new to lifting and on gear to get those kinds of results. most people actually lose a little muscle as they cut, esp. once they are sub 12% BF% as there is less fat stores to pull from.

    not saying your results are not impressive, the difference in your photos shows your work. just that the body takes like a month to add a lb of muscle in a surplus getting adequate protein, nutrition, etc. younger new to lifting men may be able to add 2lbs/month.

    Either someone is vengeful, or they have no idea what the woo button is... I go woo'd 3 times for this post??