Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

The most polarizing food: where do you stand?

Options
1121315171839

Replies

  • paperpudding
    paperpudding Posts: 8,991 Member
    Options
    JenSD6 wrote: »
    I

    And we've barely touched on the subject of sauerkraut on hotdogs! Must have!

    Well I havent touched on that because I have never heard of such a combo :o

    Most people here have tomato sauce (what you call ketchup) on hot dogs.
    Some people have them plain and some have mustard or BBQ sauce or occasionally some other sort of sauce, like sweet chilli.

    People also sometimes have additional things with the dog/sauce - cheese, onion, bacon.

    Not mayo. Not sauerkraut.

    Both of those things, IMO, are yummy and have their place - but that place is not on hotdogs :s

  • Dnarules
    Dnarules Posts: 2,081 Member
    Options
    JenSD6 wrote: »
    I

    And we've barely touched on the subject of sauerkraut on hotdogs! Must have!

    Well I havent touched on that because I have never heard of such a combo :o

    Most people here have tomato sauce (what you call ketchup) on hot dogs.
    Some people have them plain and some have mustard or BBQ sauce or occasionally some other sort of sauce, like sweet chilli.

    People also sometimes have additional things with the dog/sauce - cheese, onion, bacon.

    Not mayo. Not sauerkraut.

    Both of those things, IMO, are yummy and have their place - but that place is not on hotdogs :s

    I enjoy sauerkraut on a hot dog sometimes. I really love chilli and Cole slaw (Carolina style) or chilli with onion and mustard.
  • bmeadows380
    bmeadows380 Posts: 2,981 Member
    Options
    Dnarules wrote: »
    JenSD6 wrote: »
    I

    And we've barely touched on the subject of sauerkraut on hotdogs! Must have!

    Well I havent touched on that because I have never heard of such a combo :o

    Most people here have tomato sauce (what you call ketchup) on hot dogs.
    Some people have them plain and some have mustard or BBQ sauce or occasionally some other sort of sauce, like sweet chilli.

    People also sometimes have additional things with the dog/sauce - cheese, onion, bacon.

    Not mayo. Not sauerkraut.

    Both of those things, IMO, are yummy and have their place - but that place is not on hotdogs :s

    I enjoy sauerkraut on a hot dog sometimes. I really love chilli and Cole slaw (Carolina style) or chilli with onion and mustard.

    well, a WV hot dog kind of has mayo on it because a regular hot dog here is made up of meat chili (homemade is always superior to canned and hold those stupid beans!), ketchup, mustard, coleslaw, and onions. sometimes folks will use relish, but not often.

    so nope, sorry - chili and slaw on a hotdog started in WV, not Carolina :smiley: lol

    The funny thing about chili and slaw on a hotdog; I lived in Ashland, KY for a while during college, and the folks there had never heard of such a thing and thought it sounded gross. The guys I worked with just across the border in south western PA hadn't heard of it that way, either, but sure did like it when I introduced them to the concept!
  • Phirrgus
    Phirrgus Posts: 1,894 Member
    Options
    vanityy99 wrote: »
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »

    So, you seem to be drawing a distinction between homemade cookies, and these cookies. Let's dig into that a bit, shall we? (I have no pre-defined agenda here: I don't eat the Lofthouse cookies, think they're gross, but I'm very laissez faire when it comes to others' choices.)

    This started with your initial post being woo-ed, and you asking why. So let's approach this in a fact-based manner, since that would be a science-ish thing to do.

    According to the Food Lion (grocery store) web site, these cookies have the following ingredients:
    Sugar, Enriched Bleached Wheat Flour (Flour, Niacin, Reduced Iron, Thiamine Mononitrate, Riboflavin, Folic Acid), Margarine (Palm Oil, Water, Soybean Oil, Salt, Contains 2% or less of: Mono- & Diglycerides, Calcium Disodium EDTA [Preservative], Artificial Flavor, Annatto [Color], Vitamin A Palmitate), Eggs, Contains 2% or less of: Water, Corn Starch, Vegetable Oil (Palm Kernel Oil and/or Palm Oil and/or Partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil [Cottonseed and/or Soybean Oil]), Dextrin, Skim Milk, Natural & Artificial Flavors, Leavening (Baking Soda, Sodium Aluminum Sulfate, Monocalcium Phosphate), Soy Lecithin (Emulsifier),Confectioner's Glaze (Lac Resin), Food Starch-Modified, Colors (Carmine [Color], Blue 1, Blue 1 Lake, Blue 2, Blue 2 Lake, Red 3, Red 40, Red 40 Lake, Yellow 5, Yellow 5 Lake, Yellow 6, Yellow 6 Lake), Polysorbate 60, Carnauba Wax, Sodium Propionate (Preservative).

    If I were making cookies at home, most of those ingredients would be in the cookies, especially true for the ingredients at the top (more predominant ones): Sugar, flour, some kind of oil or shortening (probably a simpler one like butter, or coconut oil, because yummier), eggs, milk, leavening. I wouldn't put in artificial flavors (natural vanilla extract is yummier IMO), probably not the artificial colors (I mostly don't want colors - but if I did it would be standard commercial food coloring, which would likely be this same stuff). I certainly wouldn't put in the preservatives (gonna eat 'em or freeze 'em), carnauba wax (?!), or the Confectioners Glaze (Lac Resin) (no idea what that even is).

    So, bottom line: Similar ingredients, differences in the minor items. (This might justify a "woo", in some people's minds.)

    Next up, nutrition: Specifically, do they have nutritional value, or are they "masquerading as food".
    Nutrition Facts
    Serving Size 38 g
    Servings Per Container 10
    Amount Per Serving
    Calories 160.0 Cal
    Calories From Fat 50.0 Cal
    % Daily Value
    Total Fat 6.0g 9.0%
    Saturated Fat 2.5 g 13.0
    Trans Fat 0.0 g
    Cholesterol 5.0 mg 2.0
    Sodium 100.0 mg4.0
    Total Carbohydrate 26.0g 9.0%
    Dietary Fiber 0.0 g 0.0
    Sugars 16.0 g
    Protein 1.0 g
    Vitamin A 4.0
    Vitamin C 0.0
    Calcium 0.0
    Iron 4.0

    So, "food energy" (calories ;) ), tiny (negligible) amount of protein, a little fat, tiny vitamin A and iron. Not great. Probably not that far off home-made, but realistically, very low nutrition for the calories, mostly sugar and carbs. They might be a truly affirmative choice for an endurance athlete who enjoyed them and needed the calories. For anyone else who enjoys them, seems like a "sometimes food".

    Conclusion: Nothing in particular. Just some facts. It's just that I don't mostly enjoy rant-y emotional stuff. Facts are good. ;)

    Y'all are having some good fun, but I'm still hung up on what I bolded in that ingredients list. See, I use Carnauba wax ON MY PICKUP TRUCK :D

    Following that logic, anything I can put into my body that passes out the other end without killing me or sickening me can be classified as food.

    An abomination colored pretty pink. That's what these cookies are.

    I'm going to go slug this down now. Maybe I'll have a new product to put on market shelves soon.

    JgFa8Kl.jpg


    :#


    Seriously, that doesn't bother anyone?

    Yeah it does. The cookies have that? @Phirrgus

    They do @vanityy99 I did a bit of reading on the subject and from what I understand it's a very common additive in the food industry. And it's used for the exact same purpose as the car wax on vehicles. To make the food more appealing visually.

    I understand visual appeal, but geez...ya know? There's just something wrong when "shiny/pretty" sells foods over nutritional value.

    https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2012/10/10/EFSA-reaffirms-carnauba-wax-safety-at-current-usage-levels#
  • nooboots
    nooboots Posts: 480 Member
    Options
    kimny72 wrote: »
    kimny72 wrote: »
    Not quite but very similar.

    They are both available on Amazon and not terribly expensive, I might need to make this happen.

    A tip from someone who eats it.. the biggest mistake people make is to slather it on.. try just a smear on your toast. Enjoy 🙂

    :lol: Thanks, I will think "condiment", not "peanut butter substitute"!

    I always need tons of butter with it. Its very salty and always gives me mouth ulcers. I like it though
  • nooboots
    nooboots Posts: 480 Member
    Options
    I think peanut butter is polarising on MFP - well, at least everyone else seems other pole to me.

    I don't like the stuff and never eat it and don't even have any in my house.

    Everyone else on MFP seems to think it is nectar of the gods. :o

    I like it a lot but not as much as my husband does...it's probably his #1 food. I think of it as a "sweet" food, he says it's savory.

    I did this once, put peanut butter on toast, grated cheese on that, then chilli flakes on that and put it under the grill. Cheese on toast on top of peanut butter, it was fantastic
  • lemurcat2
    lemurcat2 Posts: 7,885 Member
    Options
    https://www.chowhound.com/food-news/121025/why-does-ketchup-on-a-hot-dog-piss-people-off/

    "No one should squirt ketchup on a hot dog after the age of 18, say officials at the National Hot Dog and Sausage Council, part of the American Meat Institute.

    “You have to grow up sometime,” says council president Janet Riley, a.k.a. “the Queen of Wien” in her Hot Dog Etiquette video."

  • lemurcat2
    lemurcat2 Posts: 7,885 Member
    Options
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    lemurcat2 wrote: »
    https://www.chowhound.com/food-news/121025/why-does-ketchup-on-a-hot-dog-piss-people-off/

    "No one should squirt ketchup on a hot dog after the age of 18, say officials at the National Hot Dog and Sausage Council, part of the American Meat Institute.

    “You have to grow up sometime,” says council president Janet Riley, a.k.a. “the Queen of Wien” in her Hot Dog Etiquette video."

    There's really a National Hot Dog and Sausage Council? Well, they can't tell me what to do.

    *Squirts more ketchup on hotdog..."

    I think it's hilarious how upset some get at the idea of ketchup on a hotdog. I also liked the baseball related theory for it, if you followed the link.

    (I don't like ketchup on hotdogs, but think it's fine that others do.)
  • Dnarules
    Dnarules Posts: 2,081 Member
    Options
    kimny72 wrote: »
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    vanityy99 wrote: »
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »

    So, you seem to be drawing a distinction between homemade cookies, and these cookies. Let's dig into that a bit, shall we? (I have no pre-defined agenda here: I don't eat the Lofthouse cookies, think they're gross, but I'm very laissez faire when it comes to others' choices.)

    This started with your initial post being woo-ed, and you asking why. So let's approach this in a fact-based manner, since that would be a science-ish thing to do.

    According to the Food Lion (grocery store) web site, these cookies have the following ingredients:
    Sugar, Enriched Bleached Wheat Flour (Flour, Niacin, Reduced Iron, Thiamine Mononitrate, Riboflavin, Folic Acid), Margarine (Palm Oil, Water, Soybean Oil, Salt, Contains 2% or less of: Mono- & Diglycerides, Calcium Disodium EDTA [Preservative], Artificial Flavor, Annatto [Color], Vitamin A Palmitate), Eggs, Contains 2% or less of: Water, Corn Starch, Vegetable Oil (Palm Kernel Oil and/or Palm Oil and/or Partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil [Cottonseed and/or Soybean Oil]), Dextrin, Skim Milk, Natural & Artificial Flavors, Leavening (Baking Soda, Sodium Aluminum Sulfate, Monocalcium Phosphate), Soy Lecithin (Emulsifier),Confectioner's Glaze (Lac Resin), Food Starch-Modified, Colors (Carmine [Color], Blue 1, Blue 1 Lake, Blue 2, Blue 2 Lake, Red 3, Red 40, Red 40 Lake, Yellow 5, Yellow 5 Lake, Yellow 6, Yellow 6 Lake), Polysorbate 60, Carnauba Wax, Sodium Propionate (Preservative).

    If I were making cookies at home, most of those ingredients would be in the cookies, especially true for the ingredients at the top (more predominant ones): Sugar, flour, some kind of oil or shortening (probably a simpler one like butter, or coconut oil, because yummier), eggs, milk, leavening. I wouldn't put in artificial flavors (natural vanilla extract is yummier IMO), probably not the artificial colors (I mostly don't want colors - but if I did it would be standard commercial food coloring, which would likely be this same stuff). I certainly wouldn't put in the preservatives (gonna eat 'em or freeze 'em), carnauba wax (?!), or the Confectioners Glaze (Lac Resin) (no idea what that even is).

    So, bottom line: Similar ingredients, differences in the minor items. (This might justify a "woo", in some people's minds.)

    Next up, nutrition: Specifically, do they have nutritional value, or are they "masquerading as food".
    Nutrition Facts
    Serving Size 38 g
    Servings Per Container 10
    Amount Per Serving
    Calories 160.0 Cal
    Calories From Fat 50.0 Cal
    % Daily Value
    Total Fat 6.0g 9.0%
    Saturated Fat 2.5 g 13.0
    Trans Fat 0.0 g
    Cholesterol 5.0 mg 2.0
    Sodium 100.0 mg4.0
    Total Carbohydrate 26.0g 9.0%
    Dietary Fiber 0.0 g 0.0
    Sugars 16.0 g
    Protein 1.0 g
    Vitamin A 4.0
    Vitamin C 0.0
    Calcium 0.0
    Iron 4.0

    So, "food energy" (calories ;) ), tiny (negligible) amount of protein, a little fat, tiny vitamin A and iron. Not great. Probably not that far off home-made, but realistically, very low nutrition for the calories, mostly sugar and carbs. They might be a truly affirmative choice for an endurance athlete who enjoyed them and needed the calories. For anyone else who enjoys them, seems like a "sometimes food".

    Conclusion: Nothing in particular. Just some facts. It's just that I don't mostly enjoy rant-y emotional stuff. Facts are good. ;)

    Y'all are having some good fun, but I'm still hung up on what I bolded in that ingredients list. See, I use Carnauba wax ON MY PICKUP TRUCK :D

    Following that logic, anything I can put into my body that passes out the other end without killing me or sickening me can be classified as food.

    An abomination colored pretty pink. That's what these cookies are.

    I'm going to go slug this down now. Maybe I'll have a new product to put on market shelves soon.

    JgFa8Kl.jpg


    :#


    Seriously, that doesn't bother anyone?

    Yeah it does. The cookies have that? @Phirrgus

    They do @vanityy99 I did a bit of reading on the subject and from what I understand it's a very common additive in the food industry. And it's used for the exact same purpose as the car wax on vehicles. To make the food more appealing visually.

    I understand visual appeal, but geez...ya know? There's just something wrong when "shiny/pretty" sells foods over nutritional value.

    https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2012/10/10/EFSA-reaffirms-carnauba-wax-safety-at-current-usage-levels#

    This is the same as when Food Babe went after some additive that is used in commercial breads that is also used in yoga mats. The additive was a natural edible substance that was used in food long before anyone realized it would serve some purpose in yoga mats, but people can have this reaction that just because something is useful in a non-edible product, it somehow makes it now weird in an edible product. I'd bet people in the tropics were consuming carnauba leaves in some way long before anyone realized the stuff would make your car shiny :wink:

    This conversation makes me think of that non-nutritive coating Clark Griswold used on Christmas Vacation lol.
  • Phirrgus
    Phirrgus Posts: 1,894 Member
    Options
    kimny72 wrote: »
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    vanityy99 wrote: »
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »

    So, you seem to be drawing a distinction between homemade cookies, and these cookies. Let's dig into that a bit, shall we? (I have no pre-defined agenda here: I don't eat the Lofthouse cookies, think they're gross, but I'm very laissez faire when it comes to others' choices.)

    This started with your initial post being woo-ed, and you asking why. So let's approach this in a fact-based manner, since that would be a science-ish thing to do.

    According to the Food Lion (grocery store) web site, these cookies have the following ingredients:
    Sugar, Enriched Bleached Wheat Flour (Flour, Niacin, Reduced Iron, Thiamine Mononitrate, Riboflavin, Folic Acid), Margarine (Palm Oil, Water, Soybean Oil, Salt, Contains 2% or less of: Mono- & Diglycerides, Calcium Disodium EDTA [Preservative], Artificial Flavor, Annatto [Color], Vitamin A Palmitate), Eggs, Contains 2% or less of: Water, Corn Starch, Vegetable Oil (Palm Kernel Oil and/or Palm Oil and/or Partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil [Cottonseed and/or Soybean Oil]), Dextrin, Skim Milk, Natural & Artificial Flavors, Leavening (Baking Soda, Sodium Aluminum Sulfate, Monocalcium Phosphate), Soy Lecithin (Emulsifier),Confectioner's Glaze (Lac Resin), Food Starch-Modified, Colors (Carmine [Color], Blue 1, Blue 1 Lake, Blue 2, Blue 2 Lake, Red 3, Red 40, Red 40 Lake, Yellow 5, Yellow 5 Lake, Yellow 6, Yellow 6 Lake), Polysorbate 60, Carnauba Wax, Sodium Propionate (Preservative).

    If I were making cookies at home, most of those ingredients would be in the cookies, especially true for the ingredients at the top (more predominant ones): Sugar, flour, some kind of oil or shortening (probably a simpler one like butter, or coconut oil, because yummier), eggs, milk, leavening. I wouldn't put in artificial flavors (natural vanilla extract is yummier IMO), probably not the artificial colors (I mostly don't want colors - but if I did it would be standard commercial food coloring, which would likely be this same stuff). I certainly wouldn't put in the preservatives (gonna eat 'em or freeze 'em), carnauba wax (?!), or the Confectioners Glaze (Lac Resin) (no idea what that even is).

    So, bottom line: Similar ingredients, differences in the minor items. (This might justify a "woo", in some people's minds.)

    Next up, nutrition: Specifically, do they have nutritional value, or are they "masquerading as food".
    Nutrition Facts
    Serving Size 38 g
    Servings Per Container 10
    Amount Per Serving
    Calories 160.0 Cal
    Calories From Fat 50.0 Cal
    % Daily Value
    Total Fat 6.0g 9.0%
    Saturated Fat 2.5 g 13.0
    Trans Fat 0.0 g
    Cholesterol 5.0 mg 2.0
    Sodium 100.0 mg4.0
    Total Carbohydrate 26.0g 9.0%
    Dietary Fiber 0.0 g 0.0
    Sugars 16.0 g
    Protein 1.0 g
    Vitamin A 4.0
    Vitamin C 0.0
    Calcium 0.0
    Iron 4.0

    So, "food energy" (calories ;) ), tiny (negligible) amount of protein, a little fat, tiny vitamin A and iron. Not great. Probably not that far off home-made, but realistically, very low nutrition for the calories, mostly sugar and carbs. They might be a truly affirmative choice for an endurance athlete who enjoyed them and needed the calories. For anyone else who enjoys them, seems like a "sometimes food".

    Conclusion: Nothing in particular. Just some facts. It's just that I don't mostly enjoy rant-y emotional stuff. Facts are good. ;)

    Y'all are having some good fun, but I'm still hung up on what I bolded in that ingredients list. See, I use Carnauba wax ON MY PICKUP TRUCK :D

    Following that logic, anything I can put into my body that passes out the other end without killing me or sickening me can be classified as food.

    An abomination colored pretty pink. That's what these cookies are.

    I'm going to go slug this down now. Maybe I'll have a new product to put on market shelves soon.

    JgFa8Kl.jpg


    :#


    Seriously, that doesn't bother anyone?

    Yeah it does. The cookies have that? @Phirrgus

    They do @vanityy99 I did a bit of reading on the subject and from what I understand it's a very common additive in the food industry. And it's used for the exact same purpose as the car wax on vehicles. To make the food more appealing visually.

    I understand visual appeal, but geez...ya know? There's just something wrong when "shiny/pretty" sells foods over nutritional value.

    https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2012/10/10/EFSA-reaffirms-carnauba-wax-safety-at-current-usage-levels#

    This is the same as when Food Babe went after some additive that is used in commercial breads that is also used in yoga mats. The additive was a natural edible substance that was used in food long before anyone realized it would serve some purpose in yoga mats, but people can have this reaction that just because something is useful in a non-edible product, it somehow makes it now weird in an edible product. I'd bet people in the tropics were consuming carnauba leaves in some way long before anyone realized the stuff would make your car shiny :wink:

    I think I actually remember that yoga mat debacle. Wasn't it some type of wood chip product? On the wax - I'm sure you're right kimny, but gag reflex lol. It's truly an irrational mental thing. I know it's there so bye bye candy corn :(
  • Phirrgus
    Phirrgus Posts: 1,894 Member
    Options
    bpetrosky wrote: »
    lemurcat2 wrote: »
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    lemurcat2 wrote: »
    https://www.chowhound.com/food-news/121025/why-does-ketchup-on-a-hot-dog-piss-people-off/

    "No one should squirt ketchup on a hot dog after the age of 18, say officials at the National Hot Dog and Sausage Council, part of the American Meat Institute.

    “You have to grow up sometime,” says council president Janet Riley, a.k.a. “the Queen of Wien” in her Hot Dog Etiquette video."

    There's really a National Hot Dog and Sausage Council? Well, they can't tell me what to do.

    *Squirts more ketchup on hotdog..."

    I think it's hilarious how upset some get at the idea of ketchup on a hotdog. I also liked the baseball related theory for it, if you followed the link.

    (I don't like ketchup on hotdogs, but think it's fine that others do.)

    It's perfectly OK if someone wants to put ketchup on their hot dog. Really. It's ok and there's no reason for me to think badly of them. Really. It's
    OK. I might think they must have a defective microbiome or some epigenetic condition. But it's OK. Really.
    I might have chuckled a bit too much at that last bit..
  • pancakerunner
    pancakerunner Posts: 6,137 Member
    Options
    I'll get burnt for this I'm sure but I really don't see the point in making crap like this for human consumption. Don't we have enough 'proper' food - and crap - already? Just seems a waste of raw materials, packaging, shipping, labelling, buying and eventually excreting. (Similar to those cheap 99p plastic toys that break as you unwrap them - they're not fit for intended purpose so why make then in the first place - oh right, money - of course!!)

    Sorry - rant over.

    Sorry, this is a safe, non-judgmental community. Let's not judge the things people choose to purchase and consume :)
  • pancakerunner
    pancakerunner Posts: 6,137 Member
    edited June 2019
    Options
    I understand the WOO 'system' so can the phantom woo-er please explain what part of what i'm saying is 'pseudoscience/snake oil/fad diet' etc. so I can alter my viewpoint if necessary.

    You are projecting, preaching and being flat out offensive. Please understand that everyone on this platform comes from different backgrounds and is at different stages of their health/wellness/fitness/food journey. I think you need to reevaluate what you are trying to get out of this community. :)
  • pancakerunner
    pancakerunner Posts: 6,137 Member
    Options
    Dnarules wrote: »
    JenSD6 wrote: »
    I

    And we've barely touched on the subject of sauerkraut on hotdogs! Must have!

    Well I havent touched on that because I have never heard of such a combo :o

    Most people here have tomato sauce (what you call ketchup) on hot dogs.
    Some people have them plain and some have mustard or BBQ sauce or occasionally some other sort of sauce, like sweet chilli.

    People also sometimes have additional things with the dog/sauce - cheese, onion, bacon.

    Not mayo. Not sauerkraut.

    Both of those things, IMO, are yummy and have their place - but that place is not on hotdogs :s

    I enjoy sauerkraut on a hot dog sometimes. I really love chilli and Cole slaw (Carolina style) or chilli with onion and mustard.

    I'm a fan of sauerkraut with just about any type of meat.. haha. But I can't do chili... too much!
  • glassyo
    glassyo Posts: 7,594 Member
    Options
    bpetrosky wrote: »
    lemurcat2 wrote: »
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    lemurcat2 wrote: »
    https://www.chowhound.com/food-news/121025/why-does-ketchup-on-a-hot-dog-piss-people-off/

    "No one should squirt ketchup on a hot dog after the age of 18, say officials at the National Hot Dog and Sausage Council, part of the American Meat Institute.

    “You have to grow up sometime,” says council president Janet Riley, a.k.a. “the Queen of Wien” in her Hot Dog Etiquette video."

    There's really a National Hot Dog and Sausage Council? Well, they can't tell me what to do.

    *Squirts more ketchup on hotdog..."

    I think it's hilarious how upset some get at the idea of ketchup on a hotdog. I also liked the baseball related theory for it, if you followed the link.

    (I don't like ketchup on hotdogs, but think it's fine that others do.)

    It's perfectly OK if someone wants to put ketchup on their hot dog. Really. It's ok and there's no reason for me to think badly of them. Really. It's
    OK. I might think they must have a defective microbiome or some epigenetic condition. But it's OK. Really.

    I hugged you because I think you really neded one but I. AM. PUTTING. KETCHUP. ON. MY. HOT. DOG.!!!!!!
  • glassyo
    glassyo Posts: 7,594 Member
    Options
    I'll get burnt for this I'm sure but I really don't see the point in making crap like this for human consumption. Don't we have enough 'proper' food - and crap - already? Just seems a waste of raw materials, packaging, shipping, labelling, buying and eventually excreting. (Similar to those cheap 99p plastic toys that break as you unwrap them - they're not fit for intended purpose so why make then in the first place - oh right, money - of course!!)

    Sorry - rant over.

    Sorry, this is a safe, non-judgmental community. Let's not judge the things people choose to purchase and consume :)

    That was sarcasm, right? :p
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 32,130 Member
    Options
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    kimny72 wrote: »
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    vanityy99 wrote: »
    Phirrgus wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »

    So, you seem to be drawing a distinction between homemade cookies, and these cookies. Let's dig into that a bit, shall we? (I have no pre-defined agenda here: I don't eat the Lofthouse cookies, think they're gross, but I'm very laissez faire when it comes to others' choices.)

    This started with your initial post being woo-ed, and you asking why. So let's approach this in a fact-based manner, since that would be a science-ish thing to do.

    According to the Food Lion (grocery store) web site, these cookies have the following ingredients:
    Sugar, Enriched Bleached Wheat Flour (Flour, Niacin, Reduced Iron, Thiamine Mononitrate, Riboflavin, Folic Acid), Margarine (Palm Oil, Water, Soybean Oil, Salt, Contains 2% or less of: Mono- & Diglycerides, Calcium Disodium EDTA [Preservative], Artificial Flavor, Annatto [Color], Vitamin A Palmitate), Eggs, Contains 2% or less of: Water, Corn Starch, Vegetable Oil (Palm Kernel Oil and/or Palm Oil and/or Partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil [Cottonseed and/or Soybean Oil]), Dextrin, Skim Milk, Natural & Artificial Flavors, Leavening (Baking Soda, Sodium Aluminum Sulfate, Monocalcium Phosphate), Soy Lecithin (Emulsifier),Confectioner's Glaze (Lac Resin), Food Starch-Modified, Colors (Carmine [Color], Blue 1, Blue 1 Lake, Blue 2, Blue 2 Lake, Red 3, Red 40, Red 40 Lake, Yellow 5, Yellow 5 Lake, Yellow 6, Yellow 6 Lake), Polysorbate 60, Carnauba Wax, Sodium Propionate (Preservative).

    If I were making cookies at home, most of those ingredients would be in the cookies, especially true for the ingredients at the top (more predominant ones): Sugar, flour, some kind of oil or shortening (probably a simpler one like butter, or coconut oil, because yummier), eggs, milk, leavening. I wouldn't put in artificial flavors (natural vanilla extract is yummier IMO), probably not the artificial colors (I mostly don't want colors - but if I did it would be standard commercial food coloring, which would likely be this same stuff). I certainly wouldn't put in the preservatives (gonna eat 'em or freeze 'em), carnauba wax (?!), or the Confectioners Glaze (Lac Resin) (no idea what that even is).

    So, bottom line: Similar ingredients, differences in the minor items. (This might justify a "woo", in some people's minds.)

    Next up, nutrition: Specifically, do they have nutritional value, or are they "masquerading as food".
    Nutrition Facts
    Serving Size 38 g
    Servings Per Container 10
    Amount Per Serving
    Calories 160.0 Cal
    Calories From Fat 50.0 Cal
    % Daily Value
    Total Fat 6.0g 9.0%
    Saturated Fat 2.5 g 13.0
    Trans Fat 0.0 g
    Cholesterol 5.0 mg 2.0
    Sodium 100.0 mg4.0
    Total Carbohydrate 26.0g 9.0%
    Dietary Fiber 0.0 g 0.0
    Sugars 16.0 g
    Protein 1.0 g
    Vitamin A 4.0
    Vitamin C 0.0
    Calcium 0.0
    Iron 4.0

    So, "food energy" (calories ;) ), tiny (negligible) amount of protein, a little fat, tiny vitamin A and iron. Not great. Probably not that far off home-made, but realistically, very low nutrition for the calories, mostly sugar and carbs. They might be a truly affirmative choice for an endurance athlete who enjoyed them and needed the calories. For anyone else who enjoys them, seems like a "sometimes food".

    Conclusion: Nothing in particular. Just some facts. It's just that I don't mostly enjoy rant-y emotional stuff. Facts are good. ;)

    Y'all are having some good fun, but I'm still hung up on what I bolded in that ingredients list. See, I use Carnauba wax ON MY PICKUP TRUCK :D

    Following that logic, anything I can put into my body that passes out the other end without killing me or sickening me can be classified as food.

    An abomination colored pretty pink. That's what these cookies are.

    I'm going to go slug this down now. Maybe I'll have a new product to put on market shelves soon.

    JgFa8Kl.jpg


    :#


    Seriously, that doesn't bother anyone?

    Yeah it does. The cookies have that? @Phirrgus

    They do @vanityy99 I did a bit of reading on the subject and from what I understand it's a very common additive in the food industry. And it's used for the exact same purpose as the car wax on vehicles. To make the food more appealing visually.

    I understand visual appeal, but geez...ya know? There's just something wrong when "shiny/pretty" sells foods over nutritional value.

    https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2012/10/10/EFSA-reaffirms-carnauba-wax-safety-at-current-usage-levels#

    This is the same as when Food Babe went after some additive that is used in commercial breads that is also used in yoga mats. The additive was a natural edible substance that was used in food long before anyone realized it would serve some purpose in yoga mats, but people can have this reaction that just because something is useful in a non-edible product, it somehow makes it now weird in an edible product. I'd bet people in the tropics were consuming carnauba leaves in some way long before anyone realized the stuff would make your car shiny :wink:

    I think I actually remember that yoga mat debacle. Wasn't it some type of wood chip product? On the wax - I'm sure you're right kimny, but gag reflex lol. It's truly an irrational mental thing. I know it's there so bye bye candy corn :(

    So the carnauba wax from palm leaves bothered you, but the insect-secreted shellac (Confectioner's Glaze/Lac Resin) didn't. Interesting.

    K. ;)