What nobody tells you about losing weight

1340341343345346394

Replies

  • IronIsMyTherapy
    IronIsMyTherapy Posts: 482 Member
    cppeace wrote: »
    That every Single week (If even that long) you have to work harder to burn the same amount of calories.

    That your cat takes longer to find a comfy position laying on you lol

    idk if this helps but as your weight drops, your calories have to as well. If you're 150lbs and lose 15lbs, you weigh 10% less and your calories need to drop 10% accordingly. Assuming your activity is the same and you haven't gained muscle.
  • IronIsMyTherapy
    IronIsMyTherapy Posts: 482 Member
    mtaratoot wrote: »
    cppeace wrote: »
    That every Single week (If even that long) you have to work harder to burn the same amount of calories.

    That your cat takes longer to find a comfy position laying on you lol

    idk if this helps but as your weight drops, your calories have to as well. If you're 150lbs and lose 15lbs, you weigh 10% less and your calories need to drop 10% accordingly. Assuming your activity is the same and you haven't gained muscle.

    Not quite exactly.

    For sure your caloric requirement does decrease as your mass does; there's less of you to move around. It's not linear, though. A 10% decrease in mass doesn't mean a 10% decrease in calorie needs. A large amount of our daily calorie needs are to fuel our brain. Our brain uses a LOT of fuel. But yes, it's a very good idea to go back to the goal setting portion of MFP as your mass decreases and then reset your calorie consumption target because, sadly if you like to eat, it will decrease.

    As an example, if I tell MFP I want to maintain at 175 pounds, I get 1980 calories. If I tell MFP I want to maintain at 145 pounds, I get 1810 calories. A 22.8% reduction in my mass reduces my caloric requirements 8.6%. So yes, you do have to adjust your calorie-in goal as you get closer to your target weight goal, but it's not one for one.

    I get your point and don't disagree, although MFP's recommendations are largely inaccurate. There's a lot of factors not accounted for, like LBM. If I cut from 210 to 185 for a competition, my caloric requirement decrease is closer to one for one because of my approach to diet and exercise.
  • cppeace
    cppeace Posts: 764 Member
    edited September 2020
    mtaratoot wrote: »
    cppeace wrote: »
    cppeace wrote: »
    That every Single week (If even that long) you have to work harder to burn the same amount of calories.

    That your cat takes longer to find a comfy position laying on you lol

    idk if this helps but as your weight drops, your calories have to as well. If you're 150lbs and lose 15lbs, you weigh 10% less and your calories need to drop 10% accordingly. Assuming your activity is the same and you haven't gained muscle.

    Not sure if that was actually meant for me. I was stating that you have to exercise harder because your body gets used to the exercise level and you burn less calories.

    Not quite exactly.

    It's just that as you have less mass, it takes less energy to move yourself around. Your body doesn't "get used" to the exercise; it's just not as much work to perform the same task. A calorie is a measure of energy. If you want to move a two-pound box of pickling salt a mile, it takes less work than a 20-pound bag of ice melting salt. Same salt, just a different amount of it. So as you lose mass, if you perform the same exercise, you have to do it longer to expend the same number of calories as when you were a higher mass. That's why you need to reassess your calorie target from time to time as you lose mass.

    And you know what? It's AWESOME!

    After you've lost a fair bit of weight, find something heavy and carry it around. I strapped 30 pounds of SCUBA weight on me and walked around. My knees hurt right away. But I used to ALWAYS carry that much weight around ALL the time.

    I will gladly walk a little farther to not carry the extra, unneeded, unwanted weight.

    Well, then maybe I'm just weird, because my body will get used to an exercise level within a week or less. My hrm tells me my heart is working slightly less hard, meaning I am burning less calories even when putting out the same energy level. I am not losing enough mass in 5-7 days for weight to be the big difference in calorie burn.
    ETA it's walking, aerobics and minor strength training using a total gym.
  • salleewins
    salleewins Posts: 2,308 Member
    smantha32 wrote: »
    When I was gaining weight, the last time I bought clothes, I was a size 14. I continued to think I was a size 14, even though my clothes were getting tight.

    I then lost about 35 pounds. For someone my height, this is 3-4 dress sizes. Therefore, I thought I was a size 8. I went to go try on clothes for the first time in a while, since my stuff is getting loose.

    I am not a size 8. I did drop 3-4 dress sizes, but I am a size 10-12 now. Denial was strong with this person. I was probably up to like an 18 before I started losing, but my brain did not connect.

    It's sometimes painful when reality hits you in the face. I would always think I gained 10 pounds over the holidays, only to find I gained 25. ugh.

    I can relate to this. Thanks for explaining it so clearly.
Do you Love MyFitnessPal? Have you crushed a goal or improved your life through better nutrition using MyFitnessPal?
Share your success and inspire others. Leave us a review on Apple Or Google Play stores!