What's on your mind?
Options
Replies
-
KosmosKitten wrote: »OpheliaCooter wrote: »OpheliaCooter wrote: »3 C it is. Clutch. Y’all feed me well.
Next time I’m hungry I’m pan frying orange roughy in cornmeal breading, fried okra, sweet cornbread, and the C was Chateau St Michelle Harvest Select Riesling.
The other proteins were…
Snapper
Cod
Catfish
And other wines-
A cab
A Merlot
The pairing turned out well
Welp, I’m finally hungry.
Pan-fried, homemade cornmeal battered orange roughy
Fried okra
Sweet cornbread
And a Riesling.
And, a sprinkle of homemade Cajun seasoning.
It would not occur to me to serve a Riesling (or wine at all) with fried fish.
Very much an old-fashioned, shot of whisky or beer type meal.
Also, nice selection on the Riesling. It's good.
I would too except it wasn’t even 1300 and Am saving that for tonight if I drink tonight at all.
The choices minus the 27 year;
Fantastic selection of Irish Whiskey!1 -
Nestor_____ wrote: »Taco Bell is absolute garbage. In the part of the country where I live, you can get quality comparative items from an authentic Mexican restaurant for about the same price or even slightly cheaper. With all-you-can-eat chips and about nine different salsas to choose from. Last time I went to Taco Bell, costed me $15 and some change for something that would have costed roughly $12 from the Mexican restaurant. Never again.
Duh. Always go to where the authentic is.
Not no bootleg, wannabe, uncultured, mimicking, you can try but can never BS.
If I go to a Italian restaurant, the cooks better be Italian.2 -
spider_mark51959 wrote: »KosmosKitten wrote: »OpheliaCooter wrote: »OpheliaCooter wrote: »3 C it is. Clutch. Y’all feed me well.
Next time I’m hungry I’m pan frying orange roughy in cornmeal breading, fried okra, sweet cornbread, and the C was Chateau St Michelle Harvest Select Riesling.
The other proteins were…
Snapper
Cod
Catfish
And other wines-
A cab
A Merlot
The pairing turned out well
Welp, I’m finally hungry.
Pan-fried, homemade cornmeal battered orange roughy
Fried okra
Sweet cornbread
And a Riesling.
And, a sprinkle of homemade Cajun seasoning.
It would not occur to me to serve a Riesling (or wine at all) with fried fish.
Very much an old-fashioned, shot of whisky or beer type meal.
Also, nice selection on the Riesling. It's good.
I would too except it wasn’t even 1300 and Am saving that for tonight if I drink tonight at all.
The choices minus the 27 year;
Fantastic selection of Irish Whiskey!
Thanks, bro. The Redbreast 27 is in a locked cabinet. :-)
I've already started trying to procure another bottle because it takes me about a year to get one.
Edit: Although, this weeks been absolutely fan-effin'-tastic for me so maybe I'll bust it out and pour a finger later.2 -
So, you knew what I was thinking about when I said this?
Gosh, are you psychic?
Maybe you should volunteer for experiments.
8 -
4 -
Hallmark and maybe a scotch. @tmanfive0
-
edit, edit, edit
....are naked man boobs any (less offensive) than woman boobs? And especially when the womans are mostly covered ?
...think this through people, before answering
...its a real need to cull of the ignorant moment
7 -
edit, edit, edit
....are naked man boobs any (less offensive) than woman boobs? And especially when the womans are mostly covered ?
...think this through people, before answering
...its a real need to cull of the ignorant moment
I'd argue that man boobs are much more offensive than women boobs 🤷🏽♂️5 -
edit, edit, edit
....are naked man boobs any (less offensive) than woman boobs? And especially when the womans are mostly covered ?
...think this through people, before answering
...its a real need to cull of the ignorant moment
Depends. Are we discussing someone's like mine? Or Kim Kardashian's?1 -
-
edit, edit, edit
....are naked man boobs any (less offensive) than woman boobs? And especially when the womans are mostly covered ?
...think this through people, before answering
...its a real need to cull of the ignorant moment
I'm still struggling to understand how *any* body part is offensive on its own. Wouldn't that depend on how the body part is being utilized or displayed? There's a big difference between a naked statue in a museum or a naked cameo in a film and say.. getting unwanted snapshots of someone's boobs or dong in a DM.
Bodies are just bodies.5 -
It’s the double standard for me. And I don’t even mean the one for men vs women. I mean the one for women with a larger chest vs. smaller. It’s so unfair to women who are bigger. Bigger chests are inherently (and wrongfully) viewed as more promiscuous.
I have had many female friends and relatives say to me that they are envious I can wear a v-neck. They don’t feel allowed to, whether because of work dress codes or because of the unwanted attention it brings. Sorry body police, but if someone has larger breasts, they’re going to have more cleavage. Basing a dress code on the amount of cleavage shown is ridiculous. Some women literally have cleavage to their necks if they bend over even slightly. It’s not their fault that their body types have been sexualized, they should be able to wear the exact same articles of clothing as anyone else.10 -
Shakashakara wrote: »It’s the double standard for me. And I don’t even mean the one for men vs women. I mean the one for women with a larger chest vs. smaller. It’s so unfair to women who are bigger. Bigger chests are inherently (and wrongfully) viewed as more promiscuous.
I have had many female friends and relatives say to me that they are envious I can wear a v-neck. They don’t feel allowed to, whether because of work dress codes or because of the unwanted attention it brings. Sorry body police, but if someone has larger breasts, they’re going to have more cleavage. Basing a dress code on the amount of cleavage shown is ridiculous. Some women literally have cleavage to their necks if they bend over even slightly. It’s not their fault that their body types have been sexualized, they should be able to wear the exact same articles of clothing as anyone else.
Dude I sexualize everyone equally 🤷🏽♂️... Like all boobs matter 🤷🏽♂️👐🏼...5 -
Mr_Healthy_Habits wrote: »Shakashakara wrote: »It’s the double standard for me. And I don’t even mean the one for men vs women. I mean the one for women with a larger chest vs. smaller. It’s so unfair to women who are bigger. Bigger chests are inherently (and wrongfully) viewed as more promiscuous.
I have had many female friends and relatives say to me that they are envious I can wear a v-neck. They don’t feel allowed to, whether because of work dress codes or because of the unwanted attention it brings. Sorry body police, but if someone has larger breasts, they’re going to have more cleavage. Basing a dress code on the amount of cleavage shown is ridiculous. Some women literally have cleavage to their necks if they bend over even slightly. It’s not their fault that their body types have been sexualized, they should be able to wear the exact same articles of clothing as anyone else.
Dude I sexualize everyone equally 🤷🏽♂️... Like all boobs matter 🤷🏽♂️👐🏼...
Well I know YOU do 😏1 -
I guess if I can get the floors swept and mopped on top of everything else before she's even out of bed... All it really means is that I was *kitten* dynamite... 😏😂3
-
Shakashakara wrote: »It’s the double standard for me. And I don’t even mean the one for men vs women. I mean the one for women with a larger chest vs. smaller. It’s so unfair to women who are bigger. Bigger chests are inherently (and wrongfully) viewed as more promiscuous.
I have had many female friends and relatives say to me that they are envious I can wear a v-neck. They don’t feel allowed to, whether because of work dress codes or because of the unwanted attention it brings. Sorry body police, but if someone has larger breasts, they’re going to have more cleavage. Basing a dress code on the amount of cleavage shown is ridiculous. Some women literally have cleavage to their necks if they bend over even slightly. It’s not their fault that their body types have been sexualized, they should be able to wear the exact same articles of clothing as anyone else.
Yup. You said this all very well. None of it offends me. But if someone like me (or many others) had the plunging neckline/bathing suit etc that I’ve seen posted here it would be deleted QUICKLY. Same thing irl. A regular tank top and people think it’s something revealing. 🤷🏻♀️
I know people on both sides deal with their own set of issues. It’s unfortunate.4 -
Shakashakara wrote: »It’s the double standard for me. And I don’t even mean the one for men vs women. I mean the one for women with a larger chest vs. smaller. It’s so unfair to women who are bigger. Bigger chests are inherently (and wrongfully) viewed as more promiscuous.
I have had many female friends and relatives say to me that they are envious I can wear a v-neck. They don’t feel allowed to, whether because of work dress codes or because of the unwanted attention it brings. Sorry body police, but if someone has larger breasts, they’re going to have more cleavage. Basing a dress code on the amount of cleavage shown is ridiculous. Some women literally have cleavage to their necks if they bend over even slightly. It’s not their fault that their body types have been sexualized, they should be able to wear the exact same articles of clothing as anyone else.
Yup. You said this all very well. None of it offends me. But if someone like me (or many others) had the plunging neckline/bathing suit etc that I’ve seen posted here it would be deleted QUICKLY. Same thing irl. A regular tank top and people think it’s something revealing. 🤷🏻♀️
I know people on both sides deal with their own set of issues. It’s unfortunate.
I deleted a photo here from the selfie thread a month or so ago because I was concerned about being "policed" over the plunging neckline, even though no nudity is being shown. I've had photos taken down here before simply because there was cleavage shown (even though everything was covered and even if I don't wear a bra, I really can't prevent cleavage in certain tops/dresses).
Part of what bothers me is not only is it women with larger chests who get targeted here, but it seems if you don't meet the epitome of what users here consider "beautiful", you'll be a target, too.. especially if you dare to show ANY skin.
That's part of the reason I rarely post photos at all anymore.
I also find it incredibly sad that others here have to edit/alter their photos to cover up their cleavage line in a SPORTS bra with a silly sticker just to avoid issues here.
8 -
On topic of the thread: My family has too much stuff. I am confronted with this every time we move, yet I can't seem to get anyone outside of myself to cut down on or let go of things... but also, I have a very bad habit (or good depending on how you look at it) of holding onto craft materials and for years in the hopes that I'll use it and save money in the process.
And to be fair, I do, however.. all this stuff is taking up space and kinda stressing me out. Unfortunately, I can only work on my tiny third of the mess. I can't force other people to get rid of or throw out their stuff.. and that's becoming an issue for me considering how wound up I get over unkempt or cluttered spaces (depression and anxiety get much worse in cluttered, closed-off spaces than open and clean ones). I can only spend so much of my day cleaning up said spaces to ensure they remain uncluttered.4 -
Shakashakara wrote: »Mr_Healthy_Habits wrote: »Shakashakara wrote: »It’s the double standard for me. And I don’t even mean the one for men vs women. I mean the one for women with a larger chest vs. smaller. It’s so unfair to women who are bigger. Bigger chests are inherently (and wrongfully) viewed as more promiscuous.
I have had many female friends and relatives say to me that they are envious I can wear a v-neck. They don’t feel allowed to, whether because of work dress codes or because of the unwanted attention it brings. Sorry body police, but if someone has larger breasts, they’re going to have more cleavage. Basing a dress code on the amount of cleavage shown is ridiculous. Some women literally have cleavage to their necks if they bend over even slightly. It’s not their fault that their body types have been sexualized, they should be able to wear the exact same articles of clothing as anyone else.
Dude I sexualize everyone equally 🤷🏽♂️... Like all boobs matter 🤷🏽♂️👐🏼...
Well I know YOU do 😏
You know... I better walk that back...
I don't sexualize everyone equally 😂...
Like wtf am I kidding 😂... What kinda virtue signaling *kitten* was that 😂...
Only I could virtue signal about sexualizing people 😂...4 -
Shakashakara wrote: »It’s the double standard for me. And I don’t even mean the one for men vs women. I mean the one for women with a larger chest vs. smaller. It’s so unfair to women who are bigger. Bigger chests are inherently (and wrongfully) viewed as more promiscuous.
I have had many female friends and relatives say to me that they are envious I can wear a v-neck. They don’t feel allowed to, whether because of work dress codes or because of the unwanted attention it brings. Sorry body police, but if someone has larger breasts, they’re going to have more cleavage. Basing a dress code on the amount of cleavage shown is ridiculous. Some women literally have cleavage to their necks if they bend over even slightly. It’s not their fault that their body types have been sexualized, they should be able to wear the exact same articles of clothing as anyone else.
@Shakashakara
These V-Necks of yours..... exactly how low do they go ??
I'm asking for a friend.
.3
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 390 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 921 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions