Calorie Goals
Options
![ayannabayer](https://dakd0cjsv8wfa.cloudfront.net/images/photos/user/5845/829c/f6ab/dd32/c8b0/8192/a868/4b2a56ce28e824a5966be717932412110f41.jpg)
ayannabayer
Posts: 153 Member
I've been eating a lot of veggies and they literally have no calories. My goal is 1,600 calories a day. But ive obly been reaching at most 900. I have been making meals and being very satisfied with them. I never feel hungry after or full. Should I add more calories to my diet some how even tho my meals have been perfect for me? Do I NEED more calories?
-2
Replies
-
In order to keep your body running and not cause any health problems, yes. Add in calorie dense foods to your day, and make sure your logging is as accurate as possible (chances are you're eating more than 900 already unless you're weighing your foods, but better to be safe than sorry)0
-
Yes, and you need nutrients that you're probably not getting in your veggies. You need protein and fat.0
-
Yes you do. You need to meet minimum nutritional needs of a human body, which you're not doing at 900 calories per day. Your MFP calculated goal includes the deficit needed to lose weight ... eating less than 60% of that goal is unhealthy.
This thread makes it look as though you quit the magic bean pudding diet you touted less than two weeks ago.-1 -
brianpperkins wrote: »Yes you do. You need to meet minimum nutritional needs of a human body, which you're not doing at 900 calories per day. Your MFP calculated goal includes the deficit needed to lose weight ... eating less than 60% of that goal is unhealthy.
This thread makes it look as though you quit the magic bean pudding diet you touted less than two weeks ago.
I actually finished part 1 of that and it went really good. But as the recipes went on I didnt really like them so I just pushed that book to the side and creates my own diet.0 -
You could be weeks into a healthy, sustainable plan if you listened to the advice given when you first stared asking about detoxes. In stead, you've gone from fad to fad rather than listening to the sound advice you received and in the process proved the majority correct on the topic of your previous diet plans being unsustainable.
You need to net at least 1200 calories ... closer to your goal would be better, there is a reason why the calculators arrived at that total. You need to hit your macro goals. The other option is to continue on on unhealthy path. Your choice.0 -
There are no vegetables with "literally no calories".0
-
0
-
Literally no calories?
Please share these magical veggies with us.0 -
If you think that the veggies you're eating literally have no calories, then I question the accuracy of your logging. You're probably eating more than you think you are.0
-
I suspect she meant, vegetables have very few calories....0
-
christinev297 wrote: »I suspect she meant, vegetables have very few calories....
Then she literally used the wrong word.
Either way, I think if someone says they are full and satisfied on 900 calories, it is worth questioning if their logging is correct.0 -
Remember the media, mags, IDK, but "they" were claiming that there was negative calorie veggies and fruit. Ohhhh, I so wanted that to be true!
But, yeah, i'm sure the OP (hopefully) meant very few calories in the veg.0 -
She posted a fair question. If you know so much, but can only share your knowledge by being a jerk, go away. Your kind of help doesn't help others, it only helps your horrible ego.
Yes, ayannabayer, eat to meet your net calorie goals for the day. That's how it works. Like you I am trying to eat more fresh veggies but my snack of sliced bell pepper only added 9 calories! A cup of broccoli only 32. I sometimes feel satisfied before hitting my net calories but I am going to work harder to do so. I might add some juice to my breakfast starting next week and squeeze in another piece of fruit.
Good luck!0 -
-
Remember the media, mags, IDK, but "they" were claiming that there was negative calorie veggies and fruit. Ohhhh, I so wanted that to be true!
But, yeah, i'm sure the OP (hopefully) meant very few calories in the veg.
Maybe that is what she meant. However, given some of OP's prior threads, she may very well believe they have negative calories, or have been mislead by the Weight Watcher's free veggies or whatever it is (I know they're accounted for in a different way), or who knows what? She said they "literally" have no calories.
And janejellyroll is right, if OP is satisfied on what she says is 900 calories, she may want to make sure she is logging accurately.
OP - if your logging is accurate, yes, you should eat the goal MFP tells you to eat, and evaluate your progression after consistently logging for a reasonable period of time, such as 6 weeks.0 -
janejellyroll wrote: »
Also, prior to playing the white knight, you might want to look into OP's posting history.
OP- you are fully aware that 900 calories is not healthy, nor will it be supported in our community.0 -
She posted a fair question. If you know so much, but can only share your knowledge by being a jerk, go away. Your kind of help doesn't help others, it only helps your horrible ego.
Yes, ayannabayer, eat to meet your net calorie goals for the day. That's how it works. Like you I am trying to eat more fresh veggies but my snack of sliced bell pepper only added 9 calories! A cup of broccoli only 32. I sometimes feel satisfied before hitting my net calories but I am going to work harder to do so. I might add some juice to my breakfast starting next week and squeeze in another piece of fruit.
Good luck!
Congratulations on being the only one resorting to name calling. The fact you then followed that by agreeing with what everyone else told her made me laugh.
0 -
janejellyroll wrote: »Literally no calories?
Please share these magical veggies with us.
I mean the calories don't add up to much. But they fill me up. So I didn't see any point of eating more0 -
@wahoowad I recommend you relook your logging ... both intake and burn. Unless you're in the 400 pound range, your walking burns are grossly exaggerated. Over the past week, you've repeatedly logged in the neighborhood of 1,000 net calories which is far below the recommended minimums for an adult male human.
Just a couple quick observations.0 -
ayannabayer wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »Literally no calories?
Please share these magical veggies with us.
I mean the calories don't add up to much. But they fill me up. So I didn't see any point of eating more
If you are logging correctly and only eating 900 calories, you should be aware that very low calorie diets put you at risk for significant health problems. That is the point of eating more.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392.1K Introduce Yourself
- 43.6K Getting Started
- 259.9K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.4K Fitness and Exercise
- 403 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions