Does the term "cutting" bother you?

"Cutting" also has some negative associations. Every time I read a post which uses "cutting" I immediately think the person is suicidal. Maybe it's just me?

Wouldn't something like "curbing" or "trimming" or "thinning" be just as good?
«13456713

Replies

  • joejccva71
    joejccva71 Posts: 2,985 Member
    "Cutting" has been used for years in reference to dieting down. When I think of "trimming" or "thinning" i think of hair.

    *shrug*
  • This content has been removed.
  • malibu927
    malibu927 Posts: 17,562 Member
    On here? No, as that's basically what it is...cutting the fat off your body. Now, if they were discussing depression/self-harm, then yes I would be bothered.
  • Liftng4Lis
    Liftng4Lis Posts: 15,151 Member
    It's just you.
  • JordisTSM
    JordisTSM Posts: 359 Member
    Nope. Because context.
  • girlviernes
    girlviernes Posts: 2,402 Member
    I don't love any of the common terms like "cutting," "shredding," etc. Not sure why, they just hit me the wrong way. I never thought about the term in its self-injury meaning, though.
  • LazyCatPame
    LazyCatPame Posts: 112 Member
    Well... English is not my mother tongue, and besides the literal meaning of the word, I first came across with the Self-harm meaning cutting; then I realized that as many English words, it´s a matter of context. I mean, it would be very ugly if 15 posters in a row were (self-harm) cutting, don´t you think?
  • geotrice
    geotrice Posts: 274 Member
    Yeah, no I get that it's a common term. I'm not discounting it. I understand that it's referencing cutting calories from your diet. From that perspective it's fine. Not ideal or precise, in my opinion. But I get it.

    But there's another aspect: it's often used as an antonym to "bulking". Bulking implies adding weight or size to the body. I guess, for me, the duality doesn't really hold up between the terms. One is about the changing the body, the other is about changing the diet. Combine that with the unintentional overlap with the unfortunate meaning and it seems a bit problematic. Especially if the focus on "cutting calories" should be done in a healthy way.

    Don't mind me...just picking nits. Again maybe it's just me. :neutral:
  • callsitlikeiseeit
    callsitlikeiseeit Posts: 8,626 Member
    no more than my kid talking about cutting a piece of paper.

    context, dude.
  • kikichewie
    kikichewie Posts: 276 Member
    Oh please. Let's not start that crap.
  • geotrice
    geotrice Posts: 274 Member
    no more than my kid talking about cutting a piece of paper.

    context, dude.

    Right, but cutting a piece of paper is literally what one does to paper. Unless you're cutting a piece of meat with kitchen scissors or cutting a cake you're not really cutting calories, you're removing or reducing them.
  • geotrice
    geotrice Posts: 274 Member
    kikichewie wrote: »
    Oh please. Let's not start that crap.

    #byefelecia
  • Rlavigne93
    Rlavigne93 Posts: 119 Member
    It doesn't exactly bother me, but I was definitely alarmed the first few times I saw people using the term.
  • Dreamyriver
    Dreamyriver Posts: 91 Member
    geotrice wrote: »
    no more than my kid talking about cutting a piece of paper.

    context, dude.

    Right, but cutting a piece of paper is literally what one does to paper. Unless you're cutting a piece of meat with kitchen scissors or cutting a cake you're not really cutting calories, you're removing or reducing them.

    You know that words have different meanings according to context?
    6 Reduce the amount or quantity of:
    buyers will bargain hard to cut the cost of the house they want
    I should cut down my sugar intake
    [NO OBJECT]: they’ve cut back on costs
    we’re looking to cut down on the use of chemicals

    Oxford Dictionaries
  • zyxst
    zyxst Posts: 9,148 Member
    kikichewie wrote: »
    Oh please. Let's not start that crap.
    tumblr_m8r8a8PRx61qjemo2o1_500.gif

    Love to know what you mean by that.

    OT: doesn't bother me. I understand the difference in meaning and I really think it's a perfectly fine word to use in the context.
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member

    kipit6zflcmp.gif

    This is some serious cutting.
  • geotrice
    geotrice Posts: 274 Member
    geotrice wrote: »
    no more than my kid talking about cutting a piece of paper.

    context, dude.

    Right, but cutting a piece of paper is literally what one does to paper. Unless you're cutting a piece of meat with kitchen scissors or cutting a cake you're not really cutting calories, you're removing or reducing them.

    You know that words have different meanings according to context?
    6 Reduce the amount or quantity of:
    buyers will bargain hard to cut the cost of the house they want
    I should cut down my sugar intake
    [NO OBJECT]: they’ve cut back on costs
    we’re looking to cut down on the use of chemicals

    Oxford Dictionaries

    Yes. I am aware of contextual meaning. In the examples you provided the object being cut were also used (costs, sugar, chemicals). "Cutting calories" does not give me the associations of self harm. "Cutting" (by itself) does however, at least initially. I know on these forums the "calories" is implied. But again maybe it's just me.
  • marissafit06
    marissafit06 Posts: 1,996 Member
    It makes me think about a song that has nothing to do with self harm. But it doesn't bother me at all.
  • blankiefinder
    blankiefinder Posts: 3,599 Member
    geotrice wrote: »
    Yeah, no I get that it's a common term. I'm not discounting it. I understand that it's referencing cutting calories from your diet. From that perspective it's fine. Not ideal or precise, in my opinion. But I get it.

    But there's another aspect: it's often used as an antonym to "bulking". Bulking implies adding weight or size to the body. I guess, for me, the duality doesn't really hold up between the terms. One is about the changing the body, the other is about changing the diet. Combine that with the unintentional overlap with the unfortunate meaning and it seems a bit problematic. Especially if the focus on "cutting calories" should be done in a healthy way.

    Don't mind me...just picking nits. Again maybe it's just me. :neutral:

    They are both about changing the body. Losing fat and some muscle, or adding muscle and some fat... seems like antonyms to me.

    I have enough in life to worry about to not worry about something so little.
  • livingleanlivingclean
    livingleanlivingclean Posts: 11,751 Member
    I usually say I'm "prepping" as when I'm losing weight it's during preparation for a competition. Sounds better to me :)
  • manderson27
    manderson27 Posts: 3,510 Member
    Lots of words have more than one meaning but more importantly different connotations we associate with that word based on our experience.

    For example Home is often associated with warmth comfort and love but for some people it is quite the opposite.

    Maybe it is more your personal connotations that make it an unpleasant word for you rather than the meaning of the word itself.

  • geotrice
    geotrice Posts: 274 Member
    I usually say I'm "prepping" as when I'm losing weight it's during preparation for a competition. Sounds better to me :)
    I do like that. Though prepping is short for preparing. One prepares for an for an event like a competition. What if you are just in a reduction phase without an associated event?
  • geotrice
    geotrice Posts: 274 Member
    geotrice wrote: »
    Yeah, no I get that it's a common term. I'm not discounting it. I understand that it's referencing cutting calories from your diet. From that perspective it's fine. Not ideal or precise, in my opinion. But I get it.

    But there's another aspect: it's often used as an antonym to "bulking". Bulking implies adding weight or size to the body. I guess, for me, the duality doesn't really hold up between the terms. One is about the changing the body, the other is about changing the diet. Combine that with the unintentional overlap with the unfortunate meaning and it seems a bit problematic. Especially if the focus on "cutting calories" should be done in a healthy way.

    Don't mind me...just picking nits. Again maybe it's just me. :neutral:

    They are both about changing the body. Losing fat and some muscle, or adding muscle and some fat... seems like antonyms to me.

    I have enough in life to worry about to not worry about something so little.

    Language reflects and informs how you perceive the world around you. If there's an opportunity to improve language, why shouldn't we examine the idea?
  • sjohnny
    sjohnny Posts: 56,142 Member
    geotrice wrote: »
    I usually say I'm "prepping" as when I'm losing weight it's during preparation for a competition. Sounds better to me :)
    I do like that. Though prepping is short for preparing. One prepares for an for an event like a competition. What if you are just in a reduction phase without an associated event?

    You tell us. You seem to be troubled by words so you tell the rest of the world what you want us to call it and I'm sure everyone will agree so as not to give you the heeby-jeebies.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    I really like the term, actually, because it's an alternative with a more positive meaning to "diet" in my mind. Diet tend to convey to me a focus on being overly fat and unhappy with your body and just wanting to get smaller, to have a lower number on the scale. Cutting, because of its association with body building, seems to me to be focused on fat loss specifically in the context of wanting to increase overall the lean mass percentage and fitness and, especially, a greater sense of empowerment with respect to your body, vs. the almost self-loathing that to me gets associated with dieting.

    Sure, I know the self-abuse context too, but as noted above, context is everything.

    That it would be problematic if literal doesn't bother me, lots of English terms would be. Language is often not literal.
  • livingleanlivingclean
    livingleanlivingclean Posts: 11,751 Member
    geotrice wrote: »
    I usually say I'm "prepping" as when I'm losing weight it's during preparation for a competition. Sounds better to me :)
    I do like that. Though prepping is short for preparing. One prepares for an for an event like a competition. What if you are just in a reduction phase without an associated event?

    I hope not to be in that position again....
    I haven't lost anything for something that wasn't comp prep for 4 years! I'm starting prep again in June, then going to reverse diet and hopefully just get to a point where I'm happy with my physique and slowly just adding muscle without forcing it or intentionally trying to grow.
  • PikaKnight
    PikaKnight Posts: 34,971 Member
    edited April 2015
    geotrice wrote: »
    Yeah, no I get that it's a common term. I'm not discounting it. I understand that it's referencing cutting calories from your diet. From that perspective it's fine. Not ideal or precise, in my opinion. But I get it.

    But there's another aspect: it's often used as an antonym to "bulking". Bulking implies adding weight or size to the body. I guess, for me, the duality doesn't really hold up between the terms. One is about the changing the body, the other is about changing the diet. Combine that with the unintentional overlap with the unfortunate meaning and it seems a bit problematic. Especially if the focus on "cutting calories" should be done in a healthy way.

    Don't mind me...just picking nits. Again maybe it's just me. :neutral:

    Ummm no. Both cutting and bulking is about changing weight/size of the body, not necessarily what you eat. I have people on my FL that eat the same things in a cut as they do a bulk..just more or less depending on the stage.

    And I don't understand how this somehow makes cutting calories healthy or unhealthy?
  • geotrice
    geotrice Posts: 274 Member
    Lots of words have more than one meaning but more importantly different connotations we associate with that word based on our experience.

    For example Home is often associated with warmth comfort and love but for some people it is quite the opposite.

    Maybe it is more your personal connotations that make it an unpleasant word for you rather than the meaning of the word itself.

    Maybe. The connotations I bring to my interpretation of a word could be very different from others approaching the same word.

    Should a commonly used slang term, which have more than one meaning? Isn't that the fundamental problem with jargon and lingo? Wouldn't a precise and dedicated term be more appropriate? If one doesn't exist can and should a dedicated word be created? One free of other possible associations?
  • sjohnny
    sjohnny Posts: 56,142 Member
    geotrice wrote: »
    Lots of words have more than one meaning but more importantly different connotations we associate with that word based on our experience.

    For example Home is often associated with warmth comfort and love but for some people it is quite the opposite.

    Maybe it is more your personal connotations that make it an unpleasant word for you rather than the meaning of the word itself.

    Maybe. The connotations I bring to my interpretation of a word could be very different from others approaching the same word.

    Should a commonly used slang term, which have more than one meaning? Isn't that the fundamental problem with jargon and lingo? Wouldn't a precise and dedicated term be more appropriate? If one doesn't exist can and should a dedicated word be created? One free of other possible associations?

    Sure. Go ahead.
  • PikaKnight
    PikaKnight Posts: 34,971 Member
    geotrice wrote: »
    Lots of words have more than one meaning but more importantly different connotations we associate with that word based on our experience.

    For example Home is often associated with warmth comfort and love but for some people it is quite the opposite.

    Maybe it is more your personal connotations that make it an unpleasant word for you rather than the meaning of the word itself.

    Maybe. The connotations I bring to my interpretation of a word could be very different from others approaching the same word.

    Should a commonly used slang term, which have more than one meaning? Isn't that the fundamental problem with jargon and lingo? Wouldn't a precise and dedicated term be more appropriate? If one doesn't exist can and should a dedicated word be created? One free of other possible associations?

    Oh? Do you know how many words have different meanings depending on context? You going to change them all?