nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Does the term "cutting" bother you?

geotrice

"Cutting" also has some negative associations. Every time I read a post which uses "cutting" I immediately think the person is suicidal. Maybe it's just me?

Wouldn't something like "curbing" or "trimming" or "thinning" be just as good?

Replies

geotrice

dufus12 wrote: »

lets be honest - we know what cutting means...........and the OP has had fun with us and no doubt is laughing *kitten* off that we even wasted time debating issue. Kudos to him. More fool us,

The point wasn't to make you feel foolish. But I do admit, I chuckled at some of the gifs.

geotrice

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

That's all I'm saying. *tears up*

*tear like crying, welling up, not like cutting, ripping

emily_stew wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

No it wasn't completely ridiculous. But the idea of term policing and creating a new word so it doesn't set anyone off is where the absurdity comes into play.

People come up with new words all the time. Every year new words are added the dictionary. That's not absurd. At some point "bestie" wasn't a word, now it is. Why can't there be a word dedicated to describing losing weight by eating at a deficit? Or more than one so there's synonyms to describe it with different emphapses?

http://public.oed.com/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/march-2014-update/new-words-list-march-2014/

You mean dieting?

I'd say CICO but it isn't technically a word and it's a term/concept that could be used to cover both maintaining and bulking.

Dieting, while commonly used to mean eating less, it can also mean eating with restrictions and not necessarily at a caloric deficit. Like going on a paleo diet or vegan diet. Those people would be dieting but may also be bulking or maintaining. A new word could end up being a synonym for dieting, but the emphasis should be on the caloric deficit.

PikaKnight

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

That's all I'm saying. *tears up*

*tear like crying, welling up, not like cutting, ripping

emily_stew wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

No it wasn't completely ridiculous. But the idea of term policing and creating a new word so it doesn't set anyone off is where the absurdity comes into play.

People come up with new words all the time. Every year new words are added the dictionary. That's not absurd. At some point "bestie" wasn't a word, now it is. Why can't there be a word dedicated to describing losing weight by eating at a deficit? Or more than one so there's synonyms to describe it with different emphapses?

http://public.oed.com/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/march-2014-update/new-words-list-march-2014/

You mean dieting?

I'd say CICO but it isn't technically a word and it's a term/concept that could be used to cover both maintaining and bulking.

Dieting, while commonly used to mean eating less, it can also mean eating with restrictions and not necessarily at a caloric deficit. Like going on a paleo diet or vegan diet. Those people would be dieting but may also be bulking or maintaining. A new word could end up being a synonym for dieting, but the emphasis should be on the caloric deficit.

Don't you think you're unnecessarily complicating this?

geotrice

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

That's all I'm saying. *tears up*

*tear like crying, welling up, not like cutting, ripping

emily_stew wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

No it wasn't completely ridiculous. But the idea of term policing and creating a new word so it doesn't set anyone off is where the absurdity comes into play.

People come up with new words all the time. Every year new words are added the dictionary. That's not absurd. At some point "bestie" wasn't a word, now it is. Why can't there be a word dedicated to describing losing weight by eating at a deficit? Or more than one so there's synonyms to describe it with different emphapses?

http://public.oed.com/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/march-2014-update/new-words-list-march-2014/

You mean dieting?

I'd say CICO but it isn't technically a word and it's a term/concept that could be used to cover both maintaining and bulking.

Dieting, while commonly used to mean eating less, it can also mean eating with restrictions and not necessarily at a caloric deficit. Like going on a paleo diet or vegan diet. Those people would be dieting but may also be bulking or maintaining. A new word could end up being a synonym for dieting, but the emphasis should be on the caloric deficit.

Don't you think you're unnecessarily complicating this?

Maybe. I think it's more like looking for the right tool for the job. A tool box may have lots of screw drivers and a flathead will usually make do, but sometimes a Philips head is the right tool for the job.

unknown

This content has been removed.

unknown

This content has been removed.

PikaKnight

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

That's all I'm saying. *tears up*

*tear like crying, welling up, not like cutting, ripping

emily_stew wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

No it wasn't completely ridiculous. But the idea of term policing and creating a new word so it doesn't set anyone off is where the absurdity comes into play.

People come up with new words all the time. Every year new words are added the dictionary. That's not absurd. At some point "bestie" wasn't a word, now it is. Why can't there be a word dedicated to describing losing weight by eating at a deficit? Or more than one so there's synonyms to describe it with different emphapses?

http://public.oed.com/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/march-2014-update/new-words-list-march-2014/

You mean dieting?

I'd say CICO but it isn't technically a word and it's a term/concept that could be used to cover both maintaining and bulking.

Dieting, while commonly used to mean eating less, it can also mean eating with restrictions and not necessarily at a caloric deficit. Like going on a paleo diet or vegan diet. Those people would be dieting but may also be bulking or maintaining. A new word could end up being a synonym for dieting, but the emphasis should be on the caloric deficit.

Don't you think you're unnecessarily complicating this?

Maybe. I think it's more like looking for the right tool for the job. A tool box may have lots of screw drivers and a flathead will usually make do, but sometimes a Philips head is the right tool for the job.

And so can a coin be used, depending on the screw. Or a flat head used to open a can of paint. In other words, you make due with what you have and be flexible and realize it is possible for something to be used in different ways.

And that you don't always need separate/specific or complicated tools for one screw/job.

geotrice

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

That's all I'm saying. *tears up*

*tear like crying, welling up, not like cutting, ripping

emily_stew wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

No it wasn't completely ridiculous. But the idea of term policing and creating a new word so it doesn't set anyone off is where the absurdity comes into play.

People come up with new words all the time. Every year new words are added the dictionary. That's not absurd. At some point "bestie" wasn't a word, now it is. Why can't there be a word dedicated to describing losing weight by eating at a deficit? Or more than one so there's synonyms to describe it with different emphapses?

http://public.oed.com/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/march-2014-update/new-words-list-march-2014/

You mean dieting?

I'd say CICO but it isn't technically a word and it's a term/concept that could be used to cover both maintaining and bulking.

Dieting, while commonly used to mean eating less, it can also mean eating with restrictions and not necessarily at a caloric deficit. Like going on a paleo diet or vegan diet. Those people would be dieting but may also be bulking or maintaining. A new word could end up being a synonym for dieting, but the emphasis should be on the caloric deficit.

Don't you think you're unnecessarily complicating this?

Maybe. I think it's more like looking for the right tool for the job. A tool box may have lots of screw drivers and a flathead will usually make do, but sometimes a Philips head is the right tool for the job.

And so can a coin be used, depending on the screw. Or a flat head used to open a can of paint. In other words, you make due with what you have and be flexible and realize it is possible for something to be used in different ways.

And that you don't always need separate/specific or complicated tools for one screw/job.

But sometimes you do need separate and specific tools for a job. You need a Pentalobe screwdriver to work on an Apple product. Maybe it's unnecessarily complicated, but when is the English language not unnecessarily complicated? But that's missing the point.

My point is that maybe we need to make it necessarily complicated because the one tool isn't getting the job done in the best way possible.

PikaKnight

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

That's all I'm saying. *tears up*

*tear like crying, welling up, not like cutting, ripping

emily_stew wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

No it wasn't completely ridiculous. But the idea of term policing and creating a new word so it doesn't set anyone off is where the absurdity comes into play.

People come up with new words all the time. Every year new words are added the dictionary. That's not absurd. At some point "bestie" wasn't a word, now it is. Why can't there be a word dedicated to describing losing weight by eating at a deficit? Or more than one so there's synonyms to describe it with different emphapses?

http://public.oed.com/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/march-2014-update/new-words-list-march-2014/

You mean dieting?

I'd say CICO but it isn't technically a word and it's a term/concept that could be used to cover both maintaining and bulking.

Dieting, while commonly used to mean eating less, it can also mean eating with restrictions and not necessarily at a caloric deficit. Like going on a paleo diet or vegan diet. Those people would be dieting but may also be bulking or maintaining. A new word could end up being a synonym for dieting, but the emphasis should be on the caloric deficit.

Don't you think you're unnecessarily complicating this?

Maybe. I think it's more like looking for the right tool for the job. A tool box may have lots of screw drivers and a flathead will usually make do, but sometimes a Philips head is the right tool for the job.

And so can a coin be used, depending on the screw. Or a flat head used to open a can of paint. In other words, you make due with what you have and be flexible and realize it is possible for something to be used in different ways.

And that you don't always need separate/specific or complicated tools for one screw/job.

But sometimes you do need separate and specific tools for a job. You need a Pentalobe screwdriver to work on an Apple product. Maybe it's unnecessarily complicated, but when is the English language not unnecessarily complicated? But that's missing the point.

My point is that maybe we need to make it necessarily complicated because the one tool isn't getting the job done in the best way possible.

Except, in this case, the term is fine.

joejccva71

You couldn't have atleast picked a better topic for a forum on a Friday night? I can't even believe this has gone 7 pages. Why am I even answering this?

PikaKnight

joejccva71 wrote: »

You couldn't have atleast picked a better topic for a forum on a Friday night? I can't even believe this has gone 7 pages. Why am I even answering this?

Because the good weekend topics haven't started?

geotrice

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

That's all I'm saying. *tears up*

*tear like crying, welling up, not like cutting, ripping

emily_stew wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

No it wasn't completely ridiculous. But the idea of term policing and creating a new word so it doesn't set anyone off is where the absurdity comes into play.

People come up with new words all the time. Every year new words are added the dictionary. That's not absurd. At some point "bestie" wasn't a word, now it is. Why can't there be a word dedicated to describing losing weight by eating at a deficit? Or more than one so there's synonyms to describe it with different emphapses?

http://public.oed.com/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/march-2014-update/new-words-list-march-2014/

You mean dieting?

I'd say CICO but it isn't technically a word and it's a term/concept that could be used to cover both maintaining and bulking.

Dieting, while commonly used to mean eating less, it can also mean eating with restrictions and not necessarily at a caloric deficit. Like going on a paleo diet or vegan diet. Those people would be dieting but may also be bulking or maintaining. A new word could end up being a synonym for dieting, but the emphasis should be on the caloric deficit.

Don't you think you're unnecessarily complicating this?

Maybe. I think it's more like looking for the right tool for the job. A tool box may have lots of screw drivers and a flathead will usually make do, but sometimes a Philips head is the right tool for the job.

And so can a coin be used, depending on the screw. Or a flat head used to open a can of paint. In other words, you make due with what you have and be flexible and realize it is possible for something to be used in different ways.

And that you don't always need separate/specific or complicated tools for one screw/job.

But sometimes you do need separate and specific tools for a job. You need a Pentalobe screwdriver to work on an Apple product. Maybe it's unnecessarily complicated, but when is the English language not unnecessarily complicated? But that's missing the point.

My point is that maybe we need to make it necessarily complicated because the one tool isn't getting the job done in the best way possible.

Except, in this case, the term is fine.

Again...

And that's fine. You're entitled to it. But I'm still entitled to mine.

unknown

This content has been removed.

PikaKnight

MrM27 wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

That's all I'm saying. *tears up*

*tear like crying, welling up, not like cutting, ripping

emily_stew wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

No it wasn't completely ridiculous. But the idea of term policing and creating a new word so it doesn't set anyone off is where the absurdity comes into play.

People come up with new words all the time. Every year new words are added the dictionary. That's not absurd. At some point "bestie" wasn't a word, now it is. Why can't there be a word dedicated to describing losing weight by eating at a deficit? Or more than one so there's synonyms to describe it with different emphapses?

http://public.oed.com/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/march-2014-update/new-words-list-march-2014/

You mean dieting?

I'd say CICO but it isn't technically a word and it's a term/concept that could be used to cover both maintaining and bulking.

Dieting, while commonly used to mean eating less, it can also mean eating with restrictions and not necessarily at a caloric deficit. Like going on a paleo diet or vegan diet. Those people would be dieting but may also be bulking or maintaining. A new word could end up being a synonym for dieting, but the emphasis should be on the caloric deficit.

Don't you think you're unnecessarily complicating this?

Maybe. I think it's more like looking for the right tool for the job. A tool box may have lots of screw drivers and a flathead will usually make do, but sometimes a Philips head is the right tool for the job.

And so can a coin be used, depending on the screw. Or a flat head used to open a can of paint. In other words, you make due with what you have and be flexible and realize it is possible for something to be used in different ways.

And that you don't always need separate/specific or complicated tools for one screw/job.

But sometimes you do need separate and specific tools for a job. You need a Pentalobe screwdriver to work on an Apple product. Maybe it's unnecessarily complicated, but when is the English language not unnecessarily complicated? But that's missing the point.

My point is that maybe we need to make it necessarily complicated because the one tool isn't getting the job done in the best way possible.

Except, in this case, the term is fine.

Again...

And that's fine. You're entitled to it. But I'm still entitled to mine.

Then why are you insisting people change the way they think and speak?

geotrice

PikaKnight wrote: »

joejccva71 wrote: »

You couldn't have atleast picked a better topic for a forum on a Friday night? I can't even believe this has gone 7 pages. Why am I even answering this?

Because the good weekend topics haven't started?

Because questioning the status quo makes for good drama?

PikaKnight

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

joejccva71 wrote: »

You couldn't have atleast picked a better topic for a forum on a Friday night? I can't even believe this has gone 7 pages. Why am I even answering this?

Because the good weekend topics haven't started?

Because questioning the status quo makes for good drama?

So you've decided to make this your crusade? Really? :laugh:

geotrice

MrM27 wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

That's all I'm saying. *tears up*

*tear like crying, welling up, not like cutting, ripping

emily_stew wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

No it wasn't completely ridiculous. But the idea of term policing and creating a new word so it doesn't set anyone off is where the absurdity comes into play.

People come up with new words all the time. Every year new words are added the dictionary. That's not absurd. At some point "bestie" wasn't a word, now it is. Why can't there be a word dedicated to describing losing weight by eating at a deficit? Or more than one so there's synonyms to describe it with different emphapses?

http://public.oed.com/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/march-2014-update/new-words-list-march-2014/

You mean dieting?

I'd say CICO but it isn't technically a word and it's a term/concept that could be used to cover both maintaining and bulking.

Dieting, while commonly used to mean eating less, it can also mean eating with restrictions and not necessarily at a caloric deficit. Like going on a paleo diet or vegan diet. Those people would be dieting but may also be bulking or maintaining. A new word could end up being a synonym for dieting, but the emphasis should be on the caloric deficit.

Don't you think you're unnecessarily complicating this?

Maybe. I think it's more like looking for the right tool for the job. A tool box may have lots of screw drivers and a flathead will usually make do, but sometimes a Philips head is the right tool for the job.

And so can a coin be used, depending on the screw. Or a flat head used to open a can of paint. In other words, you make due with what you have and be flexible and realize it is possible for something to be used in different ways.

And that you don't always need separate/specific or complicated tools for one screw/job.

But sometimes you do need separate and specific tools for a job. You need a Pentalobe screwdriver to work on an Apple product. Maybe it's unnecessarily complicated, but when is the English language not unnecessarily complicated? But that's missing the point.

My point is that maybe we need to make it necessarily complicated because the one tool isn't getting the job done in the best way possible.

Except, in this case, the term is fine.

Again...

And that's fine. You're entitled to it. But I'm still entitled to mine.

Then why are you insisting people change the way they think and speak?

I'm not insisting. I'm challenging. You can keep on doing whatever you want. I just wrote a post asking a yes or no question and am having a conversation with responders.

SLLRunner

geotrice wrote: »

"Cutting" also has some negative associations. Every time I read a post which uses "cutting" I immediately think the person is suicidal. Maybe it's just me?

Wouldn't something like "curbing" or "trimming" or "thinning" be just as good?

I know exactly what you're talking about. When I first joined MFP, I saw a threat titled something like, "Anybody Want to Cut with Me?" I remember my heart skipping a beat and going into total shock. I immediately thought he was talking about physical cutting, then came to my senses and realized the forum powers-to-be would have something to say about a post like this. Anyway, I decided to just ask what cutting was. The OP explained to me it was another word for losing fat.

However, even with that experience, I have nothing against the term cutting as used for losing weight.

geotrice

SLLRunner wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

"Cutting" also has some negative associations. Every time I read a post which uses "cutting" I immediately think the person is suicidal. Maybe it's just me?

Wouldn't something like "curbing" or "trimming" or "thinning" be just as good?

I know exactly what you're talking about. When I first joined MFP, I saw a threat titled something like, "Anybody Want to Cut with Me?" I remember my heart skipping a beat and going into total shock. I immediately thought he was talking about physical cutting, then came to my senses and realized the forum powers-to-be would have something to say about a post like this. Anyway, I decided to just ask what cutting was. The OP explained to me it was another word for losing fat.

However, even with that experience, I have nothing against the term cutting as used for losing weight.

Exactly.

barbecuesauce

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

OdesAngel wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

OdesAngel wrote: »

Cut the cheese.

Using the verb to cut in Cutting the cheese is like cutting calories. It's fine. But smelly.
The problem, for me, only appears if you say cutting without a specified object.

So saying cutting without a specified object.....bothers you?

Mildly. If you were talking to someone, maybe a stranger or loose acquaintance, and you say, "I'm cutting again." What does that person think you're doing again? What someone says that you should start cutting? The meaning is derived solely by context, because the word cut it used so vaguely. Wouldn't a word that specifically means to cut calories be useful? That's all I'm saying.

Except I've found a lot of people don't just randomly talk about cuts and bulks with strangers or random acquaintances, and usually talk in those terms with people that they know who share the same interest in that regard.

Maybe because using those terms with people outside of the MFP community would not understand or misinterpret the meaning? So now imagine the new people on the forums. Unfamiliar with community's assumed meaning they too could misinterpret the meaning. And if the meaning is self harm, you don't see a problem? If say a person is overweight, depressed, and looking for help to lose weight and then they see people using the term cutting, you're telling me you can't possibly see how that could be a problem? Or at the very least uninviting to the community?

But once you're in the community, don't you pick up the jargon? I didn't ever apply the concept of "deficit" to the concept of calories before coming here, even though I had lost 20 pounds.

As someone who self-harmed as a teenager and has struggled with depression, after I learned this use of the term, it did not bother me at all. "To cut" is probably one of the more common verbs in our language. One negative usage can't ruin all of the myriad other applications.

unknown

This content has been removed.

LolBroScience

I prefer dieting in a caloric surplus

geotrice

barbecuesauce wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

OdesAngel wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

OdesAngel wrote: »

Cut the cheese.

Using the verb to cut in Cutting the cheese is like cutting calories. It's fine. But smelly.
The problem, for me, only appears if you say cutting without a specified object.

So saying cutting without a specified object.....bothers you?

Mildly. If you were talking to someone, maybe a stranger or loose acquaintance, and you say, "I'm cutting again." What does that person think you're doing again? What someone says that you should start cutting? The meaning is derived solely by context, because the word cut it used so vaguely. Wouldn't a word that specifically means to cut calories be useful? That's all I'm saying.

Except I've found a lot of people don't just randomly talk about cuts and bulks with strangers or random acquaintances, and usually talk in those terms with people that they know who share the same interest in that regard.

Maybe because using those terms with people outside of the MFP community would not understand or misinterpret the meaning? So now imagine the new people on the forums. Unfamiliar with community's assumed meaning they too could misinterpret the meaning. And if the meaning is self harm, you don't see a problem? If say a person is overweight, depressed, and looking for help to lose weight and then they see people using the term cutting, you're telling me you can't possibly see how that could be a problem? Or at the very least uninviting to the community?

But once you're in the community, don't you pick up the jargon? I didn't ever apply the concept of "deficit" to the concept of calories before coming here, even though I had lost 20 pounds.

As someone who self-harmed as a teenager and has struggled with depression, after I learned this use of the term, it did not bother me at all. "To cut" is probably one of the more common phrases in our language. One negative usage can't ruin all of the myriad other applications.

True and thank you for sharing. I admitted that this could be nit-picking.

unknown

This content has been removed.

geotrice

MrM27 wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

MrM27 wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

That's all I'm saying. *tears up*

*tear like crying, welling up, not like cutting, ripping

emily_stew wrote: »

lemonsnowdrop wrote: »

Y'know, I kinda understand where OP is coming from. Sure, the word "cutting" has many different meanings depending on the context, but rarely do you use it as a solo verb. When you now the lawn, you don't say, "I'm going cutting," and you don't say "Oh, I'm just cutting" when you're trying to reduce your expenses. There's usually a recipient to the verb to make the sentence more comprehensive. Also, self-harm can be very triggering, and I can see how the word could very well be a trigger for someone. I know we're not expected to police our vernacular, but it's not like OP was completely ridiculous.

No it wasn't completely ridiculous. But the idea of term policing and creating a new word so it doesn't set anyone off is where the absurdity comes into play.

People come up with new words all the time. Every year new words are added the dictionary. That's not absurd. At some point "bestie" wasn't a word, now it is. Why can't there be a word dedicated to describing losing weight by eating at a deficit? Or more than one so there's synonyms to describe it with different emphapses?

http://public.oed.com/the-oed-today/recent-updates-to-the-oed/march-2014-update/new-words-list-march-2014/

You mean dieting?

I'd say CICO but it isn't technically a word and it's a term/concept that could be used to cover both maintaining and bulking.

Dieting, while commonly used to mean eating less, it can also mean eating with restrictions and not necessarily at a caloric deficit. Like going on a paleo diet or vegan diet. Those people would be dieting but may also be bulking or maintaining. A new word could end up being a synonym for dieting, but the emphasis should be on the caloric deficit.

Don't you think you're unnecessarily complicating this?

Maybe. I think it's more like looking for the right tool for the job. A tool box may have lots of screw drivers and a flathead will usually make do, but sometimes a Philips head is the right tool for the job.

And so can a coin be used, depending on the screw. Or a flat head used to open a can of paint. In other words, you make due with what you have and be flexible and realize it is possible for something to be used in different ways.

And that you don't always need separate/specific or complicated tools for one screw/job.

But sometimes you do need separate and specific tools for a job. You need a Pentalobe screwdriver to work on an Apple product. Maybe it's unnecessarily complicated, but when is the English language not unnecessarily complicated? But that's missing the point.

My point is that maybe we need to make it necessarily complicated because the one tool isn't getting the job done in the best way possible.

Except, in this case, the term is fine.

Again...

And that's fine. You're entitled to it. But I'm still entitled to mine.

Then why are you insisting people change the way they think and speak?

I'm not insisting. I'm challenging. You can keep on doing whatever you want. I just wrote a post asking a yes or no question and am having a conversation with responders.

Challenging people to say what exactly? What should the term be changed to?

geotrice wrote: »

SLLRunner wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

"Cutting" also has some negative associations. Every time I read a post which uses "cutting" I immediately think the person is suicidal. Maybe it's just me?

Wouldn't something like "curbing" or "trimming" or "thinning" be just as good?

I know exactly what you're talking about. When I first joined MFP, I saw a threat titled something like, "Anybody Want to Cut with Me?" I remember my heart skipping a beat and going into total shock. I immediately thought he was talking about physical cutting, then came to my senses and realized the forum powers-to-be would have something to say about a post like this. Anyway, I decided to just ask what cutting was. The OP explained to me it was another word for losing fat.

However, even with that experience, I have nothing against the term cutting as used for losing weight.

Exactly.

So you agree that you also have nothing against the term. I guess the thread is over right?

I guess for you...sure. No ones making you stay in this thread.

sweetdixie92

barbecuesauce wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

OdesAngel wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

OdesAngel wrote: »

Cut the cheese.

Using the verb to cut in Cutting the cheese is like cutting calories. It's fine. But smelly.
The problem, for me, only appears if you say cutting without a specified object.

So saying cutting without a specified object.....bothers you?

Mildly. If you were talking to someone, maybe a stranger or loose acquaintance, and you say, "I'm cutting again." What does that person think you're doing again? What someone says that you should start cutting? The meaning is derived solely by context, because the word cut it used so vaguely. Wouldn't a word that specifically means to cut calories be useful? That's all I'm saying.

Except I've found a lot of people don't just randomly talk about cuts and bulks with strangers or random acquaintances, and usually talk in those terms with people that they know who share the same interest in that regard.

Maybe because using those terms with people outside of the MFP community would not understand or misinterpret the meaning? So now imagine the new people on the forums. Unfamiliar with community's assumed meaning they too could misinterpret the meaning. And if the meaning is self harm, you don't see a problem? If say a person is overweight, depressed, and looking for help to lose weight and then they see people using the term cutting, you're telling me you can't possibly see how that could be a problem? Or at the very least uninviting to the community?

But once you're in the community, don't you pick up the jargon? I didn't ever apply the concept of "deficit" to the concept of calories before coming here, even though I had lost 20 pounds.

As someone who self-harmed as a teenager and has struggled with depression, after I learned this use of the term, it did not bother me at all. "To cut" is probably one of the more common phrases in our language. One negative usage can't ruin all of the myriad other applications.

+1

It's as simple as learning to read in context. The term "cutting" for eliminating calories is not an MFP community term only. I see it often from weight lifters.

By the way, I'm going to a rodeo tomorrow and will be cutting cattle...I'll leave that to your imagination since it only has a negative meaning apparently

unknown

This content has been removed.

Christine_72

SconnieCat wrote: »

If we're talking about words people don't want to use anymore for one reason or another...can we also throw the word "panties" in the ring? That word is my trigger.

UUggghhhh I HATE that word!
If we're talking about certain words conjuring certain thoughts... "Panties" is something I'd imagine a pedophile saying

unknown

This content has been removed.

geotrice

sweetdixie92 wrote: »

barbecuesauce wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

PikaKnight wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

OdesAngel wrote: »

geotrice wrote: »

OdesAngel wrote: »

Cut the cheese.

Using the verb to cut in Cutting the cheese is like cutting calories. It's fine. But smelly.
The problem, for me, only appears if you say cutting without a specified object.

So saying cutting without a specified object.....bothers you?

Mildly. If you were talking to someone, maybe a stranger or loose acquaintance, and you say, "I'm cutting again." What does that person think you're doing again? What someone says that you should start cutting? The meaning is derived solely by context, because the word cut it used so vaguely. Wouldn't a word that specifically means to cut calories be useful? That's all I'm saying.

Except I've found a lot of people don't just randomly talk about cuts and bulks with strangers or random acquaintances, and usually talk in those terms with people that they know who share the same interest in that regard.

Maybe because using those terms with people outside of the MFP community would not understand or misinterpret the meaning? So now imagine the new people on the forums. Unfamiliar with community's assumed meaning they too could misinterpret the meaning. And if the meaning is self harm, you don't see a problem? If say a person is overweight, depressed, and looking for help to lose weight and then they see people using the term cutting, you're telling me you can't possibly see how that could be a problem? Or at the very least uninviting to the community?

But once you're in the community, don't you pick up the jargon? I didn't ever apply the concept of "deficit" to the concept of calories before coming here, even though I had lost 20 pounds.

As someone who self-harmed as a teenager and has struggled with depression, after I learned this use of the term, it did not bother me at all. "To cut" is probably one of the more common phrases in our language. One negative usage can't ruin all of the myriad other applications.

+1

It's as simple as learning to read in context. The term "cutting" for eliminating calories is not an MFP community term only. I see it often from weight lifters.

By the way, I'm going to a rodeo tomorrow and will be cutting cattle...I'll leave that to your imagination since it only has a negative meaning apparently

Cutting calories vs cutting.
Cutting cattle vs cutting.
Cutting costs vs cutting.
Cutting paper vs cutting.
Cutting teeth vs cutting.

Leave out the object and what does the term mean?