inappropriate question... but i want to know. so please no judging.. if dont like the question just
Options
Replies
-
nutmegoreo wrote: »EvgeniZyntx wrote: »smadaris91 wrote: »smadaris91 wrote: »smadaris91 wrote: »
Could you be more specific
UMM lol idk lol I don't want to get graphic and get flagged lol
This sex sounds awful
no lol nothing weird more like the fifty shades of grey
Poorly written and with a small vocabulary?
I do tend to judge a guy by the size of his vocabulary
ROFL
So glad to see this thread is still going.0 -
As the owner of cunninglinguists.com, I'm getting a kick out of these replies..
Seriously though, you should see peoples' reactions when I give my email address out.0 -
greg88rosen wrote: »Haha if you get sore from sex it might be time to hit the gym
You can tell your male lol0 -
smadaris91 wrote: »http://www.livestrong.com/article/297695-how-many-calories-are-burned-during-sex/
that's where we found the most info. but idk it says the average 150lb person burns 216 calories in 45 minutes
Nah. That's bull.
It's part of daily activity, therefore included in your activity level.
0 -
daniwilford wrote: »Things that you can't count extra burns for and stay in a deficit: REM sleep, sex, bowel movements, eating/digesting a big meal, etc. even if you think you put more gusto into it than the average bear.
Now, this is great!0 -
flyingtanuki wrote: »Well, we've pretty well covered the in and out of it.
Does that mean you finished early?
0 -
smadaris91 wrote: »TavistockToad wrote: »smadaris91 wrote: »smadaris91 wrote: »so I guess the truth is no one has the answer lol its just an enigma
Sunny Megatron did a segment about this on one of her shows. It was interesting to see the results. If I remember correctly, when compared to the same amount of time spent on a treadmill you do burn less calories than a vigorous sex session.
However, sex would be a lot more fun than the treadmill even though it's not quite the same as far as a workout.
WOW very interesting
Love how you're only taking notice of the posts you agree with OP... Why make the thread in the first place when you don't actually want advice from people?
because I want to know how many calories it burns. not if people should log it????
Really.....doubtful it's enough calories to log, which is why it's included in your activity level already.0 -
flyingtanuki wrote: »Well, that pretty well covers the in and out of it. This thread is obviously past its climax and there is little need to probe further.
No one leaves until we are all done :laugh:0 -
smadaris91 wrote: »Sorry i didn't have any one else to ask so I'm asking MFP community.
(Not intended to be nasty, just human curiosity, we all do it)
0 -
flyingtanuki wrote: »flyingtanuki wrote: »Well, we've pretty well covered the in and out of it.
Does that mean you finished early?
Maybe that's a little premature, but seems the subject has been well penetrated.
Don't go getting soft on us now.0 -
Ok...stating the obvious but the more people are involved....not sure I should (or need to) finish this.0
-
I tweeted MFP asking if i could just put sex down as 30mins of uphill biking and they wouldn't give me a straight answer0
-
blankiefinder wrote:Increased heart rate does not equal increased calorie burn
Just like when you walk (as opposed to sitting still) your leg muscles are working harder & burning more calories.
The difference (in slow v. fast heart rate) isn't great, but usually that accompanies other muscular activity, which
does burn more calories. The heart speeds up (as does breathing) to get more oxygen to those other muscles
that are working harder.
0 -
blankiefinder wrote:Increased heart rate does not equal increased calorie burn
Just like when you walk (as opposed to sitting still) your leg muscles are working harder & burning more calories.
The difference (in slow v. fast heart rate) isn't great, but usually that accompanies other muscular activity, which
does burn more calories. The heart speeds up (as does breathing) to get more oxygen to those other muscles
that are working harder.
except....NO.
when i watch a thrilling movie, my pulse quickens. am i burning more calories? what about when I ride a roller coaster? get pulled over by the police?0 -
blankiefinder wrote:Increased heart rate does not equal increased calorie burn
Just like when you walk (as opposed to sitting still) your leg muscles are working harder & burning more calories.
The difference (in slow v. fast heart rate) isn't great, but usually that accompanies other muscular activity, which
does burn more calories. The heart speeds up (as does breathing) to get more oxygen to those other muscles
that are working harder.
I get nervous and my heart rate gets elevated, therefore I am burning more calories?
I start smooching my beau and my heart rate gets more elevated, therefore I am burning more calories?
I get a really fast heartbeat because of some underlying medical issue, therefore I am burning more calories?
Any working of muscles that is not actual cardio exercise is part of one's activity level.
0 -
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 398 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 977 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions