Who here counts calories

12357

Replies

  • blankiefinder
    blankiefinder Posts: 3,599 Member
    mccindy72 wrote: »
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    Just remember one thing. It's not just counting calories. It's the quality of those calories. Like avoiding all the fun places we go to. Starbucks, DD, McDonald's, etc. Those are very bad for you. Or just be sure to choose the lesser of all evils. Like fraps and lattes for just coffee. A Donut for an Egg White Sandwich.

    I totally agree with you. Fun is so overrated.

    because dieting should be on par with being tortured during the Inquisition....

    ^^^^ You get it!

    Gluttony is a sin, no?

    So one must do penance.

    (Since McD's and DD seem like the anti-fun to me, I guess I should go there.)

    For the record, and because I may sound like a grouch, I'm not anti-donut. Someone in my office brought in donuts from Stan's this morning so I decided to eat half of one as my post-workout snack. I'm going to fit it in my calories. ;-)

    Am I supported in this?

    There are gluten free donuts. I just can't bring myself to try them. I think they'd be made of either lead or air and disappointment.

    I have. Some are good, some are not. They are not as good as the gluten-filled kind, and they WAY more expensive. So kind of not worth it. The glazed kind, by Kinnickinnick (sp?) isn't bad, if you warm them up.

    One of these days (when I'm healthy) I am going to hit the Kinnikinnick bakery and pick up some fresh cinnamon buns, donuts and cream puffs! If only it wasn't 30 minutes away, and I already spend so many hours a day driving...
  • Azuriaz
    Azuriaz Posts: 785 Member
    senecarr wrote: »
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    Just remember one thing. It's not just counting calories. It's the quality of those calories. Like avoiding all the fun places we go to. Starbucks, DD, McDonald's, etc. Those are very bad for you. Or just be sure to choose the lesser of all evils. Like fraps and lattes for just coffee. A Donut for an Egg White Sandwich.

    I totally agree with you. Fun is so overrated.

    because dieting should be on par with being tortured during the Inquisition....

    ^^^^ You get it!

    Gluttony is a sin, no?

    So one must do penance.

    (Since McD's and DD seem like the anti-fun to me, I guess I should go there.)

    For the record, and because I may sound like a grouch, I'm not anti-donut. Someone in my office brought in donuts from Stan's this morning so I decided to eat half of one as my post-workout snack. I'm going to fit it in my calories. ;-)

    Am I supported in this?

    There are gluten free donuts. I just can't bring myself to try them. I think they'd be made of either lead or air and disappointment.
    Gluten free, glutton free :D
    No wonder that fad has taken off

    There was a website that actually had a typo where it said glutton free cookies but meant gluten free. I sent them in a message and said "I think you mean gluten free, but if you have a glutton free cookie recipe, I'd be very interested."

    :D

    Haha! Sign me up, too!

  • Serah87
    Serah87 Posts: 5,481 Member
    I juice all my calories, lol. ;) Please someone pat me on my back.
  • kk_inprogress
    kk_inprogress Posts: 3,077 Member
    Serah87 wrote: »
    I juice all my calories, lol. ;) Please someone pat me on my back.

    Don't want to pat too hard. You might poop yourself. I hear liquid diets are good for that.
  • zoeysasha37
    zoeysasha37 Posts: 7,088 Member
    Yes I count them...because science ...lol..cico. Its the way to go! Eat at a deficit- weight loss
    Eat at a surplus,- weight gain :wink:
    So yes calorie counting, using a food scale, logging accurately are very important to me :)
  • zoeysasha37
    zoeysasha37 Posts: 7,088 Member
    Serah87 wrote: »
    I juice all my calories, lol. ;) Please someone pat me on my back.

    Dem toxins......
  • mccindy72
    mccindy72 Posts: 7,001 Member
    mccindy72 wrote: »
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    Just remember one thing. It's not just counting calories. It's the quality of those calories. Like avoiding all the fun places we go to. Starbucks, DD, McDonald's, etc. Those are very bad for you. Or just be sure to choose the lesser of all evils. Like fraps and lattes for just coffee. A Donut for an Egg White Sandwich.

    I totally agree with you. Fun is so overrated.

    because dieting should be on par with being tortured during the Inquisition....

    ^^^^ You get it!

    Gluttony is a sin, no?

    So one must do penance.

    (Since McD's and DD seem like the anti-fun to me, I guess I should go there.)

    For the record, and because I may sound like a grouch, I'm not anti-donut. Someone in my office brought in donuts from Stan's this morning so I decided to eat half of one as my post-workout snack. I'm going to fit it in my calories. ;-)

    Am I supported in this?

    There are gluten free donuts. I just can't bring myself to try them. I think they'd be made of either lead or air and disappointment.

    I have. Some are good, some are not. They are not as good as the gluten-filled kind, and they WAY more expensive. So kind of not worth it. The glazed kind, by Kinnickinnick (sp?) isn't bad, if you warm them up.

    One of these days (when I'm healthy) I am going to hit the Kinnikinnick bakery and pick up some fresh cinnamon buns, donuts and cream puffs! If only it wasn't 30 minutes away, and I already spend so many hours a day driving...

    That's - f-in - amazing. Can I come?
  • blankiefinder
    blankiefinder Posts: 3,599 Member
    There has to be some benefit to living this far north! :) Home of Kinnikinick :grin:
  • queenliz99
    queenliz99 Posts: 15,317 Member
    There has to be some benefit to living this far north! :) Home of Kinnikinick :grin:

    Do you ship? LOL
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    I don't count clean calories, only the dirty ones...
  • Alatariel75
    Alatariel75 Posts: 18,242 Member
    senecarr wrote: »
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    Just remember one thing. It's not just counting calories. It's the quality of those calories. Like avoiding all the fun places we go to. Starbucks, DD, McDonald's, etc. Those are very bad for you. Or just be sure to choose the lesser of all evils. Like fraps and lattes for just coffee. A Donut for an Egg White Sandwich.

    I totally agree with you. Fun is so overrated.

    because dieting should be on par with being tortured during the Inquisition....

    ^^^^ You get it!

    Gluttony is a sin, no?

    So one must do penance.

    (Since McD's and DD seem like the anti-fun to me, I guess I should go there.)

    For the record, and because I may sound like a grouch, I'm not anti-donut. Someone in my office brought in donuts from Stan's this morning so I decided to eat half of one as my post-workout snack. I'm going to fit it in my calories. ;-)

    Am I supported in this?

    There are gluten free donuts. I just can't bring myself to try them. I think they'd be made of either lead or air and disappointment.
    Gluten free, glutton free :D
    No wonder that fad has taken off

    There was a website that actually had a typo where it said glutton free cookies but meant gluten free. I sent them in a message and said "I think you mean gluten free, but if you have a glutton free cookie recipe, I'd be very interested."

    I have a photo on my phone of a pizza menu that got dropped in my mailbox which boasts "glutton free bases!". If MFP ever fixed the app so I could upload pics from my phone, I'd post it.
  • mccindy72
    mccindy72 Posts: 7,001 Member
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    I don't count clean calories, only the dirty ones...

    I'm going to start washing all my calories, then I don't have to count them.
  • shadowfax_c11
    shadowfax_c11 Posts: 1,942 Member
    I don't count mine. I just weigh them all in cups, most some of the time. When I feel like it. Because that's the most accurate way. I just don't understand why I am not losing weight because I know I am eating 1200 calories and I am never hungry so I think I need to eat more. It must be starvation mode.
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,942 Member
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    I don't count clean calories, only the dirty ones...

    Well, you'd be better off if you just washed those calorie first.
  • zoeysasha37
    zoeysasha37 Posts: 7,088 Member
    SLLRunner wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    I don't count clean calories, only the dirty ones...

    Well, you'd be better off if you just washed those calorie first.

    Yes I've heard that thoroughly cleaning foods will remove 30% of the calories. It also helps remove those toxins. ( don't ask me which toxins though because I can't answer that )
  • This content has been removed.
  • arditarose
    arditarose Posts: 15,573 Member
    I count calories and I did lose some weight, still figuring out how to loose it though.
  • Alluminati
    Alluminati Posts: 6,208 Member
    I only count the calories that come out of a box or a package. Or the ones I can't pronounce. Or the ones my ancestors wouldn't have eaten.

    Mmmmm....grubs and long pig.
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,942 Member
    thorsmom01 wrote: »
    SLLRunner wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    I don't count clean calories, only the dirty ones...

    Well, you'd be better off if you just washed those calorie first.

    Yes I've heard that thoroughly cleaning foods will remove 30% of the calories. It also helps remove those toxins. ( don't ask me which toxins though because I can't answer that )

    I thought cleaning foods removed 40% of the calories, so I guess my intake logging in my diary is underestimated again.....
  • Alatariel75
    Alatariel75 Posts: 18,242 Member
    I only count the calories that come out of a box or a package. Or the ones I can't pronounce. Or the ones my ancestors wouldn't have eaten.

    I only consume things that were available in my grandmother's time. My lard pudding is amazing and that Thalidomide I took this morning is very relaxing..
  • queenliz99
    queenliz99 Posts: 15,317 Member
    I only count the calories that come out of a box or a package. Or the ones I can't pronounce. Or the ones my ancestors wouldn't have eaten.

    I only consume things that were available in my grandmother's time. My lard pudding is amazing and that Thalidomide I took this morning is very relaxing..

    That's almost not funny. LOL
  • Alatariel75
    Alatariel75 Posts: 18,242 Member
    queenliz99 wrote: »
    I only count the calories that come out of a box or a package. Or the ones I can't pronounce. Or the ones my ancestors wouldn't have eaten.

    I only consume things that were available in my grandmother's time. My lard pudding is amazing and that Thalidomide I took this morning is very relaxing..

    That's almost not funny. LOL

    I just wish I could still get Coca Cola with real cocaine in it. No wonder Gramma was such a blast at parties.
  • stevencloser
    stevencloser Posts: 8,911 Member
    arditarose wrote: »
    I count calories and I did lose some weight, still figuring out how to loose it though.

    You want to loose it? I want myself to get less loose.
    Wait that sounds wrong.
  • sashayoung72
    sashayoung72 Posts: 441 Member
    I don't count mine. I just weigh them all in cups, most some of the time. When I feel like it. Because that's the most accurate way. I just don't understand why I am not losing weight because I know I am eating 1200 calories and I am never hungry so I think I need to eat more. It must be starvation mode.
    ^^^^^
    THIS LOL
  • LaceyBirds
    LaceyBirds Posts: 451 Member
    I don't count mine. I just weigh them all in cups, most some of the time. When I feel like it. Because that's the most accurate way. I just don't understand why I am not losing weight because I know I am eating 1200 calories and I am never hungry so I think I need to eat more. It must be starvation mode.

    Starvation mode is a myth, much like CICO, IIFYM, LOTW and AFLAC (although I believe the duck is real). Also, the cake is a lie. You need to eat 42 small meals a day and eat them in accordance with the Fibonacci sequence. You may find this reference book helpful: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Da_Vinci_Code
  • senecarr
    senecarr Posts: 5,377 Member
    LaceyBirds wrote: »
    I don't count mine. I just weigh them all in cups, most some of the time. When I feel like it. Because that's the most accurate way. I just don't understand why I am not losing weight because I know I am eating 1200 calories and I am never hungry so I think I need to eat more. It must be starvation mode.

    Starvation mode is a myth, much like CICO, IIFYM, LOTW and AFLAC (although I believe the duck is real). Also, the cake is a lie. You need to eat 42 small meals a day and eat them in accordance with the Fibonacci sequence. You may find this reference book helpful: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Da_Vinci_Code
    I haven't heard of LOTW and google is thinking I want a different acronym.
    If the Fibonacci sequence is important, does that mean eating shellfish will always work out? They usually grow their shells in a Fibonacci sequence.
  • LaceyBirds
    LaceyBirds Posts: 451 Member
    Oops, lol, that should be LOTR. Can't even get my own jokes right. :s

    Although your Fibonacci theory is sound, the sad fact is that shellfish are chock full of Freddie Mercury, and eating more than two to three servings a week could lead to a four-octave vocal range, which is a scary thought indeed.
  • senecarr
    senecarr Posts: 5,377 Member
    LaceyBirds wrote: »
    Oops, lol, that should be LOTR. Can't even get my own jokes right. :s

    Although your Fibonacci theory is sound, the sad fact is that shellfish are chock full of Freddie Mercury, and eating more than two to three servings a week could lead to a four-octave vocal range, which is a scary thought indeed.
    As someone who suffers from Higgs Boson Deficiency Syndrome (HBDS) which means the laws of gravity don't apply to me like all other mass in the universe, I find Freddie Mercury very helpful for having establish the alternative theory that fat bottom girls are responsible for the earth's rotation.
  • LaceyBirds
    LaceyBirds Posts: 451 Member
    edited September 2015
    Perhaps a few treatments in the Large Hadron Collider could help with that deficiency? It was a built-in remedy for Khrushchev and Kennedy.
  • nutmegoreo
    nutmegoreo Posts: 15,532 Member
    senecarr wrote: »
    LaceyBirds wrote: »
    Oops, lol, that should be LOTR. Can't even get my own jokes right. :s

    Although your Fibonacci theory is sound, the sad fact is that shellfish are chock full of Freddie Mercury, and eating more than two to three servings a week could lead to a four-octave vocal range, which is a scary thought indeed.
    As someone who suffers from Higgs Boson Deficiency Syndrome (HBDS) which means the laws of gravity don't apply to me like all other mass in the universe, I find Freddie Mercury very helpful for having establish the alternative theory that fat bottom girls are responsible for the earth's rotation.

    So is MFP attempting to disrupt the rotation of the earth with all this weight loss hullaballoo? I knew there was something insidious about this site!
This discussion has been closed.