Cardio isn't for "fat burning".

2456721

Replies

  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    gia07 wrote: »
    Isn't there an increase in a person's metabolic rate from consistent/daily/weekly exercising? This is a huge plus in my book just to exercise (but I am a bit old) LOL

    As the above poster said above, I have lost weight, maintained and gained weight whilst exercising.

    IMHO I think TV shows, magazines, internet jargon, make it out to believe that you must "exercise to loose weight", or at least that is the way it comes across. So people jump on MFP setup a calorie deficit and jump right on the forums and always ask "how many calories do I need to burn a day to loose weight", or "what type of cardio do I need to do to loose XXX pounds by XXX date?"

    Who actually asks how can I improve my cardiovascular health to compliment my weight loss? Not very many.

    yes, you get an increase in calories burned, but the point that niner is making is that this is small and that consistent calorie deficit is really the answer....
  • mike_bold
    mike_bold Posts: 140 Member
    took me more years than I care to mention to figure this out.
  • _Waffle_
    _Waffle_ Posts: 13,049 Member
    For low intensity exercises, is it body fat or dietary fat burned, or both?

    You'll do better if you just think of it as energy. During lower intensity exercises the body will pull some from the muscle cells themselves, and some from blood stream. The blood stream energy will be replenished by energy stored in your liver. Once that is used up it will then use stored body fat for energy. This is released into your blood and is no different than the dietary fat that you've eaten that day which might be remaining. It doesn't wait until your totally out of energy so the stored fat/energy is mixed in with things you may have eaten recently.

    There are strategies for helping your body to prefer stored fat over glycogen but that includes starting the exercise in a fasted state and doing 90+ minutes of exercise. You can run out of glycogen energy storage in your cells too but that's all really outside the scope of this discussion.
  • Kamikazeflutterby
    Kamikazeflutterby Posts: 770 Member
    You can't outrun a bad diet.

    I can out run anything!!!*

    b88.gif


    *As long as it's really, really slow.
  • _Waffle_
    _Waffle_ Posts: 13,049 Member
    gia07 wrote: »
    Isn't there an increase in a person's metabolic rate from consistent/daily/weekly exercising? This is a huge plus in my book just to exercise (but I am a bit old) LOL

    As the above poster said above, I have lost weight, maintained and gained weight whilst exercising.

    IMHO I think TV shows, magazines, internet jargon, make it out to believe that you must "exercise to loose weight", or at least that is the way it comes across. So people jump on MFP setup a calorie deficit and jump right on the forums and always ask "how many calories do I need to burn a day to loose weight", or "what type of cardio do I need to do to loose XXX pounds by XXX date?"

    Who actually asks how can I improve my cardiovascular health to compliment my weight loss? Not very many.

    *raises hand*

    In fact I cared more about this than the actual weight but they're both side-kicks and fixing one helps the other. That is I first cared about getting less winded at 11k+ feet and that triggered my desire to fix other things. Generally however..... "Wedding in 6 weeks! ZOMG!"
  • ScoobaChick
    ScoobaChick Posts: 186 Member
    Being in good cardio vascular health makes you feel fantastic. And that should be enough

    +1
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    gia07 wrote: »
    Isn't there an increase in a person's metabolic rate from consistent/daily/weekly exercising? This is a huge plus in my book just to exercise (but I am a bit old) LOL

    As the above poster said above, I have lost weight, maintained and gained weight whilst exercising.

    IMHO I think TV shows, magazines, internet jargon, make it out to believe that you must "exercise to loose weight", or at least that is the way it comes across. So people jump on MFP setup a calorie deficit and jump right on the forums and always ask "how many calories do I need to burn a day to loose weight", or "what type of cardio do I need to do to loose XXX pounds by XXX date?"

    Who actually asks how can I improve my cardiovascular health to compliment my weight loss? Not very many.

    yes, you get an increase in calories burned, but the point that niner is making is that this is small and that consistent calorie deficit is really the answer....

    Oh I know this... I am just chatting...sorry.
  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    Not sure if this was just a UK ad but I loved it

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxzdo8FfrW0
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member
    _Waffle_ wrote: »
    gia07 wrote: »
    Isn't there an increase in a person's metabolic rate from consistent/daily/weekly exercising? This is a huge plus in my book just to exercise (but I am a bit old) LOL

    As the above poster said above, I have lost weight, maintained and gained weight whilst exercising.

    IMHO I think TV shows, magazines, internet jargon, make it out to believe that you must "exercise to loose weight", or at least that is the way it comes across. So people jump on MFP setup a calorie deficit and jump right on the forums and always ask "how many calories do I need to burn a day to loose weight", or "what type of cardio do I need to do to loose XXX pounds by XXX date?"

    Who actually asks how can I improve my cardiovascular health to compliment my weight loss? Not very many.

    *raises hand*

    In fact I cared more about this than the actual weight but they're both side-kicks and fixing one helps the other. That is I first cared about getting less winded at 11k+ feet and that triggered my desire to fix other things. Generally however..... "Wedding in 6 weeks! ZOMG!"

    I guess I should stop posting again..
  • jeremywm1977
    jeremywm1977 Posts: 657 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    In other news...the sky is up

    You say this, but go ahead and peruse this forum to see the many "Should I start with cardio or strength training to lose weight?", or "How do I get toned abs?", or "I workout an hour everyday, why am I not losing weight?" threads.

    Yes, it should be common knowledge, but this website and it's forum alone shows that it isn't.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    gia07 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    gia07 wrote: »
    Isn't there an increase in a person's metabolic rate from consistent/daily/weekly exercising? This is a huge plus in my book just to exercise (but I am a bit old) LOL

    As the above poster said above, I have lost weight, maintained and gained weight whilst exercising.

    IMHO I think TV shows, magazines, internet jargon, make it out to believe that you must "exercise to loose weight", or at least that is the way it comes across. So people jump on MFP setup a calorie deficit and jump right on the forums and always ask "how many calories do I need to burn a day to loose weight", or "what type of cardio do I need to do to loose XXX pounds by XXX date?"

    Who actually asks how can I improve my cardiovascular health to compliment my weight loss? Not very many.

    yes, you get an increase in calories burned, but the point that niner is making is that this is small and that consistent calorie deficit is really the answer....

    Oh I know this... I am just chatting...sorry.

    no problem..

    I thought you were asking for clarification...
  • _Waffle_
    _Waffle_ Posts: 13,049 Member
    gia07 wrote: »
    _Waffle_ wrote: »
    gia07 wrote: »
    Isn't there an increase in a person's metabolic rate from consistent/daily/weekly exercising? This is a huge plus in my book just to exercise (but I am a bit old) LOL

    As the above poster said above, I have lost weight, maintained and gained weight whilst exercising.

    IMHO I think TV shows, magazines, internet jargon, make it out to believe that you must "exercise to loose weight", or at least that is the way it comes across. So people jump on MFP setup a calorie deficit and jump right on the forums and always ask "how many calories do I need to burn a day to loose weight", or "what type of cardio do I need to do to loose XXX pounds by XXX date?"

    Who actually asks how can I improve my cardiovascular health to compliment my weight loss? Not very many.

    *raises hand*

    In fact I cared more about this than the actual weight but they're both side-kicks and fixing one helps the other. That is I first cared about getting less winded at 11k+ feet and that triggered my desire to fix other things. Generally however..... "Wedding in 6 weeks! ZOMG!"

    I guess I should stop posting again..

    @gia07 I was here first. Stop following me. :P
  • Rabid_Hamster
    Rabid_Hamster Posts: 338 Member
    While the OP is correct, it's a bit misleading. One should do 20+ minutes of cardio to be fat burning. Up to the 20 minute mark (approximately), you're basically burning off the sugars stored in your blood and muscle lining. the general statement is correct that if you are at a consistent calorie deficit, you will lose fat.
  • queenliz99
    queenliz99 Posts: 15,317 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    Not sure if this was just a UK ad but I loved it

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxzdo8FfrW0

    That's what nightmares are made of, thanks ;)
  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    LOL it was a really effective campaign :)
  • senecarr
    senecarr Posts: 5,377 Member
    lemmie177 wrote: »
    Actually, the addition of exercise is much more effective in getting rid of visceral fat(you know, the stuff associated with heart disease, diabetes, stroke, etc) than deficit alone.
    Is there a source for that claim?
  • Wheelhouse15
    Wheelhouse15 Posts: 5,575 Member
    _Waffle_ wrote: »
    gia07 wrote: »
    _Waffle_ wrote: »
    gia07 wrote: »
    Isn't there an increase in a person's metabolic rate from consistent/daily/weekly exercising? This is a huge plus in my book just to exercise (but I am a bit old) LOL

    As the above poster said above, I have lost weight, maintained and gained weight whilst exercising.

    IMHO I think TV shows, magazines, internet jargon, make it out to believe that you must "exercise to loose weight", or at least that is the way it comes across. So people jump on MFP setup a calorie deficit and jump right on the forums and always ask "how many calories do I need to burn a day to loose weight", or "what type of cardio do I need to do to loose XXX pounds by XXX date?"

    Who actually asks how can I improve my cardiovascular health to compliment my weight loss? Not very many.

    *raises hand*

    In fact I cared more about this than the actual weight but they're both side-kicks and fixing one helps the other. That is I first cared about getting less winded at 11k+ feet and that triggered my desire to fix other things. Generally however..... "Wedding in 6 weeks! ZOMG!"

    I guess I should stop posting again..

    @gia07 I was here first. Stop following me. :P

    You know the rules, stalking is only allowed on that "one" forum. ;)
  • hectorh82
    hectorh82 Posts: 110 Member
    haha.. thats why some body builders/protein heads/creatine heads/roiders i know never do cardio lol.. "waist of time" but for me it works .. but to truly "burn fat" you need to eat better and vary your workouts.
  • senecarr
    senecarr Posts: 5,377 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    In other news...the sky is up

    To be fair, it is also down, but like losing via pure exercise, you'd have to go through hell first to get there that way.
  • kimny72
    kimny72 Posts: 16,011 Member
    senecarr wrote: »
    lemmie177 wrote: »
    Actually, the addition of exercise is much more effective in getting rid of visceral fat(you know, the stuff associated with heart disease, diabetes, stroke, etc) than deficit alone.
    Is there a source for that claim?

    I was actually going to ask about this - Does visceral fat behave the same way as other fat? I've read so many silly magazine, clickbait style articles I'm not sure if I've ever read anything legit on it anymore.
  • Wheelhouse15
    Wheelhouse15 Posts: 5,575 Member
    kimny72 wrote: »
    senecarr wrote: »
    lemmie177 wrote: »
    Actually, the addition of exercise is much more effective in getting rid of visceral fat(you know, the stuff associated with heart disease, diabetes, stroke, etc) than deficit alone.
    Is there a source for that claim?

    I was actually going to ask about this - Does visceral fat behave the same way as other fat? I've read so many silly magazine, clickbait style articles I'm not sure if I've ever read anything legit on it anymore.

    It behaves the same as other fat but it's about the fastest burning fat because it tends to have more beta receptors than other areas, particularly lower body fat. My understanding is that it evolved as a fast energy track for activities such as hunting but that could be just speculation.
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    hectorh82 wrote: »
    haha.. thats why some body builders/protein heads/creatine heads/roiders i know never do cardio lol.. "waist of time" but for me it works .. but to truly "burn fat" you need to eat better and vary your workouts.

    Eat better? You mean stay in a deficit? Doesn't matter what you eat (as long as you get min fat and protein) for fat loss. For healthy you also will need vitamins and minerals.
  • _Waffle_
    _Waffle_ Posts: 13,049 Member
    _Waffle_ wrote: »
    gia07 wrote: »
    _Waffle_ wrote: »
    gia07 wrote: »
    Isn't there an increase in a person's metabolic rate from consistent/daily/weekly exercising? This is a huge plus in my book just to exercise (but I am a bit old) LOL

    As the above poster said above, I have lost weight, maintained and gained weight whilst exercising.

    IMHO I think TV shows, magazines, internet jargon, make it out to believe that you must "exercise to loose weight", or at least that is the way it comes across. So people jump on MFP setup a calorie deficit and jump right on the forums and always ask "how many calories do I need to burn a day to loose weight", or "what type of cardio do I need to do to loose XXX pounds by XXX date?"

    Who actually asks how can I improve my cardiovascular health to compliment my weight loss? Not very many.

    *raises hand*

    In fact I cared more about this than the actual weight but they're both side-kicks and fixing one helps the other. That is I first cared about getting less winded at 11k+ feet and that triggered my desire to fix other things. Generally however..... "Wedding in 6 weeks! ZOMG!"

    I guess I should stop posting again..

    @gia07 I was here first. Stop following me. :P

    You know the rules, stalking is only allowed on that "one" forum. ;)

    I keep telling her that but @RoxieDawn keeps following me. I don't know why.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    Lord007 wrote: »
    While the OP is correct, it's a bit misleading. One should do 20+ minutes of cardio to be fat burning. Up to the 20 minute mark (approximately), you're basically burning off the sugars stored in your blood and muscle lining. the general statement is correct that if you are at a consistent calorie deficit, you will lose fat.

    if you do 20 minutes of cardio for fat burning but you are still in a surplus for the day, have you burned any fat??
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    edited March 2016
    While the OP is correct, it's a bit misleading. One should do 20+ minutes of cardio to be fat burning. Up to the 20 minute mark (approximately), you're basically burning off the sugars stored in your blood and muscle lining. ...
    If that was the case to lose fat, then no one could lose without cardio, but you can and many have.
  • ManiacalLaugh
    ManiacalLaugh Posts: 1,048 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    Not sure if this was just a UK ad but I loved it

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxzdo8FfrW0

    That made me laugh and feel uncomfortable at the same time.

    There was an add series similar to that in the US - where people would come across random piles of flesh and comment about how someone had lost their beer belly, spare tire, bubble butt, etc... So gross, but it was actually somewhat motivating (though obviously not for purchasing the product, since I can't remember what the commercial was actually for).
  • jacksonpt
    jacksonpt Posts: 10,413 Member
    edited March 2016
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    Lord007 wrote: »
    While the OP is correct, it's a bit misleading. One should do 20+ minutes of cardio to be fat burning. Up to the 20 minute mark (approximately), you're basically burning off the sugars stored in your blood and muscle lining. the general statement is correct that if you are at a consistent calorie deficit, you will lose fat.

    if you do 20 minutes of cardio for fat burning but you are still in a surplus for the day, have you burned any fat??

    Technically, yes you have. But not enough to be meaningful, and certainly not enough to outweigh the fat you later put on as result of the calorie surplus.
  • StealthHealth
    StealthHealth Posts: 2,417 Member
    Lord007 wrote: »
    While the OP is correct, it's a bit misleading. One should do 20+ minutes of cardio to be fat burning. Up to the 20 minute mark (approximately), you're basically burning off the sugars stored in your blood and muscle lining. the general statement is correct that if you are at a consistent calorie deficit, you will lose fat.

    No form of exercise is required to reach this state- you could sit still and reach that state as long as you weren't replenishing glycogen whilst you were doing it. So, if exercise is not required for fat burning we are back to the position that @ninerbuff (OP) stated.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    jacksonpt wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    Lord007 wrote: »
    While the OP is correct, it's a bit misleading. One should do 20+ minutes of cardio to be fat burning. Up to the 20 minute mark (approximately), you're basically burning off the sugars stored in your blood and muscle lining. the general statement is correct that if you are at a consistent calorie deficit, you will lose fat.

    if you do 20 minutes of cardio for fat burning but you are still in a surplus for the day, have you burned any fat??

    technically, yes. But the fat you later put on as a result of the surplus far outweighs the .000001lb of fat you burned from that exercise.

    I know..it was more of a rhetorical question for that poster...