Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Is dairy good or bad?

1121315171820

Replies

  • This content has been removed.
  • Carlos_421
    Carlos_421 Posts: 5,132 Member
    Carlos_421 wrote: »
    edwardetr wrote: »
    rankinsect wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    bad for you

    & especially for the calf and mother cows

    That depends where you get your milk from. I buy local (the farm is 30 minutes from me), organic, grass fed milk.

    In general dairy cattle are treated quite well - probably among the most pampered of farm animals. Better treated cows produce more milk per cow, and the milk is of better quality.

    Have you ever heard a cow cry for days after her calf was taken away? They are kept in a constant state of lactation and are genetically modified to the point where their utters are so large that they could not even walk. How do you come to the conclusion that they are generally treated well?

    And then they do these kind of mutations to them too for meat:
    mYHqxzt.jpg

    That cow is more jacked than 98% of MFP users. I want his stack.

    It comes from a lack of Myostatin.

    Lack? That doesn't even make sense. You're claiming there is a chemical in the body that naturally keeps you from getting more muscles. Monsanto should come up with better stories when they're making these things.

    That's what he's saying. And he's right.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myostatin

    So Monsanto is giving everyone a chemical to keep muscles from growing, just so they can make their cows look bigger by not putting it in them?

    leb1.gif
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    Deep.
  • hanwatts2016
    hanwatts2016 Posts: 32 Member
    good! :)
  • tomteboda
    tomteboda Posts: 2,171 Member
    I take it back.

    King of Trolls: Far Away
  • This content has been removed.
  • futureicon
    futureicon Posts: 348 Member
    Dairy is good. Dairy Queen now.. thats a whole other story.
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    futureicon wrote: »
    Dairy is good. Dairy Queen now.. thats a whole other story.

    I know. That's GREAT!!
  • lcrampton44
    lcrampton44 Posts: 3 Member
    Milk is bad
    Milk stimulates growth of prostate cancer cells in culture.
    Tate PL1, Bibb R, Larcom LL.
    Author information
    1Healthcare Genetics Program, Department of Nursing, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA.
    Abstract
    Concern has been expressed about the fact that cows' milk contains estrogens and could stimulate the growth of hormone-sensitive tumors. In this study, organic cows' milk and two commercial substitutes were digested in vitro and tested for their effects on the growth of cultures of prostate and breast cancer cells. Cows' milk stimulated the growth of LNCaP prostate cancer cells in each of 14 separate experiments, producing an average increase in growth rate of over 30%. In contrast, almond milk suppressed the growth of these cells by over 30%. Neither cows' milk nor almond milk affected the growth of MCF-7 breast cancer cells or AsPC-1 pancreatic cancer cells significantly. Soy milk increased the growth rate of the breast cancer cells. These data indicate that prostate and breast cancer patients should be cautioned about the possible promotional effects of commercial dairy products and their substitutes.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22043817
  • MissSusieQ
    MissSusieQ Posts: 533 Member
    it's neither.

    one thing it IS is delicious!
  • Gallowmere1984
    Gallowmere1984 Posts: 6,626 Member
    Milk is bad
    Milk stimulates growth of prostate cancer cells in culture.
    Tate PL1, Bibb R, Larcom LL.
    Author information
    1Healthcare Genetics Program, Department of Nursing, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA.
    Abstract
    Concern has been expressed about the fact that cows' milk contains estrogens and could stimulate the growth of hormone-sensitive tumors. In this study, organic cows' milk and two commercial substitutes were digested in vitro and tested for their effects on the growth of cultures of prostate and breast cancer cells. Cows' milk stimulated the growth of LNCaP prostate cancer cells in each of 14 separate experiments, producing an average increase in growth rate of over 30%. In contrast, almond milk suppressed the growth of these cells by over 30%. Neither cows' milk nor almond milk affected the growth of MCF-7 breast cancer cells or AsPC-1 pancreatic cancer cells significantly. Soy milk increased the growth rate of the breast cancer cells. These data indicate that prostate and breast cancer patients should be cautioned about the possible promotional effects of commercial dairy products and their substitutes.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22043817

    You definitely need to stop injecting milk into your prostate cells...

    So wait...do milk enemas count? :-o
  • CorneliusPhoton
    CorneliusPhoton Posts: 965 Member
    edited August 2016
    Milk is bad
    Milk stimulates growth of prostate cancer cells in culture.
    Tate PL1, Bibb R, Larcom LL.
    Author information
    1Healthcare Genetics Program, Department of Nursing, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA.
    Abstract
    Concern has been expressed about the fact that cows' milk contains estrogens and could stimulate the growth of hormone-sensitive tumors. In this study, organic cows' milk and two commercial substitutes were digested in vitro and tested for their effects on the growth of cultures of prostate and breast cancer cells. Cows' milk stimulated the growth of LNCaP prostate cancer cells in each of 14 separate experiments, producing an average increase in growth rate of over 30%. In contrast, almond milk suppressed the growth of these cells by over 30%. Neither cows' milk nor almond milk affected the growth of MCF-7 breast cancer cells or AsPC-1 pancreatic cancer cells significantly. Soy milk increased the growth rate of the breast cancer cells. These data indicate that prostate and breast cancer patients should be cautioned about the possible promotional effects of commercial dairy products and their substitutes.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22043817

    Note that they did not state that it *caused* the cancer. They say that it may promote the growth of existing cancer, if that cancer is hormone-sensitive and gets a milk bath in a lab (likely exposing the cells to higher concentrations than would normally get to similar cells in the body in the same time period). There are a lot of other foods that contain estrogens, but milk and soy have the most.
  • CorneliusPhoton
    CorneliusPhoton Posts: 965 Member
    This study addresses moreso the development of cancer: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16125328
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 49,031 Member
    Depends on your POV. I'm lactose intolerant so I stay away from drinking it, but I eat ice cream, cheese, and yogurt with little issue.
    Dairy ISN'T needed in your diet, though.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png
  • katieann522
    katieann522 Posts: 15 Member
    it is high in fat but if you stick to a portion, it is good.
  • WinoGelato
    WinoGelato Posts: 13,454 Member
    it is high in fat but if you stick to a portion, it is good.

    What if I drink skim milk?
  • Gallowmere1984
    Gallowmere1984 Posts: 6,626 Member
    edited August 2016
    WinoGelato wrote: »
    it is high in fat but if you stick to a portion, it is good.

    What if I drink skim milk?

    You'll get Diet Cancer of the AIDS...or something.
  • Packerjohn
    Packerjohn Posts: 4,855 Member
    Dairy kicks *kitten*. End of story.
  • amusedmonkey
    amusedmonkey Posts: 10,330 Member
    Packerjohn wrote: »
    Dairy kicks *kitten*. End of story.

    That's horrible :(
    No wonder some people hate it...
  • miky619
    miky619 Posts: 5 Member
    nope its not meant for us but hey YU will not die i personaly never liked milk but today milk none should drink(Hormones,fat,puss,parasytes...)almond milk cashew milk so easy to make and its FREAKING DELICIOUS!!! ps dont buy make yourself its so easy to make 100 g of almonds and 500 ml of water 1 L milk even more sometimes ;) have fun
  • pdm3547
    pdm3547 Posts: 1,057 Member
    WinoGelato wrote: »
    it is high in fat but if you stick to a portion, it is good.

    What if I drink skim milk?

    You'll get Diet Cancer of the AIDS...or something.

    Yeah. And full-blown Aids, not just diet-HIV. Proper Aids.
  • Carlos_421
    Carlos_421 Posts: 5,132 Member
    miky619 wrote: »
    nope its not meant for us but hey YU will not die i personaly never liked milk but today milk none should drink(Hormones,fat,puss,parasytes...)almond milk cashew milk so easy to make and its FREAKING DELICIOUS!!! ps dont buy make yourself its so easy to make 100 g of almonds and 500 ml of water 1 L milk even more sometimes ;) have fun

    My, aren't you so blissfully misinformed.
  • sunnybeaches105
    sunnybeaches105 Posts: 2,831 Member
    miky619 wrote: »
    nope its not meant for us but hey YU will not die i personaly never liked milk but today milk none should drink(Hormones,fat,puss,parasytes...)almond milk cashew milk so easy to make and its FREAKING DELICIOUS!!! ps dont buy make yourself its so easy to make 100 g of almonds and 500 ml of water 1 L milk even more sometimes ;) have fun

    Is this meant as a joke?
  • Jruzer
    Jruzer Posts: 3,501 Member
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    What does it even mean to claim that milk is not MEANT for us. If we are able to be nourished by it (and many of us have the genes that allow that), how is it not meant for us in a way that other animals or animal products or plants we eat (like, say, cows themselves or chickens or deer or eggs or almonds or broccoli or bananas are)? This way of looking at it just makes no sense to me. If nothing else it presupposes intelligent design, which is a religious POV, but then doesn't finish out the argument.

    Thanks for pointing that out. You've got it exactly right. To say we are not "meant" to do something is an explicitly religious argument. But these statements are always made implicitly and don't consider what else we are meant or not meant to do.

    I'm totally on board with religious arguments, by the way, but I think they should be made honestly. From my point of view, "milk and honey" are good things. ;)
This discussion has been closed.