Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Alcohol and Society
Replies
-
I think many of us go through lots of mental gymnastics to justify consuming something that actually is bad for you.
Welcome to freedom of choice where one man's sanity is another man's sin. There is no rational beyond your own for what you do. So I drink, but maybe you drive over the speed limit, which is something that is bad for others. Do I get to say my bad is worse than your bad? Or do you justify it by saying 5 mph over is nothing and everyone does it (people just drive slow).
Really I think this thread is about legalizing marijuana.
2 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »CasperNaegle wrote: »"but you do not see the same events happening with heroine or other drugs involved."
What the hell??
I suppose it's true. We've never had heroin at an office Christmas party.
Probably because it's illegal and all, among other reasons.
Not sure why this is meaningful.
That would create some pretty sweet shareholder value though, if all our business meetings consisted of tweakers tweaking on meth. Perhaps with a sprinkle of bath salts. Nom nom nom!2 -
jmbmilholland wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »CasperNaegle wrote: »"but you do not see the same events happening with heroine or other drugs involved."
What the hell??
I suppose it's true. We've never had heroin at an office Christmas party.
Probably because it's illegal and all, among other reasons.
Not sure why this is meaningful.
That would create some pretty sweet shareholder value though, if all our business meetings consisted of tweakers tweaking on meth. Perhaps with a sprinkle of bath salts. Nom nom nom!
Oh sure, it's all fun and games until someone's face gets eaten.8 -
BinaryPulsar wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »I hope my questions above didn't come across as confrontational (someone marking questions as awesome seems odd somehow). I was genuinely curious about the answers. I'm finding the different in perceptions of societies very interesting.
I think the difference of perception is going to greatly depend on a person's life experience. Obviously a non-drinker is going to experience things that a drinker has never experienced or thought about. And vice versa. It's like that with all life experiences. And this is no exception.
I totally have learned how life experiences, and the families in which we are raised, fuel our beliefs about alcohol. I was raised by parents who rarely drank, save for a glass of wine at holiday dinners. Even then, they switched to sparkling cider so my sister and I could participate. They never went to bars. It just wasn't a part of my little world growing up.
My ex-husband was raised in the opposite environment-mom was alcoholic, worked in a bar. Grandfather was an alcoholic. Not violent alcoholics or anything, but it was accepted that heavy drinking was the norm in the family. And he follows suit. He can't understand how I don't want to go to bars, but prefer to have drinks with close friends at home. I don't understand how he can go to a bar alone and just sit there with a beer and chat away all night. I'm not saying it's the reason he's the "ex". But it did lead to some conflict over the years, because what was normal for me wasn't normal for him and visa versa.2 -
Its arguably debated that alcoholism is just as harmful than other unlawful drugs, if not more, because it is legal. I belong to support groups of both and you can't tell the families there it is a difference. Addiction is addiction. And what makes alcohol abuse so alarming is the fact that it is legal. I'm sure this thread wasn't suppose to turn in this direction, but with posters making fun of me because I used a comparison is beyond crazy to me when I stated my opinion.
And lets be clear, I am not saying an occasional drinker is an alcoholic.
http://www.12keysrehab.com/blog/recovery-from-alcohol-vs-heroin
http://alcoholrehab.com/alcoholism/alcohol-more-dangerous-than-heroin/1 -
STLBADGIRL wrote: »Its arguably debated that alcoholism is just as harmful than other unlawful drugs, if not more, because it is legal. I belong to support groups of both and you can't tell the families there it is a difference. Addiction is addiction. And what makes alcohol abuse so alarming is the fact that it is legal. I'm sure this thread wasn't suppose to turn in this direction, but with posters making fun of me because I used a comparison is beyond crazy to me when I stated my opinion.
And lets be clear, I am not saying an occasional drinker is an alcoholic.
http://www.12keysrehab.com/blog/recovery-from-alcohol-vs-heroin
http://alcoholrehab.com/alcoholism/alcohol-more-dangerous-than-heroin/
The thread isn't about alcoholism. It's about society's views on alcohol consumption.1 -
Need2Exerc1se wrote: »STLBADGIRL wrote: »Its arguably debated that alcoholism is just as harmful than other unlawful drugs, if not more, because it is legal. I belong to support groups of both and you can't tell the families there it is a difference. Addiction is addiction. And what makes alcohol abuse so alarming is the fact that it is legal. I'm sure this thread wasn't suppose to turn in this direction, but with posters making fun of me because I used a comparison is beyond crazy to me when I stated my opinion.
And lets be clear, I am not saying an occasional drinker is an alcoholic.
http://www.12keysrehab.com/blog/recovery-from-alcohol-vs-heroin
http://alcoholrehab.com/alcoholism/alcohol-more-dangerous-than-heroin/
The thread isn't about alcoholism. It's about society's views on alcohol consumption.
Got that...and my view is most consume too much and sometimes it crosses over to addiction.0 -
Definitely agree with what people are saying about how we all do something that another person might consider "bad". It's the whole throwing stones from glass houses thing.2
-
STLBADGIRL wrote: »Its arguably debated that alcoholism is just as harmful than other unlawful drugs, if not more, because it is legal. I belong to support groups of both and you can't tell the families there it is a difference. Addiction is addiction. And what makes alcohol abuse so alarming is the fact that it is legal. I'm sure this thread wasn't suppose to turn in this direction, but with posters making fun of me because I used a comparison is beyond crazy to me when I stated my opinion.
No one was making fun of you, but that alcohol is accepted at after work functions (or the Christmas party I mentioned) and heroin is not is hardly, well, surprising and is not informative.
I think we all know that alcohol is socially acceptable. The debate seems to be over whether alcohol abuse is socially acceptable and whether not drinking is socially acceptable. Obviously it depends on the society we are talking about, but my personal experience (and I don't drink) is that the answers are no (not in the society I'm in, I know there are ones where it is) and yes.
We covered the harm from alcohol already, that's not news, but that's largely because it's prevalent, because legal, not because it's exactly like heroin--that alcohol abuse causes harm (or that cigarette smoking causes harm) doesn't mean that it is exactly the same in all ways as other drugs which cause harm. Part of that (not the only part, IMO) is the cultural role of alcohol.
I don't agree that what makes alcohol abuse so alarming is that it's legal. Wasn't it alarming during Prohibition too?2 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »STLBADGIRL wrote: »Its arguably debated that alcoholism is just as harmful than other unlawful drugs, if not more, because it is legal. I belong to support groups of both and you can't tell the families there it is a difference. Addiction is addiction. And what makes alcohol abuse so alarming is the fact that it is legal. I'm sure this thread wasn't suppose to turn in this direction, but with posters making fun of me because I used a comparison is beyond crazy to me when I stated my opinion.
No one was making fun of you
This ^^
Offering a differing opinion is not making fun it's discussion. Isn't that what forums are for?1 -
Here's my two cents:
Yes, as a society (and we can probably just say "the West," not just "North America"), we drink way too much. It is ridiculous that anti-tobacco campaigns are more prevalent than anti-alcohol ones. It's ridiculous that alcohol, dangerous that it is, is legal while marijuana is not (not everywhere in the U.S., anyway, and it's still looked upon with MUCH MORE stigma than alcohol is). Better believe that, if the marijuana haters out there had it, they would be showing us all of the data about how pot kills (when there's much better data on alcohol and it's relationship to death and disease, both immediate and delayed).
However, I have to admit my absolute love for it! Not just as a consumable, but as an institution! A world-wide commonality! It's almost kind of endearing that we, as a race, find escapism so desirable (I know, not everyone, but it's no coincidence that people discovered and held on to alcohol all over the world). I should declare that I am a self-described functional alcoholic, in case that shows bias. I had a profession in Denmark who had shared a theory that humanity gave up the hunter-gatherer lifestyle (fresh meat) for agriculture (grain, which, back in the day, could pretty much be made into cold porridge... or maybe warm porridge). He agreed that the discovery of ferment-able grain and alcohol ultimately led to humanity giving up the H-G lifestyle. I'm sure people in here will poke plenty of holes in that one and I'm certainly not taking credit for it, but, again, it's something that endears all of humanity to me.
The fact that monks came up with so many concoctions that brought them closer to their religion. It's no surprise that some of our dearest and tastiest spirits, liqueurs and cordials are named after monk sects (chartreuse, benedictine, Trappist ales, champagne, etc.). I think you could wrap up intoxicants, generally, into this category as well, at least as concerns our races fixation with, well, not feeling like ourselves.
As much as the race would benefit from absolute removal of all alcohol, it sort of feels like removing film and visual art, music, creative architecture, etc.
Just my two cents... or more like five.3 -
Oh, man! Are we too butt hurt to keep talking?! I was just getting excited!2
-
JustinAnimal wrote: »Oh, man! Are we too butt hurt to keep talking?! I was just getting excited!
:laugh:0 -
doggerland wrote: »Karb_Kween wrote: »BinaryPulsar wrote: »There are really only about two people doing the extreme no alcohol judgement thing in this thread. Meh, who cares. It's like when there is a thread about sex and people come in to say: I have never had a one night stand because I am classy. It's fine to never have a one night stand. It's following it with a stupid judgement that makes the whole environment feel uncomfortable and awkward. Like this thread that could have been an interesting conversation, but now it's just dealing with the judgment and reactions. Definitely a dumpster fire now.
I'm scared to say anything because I imbibe
I do, too. Sometimes more than I would prefer, but not in the quantities I used to.
My thoughts about alcohol and society are around how alcohol use by women seems to be increasing. I just started reading this book "Drink: The Intimate Relationship Between Women and Alcohol" - https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00BATKXMU/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1https://amazon.com/dp/B00BATKXMU/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1 so far, it's been really interesting.
I read this also. I thought it was an interesting book.0 -
I'd respond after reading this entire thread, but it would probably drive me to drinkSTLBADGIRL wrote: »Its arguably debated that alcoholism is just as harmful than other unlawful drugs, if not more, because it is legal. I belong to support groups of both and you can't tell the families there it is a difference. Addiction is addiction. And what makes alcohol abuse so alarming is the fact that it is legal. I'm sure this thread wasn't suppose to turn in this direction, but with posters making fun of me because I used a comparison is beyond crazy to me when I stated my opinion.
And lets be clear, I am not saying an occasional drinker is an alcoholic.
http://www.12keysrehab.com/blog/recovery-from-alcohol-vs-heroin
http://alcoholrehab.com/alcoholism/alcohol-more-dangerous-than-heroin/
Yea, and drugs should be legal too. If you don't want to drink then don't drink. I'm pretty much done with busybodies trying to tell other people what to eat, who to have sex with, and what they can smoke and drink. You're on the wrong side of history. Get used to it.3 -
I also think that because alcohol is legal and accepted, it's significantly harder for the problem drinker to a) admit the problem and b) solve the problem.
The statements and behaviors of all the normal drinkers in the thread are ones I have used myself to mask my personal issues:
"I love a nice red with a juicy steak" *doesn't eat steak, drinks two bottles of wine*
"I only drink craft beer" *10 at a time*
"Everyone in my social circle drinks" *as much in a year as I do in a week*
In my early 20s I had an amphetamine problem. I addressed it by: destroying a key on some railroad tracks, losing a couple phone numbers, and avoiding a certain area of my hometown. I could be confident that sitting on the couch watching college football, I would not be bombarded with amphetamine ads. I could go out to eat anywhere and not worry about whether the place served amphetamine. At dinner parties, no one was going to offer me amphetamine and ask me "Why not?" if I summoned the will to say I don't use.
None of that is to say that the world needs to bend to me so that I can stay sober. I am responsible for myself, and for the foreseeable future I have to avoid certain places and people. I guess my point is, well, it just sucks.
On the bright side, I'm about to go run a 5K. That's something I could not have imagined whilst drinking.9 -
There definitely isn't anything wrong with examining the challenges you faced. Talking openly about it. That can help others that might be going through the same thing. Discussion doesn't hurt. People can walk away from discussion. No one is forcing them to read or hear it. But, it can help others that need it. And it can help people understand different people's experiences.2
-
I don't agree that it's harder for the problem drinker to admit to the problem. IME, problem drinkers who make those kinds of excuses (and I did myself) know they are lying to themselves. (As IMO your own examples demonstrate.)2
-
Hangover-free booze could replace the rough stuff by 2050
http://www.theprovince.com/technology/science/hangover+free+booze+could+replace+rough+stuff+2050/12218177/story.html#
Say goodbye to that Saturday morning hangover.
David Nutt, an Imperial College professor and former government drugs advisor has reportedly patented 90 types of synthetic alcohol compounds that will usher in a new, and better, hangover-free world. According to Nutt, the substance will imitate the pleasurable effects of alcohol without any of the negative consequences.
“It will be there alongside the scotch and the gin, they’ll dispense the alcosynth into your cocktail and then you’ll have the pleasure without damaging your liver and your heart,” he told The Independent.
He claims that his team also developed a way to “max out” the effects, meaning that you could achieve an ideal level of inebriation without getting too “drunk.”
The active ingredients used by Nutt are currently unknown – and the inventor won’t be giving away his secrets anytime soon. Others have tried creating similar synthetic compounds using benzodiazepine derivatives but Nutt says his product is different.
Introducing a safe and viable hangover-free alcohol would obviously have a huge impact on not only public health but on the economy as well. The Center for Disease Control reported last year that excessive drinking in the U.S. cost the economy $250 billion (although food delivery services and Netflix probably both benefit nicely).
Two of the “alcosynth” compounds are currently being tested extensively. One is described as “tasteless” and the other as slightly bitter.
0 -
STLBADGIRL wrote: »Its arguably debated that alcoholism is just as harmful than other unlawful drugs, if not more, because it is legal. I belong to support groups of both and you can't tell the families there it is a difference. Addiction is addiction. And what makes alcohol abuse so alarming is the fact that it is legal. I'm sure this thread wasn't suppose to turn in this direction, but with posters making fun of me because I used a comparison is beyond crazy to me when I stated my opinion.
And lets be clear, I am not saying an occasional drinker is an alcoholic.
http://www.12keysrehab.com/blog/recovery-from-alcohol-vs-heroin
http://alcoholrehab.com/alcoholism/alcohol-more-dangerous-than-heroin/
No one is making fun of you. Your view has nothing to do with the OP and you are just projecting.1 -
STLBADGIRL wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »STLBADGIRL wrote: »Its arguably debated that alcoholism is just as harmful than other unlawful drugs, if not more, because it is legal. I belong to support groups of both and you can't tell the families there it is a difference. Addiction is addiction. And what makes alcohol abuse so alarming is the fact that it is legal. I'm sure this thread wasn't suppose to turn in this direction, but with posters making fun of me because I used a comparison is beyond crazy to me when I stated my opinion.
And lets be clear, I am not saying an occasional drinker is an alcoholic.
http://www.12keysrehab.com/blog/recovery-from-alcohol-vs-heroin
http://alcoholrehab.com/alcoholism/alcohol-more-dangerous-than-heroin/
The thread isn't about alcoholism. It's about society's views on alcohol consumption.
Got that...and my view is most consume too much and sometimes it crosses over to addiction.
Still projecting.0 -
JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Americans consume far less alcohol annually per capita now than did the generation our Founders. In 240 years, the trend of alcohol consumption in America has declined quite steadily.
Yet you are not acknowledging that 240 years ago, beer (and likely other fermented drinks) were believed, and widely advocated, to be safer/healthier to drink to meet daily water intake requirements than the local water supply by many Americans.
Then again, there's also been times in history where humans believed, and widely circulated, bathing with boiled water to be unhealthy.
We routinely acknowledge we've believed a lot of incorrect things out of ignorance/fear/etc throughout history. And yet, we continue to do so like it's somehow different this time around. The human condition, love it or hate it, at least it's predictable.
1 -
Wetcoaster wrote: »Hangover-free booze could replace the rough stuff by 2050
http://www.theprovince.com/technology/science/hangover+free+booze+could+replace+rough+stuff+2050/12218177/story.html#
Say goodbye to that Saturday morning hangover.
David Nutt, an Imperial College professor and former government drugs advisor has reportedly patented 90 types of synthetic alcohol compounds that will usher in a new, and better, hangover-free world. According to Nutt, the substance will imitate the pleasurable effects of alcohol without any of the negative consequences.
“It will be there alongside the scotch and the gin, they’ll dispense the alcosynth into your cocktail and then you’ll have the pleasure without damaging your liver and your heart,” he told The Independent.
He claims that his team also developed a way to “max out” the effects, meaning that you could achieve an ideal level of inebriation without getting too “drunk.”
The active ingredients used by Nutt are currently unknown – and the inventor won’t be giving away his secrets anytime soon. Others have tried creating similar synthetic compounds using benzodiazepine derivatives but Nutt says his product is different.
Introducing a safe and viable hangover-free alcohol would obviously have a huge impact on not only public health but on the economy as well. The Center for Disease Control reported last year that excessive drinking in the U.S. cost the economy $250 billion (although food delivery services and Netflix probably both benefit nicely).
Two of the “alcosynth” compounds are currently being tested extensively. One is described as “tasteless” and the other as slightly bitter.
What a leap forward for society that will be. Getting drunk without the consequences of a hangover the next day to remind you that maybe you drink too much. <eye rolly>3 -
grinning_chick wrote: »JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Americans consume far less alcohol annually per capita now than did the generation our Founders. In 240 years, the trend of alcohol consumption in America has declined quite steadily.
Yet you are not acknowledging that 240 years ago, beer (and likely other fermented drinks) were believed, and widely advocated, to be safer/healthier to drink to meet daily water intake requirements than the local water supply by many Americans.
Then again, there's also been times in history where humans believed, and widely circulated, bathing with boiled water to be unhealthy.
We routinely acknowledge we've believed a lot of incorrect things out of ignorance/fear/etc throughout history. And yet, we continue to do so like it's somehow different this time around. The human condition, love it or hate it, at least it's predictable.
240 years ago it might have been.1 -
grinning_chick wrote: »JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Americans consume far less alcohol annually per capita now than did the generation our Founders. In 240 years, the trend of alcohol consumption in America has declined quite steadily.
Yet you are not acknowledging that 240 years ago, beer (and likely other fermented drinks) were believed, and widely advocated, to be safer/healthier to drink to meet daily water intake requirements than the local water supply by many Americans.
Then again, there's also been times in history where humans believed, and widely circulated, bathing with boiled water to be unhealthy.
We routinely acknowledge we've believed a lot of incorrect things out of ignorance/fear/etc throughout history. And yet, we continue to do so like it's somehow different this time around. The human condition, love it or hate it, at least it's predictable.
240 years ago throughout the world drinking water was a very bad idea. Drinking unpasteurized milk was an even worse idea (Google 'milksicks') and would probably kill you. Everyone including children drank fermented drinks (ale, mead, wine if you were richer or could grow your own grapes) because that was the safest thing to drink (that's also why people made cheese rather than drinking the milk)1 -
Heartisalonelyhunter wrote: »grinning_chick wrote: »JeromeBarry1 wrote: »Americans consume far less alcohol annually per capita now than did the generation our Founders. In 240 years, the trend of alcohol consumption in America has declined quite steadily.
Yet you are not acknowledging that 240 years ago, beer (and likely other fermented drinks) were believed, and widely advocated, to be safer/healthier to drink to meet daily water intake requirements than the local water supply by many Americans.
Then again, there's also been times in history where humans believed, and widely circulated, bathing with boiled water to be unhealthy.
We routinely acknowledge we've believed a lot of incorrect things out of ignorance/fear/etc throughout history. And yet, we continue to do so like it's somehow different this time around. The human condition, love it or hate it, at least it's predictable.
240 years ago throughout the world drinking water was a very bad idea. Drinking unpasteurized milk was an even worse idea (Google 'milksicks') and would probably kill you. Everyone including children drank fermented drinks (ale, mead, wine if you were richer or could grow your own grapes) because that was the safest thing to drink (that's also why people made cheese rather than drinking the milk)
^^ All of this. The fermentation process was one of the only ways to have a liquid that would store well and you could generally safely drink without giving yourself some form of gastro.
After coming back to read through this thread, I'm surprised that there are still posters insinuating that the reasons that we give as to why we drink are covers for some kind of drinking problem. For some people it might be, but for many of us it's an insult being slapped in the face for enjoying said fermented beverage. I'm going to quote and change part of my earlier comment to re-enforce something:mangrothian wrote: »Personally, I need no justification to drink, and the assumption that people are making excuses / providing justification for drinking alcohol on this thread seems very narrow minded. I drink alcohol in moderation because I enjoy the flavour, the way it complements my food but I can happily and more often than not have food without it, and the enjoyment of having a beer with my hubby when I get home from work on a hot day or a glass of wine on Friday with my co-workers but I also enjoy these occasions without it and enjoy myself just as much; I could also say the same thing about coffee or a cupcake (and alternate them quite frequently). I take no joy in binge drinking or getting beyond tipsy, and I won't drink something I don't like 'just because it's there'.
In some cases, people who consume too much too regularly do cross over to addiction. The majority do not. I'm of the belief that binge drinking and alcoholism in younger will become more frequent as alcohol is demonised more instead of children/young adults being educated to see a healthy relationship with it as they grow up. I'm seeing it happen here now; Australia has a no drinking in public except at designated festivals, and we have lockout laws on our pubs. People rush to the bar at last call, knowing that they need to get their last drinks and consume them before they go out instead of savouring the last one they have, knowing they can finish it on the way home. Instead of the last drink lasting an hour or more, they shove 2 or 3 more in because 'oh noes, lockout!!'. They drink 4 or 5 beverages at home before they go out to a party in a public place because they can't drink anything there, instead of having 1 or 2 if they could actually drink there (I speak from experience as it's what my friends and I used to do in university. Learned from it, and certainly not proud of it).
Unless something drastic happens in society, alcohol is never going to be become a banned substance. Just like smoking, food, and illegal drugs, there will always be abusers. It's human nature. Instead of arguing how horrible it is, we need to look at ways on how to change society's views so alcohol is seen as a 'treat' (I use that term since it's a common one on mfp referring to an occasional/rare consumption, not as a way to put it on a pedestal as a something special).
The issue is, how does one do that with so many societies having different views about alcohol and therefore, different views on how the issue should be solved?1 -
snickerscharlie wrote: »Wetcoaster wrote: »Hangover-free booze could replace the rough stuff by 2050
http://www.theprovince.com/technology/science/hangover+free+booze+could+replace+rough+stuff+2050/12218177/story.html#
Say goodbye to that Saturday morning hangover.
David Nutt, an Imperial College professor and former government drugs advisor has reportedly patented 90 types of synthetic alcohol compounds that will usher in a new, and better, hangover-free world. According to Nutt, the substance will imitate the pleasurable effects of alcohol without any of the negative consequences.
“It will be there alongside the scotch and the gin, they’ll dispense the alcosynth into your cocktail and then you’ll have the pleasure without damaging your liver and your heart,” he told The Independent.
He claims that his team also developed a way to “max out” the effects, meaning that you could achieve an ideal level of inebriation without getting too “drunk.”
The active ingredients used by Nutt are currently unknown – and the inventor won’t be giving away his secrets anytime soon. Others have tried creating similar synthetic compounds using benzodiazepine derivatives but Nutt says his product is different.
Introducing a safe and viable hangover-free alcohol would obviously have a huge impact on not only public health but on the economy as well. The Center for Disease Control reported last year that excessive drinking in the U.S. cost the economy $250 billion (although food delivery services and Netflix probably both benefit nicely).
Two of the “alcosynth” compounds are currently being tested extensively. One is described as “tasteless” and the other as slightly bitter.
What a leap forward for society that will be. Getting drunk without the consequences of a hangover the next day to remind you that maybe you drink too much. <eye rolly>
I hope your eye roll isn't because you are drunk
1 -
I was recently told my a teetotaller (who was very religious and didn't drink because alcohol was the 'work of the devil') that the wine that Jesus drank was not wine, it was grape juice. Because obviously if you're going to grow and harvest grapes you would turn it into juice which would last only a day or two before spoiling, rather than wine that you can keep for years. He and many others actually believe that because to admit that 2000 years ago people drank fermented drinks for safety/preservation reasons would be undermining his ability to preach to booze-loving atheists such as myself. I thought it was hilarious.3
-
Wetcoaster wrote: »snickerscharlie wrote: »Wetcoaster wrote: »Hangover-free booze could replace the rough stuff by 2050
http://www.theprovince.com/technology/science/hangover+free+booze+could+replace+rough+stuff+2050/12218177/story.html#
Say goodbye to that Saturday morning hangover.
David Nutt, an Imperial College professor and former government drugs advisor has reportedly patented 90 types of synthetic alcohol compounds that will usher in a new, and better, hangover-free world. According to Nutt, the substance will imitate the pleasurable effects of alcohol without any of the negative consequences.
“It will be there alongside the scotch and the gin, they’ll dispense the alcosynth into your cocktail and then you’ll have the pleasure without damaging your liver and your heart,” he told The Independent.
He claims that his team also developed a way to “max out” the effects, meaning that you could achieve an ideal level of inebriation without getting too “drunk.”
The active ingredients used by Nutt are currently unknown – and the inventor won’t be giving away his secrets anytime soon. Others have tried creating similar synthetic compounds using benzodiazepine derivatives but Nutt says his product is different.
Introducing a safe and viable hangover-free alcohol would obviously have a huge impact on not only public health but on the economy as well. The Center for Disease Control reported last year that excessive drinking in the U.S. cost the economy $250 billion (although food delivery services and Netflix probably both benefit nicely).
Two of the “alcosynth” compounds are currently being tested extensively. One is described as “tasteless” and the other as slightly bitter.
What a leap forward for society that will be. Getting drunk without the consequences of a hangover the next day to remind you that maybe you drink too much. <eye rolly>
I hope your eye roll isn't because you are drunk
No, but perhaps I should start? Everyone needs a hobby.
0 -
snickerscharlie wrote: »Wetcoaster wrote: »Hangover-free booze could replace the rough stuff by 2050
http://www.theprovince.com/technology/science/hangover+free+booze+could+replace+rough+stuff+2050/12218177/story.html#
Say goodbye to that Saturday morning hangover.
David Nutt, an Imperial College professor and former government drugs advisor has reportedly patented 90 types of synthetic alcohol compounds that will usher in a new, and better, hangover-free world. According to Nutt, the substance will imitate the pleasurable effects of alcohol without any of the negative consequences.
“It will be there alongside the scotch and the gin, they’ll dispense the alcosynth into your cocktail and then you’ll have the pleasure without damaging your liver and your heart,” he told The Independent.
He claims that his team also developed a way to “max out” the effects, meaning that you could achieve an ideal level of inebriation without getting too “drunk.”
The active ingredients used by Nutt are currently unknown – and the inventor won’t be giving away his secrets anytime soon. Others have tried creating similar synthetic compounds using benzodiazepine derivatives but Nutt says his product is different.
Introducing a safe and viable hangover-free alcohol would obviously have a huge impact on not only public health but on the economy as well. The Center for Disease Control reported last year that excessive drinking in the U.S. cost the economy $250 billion (although food delivery services and Netflix probably both benefit nicely).
Two of the “alcosynth” compounds are currently being tested extensively. One is described as “tasteless” and the other as slightly bitter.
What a leap forward for society that will be. Getting drunk without the consequences of a hangover the next day to remind you that maybe you drink too much. <eye rolly>
My nephew in college informed me the big thing to avoid a hangover is consuming Pedialite before bed. I checked and now about 1/3 of the sales of the stuff are to adults for hangover prevention instead of for babies with dehydration issues.1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions