Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Giving up sugar for good
Replies
-
Ooh, I must be a special snowflake, too! But, I obviously look different due to 'no two snowflakes look alike" carp. :laugh:crzycatlady1 wrote: »I really must be a special freak snowflake then because I can eat sugar in moderation no problem. OP-if you feel that you need to eliminate it and actually think that it will be sustainable for you, for the rest of your life, then you got to do what you got to do. But, I've figured out how to continue eating all the foods I like while hitting my health and weight goals. This is what's sustainable for me, for the next 40+ years.
7 -
It's more a disorder rather than an addiction.Sugar, just like anything else, can become addicting to people prone to addiction and compulsive behaviors. It has little (if anything) in my opinion to do with the sugar itself.
I have had issues with eating disorders, substance abuse, compulsive shopping, and over exercising. There are plenty of people who go their whole lives eating what they want, taking medications, shopping, and working out without problems moderating. Those things aren't where the problem was. The problem was with me.
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
3 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »
We're all pretty familiar with Taubes and his articles...
Also, I had a Reece's Peanutbutter Cup yesterday...is that moderation?
I don't eat much in the way of added sugars...I don't think sugar is so much the issue as is over consumption...but the notion that it's a "drug" and moderating intake is futile is asinine. Sugar is nothing new...we've been consuming sugar since the dawn of time.
I am more than capable of having a cookie and going about the rest of my day...or having a Reece's, etc. It's not like I eat a cookie and then proceed to eat all of the cookies.
Sure, I would consider one Reece's PB cup moderation.
I have definitely eaten one cookie and not been able to stop! That's why I don't have Thin Mints or Oreos in the house. I do ok with individually wrapped Ghirardelli squares or mini cups of ice cream. I'm working on being able to moderate a pan of brownies. I can stop at a serving, but am having that serving when it doesn't fit into my calorie budget.
3 -
So really your issue is with OVER CONSUMPTION. But doesn't that go for ANYTHING?cwolfman13 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »It's a good article. It definitely would be helpful if people read it before commenting because he doesn't say "sugar is a drug". It is more along the lines of sugar could possibly be considered a drug because of the way it affects some people. He doesn't say everyone. He does say sugar should be looked at more closely for the effect it has on (some) people.
He writes that it may create problems for some people, health wise, but you won't know it until 20 years down the road when it is a bit late. The health problem is there. He encourages scientists and the government to look into how little sugar is too much.
Granted, I am a fan of his writing - I don't think he won his journalistic awards for writing woo - but I don't think this article is that out there. He questions sugar's nutritional and health value. A fair question in my mind. If people eat it, meaning a lot of it, they should know what sugar can do for or to them beyond giving a few moments of pleasure while ingesting it.
Sugar is some new substance that needs studying and we won't know for another 20 years? That doesn't even make sense...sugar is nothing new.
New? Who said new?
Although the amount of sugar people now consume is is relatively new. It seems to go up each decade.
Acting like we won't know anything for 20 years makes it seem like it's some new substance...we've been consuming sugar since the dawn of time.
In general I think people who eat the SAD eat too much sugar...over consumption is the issue, not sugar itself. I just really don't get the "quit sugar for good stuff"...again, there's a whole middle ground but people seem to want to be extreme in absolutely everything.
The notion that one can't moderate sugar in asinine...we've been moderating sugar for millions of years.
This is also the same kind of crack pot BS that makes people question whether they should have an apple...it's utter stupidity.
Perhaps I didn't type that clearly enough. An individual will not know if his sugar consumption is creating future problems for him until the problem makes itself known - often 20, 30, 40+ years down the line.
Taubes' point with this is that we don't know how little sugar is too much for each person. Erring on the low side, which may be close to no sugar at all, may be the safest bet.
I disagree that we've been moderating sugar for millions of years. Sugar consumption is increasing. A lot. That's not moderating in my mind. That's more of a mindset of there is more sugar so I will eat sugar. IMO.
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
4 -
I've given up sugar (or mostly given it up) not for weight loss purposes but for gout purposes. I've read some scientific articles that say fructose is way bad for gout. I believe it!
gout can be caused by eating certain things not just fructose. my husbands gout flares up if he eats too much pork, an uncle had it and it would flare up if he ate pickled banana peppers. it has to do with uric acid production. if fructose causes it(which it states it can) then you would have to watch fruits and some veggies as well as they are mainly fructose. not to mention certain medical issues,diet,weight,age,etc all are risk factors in gout..if you suffer from gout its best to avoid things that can cause it/flare ups. if you know a certain food causes a flare up you avoid that food.4 -
-
kshama2001 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
We're all pretty familiar with Taubes and his articles...
Also, I had a Reece's Peanutbutter Cup yesterday...is that moderation?
I don't eat much in the way of added sugars...I don't think sugar is so much the issue as is over consumption...but the notion that it's a "drug" and moderating intake is futile is asinine. Sugar is nothing new...we've been consuming sugar since the dawn of time.
I am more than capable of having a cookie and going about the rest of my day...or having a Reece's, etc. It's not like I eat a cookie and then proceed to eat all of the cookies.
Sure, I would consider one Reece's PB cup moderation.
I have definitely eaten one cookie and not been able to stop! That's why I don't have Thin Mints or Oreos in the house. I do ok with individually wrapped Ghirardelli squares or mini cups of ice cream. I'm working on being able to moderate a pan of brownies. I can stop at a serving, but am having that serving when it doesn't fit into my calorie budget.
It took me a long time to learn to moderate cookies, ice cream, etc. It's some hard work, but it was well worth doing. I made 6 carrot muffins a few days ago. I still have three left. I haven't tried this with brownies though.2 -
nutmegoreo wrote: »kshama2001 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
We're all pretty familiar with Taubes and his articles...
Also, I had a Reece's Peanutbutter Cup yesterday...is that moderation?
I don't eat much in the way of added sugars...I don't think sugar is so much the issue as is over consumption...but the notion that it's a "drug" and moderating intake is futile is asinine. Sugar is nothing new...we've been consuming sugar since the dawn of time.
I am more than capable of having a cookie and going about the rest of my day...or having a Reece's, etc. It's not like I eat a cookie and then proceed to eat all of the cookies.
Sure, I would consider one Reece's PB cup moderation.
I have definitely eaten one cookie and not been able to stop! That's why I don't have Thin Mints or Oreos in the house. I do ok with individually wrapped Ghirardelli squares or mini cups of ice cream. I'm working on being able to moderate a pan of brownies. I can stop at a serving, but am having that serving when it doesn't fit into my calorie budget.
It took me a long time to learn to moderate cookies, ice cream, etc. It's some hard work, but it was well worth doing. I made 6 carrot muffins a few days ago. I still have three left. I haven't tried this with brownies though.
I like to make a mug brownie when I'm really craving it. Just mix it up in a mug and pop it in the microwave for a single serving brownie. Boom - no need to worry about moderating leftover brownies or trying to resist licking the leftover batter from the mixing bowl, LOL9 -
If you can't go even 30 days without dying over not getting a doughnut, there's a problem.6
-
Yeah, eliminating it ain't gonna happen. I eat quite low carb (clocking in under 50 g today). According to MFP, 9 g of that was from sugar.
Damn addictive tomatoes.16 -
Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »kshama2001 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
We're all pretty familiar with Taubes and his articles...
Also, I had a Reece's Peanutbutter Cup yesterday...is that moderation?
I don't eat much in the way of added sugars...I don't think sugar is so much the issue as is over consumption...but the notion that it's a "drug" and moderating intake is futile is asinine. Sugar is nothing new...we've been consuming sugar since the dawn of time.
I am more than capable of having a cookie and going about the rest of my day...or having a Reece's, etc. It's not like I eat a cookie and then proceed to eat all of the cookies.
Sure, I would consider one Reece's PB cup moderation.
I have definitely eaten one cookie and not been able to stop! That's why I don't have Thin Mints or Oreos in the house. I do ok with individually wrapped Ghirardelli squares or mini cups of ice cream. I'm working on being able to moderate a pan of brownies. I can stop at a serving, but am having that serving when it doesn't fit into my calorie budget.
It took me a long time to learn to moderate cookies, ice cream, etc. It's some hard work, but it was well worth doing. I made 6 carrot muffins a few days ago. I still have three left. I haven't tried this with brownies though.
I like to make a mug brownie when I'm really craving it. Just mix it up in a mug and pop it in the microwave for a single serving brownie. Boom - no need to worry about moderating leftover brownies or trying to resist licking the leftover batter from the mixing bowl, LOL
I love mug brownies for that! I haven't had one in a while though. Maybe today, but I still have those carrot muffins, and a bunch of Christmas cookies I'm still working my way through, and a chunk of Christmas cake that I have refused to open, because I have trouble moderating that. Right now, I keep telling myself it's moldy. :laugh:0 -
nutmegoreo wrote: »Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »kshama2001 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
We're all pretty familiar with Taubes and his articles...
Also, I had a Reece's Peanutbutter Cup yesterday...is that moderation?
I don't eat much in the way of added sugars...I don't think sugar is so much the issue as is over consumption...but the notion that it's a "drug" and moderating intake is futile is asinine. Sugar is nothing new...we've been consuming sugar since the dawn of time.
I am more than capable of having a cookie and going about the rest of my day...or having a Reece's, etc. It's not like I eat a cookie and then proceed to eat all of the cookies.
Sure, I would consider one Reece's PB cup moderation.
I have definitely eaten one cookie and not been able to stop! That's why I don't have Thin Mints or Oreos in the house. I do ok with individually wrapped Ghirardelli squares or mini cups of ice cream. I'm working on being able to moderate a pan of brownies. I can stop at a serving, but am having that serving when it doesn't fit into my calorie budget.
It took me a long time to learn to moderate cookies, ice cream, etc. It's some hard work, but it was well worth doing. I made 6 carrot muffins a few days ago. I still have three left. I haven't tried this with brownies though.
I like to make a mug brownie when I'm really craving it. Just mix it up in a mug and pop it in the microwave for a single serving brownie. Boom - no need to worry about moderating leftover brownies or trying to resist licking the leftover batter from the mixing bowl, LOL
I love mug brownies for that! I haven't had one in a while though. Maybe today, but I still have those carrot muffins, and a bunch of Christmas cookies I'm still working my way through, and a chunk of Christmas cake that I have refused to open, because I have trouble moderating that. Right now, I keep telling myself it's moldy. :laugh:
We still have some leftover Christmas candy in the freezer that we are slowly making our way through, so I feel your pain
If you do decide to make one, this is my favorite one to make: http://www.food.com/recipe/microwave-chocolate-mug-brownie-349246
The whole thing is ~600 calories, but since it doesn't use egg it's really easy to cut it in half. And it stays gooey in the middle, so it's almost like a lava cake or something.
Now I think I want one too!0 -
Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »kshama2001 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
We're all pretty familiar with Taubes and his articles...
Also, I had a Reece's Peanutbutter Cup yesterday...is that moderation?
I don't eat much in the way of added sugars...I don't think sugar is so much the issue as is over consumption...but the notion that it's a "drug" and moderating intake is futile is asinine. Sugar is nothing new...we've been consuming sugar since the dawn of time.
I am more than capable of having a cookie and going about the rest of my day...or having a Reece's, etc. It's not like I eat a cookie and then proceed to eat all of the cookies.
Sure, I would consider one Reece's PB cup moderation.
I have definitely eaten one cookie and not been able to stop! That's why I don't have Thin Mints or Oreos in the house. I do ok with individually wrapped Ghirardelli squares or mini cups of ice cream. I'm working on being able to moderate a pan of brownies. I can stop at a serving, but am having that serving when it doesn't fit into my calorie budget.
It took me a long time to learn to moderate cookies, ice cream, etc. It's some hard work, but it was well worth doing. I made 6 carrot muffins a few days ago. I still have three left. I haven't tried this with brownies though.
I like to make a mug brownie when I'm really craving it. Just mix it up in a mug and pop it in the microwave for a single serving brownie. Boom - no need to worry about moderating leftover brownies or trying to resist licking the leftover batter from the mixing bowl, LOL
I love mug brownies for that! I haven't had one in a while though. Maybe today, but I still have those carrot muffins, and a bunch of Christmas cookies I'm still working my way through, and a chunk of Christmas cake that I have refused to open, because I have trouble moderating that. Right now, I keep telling myself it's moldy. :laugh:
We still have some leftover Christmas candy in the freezer that we are slowly making our way through, so I feel your pain
If you do decide to make one, this is my favorite one to make: http://www.food.com/recipe/microwave-chocolate-mug-brownie-349246
The whole thing is ~600 calories, but since it doesn't use egg it's really easy to cut it in half. And it stays gooey in the middle, so it's almost like a lava cake or something.
Now I think I want one too!
At 600 calories, that's a splurge. Although it would give me the chance to test the "can I eat half the brownie and leave the other half for tomorrow" concept. I shall bookmark this for another time! Thank you!0 -
French_Peasant wrote: »getoffin1year wrote: »Watch TedEd's three minute video on sugars effect on the brain. Is causes a dopamine release consistently while brocolli doesn't. Sex isn't a drug, but some people sure get addicted to that for the same reasons...
Puppies and kittens aren't a drug, music isn't a drug, laughter isn't a drug...well...it IS said to be medicine, so perhaps we should have Taubes and other puritanical nags, scolds and assorted misanthropes working to quantify its damage potential, regulate it and yank it out of people's lives so nobody gets a dopamine hit from anything, and we all sit around with our joyless lives eating only thin amaranth-and-flaxseed gruel and broccoli. Sounds super healthy!
In the meantime, I'll personally just work on eating common-sense, modest amounts of sugar, like moms have been telling their kids for years, and maybe get a beehive and hide it from the sugar police.
There's nothing wrong with laughing and music or in general the release of dopamine. Its the addiction to a negative behavior that causes that that were discussing.3 -
illyasHodrick wrote: »If you can't go even 30 days without dying over not getting a doughnut, there's a problem.
But according to this thread you die from eating the doughnut. I'm so confused.7 -
getoffin1year wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
We're all pretty familiar with Taubes and his articles...
Also, I had a Reece's Peanutbutter Cup yesterday...is that moderation?
I don't eat much in the way of added sugars...I don't think sugar is so much the issue as is over consumption...but the notion that it's a "drug" and moderating intake is futile is asinine. Sugar is nothing new...we've been consuming sugar since the dawn of time.
I am more than capable of having a cookie and going about the rest of my day...or having a Reece's, etc. It's not like I eat a cookie and then proceed to eat all of the cookies.KetoLady86 wrote: »Sorry - I lost interest when he calls sugar a drug. It's not a drug and it's not addictive. People may LIKE the taste of sugar and thus want to consume more but it's no more addictive than cheese is (which is something I have problems moderating but I'm not addicted to it).
I really wish people would stop listening to this kind of low intellect fear-mongering.
/rant
Define "drug". A psychoactive substance with some addictive characteristics? Yes sugar is a drug, as well as being a nutrient.
Yep!
nope...
Not YOU but for some its very real. The same way people can get addicted to any healthy or unhealthy behavior while others don't. Some people are addicted to working or, others will always dislike it. Some can do cocaine in college and not develop a habit, others have full blown drug addictions after doing the same blow in college. Science is a long way from knowing all the ins and outs about addiction, but that doesn't mean sugar addiction isn't real and should be avoided by those with those behaviors while others like yourself can moderate consumption.
Lol...I love the new year...
I can go to town on a block of chedar cheese and gallon of milk...I have like zero self control around chedar cheese...I don't consider myself "addicted" to sharp cheddar, nor do I equate it to being a drug...lack of self control =/= addiction.
It seems that today's society would rather just blame everything on addictions and other things than actually taking responsibility for what they do...it's pretty lame.
Let me guess...millennial?16 -
YAlyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »kshama2001 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
We're all pretty familiar with Taubes and his articles...
Also, I had a Reece's Peanutbutter Cup yesterday...is that moderation?
I don't eat much in the way of added sugars...I don't think sugar is so much the issue as is over consumption...but the notion that it's a "drug" and moderating intake is futile is asinine. Sugar is nothing new...we've been consuming sugar since the dawn of time.
I am more than capable of having a cookie and going about the rest of my day...or having a Reece's, etc. It's not like I eat a cookie and then proceed to eat all of the cookies.
Sure, I would consider one Reece's PB cup moderation.
I have definitely eaten one cookie and not been able to stop! That's why I don't have Thin Mints or Oreos in the house. I do ok with individually wrapped Ghirardelli squares or mini cups of ice cream. I'm working on being able to moderate a pan of brownies. I can stop at a serving, but am having that serving when it doesn't fit into my calorie budget.
It took me a long time to learn to moderate cookies, ice cream, etc. It's some hard work, but it was well worth doing. I made 6 carrot muffins a few days ago. I still have three left. I haven't tried this with brownies though.
I like to make a mug brownie when I'm really craving it. Just mix it up in a mug and pop it in the microwave for a single serving brownie. Boom - no need to worry about moderating leftover brownies or trying to resist licking the leftover batter from the mixing bowl, LOL
I love mug brownies for that! I haven't had one in a while though. Maybe today, but I still have those carrot muffins, and a bunch of Christmas cookies I'm still working my way through, and a chunk of Christmas cake that I have refused to open, because I have trouble moderating that. Right now, I keep telling myself it's moldy. :laugh:
We still have some leftover Christmas candy in the freezer that we are slowly making our way through, so I feel your pain
If you do decide to make one, this is my favorite one to make: http://www.food.com/recipe/microwave-chocolate-mug-brownie-349246
The whole thing is ~600 calories, but since it doesn't use egg it's really easy to cut it in half. And it stays gooey in the middle, so it's almost like a lava cake or something.
Now I think I want one too!
You just reminded me that I have some leftover Christmas candy in a dresser that I hid from myself. I'll have to distract myself to forget about it again lol.
1 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »crzycatlady1 wrote: »I really must be a special freak snowflake then because I can eat sugar in moderation no problem. OP-if you feel that you need to eliminate it and actually think that it will be sustainable for you, for the rest of your life then you got to do what you got to do. But, I've figured out how to continue eating all the foods I like while hitting my health and weight goals. This is what's sustainable for me, for the next 40+ years.
Or perhaps the ill-effects may be so insidious that you won't notice them until it's too late. I sincerely hope that is not the case, obviously.
Humans have been consuming sugar since the dawn of time...
But not in its current refined state. Similarly (as the article points out) if you chew a bunch of coca leaves you might get a mild effect but nothing like the addictive hit of pure cocaine.1 -
YAlyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »Alyssa_Is_LosingIt wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »kshama2001 wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
We're all pretty familiar with Taubes and his articles...
Also, I had a Reece's Peanutbutter Cup yesterday...is that moderation?
I don't eat much in the way of added sugars...I don't think sugar is so much the issue as is over consumption...but the notion that it's a "drug" and moderating intake is futile is asinine. Sugar is nothing new...we've been consuming sugar since the dawn of time.
I am more than capable of having a cookie and going about the rest of my day...or having a Reece's, etc. It's not like I eat a cookie and then proceed to eat all of the cookies.
Sure, I would consider one Reece's PB cup moderation.
I have definitely eaten one cookie and not been able to stop! That's why I don't have Thin Mints or Oreos in the house. I do ok with individually wrapped Ghirardelli squares or mini cups of ice cream. I'm working on being able to moderate a pan of brownies. I can stop at a serving, but am having that serving when it doesn't fit into my calorie budget.
It took me a long time to learn to moderate cookies, ice cream, etc. It's some hard work, but it was well worth doing. I made 6 carrot muffins a few days ago. I still have three left. I haven't tried this with brownies though.
I like to make a mug brownie when I'm really craving it. Just mix it up in a mug and pop it in the microwave for a single serving brownie. Boom - no need to worry about moderating leftover brownies or trying to resist licking the leftover batter from the mixing bowl, LOL
I love mug brownies for that! I haven't had one in a while though. Maybe today, but I still have those carrot muffins, and a bunch of Christmas cookies I'm still working my way through, and a chunk of Christmas cake that I have refused to open, because I have trouble moderating that. Right now, I keep telling myself it's moldy. :laugh:
We still have some leftover Christmas candy in the freezer that we are slowly making our way through, so I feel your pain
If you do decide to make one, this is my favorite one to make: http://www.food.com/recipe/microwave-chocolate-mug-brownie-349246
The whole thing is ~600 calories, but since it doesn't use egg it's really easy to cut it in half. And it stays gooey in the middle, so it's almost like a lava cake or something.
Now I think I want one too!
You just reminded me that I have some leftover Christmas candy in a dresser that I hid from myself. I'll have to distract myself to forget about it again lol.
Sorry
I will try not to hand out any more naughty cravings in this thread! 1 -
It's more a disorder rather than an addiction.Sugar, just like anything else, can become addicting to people prone to addiction and compulsive behaviors. It has little (if anything) in my opinion to do with the sugar itself.
I have had issues with eating disorders, substance abuse, compulsive shopping, and over exercising. There are plenty of people who go their whole lives eating what they want, taking medications, shopping, and working out without problems moderating. Those things aren't where the problem was. The problem was with me.
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
Some believe addiction, or tendancy towards addiction, is a mental/personality disorder. That's the point. It's the person...not the substance or activity3 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »getoffin1year wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
We're all pretty familiar with Taubes and his articles...
Also, I had a Reece's Peanutbutter Cup yesterday...is that moderation?
I don't eat much in the way of added sugars...I don't think sugar is so much the issue as is over consumption...but the notion that it's a "drug" and moderating intake is futile is asinine. Sugar is nothing new...we've been consuming sugar since the dawn of time.
I am more than capable of having a cookie and going about the rest of my day...or having a Reece's, etc. It's not like I eat a cookie and then proceed to eat all of the cookies.KetoLady86 wrote: »Sorry - I lost interest when he calls sugar a drug. It's not a drug and it's not addictive. People may LIKE the taste of sugar and thus want to consume more but it's no more addictive than cheese is (which is something I have problems moderating but I'm not addicted to it).
I really wish people would stop listening to this kind of low intellect fear-mongering.
/rant
Define "drug". A psychoactive substance with some addictive characteristics? Yes sugar is a drug, as well as being a nutrient.
Yep!
nope...
Not YOU but for some its very real. The same way people can get addicted to any healthy or unhealthy behavior while others don't. Some people are addicted to working or, others will always dislike it. Some can do cocaine in college and not develop a habit, others have full blown drug addictions after doing the same blow in college. Science is a long way from knowing all the ins and outs about addiction, but that doesn't mean sugar addiction isn't real and should be avoided by those with those behaviors while others like yourself can moderate consumption.
Lol...I love the new year...
I can go to town on a block of chedar cheese and gallon of milk...I have like zero self control around chedar cheese...I don't consider myself "addicted" to sharp cheddar, nor do I equate it to being a drug...lack of self control =/= addiction.
It seems that today's society would rather just blame everything on addictions and other things than actually taking responsibility for what they do...it's pretty lame.
Let me guess...millennial?
No, and its a science issue not a social one. I feel like you lack a fundamental understanding of other brains besides maybe your own.4 -
getoffin1year wrote: »cwolfman13 wrote: »
We're all pretty familiar with Taubes and his articles...
Also, I had a Reece's Peanutbutter Cup yesterday...is that moderation?
I don't eat much in the way of added sugars...I don't think sugar is so much the issue as is over consumption...but the notion that it's a "drug" and moderating intake is futile is asinine. Sugar is nothing new...we've been consuming sugar since the dawn of time.
I am more than capable of having a cookie and going about the rest of my day...or having a Reece's, etc. It's not like I eat a cookie and then proceed to eat all of the cookies.KetoLady86 wrote: »Sorry - I lost interest when he calls sugar a drug. It's not a drug and it's not addictive. People may LIKE the taste of sugar and thus want to consume more but it's no more addictive than cheese is (which is something I have problems moderating but I'm not addicted to it).
I really wish people would stop listening to this kind of low intellect fear-mongering.
/rant
Define "drug". A psychoactive substance with some addictive characteristics? Yes sugar is a drug, as well as being a nutrient.
Yep!
nope...
Not YOU but for some its very real. The same way people can get addicted to any healthy or unhealthy behavior while others don't. Some people are addicted to working or, others will always dislike it. Some can do cocaine in college and not develop a habit, others have full blown drug addictions after doing the same blow in college. Science is a long way from knowing all the ins and outs about addiction, but that doesn't mean sugar addiction isn't real and should be avoided by those with those behaviors while others like yourself can moderate consumption.
The science just does not support physical addiction to sugar in humans.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00394-016-1229-6
There is some support for the idea of a behavioral addiction to eating, though the studies I've read suggest that the diagnosis would be rarer than you'd think. Not all problematic behavior reaches the threshold of being an addiction.12 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »crzycatlady1 wrote: »I really must be a special freak snowflake then because I can eat sugar in moderation no problem. OP-if you feel that you need to eliminate it and actually think that it will be sustainable for you, for the rest of your life then you got to do what you got to do. But, I've figured out how to continue eating all the foods I like while hitting my health and weight goals. This is what's sustainable for me, for the next 40+ years.
Or perhaps the ill-effects may be so insidious that you won't notice them until it's too late. I sincerely hope that is not the case, obviously.
Humans have been consuming sugar since the dawn of time...
But not in its current refined state. Similarly (as the article points out) if you chew a bunch of coca leaves you might get a mild effect but nothing like the addictive hit of pure cocaine.
Again, I don't eat much in the way of added sugar...but on a molecular level, what's the difference? There is none...sugar is sugar...refined sugar is just sugar cane (a plant) that has been processed. Your body is going to treat sugar as sugar regardless of source...this is just fear mongering.
I don't eat much in the way of added sugars for the simple fact that I think over consumption is a problem and I eat a primarily whole foods diet...but I'm not going to pretend that the sugar I'm having in my apple this afternoon is different from the sugar I had last night in my Reece's cup (by the by, my apple is about 19g...my
Reece's cup was 8 grams of sugar)...it's just fear mongering.
As "hits" go, my apple was a far greater crack/cocaine hit than the Reece's...3 -
Impossible to totally give up sugar. It occurs naturally in countless foods, and is necessary for our bodies & brains to function. Whether or not you want to eliminate, or severely cut back overly processed foods that contain sugar is a personal choice. For many of us learning moderation of all foods may be a better, more sustainable, long term choice.6
-
ShammersPink wrote: »"the English had the world’s most productive network of sugar-producing colonies – is that they lacked any succulent native fruit, and so had little previous opportunity to accustom themselves to sweet things."
WTAF?
I must be hallucinating all the apples, pears, plums, cherries, blackberries, bilberries, carrots, parsnips etc that grow all over England, and even (heaven forbid) Scotland, not to mention the honey from bees.
Also, we are primates FFS. We have all the apparatus required for digesting sugar. We just shouldn't eat it to the near-exclusion of all else.
Actually most of the fruits you mention as being grown in UK originated elsewhere, primarily from the Mediterranean, and American continents.
1 -
A lot of us don't even need to read the article, all we have to know is that it's Taubes. We've seen the garbage he spews. He's a crackpot fearmongerer with no education in nutrition. Look him up, he studied physics and engineering, and his degree is in journalism. He's not a researcher, he's a snake oil peddler just like Dr. Oz, making his fortunes off writing books about junk pseudoscience.11 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »crzycatlady1 wrote: »I really must be a special freak snowflake then because I can eat sugar in moderation no problem. OP-if you feel that you need to eliminate it and actually think that it will be sustainable for you, for the rest of your life then you got to do what you got to do. But, I've figured out how to continue eating all the foods I like while hitting my health and weight goals. This is what's sustainable for me, for the next 40+ years.
Or perhaps the ill-effects may be so insidious that you won't notice them until it's too late. I sincerely hope that is not the case, obviously.
Humans have been consuming sugar since the dawn of time...
But not in its current refined state. Similarly (as the article points out) if you chew a bunch of coca leaves you might get a mild effect but nothing like the addictive hit of pure cocaine.
So what you're saying is, you have no idea how sugar is produced.9 -
ShammersPink wrote: »"the English had the world’s most productive network of sugar-producing colonies – is that they lacked any succulent native fruit, and so had little previous opportunity to accustom themselves to sweet things."
WTAF?
I must be hallucinating all the apples, pears, plums, cherries, blackberries, bilberries, carrots, parsnips etc that grow all over England, and even (heaven forbid) Scotland, not to mention the honey from bees.
Also, we are primates FFS. We have all the apparatus required for digesting sugar. We just shouldn't eat it to the near-exclusion of all else.
Actually most of the fruits you mention as being grown in UK originated elsewhere, primarily from the Mediterranean, and American continents.
I recently read a history of British food and that author seemed to be under the impression that even before refined sugar was introduced to the English, they had quite a sweet tooth. Dried fruits and honey were common ingredients and many pre-medieval and medieval "savory" dishes were probably much sweeter than today's tastes would enjoy. Apples, currents, damsons (a plum actually native to Great Britain), pears, raspberries, and strawberries all would have been available.
The English certainly took to refined sugar, but it was because they already loved sweet things. Not because it was a completely new taste for them.
(The book was "Taste" by Kate Colquhoun, for anyone who is interested. It was a very interesting read).11 -
[/quote] Humans have been consuming sugar since the dawn of time...[/quote]
Humans have been consuming sugar since the dawn of time, but processed sugar is really relatively new. There is added sugar in so much of what we eat that simply wasn't there two or thee generations ago. You can argue that it has no impact, but to imply that people have been eating sugar in the same quantities and the same manner that they do today is a little misleading.
3 -
cwolfman13 wrote: »Again, I don't eat much in the way of added sugar...but on a molecular level, what's the difference? There is none...sugar is sugar...refined sugar is just sugar cane (a plant) that has been processed. Your body is going to treat sugar as sugar regardless of source...this is just fear mongering.
Addictive drugs are addictive in their 'refined' state but not when consumed in their natural (plant) state. The same theory is now being applied to sugar.
The problem has been exacerbated in recent years with the increased consumption of manufactured snacks, fizzy drinks and hidden sugars in diet/low fat foods and breakfast cereals etc (and cigarettes apparently) that are relatively high in refined sugars.
2
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions