Teacher says Pop Tarts are not a healthy snack

I went to my kids school this morning, to speak with his first grade teacher.
He came home yesterday saying he couldn"t bring his Pop tart for their morning snack, because they can only have "healthy snacks".

I was upset. I still am even after speaking with the teacher this morning.
I teach my child that there are no good or bad foods, unless you have a allergy or ethically cant eat it.

He has been sitting there afraid to pull out his "unhealthy snack" because its not "fruit, or granola bar, or yogurt"(healthy snacks").
I often send those as well.

I told her not to teach my child about foods being good or bad, because I dont subscribe to that.

Teacher: "So you're ok with him having a sugary Pop Tart in the morning"?
Me: Yes, I if send it its good enough for him to have. Just so you know there are granola bars with just as much or more sugar in them as Pop Tarts.
Teacher: blank stare.

Do teachers have the right to teach children sugary snacks are unhealthy?

Are Pop tarts the devil?
«13456719

Replies

  • Sabine_Stroehm
    Sabine_Stroehm Posts: 19,263 Member
    edited January 2017
    cwolfman13 wrote: »
    Pop tarts are disgusting, crumbly cardboard things...but I don't think a teacher can dictate what your kids brings for snacks/lunch, etc...you might want to talk to the principal

    I would also question if the teacher can "dictate". Can she educate to the best of her ability, yes? Can she recommend more nutritious snacks that also have less added sugar? If it's a public school in the U.S., I'm betting she can. But I'd guess that unless it's peanuts, she can't *dictate* what's brought for your kid. For the whole class, maybe.
    And yes, blech.
  • singingflutelady
    singingflutelady Posts: 8,736 Member
    edited January 2017
    I went to my kids school this morning, to speak with his first grade teacher.
    He came home yesterday saying he couldn"t bring his Pop tart for their morning snack, because they can only have "healthy snacks".

    I was upset. I still am even after speaking with the teacher this morning.
    I teach my child that there are no good or bad foods, unless you have a allergy or ethically cant eat it.

    He has been sitting there afraid to pull out his "unhealthy snack" because its not "fruit, or granola bar, or yogurt"(healthy snacks").
    I often send those as well.

    I told her not to teach my child about foods being good or bad, because I dont subscribe to that.

    Teacher: "So you're ok with him having a sugary Pop Tart in the morning"?
    Me: Yes, I if send it its good enough for him to have. Just so you know there are granola bars with just as much or more sugar in them as Pop Tarts.
    Teacher: blank stare.

    Do teachers have the right to teach children sugary snacks are unhealthy?

    Are Pop tarts the devil?

    I hate when people dictate nutrition for a large group. Personally I can not eat most fruit, granola or yogurt without serious consequences because of a medical condition (crohn's) which kids also can have. I guess those on fiber and lactose restriction aren't allowed to eat at school?
  • Domomallow
    Domomallow Posts: 87 Member
    laur357 wrote: »
    Clearly, his teacher is just angry because there's a revolt underway and everyone wants Pop-Tarts. :)

    You can keep sending them as long as you choose the fruit-filled kind. Cherry is totally healthy. S'more flavor is, in fact, the devil.

    I quite enjoy the s'more flavored poptarts... but they are hard to fit into my diet. lol
    Probably because they are the devil. ;)
  • skinnyinnotime
    skinnyinnotime Posts: 4,078 Member
    Schools make up stupid rules which make no sense all the time...at my kids school they can bring a snack of biscuit covered in chocolate, but cannot have a chocolate only bar. There you go.

  • AngryViking1970
    AngryViking1970 Posts: 2,847 Member
    Ooooh, cherry and s'mores are my favorite!
  • singingflutelady
    singingflutelady Posts: 8,736 Member
    everher wrote: »
    I don't think the "only healthy snacks" rule is too unusual. I have heard of similar rules at schools down here.

    I think the teacher could have handled it differently though. This seems like a conversation that should've taken place between the teacher and you not the teacher and your son.

    But what's the definition of "healthy"? As I mentioned for me vegetables and fruit are not healthy at all and there are many people with my disease. There is already enough stigma that a child shouldn't be told not to eat something according to some arbitrary nutrition rule that doesn't take into consideration each person's personal needs.
This discussion has been closed.