Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
What are your unpopular opinions about health / fitness?
Replies
-
I know from my cardo there is somthing to this example running in to mud or long grass adds dragging forces and can effect pace. Ohhh and wet clothing.0
-
I would think outdoor temperature may be a factor also.
I live in the North East of England so almost always cold.
@MeanderingMammal You might like his subject and be able to add some insight?0 -
I know running on the beach is harder too, because of the non-resistance of sand. Mud would be similar.0
-
yeah definitely temperature can be a contributory factor even if it's just emotional reaction. the gym being a temperature controlled consistsntly more pleasant environment and all.... has anyone used one of the newer simulation treadmills?0
-
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »After enough crazy people manage to kill their children. Then maybe the kinesthetic diet Dogma will too.100 years of studies demonstrating this is literally a chikd killer shoul be enouth.
Ok I'm not a keto follower or even a big fan of the diet for anyone who doesn't have a medical reason to restrict carbs - but calling it "literally a child killer" seems to be a reach. Can you clarify? What studies are you referring to? Why are children impacted?2 -
WinoGelato wrote: »01189998819991197253Z wrote: »After enough crazy people manage to kill their children. Then maybe the kinesthetic diet Dogma will too.100 years of studies demonstrating this is literally a chikd killer shoul be enouth.
Ok I'm not a keto follower or even a big fan of the diet for anyone who doesn't have a medical reason to restrict carbs - but calling it "literally a child killer" seems to be a reach. Can you clarify? What studies are you referring to? Why are children impacted?
here is one example :
https://www.thepaleomom.com/adverse-reactions-to-ketogenic-diets-caution-advised/
I so don't want to get sucking bsck into negative back and thoth here. .. im sure sone one will cry BS as that's easy ... but 100 years of experience id there for you. Starting as a originally a treatment for children with epilepsy. So this has killed slot of young children and cause needles suffering.7 -
Here's a bit of history
https://www.news-medical.net/health/History-of-the-Ketogenic-Diet.aspx
Sources at the end2 -
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »01189998819991197253Z wrote: »After enough crazy people manage to kill their children. Then maybe the kinesthetic diet Dogma will too.100 years of studies demonstrating this is literally a chikd killer shoul be enouth.
Ok I'm not a keto follower or even a big fan of the diet for anyone who doesn't have a medical reason to restrict carbs - but calling it "literally a child killer" seems to be a reach. Can you clarify? What studies are you referring to? Why are children impacted?
here is one example :
https://www.thepaleomom.com/adverse-reactions-to-ketogenic-diets-caution-advised/
I so don't want to get sucking bsck into negative back and thoth here. .. im sure sone one will cry BS as that's easy ... but 100 years of experience id there for you. Starting as a originally a treatment for children with epilepsy. So this has killed slot of young children and cause needles suffering.
I'm not a fan of keto either, but seriously? "thepaleomom"? Do you have any real sources?2 -
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10627921/how-to-cut-through-the-new-years-broscience/p101189998819991197253Z wrote: »Here's a bit of history
https://www.news-medical.net/health/History-of-the-Ketogenic-Diet.aspx
Sources at the end
Please read this, it will teach you how to find scientific proof and ignore the click bait sites you keep posting.
Many thanks @diannethegeek for the hard work
3 -
See i know this would happen. ... ehy why be so passive aggressive? Why do i HAVE to obay your rules to have an informed opinion. This "diet" kills. .. end off.9
-
maybe one day someone you care about is adversely affected by this but by then it may be too late hun6
-
where does it say in the community guidelines that all posts have to be backed up by independently verified peer reviewed studies? These are ridiculous and unrealistic expectations fot iterest chat.7
-
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »01189998819991197253Z wrote: »After enough crazy people manage to kill their children. Then maybe the kinesthetic diet Dogma will too.100 years of studies demonstrating this is literally a chikd killer shoul be enouth.
Ok I'm not a keto follower or even a big fan of the diet for anyone who doesn't have a medical reason to restrict carbs - but calling it "literally a child killer" seems to be a reach. Can you clarify? What studies are you referring to? Why are children impacted?
here is one example :
https://www.thepaleomom.com/adverse-reactions-to-ketogenic-diets-caution-advised/
I so don't want to get sucking bsck into negative back and thoth here. .. im sure sone one will cry BS as that's easy ... but 100 years of experience id there for you. Starting as a originally a treatment for children with epilepsy. So this has killed slot of young children and cause needles suffering.
We can't be having any needles suffering, how terrible! We must put a stop to that.8 -
Thank you for braking that up... really thank you i needed that so much0
-
A friend of a friend had a good unpopular opinion about protein shake and the "anabolic window".... we all thought she was nuts. ... she said you had to drink with im 5 minutes of starting your cool down AND any longer would limit effectiveness of the supplementation.0
-
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »where does it say in the community guidelines that all posts have to be backed up by independently verified peer reviewed studies? These are ridiculous and unrealistic expectations fot iterest chat.
This is the debate section... people tend to want sources to know what arguments they're up against and if there is a scientific basis to a claim.
If the sources provided are not convincing on a scientific level, it will be pointed out and the argument disregarded until proper sources are provided.
Also, if someone makes a claim (like keto diets kill children) then it's up to that person to back that claim up. This means learning to wet your sources. The link to diannethegeek's post is a good starting point to learn how to do that.
Edit: I hate autocorrect...7 -
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »01189998819991197253Z wrote: »After enough crazy people manage to kill their children. Then maybe the kinesthetic diet Dogma will too.100 years of studies demonstrating this is literally a chikd killer shoul be enouth.
Ok I'm not a keto follower or even a big fan of the diet for anyone who doesn't have a medical reason to restrict carbs - but calling it "literally a child killer" seems to be a reach. Can you clarify? What studies are you referring to? Why are children impacted?
here is one example :
https://www.thepaleomom.com/adverse-reactions-to-ketogenic-diets-caution-advised/
I so don't want to get sucking bsck into negative back and thoth here. .. im sure sone one will cry BS as that's easy ... but 100 years of experience id there for you. Starting as a originally a treatment for children with epilepsy. So this has killed slot of young children and cause needles suffering.
4 -
ladyreva78 wrote: »01189998819991197253Z wrote: »where does it say in the community guidelines that all posts have to be backed up by independently verified peer reviewed studies? These are ridiculous and unrealistic expectations fot iterest chat.
This is the debate section... people tend to want sources to know what arguments they're up against and if there is a scientific basis to a claim.
If the sources provided are not convincing on a scientific level, it will be pointed out and the argument disregarded until proper sources are provided.
Also, if someone makes a claim (like keto diets kill children) then it's up to that person to back that claim up. This means learning to wet your sources. The link to diannethegeek's post is a good starting point to learn how to do that.
Edit: I hate autocorrect...
Stating source are ike quoting statistics just having thrm didn't automatically validate your points judt like not having them should not automatically mean the point is completely invsiladated... and OMG the title of this thread is "What are your unpopular opinions about health / fitness?" You can't resonable demand sources for this.10 -
dislike all of this passive-aggressive crap .... what's the point?6
-
Im am not your employee and I have no responsibility to you whatsoever. If you want to ibsist on demanding evidence then that's your problem not mine6
-
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »ladyreva78 wrote: »01189998819991197253Z wrote: »where does it say in the community guidelines that all posts have to be backed up by independently verified peer reviewed studies? These are ridiculous and unrealistic expectations fot iterest chat.
This is the debate section... people tend to want sources to know what arguments they're up against and if there is a scientific basis to a claim.
If the sources provided are not convincing on a scientific level, it will be pointed out and the argument disregarded until proper sources are provided.
Also, if someone makes a claim (like keto diets kill children) then it's up to that person to back that claim up. This means learning to wet your sources. The link to diannethegeek's post is a good starting point to learn how to do that.
Edit: I hate autocorrect...
Stating source are ike quoting statistics just having thrm didn't automatically validate your points judt like not having them should not automatically mean the point is completely invsiladated... and OMG the title of this thread is "What are your unpopular opinions about health / fitness?" You can't resonable demand sources for this.
Says can't demand source, yet posts sources like "thepaleomom". SMH, another misinformed mouth breather3 -
You see.... no mater what prople will find any excuse to made augments. were University discussion or if we were all responsible for the care and wellbeing of others .... then you'll be more untitled but we not. Hete over yourselfs5
-
you think you all sound clever but you're coming off as entitled. And its sad.5
-
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »You see.... no mater what prople will find any excuse to made augments. were University discussion or if we were all responsible for the care and wellbeing of others .... then you'll be more untitled but we not. Hete over yourselfs
Translation required. Literally unintelligible6 -
Now your just calling me rude manes "another misinformed mouth breather".... well if it makes you feel better.1
-
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »Mean while. .... there was s guy in my running group who said to anyone who woukd listen that. .. running of a treadmill burnt off more energy then running outside....... interesting. ... thoughts? At first i thought no..... but you could see how it could work.
Not because of outside vs. inside.
I use treadmills to practice hill running (where I live it is flat) or speed intervals, so perhaps if something like that.
I think treadmill on 0 at the same speed is less work (although not such a difference I think it matters).
Treadmills for me are mainly a necessarily evil if I need to do some hills or weather is terrible (as it has been here).0 -
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »you think you all sound clever but you're coming off as entitled. And its sad.
I certainly don't think I'm clever.
I come here to learn more, I read the links and evidence people give me so that I can expand my knowledge.
People are not being passive aggressive. They are debating and trying to educate.6 -
01189998819991197253Z wrote: »Im am not your employee and I have no responsibility to you whatsoever. If you want to ibsist on demanding evidence then that's your problem not mine
I have difficulty following your posts because of the typos, but regardless, one thing that I find helpful when joining a new community is to get a feel for the vibe and the general flow of the dialogue. This community, especially in this section, is heavily focused on science and well vetted sources. Things that are not well vetted, are often flagged as "woo". It is important, with so much misinformation prevalent about diet, nutrition, weight loss, etc that it's not perpetuated on this site.
That said, you're right this thread is unpopular opinions, but you should expect that people will still challenge your opinions and ask for it to be backed up. And again, many of us asking you for better sources about your claims regarding keto and children are not actually keto followers.10 -
sure you all know but wants things devolve to personal attacks its over for your credibility.... passive aggressive language is one thing but if your only reply in an insult well. ... good for you6
-
God's sake I've tried to change the subject twice now time to just let it go....0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions