The Origin and Meaning of "Woo"

1810121314

Replies

  • Posts: 12,871 Member
    NovusDies wrote: »

    Stop violating my personal internet posting space!

    It's because you don't like cats, isn't it? :disappointed:
  • Posts: 8,940 Member
    edited March 2019
    Guys I'm almost at 100. Help a woman out here. This is the perfect thread for it.


    You are lucky I like you. With a woo score that low I should really put you on ignore.
  • Posts: 12,871 Member
    Guys I'm almost at 100. Help a woman out here. This is the perfect thread for it.

    qbf08z363wgs.png

    98!! :smiley:
  • Posts: 15,532 Member
    Guys I'm almost at 100. Help a woman out here. This is the perfect thread for it.

    qbf08z363wgs.png

    You obviously haven't angered the wrong people! :laugh:
  • Posts: 7,887 Member
    NovusDies wrote: »

    Stop violating my personal internet posting space!

    I just hugged you, and as you can see by my avatar, I am actually two cats.
  • Posts: 8,171 Member

    Despite my sass level, I'm remarkably conflict avoidant, and thusly the woos remain low. I need more to increase my street cred.

    I am not sassy at all, I just play nice. Somehow I attracted a woo stalker and have jumped by 40 in the last month

    qug6cq8e9ir8.jpg
  • Posts: 53 Member

    Despite my sass level, I'm remarkably conflict avoidant, and thusly the woos remain low. I need more to increase my street cred.

    Got enough yet?? Can't quite believe how much I'm invested in seeing your screenshot!!
  • Posts: 15,532 Member
    edited March 2019

    Oh, it's not the hugging that makes you creepy.....
    .
  • Posts: 7,122 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »

    You need to work on developing your online alter ego. See, IRL I'm quite the touch-me-not, but around here I'm hugging the *kitten* out of everyone (especially people who claim to hate it :wink: )

    Not sure whether to hug or woo?

    But then woo'ing you could be taken totally wrong by my wife and your husband....
  • Posts: 19,809 Member
    try2again wrote: »

    This poster went on to say she stopped using it in a congratulatory way since reading this thread. :)

    But don't your first 2 sentences make the point that it's rude to use woo for it's stated purpose?

    I use the woo button in the way it's supposed to be used - is that rude or just direct?
    The point I was making is that don't say "BS/too good to be true/WTF" when you mean "well done".

    Personally I don't mind having a discussion with someone I disagree with but there are people on here that it's impossible to have a sensible dialogue with and/or it avoids the ganging up aspect that people disliked before the woo button was instigated - hopefully if people see multiple woos against a post it raises a bit of a warning flag for people to consider, including the person who posted (hopefully!).

    Do wish MFP would spend 5 minutes changing the label on the HTML tag to something unambiguous.







  • Posts: 22,505 Member
    lemurcat2 wrote: »

    In Disqus and various other forums you can see who left positive and negative reactions. I think that would be a better way and stop the woo stalking and passive aggressive nonsense.

    I think it's less a replacement for snark (which I frankly think you are exaggerating) as a lot of "me too" type posts where people said the same thing. I do think it's valuable for that. Back in the old days you'd get 20 responses largely saying the same thing in slightly different ways, and although none of them were really mean or rude at all, and only a few might be a little snarky, the newbie might feel piled on and stupid due to volume (although I'd say thicker skin if one is on the internet isn't actually a bad thing).

    Now the woos replace it, at least if the newbie isn't told she should feel butthurt about getting a woo or two.

    As one of the people who spent their time closing or cleaning out the topics, and then dishing out warnings for the comments, I don't think I'm exaggerating the snark. The fact that so many people were getting warnings for derailing topics was part of the reason why the woo button was potentially a benefit. Some people chimed in with an "I agree" posts, and those were not an issue, but there was a healthy number of people who were letting their own frustrations cloud their perspective about the kinds of posts that exist in health and fitness forums, and the appropriate way to respond to them.
  • Posts: 7,122 Member
    nutmegoreo wrote: »
    .

    Well, I got it down to the building, maybe not the actual floor.......
  • Posts: 3,495 Member
    sijomial wrote: »

    I use the woo button in the way it's supposed to be used - is that rude or just direct?
    The point I was making is that don't say "BS/too good to be true/WTF" when you mean "well done".

    Personally I don't mind having a discussion with someone I disagree with but there are people on here that it's impossible to have a sensible dialogue with and/or it avoids the ganging up aspect that people disliked before the woo button was instigated - hopefully if people see multiple woos against a post it raises a bit of a warning flag for people to consider, including the person who posted (hopefully!).

    Do wish MFP would spend 5 minutes changing the label on the HTML tag to something unambiguous.
    Also sometimes I don't have the time, energy, desire, or patience to explain just why I think whatever someone said was wrong, distasteful, a really bad idea, etc. Other times I realize that doing so would end up repeating what a number of other people have said or I'd rather not pile on to a thread where there are already a bunch of replies disagreeing with a poster for various reasons.
  • Posts: 53 Member

    dfkr1z5uv5k1.png

    Bless all your hearts. :flowerforyou:

    Way to go! Though I've personally never seen a woo-worthy post of yours.
  • Posts: 7,122 Member
    sijomial wrote: »
    hopefully if people see multiple woos against a post it raises a bit of a warning flag for people to consider, including the person who posted (hopefully!).

    I know I don't pay much attention to the buttons. Has to be something pretty out there before I look to see if it got reactions, but I don't think it has the intended effect.

  • Posts: 3,882 Member
    Raysie1 wrote: »

    Way to go! Though I've personally never seen a woo-worthy post of yours.

    I get a lot of one woo posts where it could possibly mean "woo-hoo". Definitely get a few in the NSV thread since I post there I a lot. I think the only one I got more than a couple on was a thread I made about making a cotton candy burrito in Food and Nutrition. I think people didn't like me posting about such a highly palatable food in that forum. xD
  • Posts: 15,532 Member

    Well, I got it down to the building, maybe not the actual floor.......

    :laugh: Yes you did.

    I think I saw you there one day on my lunch break, but wasn't about to say hello.

    8iNmW.gif
  • Posts: 35,883 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »

    Man, I (sort of) miss that! Although after reading @kimny72 thoughtful reply, this is probably better.

    Any context really is everything. If you get a :flowerforyou: from, say, a snarky ill-tempered looking cat, it probably means something different from the :flowerforyou: you get from everyone's favorite granny (although she's way cooler than anyone's granny!)

    Don't make too many assumptions. Context really is everything. Context. Context. ;)

    (And thanks for the nice comment, which I'm taking the liberty of taking personally. :) ).
This discussion has been closed.