The Origin and Meaning of "Woo"

189111314

Replies

  • RelCanonical
    RelCanonical Posts: 3,882 Member
    corrarjo wrote: »
    f0123qnek3wb.png

    I've only been here two months, and they all came from you guys.

    Post history checks out. You avoided the forums for a remarkably long period of time considering you joined in '14 but only just started posting a couple months ago. I admire your resilience.
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,409 Member
    *twinsies*
  • RelCanonical
    RelCanonical Posts: 3,882 Member
    *twinsies*

    @pinuplove is my twin but we can be triplets because more is better.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,162 Member
    sijomial wrote: »
    try2again wrote: »
    sijomial wrote: »
    Kiyomoo wrote: »
    sijomial wrote: »
    Kiyomoo wrote: »
    I use it as "wow", which can be a good wow or a bad wow.

    UserA: I've lost 50 pounds!
    Me: Woo emoji (wow! good job!)

    UserB: I hate animals.
    Me: Woo emoji (wow...)

    @Kiyomoo

    Then you are insulting people by marking their posts as bro science, BS or WTF.

    Please don't be rude when you intend to congratulate!
    How about actually saying something nice instead?

    I think calling it rude is going a little far, considering the sheer amount of people who use it in a positive way. I am not the only one.

    If you struck up a conversation with a stranger and said "You're talking BS" do you think they would think you were being rude? Because that's exactly what you are doing whatever your intentions are.

    "I'm are not the only one doing it wrong" is a poor defense when many people have told you what the button really means.

    You could call my pet a dog despite her having whiskers, chasing mice and going meowww - that other people can't tell the difference between a cat and a dog doesn't mean you should continue to do it wrong.

    This poster went on to say she stopped using it in a congratulatory way since reading this thread. :)

    But don't your first 2 sentences make the point that it's rude to use woo for it's stated purpose?

    I use the woo button in the way it's supposed to be used - is that rude or just direct?
    The point I was making is that don't say "BS/too good to be true/WTF" when you mean "well done".

    Personally I don't mind having a discussion with someone I disagree with but there are people on here that it's impossible to have a sensible dialogue with and/or it avoids the ganging up aspect that people disliked before the woo button was instigated - hopefully if people see multiple woos against a post it raises a bit of a warning flag for people to consider, including the person who posted (hopefully!).

    Do wish MFP would spend 5 minutes changing the label on the HTML tag to something unambiguous.

    It's food for thought to me, I admit, to see >1 woo on one of my posts. There again, context is important.

    And, to your first question, I think it's direct, though I would typically state my objections in more detail (probably absurdly exhaustive, over-caveat-ed detail: Sigh) if no one else had already done so.

    I would certainly say "BS" to someone IRL in a conversation, if that were my best tactic. (For changing their mind, or influencing bystanders, it often isn't, even if it's part of my mental reaction. Online is a little different, but not totally.)
  • pinuplove
    pinuplove Posts: 12,871 Member
    *twinsies*

    @pinuplove is my twin but we can be triplets because more is better.

    Our level of twinsieness is approaching uncomfortable levels :lol: Just don't hug me if we ever meet on the street and we're all good. I'll admire your shoes and you can say I look nothing at all like a cat.
  • TavistockToad
    TavistockToad Posts: 35,719 Member
    Fivepts wrote: »
    just as FYI, if a post get 5 'woo' votes it gets hidden from the thread... oooooooooooooooooh....

    But yours has 8 now and it's still here.

    It was a bug for a while though, which was great!
  • RelCanonical
    RelCanonical Posts: 3,882 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »
    *twinsies*

    @pinuplove is my twin but we can be triplets because more is better.

    Our level of twinsieness is approaching uncomfortable levels :lol: Just don't hug me if we ever meet on the street and we're all good. I'll admire your shoes and you can say I look nothing at all like a cat.

    We shall then nod and walk past each other and never speak of the incident again but continue on our merry MFP ways.
  • qweck3
    qweck3 Posts: 346 Member
    I always thought it was:

    jvqessemmi4q.jpg
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,162 Member
    NovusDies wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    nutmegoreo wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    Machka9 wrote: »
    Whelp, I've been using the woo button as praise. Sorry to all the folks I've unintentionally ticked off. No more buttons for me!

    You can use Like, Insightful, Inspiring, and Hug. :)


    I wish they would change Woo to "Disagree" -- something clearer and not so insulting.

    That would be my preference, but if they don't want to do that, than just get rid of it. As was demonstrated on this thread, there is a lot of confusion about the meaning of "Woo".

    If they got rid of Woo I'd figure out how to passive-aggressively use "hug" as the new woo. "Bless your heart" like how the little old ladies in the southern US use it.

    I've also been know to use "inspiring" when a post in particularly funny and I don't feel like "like" is enough. Or "insightful" for a wonderfully sarcastic post or one that's giving major side-eye. Good stuff.
    :flowerforyou: is the ultimate in MFP passive aggressiveness.

    Hey, don't ruin :flowerforyou: entirely! It can be nice, too. Context is everything.

    And I like woo, even ambiguous woo, having been around when there was no negative reaction available at all.

    Trust me, you do not want to be hearing in actual words from the people who woo innocuous posts, or follow others around just to woo to see their posts. These are not smart, funny, or insightful people. More stupid fight threads frightening new people, then getting censored or closed, is a worse problem that a few ambiguous or unwelcome woos.

    Let the passive aggressives woo to their hearts' content. We're all better off that way.

    Oh gosh. The days of a relatively innocuous first post followed by a page of "that's stupid" and then 19 pages of cat gifs and "in b4 the roll."

    Man, I (sort of) miss that! Although after reading @kimny72 thoughtful reply, this is probably better.

    Any context really is everything. If you get a :flowerforyou: from, say, a snarky ill-tempered looking cat, it probably means something different from the :flowerforyou: you get from everyone's favorite granny (although she's way cooler than anyone's granny!)

    Don't make too many assumptions. Context really is everything. Context. Context. ;)

    (And thanks for the nice comment, which I'm taking the liberty of taking personally. :) ).

    See, I thought she meant the "other" granny on here.

    And my mind is pulling a complete blank as to her username for some reason.

    Since I have a crush on Ann it would be creepy for me to call her "granny."

    Or kinky. Just saying.

    But don't even. Right now, I like you.
  • RelCanonical
    RelCanonical Posts: 3,882 Member
    qweck3 wrote: »
    I always thought it was:

    jvqessemmi4q.jpg

    This is a definition I could get behind.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,162 Member
    edited March 2019
    pinuplove wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    nutmegoreo wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    Machka9 wrote: »
    Whelp, I've been using the woo button as praise. Sorry to all the folks I've unintentionally ticked off. No more buttons for me!

    You can use Like, Insightful, Inspiring, and Hug. :)


    I wish they would change Woo to "Disagree" -- something clearer and not so insulting.

    That would be my preference, but if they don't want to do that, than just get rid of it. As was demonstrated on this thread, there is a lot of confusion about the meaning of "Woo".

    If they got rid of Woo I'd figure out how to passive-aggressively use "hug" as the new woo. "Bless your heart" like how the little old ladies in the southern US use it.

    I've also been know to use "inspiring" when a post in particularly funny and I don't feel like "like" is enough. Or "insightful" for a wonderfully sarcastic post or one that's giving major side-eye. Good stuff.
    :flowerforyou: is the ultimate in MFP passive aggressiveness.

    Hey, don't ruin :flowerforyou: entirely! It can be nice, too. Context is everything.

    And I like woo, even ambiguous woo, having been around when there was no negative reaction available at all.

    Trust me, you do not want to be hearing in actual words from the people who woo innocuous posts, or follow others around just to woo to see their posts. These are not smart, funny, or insightful people. More stupid fight threads frightening new people, then getting censored or closed, is a worse problem that a few ambiguous or unwelcome woos.

    Let the passive aggressives woo to their hearts' content. We're all better off that way.

    Oh gosh. The days of a relatively innocuous first post followed by a page of "that's stupid" and then 19 pages of cat gifs and "in b4 the roll."

    Man, I (sort of) miss that! Although after reading @kimny72 thoughtful reply, this is probably better.

    Any context really is everything. If you get a :flowerforyou: from, say, a snarky ill-tempered looking cat, it probably means something different from the :flowerforyou: you get from everyone's favorite granny (although she's way cooler than anyone's granny!)

    Don't make too many assumptions. Context really is everything. Context. Context. ;)

    (And thanks for the nice comment, which I'm taking the liberty of taking personally. :) ).

    See, I thought she meant the "other" granny on here.

    And my mind is pulling a complete blank as to her username for some reason.

    They say these slips of memory are more common in the elderly :flowerforyou:

    But you know who I mean, don't you? C'mon. Help an old guy out. It's gonna bug me.

    *kitten*

    @middlehaitch That's who I'm thinking of and who I thought you meant for some reason.

    No offense @AnnPT77, it's just who first came to mind with @pinuplove 's comment

    I would love to be mistaken for haitch, but it's not gonna happen. Well, maybe except for you, TW.

    I think haitch has been smart enough to stay the heck off this thread, at least recently? Me, well, not so much . . . .

    :lol:
  • aokoye
    aokoye Posts: 3,495 Member
    corrarjo wrote: »
    f0123qnek3wb.png

    I've only been here two months, and they all came from you guys.

    Wait. It says your join date was 2014.

    Did you just find the forums?

    tumblr_of9a97XO6I1vdlvpao1_400.gif

    Oh I avoided the forms for years. To me, the main function of this website is not the forums. Meanwhile, my main source of social networking, Ravelry...

    I'm typically more surprised when people haven't seen those forums despite being members for years and years, but the forums there are far more robust.
  • Tacklewasher
    Tacklewasher Posts: 7,122 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    nutmegoreo wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    Machka9 wrote: »
    Whelp, I've been using the woo button as praise. Sorry to all the folks I've unintentionally ticked off. No more buttons for me!

    You can use Like, Insightful, Inspiring, and Hug. :)


    I wish they would change Woo to "Disagree" -- something clearer and not so insulting.

    That would be my preference, but if they don't want to do that, than just get rid of it. As was demonstrated on this thread, there is a lot of confusion about the meaning of "Woo".

    If they got rid of Woo I'd figure out how to passive-aggressively use "hug" as the new woo. "Bless your heart" like how the little old ladies in the southern US use it.

    I've also been know to use "inspiring" when a post in particularly funny and I don't feel like "like" is enough. Or "insightful" for a wonderfully sarcastic post or one that's giving major side-eye. Good stuff.
    :flowerforyou: is the ultimate in MFP passive aggressiveness.

    Hey, don't ruin :flowerforyou: entirely! It can be nice, too. Context is everything.

    And I like woo, even ambiguous woo, having been around when there was no negative reaction available at all.

    Trust me, you do not want to be hearing in actual words from the people who woo innocuous posts, or follow others around just to woo to see their posts. These are not smart, funny, or insightful people. More stupid fight threads frightening new people, then getting censored or closed, is a worse problem that a few ambiguous or unwelcome woos.

    Let the passive aggressives woo to their hearts' content. We're all better off that way.

    Oh gosh. The days of a relatively innocuous first post followed by a page of "that's stupid" and then 19 pages of cat gifs and "in b4 the roll."

    Man, I (sort of) miss that! Although after reading @kimny72 thoughtful reply, this is probably better.

    Any context really is everything. If you get a :flowerforyou: from, say, a snarky ill-tempered looking cat, it probably means something different from the :flowerforyou: you get from everyone's favorite granny (although she's way cooler than anyone's granny!)

    Don't make too many assumptions. Context really is everything. Context. Context. ;)

    (And thanks for the nice comment, which I'm taking the liberty of taking personally. :) ).

    See, I thought she meant the "other" granny on here.

    And my mind is pulling a complete blank as to her username for some reason.

    They say these slips of memory are more common in the elderly :flowerforyou:

    But you know who I mean, don't you? C'mon. Help an old guy out. It's gonna bug me.

    *kitten*

    @middlehaitch That's who I'm thinking of and who I thought you meant for some reason.

    No offense @AnnPT77, it's just who first came to mind with @pinuplove 's comment

    Her too :smile: I want to be like both of them when I grow up.

    Yeah, like you'll ever "grow up"....
  • NovusDies
    NovusDies Posts: 8,940 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    nutmegoreo wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    Machka9 wrote: »
    Whelp, I've been using the woo button as praise. Sorry to all the folks I've unintentionally ticked off. No more buttons for me!

    You can use Like, Insightful, Inspiring, and Hug. :)


    I wish they would change Woo to "Disagree" -- something clearer and not so insulting.

    That would be my preference, but if they don't want to do that, than just get rid of it. As was demonstrated on this thread, there is a lot of confusion about the meaning of "Woo".

    If they got rid of Woo I'd figure out how to passive-aggressively use "hug" as the new woo. "Bless your heart" like how the little old ladies in the southern US use it.

    I've also been know to use "inspiring" when a post in particularly funny and I don't feel like "like" is enough. Or "insightful" for a wonderfully sarcastic post or one that's giving major side-eye. Good stuff.
    :flowerforyou: is the ultimate in MFP passive aggressiveness.

    Hey, don't ruin :flowerforyou: entirely! It can be nice, too. Context is everything.

    And I like woo, even ambiguous woo, having been around when there was no negative reaction available at all.

    Trust me, you do not want to be hearing in actual words from the people who woo innocuous posts, or follow others around just to woo to see their posts. These are not smart, funny, or insightful people. More stupid fight threads frightening new people, then getting censored or closed, is a worse problem that a few ambiguous or unwelcome woos.

    Let the passive aggressives woo to their hearts' content. We're all better off that way.

    Oh gosh. The days of a relatively innocuous first post followed by a page of "that's stupid" and then 19 pages of cat gifs and "in b4 the roll."

    Man, I (sort of) miss that! Although after reading @kimny72 thoughtful reply, this is probably better.

    Any context really is everything. If you get a :flowerforyou: from, say, a snarky ill-tempered looking cat, it probably means something different from the :flowerforyou: you get from everyone's favorite granny (although she's way cooler than anyone's granny!)

    Don't make too many assumptions. Context really is everything. Context. Context. ;)

    (And thanks for the nice comment, which I'm taking the liberty of taking personally. :) ).

    See, I thought she meant the "other" granny on here.

    And my mind is pulling a complete blank as to her username for some reason.

    They say these slips of memory are more common in the elderly :flowerforyou:

    But you know who I mean, don't you? C'mon. Help an old guy out. It's gonna bug me.

    *kitten*

    @middlehaitch That's who I'm thinking of and who I thought you meant for some reason.

    No offense @AnnPT77, it's just who first came to mind with @pinuplove 's comment

    Her too :smile: I want to be like both of them when I grow up.

    Yeah, like you'll ever "grow up"....

    It is kind of weird see you post this much without your buddy @quiksylver296 showing up.
  • mbaker566
    mbaker566 Posts: 11,233 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    nutmegoreo wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    Machka9 wrote: »
    Whelp, I've been using the woo button as praise. Sorry to all the folks I've unintentionally ticked off. No more buttons for me!

    You can use Like, Insightful, Inspiring, and Hug. :)


    I wish they would change Woo to "Disagree" -- something clearer and not so insulting.

    That would be my preference, but if they don't want to do that, than just get rid of it. As was demonstrated on this thread, there is a lot of confusion about the meaning of "Woo".

    If they got rid of Woo I'd figure out how to passive-aggressively use "hug" as the new woo. "Bless your heart" like how the little old ladies in the southern US use it.

    I've also been know to use "inspiring" when a post in particularly funny and I don't feel like "like" is enough. Or "insightful" for a wonderfully sarcastic post or one that's giving major side-eye. Good stuff.
    :flowerforyou: is the ultimate in MFP passive aggressiveness.

    Hey, don't ruin :flowerforyou: entirely! It can be nice, too. Context is everything.

    And I like woo, even ambiguous woo, having been around when there was no negative reaction available at all.

    Trust me, you do not want to be hearing in actual words from the people who woo innocuous posts, or follow others around just to woo to see their posts. These are not smart, funny, or insightful people. More stupid fight threads frightening new people, then getting censored or closed, is a worse problem that a few ambiguous or unwelcome woos.

    Let the passive aggressives woo to their hearts' content. We're all better off that way.

    Oh gosh. The days of a relatively innocuous first post followed by a page of "that's stupid" and then 19 pages of cat gifs and "in b4 the roll."

    Man, I (sort of) miss that! Although after reading @kimny72 thoughtful reply, this is probably better.

    Any context really is everything. If you get a :flowerforyou: from, say, a snarky ill-tempered looking cat, it probably means something different from the :flowerforyou: you get from everyone's favorite granny (although she's way cooler than anyone's granny!)

    Don't make too many assumptions. Context really is everything. Context. Context. ;)

    (And thanks for the nice comment, which I'm taking the liberty of taking personally. :) ).

    See, I thought she meant the "other" granny on here.

    And my mind is pulling a complete blank as to her username for some reason.

    They say these slips of memory are more common in the elderly :flowerforyou:

    But you know who I mean, don't you? C'mon. Help an old guy out. It's gonna bug me.

    *kitten*

    @middlehaitch That's who I'm thinking of and who I thought you meant for some reason.

    No offense @AnnPT77, it's just who first came to mind with @pinuplove 's comment

    Her too :smile: I want to be like both of them when I grow up.

    Yeah, like you'll ever "grow up"....

    eeew. grow up?
  • kgeyser
    kgeyser Posts: 22,505 Member
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    kgeyser wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    Machka9 wrote: »
    Whelp, I've been using the woo button as praise. Sorry to all the folks I've unintentionally ticked off. No more buttons for me!

    You can use Like, Insightful, Inspiring, and Hug. :)


    I wish they would change Woo to "Disagree" -- something clearer and not so insulting.

    That would be my preference, but if they don't want to do that, than just get rid of it. As was demonstrated on this thread, there is a lot of confusion about the meaning of "Woo".

    If they got rid of Woo I'd figure out how to passive-aggressively use "hug" as the new woo. "Bless your heart" like how the little old ladies in the southern US use it.

    I've also been know to use "inspiring" when a post in particularly funny and I don't feel like "like" is enough. Or "insightful" for a wonderfully sarcastic post or one that's giving major side-eye. Good stuff.
    :flowerforyou: is the ultimate in MFP passive aggressiveness.

    Hey, don't ruin :flowerforyou: entirely! It can be nice, too. Context is everything.

    And I like woo, even ambiguous woo, having been around when there was no negative reaction available at all.

    Trust me, you do not want to be hearing in actual words from the people who woo innocuous posts, or follow others around just to woo to see their posts. These are not smart, funny, or insightful people. More stupid fight threads frightening new people, then getting censored or closed, is a worse problem that a few ambiguous or unwelcome woos.

    Let the passive aggressives woo to their hearts' content. We're all better off that way.

    I think there would be lot a people who would be surprised and disappointed to see the usernames attached to the woos of innocuous posts or who follow others around to woo their posts.

    The purpose of the woo button was to reduce the ensuing trainwreck of 50 people coming to attack and mock some ridiculous claim, like "drinking a tbsp of ACV at precisely 10:43 pm while covered in dryer lint will cause weight loss and cure cancer."

    A lot of users come here having heard ridiculous diet myths on social media, and it was meant as a non-aggressive response to someone promoting those myths so that others who were able to respond civilly and politely could provide helpful information. That way the information wouldn't get lost in bunch of "hurr durr derp woo" responses from people who are unable to respond in a non-snarky way to people who are trying to learn.

    It's unfortunate that the response has been abused to the point that it is effectively meaningless.

    I have to guess that putting up with a bunch of woo-whining is easier for the very patient and helpful moderator crew than putting out dumpster fires constantly . . . much as I love a good dumpster fire.

    And since (Ann ducks) I know I'm not supposed to comment about moderation, I'll add that I do woo posts from time to time, when that seems like a rational reaction, and especially when others have already made the substantive argument. I appreciate having that option. A post having a boatload of woos and a couple of sound counter-argument replies is a picture that tells a story (once people grasp what woo means). I don't think it's meaningless.

    I don't woo-stalk, though, or woo just because a particular person (with a particular reputation IMO only) said something I disagree with. I probably judge some people's posts more harshly because of past interactions, but truly try not to do that.

    I do think it's funny (funny ha-ha) that the MFP culture likes to woo posts that mention woo. I might sometimes have done that . . . !

    edited: typo

    I agree that in that instance, it would tell a story. However since the button is misused all over the forums as "I don't like this person" or "I don't like that the person said something positive about their experience using (certain exercise, certain woe) to help them reach their goals," people who are new to the forums aren't getting the meaning that people who have been here awhile are trying to steer them away from something that might be "too good to be true."

    You can't share information with someone who might be helped by it if you immediately drive them away. I know some people are perplexed that other users choose groups over the main forums, because groups don't always have a lot of opposing viewpoints to discuss. But when every topic on that subject gets a bunch of woos just because some people don't like it, even completely innocuous posts where the person just mentions the tools they use in weight loss, it's really not all that surprising that people don't want to stick around and engage with people who behave that way.
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    kgeyser wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    kgeyser wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    Machka9 wrote: »
    Whelp, I've been using the woo button as praise. Sorry to all the folks I've unintentionally ticked off. No more buttons for me!

    You can use Like, Insightful, Inspiring, and Hug. :)


    I wish they would change Woo to "Disagree" -- something clearer and not so insulting.

    That would be my preference, but if they don't want to do that, than just get rid of it. As was demonstrated on this thread, there is a lot of confusion about the meaning of "Woo".

    If they got rid of Woo I'd figure out how to passive-aggressively use "hug" as the new woo. "Bless your heart" like how the little old ladies in the southern US use it.

    I've also been know to use "inspiring" when a post in particularly funny and I don't feel like "like" is enough. Or "insightful" for a wonderfully sarcastic post or one that's giving major side-eye. Good stuff.
    :flowerforyou: is the ultimate in MFP passive aggressiveness.

    Hey, don't ruin :flowerforyou: entirely! It can be nice, too. Context is everything.

    And I like woo, even ambiguous woo, having been around when there was no negative reaction available at all.

    Trust me, you do not want to be hearing in actual words from the people who woo innocuous posts, or follow others around just to woo to see their posts. These are not smart, funny, or insightful people. More stupid fight threads frightening new people, then getting censored or closed, is a worse problem that a few ambiguous or unwelcome woos.

    Let the passive aggressives woo to their hearts' content. We're all better off that way.

    I think there would be lot a people who would be surprised and disappointed to see the usernames attached to the woos of innocuous posts or who follow others around to woo their posts.

    The purpose of the woo button was to reduce the ensuing trainwreck of 50 people coming to attack and mock some ridiculous claim, like "drinking a tbsp of ACV at precisely 10:43 pm while covered in dryer lint will cause weight loss and cure cancer."

    A lot of users come here having heard ridiculous diet myths on social media, and it was meant as a non-aggressive response to someone promoting those myths so that others who were able to respond civilly and politely could provide helpful information. That way the information wouldn't get lost in bunch of "hurr durr derp woo" responses from people who are unable to respond in a non-snarky way to people who are trying to learn.

    It's unfortunate that the response has been abused to the point that it is effectively meaningless.

    I have to guess that putting up with a bunch of woo-whining is easier for the very patient and helpful moderator crew than putting out dumpster fires constantly . . . much as I love a good dumpster fire.

    And since (Ann ducks) I know I'm not supposed to comment about moderation, I'll add that I do woo posts from time to time, when that seems like a rational reaction, and especially when others have already made the substantive argument. I appreciate having that option. A post having a boatload of woos and a couple of sound counter-argument replies is a picture that tells a story (once people grasp what woo means). I don't think it's meaningless.

    I don't woo-stalk, though, or woo just because a particular person (with a particular reputation IMO only) said something I disagree with. I probably judge some people's posts more harshly because of past interactions, but truly try not to do that.

    I do think it's funny (funny ha-ha) that the MFP culture likes to woo posts that mention woo. I might sometimes have done that . . . !

    edited: typo

    I agree that in that instance, it would tell a story. However since the button is misused all over the forums as "I don't like this person" or "I don't like that the person said something positive about their experience using (certain exercise, certain woe) to help them reach their goals," people who are new to the forums aren't getting the meaning that people who have been here awhile are trying to steer them away from something that might be "too good to be true."

    You can't share information with someone who might be helped by it if you immediately drive them away. I know some people are perplexed that other users choose groups over the main forums, because groups don't always have a lot of opposing viewpoints to discuss. But when every topic on that subject gets a bunch of woos just because some people don't like it, even completely innocuous posts where the person just mentions the tools they use in weight loss, it's really not all that surprising that people don't want to stick around and engage with people who behave that way.

    I agree with everything you've said in this and your last post, but could we at least have it changed to something more clear, like "Disagree"?

    In every thread or long discussion about Woo, some people post that they didn't realize they were using it incorrectly, and often feel bad.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,162 Member
    Now I'm wondering if woo-stalkers are ever an actual thing, or just imagination by those of us (sometimes me) who feel like a lot of random innocuous posts have been woo-ed in a short time period.

    I almost never try to guess who woo-ed my posts, although sometimes it's tempting to assume. Can't say I care, either.
  • NovusDies
    NovusDies Posts: 8,940 Member
    edited March 2019
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    Now I'm wondering if woo-stalkers are ever an actual thing, or just imagination by those of us (sometimes me) who feel like a lot of random innocuous posts have been woo-ed in a short time period.

    I almost never try to guess who woo-ed my posts, although sometimes it's tempting to assume. Can't say I care, either.

    I have had it happen in other places than just here and one person was quite vocal about down-voting my posts. He wasn't happy when I was laughing over it and talking about setting up camp in his brain for some reason. Go figure.
  • RelCanonical
    RelCanonical Posts: 3,882 Member
    NovusDies wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    Now I'm wondering if woo-stalkers are ever an actual thing, or just imagination by those of us (sometimes me) who feel like a lot of random innocuous posts have been woo-ed in a short time period.

    I almost never try to guess who woo-ed my posts, although sometimes it's tempting to assume. Can't say I care, either.

    I have had it happen in other places than here and one person was quite vocal about down-voting my posts. He wasn't happy when I was laughing over it and talking about setting up camp in his brain for some reason. Go figure.

    Ah yeah, I'm guessing projection. He probably gets really mad when people woo his posts, so he thinks it'll make you mad, and then gets mad when it doesn't.
  • NovusDies
    NovusDies Posts: 8,940 Member
    NovusDies wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    Now I'm wondering if woo-stalkers are ever an actual thing, or just imagination by those of us (sometimes me) who feel like a lot of random innocuous posts have been woo-ed in a short time period.

    I almost never try to guess who woo-ed my posts, although sometimes it's tempting to assume. Can't say I care, either.

    I have had it happen in other places than here and one person was quite vocal about down-voting my posts. He wasn't happy when I was laughing over it and talking about setting up camp in his brain for some reason. Go figure.

    Ah yeah, I'm guessing projection. He probably gets really mad when people woo his posts, so he thinks it'll make you mad, and then gets mad when it doesn't.

    He definitely took himself, posting, and post voting very seriously (it was a sports related message board).