Sorry babe. That's a deal-breaker
Replies
-
tinkerhellraiser wrote: »tinkerhellraiser wrote: »Tankiscool wrote: »LiftingSpirits wrote: »Tankiscool wrote: »tinkerhellraiser wrote: »tinkerhellraiser wrote: »JustPassingTime wrote: »tinkerhellraiser wrote: »
I would love a sugar momma. I work too much (literally live at work). It'd free up more of my time so I can get into the best shape of my life, be a boy-toy for her
Also she doesn't have to hate her kids. Just make sure you set aside enough time for me as well
So it's all about the financial situation. And not the kids
She cannot consistently prioritize her kids above me. That's a no-go for me. But that'll more than likely happen. Soooo..... back to getting a fresh start with someone.
I'm no expert on relationships, but the way I see it - if you start with someone who has no children then it gives the two of you a better opportunity to become close and form a strong bond without vying with a child for attention/commitment.
what if she had dogs she called “fur babies” and felt they were like her children
eta: in this scenario she is middle class
I'll make an exception for you. I always thought you were cute
lol i got real life actual kids and put them before anyone anytime
Omg tinker! You have kids! Are they as adorable as you?? I can only imagine!
No one is as adorable as her! Ok.... her kids probably are
Idk Meeeeegan is pretty adorable too! But they both are!
@DeadliftsAndSprinkles is more adorable because her kids are still twinkles in her eyes rn and mine suck a little more life from me every day
Ok, so I'm a total downer, I realize...but I've always thought that
Children suck the life out of you (and maybe that's ok, and how its 'supposed' to be).
They start by feeding off your body, stealing your resources (nutrition) abusing your physical body with their "incubation" then are born (abuse to you, the host) and suck your resources and time (probably a lot of your thoughts and worries too)...forever?
people u love always suck your time and resources but what else is more worthy
Well put...and good point
Gotta try to remember that, instead of feeling "taken from" and not "added to"2 -
tinkerhellraiser wrote: »tinkerhellraiser wrote: »Tankiscool wrote: »LiftingSpirits wrote: »Tankiscool wrote: »tinkerhellraiser wrote: »tinkerhellraiser wrote: »JustPassingTime wrote: »tinkerhellraiser wrote: »
I would love a sugar momma. I work too much (literally live at work). It'd free up more of my time so I can get into the best shape of my life, be a boy-toy for her
Also she doesn't have to hate her kids. Just make sure you set aside enough time for me as well
So it's all about the financial situation. And not the kids
She cannot consistently prioritize her kids above me. That's a no-go for me. But that'll more than likely happen. Soooo..... back to getting a fresh start with someone.
I'm no expert on relationships, but the way I see it - if you start with someone who has no children then it gives the two of you a better opportunity to become close and form a strong bond without vying with a child for attention/commitment.
what if she had dogs she called “fur babies” and felt they were like her children
eta: in this scenario she is middle class
I'll make an exception for you. I always thought you were cute
lol i got real life actual kids and put them before anyone anytime
Omg tinker! You have kids! Are they as adorable as you?? I can only imagine!
No one is as adorable as her! Ok.... her kids probably are
Idk Meeeeegan is pretty adorable too! But they both are!
@DeadliftsAndSprinkles is more adorable because her kids are still twinkles in her eyes rn and mine suck a little more life from me every day
Ok, so I'm a total downer, I realize...but I've always thought that
Children suck the life out of you (and maybe that's ok, and how its 'supposed' to be).
They start by feeding off your body, stealing your resources (nutrition) abusing your physical body with their "incubation" then are born (abuse to you, the host) and suck your resources and time (probably a lot of your thoughts and worries too)...forever?
people u love always suck your time and resources but what else is more worthy
Well put...and good point
Gotta try to remember that, instead of feeling "taken from" and not "added to"
Go see this man:Nerdswrkout2_1978 wrote: »DC,
I know I can add value to your life, if you give me a chance. That’s all I’m asking for...a chance.
4 -
MrsBradyBunch wrote: »My deal-breaker would be anybody who thinks the kids should be less than the number one priority in any parent's life.
You've got kids, they come first, before any boyfriend or girlfriend. That's just the way it is.
Your perspective is understandable, but I think you've missed the entire point of the ongoing convo. and jumped in with white knight syndrome. The point is it's ok to have kids in mind and prioritise them. It's just not an ideal situation for a potential suitor to the parent of said kids in a romance.5 -
Deal breaker: if he uses the phrase "spill the tea"2
-
1) Sociopaths are out
2) Narcissists are out
3) Politicians are out (usually either 1 or 2 or both)
4) they must love lists4 -
MrsBradyBunch wrote: »My deal-breaker would be anybody who thinks the kids should be less than the number one priority in any parent's life.
You've got kids, they come first, before any boyfriend or girlfriend. That's just the way it is.
Should they come first before a spouse whom is also the parent of the child?
I think so. If Mom and Dad want to go out of town for the weekend, but the kids need glasses, and they can't afford to do both, guess who takes the back burner. Not the kids.0 -
MrsBradyBunch wrote: »MrsBradyBunch wrote: »My deal-breaker would be anybody who thinks the kids should be less than the number one priority in any parent's life.
You've got kids, they come first, before any boyfriend or girlfriend. That's just the way it is.
Should they come first before a spouse whom is also the parent of the child?
I think so. If Mom and Dad want to go out of town for the weekend, but the kids need glasses, and they can't afford to do both, guess who takes the back burner. Not the kids.
I agree with that example of course. I also think there is a line SOMEWHERE. What if Mr. Brady wants to take you out to dinner Friday night, but Marcia and Jan want you to take them to the mall so they can see a movie with their friends? What do you choose?
I'm betting she chooses Marcia and Jan. But only because it's the night Marcia has a swollen nose from getting hit by that football. And because Jan's upset about getting stood up by George Glass and wants to try out that black curly wig.4 -
Laughing pretty hard here.
Mr. Brady and I would drop Marcia and Jan off at the movies while we go out to dinner. Then we'd pick them up afterward, and we'd all go home. Fortunately, Alice has been watching the other kids.2 -
tinkerhellraiser wrote: »Tankiscool wrote: »LiftingSpirits wrote: »Tankiscool wrote: »tinkerhellraiser wrote: »tinkerhellraiser wrote: »JustPassingTime wrote: »tinkerhellraiser wrote: »
I would love a sugar momma. I work too much (literally live at work). It'd free up more of my time so I can get into the best shape of my life, be a boy-toy for her
Also she doesn't have to hate her kids. Just make sure you set aside enough time for me as well
So it's all about the financial situation. And not the kids
She cannot consistently prioritize her kids above me. That's a no-go for me. But that'll more than likely happen. Soooo..... back to getting a fresh start with someone.
I'm no expert on relationships, but the way I see it - if you start with someone who has no children then it gives the two of you a better opportunity to become close and form a strong bond without vying with a child for attention/commitment.
what if she had dogs she called “fur babies” and felt they were like her children
eta: in this scenario she is middle class
I'll make an exception for you. I always thought you were cute
lol i got real life actual kids and put them before anyone anytime
Omg tinker! You have kids! Are they as adorable as you?? I can only imagine!
No one is as adorable as her! Ok.... her kids probably are
Idk Meeeeegan is pretty adorable too! But they both are!
@DeadliftsAndSprinkles is more adorable because her kids are still twinkles in her eyes rn and mine suck a little more life from me every day
Ok, so I'm a total downer, I realize...but I've always thought that
Children suck the life out of you (and maybe that's ok, and how its 'supposed' to be).
They start by feeding off your body, stealing your resources (nutrition) abusing your physical body with their "incubation" then are born (abuse to you, the host) and suck your resources and time (probably a lot of your thoughts and worries too)...forever?
I am not a mother!
I admire those of you that are tho! Very giving humans
As a mother I relate to your viewpoint, but at the same time there have been moments that my children have been my driving force in life. They have helped me become a better person. They changed the way I view life. They gave me a reason to live. A reason to be a better person. They give me purpose.
But yes, it does take a lot to be a parent. Parenting is not for everyone. I respect that. I have had my moments that I have regretted having children. All I am saying is that just like in any relationship, there’s always something to compromise.2 -
Shallow people and people addicted to bread... lol... (just kidding on the bread thing, but it might cause problems lol)1
-
wears leopard print2
-
-
pays the cashier with bra-money or bra-credit cards
sweetie, those people already have an awful job don't make it harder on them please we're trying to have a society here5 -
-
Not me, silly
...my bra isn't big enough to fit a tube of lipstick3 -
Not me, silly
...my bra isn't big enough to fit a tube of lipstick
Well to be fair you’re supposed to lay it flat, not stand it on end5 -
-
2
-
4
-
tinkerhellraiser wrote: »
Pockets are a non-no honey, you don’t want any more material on your hips than absolutely necessary, do you? Have you tried a fanny pack?2 -
tinkerhellraiser wrote: »caco_ethes wrote: »tinkerhellraiser wrote: »
Pockets are a non-no honey, you don’t want any more material on your hips than absolutely necessary, do you? Have you tried a fanny pack?
i have several fanny packs
I can’t wait to wear one in england so i can announce what it is when people ask in horror4 -
-
This content has been removed.
-
RomaineCalm wrote: »
say it aint so0 -
-
RomaineCalm wrote: »
cigs don't bother me really as long as its not an everyday thing so1 -
RomaineCalm wrote: »
cigs don't bother me really as long as its not an everyday thing so
Ok, so I'll just make it a purple leopard print bra like Tink said and not tell you I have money in it.3 -
oh Peg.RomaineCalm wrote: »
2 -
RomaineCalm wrote: »RomaineCalm wrote: »
cigs don't bother me really as long as its not an everyday thing so
Ok, so I'll just make it a purple leopard print bra like Tink said and not tell you I have money in it.
purple is actually worse than leopard print on the scale1
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions