Coronavirus prep
Replies
-
rheddmobile wrote: »I literally had someone on Facebook tell me that I'm the reason that we have to have these restrictions and that I'm selfish and generally terrible for suggesting that I'm not going to let fear of Covid change my Thanksgiving plans. Even when told about my sister he still doubled down insisting that the only acceptable way of celebrating is to not do so. This was a person I know in "real life" and had considered a friend for 2 decades now...the judgment is just mindboggling to me and I don't really understand why in general we can't just practice a little love and tolerance for each other.
I will also add that even just limiting to "immediate" family we are not a small group. My younger sister who lives out of town was supposed to come in (as she'd like to spend as much time as possible with our older sister as possible just in case) but my grandmother who lives with her hasn't been feeling well lately and doesn't want to drive 8 hours here and then 8 hours back on such a tight turn around. Hopefully they will be able to come for Christmas as the timeframe can be a little longer. But even without that group of 5 we are still 10+ people. I've never really understood the thought that 9 people would be ok but 11 would not. We should just ask people to use their best judgment and hope for the best, while keeping in mind that we are never guaranteed tomorrow.
Your friend might be more sympathetic towards your desire to balance enriching your sister’s remaining time with keeping everyone safe from Covid if you didn’t have a lengthy history of publicly minimizing the seriousness of Covid and belittling attempts to protect people from it.
I also strongly disagree that “hoping for the best” is a good approach in this situation, when there are significant safeguards you can put into place to protect yourselves and others who might encounter your family on their travels. We are never guaranteed tomorrow, but that doesn’t mean people shouldn’t look both ways before crossing a busy street.
I sincerely doubt he'd have been more sympathetic as I hadn't (until the specific post he objected to) posted anything about covid on facebook. Or at least not anything that suggested I thought the restrictions are stupid, only how much I hate covid both from a personal and a professional point of view.
I do think that some of the measures that are suggested and being implemented are unreasonable and stupid, but regardless of my opinions on them I follow them - wear a mask when out in public, stay 6 feet away from people, don't gather in large groups (though we have had family gatherings on multiple occasions, including afternoons at the lake to enjoy what time we have as a family), don't go to parties (which has frustrated my teenage daughters especially the one who was quarantined because someone else went to a party and got covid), I'm irritated but understanding of the fact that the band doesn't get to go to state football game (in a stadium that seats over 70k for crying outloud), trying to be understanding of the restriction from our mayor that won't allow my daughters to attend their pricey private school in person for the next 2 months but is allowing sports to continue and all the other restrictions no matter how stupid I think they are.
Most of the safeguards make us feel better but I don't really agree that they work. That is a whole different debate though. And regardless of my personal feelings about covid restrictions I don't think that anyone (and especially not someone I considered a real friend) should be calling anyone else out, calling them names or implying negative things about them on a public forum. They can always scroll by and ignore things they don't like.
Being negative towards someone who does something you don't like is not going to make them suddenly do it your way and instead just causes alot of heard feelings on both sides.6 -
Changing the subject:
The medical director of Moderna reported that just because the vaccine is effective and protects the person from getting sick with the virus, it doesn't mean that the person cannot still shed the virus and transmit it to others. So until we know that it is not happening, we may still need to wear masks and keep social distance, and that will not make many people happy . I suppose that once enough people get vaccinated and we get herd immunity via vaccines, precautions will be lessened.
So far it is known that a vaccine will block infection and viral reproduction in the vaccinated person by activating the immune system before the virus attacks the body; however, there is not proof yet that the vaccine can actually kill the virus and avoid shedding and population infection.
Moderna boss says COVID shot not proven to stop virus spread
https://nypost.com/2020/11/24/moderna-boss-says-covid-shot-not-proven-to-stop-virus-spread/
How a Covid-19 Vaccine Could End Up Helping the Virus Spread
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-11/if-we-re-not-careful-a-vaccine-might-help-covid-19-spread
10 -
From what I read, the vaccine will not be a walk in the park as far as side effects go. Yes it will be much better than catching covid itself, but it's not one of those shots where you can just bounce back to work right away.7
-
rheddmobile wrote: »I literally had someone on Facebook tell me that I'm the reason that we have to have these restrictions and that I'm selfish and generally terrible for suggesting that I'm not going to let fear of Covid change my Thanksgiving plans. Even when told about my sister he still doubled down insisting that the only acceptable way of celebrating is to not do so. This was a person I know in "real life" and had considered a friend for 2 decades now...the judgment is just mindboggling to me and I don't really understand why in general we can't just practice a little love and tolerance for each other.
I will also add that even just limiting to "immediate" family we are not a small group. My younger sister who lives out of town was supposed to come in (as she'd like to spend as much time as possible with our older sister as possible just in case) but my grandmother who lives with her hasn't been feeling well lately and doesn't want to drive 8 hours here and then 8 hours back on such a tight turn around. Hopefully they will be able to come for Christmas as the timeframe can be a little longer. But even without that group of 5 we are still 10+ people. I've never really understood the thought that 9 people would be ok but 11 would not. We should just ask people to use their best judgment and hope for the best, while keeping in mind that we are never guaranteed tomorrow.
Your friend might be more sympathetic towards your desire to balance enriching your sister’s remaining time with keeping everyone safe from Covid if you didn’t have a lengthy history of publicly minimizing the seriousness of Covid and belittling attempts to protect people from it.
I also strongly disagree that “hoping for the best” is a good approach in this situation, when there are significant safeguards you can put into place to protect yourselves and others who might encounter your family on their travels. We are never guaranteed tomorrow, but that doesn’t mean people shouldn’t look both ways before crossing a busy street.
I sincerely doubt he'd have been more sympathetic as I hadn't (until the specific post he objected to) posted anything about covid on facebook. Or at least not anything that suggested I thought the restrictions are stupid, only how much I hate covid both from a personal and a professional point of view.
I do think that some of the measures that are suggested and being implemented are unreasonable and stupid, but regardless of my opinions on them I follow them - wear a mask when out in public, stay 6 feet away from people, don't gather in large groups (though we have had family gatherings on multiple occasions, including afternoons at the lake to enjoy what time we have as a family), don't go to parties (which has frustrated my teenage daughters especially the one who was quarantined because someone else went to a party and got covid), I'm irritated but understanding of the fact that the band doesn't get to go to state football game (in a stadium that seats over 70k for crying outloud), trying to be understanding of the restriction from our mayor that won't allow my daughters to attend their pricey private school in person for the next 2 months but is allowing sports to continue and all the other restrictions no matter how stupid I think they are.
Most of the safeguards make us feel better but I don't really agree that they work. That is a whole different debate though. And regardless of my personal feelings about covid restrictions I don't think that anyone (and especially not someone I considered a real friend) should be calling anyone else out, calling them names or implying negative things about them on a public forum. They can always scroll by and ignore things they don't like.
Being negative towards someone who does something you don't like is not going to make them suddenly do it your way and instead just causes alot of heard feelings on both sides.
We all appreciate you following the guidelines. I think the frustration from those that believe the guidelines do work isn't at individuals like you, it's at the individuals that get angry over doing something for the good of others.
This article that came out in the Summer was staggering. 44% of McDonald's employees (mostly kids) were verbally or physically assaulted for asking customers to put on masks. That's insanity. For someone to be that angry to take it out on a minimum wage kid is disgusting.
There's been so much negative on both sides, but there's been a lot more violence and vitriol coming from the anti-maskers, IMHO.
https://www.businessinsider.com/workers-face-verbal-and-physical-assaults-from-anti-mask-customers-2020-711 -
Chef_Barbell wrote: »From what I read, the vaccine will not be a walk in the park as far as side effects go. Yes it will be much better than catching covid itself, but it's not one of those shots where you can just bounce back to work right away.
well if it is the same as the shingles than I can handle it. If it's better than all good. Those shingles series shots were pretty awful. Most likely everyone will react in their own individual way. I haven't heard a lot of horror stories floated yet from the folks testing it. Have you?
1 -
SummerSkier wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »From what I read, the vaccine will not be a walk in the park as far as side effects go. Yes it will be much better than catching covid itself, but it's not one of those shots where you can just bounce back to work right away.
well if it is the same as the shingles than I can handle it. If it's better than all good. Those shingles series shots were pretty awful. Most likely everyone will react in their own individual way. I haven't heard a lot of horror stories floated yet from the folks testing it. Have you?
I have no source but from hearing on the news from trial participants... the side effects are like having covid full blown for a week. Which I guess is better than covid for months and months, but still that could deter some from taking the vaccine.3 -
If we can't get back to "life as usual" then what is the point of taking the vaccine? A vaccine that can have serious side effects at that. There's going to be a TON of pushback on this if true...I mean that's not what's been being told to us here in the US, until very recently, and there's going to be many who refuse to do so if we can't leave the masks and social distancing behind.2
-
Chef_Barbell wrote: »SummerSkier wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »From what I read, the vaccine will not be a walk in the park as far as side effects go. Yes it will be much better than catching covid itself, but it's not one of those shots where you can just bounce back to work right away.
well if it is the same as the shingles than I can handle it. If it's better than all good. Those shingles series shots were pretty awful. Most likely everyone will react in their own individual way. I haven't heard a lot of horror stories floated yet from the folks testing it. Have you?
I have no source but from hearing on the news from trial participants... the side effects are like having covid full blown for a week. Which I guess is better than covid for months and months, but still that could deter some from taking the vaccine.
Have to see what the Oxford vaccine will do. It's 90% effective and costs $3-$5 a dose. I want to hold out for it (Italy is getting a shipment of the Pfizer vaccine though, since the European Union bought it). Hopefully, it doesn't have awful side effects.5 -
If we can't get back to "life as usual" then what is the point of taking the vaccine? A vaccine that can have serious side effects at that. There's going to be a TON of pushback on this if true...I mean that's not what's been being told to us here in the US, until very recently, and there's going to be many who refuse to do so if we can't leave the masks and social distancing behind.
OMG!! I am not going to even respond or comment to that statement because I would be quarantined by MFP for a very long time. But if you have to ask that question, you really need to learn more about COVID-19. Happy Thanksgiving.
17 -
MikePfirrman wrote: »I literally had someone on Facebook tell me that I'm the reason that we have to have these restrictions and that I'm selfish and generally terrible for suggesting that I'm not going to let fear of Covid change my Thanksgiving plans. Even when told about my sister he still doubled down insisting that the only acceptable way of celebrating is to not do so. This was a person I know in "real life" and had considered a friend for 2 decades now...the judgment is just mindboggling to me and I don't really understand why in general we can't just practice a little love and tolerance for each other.
I will also add that even just limiting to "immediate" family we are not a small group. My younger sister who lives out of town was supposed to come in (as she'd like to spend as much time as possible with our older sister as possible just in case) but my grandmother who lives with her hasn't been feeling well lately and doesn't want to drive 8 hours here and then 8 hours back on such a tight turn around. Hopefully they will be able to come for Christmas as the timeframe can be a little longer. But even without that group of 5 we are still 10+ people. I've never really understood the thought that 9 people would be ok but 11 would not. We should just ask people to use their best judgment and hope for the best, while keeping in mind that we are never guaranteed tomorrow.
That's terrible, the thing you report on Facebook. It's so easy for people to react in a kneejerk way on FB (or the like), in ways they might not in person, and it's hurtful. Every situation is different, and extreme reactions (especially when people don't know the nuances) are not a good reflex.
I don't do FB (I have a profile that hasn't been updated in years and almost never go on), but from what people I know have reported, the judgment comes from all sides and it's generally terrible, not specifically about covid, but covid is not helping. A friend has a close relative who is super anti-mask conspiracy theory and constantly judging others for being (as someone else noted) weak or "sheeple" to the point she sees him differently than she did before and had to mute it. I know many others who report similar stuff.
My own experience with this has been NextDoor, although currently I read it only for coyote and deer sighting posts and photos (I live in a city, and although we've always had coyotes they've taken over the site like crazy lately; the deer pretty much live in cemeteries). Ever since March, however, it's been endless fights and judgy-ness (on both sides) about masks to the extent that it was making me upset and paranoid. (I am pro mask, but I also find it difficult to run in a mask and tend to choose times when few are out and I can easily social distance, and I do actively change direction, cross the street, move into the street as needed, but apparently some have had such bad experiences with runners not doing that that they are inclined to judge all, or to proclaim such things are not sufficient. I still think the anti maskers and those being incredibly irresponsible (as with the huge house parties) are worse -- and yes, now I'm judging too -- but I get the feeling that one is being judged no matter what and that some are enjoying that, even.)
For whatever reason, NextDoor asked me to be a moderator locally. I have no idea why. I'm not particularly cool headed or reasonable at times. I have pleaded with people to be nicer. Not working. They are at each others throats. For every two level headed people, there are two extremes. Sad really.
One lady this morning was calling out a particular clerk at the local Post Office. I'm thinking, do we really need to do that?? Yes, someone at the post office should be wearing a mask, but to call them out on NextDoor by name? And when someone points out that NextDoor is about neighbors and after all the division we are still all neighbors, heaven forbid. Then the thread deteriorates to the extreme. I'm trying to figure out how not to be a moderator any longer.
NextDoor is toxic. A couple of years ago, I signed up to find the owner of a lost dog that wandered into my yard. It worked perfectly and the owner was located in just a couple of hours. I thought wow this is great! I can really keep up with what's going on around here.
Sadly, over time I noticed civility breaking down. It got so bad that I started having not so nice feelings about my neighbors and neighborhood. So I quit the site well over a year ago.
I can only imagine how crazed it's gotten on NextDoor with the election and Covid going on. I don't even want to know. I prefer to think the best of the people around me. I don't need to see their dark sides. Especially now.
IMO, that site is more harmful to communities than it is helpful.3 -
If we can't get back to "life as usual" then what is the point of taking the vaccine? A vaccine that can have serious side effects at that. There's going to be a TON of pushback on this if true...I mean that's not what's been being told to us here in the US, until very recently, and there's going to be many who refuse to do so if we can't leave the masks and social distancing behind.
OMG!! I am not going to even respond or comment to that statement because I would be quarantined by MFP for a very long time. But if you have to ask that question, you really need to learn more about COVID-19. Happy Thanksgiving.
If you feel strongly about the vaccine then great! Take it! But we've been being told that a vaccine is our way back to normal and now the bar is being shifted again. If taking the vaccine means that we can leave the Covid restrictions behind that's awesome, but if not then yes there's going to be an issue with convincing the general public that they should take it - especially if it results in serious side effects.
I know plenty about Covid, my brother had it back in April and I work in the health field. I get Covid can be really bad for some people (though it's totally not a big deal for others, just like most diseases). How exactly do we convince people to take a vaccine that will give them side effects and not result in being able to get back to our "normal" lives? In that case we should just continue on as we have been...or at least that's how many will see it.5 -
If we can't get back to "life as usual" then what is the point of taking the vaccine? A vaccine that can have serious side effects at that. There's going to be a TON of pushback on this if true...I mean that's not what's been being told to us here in the US, until very recently, and there's going to be many who refuse to do so if we can't leave the masks and social distancing behind.
OMG!! I am not going to even respond or comment to that statement because I would be quarantined by MFP for a very long time. But if you have to ask that question, you really need to learn more about COVID-19. Happy Thanksgiving.
If you feel strongly about the vaccine then great! Take it! But we've been being told that a vaccine is our way back to normal and now the bar is being shifted again. If taking the vaccine means that we can leave the Covid restrictions behind that's awesome, but if not then yes there's going to be an issue with convincing the general public that they should take it - especially if it results in serious side effects.
I know plenty about Covid, my brother had it back in April and I work in the health field. I get Covid can be really bad for some people (though it's totally not a big deal for others, just like most diseases). How exactly do we convince people to take a vaccine that will give them side effects and not result in being able to get back to our "normal" lives? In that case we should just continue on as we have been...or at least that's how many will see it.
Yes, that makes sense. Honestly, if the vaccine will make me as sick as Covid would make me, then why get the vaccine?! But if the only complaint against it is that getting the vaccine means we still wear masks and distance until most everyone has had a chamce to get vaccinated, then I am getting it.14 -
rheddmobile wrote: »I literally had someone on Facebook tell me that I'm the reason that we have to have these restrictions and that I'm selfish and generally terrible for suggesting that I'm not going to let fear of Covid change my Thanksgiving plans. Even when told about my sister he still doubled down insisting that the only acceptable way of celebrating is to not do so. This was a person I know in "real life" and had considered a friend for 2 decades now...the judgment is just mindboggling to me and I don't really understand why in general we can't just practice a little love and tolerance for each other.
I will also add that even just limiting to "immediate" family we are not a small group. My younger sister who lives out of town was supposed to come in (as she'd like to spend as much time as possible with our older sister as possible just in case) but my grandmother who lives with her hasn't been feeling well lately and doesn't want to drive 8 hours here and then 8 hours back on such a tight turn around. Hopefully they will be able to come for Christmas as the timeframe can be a little longer. But even without that group of 5 we are still 10+ people. I've never really understood the thought that 9 people would be ok but 11 would not. We should just ask people to use their best judgment and hope for the best, while keeping in mind that we are never guaranteed tomorrow.
Your friend might be more sympathetic towards your desire to balance enriching your sister’s remaining time with keeping everyone safe from Covid if you didn’t have a lengthy history of publicly minimizing the seriousness of Covid and belittling attempts to protect people from it.
I also strongly disagree that “hoping for the best” is a good approach in this situation, when there are significant safeguards you can put into place to protect yourselves and others who might encounter your family on their travels. We are never guaranteed tomorrow, but that doesn’t mean people shouldn’t look both ways before crossing a busy street.
Going back to the comment about the Facebook conversation (and taking the report as literal/face value), it seems like people could be making somewhat more nuanced responses, rather than leading with (in effect) "you're irresponsible and doing it wrong".
Maybe it's just me (and that's fine), but in PP's scenario with a relatively late-stage relative . . . well, that's relevant, IMO. I'm wondering if things could've played out differently if the person who told her on FB that she was making a bad call had said something more like "that would really feel risky to me, so I'm wondering what your thought process is" vs. just insisting on isolated holidays as an absolute. I really think people behave differently on social media, relying on their assumptions/interpretations and responding on the assumption that those are TrueTrueTRUE, when in person things tend to be a little softer.
3 -
If we can't get back to "life as usual" then what is the point of taking the vaccine? A vaccine that can have serious side effects at that. There's going to be a TON of pushback on this if true...I mean that's not what's been being told to us here in the US, until very recently, and there's going to be many who refuse to do so if we can't leave the masks and social distancing behind.
OMG!! I am not going to even respond or comment to that statement because I would be quarantined by MFP for a very long time. But if you have to ask that question, you really need to learn more about COVID-19. Happy Thanksgiving.
If you feel strongly about the vaccine then great! Take it! But we've been being told that a vaccine is our way back to normal and now the bar is being shifted again. If taking the vaccine means that we can leave the Covid restrictions behind that's awesome, but if not then yes there's going to be an issue with convincing the general public that they should take it - especially if it results in serious side effects.
I know plenty about Covid, my brother had it back in April and I work in the health field. I get Covid can be really bad for some people (though it's totally not a big deal for others, just like most diseases). How exactly do we convince people to take a vaccine that will give them side effects and not result in being able to get back to our "normal" lives? In that case we should just continue on as we have been...or at least that's how many will see it.
May just may be me, but the question in my mind is "does the vaccine materially improve the situation, at a reasonable cost/risk"? Holding it to a standard that says "it's not worth it if it doesn't return us to 'normal'" (whatever the heck 'normal' is) seems very black and white, and extreme.18 -
If we can't get back to "life as usual" then what is the point of taking the vaccine? A vaccine that can have serious side effects at that. There's going to be a TON of pushback on this if true...I mean that's not what's been being told to us here in the US, until very recently, and there's going to be many who refuse to do so if we can't leave the masks and social distancing behind.
OMG!! I am not going to even respond or comment to that statement because I would be quarantined by MFP for a very long time. But if you have to ask that question, you really need to learn more about COVID-19. Happy Thanksgiving.
If you feel strongly about the vaccine then great! Take it! But we've been being told that a vaccine is our way back to normal and now the bar is being shifted again. If taking the vaccine means that we can leave the Covid restrictions behind that's awesome, but if not then yes there's going to be an issue with convincing the general public that they should take it - especially if it results in serious side effects.
I know plenty about Covid, my brother had it back in April and I work in the health field. I get Covid can be really bad for some people (though it's totally not a big deal for others, just like most diseases). How exactly do we convince people to take a vaccine that will give them side effects and not result in being able to get back to our "normal" lives? In that case we should just continue on as we have been...or at least that's how many will see it.
May just may be me, but the question in my mind is "how/does the vaccine materially improve the situation, at a reasonable cost/risk"? Holding it to a standard that says "it's not worth it if it doesn't return us to 'normal'" (whatever the heck 'normal' is) seems very black and white, and extreme.
That's a reasonable way to see it, but I guess the question is...how does it materially improve the situation? If I take it, get side effects and then still have to socially distance and wear a mask I don't see an improvement. Maybe there is some that I'm not seeing as of yet, but let's face it - in general here in the US this has become a really hot topic and people on both sides of the restrictions are pretty entrenched on what they think. And with the new info coming out about a vaccine that we are supposed to get that doesn't deliver what we were promised (a return to normalcy) and tempers are sure to flare on both sides.4 -
If we can't get back to "life as usual" then what is the point of taking the vaccine? A vaccine that can have serious side effects at that. There's going to be a TON of pushback on this if true...I mean that's not what's been being told to us here in the US, until very recently, and there's going to be many who refuse to do so if we can't leave the masks and social distancing behind.
OMG!! I am not going to even respond or comment to that statement because I would be quarantined by MFP for a very long time. But if you have to ask that question, you really need to learn more about COVID-19. Happy Thanksgiving.
If you feel strongly about the vaccine then great! Take it! But we've been being told that a vaccine is our way back to normal and now the bar is being shifted again. If taking the vaccine means that we can leave the Covid restrictions behind that's awesome, but if not then yes there's going to be an issue with convincing the general public that they should take it - especially if it results in serious side effects.
I know plenty about Covid, my brother had it back in April and I work in the health field. I get Covid can be really bad for some people (though it's totally not a big deal for others, just like most diseases). How exactly do we convince people to take a vaccine that will give them side effects and not result in being able to get back to our "normal" lives? In that case we should just continue on as we have been...or at least that's how many will see it.
May just may be me, but the question in my mind is "how/does the vaccine materially improve the situation, at a reasonable cost/risk"? Holding it to a standard that says "it's not worth it if it doesn't return us to 'normal'" (whatever the heck 'normal' is) seems very black and white, and extreme.
That's a reasonable way to see it, but I guess the question is...how does it materially improve the situation? If I take it, get side effects and then still have to socially distance and wear a mask I don't see an improvement. Maybe there is some that I'm not seeing as of yet, but let's face it - in general here in the US this has become a really hot topic and people on both sides of the restrictions are pretty entrenched on what they think. And with the new info coming out about a vaccine that we are supposed to get that doesn't deliver what we were promised (a return to normalcy) and tempers are sure to flare on both sides.
If everybody who takes a vaccine gets as sick as a mild Covid case (which I don't think will be the outcome), but it leads to virtually no one (who's been vaccinated) getting deadly cases, or cases with long-term dire physical consequences . . . that's good enough for me. Others may judge differently, but that's my view. I'm pretty old, and I've been mildly/moderately sick a whole bunch of times, sometimes intentionally (i.e, chemotherapy). I can do it again. Will, in fact, if that's how the tradeoff looks.23 -
All this talk about side effects. This thread is the first source I have seen talking about any side effects. Can anyone point me to anything official that discusses this?5
-
T1DCarnivoreRunner wrote: »If we can't get back to "life as usual" then what is the point of taking the vaccine? A vaccine that can have serious side effects at that. There's going to be a TON of pushback on this if true...I mean that's not what's been being told to us here in the US, until very recently, and there's going to be many who refuse to do so if we can't leave the masks and social distancing behind.
OMG!! I am not going to even respond or comment to that statement because I would be quarantined by MFP for a very long time. But if you have to ask that question, you really need to learn more about COVID-19. Happy Thanksgiving.
If you feel strongly about the vaccine then great! Take it! But we've been being told that a vaccine is our way back to normal and now the bar is being shifted again. If taking the vaccine means that we can leave the Covid restrictions behind that's awesome, but if not then yes there's going to be an issue with convincing the general public that they should take it - especially if it results in serious side effects.
I know plenty about Covid, my brother had it back in April and I work in the health field. I get Covid can be really bad for some people (though it's totally not a big deal for others, just like most diseases). How exactly do we convince people to take a vaccine that will give them side effects and not result in being able to get back to our "normal" lives? In that case we should just continue on as we have been...or at least that's how many will see it.
Yes, that makes sense. Honestly, if the vaccine will make me as sick as Covid would make me, then why get the vaccine?! But if the only complaint against it is that getting the vaccine means we still wear masks and distance until most everyone has had a chamce to get vaccinated, then I am getting it.
The thing about serious side effects of vaccines, such as Epstein-Barre, is that mostly, with the vaccines I’m familiar with, if you get a reaction to the vaccine you would have gotten an even worse reaction to the illness. For example if you have a serious autoimmune reaction to a flu vaccine, it’s because your body in particular confuses some part of itself for the flu. That would happen to that individual however they were exposed to the flu.
The Covid vaccines are a new type of vaccine and I’m not familiar enough with the science to say whether this is true of them.
I don’t want to EVER get Covid. At this point they are saying 80% of people lose smell and taste, and a significant number never get it back. Apart from the whole, you know, dying thing, I like food and perfume and being able to tell when there’s a dead squirrel in my air vent. Scent is strongly associated with memory and the loss of it is strongly associated with depression. If a vaccine can prevent me from losing two out of the traditional five senses, maybe permanently, I would like that please.20 -
Chef_Barbell wrote: »SummerSkier wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »From what I read, the vaccine will not be a walk in the park as far as side effects go. Yes it will be much better than catching covid itself, but it's not one of those shots where you can just bounce back to work right away.
well if it is the same as the shingles than I can handle it. If it's better than all good. Those shingles series shots were pretty awful. Most likely everyone will react in their own individual way. I haven't heard a lot of horror stories floated yet from the folks testing it. Have you?
I have no source but from hearing on the news from trial participants... the side effects are like having covid full blown for a week. Which I guess is better than covid for months and months, but still that could deter some from taking the vaccine.
With respect it’s not much like having full blown Covid at all. Sometimes a high fever, aches, etc. but no one is on a ventilator in the hospital as a result of the vaccine.14 -
All this talk about side effects. This thread is the first source I have seen talking about any side effects. Can anyone point me to anything official that discusses this?
https://abc11.com/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-for-update/8225935/ (thanks, Google)
Basically, there's some exaggeration in some statements made re side effects in this thread. The vast majority of people aren't going to be sick for a week.16 -
All this talk about side effects. This thread is the first source I have seen talking about any side effects. Can anyone point me to anything official that discusses this?
Considering the vaccine trials are blind, there is little publicly available data, as no one knows which participants got the vaccine. My understanding is that some people are reporting a day or two of fatigue and fever. I haven't heard anything about people being sick for a week personally.
**
Life will not return to "normal" immediately, it wouldn't surprise me if masks and public distancing is a thing through 2021 at least. It will be a mammoth task to get enough people vaccinated to limit spread enough to protect the people who can't get vaccinated. If I'm remembering the story correctly, it took about a decade for the polio vaccine program to work to the point that parents didn't need to worry about their children dying from it. Unfortunately we are now used to not having to wait to get anything, and most of us can't imagine what life without the safety of modern healthcare was like just 100 years ago.20 -
All this talk about side effects. This thread is the first source I have seen talking about any side effects. Can anyone point me to anything official that discusses this?
I haven't made any serious research of it, but what I've heard casually so far is that this could be one of those vaccines where you get some flu-ish effects after.
I'm assuming that's possibly similar (in feelings & origin) to my "flu like" post chemotherapy side effects, i.e., the part where your immune system is getting kind of excited, maybe creating some inflammation, so things like mild body aches, little headache, temporary fatigue, maybe sniffles or mild nausea, could be slightly elevated body temp. Some people get symptoms like this from other vaccinations for flu, shingles, etc. A very few people get worse ones, some people have none at all. Some people overdramatize them (I know one mom who stopped vaccinating her child because he felt a little bit of this kind of thing after some childhood vaccination, and I'm not talking about an extreme/outlier set of side effects - just mild.)
(For clarity: With chemo, it's not a rev of the immune system, it's more like a rebuild. IMU, similar side effect profile, though.)
There are a bunch of news articles with quotes from CDC outlining this stuff. This is a random one, from a search:
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/23/covid-vaccine-cdc-should-warn-people-the-side-effects-from-shots-wont-be-walk-in-the-park-.html
CDC's got a bunch of info online about similar side effect profile from other vaccines, but I didn't quickly find an equivalent article there for these new ones (not surprising, to me).10 -
All this talk about side effects. This thread is the first source I have seen talking about any side effects. Can anyone point me to anything official that discusses this?
The Covid-19 vaccine might make you feel lousy (but that’s OK!) (resultsarein@newsletters.cnn.com)
Americans need to be prepared for the possibility that they may feel a little unwell after they get a coronavirus vaccine, if one is authorized, members of a US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advisory committee said Monday.
The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices met to discuss whether to recommend use of any Covid-19 vaccine that the US Food and Drug Administration might authorize.
Volunteers in vaccine trials have reported they frequently feel flu-like effects after getting vaccinated, and members of the ACIP -- as well as liaison representatives who take part in the discussion -- said that could affect people's willingness to get vaccinated in the first place, or to get the second dose of the two-vaccine regimen.
"As a practicing physician, I have got to be sure my patients will come back for the second dose. We really have got to make patients aware that this is not going to be a walk in the park," Dr. Sandra Fryhofer of the Emory University School of Medicine, representing the American Medical Association, told the meeting. "They are going to know they got a vaccine. They are not going to feel wonderful."
Remember: The whole point of vaccination is to cause an immune response in the body and that can sometimes cause flu-like symptoms such as body aches, a fever or a headache.
11 -
Wow! you guys are great and fast. After writing my post here, I tried doing my own search (maybe should have done before my post...hmmmm), and then my internet got stuck. Not sure why. Anyhow, I get back and you all have already got me lots of stuff to check out. Thanks!7
-
If we can't get back to "life as usual" then what is the point of taking the vaccine? A vaccine that can have serious side effects at that. There's going to be a TON of pushback on this if true...I mean that's not what's been being told to us here in the US, until very recently, and there's going to be many who refuse to do so if we can't leave the masks and social distancing behind.
OMG!! I am not going to even respond or comment to that statement because I would be quarantined by MFP for a very long time. But if you have to ask that question, you really need to learn more about COVID-19. Happy Thanksgiving.
If you feel strongly about the vaccine then great! Take it! But we've been being told that a vaccine is our way back to normal and now the bar is being shifted again. If taking the vaccine means that we can leave the Covid restrictions behind that's awesome, but if not then yes there's going to be an issue with convincing the general public that they should take it - especially if it results in serious side effects.
I know plenty about Covid, my brother had it back in April and I work in the health field. I get Covid can be really bad for some people (though it's totally not a big deal for others, just like most diseases). How exactly do we convince people to take a vaccine that will give them side effects and not result in being able to get back to our "normal" lives? In that case we should just continue on as we have been...or at least that's how many will see it.
May just may be me, but the question in my mind is "how/does the vaccine materially improve the situation, at a reasonable cost/risk"? Holding it to a standard that says "it's not worth it if it doesn't return us to 'normal'" (whatever the heck 'normal' is) seems very black and white, and extreme.
That's a reasonable way to see it, but I guess the question is...how does it materially improve the situation? If I take it, get side effects and then still have to socially distance and wear a mask I don't see an improvement. Maybe there is some that I'm not seeing as of yet, but let's face it - in general here in the US this has become a really hot topic and people on both sides of the restrictions are pretty entrenched on what they think. And with the new info coming out about a vaccine that we are supposed to get that doesn't deliver what we were promised (a return to normalcy) and tempers are sure to flare on both sides.
The vaccine promised to provide immunity against COVID-19 virus, and it has been reported that all of them have so far reached about 90% efficacy. What we are talking now is about the ability of the vaccine to kill the virus so a vaccinated person doesn't shed it and maybe infect another person. I don't recall nobody ever promising that, but probably the regular population assumed that the vaccine was going to do it. If you find an article where medical authorities promised that the vaccine was going to kill the virus, please let us know.
However, if everybody gets vaccinated, and even if some people still shed the virus, nobody would get infected. It is called herd immunity due to vaccination. I am still waiting to read direct information from the FDA, the CDC and the pharmaceutical companies for clarification.
But we all need to realized that our "before-COVID normal" has changed and to get to the "new after-COVID normal" will not be easy or an immediate response. Just don't throw your masks and promote vaccination.14 -
Back to shopping, I've had no issues getting paper products, but 2 stores in a row failed to have butternut squash. These were both delivery, so I wondered if the shopper just didn't find it, but perhaps there is a Thanksgiving-related run on it. I got kabocha as a substitute from the second place, so that's just as good for my purposes anyway.4
-
Update on Covid restrictions from New South Wales
A number of eased restrictions have been given the green light by the state government, including loosening regulations around how many people can visit your home for Christmas.
Up to 50 people will be allowed to congregate at private gatherings, just in time for the festive season, but there’s a catch.
It is recommended people only have 30 guests if they don’t have an outdoor space, with bigger crowds only allowed for those who have a backyard.
After months of working from home, NSW workers will be encouraged to return to the office after December 14 so long as their employer has a COVIDSafe plan in place.
Pubs and restaurants will be allowed one person per two square metres without a cap – if the venue is between 100 and 200 square metres.
However rules will remain the same for larger venues, with NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian saying they’re “not quite there yet”.
“Health is looking very closely at being able to apply that to square-metre rule indoors across all hospitality venues but we’re not quite there yet,” she said.
Other changes include boosting the number of people allowed to gather outdoors.
“That was previously 30, that is also 50, we are trying to maintain consistency as far as possible across the board,” she said on Wednesday.
Im a bit worried about the return to work on the 14th, thousands hitting public transport 🤞 hope it goes well.
11 -
If we can't get back to "life as usual" then what is the point of taking the vaccine? A vaccine that can have serious side effects at that. There's going to be a TON of pushback on this if true...I mean that's not what's been being told to us here in the US, until very recently, and there's going to be many who refuse to do so if we can't leave the masks and social distancing behind.
The "point" would be that an effective vaccine would result in fewer people dying, which seems like a great outcome even if we do have to wear a mask in some situations.16 -
rheddmobile wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »SummerSkier wrote: »Chef_Barbell wrote: »From what I read, the vaccine will not be a walk in the park as far as side effects go. Yes it will be much better than catching covid itself, but it's not one of those shots where you can just bounce back to work right away.
well if it is the same as the shingles than I can handle it. If it's better than all good. Those shingles series shots were pretty awful. Most likely everyone will react in their own individual way. I haven't heard a lot of horror stories floated yet from the folks testing it. Have you?
I have no source but from hearing on the news from trial participants... the side effects are like having covid full blown for a week. Which I guess is better than covid for months and months, but still that could deter some from taking the vaccine.
With respect it’s not much like having full blown Covid at all. Sometimes a high fever, aches, etc. but no one is on a ventilator in the hospital as a result of the vaccine.
I am someone who tends to respond poorly to the flu vaccine (pain at injection site, aches, sometimes a mild fever). It's not pleasant and I do plan my annual vaccine around the assumption that I won't feel good the next day since I usually don't. It's still way better than getting actual influenza and way, way better than giving others the flu. On the assumption that the Covid vaccine would have a similar impact on me, this still seems like an easy decision.14 -
I see the pharmaceutical ads on tv with all the possible side affect warnings. This for drugs that went through years of scrutiny before being approved by the FDA. I’m skeptical of the safety and long term possible side affects that may, or may not occur from the vaccines. Both my husband and I are over 65. Husband is still working in an essential job. He’s a cancer survivor. So at risk group for both of us. I realize that general distribution of the vaccine is down the road, in the best of circumstances, for us. Maybe by the time we qualify for the vaccine, more will be known. Meanwhile, mask wearing, social distancing, and hand washing has worked, and will hopefully continue to do so. Exposure for me very minimal, limiting to mainly grocery store and Target. My husband has had a few cases at his place of employment, with no contact with the people that have contracted Covid-19.8
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions