Gif of me balancing a barbell while squatting no hands!
Replies
-
This content has been removed.
-
Clearly the important part is 1 take where I drop down and I come up is all one take. The rest is implied. The unracking and racking is there all from the same take.
You know, slight of hand tricks also rely on things being implied. Just saying.0 -
Why are we supposed to be impressed if that is a light weight for you?
Because its light enough that its safe and not dangerous or foolish to do. But at the same time the implied strength needed to do this correctly and safely is quite impressive for how much I weigh at 153 right now.
I mean look at the smoothness. The amount of time spent comfortably in the pocket.
When I raised up it was like I was standing up from a chair effortlessly about to take a walk in the park.
And if you look at the other guy who was doing heavier weight, he actually didn't rack and unrack with no hands, I did it all with no hands. Practically almost my body weight, paused ATG squat. Notice also the fat guy didn't pause, he droped down only for a moment and came up fast and wasn't fully in control like a ninja like how I was.
he unracked and racked 300 pounds. Don't say "he's fat" again, the amount of weight you can lift is not a proportionate ratio to how heavy you are.
It was 300kg not 300lbs.
The point is he used his hands the whole time from setup to rerack. He only went no hands for like a second.
No, the point is it was 300kg not 300lb
Strong understanding of bodyweight to lift ratio.
I guess you just don't get what Im trying to point out.
The guy was built like Bowser from Super Mario Bros, Id expect him to do 600lbs. Heck my 1RM OLY max is nearing 400lbs.
300kg is 660 pounds.....
jesus christ dude
Not really, its actually 661lbs.
If you're gonna correct my general estimation with a specific figure, at least have the correct specific figure.
661.4lbs.
But again, you guys are missing the point. Which is that its relative to how some people have a more mechanical advantage while others are pure muscle and strength conditioning (me).
I think it's because he's much stronger than you are, but whatever you want to think.
I guess Bruce Lee wasn't impressive neither because he only weighed 130lbs.0 -
Why are we supposed to be impressed if that is a light weight for you?
Because its light enough that its safe and not dangerous or foolish to do. But at the same time the implied strength needed to do this correctly and safely is quite impressive for how much I weigh at 153 right now.
I mean look at the smoothness. The amount of time spent comfortably in the pocket.
When I raised up it was like I was standing up from a chair effortlessly about to take a walk in the park.
And if you look at the other guy who was doing heavier weight, he actually didn't rack and unrack with no hands, I did it all with no hands. Practically almost my body weight, paused ATG squat. Notice also the fat guy didn't pause, he droped down only for a moment and came up fast and wasn't fully in control like a ninja like how I was.
he unracked and racked 300 pounds. Don't say "he's fat" again, the amount of weight you can lift is not a proportionate ratio to how heavy you are.
It was 300kg not 300lbs.
The point is he used his hands the whole time from setup to rerack. He only went no hands for like a second.
No, the point is it was 300kg not 300lb
Strong understanding of bodyweight to lift ratio.
I guess you just don't get what Im trying to point out.
The guy was built like Bowser from Super Mario Bros, Id expect him to do 600lbs. Heck my 1RM OLY max is nearing 400lbs.
Oh Em Gee
You made a big deal about 135lb then dismissed the other guy because he was 'fat'. Do the frigging math.
Also, if he can squat over 300kg with no hands - he can squat way more than that with hands (which your alleged 400lb would be).
Also 300kg > 300lb...that was the point.
Also...lets see this squat that turned from over 300lb to nearly 400lb
Also...ever heard of a wilks score?0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Why are we supposed to be impressed if that is a light weight for you?
Because its light enough that its safe and not dangerous or foolish to do. But at the same time the implied strength needed to do this correctly and safely is quite impressive for how much I weigh at 153 right now.
I mean look at the smoothness. The amount of time spent comfortably in the pocket.
When I raised up it was like I was standing up from a chair effortlessly about to take a walk in the park.
And if you look at the other guy who was doing heavier weight, he actually didn't rack and unrack with no hands, I did it all with no hands. Practically almost my body weight, paused ATG squat. Notice also the fat guy didn't pause, he droped down only for a moment and came up fast and wasn't fully in control like a ninja like how I was.
he unracked and racked 300 pounds. Don't say "he's fat" again, the amount of weight you can lift is not a proportionate ratio to how heavy you are.
It was 300kg not 300lbs.
The point is he used his hands the whole time from setup to rerack. He only went no hands for like a second.
No, the point is it was 300kg not 300lb
Strong understanding of bodyweight to lift ratio.
I guess you just don't get what Im trying to point out.
The guy was built like Bowser from Super Mario Bros, Id expect him to do 600lbs. Heck my 1RM OLY max is nearing 400lbs.
Oh Em Gee
You made a big deal about 135lb then dismissed the other guy because he was 'fat'. Do the frigging math.
Also, if he can squat over 300lb with no hands - he can squat way more than that with hands (which your alleged 400lb would be).
Also 300kg > 300lb...that was the point.
Also...lets see this squat that turned from over 300lb to nearly 400lb
Also...ever heard of a wilks score?
No whats wilks score?
whats my score?
Also Zack, I could do the 135lbs like 20 reps easily. 225 like 10.0 -
Why are we supposed to be impressed if that is a light weight for you?
Because its light enough that its safe and not dangerous or foolish to do. But at the same time the implied strength needed to do this correctly and safely is quite impressive for how much I weigh at 153 right now.
I mean look at the smoothness. The amount of time spent comfortably in the pocket.
When I raised up it was like I was standing up from a chair effortlessly about to take a walk in the park.
And if you look at the other guy who was doing heavier weight, he actually didn't rack and unrack with no hands, I did it all with no hands. Practically almost my body weight, paused ATG squat. Notice also the fat guy didn't pause, he droped down only for a moment and came up fast and wasn't fully in control like a ninja like how I was.
he unracked and racked 300 pounds. Don't say "he's fat" again, the amount of weight you can lift is not a proportionate ratio to how heavy you are.
It was 300kg not 300lbs.
The point is he used his hands the whole time from setup to rerack. He only went no hands for like a second.
No, the point is it was 300kg not 300lb
Strong understanding of bodyweight to lift ratio.
I guess you just don't get what Im trying to point out.
The guy was built like Bowser from Super Mario Bros, Id expect him to do 600lbs. Heck my 1RM OLY max is nearing 400lbs.
300kg is 660 pounds.....
jesus christ dude
Not really, its actually 661lbs.
If you're gonna correct my general estimation with a specific figure, at least have the correct specific figure.
661.4lbs.
But again, you guys are missing the point. Which is that its relative to how some people have a more mechanical advantage while others are pure muscle and strength conditioning (me).
Ummmm...no. 300kg x 2.2 = 660lb's.
I thought you knew everything? 0 -
Why are we supposed to be impressed if that is a light weight for you?
Because its light enough that its safe and not dangerous or foolish to do. But at the same time the implied strength needed to do this correctly and safely is quite impressive for how much I weigh at 153 right now.
I mean look at the smoothness. The amount of time spent comfortably in the pocket.
When I raised up it was like I was standing up from a chair effortlessly about to take a walk in the park.
And if you look at the other guy who was doing heavier weight, he actually didn't rack and unrack with no hands, I did it all with no hands. Practically almost my body weight, paused ATG squat. Notice also the fat guy didn't pause, he droped down only for a moment and came up fast and wasn't fully in control like a ninja like how I was.
he unracked and racked 300 pounds. Don't say "he's fat" again, the amount of weight you can lift is not a proportionate ratio to how heavy you are.
It was 300kg not 300lbs.
The point is he used his hands the whole time from setup to rerack. He only went no hands for like a second.
No, the point is it was 300kg not 300lb
Strong understanding of bodyweight to lift ratio.
I guess you just don't get what Im trying to point out.
The guy was built like Bowser from Super Mario Bros, Id expect him to do 600lbs. Heck my 1RM OLY max is nearing 400lbs.
Oh Em Gee
You made a big deal about 135lb then dismissed the other guy because he was 'fat'. Do the frigging math.
Also, if he can squat over 300kg with no hands - he can squat way more than that with hands (which your alleged 400lb would be).
Also 300kg > 300lb...that was the point.
Also...lets see this squat that turned from over 300lb to nearly 400lb
Also...ever heard of a wilks score?
No whats wilks score?
whats my score?
What do you actually squat?0 -
Why are we supposed to be impressed if that is a light weight for you?
Because its light enough that its safe and not dangerous or foolish to do. But at the same time the implied strength needed to do this correctly and safely is quite impressive for how much I weigh at 153 right now.
I mean look at the smoothness. The amount of time spent comfortably in the pocket.
When I raised up it was like I was standing up from a chair effortlessly about to take a walk in the park.
And if you look at the other guy who was doing heavier weight, he actually didn't rack and unrack with no hands, I did it all with no hands. Practically almost my body weight, paused ATG squat. Notice also the fat guy didn't pause, he droped down only for a moment and came up fast and wasn't fully in control like a ninja like how I was.
he unracked and racked 300 pounds. Don't say "he's fat" again, the amount of weight you can lift is not a proportionate ratio to how heavy you are.
It was 300kg not 300lbs.
The point is he used his hands the whole time from setup to rerack. He only went no hands for like a second.
No, the point is it was 300kg not 300lb
Strong understanding of bodyweight to lift ratio.
I guess you just don't get what Im trying to point out.
The guy was built like Bowser from Super Mario Bros, Id expect him to do 600lbs. Heck my 1RM OLY max is nearing 400lbs.
Oh Em Gee
You made a big deal about 135lb then dismissed the other guy because he was 'fat'. Do the frigging math.
Also, if he can squat over 300lb with no hands - he can squat way more than that with hands (which your alleged 400lb would be).
Also 300kg > 300lb...that was the point.
Also...lets see this squat that turned from over 300lb to nearly 400lb
Also...ever heard of a wilks score?
No whats wilks score?
whats my score?
Also Zack, I could do the 135lbs like 20 reps easily. 225 like 10.
With or without hands?0 -
Why are we supposed to be impressed if that is a light weight for you?
Because its light enough that its safe and not dangerous or foolish to do. But at the same time the implied strength needed to do this correctly and safely is quite impressive for how much I weigh at 153 right now.
I mean look at the smoothness. The amount of time spent comfortably in the pocket.
When I raised up it was like I was standing up from a chair effortlessly about to take a walk in the park.
And if you look at the other guy who was doing heavier weight, he actually didn't rack and unrack with no hands, I did it all with no hands. Practically almost my body weight, paused ATG squat. Notice also the fat guy didn't pause, he droped down only for a moment and came up fast and wasn't fully in control like a ninja like how I was.
he unracked and racked 300 pounds. Don't say "he's fat" again, the amount of weight you can lift is not a proportionate ratio to how heavy you are.
It was 300kg not 300lbs.
The point is he used his hands the whole time from setup to rerack. He only went no hands for like a second.
No, the point is it was 300kg not 300lb
Strong understanding of bodyweight to lift ratio.
I guess you just don't get what Im trying to point out.
The guy was built like Bowser from Super Mario Bros, Id expect him to do 600lbs. Heck my 1RM OLY max is nearing 400lbs.
300kg is 660 pounds.....
jesus christ dude
Not really, its actually 661lbs.
If you're gonna correct my general estimation with a specific figure, at least have the correct specific figure.
661.4lbs.
But again, you guys are missing the point. Which is that its relative to how some people have a more mechanical advantage while others are pure muscle and strength conditioning (me).
Ummmm...no. 300kg x 2.2 = 660lb's. I thought you knew everything?
Looooool
You are incorrect.
Its not 2.2.
Its 2.20462.
I do know everything.0 -
Why are we supposed to be impressed if that is a light weight for you?
Because its light enough that its safe and not dangerous or foolish to do. But at the same time the implied strength needed to do this correctly and safely is quite impressive for how much I weigh at 153 right now.
I mean look at the smoothness. The amount of time spent comfortably in the pocket.
When I raised up it was like I was standing up from a chair effortlessly about to take a walk in the park.
And if you look at the other guy who was doing heavier weight, he actually didn't rack and unrack with no hands, I did it all with no hands. Practically almost my body weight, paused ATG squat. Notice also the fat guy didn't pause, he droped down only for a moment and came up fast and wasn't fully in control like a ninja like how I was.
he unracked and racked 300 pounds. Don't say "he's fat" again, the amount of weight you can lift is not a proportionate ratio to how heavy you are.
It was 300kg not 300lbs.
The point is he used his hands the whole time from setup to rerack. He only went no hands for like a second.
No, the point is it was 300kg not 300lb
Strong understanding of bodyweight to lift ratio.
I guess you just don't get what Im trying to point out.
The guy was built like Bowser from Super Mario Bros, Id expect him to do 600lbs. Heck my 1RM OLY max is nearing 400lbs.
Oh Em Gee
You made a big deal about 135lb then dismissed the other guy because he was 'fat'. Do the frigging math.
Also, if he can squat over 300lb with no hands - he can squat way more than that with hands (which your alleged 400lb would be).
Also 300kg > 300lb...that was the point.
Also...lets see this squat that turned from over 300lb to nearly 400lb
Also...ever heard of a wilks score?
No whats wilks score?
whats my score?
Also Zack, I could do the 135lbs like 20 reps easily. 225 like 10.
With or without hands?
With at 3850 -
This content has been removed.
-
Why are we supposed to be impressed if that is a light weight for you?
Because its light enough that its safe and not dangerous or foolish to do. But at the same time the implied strength needed to do this correctly and safely is quite impressive for how much I weigh at 153 right now.
I mean look at the smoothness. The amount of time spent comfortably in the pocket.
When I raised up it was like I was standing up from a chair effortlessly about to take a walk in the park.
And if you look at the other guy who was doing heavier weight, he actually didn't rack and unrack with no hands, I did it all with no hands. Practically almost my body weight, paused ATG squat. Notice also the fat guy didn't pause, he droped down only for a moment and came up fast and wasn't fully in control like a ninja like how I was.
he unracked and racked 300 pounds. Don't say "he's fat" again, the amount of weight you can lift is not a proportionate ratio to how heavy you are.
It was 300kg not 300lbs.
The point is he used his hands the whole time from setup to rerack. He only went no hands for like a second.
No, the point is it was 300kg not 300lb
Strong understanding of bodyweight to lift ratio.
I guess you just don't get what Im trying to point out.
The guy was built like Bowser from Super Mario Bros, Id expect him to do 600lbs. Heck my 1RM OLY max is nearing 400lbs.
300kg is 660 pounds.....
jesus christ dude
Not really, its actually 661lbs.
If you're gonna correct my general estimation with a specific figure, at least have the correct specific figure.
661.4lbs.
But again, you guys are missing the point. Which is that its relative to how some people have a more mechanical advantage while others are pure muscle and strength conditioning (me).
Ummmm...no. 300kg x 2.2 = 660lb's. I thought you knew everything?
Looooool
You are incorrect.
Its not 2.2.
Its 2.20462.
I do know everything.
Wow, you really are full of yourself, aren't you? Sorry, that wasn't precise enough for you. I guess it's good enough for the medical field, but not for your weight lifting comparison, huh. 0 -
Google automatic calculation knows everything, you mean.
No, this went down on Siri.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Wow, you really are full of yourself, aren't you? Sorry, that wasn't precise enough for you. I guess it's good enough for the medical field, but not for your weight lifting comparison, huh.
The medical field is a joke.
But thats another thread.0 -
Meh, seen better...
0 -
Wow, you really are full of yourself, aren't you? Sorry, that wasn't precise enough for you. I guess it's good enough for the medical field, but not for your weight lifting comparison, huh.
The medical field is a joke.
But thats another thread.
The medical field will keep that in mind when you need us. Perhaps maybe when you break your neck trying to show off on MFP again. 0 -
I guess Bruce Lee wasn't impressive neither because he only weighed 130lbs.
I don't really know much about Bruce Lee
you also missed my edit on my other post: "And if we're comparing weight to lift straight up, he's squatting 4.88(repeating) times what you are, and I'm sure he doesn't weigh 753 pounds"
He is squatting 687.5lb x 9 here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nI-RMQps4M 0 -
Why are we supposed to be impressed if that is a light weight for you?
Because its light enough that its safe and not dangerous or foolish to do. But at the same time the implied strength needed to do this correctly and safely is quite impressive for how much I weigh at 153 right now.
I mean look at the smoothness. The amount of time spent comfortably in the pocket.
When I raised up it was like I was standing up from a chair effortlessly about to take a walk in the park.
And if you look at the other guy who was doing heavier weight, he actually didn't rack and unrack with no hands, I did it all with no hands. Practically almost my body weight, paused ATG squat. Notice also the fat guy didn't pause, he droped down only for a moment and came up fast and wasn't fully in control like a ninja like how I was.
he unracked and racked 300 pounds. Don't say "he's fat" again, the amount of weight you can lift is not a proportionate ratio to how heavy you are.
It was 300kg not 300lbs.
The point is he used his hands the whole time from setup to rerack. He only went no hands for like a second.
No, the point is it was 300kg not 300lb
Strong understanding of bodyweight to lift ratio.
I guess you just don't get what Im trying to point out.
The guy was built like Bowser from Super Mario Bros, Id expect him to do 600lbs. Heck my 1RM OLY max is nearing 400lbs.
300kg is 660 pounds.....
jesus christ dude
Not really, its actually 661lbs.
If you're gonna correct my general estimation with a specific figure, at least have the correct specific figure.
661.4lbs.
But again, you guys are missing the point. Which is that its relative to how some people have a more mechanical advantage while others are pure muscle and strength conditioning (me).
Ummmm...no. 300kg x 2.2 = 660lb's. I thought you knew everything?
Looooool
You are incorrect.
Its not 2.2.
Its 2.20462.
I do know everything.
You didn't know what a wilks score was.0 -
Why are we supposed to be impressed if that is a light weight for you?
Because its light enough that its safe and not dangerous or foolish to do. But at the same time the implied strength needed to do this correctly and safely is quite impressive for how much I weigh at 153 right now.
I mean look at the smoothness. The amount of time spent comfortably in the pocket.
When I raised up it was like I was standing up from a chair effortlessly about to take a walk in the park.
And if you look at the other guy who was doing heavier weight, he actually didn't rack and unrack with no hands, I did it all with no hands. Practically almost my body weight, paused ATG squat. Notice also the fat guy didn't pause, he droped down only for a moment and came up fast and wasn't fully in control like a ninja like how I was.
he unracked and racked 300 pounds. Don't say "he's fat" again, the amount of weight you can lift is not a proportionate ratio to how heavy you are.
It was 300kg not 300lbs.
The point is he used his hands the whole time from setup to rerack. He only went no hands for like a second.
No, the point is it was 300kg not 300lb
Strong understanding of bodyweight to lift ratio.
I guess you just don't get what Im trying to point out.
The guy was built like Bowser from Super Mario Bros, Id expect him to do 600lbs. Heck my 1RM OLY max is nearing 400lbs.
Oh Em Gee
You made a big deal about 135lb then dismissed the other guy because he was 'fat'. Do the frigging math.
Also, if he can squat over 300lb with no hands - he can squat way more than that with hands (which your alleged 400lb would be).
Also 300kg > 300lb...that was the point.
Also...lets see this squat that turned from over 300lb to nearly 400lb
Also...ever heard of a wilks score?
No whats wilks score?
whats my score?
Also Zack, I could do the 135lbs like 20 reps easily. 225 like 10.
With or without hands?
With at 385
Have any vids?0 -
Google automatic calculation knows everything, you mean.
No, this went down on Siri.
Ok, so Bing then.
Bing? No, incorrect,
...it was sourced directly from Wolfram alpha...0 -
Dear bb.com,
We at MFP would greatly appreciate it if you would consider lifting the ban on Nutellabrah.
Thank you for your time,
Cranquistador
I dunno he's kinda growing on me. He has a pretty nuanced albeit fairly obvious style of trolling and people dumb enough not to see that he's a troll deserve to get trolled.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Dear bb.com,
We at MFP would greatly appreciate it if you would consider lifting the ban on Nutellabrah.
Thank you for your time,
Cranquistador
I dunno he's kinda growing on me. He has a pretty nuanced albeit fairly obvious style of trolling and people dumb enough not to see that he's a troll deserve to get trolled.
Ehhh...what can I say. Kids are in bed, n I have nothing better to do. This thread is keeping me entertained.
0 -
Meh. If you are squatting correctly your hands aren't really doing much anyway.....except they're there to grab the bar if a safety issue does happen. I'm not really impressed by people removing safety precautions for show.
When I hurt my back squatting it was on a warm up set with light weight. I missed the hook re-racking it and the bar came down hard lopsided on my back. It was stupid and careless because I felt invincible to the light weight. Luckily it only took 10 weeks of rest and rehab and not something more serious, which it easily could have been. Lesson learned the hard way.0 -
Meh. If you are squatting correctly your hands aren't really doing much anyway.....except they're there to grab the bar if a safety issue does happen. I'm not really impressed by people removing safety precautions for show.
When I hurt my back squatting it was on a warm up set with light weight. I missed the hook re-racking it and the bar came down hard lopsided on my back. It was stupid and careless because I felt invincible to the light weight. Luckily it only took 10 weeks of rest and rehab and not something more serious, which it easily could have been. Lesson learned the hard way.
Ouch. Sorry to hear that.
I promise you though, there was no danger.
I wouldn't have done it if it felt like a risk when I first tried it.
I can powerclean 165. Even if it fell I could just catch it and hold the weight. I can even standing press 140.
Its honestly no big deal.
(but it kind of is)0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Google automatic calculation knows everything, you mean.
No, this went down on Siri.
Ok, so Bing then.
Bing? No, incorrect,
...it was sourced directly from Wolfram alpha...
So Wolfram alpha knows everything.
I wouldn't say "everything."
Only math and science type stuff.
For example if I was looking for information on Movies, Siri would source from Rotten Tomatoes.0 -
This content has been removed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 429 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions