You are smaller than you think you are

notsochunkeymonkey · June 2014

-5%, but hourglass, hrm, never heard that apply to me!

wifeymou1112 · June 2014

7.5% smaller than I thought. I picked the 2nd body and was off the scale left-ways!?

(But I can grab alll kinds of flab?!) Whaaa? Lol

spicy618 · June 2014

I guess I'm more realistic. I'm only 2.5% smaller than I think I am. Which is actually a bummer. I was hoping to be pleasantly surprised.

I was 2.5% smaller also. Hey, at least it was smaller. I'm pmsing, that would have messed up my day. :laugh:

pipertargaryen · June 2014

I'm only 7.5% smaller than I think I am. I guess I know my body

And apparently, I'm the 'perfect hourglass'. THAT was a confidence booster, for sure! I'm between the 4th and 5th bodies.

_Pseudonymous_ · June 2014

I'm about 5% BIGGER than I thought I was... that's disappointing?

Therealobi1 · June 2014

I got mine right, in between 3 and 4, and telling me hourglass.

emmanap91 · June 2014

This is exceedingly inaccurate if you are outside the norms for height. I am very tall, so it said I am larger than I think I am. No, I am not. I look nothing like the picture they picked. Take this site with a grain of salt, if you are very short or very tall.

This was my reaction - I'm guessing it uses the average height for women, which is about 5'4" to 5'5."

brandiuntz · June 2014

5% larger than I think I am.

I think that I look better than all models presented, though. There wasn't really a choice that looked like me.

Agreed about none of the models looking like me. I have more definition than them, which might have thrown me off. I am 7.5% larger than I thought.

_Pseudonymous_ · June 2014

This is exceedingly inaccurate if you are outside the norms for height. I am very tall, so it said I am larger than I think I am. No, I am not. I look nothing like the picture they picked. Take this site with a grain of salt, if you are very short or very tall.

This was my reaction - I'm guessing it uses the average height for women, which is about 5'4" to 5'5."

This makes sense since I am about 5'10". I thought I was being pretty honest with myself and my body, So even though I am big my body shape did NOT resemble that. They should probably have taken that into effect but that would involve more work...

emmanap91 · June 2014

This is exceedingly inaccurate if you are outside the norms for height. I am very tall, so it said I am larger than I think I am. No, I am not. I look nothing like the picture they picked. Take this site with a grain of salt, if you are very short or very tall.

This was my reaction - I'm guessing it uses the average height for women, which is about 5'4" to 5'5."

This makes sense since I am about 5'10". I thought I was being pretty honest with myself and my body, So even though I am big my body shape did NOT resemble that. They should probably have taken that into effect but that would involve more work...

I'm actually really disappointed that they didn't, I don't think it would add too much to their calculations (though I wish they'd be upfront with what they did to calculate this stuff anyway), because height will always be a factor so they must have used something for height in their calculations.

I'm 5'3" and it says I match the model furthest to the left, but I don't think that's accurate. My guess was the third from the left, so I'm probably closest to the second from the left.

darrensurrey · June 2014

QueenBishOTUniverse · June 2014

This is exceedingly inaccurate if you are outside the norms for height. I am very tall, so it said I am larger than I think I am. No, I am not. I look nothing like the picture they picked. Take this site with a grain of salt, if you are very short or very tall.

This was my reaction - I'm guessing it uses the average height for women, which is about 5'4" to 5'5."

This makes sense since I am about 5'10". I thought I was being pretty honest with myself and my body, So even though I am big my body shape did NOT resemble that. They should probably have taken that into effect but that would involve more work...

I'm actually really disappointed that they didn't, I don't think it would add too much to their calculations (though I wish they'd be upfront with what they did to calculate this stuff anyway), because height will always be a factor so they must have used something for height in their calculations.

I'm 5'3" and it says I match the model furthest to the left, but I don't think that's accurate. My guess was the third from the left, so I'm probably closest to the second from the left.

Yup at 5'8" not including height as a factor with the other sizes is an issue.

Achrya · June 2014

I am 2.5% larger than I think, so between the first and second body.

Meh

kittyr77 · June 2014

I guessed the third body and Im half way between 1st and 2nd.
So Im 7.5% smaller than i think i am. Not a bad guess!

MireyGal76 · June 2014

I guessed two body sizes LOWER than it says I am. LOL

I am apparently 10% fatter than I think I am? :laugh:

It doesn't appear to factor in height... being 6'1, I think it stretches out the proportions somewhat.

likitisplit · June 2014

I am 2.5% larger than I think, so between the first and second body.

Meh

That's wack.

jayliospecky · June 2014

I had a difficult time choosing one that I thought looked like me.

But once I picked one, it was almost exactly correct, which surprised me.

likitisplit · June 2014

I guessed two body sizes LOWER than it says I am. LOL

I am apparently 10% fatter than I think I am? :laugh:

It doesn't appear to factor in height... being 6'1, I think it stretches out the proportions somewhat.

And you are off their charts to the left.

Achrya · June 2014

I am 2.5% larger than I think, so between the first and second body.

Meh

That's wack.

I think it's the *kitten*. I do not think (objectively and with no vanity) that I'm larger than the first woman from a head on shot BUT maybe it you turned her to the side it might be something else completely.

Unknown · June 2014

This content has been removed.

amandzor · June 2014

I'm definitely larger than I think I am. Which explains why I let my weight get so bad.

dlionsmane · June 2014

you are 7.5% smaller than you think you are

erobinson2014 · June 2014

kind of a eye opener

QueenBishOTUniverse · June 2014

I am 2.5% larger than I think, so between the first and second body.

Meh

That's wack.

I think it's the *kitten*. I do not think (objectively and with no vanity) that I'm larger than the first woman from a head on shot BUT maybe it you turned her to the side it might be something else completely.

Your *kitten*, my boobs, it's such a burden to bear right? :laugh: I agree though, no way in hell you're bigger than the first model.

YearsWorthOfFAT · June 2014

I am apparently 20% smaller. It says i am similar to the first one model. I don't quite believe it. They haven't seen my monster truck legs.
It didn't have my hip measurements though, and i am short.

BusyRaeNOTBusty · June 2014

I was 2.5% off. But yeah, I'm wondering how height plays into it.

Also the results said:

Pear: Your major curves are at your hips, while your waist and shoulders are a lot smaller.

But then it didn't ask for my shoulder measurements. My shoulders are very wide. Wider than my hips for sure.