Job interview. If I do wear a skirt, do I wear pantyhose?

1234579

Replies

  • jennaworksout
    jennaworksout Posts: 1,739 Member
    People still wear pantyhose????

    hahah I was thinking the same thing! lol

    me too....
  • amyoliver85
    amyoliver85 Posts: 353 Member
    I would say yes, since it's in a large Finance office. But the rules of etiquette for interviews are really based on the place you're interviewing. You should wear what makes you look professional but that you still feel comfortable in. An interviewer is more likely to notice you in a bad way if you are fidgeting in pantyhose than if you are not wearing them.
  • lizdavis07
    lizdavis07 Posts: 766 Member
    I actually have a job interview today for a county government job. I am not wearing pantyhose because I have great legs. Why would I hide them?? :flowerforyou:
  • diadojikohei
    diadojikohei Posts: 732 Member
    Let's hear for stockings and garters!!!! YEA!!!!!!!! And no panties!!

    Ha ha Sharon Stone!!!
  • VelociMama
    VelociMama Posts: 3,119 Member
    No one has ever been offended by an applicant that comes to an interview over dressed. People are frequently offended by an applicant that comes to an interview under dressed. When in doubt always err on the side of more dressy. Pantyhose = yes. Bare legs = no.

    ^ this also.

    Over-dressed is much safer than under-dressed for first interviews. Go in looking polished (nice handbag in good condition, nice shoes, nice but not gaudy jewelry, pressed clean outfit, etc.) and you'll get the interviewer's attention right up front.
  • missdaisy79
    missdaisy79 Posts: 566 Member
    This might be a matter of semantics, but is there a difference between tights and pantyhose? I live in the UK, and I always thought the two were synonymous, but seeing some of the reactions I'm wondering if there's actually a difference between them.

    Also, I would totally wear tights with a skirt and suit jacket for an interview. The darker the tights the better, no one needs to see my tattoos until I'm working for them and they're stuck with me! :wink:
  • VelociMama
    VelociMama Posts: 3,119 Member
    This might be a matter of semantics, but is there a difference between tights and pantyhose? I live in the UK, and I always thought the two were synonymous, but seeing some of the reactions I'm wondering if there's actually a difference between them.

    Also, I would totally wear tights with a skirt and suit jacket for an interview. The darker the tights the better, no one needs to see my tattoos until I'm working for them and they're stuck with me! :wink:

    Tights are much thicker and usually opaque or just barely see-through. Pantyhose are usually sheer and add some color and evenness to the legs.
  • amyoliver85
    amyoliver85 Posts: 353 Member
    In some ways it depends on where you live what will be professional. Florida/California might actually seem very old school and not as appropriate as in the financial districts of Boston and New York. Personally, I think not wearing hose with business attire to an interview is inappropriate. I'm in a business casual office and in a skirt today which I wore hose today ( but that is more to do with pasty white legs even after being out in the sun this summer than a requirement)

    If you are wearing skirt/blazer/suit then wear hose. Once in the office and you see the enviornment, you can adjust for the next interviews. Always dress your best and put foward a complete and professional appearnce from day one.

    Hose is not for old ladies and royalty only. Personal opinion, we have gotten WAY to slack in our appearance and appropriateness in many environments.

    I would disagree. I think that your appearance only plays a small role in your interview. If you are the right person for the job, you should be able to exude that through personality and your answers to the interview questions. If a woman is not used to wearing pantyhose and they make her itchy or uncomfortable, she will come across as unprofessional and intimidated by the position, both big no-nos in an interview.

    I personally NEVER wear pantyhose. I am allergic to the material. That doesn't make me less professional. Not one bit. My professionalism exudes in the rest of my attire and through my personality. Besides the fact, pantyhose serve ZERO purpose except to add some color to your legs. If you have nice looking legs or are comfortable with yourself, there should be no need to wear them.

    Pantyhose are also NOT about professionalism. They were created as a replacement for tights which were used to hide a woman's body because weren't supposed to show off any skin. It's an antiquated ritual that has nothing to do with professionalism and has everything to do with inappropriate control.

    I suggest just not dressing like a slut.
  • happyjoyousfree1
    happyjoyousfree1 Posts: 124 Member
    Simply put: You can never be over dressed or over educated.
    Dress conservatively for business/finance abd you'll never go wrong. First impressions are very important in the business world.
  • WendyTerry420
    WendyTerry420 Posts: 13,274 Member
    So long as women are allowed to wear pants, then I would be fine with that policy. I refuse to work somewhere that puts me in "gender-assigned" clothing.

    There is no company that would say that woman are not allowed to wear pants.

    I wouldn't think so, but I never heard of one that required pantyhose either. These are probably the same type of companies that also want to examine your urine first. I don't work at those type of places.
  • WendyTerry420
    WendyTerry420 Posts: 13,274 Member
    In some ways it depends on where you live what will be professional. Florida/California might actually seem very old school and not as appropriate as in the financial districts of Boston and New York. Personally, I think not wearing hose with business attire to an interview is inappropriate. I'm in a business casual office and in a skirt today which I wore hose today ( but that is more to do with pasty white legs even after being out in the sun this summer than a requirement)

    If you are wearing skirt/blazer/suit then wear hose. Once in the office and you see the enviornment, you can adjust for the next interviews. Always dress your best and put foward a complete and professional appearnce from day one.

    Hose is not for old ladies and royalty only. Personal opinion, we have gotten WAY to slack in our appearance and appropriateness in many environments.

    I would disagree. I think that your appearance only plays a small role in your interview. If you are the right person for the job, you should be able to exude that through personality and your answers to the interview questions. If a woman is not used to wearing pantyhose and they make her itchy or uncomfortable, she will come across as unprofessional and intimidated by the position, both big no-nos in an interview.

    I personally NEVER wear pantyhose. I am allergic to the material. That doesn't make me less professional. Not one bit. My professionalism exudes in the rest of my attire and through my personality. Besides the fact, pantyhose serve ZERO purpose except to add some color to your legs. If you have nice looking legs or are comfortable with yourself, there should be no need to wear them.

    Pantyhose are also NOT about professionalism. They were created as a replacement for tights which were used to hide a woman's body because weren't supposed to show off any skin. It's an antiquated ritual that has nothing to do with professionalism and has everything to do with inappropriate control.

    I suggest just not dressing like a slut.


    Professionalism is more about attitude than about dress style. The way you look is part of it, but the way you communicate is much more important.
  • beckajw
    beckajw Posts: 1,728 Member
    In some ways it depends on where you live what will be professional. Florida/California might actually seem very old school and not as appropriate as in the financial districts of Boston and New York. Personally, I think not wearing hose with business attire to an interview is inappropriate. I'm in a business casual office and in a skirt today which I wore hose today ( but that is more to do with pasty white legs even after being out in the sun this summer than a requirement)

    If you are wearing skirt/blazer/suit then wear hose. Once in the office and you see the enviornment, you can adjust for the next interviews. Always dress your best and put foward a complete and professional appearnce from day one.

    Hose is not for old ladies and royalty only. Personal opinion, we have gotten WAY to slack in our appearance and appropriateness in many environments.

    I would disagree. I think that your appearance only plays a small role in your interview. If you are the right person for the job, you should be able to exude that through personality and your answers to the interview questions. If a woman is not used to wearing pantyhose and they make her itchy or uncomfortable, she will come across as unprofessional and intimidated by the position, both big no-nos in an interview.

    I personally NEVER wear pantyhose. I am allergic to the material. That doesn't make me less professional. Not one bit. My professionalism exudes in the rest of my attire and through my personality. Besides the fact, pantyhose serve ZERO purpose except to add some color to your legs. If you have nice looking legs or are comfortable with yourself, there should be no need to wear them.

    Pantyhose are also NOT about professionalism. They were created as a replacement for tights which were used to hide a woman's body because weren't supposed to show off any skin. It's an antiquated ritual that has nothing to do with professionalism and has everything to do with inappropriate control.

    I suggest just not dressing like a slut.

    Actually, appearance is a very large part in whether you get a job offer or not.

    Pantyhose cover the legs, just as pants do. It has nothing to do with "antiquated rituals". It has to do with professionalism. If men are allowed to wear shorts/skirts without covering their legs, then of course women should be permitted to do the same. However, if men are required to cover their legs, women should be held to the same standard.

    And honestly, when you are going into an interview, it's not about you and your personal beliefs. It's about making the best possible impression on the interviewer. Why take the chance? Put on pantyhose.
  • sexikc
    sexikc Posts: 153 Member
    I've been in corporate America (successfully) for 30 years and haven't owned a pair of pantyhose in 20. When I interview, I think women who wear hose are odd or uptight. Unless your skirt is too short, this should never be an issue... and even then, it's a skirt length issue, not a pantyhose issue. An absurd creation by men for men... nuts. If you're uncomfortable or unsure, wear black slacks.

    SEE!! I told yall...especially the Ms "yeah um ok" lady Lol
  • This thread could use this

    300px-Sample_Pantyhose.jpg
  • vettle
    vettle Posts: 621 Member
    yes, and a suit jacket or black cardigan. If you hate pantyhose or think that it'll make you look uptight (according to someone aparently - I think adding pantyhose makes women look way more professional), then don't wear the skirt!
  • If you want that finance job. . . yes you do. . . .

    if you want to not get it. . . then dont.

    Dress to impress. . . .if its corporate america. . . you ALWAYS wear conservative business attire, if a skirt pantyhose, skirt not above the knee. . . button up blouse, no cleavage showing, nice shoes, hair done....

    Ive been declined a job because of not wearing pantyhose. . they didnt think it was professional

    did you know that pantyhose are considered pants with a skirt?? thats why they were made, to take the place of pants when your not wearing a full length pant leg. . . .
  • rml_16
    rml_16 Posts: 16,414 Member
    One last post -- I am SO GLAD that when I start looking for a new job, some of the people in this thread will be my competition. :laugh:

    Or should I say, people like some of the people in this thread.
  • Ruthe8
    Ruthe8 Posts: 423 Member
    I would disagree. I think that your appearance only plays a small role in your interview.
    How many interviews have you conducted? Or how many professional jobs have you interviewed for successfully?
    Pantyhose are also NOT about professionalism. They were created as a replacement for tights which were used to hide a woman's body because weren't supposed to show off any skin. It's an antiquated ritual that has nothing to do with professionalism and has everything to do with inappropriate control.

    I suggest just not dressing like a slut.
    This is hilarious. First you rant about "inappropriate control" and then you use the word "slut".
  • krissyliz78
    krissyliz78 Posts: 181 Member
    One last post -- I am SO GLAD that when I start looking for a new job, some of the people in this thread will be my competition. :laugh:

    Or should I say, people like some of the people in this thread.

    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ :laugh:
  • tabinmaine
    tabinmaine Posts: 965 Member
    Nothing says corporate and power than a well fitted suit with dress pants...not a skirt. Wear a nice pant suit with a great blouse/shirt and and a long necklace, you can add low heels to it....


    Something like this :
    http://womeninbusiness.about.com/od/businessattireforwomen/ig/Biz-Attire---The-Wow-Factor/The-Classic-Pant-Suit.htm
  • BAMFMeredith
    BAMFMeredith Posts: 2,810 Member
    People still wear pantyhose????

    When they work in corporate America they do..

    I work in corporate America. Nobody here wears pantyhose...not even the CEO of the company (unless it's cold outside---which is like 2 months out of the year), who wears skirts/dresses and heels 4 out of 5 days a week.

    I've been told Austin, TX is REALLY casual compared to everywhere else on earth though so who knows. But yeah, I don't even own pantyhose.
  • sizzle92
    sizzle92 Posts: 1,015 Member
    Thank goodness I wear scrubs. I'd NEVER get a job if granny attire were required. :tongue:
  • Dub_D
    Dub_D Posts: 1,760 Member
    If you want that finance job. . . yes you do. . . .

    if you want to not get it. . . then dont.

    are you for real? where do you people live that you would not be considered for a job for not wearing pantyhose? :laugh:
  • sexikc
    sexikc Posts: 153 Member
    If you want that finance job. . . yes you do. . . .

    if you want to not get it. . . then dont.

    are you for real? where do you people live that you would not be considered for a job for not wearing pantyhose? :laugh:

    I have been trying to figure this out....and that is the conclusion that I have come to...it must be a regional thing. Really OP you dont have to listen to any of us, in fact dont. You need to ask someone who lives in your area...walk around where the professionals hang out in your city during lunch and see what the women are wearing becasue...where I live you can get a job if you dont wear hose some of these people have said some things that are really strange to me. Hosiery is policy, really?? That is crazy......I think in this area someone who wears hosiery would seem to be old fashioned, in sme professions that may be ok but....I think it would give a vibe of you are not up with the times and so you may not be entreprenurial or innovative and too sensitive to change....but that is around here....it sounds like in other places they have been strictly traditional when it comes to business attire...you really just need to go with what if customary in your area
  • Bronx_Montgomery
    Bronx_Montgomery Posts: 2,284 Member
    Short tight dress......No undies.....and occasionally switching your crossed legs. Sharon Stone style
  • _Wits_
    _Wits_ Posts: 1,286 Member
    Yes. Yes Yes Yes!!!
  • corn63
    corn63 Posts: 1,580 Member
    She posted an update....


    She wore a skirt and *drumroll* PANTYHOSE!! :drinker:
  • Faintgreeneyes
    Faintgreeneyes Posts: 729 Member
    I would say no- but that is because I HATE pantyhose.

    I have interviewed and been offered many jobs, and have never worn them with a dress or skirt.
  • _Wits_
    _Wits_ Posts: 1,286 Member
    If you want that finance job. . . yes you do. . . .

    if you want to not get it. . . then dont.

    are you for real? where do you people live that you would not be considered for a job for not wearing pantyhose? :laugh:

    It's a requirement listed on many dress codes in large offices. Course like anything, observe how people in your area, that work in that atmosphere are dressed. To be honest...I would ALWAYS wear them to the interview vs not....if they're not required later on, then no harm.
  • reneepugh
    reneepugh Posts: 522 Member
    Yes, or you could wear some matching tights.