So..no barbells at gym

Options
13468911

Replies

  • waldo56
    waldo56 Posts: 1,861 Member
    Options
    lol @ people who think barbells are necessary for strength training.

    lol @ you.

    They are necessary for strength training. At least for any sort of functional strength. Having your body move on one plane of motion and isolating one muscle is fine for some things, but when your supporting muscles can't handle the weight your major muscles can then you aren't really that strong are you...

    One can get quite strong with bodyweight and dumbbells if you understand and can apply the concept of leverage and how the reduction of it drives perceived load and progression.
  • Halleeon
    Halleeon Posts: 309 Member
    Options
    Went to the local gym for an induction this morning, they have various machines and free weight dumbbells, but no barbells. Point me in the right direction for exercises for these please

    Hi! I wanted to add my two cents, and hopefully they are helpful and positive.

    My gym DOES have barbels, but as a beginner (with back issues as well) I opted to start with the dumbbells. Based on what you wrote, I am thinking you are looking for dumbell exercises.

    I basically did two things: 1. I went to www.bodybuilding.com and found a female role model that had obtained the type of body I want for myself. That happened to be Jamie Eason, who has her own section and body building training (for free) on her site. The link is http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/jamie-eason-livefit-trainer.html

    I signed up for the free program, read all of the info, watched all of the videos and then printed all of the free weight exercises from "Week 1" of the program. Alot of the exercises prescribed were dumbbells!

    I took my printouts to my gym and signed up for an appointment with a trainer. So that would be the #2 thing I did. When I met with my trainer, I made it very clear that I was A. a beginner and intimidated of the free weights section and overcoming that was just as important to me as doing the exercises was B. I have health consideration (including my back issues) D, wanted to learn all of the exercises I had printed and I wanted to C. ensure I was doing the exercises in good form to prevent injury.

    Not only did the trainer help me with A, B, C and D but he also showed me several extra exercises and taught me how to use the cables as well, since certain parts of my body aren't quite ready for free weights, in our opinion.

    When I first started, 5 pound dumbbells gave me quite the workout, now I am up to 15 and those are getting easy. :)

    I love free weights and the empowerment I feel, btw. Just throwing that out there..I know it wasn't part of your question.

    I would also probably check out the rest of the bodybuilding.com website and look for good youtube videos, but if it were me, I would try them for the first time with a trainer, to make sure I was using "good form."

    Hope that helps - good for you for being proactive!

    Edited* changed word barbels to dumbbells :P oops!
  • waldo56
    waldo56 Posts: 1,861 Member
    Options
    Show me the bodyweight routine that allows people to squat over 300 and deadlift over 400 and you can win

    A glute ham raise is a straight up bodyweight exercise. Anyone that can do legit glute-ham raises, the real kind with strength alone reversing the motion and no hip hinging at the bottom (a la not how the GHR bench is typically used), that also has sufficient pull strength and grip strength (most BW folks will be stronger than norm in this area) and isn't a lightweight, should be able to bang out a 400 lb deadlift NO PROBLEM.

    Hell I've never heard of anyone that could do a back lever that didn't also have at least a 2x BW deadlift.

    As for squatting, an extended range shrimp squat (as in foot on something and maintaining an upright torso through full ROM) has very high resistance while being BW alone.

    But you can also weight a pistol squat with DB's to very high resistances. Anyone that can bang out pistols with 2x 50 lb DB's in the front rack position would laugh at a 300 lb back squat.

    Pistols can also be done plyometrically for height and/or distance. BW or with DB's.

    But you can also torture your legs with things like 1 leg wall sits, with a perfectly vertical shin and horizonal femur (have fun with that). likewise grab a few DB's if that becomes too easy.

    As a practical matter though, unilateral strength is much more useful than bilateral. There are far more uses for single leg strength (with all the supporting architecture) than dual leg strength. Single leg strength will have more transfer to the primary real expressions of leg strength (running, jumping, and pushing) than dual leg strength. Not to mention you develop utterly ridiculous balance over time.
  • yoovie
    yoovie Posts: 17,121 Member
    Options
    Yeah Im in the process of switching gyms for this same reason. I cant use the smith machine to do this stuff, its killing my form and preventing me from getting stronger. I need a barbell.

    I NEED A BARBELL.
  • WendyTerry420
    WendyTerry420 Posts: 13,274 Member
    Options


    Doesn't "functional strength" actually *mean* strength you would use in real life situations? That's what I take it to mean anyway. :ohwell:

    Yes. But there aren't a ton of life situations where being able to do pushups or pistol squats have much carryover.

    I can deadlift well, so anytime something needs to be picked up at work, I can usually do it. but thats as far as "functional" as I've seen it.

    I don't know what a pistol squat is, but I can definitely see benefit in being able to lift your own body weight. Being *unable* to do so has left me embarrassed more than once.
  • TexasTroy
    TexasTroy Posts: 477 Member
    Options
    "Strength training" means training to get stronger and is in fact what is under discussion right now. Squatting 300 is still novice level for an average height man and can be achieved in under a year. If a man wants "strength training" to continue to be strength training, then he should be concerned about squatting 300. (yes i know the op is a woman)

    dude...you need to re-think what you think is average. The average adult male cannot squat 300 pounds and IS NOT novice level.
  • waldo56
    waldo56 Posts: 1,861 Member
    Options
    I don't know what a pistol squat is, but I can definitely see benefit in being able to lift your own body weight. Being *unable* to do so has left me embarrassed more than once.

    A pistol squat is a one legged squat.

    People don't hop around like bunnies all day. It is very rare that someone applies strength from both of their legs at the same time.

    When you run you apply strength one leg at a time Sprinting is very much an expression of strength, he who has the most powerful legs can run the fastest. Why do you think they test football players in the 40 yard dash? It is a test of leg strength more than anything else.

    While strong people usually will jump with 2 legs when jumping for maximum height, when applied to athletic uses most jumping will be of the single leg variety (again, jumping is an expression of leg strength).

    Lets say you need to push something. Once its moving you in general won't push legs side by side, each will be independantly pushing and applying force in a walking motion.
  • Pedal_Pusher
    Pedal_Pusher Posts: 1,166 Member
    Options
    different gym?
  • ilovedeadlifts
    ilovedeadlifts Posts: 2,923 Member
    Options


    dude...you need to re-think what you think is average. The average adult male cannot squat 300 pounds and IS NOT novice level.

    I think he meant the average guy who actually lifts can/should squat 300.
    I'd say the average male that has even a remote amount of fitness could squat around 135-185 in their first session.
  • ilovedeadlifts
    ilovedeadlifts Posts: 2,923 Member
    Options
    People don't hop around like bunnies all day. It is very rare that someone applies strength from both of their legs at the same time.

    When you run you apply strength one leg at a time Sprinting is very much an expression of strength, he who has the most powerful legs can run the fastest. Why do you think they test football players in the 40 yard dash? It is a test of leg strength more than anything else.

    While strong people usually will jump with 2 legs when jumping for maximum height, when applied to athletic uses most jumping will be of the single leg variety (again, jumping is an expression of leg strength).

    Lets say you need to push something. Once its moving you in general won't push legs side by side, each will be independantly pushing and applying force in a walking motion.

    They have football players do the 40 yard dash to look at their speed....not just their strength.......speed/strength do have a relation but they aren't really looking for the strength aspect in that test. Otherwise they'd just watch the guys squat.

    And most lineman are planted on both feet, and need to be explosive that way. That's why most box jumps are done with both feet planted.......................
  • WendyTerry420
    WendyTerry420 Posts: 13,274 Member
    Options
    I don't know what a pistol squat is, but I can definitely see benefit in being able to lift your own body weight. Being *unable* to do so has left me embarrassed more than once.

    A pistol squat is a one legged squat.

    People don't hop around like bunnies all day. It is very rare that someone applies strength from both of their legs at the same time.

    When you run you apply strength one leg at a time Sprinting is very much an expression of strength, he who has the most powerful legs can run the fastest. Why do you think they test football players in the 40 yard dash? It is a test of leg strength more than anything else.

    While strong people usually will jump with 2 legs when jumping for maximum height, when applied to athletic uses most jumping will be of the single leg variety (again, jumping is an expression of leg strength).

    Lets say you need to push something. Once its moving you in general won't push legs side by side, each will be independantly pushing and applying force in a walking motion.

    Oh wow! I still can't even do one real squat without weights. It kills my knees. I have been modifying it to be similar to an exercise I used to do in high school for basketball practice. We would get in a "sitting position" against the wall and hold it there. In high school, I could sit like that for a long time. We had to do one minute, then run lines, then one minute again, and so on. I can only hold it for about 10 seconds now. I just weigh too much. I'll get there.

    Thanks for the explanation.
  • TexasTroy
    TexasTroy Posts: 477 Member
    Options


    dude...you need to re-think what you think is average. The average adult male cannot squat 300 pounds and IS NOT novice level.

    I think he meant the average guy who actually lifts can/should squat 300.
    I'd say the average male that has even a remote amount of fitness could squat around 135-185 in their first session.

    Thats still not an appropriate statement. When I was competing, I was 160-170 and only squated 350 and I was a freaking beast. Not sure where he or you workout for but not very many guys the gyms I have trained in even have the guts to put 300 pounds on the bar and squat all the way down. Saying that every guy who is even a novice should squat 300 pounds is like telling every person that has a driver's license that they can drive a race car on the Nascar circuit.
  • wellbert
    wellbert Posts: 3,924 Member
    Options
    It takes a long time to build the trunk up to handle heavy barbell squats. Do you really think a veteran pistol squatter with no specific barbell training could just throw 300lbs on? Maybe if they are used to loading their torso with exercises like handstand pushups. I choose to train the most muscle groups in the least amount of time - which is why I think it's fun and novel that I can do pistol squats, but I get under a barbell when it's time to train.
  • waldo56
    waldo56 Posts: 1,861 Member
    Options
    People don't hop around like bunnies all day. It is very rare that someone applies strength from both of their legs at the same time.

    When you run you apply strength one leg at a time Sprinting is very much an expression of strength, he who has the most powerful legs can run the fastest. Why do you think they test football players in the 40 yard dash? It is a test of leg strength more than anything else.

    While strong people usually will jump with 2 legs when jumping for maximum height, when applied to athletic uses most jumping will be of the single leg variety (again, jumping is an expression of leg strength).

    Lets say you need to push something. Once its moving you in general won't push legs side by side, each will be independantly pushing and applying force in a walking motion.

    They have football players do the 40 yard dash to look at their speed....not just their strength.......speed/strength do have a relation but they aren't really looking for the strength aspect in that test. Otherwise they'd just watch the guys squat.

    And most lineman are planted on both feet, and need to be explosive that way. That's why most box jumps are done with both feet planted.......................

    Sled pushing is very much a unilateral expression of leg strength, that is by far the most aplicable exercise to how lineman apply their strength.

    How much one squats is not particularly useful athletically. Much more important is how that is applied to power production, hence the test how fast they can accelerate and how high and how far they can jump. For as important at the 40 supposedly is for the various positions, the position(s) with the highest correlation between running fast and being good players is the defensive line; big guys that can accelerate fast have super powerful legs.

    Once you pass a certain (very high) point, peak strength inversely affects power production, the gains in strength are outweighed by the slowdown in strength use (hence why top powerlifters don't make good sprinters).
  • ilovedeadlifts
    ilovedeadlifts Posts: 2,923 Member
    Options

    Thats still not an appropriate statement. When I was competing, I was 160-170 and only squated 350 and I was a freaking beast. Not sure where he or you workout for but not very many guys the gyms I have trained in even have the guts to put 300 pounds on the bar and squat all the way down. Saying that every guy who is even a novice should squat 300 pounds is like telling every person that has a driver's license that they can drive a race car on the Nascar circuit.

    I've been competing for less than a year and squat 365 in the 165 class............and I'm no where near the top of the raw competition, nor would I ever label myself a beast, because my lifts aren't really impressive.


    I'm not saying every novice should climb under 315, and I dont believe he was either. I think he was saying that people should strive to put up those numbers.
  • waldo56
    waldo56 Posts: 1,861 Member
    Options
    It takes a long time to build the trunk up to handle heavy barbell squats. Do you really think a veteran pistol squatter with no specific barbell training could just throw 300lbs on? Maybe if they are used to loading their torso with exercises like handstand pushups. I choose to train the most muscle groups in the least amount of time - which is why I think it's fun and novel that I can do pistol squats, but I get under a barbell when it's time to train.

    Chances are the veteran pistol squatter is also moving into lower leverage upper body exercises like L-sits, front levers, and human flags, and laughs at the weak core of the squatter.

    The front lever throttles the whole body just as effectively as a deadlift.
  • ilovedeadlifts
    ilovedeadlifts Posts: 2,923 Member
    Options
    How much one squats is not particularly useful athletically. Much more important is how that is applied to power production, hence the test how fast they can accelerate and how high and how far they can jump. For as important at the 40 supposedly is for the various positions, the position(s) with the highest correlation between running fast and being good players is the defensive line; big guys that can accelerate fast have super powerful legs.

    Once you pass a certain (very high) point, peak strength inversely affects power production, the gains in strength are outweighed by the slowdown in strength use (hence why top powerlifters don't make good sprinters).

    They aren't building lineman by having them do pistol squats, they have them back squatting. Just so you know.
    Probably why top NFL teams consult with Louie Simmons for strength and conditioning.

    As far as the strength adversely affecting speed.......
    I have a hell of a time hitting a 42 inch box at 165 pounds........these guys squat over 1000 pounds, and weight 275+
    Looks like their speed is fine
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLLLYyCmHjI

    Speed should be accounted for in your training to be a better athlete. Like I said, they're related.
  • wellbert
    wellbert Posts: 3,924 Member
    Options
    It takes a long time to build the trunk up to handle heavy barbell squats. Do you really think a veteran pistol squatter with no specific barbell training could just throw 300lbs on? Maybe if they are used to loading their torso with exercises like handstand pushups. I choose to train the most muscle groups in the least amount of time - which is why I think it's fun and novel that I can do pistol squats, but I get under a barbell when it's time to train.

    Chances are the veteran pistol squatter is also moving into lower leverage upper body exercises like L-sits, front levers, and human flags, and laughs at the weak core of the squatter.

    The front lever throttles the whole body just as effectively as a deadlift.

    I'd certainly be interested to see this put to practice.
  • newmooon56
    newmooon56 Posts: 347 Member
    Options
    Gyms are full of ppl that dont know beans about nutrition or even exercise! Not saying all trainers are worthless but any gym that isnt fully stocked or up to date or willing to spend the money to stay up to date or with insurance (so they can have the bar) isnt worth my $20 to go there. (assuming its that cheap considering they lack)

    I loved the gym for years for many reasons. Working out at home, I figured would never happen. My habits are ingrained now and I LOVE saving the money- and could never stick it out without my barbell. Theres something so satisfying about lifting a bar full of weight over my head.
  • waldo56
    waldo56 Posts: 1,861 Member
    Options
    It takes a long time to build the trunk up to handle heavy barbell squats. Do you really think a veteran pistol squatter with no specific barbell training could just throw 300lbs on? Maybe if they are used to loading their torso with exercises like handstand pushups. I choose to train the most muscle groups in the least amount of time - which is why I think it's fun and novel that I can do pistol squats, but I get under a barbell when it's time to train.

    Chances are the veteran pistol squatter is also moving into lower leverage upper body exercises like L-sits, front levers, and human flags, and laughs at the weak core of the squatter.

    The front lever throttles the whole body just as effectively as a deadlift.

    I'd certainly be interested to see this put to practice.

    Well, walk up to a pullup bar and try to do a front lever. Hell try to even do one with your knees tucked to your chest.

    If you can't do 20-30 good form dragon flags your core is way too weak to do a front lever.