Spreadsheet for BMR/TDEE Deficit, Macro calcs, HRM zones

1568101116

Replies

  • Flutterby6
    Flutterby6 Posts: 13 Member
    Bump
  • KeriA
    KeriA Posts: 3,345 Member
    bump, thanks
  • clarkeje1
    clarkeje1 Posts: 1,641 Member
    bump
  • txdahl
    txdahl Posts: 107 Member
    bump
  • KeriA
    KeriA Posts: 3,345 Member
    I just checked this out a bit especially looking at MFP tweeks. I have tried to research what my calorie goal on MFP should be after realizing I wasn't eating enough calories. It is interesting that this spreadsheet is within less than 50 calories of what I determined to be a good goal for me but with alot less effort than what I went through to determine what it should be. It gives me about 46 more calories daily. Thanks again.
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    I just checked this out a bit especially looking at MFP tweeks. I have tried to research what my calorie goal on MFP should be after realizing I wasn't eating enough calories. It is interesting that this spreadsheet is within less than 50 calories of what I determined to be a good goal for me but with alot less effort than what I went through to determine what it should be. It gives me about 46 more calories daily. Thanks again.

    And what's nice with the MFP Tweak tab and a non-sedentary type job, you can still use the Activity Calc on the Simple Setup tab and enter in work hours standing or moving a lot, and then see on the MFP Tweak tab what that is.

    Even many with sedentary jobs are really Lightly Active by MFP terms.

    At least you are setup now for when the weight or bodyfat% comes down and the stats change.
  • mezasu
    mezasu Posts: 42
    Thank you!!
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    Ok, for those that download as an Excel file, there is some formula on the HRM tab that doesn't convert well, and Excel is discarding or changing something.

    I've been over the Excel and Google versions comparing and can't see anything that was changed except a bunch of parentheses are added, but the results are all the same.

    So be aware there is an error on DL.

    The Google spreadsheet has no problem of course since it was written there.

    I made some formatting changes to numbers to day on the other tabs.

    Well, I fixed something, not really sure what. Or Google converts to Excel without an issue.

    Either way, last few times saving it and opening in Excel had no comments of an issue.

    Also corrected some visual things to display numbers in text lines better, only about 4 of those total though.
  • Juliann4k9
    Juliann4k9 Posts: 36 Member
    bump
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    Awesome! Thank you!

    Hope that's from actual usage and not just looking it over.

    Starting to wonder if Google's Excel conversion is on the fly and changes accuracy sometimes.
  • Whimzeee
    Whimzeee Posts: 152 Member
    Gonna keep you for further experimentation! :flowerforyou:
  • Lisa760
    Lisa760 Posts: 113 Member
    bump
  • olympian41
    olympian41 Posts: 17 Member
    ,,, and now I know how I'm spending my evening #NumberCrunchingAfterAbCrunching
  • jeleclekat
    jeleclekat Posts: 124 Member
    thanks for sharing -
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    ,,, and now I know how I'm spending my evening #NumberCrunchingAfterAbCrunching

    And if you really get into it - brain numbing formula crunching!

    Though indeed, I'd stick with playing with numbers first.
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    So someone asked about when the Simple Setup TDEG would switch from using a deficit method based on amount to lose to a more traditional TDEE - % Deficit method.

    So I ran weekly numbers on the example person the spreadsheet is based on. The OP at the bottom of post shares those figures.

    18 weeks.
    Starting out losing 2 lbs weekly, eventually reaching 1.2 lbs.
    Moving from weight 230 to 200 (avg 1.7 weekly).
    Went from needing to lose 100 lbs to 70.
    Bodyfat% from 45.4% to 37.1%.
    LBM stayed the same about. (but actually would likely increase with all the exercise and eating right). So did BMR of course.
    TDEG slowly raised from 1605 to 1905 with one deficit method, until 70 lbs and switching to 2012 with other deficit method.
    Deficit went from 39% to 23% off TDEE. So just as less to lose, less is at deficit, more to lose allows more deficit.
    Fat mass went from 104 to 74 lbs.

    From this point out, our sample gal will move from 23% deficit to TDEE down to 10% until goal weight.
  • loranch
    loranch Posts: 94 Member
    Bump
  • c2111
    c2111 Posts: 693 Member
    Handy thanks :)
  • dancerom
    dancerom Posts: 174 Member
    bump
  • wellbur
    wellbur Posts: 240 Member
    bump
  • Topsking2010
    Topsking2010 Posts: 2,245 Member
    Bump
  • firedupfriend
    firedupfriend Posts: 140 Member
    bump
  • lynda155
    lynda155 Posts: 112 Member
    bump
  • olong
    olong Posts: 255 Member
    bump to find again after I input my numbers....
  • BuzzyLizzy77
    BuzzyLizzy77 Posts: 42 Member
    bump
  • Barbell_Jules
    Barbell_Jules Posts: 358 Member
    Bump
  • lh1626
    lh1626 Posts: 241 Member
    Bump
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    bump to find again after I input my numbers....

    Did ya find them!
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    Handy thanks :)

    Welcome, hope useful as it's been to many.
  • ibach08
    ibach08 Posts: 61 Member
    Brilliant! Thanks for sharing:)