Zimmerman vs. Martin

191012141519

Replies

  • Posts: 553 Member
    Firstly, it's The State of Florida vs. Zimmerman.

    Second, he was legally within his rights to carry his weapon. He had all permits and a legal purchase.

    Third, this was a 6', 17 year old young man. Martin was hardly a 'child'. He was the one who came at Zimmerman first. He was beating the crap out of Zimmerman, the police photos and medical documents prove that.

    Fourth, sorry but it was self-defense.

    Fifth, Second Degree Murder is over-charging Zimmerman. The State will never get that, and if they do, then there's something rotten in Denmark.

    Sixth, the Judge should be disbarred for here conduct and biased.

    Seventh, who really cares at this point. There's other things to get pissed about.

    Yeah, it's really self-defense when you're the one who pursued an unarmed person eating skittles. Totally. If a stranger pursued me as I was walking along minding my own business, I'd have beat the **** out of him too. Speaking of, you're playing pretty fast and loose with the term "beating the **** out of..." I've had a paper-cut produce a lot of blood, that doesn't speak to the actual injury. Lastly, if anyone was standing their ground, it was Martin.
  • Posts: 805 Member

    Yea, opinions here aren't looked upon well. Just leave if you don't like it. Are the the MFP neighborhhod watch or something?

    I hope the mods let this keep going. Doubtful, but maybe one of them will be like "you know, this is fascinating, let's let them keep going". Maybe we'll get to see a part 2?
  • Posts: 938 Member

    lol like you know any more.

    Hyuck... I live in Orlando. The case is televised at all times while court is in session on all local channels here. Trust me, we watch the EVIDENCE being presented. I guarantee I know more about this case than you. But you beat that 'justice' drum brah...
  • Posts: 188 Member

    Yea, opinions here aren't looked upon well. Just leave if you don't like it. Are the the MFP neighborhhod watch or something?



    Nope, but evidently you are all a bunch of children who really don't know when enough is enough! This is turning into name calling and ridiculous accusations about people none of you even know! Grow up!!
  • Posts: 1,296 Member

    what day was this? i do have a life and havent followed every second of the trial cheering on GZ like you have. :D

    I haven't cheered anyone on. I don't remember what day it was but it was the girl Trayvon was talking to on the phone. She was caught in many lies and was frustrated the entire time because she was being asked questions.
  • Posts: 16,913 Member

    I'm sorry, I'm not talking about filling out a form. I'm talking about the media and how they like to use words to fit into their story. Of course Hispanics can be white. But if you listen to the talking heads, they go out of their way to not call him Hispanic (or brown).

    Now, Al Sharpton has a commercial running on MSNBC that talks about equal justice for all. It all stems from the gay marriage debate, but his wording goes something like 'whether you're black, white, brown, straight or gay'. So since he's saying brown in his commercial (we all know that means Hispanic, don't we?), why can't he call Zimmerman brown when he's talking about him and the trial. Let's not call him White Al...let's call him Brown!

    Brown =/= hispanic tho? Brown commonly refers to those from Mexico, P.R., Cuba, and places of that nature. It is a direct comment on the color of their skin, a light than that of a 'black' person but darker than that of 'white' people. Because, of course, brown people are of mixed racial descent. Brown is not a race.

    Calling GZ brown would be inaccurate. Calling him Hispanic however would be accurate and perhaps they should. However that didn't seem to be your point.

    Also Al Sharpton is a moron. I would hardly look to him for consistency or sense of any kind.
  • Posts: 3,750 Member
    Hyuck... I live in Orlando. The case is televised at all times while court is in session on all local channels here. Trust me, we watch the EVIDENCE being presented. I guarantee I know more about this case than you. But you beat that 'justice' drum brah...

    heh u probably have been following it more by choice or not. :D
  • Posts: 938 Member

    Yeah, it's really self-defense when you're the one who pursued an unarmed person eating skittles. Totally. If a stranger pursued me as I was walking along minding my own business, I'd have beat the **** out of him too. Speaking of, you're playing pretty fast and loose with the term "beating the **** out of..." I've had a paper-cut produce a lot of blood, that doesn't speak to the actual injury. Lastly, if anyone was standing their ground, it was Martin.

    *sigh* yet another 'emotional' response... SMH.
  • Posts: 44 Member
    I'm not sure if anywhere in the US will be a good place to be if he walks. I'm hoping I'm wrong and people have some sense, though.

    I hope you're wrong too but I don't have a good feeling about this.
  • Posts: 506 Member
    Why do you hope he is found guilty?

    Is it because the news shows Martin as a 10 year old kid in all his pics? Martin was a thug, drug dealer, "gangster", etc..

    Do I think Zimmerman is an idiot want to be cop? Yes. But he will never get changed with murder 2.

    All of Zimmerman's story is lining up as well. He's going to walk and there will be a huge race war over nothing.

    God I hate this world.

    Perfect response. Bottom line...a person died by the hand of another.
  • Posts: 881 Member
    Zimmerman is a murderer who killed an unarmed boy. His story completely falls apart when you look at it, or give it any scrutiny. I think you need to be pretty ideological to buy his version of events. I hope he goes away for a long time, people like him are dangerous to society.
  • Posts: 1,296 Member


    keep justifying the murder of a young man. im just glad this case will lead to tighter gun laws. get them out of the hands of wanna be cops like GZ.

    It won't lead to tighter gun laws. And look at the cities that have tighter gun laws, they are the murder capitals of the US. But it's ok, it's criminals killing people instead of someone defending themself against a criminal.
  • Posts: 3,750 Member




    Nope, but evidently you are all a bunch of children who really don't know when enough is enough! This is turning into name calling and ridiculous accusations about people none of you even know! Grow up!!

    why do you care? just DONT CLICK THE THREAD.
  • Posts: 938 Member

    heh u probably have been following it more by choice or not. :D

    This makes no sense... why would I NOT follow it? It's called forming an opinion based on EVIDENCE... not emotion. You would make a sh*tty juror.
  • Posts: 1,296 Member

    Martin was not committing those crimes at the time of the incident. Stalking IS a crime, and being a volunteer neighborhood watch does not put one above the law. All neighborhood watches are instructed by police to report suspicious activity NOT engage or attempt to apprehend!!

    when did he attempt to apprehend? His first encounter with Martin was being attacked.
  • Posts: 553 Member

    *sigh* yet another 'emotional' response... SMH.

    I get that way when I'm surrounded by morons.
  • Posts: 253 Member



    "That's real retarded Sir... real retarded."

    (see what I did there?)


    :wink:
  • ready for this case to be over............not gonna give my opinion on it, but curious to see what everyone else thinks
  • Posts: 1,241 Member



    Nope, but evidently you are all a bunch of children who really don't know when enough is enough! This is turning into name calling and ridiculous accusations about people none of you even know! Grow up!!
    Oh... Kinda like calling us "children?" That's tantamount to name-calling as well, honey. Pot, meet kettle.
  • Posts: 938 Member
    Zimmerman is a murderer who killed an unarmed boy. His story completely falls apart when you look at it, or give it any scrutiny. I think you need to be pretty ideological to buy his version of events. I hope he goes away for a long time, people like him are dangerous to society.

    So are people who don't examine evidence without emotion.
  • Posts: 529 Member

    Yea, opinions here aren't looked upon well. Just leave if you don't like it. Are the the MFP neighborhhod watch or something?


    I apologize the thread has gone in the direction it has. I clearly wanted to be peaceful about it, but different views bring on things like this. I personally enjoy reading different views about things.It does not upset me, nor should it upset anyone else. I believe that is what makes the world so diverse. So, again I apologize to anyone that I offended by posting this. Please accept :flowerforyou: for you :smile: Have a great day!
  • Posts: 1,296 Member
    You can't chase someone down, then shoot when attacked and call it self-defense. He had no business following the kid. He was specifically told not to. He was trying to be a hero and it back-fired. He's guilty.

    Actually, yes you can. What you can't do is attack someone for following you, especially neighborhhod watch, security, etc.
  • Posts: 3,750 Member

    It won't lead to tighter gun laws. And look at the cities that have tighter gun laws, they are the murder capitals of the US. But it's ok, it's criminals killing people instead of someone defending themself against a criminal.

    ok so Obama wont use this to tighten gun laws then...im glad you agree. :) (this surprises me)
  • Posts: 805 Member
    ready for this case to be over............not gonna give my opinion on it, but curious to see what everyone else thinks

    You got 14 pages of opinions right here :laugh: have fun, grab some popcorn while you're at it
  • Posts: 938 Member
    I get that way when I'm surrounded by morons.

    ...and now the mature name-calling.
  • Posts: 44 Member
  • Posts: 1,203 Member

    Actually, yes you can. What you can't do is attack someone for following you, especially neighborhhod watch, security, etc.

    GZ never announced who he was. So yes, I would feel threatened by someone who was chasing me.
  • Posts: 16
    From my understanding, a young man was walking through a gated community, talking on the phone, while he made his way back to his place after buying snacks at a convenience store.

    And some dude, under the guise of being part of a neighborhood watch, accosted him. AFTER the police told him not to.

    Now, if some son of a b approached me, and I told him to back off, and he didn't and we got into a scuffle where I ended up getting shot?

    Who is guilty? What, if someone approaches me in a confrontational way, I'm not supposed to defend myself?

    I don't care if Trayvon is percieved as a child or a thug. He was minding his own business and Zimmerman instigated. Had Zimmerman done what the police TOLD him to do, Trayvon would have kept on walking and none of this would have happened.

    This is my take on it. And it doesn't matter to me that Trayvon got in trouble at school or smoked pot. He is 17. Lots of kids behave this way and grow up to be 100% awesome contributing members of society.

    Trayvon didn't get the chance to do that because a grown assed man approached him and started a fight. Unreal.
  • Posts: 50 Member

    ^^^this.

    !
  • Posts: 1,296 Member

    Yeah, it's really self-defense when you're the one who pursued an unarmed person eating skittles. Totally. If a stranger pursued me as I was walking along minding my own business, I'd have beat the **** out of him too. Speaking of, you're playing pretty fast and loose with the term "beating the **** out of..." I've had a paper-cut produce a lot of blood, that doesn't speak to the actual injury. Lastly, if anyone was standing their ground, it was Martin.

    I hope you don't really beat someone that you think is following you. If you do you may end up shot as well. This is very stupid logic.
This discussion has been closed.