We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!
You are smaller than you think you are
Replies
-
-5%, but hourglass, hrm, never heard that apply to me!0
-
7.5% smaller than I thought. I picked the 2nd body and was off the scale left-ways!?
(But I can grab alll kinds of flab?!) Whaaa? Lol0 -
I guess I'm more realistic. I'm only 2.5% smaller than I think I am. Which is actually a bummer. I was hoping to be pleasantly surprised.
I was 2.5% smaller also. Hey, at least it was smaller. I'm pmsing, that would have messed up my day. :laugh:0 -
I'm only 7.5% smaller than I think I am. I guess I know my body
And apparently, I'm the 'perfect hourglass'. THAT was a confidence booster, for sure! I'm between the 4th and 5th bodies.
0 -
I'm about 5% BIGGER than I thought I was... that's disappointing?0
-
I got mine right, in between 3 and 4, and telling me hourglass.0
-
This is exceedingly inaccurate if you are outside the norms for height. I am very tall, so it said I am larger than I think I am. No, I am not. I look nothing like the picture they picked. Take this site with a grain of salt, if you are very short or very tall.
This was my reaction - I'm guessing it uses the average height for women, which is about 5'4" to 5'5."0 -
5% larger than I think I am.
I think that I look better than all models presented, though. There wasn't really a choice that looked like me.
Agreed about none of the models looking like me. I have more definition than them, which might have thrown me off. I am 7.5% larger than I thought.0 -
This is exceedingly inaccurate if you are outside the norms for height. I am very tall, so it said I am larger than I think I am. No, I am not. I look nothing like the picture they picked. Take this site with a grain of salt, if you are very short or very tall.
This was my reaction - I'm guessing it uses the average height for women, which is about 5'4" to 5'5."
This makes sense since I am about 5'10". I thought I was being pretty honest with myself and my body, So even though I am big my body shape did NOT resemble that. They should probably have taken that into effect but that would involve more work...0 -
This is exceedingly inaccurate if you are outside the norms for height. I am very tall, so it said I am larger than I think I am. No, I am not. I look nothing like the picture they picked. Take this site with a grain of salt, if you are very short or very tall.
This was my reaction - I'm guessing it uses the average height for women, which is about 5'4" to 5'5."
This makes sense since I am about 5'10". I thought I was being pretty honest with myself and my body, So even though I am big my body shape did NOT resemble that. They should probably have taken that into effect but that would involve more work...
I'm actually really disappointed that they didn't, I don't think it would add too much to their calculations (though I wish they'd be upfront with what they did to calculate this stuff anyway), because height will always be a factor so they must have used something for height in their calculations.
I'm 5'3" and it says I match the model furthest to the left, but I don't think that's accurate. My guess was the third from the left, so I'm probably closest to the second from the left.0 -
0
-
This is exceedingly inaccurate if you are outside the norms for height. I am very tall, so it said I am larger than I think I am. No, I am not. I look nothing like the picture they picked. Take this site with a grain of salt, if you are very short or very tall.
This was my reaction - I'm guessing it uses the average height for women, which is about 5'4" to 5'5."
This makes sense since I am about 5'10". I thought I was being pretty honest with myself and my body, So even though I am big my body shape did NOT resemble that. They should probably have taken that into effect but that would involve more work...
I'm actually really disappointed that they didn't, I don't think it would add too much to their calculations (though I wish they'd be upfront with what they did to calculate this stuff anyway), because height will always be a factor so they must have used something for height in their calculations.
I'm 5'3" and it says I match the model furthest to the left, but I don't think that's accurate. My guess was the third from the left, so I'm probably closest to the second from the left.
Yup at 5'8" not including height as a factor with the other sizes is an issue.0 -
I am 2.5% larger than I think, so between the first and second body.
Meh0 -
I guessed the third body and Im half way between 1st and 2nd.
So Im 7.5% smaller than i think i am. Not a bad guess!0 -
I guessed two body sizes LOWER than it says I am. LOL
I am apparently 10% fatter than I think I am? :laugh:
It doesn't appear to factor in height... being 6'1, I think it stretches out the proportions somewhat.0 -
I am 2.5% larger than I think, so between the first and second body.
Meh
That's wack.0 -
I had a difficult time choosing one that I thought looked like me.
But once I picked one, it was almost exactly correct, which surprised me.0 -
I guessed two body sizes LOWER than it says I am. LOL
I am apparently 10% fatter than I think I am? :laugh:
It doesn't appear to factor in height... being 6'1, I think it stretches out the proportions somewhat.
And you are off their charts to the left.0 -
I am 2.5% larger than I think, so between the first and second body.
Meh
That's wack.
I think it's the *kitten*. I do not think (objectively and with no vanity) that I'm larger than the first woman from a head on shot BUT maybe it you turned her to the side it might be something else completely.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
I'm definitely larger than I think I am. Which explains why I let my weight get so bad.0
-
you are 7.5% smaller than you think you are0
-
kind of a eye opener0
-
I am 2.5% larger than I think, so between the first and second body.
Meh
That's wack.
I think it's the *kitten*. I do not think (objectively and with no vanity) that I'm larger than the first woman from a head on shot BUT maybe it you turned her to the side it might be something else completely.
Your *kitten*, my boobs, it's such a burden to bear right? :laugh: I agree though, no way in hell you're bigger than the first model.0 -
I am apparently 20% smaller. It says i am similar to the first one model. I don't quite believe it. They haven't seen my monster truck legs.
It didn't have my hip measurements though, and i am short.0 -
I was 2.5% off. But yeah, I'm wondering how height plays into it.
Also the results said:
Pear: Your major curves are at your hips, while your waist and shoulders are a lot smaller.
But then it didn't ask for my shoulder measurements. My shoulders are very wide. Wider than my hips for sure.0 -
I apparently have no delusions about my size whatsoever.0
-
10%! Yay!0
-
I am 22.5% smaller than I think I am. I am also a perfect hourglass figure.0
-
Wow... I'm 17.5% smaller than I think I am. Apparently the perfect hourglass. Thank you OP0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.7K Fitness and Exercise
- 392 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 927 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions