Who eats back exercise calories and who doesn't?

Im glad you explained what it was because I hadnt heard of it! Im with you. Im trying to burn calories not replace them. I can understand the idea thatyou need to give your body sone protein after a workout, that makes sense to me.....altho i dont do it

I do not eat back the exercise calories I burned. It is really counter productive to do that.

I have to be completely miserable and dying for me to eat back something I worked so hard to burn... LOL

Phoebeg1723 wrote: »

just curious at the ratios. I personally don't eat back exercise calories. It seems very backwards to me as the idea of working out is too increase the calorie deficit so you lose weight more, but eating back those calories is basically the equivalent of not having worked out.

Anyone else?

MFP is designed to calculate your activity level not including exercise, and set your calorie deficit to lose weight even if you don't exercise. By exercising and increasing your calorie deficit, you may lose weight faster but at the risk of losing lean muscle mass and potentially other negative effects if your calorie goal is too low to be able to maintain adequate nutrition.

That being said, many of the calorie burn estimates in MFP databases can be inflated which is why many who use this approach recommend only eating back a portion of your exercise calories. Another alternative is to use a TDEE approach which factors estimated calorie burns from exercise into your total daily energy expenditure, and when you use this approach you simply eat the same number of calories every day and don't log a calorie burn from exercise into MFP.

If I burn larger amounts, I do. I am doing strength routines as well, and eating too few calories can cause your body to burn muscle instead of fat. I want to get lean, and strong. I'm also not in a rush to lose weight.

If you are following MFP the way it is designed you should eat back your exercise calories as your deficit is already included in the calorie goal it's giving you.

You exercise for health not to lose weight quicker by creating a larger deficit.

http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/818082/exercise-calories-again-wtf/p1

Here is the rule. Careful it's long (copied from a thread last week).

Here are some background definitions before going into this:

BMR (Basal Metabolic Rate): The number of calories you burn at complete rest.
EAT (Exercise Associated Thermogenesis): Caloric requirements of training, or training expenditure.
NEAT (Non Exercise Activity Thermogenesis): Caloric requirements of activity that is not planned exercise. Vacuuming, driving, brushing your teeth, for example.
TEF/DIT (Thermic Effect of Feeding or Diet Induced Thermogenesis): Caloric expense of eating/digestion.
TDEE: (Total Daily Energy Expenditure) = Sum of the above. BMR+EAT+NEAT+TEF


Exercise calories, as they are typically used in MFP specifically, is represented by EAT in the above definition. Whether or not you should eat your EAT (giggity) depends on what system or method you are using to calculate your intake needs.

If you are using most other online calculation tools to determine an intake estimate, that estimate is going to already include EAT as part of the suggested intake. For example, it will ask you an activity factor that includes an average of your exercise, and with this it increases your TDEE to account for the fact that you are exercising.

If you are using MFP to tell you how much to eat, that estimate is NOT going to include EAT as part of the intake estimate.

Myfitnesspal uses a caloric estimation tool that expects you to eat back calories burned during exercise.

Consequently, MFP will essentially give you a LOWER intake estimate than an external TDEE calculator would give you.


In other words:

You tell MFP: I'd like to lose 1lb/week.

MFP says: Hey, you should eat X calories every day to lose 1lb/week.

You then decide to exercise and you burn 400 calories.

MFP says: Hey you pecker, you said you wanted to lose 1lb/week. Now you need to eat X+400 because you told me you wanted to lose 1lb/week.


So based on this:

If you are using MFP to tell you how many calories to eat, you should probably be eating back some portion of your exercise calories.

If you are using an external calculator and then customizing your intake to match that, you should not be eating back your exercise calories.

Lastly: Exercise expenditure is often over-stated.

My general opinion is that it's much simpler and uses less guess-work to use a custom intake and just forget about the exercise calorie model entirely, but that's a different topic of sorts, more discussion of which can be found here: http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/819055-setting-your-calorie-and-macro-targets

Depends on your goal. When losing weight, I didn't, as I wanted to lose as much weight as I could. Once I reached my goal, I did as I didn't want to lose more weight.

I only eat them back if my net calorie intake is less than 1,000 cals per day.

I lost over 120 lbs eating back my exercise calories, worked pretty damn well

Some but not all. I generally try to keep it under 1500, unless it's a rest day where I try to stay under 1200.

I train hard and eat back some of my exercise calories (taking into account overestimates).

I eat back half of what I have earned.

I usually eat back a portion of my exercise calories and it has worked for me. If I have a large deficit from very long run days, I might save the calories and use them later in the week. I use MFP to set my calorie goal.

I eat them back, both when I lost weight and now at maintenance - that's typically c.4000 a week but can be over 6000 in the cycling season.
There's no point setting a calorie balance goal and then not trying to meet it. It's not smart thinking to assume faster weight loss is better.

Exercise is for fitness, strength, preservation of lean mass plus it allows you much more freedom to eat while still hitting your goal.

GiveMeCoffee wrote: »

I lost over 120 lbs eating back my exercise calories, worked pretty damn well

^I lost 160+ NOT eating back my exercise calories, worked pretty damn well for me. I have been maintaining for 14 months.

We all ARE snowflakes! Do what works for you in all facets of this new way of living.