Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

CICO is not the whole equation

1356730

Replies

  • SideSteel
    SideSteel Posts: 11,068 Member
    msf74 wrote: »
    SideSteel wrote: »
    msf74 wrote: »
    You're right. It isn't.

    It's a good place to start though...

    I really wanted to avoid this thread but I can't help it.....

    Your beard is amazing.

    Ok carry on.

    Cheers man.

    Just wish I had grown it when I was single. Bush attracts bush, ne'er I mean?

    I'm talking about gardening you bunch of reprobates...

    HAHAHAHAHAHAH
  • Christine_72
    Christine_72 Posts: 16,049 Member
    Maybe OP is honing in on the "I eat what i want and only pay attention to calories" posts??
  • Hamsibian
    Hamsibian Posts: 1,388 Member
    Oy with the poodles already!
  • VintageFeline
    VintageFeline Posts: 6,771 Member
    Hamsibian wrote: »
    Oy with the poodles already!

    25 DAYS!!!
  • Hamsibian
    Hamsibian Posts: 1,388 Member
    Hamsibian wrote: »
    Oy with the poodles already!

    25 DAYS!!!

    I am so excited!!! Doesn't the quote seem to fit with so many threads on this site? :D

  • Lounmoun
    Lounmoun Posts: 8,423 Member
    Weight loss can improve health. Eating a certain way can improve health. Health is a complicated individual thing though. What one person needs to do to be healthy can be different than another person.
    What you need to do to lose weight boils down to the same for everyone though. CICO= weight management
    Nutrition= eat a variety of foods to meet your body's needs. This is somewhat different depending on size, age, activity level, health conditions, goals.
    About water- Drink enough fluids to your thirst level or until your urine is light/clear. Doesn't have to be just water.


  • Christine_72
    Christine_72 Posts: 16,049 Member
    Aaron_K123 wrote: »
    Maybe OP is honing in on the "I eat what i want and only pay attention to calories" posts??

    Maybe, but that doesn't mean that person is automatically malnourished or thinking that they don't need nutrition.

    I eat what I want when I want and only pay attention to calories. I just eat something like 2500 calories and I would have to eat a pretty weird diet to not recieve my nutirtion from that. As it turns out sometimes I want a salad, sometimes I'd like a carrot, sometimes I want tacobell, sometimes I want a slice of pizza. If you look at my diary (which is open) you'll see I'm generally hitting my nutritional needs.

    If you do look do note I don't usually bother to list salad greens I just list the dressing or toppings, so i actually am getting more dietary fiber than it seems like I am.

    LOL and here i was all ready to give you a lecture on how you don't eat enough greens :wink:

  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,942 Member
    edited November 2016
    DebSozo wrote: »
    I've asked this before on threads like this and I'll ask it again.

    Please provide evidence that there are regular forum users regularly telling people to eat what they want, regardless of nutrients and meeting macro and micro needs because that doesn't matter. Thus far I've had crickets to this request so fingers crossed this time.........

    It all matters. That is the point. Subject of thread is that CICO is not the whole equation.

    In the simplest terms, not as to weight loss because eating less than you burn is an absolute requirement.

    I personally prefer eating what I think is a nutritionally sound diet, but if I don't I will still lose weight as long as I eat less calories than I burn.

    @RobynTheresa, why would you have to earn the right to a treat? Why not work it into your calorie goals?

    And, you're proud you netted 1000 calories or so. That's a VLCD, and indicates disordered eating.
    DebSozo wrote: »
    It's not the whole equation. It is not simple addition and subtraction. There are other variables that influence the calculations. Change the variables and change the formula.

    Nope.

    Weight loss -> CICO

    Health, Satiety, Compliance, Satisfaction -> Macronutrient Partitioning and selection

    Honestly, I gave an analogy about this yesterday.

    Go into Home Depot. Pretend you're remodeling your kitchen. Stand there in the tile aisle. And seriously tell the person helping you, when she asks you how many square feet of tile you need, "Well, see, it's not just the amount of tile, it comes down to the type of tile you use."

    The yardstick you measure fabric with isn't the fabric.

    Additionally: Giant strawman of Big Mac all the time vs. healthy all the time rears its ugly head. Really?

    And, this.
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,942 Member
    Packerjohn wrote: »

    If you are on a 1,200 calorie goal you do need to eat back your exercise calories. Yesterday I did 1.5 hours at the gym including 45 minutes of strength training which Garmin Connect kindly told me was worth 307 calories. I can't fuel that on 1,200 calories. Overall my food intake yesterday was 1,536 calories, but my net was 1,052 (my total active calories was 484). And yes I lost weight on the scales this morning.

    You didn't lose a measurable amount of fat in one day.

    Correct. It was most likely natural fluctuation.
  • DebSozo
    DebSozo Posts: 2,578 Member
    edited November 2016



    NM
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,431 MFP Moderator
    You are confusing health with weight loss. Can you lose weight eating as much sugar and refined flour as you want as long you are in a deficit? Absolutely, the scientific laws of the universe demand it. Is it necessarily the healthiest option? No one is claiming it to be. Two. Separate. Issues.

    Only two seperate issues if one doesn't care about their health. If they do, then those issues go hand in hand, why does anyone try to lose weight? For their HEALTH! If they are doing it to get on the cover of Vogue, bad reason.

    Id have to disagee here. I have always been at a healthy weight and reasonably healthy. The only reason i wanted to lose weight was vanity - not ashamed to admit it and its not a bad reason. Im entitled to look however i want and be whatever size i want. Im sure im not alone.

    You are not alone. I need to lose another 10 ish lbs of fat and it's 100% vanity. I just want dem abs. And I largely start my weight loss journey to look better. Even being 50lbs over weight, my numbers were not that far out of whack and non of my doctors were really that concerned.
  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    You are confusing health with weight loss. Can you lose weight eating as much sugar and refined flour as you want as long you are in a deficit? Absolutely, the scientific laws of the universe demand it. Is it necessarily the healthiest option? No one is claiming it to be. Two. Separate. Issues.

    Only two seperate issues if one doesn't care about their health. If they do, then those issues go hand in hand, why does anyone try to lose weight? For their HEALTH! If they are doing it to get on the cover of Vogue, bad reason.

    Id have to disagee here. I have always been at a healthy weight and reasonably healthy. The only reason i wanted to lose weight was vanity - not ashamed to admit it and its not a bad reason. Im entitled to look however i want and be whatever size i want. Im sure im not alone.

    You're not alone. I've lost all I've needed to lose for health. At this point, anything I'm doing is purely for vanity or just for the sake of saying I could do it.

    Back to the discussion -- personally, I just tend to prefer what people think of as nutritious food. That's not to say I don't like the occasional indulgence, but they're not a regular part of my overall diet.

    I just never make the mistake of confusing my caloric intake with my nutrient intake and assuming they're the same thing.
  • crzycatlady1
    crzycatlady1 Posts: 1,930 Member
    Aaron_K123 wrote: »
    Maybe OP is honing in on the "I eat what i want and only pay attention to calories" posts??

    Maybe, but that doesn't mean that person is automatically malnourished or thinking that they don't need nutrition.

    I eat what I want when I want and only pay attention to calories. I just eat something like 2500 calories and I would have to eat a pretty weird diet to not recieve my nutirtion from that. As it turns out sometimes I want a salad, sometimes I'd like a carrot, sometimes I want tacobell, sometimes I want a slice of pizza. If you look at my diary (which is open) you'll see I'm generally hitting my nutritional needs.

    If you do look do note I don't usually bother to list salad greens I just list the dressing or toppings, so i actually am getting more dietary fiber than it seems like I am.

    This is me too, I like all the foods :# I only pay attention to calorie intake and don't track macros etc, but I eat a diet that's pretty varied, I'm in great health and I'm maintaining my loss, so I must be going something right.
  • JBApplebee
    JBApplebee Posts: 481 Member
    This reminds me of something my dad used to say. The more times you run over a dead cat, the flatter it gets. That line still makes me laugh.
  • Indygirl_81
    Indygirl_81 Posts: 142 Member
    I agree with the OP... CICO is not the end on be all for everyone. I can eat less calories than I expend but if they are loaded with carbs, I will gain- this is because of medical conditions. To those who don't have these, you don't understand that it does affect weight loss.... thank you OP!
This discussion has been closed.