Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
NYT article about obesity stating it's genetic, not lack of willpower
Replies
-
crzycatlady1 wrote: »
So how do you explain all the people who eat GMO foods and aren't overweight or obese, and are in good health?
Also, can you post links to the studies you're referring to so we can take a look at them thanks!
I don't believe it affects everyone, as I do believe genetics are involved as well. Here are some articles on the studies if you want to read up on it:
prevention.com/food/healthy-eating-tips/gmo-foods-linked-weight-gain
naturalsociety.com/how-gmo-foods-feed-junk-food-profits-not-the-world/
sciencenordic.com/growing-fatter-gm-diet
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3133759/
I'm still trying to wrap my mind around this idea-my family tree is full of overweight /obese/disease, especially type 2 diabetes, but I'm sitting at a bmi of around 21, no longer a prediabetic, am in excellent health and I eat GMO foods daily. So I just can't understand the idea of GMOs causing someone to gain weight, as long as they're eating at the correct calorie intake to maintain a healthy weight. Thanks for the links, I'll take a look at them2 -
crzycatlady1 wrote: »
I'm still trying to wrap my mind around this idea-my family tree is full of overweight /obese/disease, especially type 2 diabetes, but I'm sitting at a bmi of around 21, no longer a prediabetic, am in excellent health and I eat GMO foods daily. So I just can't understand the idea of GMOs causing someone to gain weight, as long as they're eating at the correct calorie intake to maintain a healthy weight. Thanks for the links, I'll take a look at them
It's something I believe in, but see what you think for yourself. I don't believe that GMO's cause ALL cases of obesity, but that it is a contributing factor in many cases.2 -
I think the biggest factor in obesity is the GMO's in our food, honestly. Countries without GMO's don't have these large-scale obesity problems. That being said, modern humans eat way too much food and don't get enough exercise. I'm not talking about going to the gym, I'm talking about just walking more daily. When I lived in Europe or even in NYC for that matter, I walked everywhere - to the corner store, to the train, to the bus, to the grocery store. And in those kinds of neighborhoods, you don't see the same obesity rates you see elsewhere.
Here are all the countries that have banned cultivation AND importing of GMO products, so they're GMO-free:
Algeria - 49.9% overweight or obese
Bhutan - 35.3% overweight or obese
Kyrgyzstan - 50.8% overweight or obese
Madagascar - 11.1% overweight or obese
Peru - 56.2% overweight or obese
Russia - 57.1% overweight or obese
Venezuela - 53.7% overweight or obese
This data is from a review published in 2015: http://publichealthintelligence.org/content/prevalence-overweight-and-obesity-worldwide
Another review about European countries was published in 2014 that had estimates for Kyrgyzstan and Russia even higher.
IDK about you, but seems to me that a lot of those GMO-free countries have obesity problems. Note that Algeria has had GMOs banned in entirety since 2000 - in 2000, the obesity rate in Algeria was 43.8%. Since the banning of GMOs, Algeria's obesity levels have continued to increase.12 -
The study you are referring to is the infamous Seralini study and is pure garbage. This was retracted by Food and Chemical Toxicology although there are a few anti-GMO journals now republishing this.
Anytime you see a study with no links to the raw data - dismiss this. Any reputable scientist will provide the raw data, instrument calibration, degree of error estimation, etc. to attempt to remove as much bias as possible. This was nothing more than an anti-GMO hit piece and destroyed any credibility of this movement.9 -
amusedmonkey wrote: »
GMO food has more calories than regular food?
No, they don't contain more calories. There has been research on rats fed GMO's and rats not fed GMO's. The rats who were fed the GMO's consumed more calories than the ones not fed them. Their appetites were larger and so they ate more than their counterparts not fed any food containing GMO's. They also were not able to digest the GMO food as well as the non-GMO food, further causing weight gain than just the additional calories craved. I don't really buy ANY of the statements from the FDA that say that GMO's are perfectly safe. Countries all over the world are doing research that states otherwise. Obesity rates started rising quickly as soon as GMO's were introduced to our food. It's not a coincidence. And I believe the US wants us to be overweight, honestly. Obesity is big business and great for the economy.
10 -
The_Enginerd wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »
GMO food has more calories than regular food?
No, they don't contain more calories. There has been research on rats fed GMO's and rats not fed GMO's. The rats who were fed the GMO's consumed more calories than the ones not fed them. Their appetites were larger and so they ate more than their counterparts not fed any food containing GMO's. They also were not able to digest the GMO food as well as the non-GMO food, further causing weight gain than just the additional calories craved. I don't really buy ANY of the statements from the FDA that say that GMO's are perfectly safe. Countries all over the world are doing research that states otherwise. Obesity rates started rising quickly as soon as GMO's were introduced to our food. It's not a coincidence. And I believe the US wants us to be overweight, honestly. Obesity is big business and great for the economy.
So you don't have little bits of undigested gmo corn in your hips?5 -
stevencloser wrote: »The_Enginerd wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »
GMO food has more calories than regular food?
No, they don't contain more calories. There has been research on rats fed GMO's and rats not fed GMO's. The rats who were fed the GMO's consumed more calories than the ones not fed them. Their appetites were larger and so they ate more than their counterparts not fed any food containing GMO's. They also were not able to digest the GMO food as well as the non-GMO food, further causing weight gain than just the additional calories craved. I don't really buy ANY of the statements from the FDA that say that GMO's are perfectly safe. Countries all over the world are doing research that states otherwise. Obesity rates started rising quickly as soon as GMO's were introduced to our food. It's not a coincidence. And I believe the US wants us to be overweight, honestly. Obesity is big business and great for the economy.
So you don't have little bits of undigested gmo corn in your hips?
12 -
I was obese with a BMI of 35 more than 20 years ago. When I was 22, I weighed in at 236 pounds (I'm 5'9"). When I was 23, I lost 100 pounds. I managed to keep it off for a couple years before I started gaining again. While I did gain weight, I never became obese again - just 'overweight'. In 2011, I decided I was not ready to be fat at 40. I lost about 60 pounds using a very small calorie cut of -250/day. After 14 months, I was back at 135 and have been there ever since May of 2012. This time, maintaining my ideal weight has been pretty easy. I still do have to log every day, but that's a small price to pay for maintenance. Genetics may be stacked against us folks with weight battles, but they DO NOT CONTROL US.
9 -
The_Enginerd wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »
GMO food has more calories than regular food?
No, they don't contain more calories. There has been research on rats fed GMO's and rats not fed GMO's. The rats who were fed the GMO's consumed more calories than the ones not fed them. Their appetites were larger and so they ate more than their counterparts not fed any food containing GMO's. They also were not able to digest the GMO food as well as the non-GMO food, further causing weight gain than just the additional calories craved. I don't really buy ANY of the statements from the FDA that say that GMO's are perfectly safe. Countries all over the world are doing research that states otherwise. Obesity rates started rising quickly as soon as GMO's were introduced to our food. It's not a coincidence. And I believe the US wants us to be overweight, honestly. Obesity is big business and great for the economy.
Very true, but one can't let logic and facts stand in the way of an agenda!6 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »During war, obese people didn't exist. it all the convenient prepackaged and cheap food ready available, we eat too much and the wrong food too....and we don't move walk eccetera......in the 50 they were all slim.....so what happen ? Do the genetic changed ? I don't think so.......
The prevalence of food and variety of food choices as well as the increasingly sedentary lifestyles of individuals has been discussed in this thread as likely being a large contributor to obesity. What are the "wrong foods" you refer to?
Personally in my case "wrong foods" are Processed Carbs. With effort I can gain weight eating No processed foods but my total carbs have to be > 50 grams daily.
So you believe that in many or most traditional cultures, eating traditional foods (or how we did in the US in the 1940s or 1950s) you would have been obese? Even if you had to be active in your daily life, etc.
Hmm.
Then you would have been an outlier and apparently the argument that we wouldn't have been fat in the '40s and '50s isn't accurate.
I really have no beliefs about food and histories.
All that I know factually in a medical sense at this point in my life is what I posted above based on lab results plus live results.0 -
I think some people are more genetically predisposed, but that doesn't mean that they can never lose weight ever. Just means they have to work a little harder than the rest is all. Kind of like me, for instance. Sub-clinical hypothyroidism (basically like a pre-cursor), I can obviously lose weight, but I work at it a lot more than others.2
-
chocolate_owl wrote: »[
Here are all the countries that have banned cultivation AND importing of GMO products, so they're GMO-free:
Algeria - 49.9% overweight or obese
Bhutan - 35.3% overweight or obese
Kyrgyzstan - 50.8% overweight or obese
Madagascar - 11.1% overweight or obese
Peru - 56.2% overweight or obese
Russia - 57.1% overweight or obese
Venezuela - 53.7% overweight or obese
This data is from a review published in 2015: http://publichealthintelligence.org/content/prevalence-overweight-and-obesity-worldwide
Another review about European countries was published in 2014 that had estimates for Kyrgyzstan and Russia even higher.
IDK about you, but seems to me that a lot of those GMO-free countries have obesity problems. Note that Algeria has had GMOs banned in entirety since 2000 - in 2000, the obesity rate in Algeria was 43.8%. Since the banning of GMOs, Algeria's obesity levels have continued to increase.
That's not all the countries that have banned GMOs to date. Some other countries that have banned most GMOs are: Scotland, Wales, Germany, France, The Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, and Switzerland (there are more, but I want to focus on these). These countries all range from 15-25% obese. The ones you listed are all impoverished countries so of course they aren't going to be the model of health, despite not producing GMO foods.
There's way more to obesity than GMOs, and I never claimed that was the only cause. I think it's a contributing factor for many people, again not all people. Genetics play into this too. But it's also about the lifestyle of the people. For example, Kyrgyzstan is 50.8% overweight but they also have less access to fresh fruit and vegetables. Algeria is the largest consumer of bread in the world, consuming 50-70 million loaves of bread PER DAY. They also have less access to fresh fruit and vegetables. So even though GMOs are banned there, their lifestyles still contribute to their obesity. Alcohol, salts, and sugars are common in foods in those places. That's why we should look to countries such as Norway, Denmark, and France since they live healthier lives overall. They eat fresh food, lots of produce, seafood, and not a lot of processed foods or things with preservatives.0 -
To pick just one, Scotland's overweight or obese number is about 65%. It also banned GMOs in 2015. Maybe comparing the numbers in Scotland vs. some other country going forward from 2015 would be informative, but GMOs certainly can't be relevant to current numbers (which obviously aren't great).
US numbers, btw, from another chart is 22nd in the world in most overweight and obese and a total of 67.3% overweight/obese (interestingly, in the US according to this chart men to worse than women). UK numbers (it doesn't seem to have Scotland on its own) are 32nd and 63.4%. Not a huge difference (men do worse in the UK too).
US does have more obese than the UK (including Scotland -- I don't see the numbers for it alone, but I expect it's not wildly different), but that difference was created BEFORE the change in the law about GMOs some places, and the likelihood is that it will decrease going forward, as it is likely to keep increasing to a point in other countries whereas it may have (based on some recent numbers) hit a cap in the US -- there may be genetic limits on how much of the population is likely to become obese, despite environment. Also, if Scotland and Wales banned it and England does not (as this seems to indicate is likely: http://www.scotsman.com/future-scotland/tech/was-the-scottish-government-right-to-ban-gm-crops-1-3902781), then I suppose comparing the two going forward would be interesting or, well, could be if it meant that people in Scotland consumed significantly less GMO crops, which I suspect would not be the case anyway, as it's about growing them, not being able to buy products with them in it, I think, and you'd assume English products in particular would be available.
But I'm no expert on the UK, so someone can jump in.
Anyway, I see no evidence indicating that GMOs have a thing to do with it. Seems like an argument intended to deny personal responsibility (the GMOs made us fat). If you want to look at differences, you can also see differences between US states.
Oh, and I've never eaten lots of pre-packaged stuff -- "processed" is the wrong word, as many of those countries are big on dairy and of course dairy is "processed" as is anything smoked, pickled, etc. -- and yet I got fat. How? I ate too much.
Interestingly, I checked the WF list of common GMO products since I wondered if I was wrong to think I didn't consume much that was likely GMO, and found that non organic zucchini and summer squash were the main things I'm likely to have consumed (I get corn only locally in season and the farms I usually buy from are organic, even though I don't personally care about organics, and I probably get some GMO soy, but really didn't before losing weight as all the stuff that might contain it (maybe protein bars which I eat occasionally) are things I started eating then). Hmm.3 -
chocolate_owl wrote: »[
Here are all the countries that have banned cultivation AND importing of GMO products, so they're GMO-free:
Algeria - 49.9% overweight or obese
Bhutan - 35.3% overweight or obese
Kyrgyzstan - 50.8% overweight or obese
Madagascar - 11.1% overweight or obese
Peru - 56.2% overweight or obese
Russia - 57.1% overweight or obese
Venezuela - 53.7% overweight or obese
This data is from a review published in 2015: http://publichealthintelligence.org/content/prevalence-overweight-and-obesity-worldwide
Another review about European countries was published in 2014 that had estimates for Kyrgyzstan and Russia even higher.
IDK about you, but seems to me that a lot of those GMO-free countries have obesity problems. Note that Algeria has had GMOs banned in entirety since 2000 - in 2000, the obesity rate in Algeria was 43.8%. Since the banning of GMOs, Algeria's obesity levels have continued to increase.
That's not all the countries that have banned GMOs to date. Some other countries that have banned most GMOs are: Scotland, Wales, Germany, France, The Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, and Switzerland (there are more, but I want to focus on these). These countries all range from 15-25% obese. The ones you listed are all impoverished countries so of course they aren't going to be the model of health, despite not producing GMO foods.
There's way more to obesity than GMOs, and I never claimed that was the only cause. I think it's a contributing factor for many people, again not all people. Genetics play into this too. But it's also about the lifestyle of the people. For example, Kyrgyzstan is 50.8% overweight but they also have less access to fresh fruit and vegetables. Algeria is the largest consumer of bread in the world, consuming 50-70 million loaves of bread PER DAY. They also have less access to fresh fruit and vegetables. So even though GMOs are banned there, their lifestyles still contribute to their obesity. Alcohol, salts, and sugars are common in foods in those places. That's why we should look to countries such as Norway, Denmark, and France since they live healthier lives overall. They eat fresh food, lots of produce, seafood, and not a lot of processed foods or things with preservatives.
The other countries that have banned GMOs have banned cultivation, but not all imports are banned. I chose the countries I did because they have bans on GMOs across the board, and some of them have the longest standing bans on GMOs.
If you want to look at the obesity stats on the other countries that have banned GMOs, click on the link I posted. The countries you're referencing have the following rates of overweight + obese prevalance:
UK (Scotland, Wales) - 61.8%
Germany - 56.7%
France - 49.2%
The Netherlands - 49.0%
Denmark - 51.9%
Norway - 52.9%
Switzerland - 48.2%
NONE of them are in the 15-25% range you claim, unless you specifically mean OBESE and exclude overweight. Then yes, 15-25% is about right. Most Western countries, regardless of their position of GMOs, fall in between 15-25% of BMI>30.
Also, in your original post, you stated the biggest factor contributing to obesity was GMOs. Apart from that being completely unsupported by science, the epidemiological data we have available to us indicates that's not the case at all. Obesity rates are not low/have not decreased in countries that have banned GMOs. Countries in East Asia and Africa that have no regulations on GMOs have some of the lowest obesity rates worldwide.
Blaming GMOs over things like food availability, activity levels, and cultural norms is one of the strangest things I've read on this forum, TBH.7 -
The whole concept doesn't make sense to me. GMO is not an ingredient that you can pinpoint. Not all genetic modifications modify the same genes or use the same genetic engineering method. You can't pool them all under one big umbrella saying they cause weight gain without specifying the exact GMO crop and the exact modification that would potentially cause the correlation, plus a potential theory about the mechanism or how that would work (assuming the study has merit, which apparently it doesn't since it was pulled). That's like saying "a study found that a certain medication is associated with increased appetite" means "all medications cause obesity, and we started gaining weight when regulated pharmaceuticals were introduced".11
-
amusedmonkey wrote: »The whole concept doesn't make sense to me.
That's because it doesn't make sense...at all...
6 -
I live in France. Of the 6 countries I have lived in for significant years at a time, France is at the top of my list for amazement at the food they eat and no consequent prevelant obesity. The others are US, Canada, Portugal, Italy and Ireland. None of those countries eat the type of foods we eat here all the time. Its an interesting question, what causes obesity? My answer is that it happens from regularly eating too much.3
-
amusedmonkey wrote: »The whole concept doesn't make sense to me. GMO is not an ingredient that you can pinpoint. Not all genetic modifications modify the same genes or use the same genetic engineering method. You can't pool them all under one big umbrella saying they cause weight gain without specifying the exact GMO crop and the exact modification that would potentially cause the correlation, plus a potential theory about the mechanism or how that would work (assuming the study has merit, which apparently it doesn't since it was pulled). That's like saying "a study found that a certain medication is associated with increased appetite" means "all medications cause obesity, and we started gaining weight when regulated pharmaceuticals were introduced".
Yeah, great points.1 -
The study was conducted by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. You do know how these people make their money, right?3
-
Perhaps a family history of being overweight is largely due to bad eating habits that have been passed on from one generation to another as opposed to being "genetically" predisposed. Not saying that genes don't play a role, but the amount of obese & morbidly obese people today is likely the result of countless advertisements showing food, food, food....innumerable fast food outlets, high calorie, supersized portions & our preoccupation with food, food, food is a societal ill....The bottom line: someone, somewhere is raking in a gazillion bucks at the expense of making many people very unhealthy. But as a previous commenter said, no one can stuff the food down our gullet except ourselves. SO, we may not have any control over any of the other stuff, but we can take control of what we put in our mouth & whether we move our body enough to burn off some of what we put in our mouth. Just sayin'0
-
I know a few people who eat whatever they want, whenever they want, and exercise as often or as rarely as they want, and they're lean and healthy as far as I can tell. I assume the differences are mostly genetic. Whether DNA or epigenetic or a combination of both.
They're rare as unicorns these days, so I don't resent them too much.2 -
This is your perfect "nature vs nurture" type of situation. I'm voting for nurture.
Sure, there might be a small genetic component. But it would be like 1% of the influence. Your habits, which are taught at a very young age by your family, are the other 99%. Focus on what you can control.2 -
I know a few people who eat whatever they want, whenever they want, and exercise as often or as rarely as they want, and they're lean and healthy as far as I can tell. I assume the differences are mostly genetic. Whether DNA or epigenetic or a combination of both.
They're rare as unicorns these days, so I don't resent them too much.
I am like this too! Except I used to be a BMI of 28.
I can eat what I want when I want because "what I want" is less now than it used to be.3 -
I know a few people who eat whatever they want, whenever they want, and exercise as often or as rarely as they want, and they're lean and healthy as far as I can tell. I assume the differences are mostly genetic. Whether DNA or epigenetic or a combination of both.
They're rare as unicorns these days, so I don't resent them too much.
Unless you're with these people 24 hours a day, then you don't know how many calories they're actually consuming. And portion sizes can be misleading to look at as well. I've had people make comments about how much I'm eating when we're at a gathering or out at a restaurant-what they don't see is how few calories I ate the rest of the day (or day before/day after etc).2 -
I know a few people who eat whatever they want, whenever they want, and exercise as often or as rarely as they want, and they're lean and healthy as far as I can tell. I assume the differences are mostly genetic. Whether DNA or epigenetic or a combination of both.
They're rare as unicorns these days, so I don't resent them too much.
I would say that it's more because you have an observational bias and you don't know what they really eat or do and this is the whole problem with this line of reasoning. Most people who are severely obese don't appear to others to be eating too much because they are often very conscious of what they eat around others and will often self-report more exercise than they actually do -- I've personally witnessed this as I come from a very heavy family that is rife with metabolic disorder. There are very few people with truly fast or slow metabolisms and usually those differences are rather minor and don't explain the results very well (i.e. low practical significants). I remember watching one show, and yes it's anecdotal but shows this effect very well and it has been shown in research, where two people appeared to each other to eat and exercise about the same. One was lean and the other very heavy and the two women had known each other for a long time and the lean woman had thought that the heavier woman ate and exercised as much as she did due to what she had observed and heard the other talk about. When the documentary team actually observed and recorded what they ate and how much they exercised the differences were astounding. The heavier one ate most of her calories alone and claimed substantially more exercise than she had done.
The differences noted by the documentary team easily explained the differences between the two and it had nothing to do with DNA or epigenetics. Both had normal metabolisms and no medical issues that would have caused the profound difference in weight; it was all due to lifestyle differences as would be predicted.6 -
My point isn't that they're defying the laws of physics. They just don't think about what they put in their mouths vs what they burn off. Ever.
Probably they do pig out sometimes and then skip meals or eat light. But they don't have to think about it. They don't struggle with hunger. They just do it. Of course many of those people were young when I knew them and we've lost touch. Things might have changed in later years!1 -
My point isn't that they're defying the laws of physics. They just don't think about what they put in their mouths vs what they burn off. Ever.
Probably they do pig out sometimes and then skip meals or eat light. But they don't have to think about it. They don't struggle with hunger. They just do it. Of course many of those people were young when I knew them and we've lost touch. Things might have changed in later years!
This was addressed in this thread already I believe, but has been discussed in countless others. Unless you are with them 24 hours a day, logging their food for them and measuring their calorie burns, these magical people who can eat and eat and eat and not gain weight just don't exist. Usually it is that you see one meal they eat in a day or week, and assume they eat like that for every single meal, or you don't know that they walk 20k steps every day so that they are burning higher calories than it would appear.
Somewhere there's a video clip someone might be able to dig up and post about two women, one of whom insisted her friend was one of those people, but it was simply not the case when the meals and calories were accurately tracked.
4 -
I assumed nothing. Unless of course they were all lying and secretly counting calories and working out to stay lean and then pretending to do so effortlessly.
I have seen that video, though. It's good.
My point is, they ate (or claimed to eat) to satiety, to use a technical term, and did not force exercise in order to burn off the excess.2 -
My point isn't that they're defying the laws of physics. They just don't think about what they put in their mouths vs what they burn off. Ever.
Probably they do pig out sometimes and then skip meals or eat light. But they don't have to think about it. They don't struggle with hunger. They just do it. Of course many of those people were young when I knew them and we've lost touch. Things might have changed in later years!
Time changes everything! I was rail thin when I was a teen then I was obese for several years as an adult before I decided to take control again. We develop bad habits when we are young and are more active but when we have careers and kids it catches up.
1 -
I think some people just don't have much interest in food (so they eat based on hunger, but not because food seems tempting) or just don't have much natural appetite. My sister dated a guy like that for a while (he was quite thin) -- he'd eat and appreciate food sometimes, but often would forget to eat lunch and if on his own might just have rice for dinner. Sounds like an ED almost here, but he wasn't excessively thin and didn't seem to have any weird issues and would eat fine if at a restaurant or someone else cooked -- maybe just lazy, but he didn't seem interested in snacks or anything.
Others just naturally are active and enjoy it without thinking of it as exercise (or do it on the job).
Still others just seem to naturally see regulating eating and exercise as something you do and don't make a big thing out of it and you'd maybe think they never thought about it. Years ago I used to think this about my sister and co-workers until I paid more attention and saw that they did offset larger meals with smaller or pay attention to what they were eating and work in exercise -- for whatever reason they did this as a way of avoiding getting overweight, whereas I let myself get fat before figuring out that I needed to do it. My sister does lots of little things that get her to the same place I had to figure out strategies to do -- not sure why, but I don't think it's a genetic difference.
And of course some people just naturally have an equilibrium of the eating and exercise they like and the weight they like without thinking about it. This was me until my late 20s (and probably is more common in relatively young people, as I was), and I would have said that I wasn't naturally thin and would have had to work too hard to get that way (although I had never tried to lose weight seriously at all), but that the tradeoff was that I could eat whatever I wanted and not gain weight. And I thought I ate a lot, but I didn't really -- I just didn't have to think about limiting what I ate and I did eat a lot at specific occasional. When those occasions became more common (for example, when my job meant that I ate at restaurants a lot and I still saw restaurants as a time to indulge), and when my activity decreased (because of normal lifestyle changes that are likely common), I gained easily.6
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions